Notebookcheck Logo

小米Redmi Note 12S 智能手机评测:轻巧、廉价、OLED 屏幕

苗条纤细。

Redmi Note 12S 是一款配备 6.43 英寸屏幕的紧凑型智能手机。它提供大量存储空间和高分辨率主摄像头,但没有 5G 功能。在我们的评测中,我们将看看这款紧凑型中端智能手机的表现如何。
Android ARM Smartphone
小米Redmi Note 12S

屏幕小于 7 英寸的智能手机已不再罕见,但对有些人来说,小巧的智能手机无疑更实用。它更适合放在口袋里,小手更容易使用,而且通常更轻。

Redmi Note 12S 是小米廉价中端系列中新推出的一款略小的机型。但这并不意味着你必须放弃 AMOLED 屏幕和足够的存储空间。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S (Redmi Note 12 Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G96 8 x 2 - 2.1 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.43 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 235 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD (shared, up to 1TB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.1 x 159.9 x 73.9
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 33-watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix f/​1.9, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.4, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: hybrid stereo speakers, 24 Months Warranty, FM Radio, fanless
Weight
176 g
Price
249 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
80.4 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2023
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2
176 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.43"2400x1080
78.5 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
Honor X8a
Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2
179 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.70"2388x1080
81.7 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
SD 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619
189 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
79.1 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Motorola Moto G53
SD 480+, Adreno 619
183 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"1600x720
79.4 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
202 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2408x1080

小米Redmi Note 12S 是一款相当轻巧的智能手机,仅重 176 克,体积明显小于同类产品。小米Redmi Note 12 5G等智能手机相比要小得多。不过,屏幕周围的边框清晰可见,因此如果稍加调整,这款手机可能会更加小巧。

手机外壳由塑料制成,背面闪烁着珍珠绿冰蓝 玛瑙黑的光泽。摄像头模块从外壳中清晰地凸显出来,并因其深色而显得格外突出。尽管采用了简单的塑料边框,但智能手机非常稳定,几乎无法扭曲。背面有些地方可能会轻微凹陷。

Redmi Note 12S 没有指定保护标准,因此不应暴露在多尘环境中或浸入水中。

小米Redmi Note 12S
小米Redmi Note 12S
小米Redmi Note 12S
小米Redmi Note 12S
小米Redmi Note 12S

尺寸比较

167.7 mm 78 mm 9.1 mm 202 g165.9 mm 76.2 mm 8 mm 189 g162.7 mm 74.7 mm 8.2 mm 183 g162.9 mm 74.5 mm 7.5 mm 179 g159.9 mm 73.9 mm 8.1 mm 176 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - 花小钱,大内存

小米Redmi Note 12S 有两种配置,其供应情况取决于所在地。价格也是如此。

  • 128 GB 大容量存储空间/6 GB 内存
  • 256 GB 大容量存储空间/8 GB 内存

一个与众不同的功能是调频收音机功能。这在没有网络覆盖或不想使用任何移动数据时非常方便。红外线端口还可以连接遥控设备。

此外,还配备了 NFC 功能,可以使用移动支付服务。

左:SIM 卡插槽
左:SIM 卡插槽
右:待机键,音量摇杆
右:待机键,音量摇杆
顶部:红外触发器、扬声器、3.5 毫米接口
顶部:红外触发器、扬声器、3.5 毫米接口
底部:麦克风、USB-C 接口、扬声器
底部:麦克风、USB-C 接口、扬声器

microSD 读卡器

microSD 插槽也是智能手机的第二个 SIM 卡插槽,因此您必须决定是使用两张 SIM 卡,还是使用一张 SIM 卡和 microSD 来获得更多存储空间。

在使用我们的 Angelbird V60 参考卡进行测试时,读取速度相当慢。CPDT 基准测试显示数据传输速率一再下降,因此读卡器只能用于使用频率较低的数据。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
50.48 MB/s +156%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
26.8 MB/s +36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
23.14 MB/s +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
19.7 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34.6 (15.6-48.3)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.3 (4.86-48.5)
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø38.9 (28.3-49.6)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø37.2 (22.3-48.4)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.3 (44.9-85.2)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø61.2 (29.9-79.8)
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø76.1 (26.1-84.4)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø75.7 (20.1-83.4)

