Realme C55 智能手机评测--运行时间长、充电快
潜在的竞争对手比较
Bewertung | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 78.5 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Realme C55 Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2 | 189.5 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.72" | 2400x1080 | |
| 78.5 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Honor X8a Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2 | 179 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.70" | 2388x1080 | |
| 80.1 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G SD 685, Adreno 610 | 188 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
| 75.9 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2 | 201 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 |
外壳和设备 - 还可根据要求提供黄色外壳
realme C55 棱角分明的外观和圆润的边角给人留下了深刻的第一印象，因此这款手机的手感也很好。
我们的测试设备采用经典黑色，背面看起来像金属拉丝。尽管设计质量很高，但它只是由塑料制成。光面相机模块在这里显得有些格格不入。名为 "Sunshower "的黄色版本更加有趣，它的背面采用了彩虹色。
这款手机看起来相当轻薄，尤其是与 三星Galaxy A14 LTE.
realme C55 有两种存储版本：
- 128 GB 大容量存储/6 GB 内存：219 欧元
- 256 GB 大容量存储/8 GB 内存：259 欧元
realme 宣传显着更大的 RAM，但它是部分虚拟 RAM 的系统使用显着较慢的大容量存储闪存的一部分。因此，这个虚拟内存应该可以让需要大量内存的应用程序正常运行，但也会降低它们的运行速度。
得益于 NFC 技术，谷歌支付等服务可以顺利使用。这款手机可以接受两张 SIM 卡，还有一个 microSD 专用插槽。在我们使用参考 microSD Angelbird V60 进行的测试中，读卡器的读取速度有点慢。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Angelbird V60) | |
| Realme C55 (Angelbird V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 配备最新软件的 4G 手机
价格低廉的 realme C55 是一款 4G 智能手机，支持国内使用所需的大部分频率。不过，您应该仔细检查是否可以在进一步旅行的目的地国家使用手机上网。
在我们的测试期间，手机接收效果比较一般，但在市内环境中从未出现过完全中断的情况。
这款中端手机还配备了 WiFi 5，在我们的测试中，realme C55 实现了相当不错的稳定传输速率，最高可达 384 MBit/s。
Android 13 预装在智能手机上，realme UI 位于其上方，在某些方面对系统的改变较大。在测试时，安全补丁是从 2023 年 7 月开始的，因此是最新的。不过，目前还不知道更新会持续多久。此外，您还必须处理制造商在出厂时预装的许多第三方应用程序。
一些信息会出现在前置摄像头周围的显示屏上，其灵感来自Apple 的动态岛。但这并不总是可见的，例如在连接充电器时会弹出。
90 Hz 的触摸屏非常容易使用，表面也很光滑。待机键右侧集成了指纹传感器，可在短暂延迟后可靠解锁手机。人脸识别功能也可用。不过，它只适用于二维图像，因此容易受到操控。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Realme C55 | |
| Honor X8a | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Realme C55 | |
| Honor X8a | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G | |
摄像机 - 视频部分的优势
realme C55 的主摄像头像素高达 6400 万，它想成为一款非常特别的产品。事实上，通常只使用 1/4的分辨率，从而获得感光度更高的 1600 万像素照片。在特殊模式下还可以使用全分辨率。
主摄像头拍摄的照片看起来色彩艳丽，乍一看也相当清晰，但只有放大后才会发现细节还原得相当粗糙。亮度也有待提高，自动对焦在弱光环境下也有问题。总的来说，这款相机的拍照效果在同价位产品中还算不错，但缺少一个灵活性更强的广角镜头。
视频最多可录制 60 帧/秒的 1080p 格式。与同价位的许多其他智能手机相比，C55 的帧频更高，画面更流畅，因此在这方面具有优势。事实上，亮度调节和自动对焦的效果相当不错，视频看起来清晰且色彩丰富。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera, flowerMain camera, surroundingsLow Light
显示屏 - 不太均匀
IPS 屏幕具有扩展的 FullHD 分辨率，亮度高达 469 cd/m²。但 小米Redmi Note 12 4G显示，AMOLED 屏幕在该价格范围内也是可行的。realme C55 的屏幕中央比两侧亮得多。
对比度尚可，因此色彩还算鲜艳，但在分光光度计的测试中，我们看到了一些偏蓝现象。色彩渲染相当逼真。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 515 cd/m²
Contrast: 1471:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.46 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.248
| Realme C55 IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Honor X8a IPS, 2388x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -2% | 89% | -20% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 27.8 ? | 29 ? -4% | 2.8 ? 90% | 35.55 ? -28% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 14.1 ? | 14 ? 1% | 1.7 ? 88% | 15.68 ? -11% |