软件 -Android 13 ex works

Android 13 已预装在智能手机上。除此之外,还预装了内部的 MiUI 14,它对系统进行了重大改动,有时会在使用系统应用程序时显示广告。此外还预装了大量第三方应用程序,如果需要,可以直接删除。

小米Redmi Note 12S 并不属于 "Android 企业推荐 "计划,该计划可提供有关更新频率和持续时间的信息。因此,很难获得有关该智能手机预期更新和软件供应的信息。

小米 Redmi Note 11S11S 的前身从Android 11 开始,将收到Android 13。因此,预计Redmi Note 12S 2 也会有主要的版本更新。安全补丁是从 2023 年 7 月开始的,因此在评测时还算是最新的。在低价位产品中,小米通常每 3 个月提供一次安全更新。

小米Redmi Note 12S 上的软件
小米Redmi Note 12S 上的软件
小米Redmi Note 12S 上的软件

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 跟踪不准确

得益于 WiFi 5,Redmi Note 12S 在使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器时的数据传输速率高达 388 Mbit/s。因此,这款智能手机的数据传输速率达到了这个价位的通常水平,但我们在测试过程中也观察到数据传输速率有一两次明显下降。在多次重复测试时,这些情况会以不规则的间隔出现。

在靠近路由器的地方,智能手机显示出完整的信号强度,网站加载速度也相当快。在 10 米的距离和穿过 3 面墙时,信号强度保持不变,但网页加载速度明显变慢。

Redmi Note 12S 是一款 4G 智能手机。它提供国内使用所需的最多频率,但您必须进一步询问在国外旅行时是否可以使用移动互联网。在大约两周的评测阶段,我们反复检查了信号,并在同一地点与同网络的高端智能手机进行了比较。小米智能手机在这里处于中等水平,通常无法跟上更昂贵的智能手机的信号强度,但在市内环境中从未完全失去信号

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=191, last 2 years)
711 MBit/s +122%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
369 (361min - 371max) MBit/s +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
347 (336min - 351max) MBit/s +8%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
345 (317min - 350max) MBit/s +8%
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
333 (276min - 345max) MBit/s +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
320 (241min - 354max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=193, last 2 years)
725 MBit/s +97%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
369 (337min - 380max) MBit/s 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
368 (326min - 388max) MBit/s
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
367 (351min - 384max) MBit/s 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
363 (349min - 374max) MBit/s -1%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
358 (319min - 374max) MBit/s -3%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø319 (241-354)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø368 (326-388)
户外 GPS 测试
户外 GPS 测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

红米智能手机可与所有主要的卫星网络合作进行定位。此外还支持 SBAS,以实现更精确的定位。当我们走到户外时,只需一小会儿就能精确定位到 5 米左右。

至于它的实际功能,我们带着Redmi Note 12 进行了一次自行车骑行,同时还带上了 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表作为对比。

事实证明,即使在相当开阔的地形上,小米智能手机的导航能力也很有限。我们一次又一次地看到明显偏离路线的情况,而且记录的环路明显太小。

在古镇狭窄的街道和过桥时,这些误差也依然存在。根据Redmi Note 12,我们穿过了房屋,在水面上盘旋。即使是这个价位的智能手机也能更精确地跟踪用户。

追踪小米Redmi Note 12S - 概述
追踪小米Redmi Note 12S - 概述
跟踪小米Redmi Note 12S - 循环
跟踪小米Redmi Note 12S - 循环
追踪小米Redmi Note 12S - 桥梁
追踪小米Redmi Note 12S - 桥梁
跟踪 Garmin Venu 2 - 概述
跟踪 Garmin Venu 2 - 概述
跟踪 Garmin Venu 2 - 循环
跟踪 Garmin Venu 2 - 循环
跟踪 Garmin Venu 2 - 桥梁
跟踪 Garmin Venu 2 - 桥梁

电话和语音质量 - 必要时声音响亮

小米手机使用谷歌的标准应用程序进行通话。

通过集成的听筒,语音质量清晰响亮,即使在嘈杂的环境中也能很好地理解对方的意思。麦克风也能清晰地捕捉到我们的声音,但时不时会出现一些小的掉音。

扬声器和免提模式的音质明显较弱,因此另一端的人听起来更远,也更难理解。不过,根据对方的说法,我们的声音是以一种易于理解的方式传达的。

相机 - 系统灵活,照片效果出色

使用前置摄像头拍照
使用前置摄像头拍照

Redmi Note 12S 的主摄像头分辨率为 1.08 亿像素,采用三星的 Isocell HM2 传感器。它将 9 个像素合成一个大像素,因此能拍摄出 1200 万像素的图像,且感光度良好。全分辨率只能在特殊模式下使用。

拍摄出来的照片在白平衡方面比较冷,但这有助于真实再现。乍一看,图像很清晰,但放大后细节就会丢失。日光下的动态效果令人满意,但在光线较弱的情况下,动态效果会有所下降,在暗处和亮处都会显示出明显的弱点。

广角相机的分辨率为 800 万像素,在普通拍照模式下,可以使用焦距介于两个镜头之间的混合变焦。该摄像头拍摄的照片效果不错,但你不应该放大照片来查看细节。背面的第三个镜头是一个低分辨率微距摄像头,只能在特殊模式下使用。

前置摄像头为 1600 万像素索尼摄像头。在光线充足的情况下,它能拍出清晰的自拍照,但动态效果不佳,放大后细节看起来颗粒感很强。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera - flowerMain camera - surrounding environmentMain camera - low lightWide angle

三星的主摄像头仍需在测试实验室中证明自己。下面是我们在全棚照明下拍摄的测试图。图片边缘的锐度明显下降,红色背景前的黑色文字也给相机带来了锐度问题。

在照度仅为 1 lux 的情况下,图像仍然可以辨认,但细节非常少。

ColorChecker
8.3 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
9 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
0.8 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S: 8.8 ∆E min: 0.85 - max: 14.9 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
51.6 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
56.7 ∆E
51.3 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
39.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
58.5 ∆E
58.8 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
45.4 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
69.3 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
41.2 ∆E
75.1 ∆E
67.2 ∆E
49.6 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S: 44.1 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 75.14 ∆E

附件和保修 - 含保护套

除了充电器和 USB 线缆外,包装中还有一个智能手机硅胶套和一个打开 SIM 卡托盘的工具。不过,你不会找到一个有线耳机,如果你想使用 FM 收音机,这是绝对必要的,因为它可以替代天线。

小米为在欧盟购买的智能手机提供 24 个月的保修服务(欧盟以外地区可能有所不同)。另外,电池和电源适配器也享受 2 年整机保修。

输入设备和操作 - 精确触摸屏

由于屏幕每秒可显示高达 90 帧的画面,因此操作起来感觉非常灵敏。精确的触摸屏也功不可没,在边边角角都能顺利接受我们的指令。

指纹传感器集成在右侧的待机键上。它能对已注册的指纹做出快速、可靠的反应,并以最小的延迟解锁智能手机。Redmi Note 12S 还提供面部识别功能。不过,它只能对二维图像进行识别,因此容易受到操控。

纵向模式键盘
纵向模式键盘
横向模式键盘
横向模式键盘

显示屏 - 屏幕明亮、准确

子像素网格
子像素网格

这个价位(略高于 200 美元)的手机很少采用 AMOLED 屏幕,但小米Redmi Note 12S 却采用了这种屏幕。它具有增强的 FullHD 分辨率和高达 90 Hz 的帧速率。

亮度也达到了很高的水平,尽管我们测得的平均亮度只有 631 cd/m²,而不是小米宣传的 700 cd/m²。我们在小范围内测得的亮度超过 900 cd/m²(APL 18),因此该显示屏也非常适合 HDR 内容,尽管它并没有这样宣传。