| PWM Frequency | 484 | 343500 | ||
| Screen | 15% | 37% | -91% | |
| Brightness middle | 515 | 492 -4% | 650 26% | 465 -10% |
| Brightness | 469 | 481 3% | 658 40% | 439 -6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 94 11% | 97 14% | 89 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.38 -9% | 0.47 -34% | |
| Contrast | 1471 | 1295 -12% | 989 -33% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.46 | 1.32 62% | 1.55 55% | 8.5 -146% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.88 | 3.37 31% | 2.59 47% | 15.8 -224% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.1 | 1.9 39% | 1.8 42% | 11.8 -281% |
| Gamma | 2.248 98% | 2.194 100% | 2.194 100% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 7320 89% | 6288 103% | 6316 103% | 10757 60% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 7% /
12% | 63% /
50% | -56% /
-77% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 14.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 27.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 无需每天充电
联发科 联发科 Helio G88联发科 Helio G88 是一款典型的中端 SoC，C55 的实际性能也不错，在竞争中并不突出。在日常使用中，系统通常运行流畅，但在要求较高的任务或同时运行多个应用程序时，卡顿总是无法避免。
我们测量到，在较长时间的长期负载下，最高温度为 47.2 °C。这一点很明显，但在日常使用中温度通常会低得多。在运行 20 次要求较高的基准测试后，SoC 会略有节流，但性能下降幅度很小。
扬声器位于智能手机的下边缘。扬声器的音量相当大，听起来相当结实，而且不会过载。语音清晰，但在音乐曲目中，乐器和人声很快就会混合成定义不清的杂音。3.5 毫米端口和蓝牙可用于连接外部音频设备。SBC、AAC、LDAC 和最重要的 aptX 编解码器可用于无线声音传输。
即使电池完全耗尽，realme C55 也能在一个多小时内充满电。这要归功于它的 33 瓦充电技术和附带的充电器。这使它成为低价中端手机中真正的快速充电手机之一。在我们的无线局域网测试中，电池续航时间也令人信服：在中等负荷下可使用 16:15 小时，适合日常使用。
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Realme C55 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G88 (7611 - 13413, n=6) | |
| Honor X8a | |
| Realme C55 | Honor X8a | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G | Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -21% | 241% | -10% | -5% | 446% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 305.4 | 278.1 -9% | 954.87 213% | 298.69 -2% | 283 ? -7% | 1839 ? 502% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 179.2 | 224.2 25% | 709.51 296% | 200.17 12% | 194.6 ? 9% | 1425 ? 695% |
| Random Read 4KB | 83.6 | 61.6 -26% | 261.09 212% | 55.9 -33% | 82.7 ? -1% | 277 ? 231% |
| Random Write 4KB | 67.9 | 18.7 -72% | 231.57 241% | 55.86 -18% | 55.1 ? -19% | 309 ? 355% |
温度
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G | |
| Realme C55 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Honor X8a | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G | |
| Realme C55 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Honor X8a | |
发言人
Realme C55 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 37.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=203, last 2 years) | |
| Realme C55 | |
| Honor X8a | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G | |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 不寻常，如果需要的话
realme C55 是一款相当便宜的中端手机，它的外壳质量上乘，如果需要的话，甚至还能让人眼前一亮。它充电迅速，续航时间长，提供足够的电量供日常使用，还拥有稳定的无线局域网。
在同价位手机中，它的相机拍照效果还算不错，甚至比同价位手机更胜一筹，能以 60-fps 的速度录制 1080p 的视频。软件是最新的，但你不应该被许多预装的广告应用程序所困扰。此外，无法保证多长时间内会进行更新。
realme C55 几乎没有什么值得批评的地方：它是一款坚如磐石的中端手机，拍照效果不错。
总的来说，realme C55 被证明是一款非常出色的中端手机，但它必须与强大的竞争对手一决高下：小米 小米Redmi Note 12 4G采用了 AMOLED 显示屏，而 Honor X8a拥有更好的摄像头。
Realme C55
- 08/03/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