由于可以关闭像素,AMOLED 屏幕的黑色值几乎是完美的,这使得小米Redmi Note 12S 的对比度强烈,色彩鲜艳。

638
cd/m²
626
cd/m²
624
cd/m²
636
cd/m²
627
cd/m²
625
cd/m²
643
cd/m²
636
cd/m²
627
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 643 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 631.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 627 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.15 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.284
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"
Honor X8a
IPS, 2388x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Motorola Moto G53
IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
PLS LCD, 2408x1080, 6.6"
Screen
-27%
-11%
-77%
-272%
Brightness middle
627
492
-22%
658
5%
587
-6%
579
-8%
Brightness
631
481
-24%
663
5%
559
-11%
543
-14%
Brightness Distribution
97
94
-3%
98
1%
91
-6%
87
-10%
Black Level *
0.38
0.4
0.57
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.15
1.32
-15%
1.4
-22%
2.6
-126%
7.6
-561%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.05
3.37
-64%
2.7
-32%
5.62
-174%
12.7
-520%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.4
1.9
-36%
1.7
-21%
3.3
-136%
8.7
-521%
Gamma
2.284 96%
2.194 100%
2.23 99%
2.463 89%
2.23 99%
CCT
6347 102%
6288 103%
6504 100%
6288 103%
9344 70%
Contrast
1295
1468
1016

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 355.6 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 355.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 355.6 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

0% 亮度
0% 亮度
25% 亮度
25% 亮度
50% 亮度
50% 亮度
75% 亮度
75% 亮度
亮度为 100
亮度为 100

在固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置下进行的系列测量

令人讨厌的是,在亮度为 50% 或以下时,屏幕会出现明显的 PWM 闪烁,频率在 120 到 356 Hz 之间波动。由于缺少直流调光选项,敏感的人很可能会在这方面出现问题。因此,在购买前一定要对屏幕进行低亮度测试。

在 "标准 "配置文件下,色彩还原非常好,与参考值的偏差很小。

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.4 ms rise
↘ 1.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

在户外,即使是在明亮的夏日,明亮的显示屏也很容易阅读。

由于采用了 AMOLED 技术,从各个方向观看都能获得非常广阔的视角。

室外使用
室外使用
视角稳定性
视角稳定性

性能 - 性能良好的老式 SoC

联发科技的 Helio G96Redmi Note 12S 采用的是联发科 Helio G96 处理器。联发科的 Helio G96 处理器在 12S 中使用。 Redmi Note 11S的前身。尽管如此,目前的红米智能手机仍然证明了其强大的性能,并在对比设备中名列前茅。

在日常使用中,你不得不面对系统不时出现卡顿的情况,但总的来说,你可以很好地工作。在启动更复杂的应用程序时,您还需要忍受稍长的等待时间,但事实证明,Helio G96 总体上足以胜任许多任务。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=175, last 2 years)
1040 Points +96%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
642 Points +21%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
558 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
530 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
525 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (466 - 530, n=3)
508 Points -4%
Honor X8a
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
284 Points -46%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=175, last 2 years)
3474 Points +98%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
1954 Points +11%
Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (1688 - 1863, n=3)
1769 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1755 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1700 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1632 Points -7%
Honor X8a
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1132 Points -35%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=173, last 2 years)
1494 Points +120%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
680 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G96
  ()
680 Points 0%
Honor X8a
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
438 Points -36%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=173, last 2 years)
4189 Points +148%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1688 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G96
  ()
1688 Points 0%
Honor X8a
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1217 Points -28%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=104, last 2 years)
810694 Points +123%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
363022 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (297002 - 363022, n=2)
330012 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
317725 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
308581 Points -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
Points -100%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13174 Points +59%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10093 Points +22%
Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (8115 - 9209, n=3)
8540 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
8297 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8038 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
7953 Points -4%
Honor X8a
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
6789 Points -18%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=165, last 2 years)
917 Points +77%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
546 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
539 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
534 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
518 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (440 - 518, n=2)
479 Points -8%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)
6499 Points +112%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
3337 Points +9%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3236 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3072 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (2696 - 3072, n=2)
2884 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2825 Points -8%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)
10346 Points +82%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
6437 Points +13%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6157 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
5684 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
5508 Points -3%
Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (5016 - 5684, n=2)
5350 Points -6%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)
7058 Points +65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
4282 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
4065 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3991 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3782 Points -12%
Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (3280 - 4282, n=2)
3781 Points -12%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)
17998 Points +575%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
4001 Points +50%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2876 Points +8%
Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (2666 - 2763, n=2)
2715 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2676 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2666 Points
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)
1578 Points +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1372 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (1163 - 1372, n=2)
1268 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1263 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
1184 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1083 Points -21%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17814 Points +90%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
9380 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G96
  (9119 - 9380, n=2)
9250 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6303 Points -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
5395 Points -42%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
5242 Points -44%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
25319 Points +2911%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
949 Points +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mediatek Helio G96, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
841 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G96
  ()
841 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
424 Points -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, Adreno 619, 6144
Points -100%

Redmi Note 12S 的移动图形芯片无法流畅呈现 4K 游戏图形,但这个价位的其他智能手机也无法做到这一点。即使是全高清图形,你也必须运行不太复杂的游戏才能获得流畅的游戏体验。12Redmi Note 12 5G在这方面要强大得多。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
326 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
310 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
287 Points -12%
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
156 Points -52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
324 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
317 Points
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
293 Points -8%
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
188 Points -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1139 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1139 Points
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
973 Points -15%
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
622 Points -45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1191 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1160 Points
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
982 Points -15%
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
697 Points -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2901 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2846 Points +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2677 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2468 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2347 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2289 Points +5%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2232 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2178 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2413 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2393 Points +7%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2363 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2236 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3618 Points +14%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3387 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3231 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3174 Points
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2478 Points -22%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2590 Points +15%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2412 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2347 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2244 Points
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1231 Points -45%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2709 Points +13%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2638 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2546 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2400 Points
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1386 Points -42%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
103 fps +106%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps +16%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
50 fps
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
34 fps -32%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
85 fps +49%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
81 fps +42%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
64 fps +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
38 fps -33%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
68 fps +127%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps -10%
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
19 fps -37%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
43 fps +23%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
41 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
21 fps -40%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
55 fps +175%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps +25%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps -35%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps +41%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
29 fps +32%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps -41%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
29 fps +164%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps +36%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.4 fps -33%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
17 fps +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +31%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.7 fps -33%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps +141%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps +33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.3 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.9 fps -5%
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
4.8 fps -42%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8.9 fps +62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.1 fps +29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.5 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.3 fps -4%
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3.2 fps -42%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
31 fps +138%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps -8%
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.5 fps -42%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps +43%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
18 fps +29%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.2 fps -41%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.1 fps +55%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2.9 fps +45%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.3 fps +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2 fps
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1.5 fps -25%

就上网冲浪而言,Redmi Note 12S 在同价位手机中还算不错的选择。在浏览器基准测试中,它的速度通常快于同类智能手机,在日常使用中,网站加载速度也相当快。不过,你往往需要等待一段时间才能看到图片。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points +100%
Motorola Moto G53 (Chrome 111)
69.475 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S (Chrome 115)
62.192 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)
58.044 Points -7%
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (42.5 - 62.2, n=2)
52.4 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Chrome 112)
48.955 Points -21%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min +173%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S (Chrome 115)
52.7 runs/min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)
48.5 runs/min -8%
Motorola Moto G53 (Chrome 111)
47.78 runs/min -9%
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (34.4 - 52.7, n=2)
43.6 runs/min -17%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Chrome 112)
34.4 runs/min -35%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points +102%
Motorola Moto G53 (Chrome 111)
77 Points +33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)
68 Points +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S (Chrome 115)
58 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (2111)
50 Points -14%
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (42 - 58, n=2)
50 Points -14%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
150.2 Points +95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)
91 Points +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S (Chrome 115)
77 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (55 - 77, n=2)
66 Points -14%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points +94%
Motorola Moto G53 (Chrome 111)
20938 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S (Chrome 115)
19873 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)
19867 Points 0%
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (17394 - 19873, n=2)
18634 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Chrome 112)
15352 Points -23%
Honor X8a (Chrome 114)
9404 Points -53%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average Mediatek Helio G96 (2560 - 2773, n=2)
2667 ms * -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S (Chrome 115)
2560.2 ms *
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Chrome 112)
2337.2 ms * +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G (Chrome 113.0.5672.76)
2117.2 ms * +17%
Motorola Moto G53 (Chrome 111)
1829.3 ms * +29%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * +41%

* ... smaller is better

Redmi Note 12S 的 UFS 2.2 存储速度相当快。不过,如果配备相应的快速内存控制器,这种存储设备就能发挥更大的作用。三星Galaxy A14 5G所示。即便如此,Redmi Note 12S 仍能提供快速的数据传输和相对较短的加载时间。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12SHonor X8aXiaomi Redmi Note 12 5GMotorola Moto G53Samsung Galaxy A14 5GAverage 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-66%
-9%
-28%
13%
34%
138%
Sequential Read 256KB
518.7
278.1
-46%
520.09
0%
474.6
-9%
849.3
64%
Sequential Write 256KB
492.3
224.2
-54%
505.55
3%
243.87
-50%
469.83
-5%
Random Read 4KB
211.9
61.6
-71%
170.61
-19%
166.24
-22%
193.63
-9%
Random Write 4KB
202.6
18.7
-91%
161.26
-20%
139.83
-31%
204
1%

游戏 - 某些游戏只能达到 60 帧/秒

Redmi Note 12S 很少能在游戏中达到 60 帧/秒。虽然在快速 2D 射击游戏《Armajet》中可以达到 60 帧/秒,但偶尔也会出现帧数波动。

在《PUBG Mobile》中,在非常低的设置下,我们可以看到高达 40 帧的帧数,否则 30 帧是正常情况。帧率通过 GameBench 进行测量。

通过触摸屏和位置传感器进行控制的效果非常好。

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
暗黑破坏神:不朽
暗黑破坏神:不朽
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø59.1 (54-60)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.7.0: Ø39.7 (38-41)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.7.0: Ø29.8 (28-31)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S; Diablo Immortal; Medium Mobile Low; 2.0.2: Ø29.2 (24-31)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S; Diablo Immortal; Ultra Mobile Very High; 2.0.2: Ø29.4 (22-31)

排放 - 仅轻微节流

温度

智能手机的最高温度为 42.2 °C,在长时间负载的情况下会变得非常热,但不会达到临界温度,始终可以保持稳定。在长时间负载下,性能也保持稳定。同样的基准测试运行 20 次后,我们测得最高性能下降了 8%。

Max. Load
 42.2 °C36.7 °C33.8 °C 
 41.2 °C36.3 °C33.7 °C 
 40.8 °C36.3 °C33.8 °C 
Maximum: 42.2 °C
Average: 37.2 °C
35.2 °C36.8 °C40.6 °C
34.4 °C37 °C42.1 °C
32.8 °C37.1 °C40.3 °C
Maximum: 42.1 °C
Average: 37.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % +9%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
96.9 % +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
91.7 %
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
83 % -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
% -100%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 %
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98.8 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.4 % -1%
Honor X8a
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
81.8 % -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
Adreno 619, SD 4 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
% -100%
01234567Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.956 (1.948-1.968)
Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.011 (0.932-1.14)
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.755 (1.744-1.766)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.978 (1.957-1.988)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G96, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø6.91 (6.4-6.98)
Honor X8a Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.9 (3.73-4.49)
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø5.87 (5.72-5.9)
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø7.2 (7.18-7.21)
热成像,正面
热成像,正面
热成像,背面
热成像,背面

发言人

扬声器系统由位于底部边缘的主扬声器和作为第二扬声器的听筒组成,侧握手机时可产生轻微的立体声效果,声音重现相当清晰。不过,一旦加入乐器,两个扬声器就显得有点力不从心,变得不精确。声音也比较高亢,但即使开到最大音量也很少让人感到不舒服。

使用音频接口或蓝牙连接外接音频设备时,音效会更好。此外,小米还为无线音频传输提供了多种编解码器,包括 SBC、AAC、最重要的 aptX 编解码器、LDAC 和 LHDC(最高版本 5)。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.1372537.537.73131.429.64033.333.45032.132.66326.126.78020.219.710016.116.612514.917.21601329.62009.535.325010.541.331511.948.64008.154.3500959.163010.260.680013.963.7100012.264125011.866.7160011.470.7200010.671.7250011.372.231501271400012.773.2500013.468.6630014.161.9800014.864.21000015.768.51250016.464.51600017.354.3SPL24.981.3N0.646.4median 12.2median 63.7Delta1.911.529.635.63031.224.530.625.833.237.536.825.232.820.236.620.436.317.537.514.439.914.341.915.247.411.951.113.55712.165.512.466.511.770.111.874.511.477.212.376.112.276.712.178.112.28012.979.313.478.513.281.612.98213.682.513.479.313.26524.890.40.681.3median 12.9median 76.10.911.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 12SSamsung Galaxy A14 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A14 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 长时间运行

耗电量

Redmi Note 12S 电池在低负荷时几乎不需要任何能量,但在重负荷时耗电量可高达 8.6 瓦。

一旦电池耗尽,充电功率可达 33 瓦。幸运的是,小米在低价位产品中提供了快速充电技术,这意味着Redmi Note 12S 在电池完全耗尽的情况下可在 1:45 小时内完成充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1 / 1.3 / 1.5 Watt
Load midlight 5.8 / 8.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G53
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
5000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio G96
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
0%
4%
0%
2%
-7%
Idle Minimum *
1
0.99
1%
0.8
20%
0.64
36%
0.945 ?(0.89 - 1, n=2)
5%
Idle Average *
1.3
1.98
-52%
1.5
-15%
2.1
-62%
1.585 ?(1.3 - 1.87, n=2)
-22%
Idle Maximum *
1.5
2.02
-35%
2
-33%
2.17
-45%
1.7 ?(1.5 - 1.9, n=2)
-13%
Load Average *
5.8
3.35
42%
4.6
21%
3.73
36%
4.41 ?(3.01 - 5.8, n=2)
24%
Load Maximum *
8.6
4.72
45%
6.3
27%
5.44
37%
7.43 ?(6.26 - 8.6, n=2)
14%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.3 (1.021-8.59)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.189 (1.035-1.437)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.11 (3.79-6.42)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.189 (1.035-1.437)

电池寿命

我们还通过各种电池测试检验了日常使用中的电池寿命。最重要的是我们的 WLAN 测试,它模拟了日常互联网使用。这款智能手机的续航时间接近 16 小时,因此在同价位手机中取得了不错的成绩。在同价位手机中处于中游水平。

考虑到可能的高消耗率,近 6 小时的负载时间也是一个不错的值,因此节能功能似乎发挥了作用。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
29h 56min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 22min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 56min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S
5000 mAh
Honor X8a
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 5G
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G53
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-3%
-7%
8%
13%
Reader / Idle
1796
1668
-7%
2301
28%
2558
42%
H.264
1042
1065
2%
1165
12%
1111
7%
WiFi v1.3
953
927
-3%
645
-32%
1035
9%
1029
8%
Load
356
388
9%
297
-17%
340
-4%

Pros

+ 坚固的外壳
+ 小巧轻便
+ 明亮的 AMOLED 屏幕
+ 电池寿命长
+ 快速充电技术
+ 大量存储空间

Cons

- PWM 闪烁
- 定位不准确
- 系统充斥广告
- 无 5G

评价:紧凑型中端产品,屏幕明亮

回顾:小米Redmi Note 12S。
回顾:小米Redmi Note 12S。

如果你正在寻找一款体积小巧、续航时间长且屏幕出色的智能手机,那么小米Redmi Note 12S 应该是你的首选。

这款手机的外壳并不出众,软件广告偶尔也很烦人,扬声器系统也很一般。但这款智能手机确实具有良好的存储容量、不错的照片质量、灵活的应用程序选项和快速充电功能。

在性能方面,这款智能手机与同类产品相当,但尽管存储速度很快,你也不得不忍受偶尔的延迟。AMOLED 屏幕缺乏直流调光功能可能会让敏感的用户感到不舒服,因为它在低亮度时会强烈闪烁。

小米Redmi Note 12S 是一款拥有大量存储空间和明亮 AMOLED 屏幕的紧凑型智能手机。

如果用户不想没有 5G,而且手机大小不是最重要的标准,也可以购买小米Redmi Note 12 5G.三星 三星Galaxy A14 5G同样小巧,但存储空间要小得多。

价格和供应情况

在美国亚马逊,买家可以购买小米Redmi Note 12S 的 256 GB 版本,有冰蓝色(219.50 美元)、玛瑙黑(217.00 美元)或珍珠绿(214.00 美元)三种颜色。

价格截至 2023 年 8 月 8 日,可能会有变动。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S - 08/07/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
81%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
90%
Connectivity
46 / 70 → 66%
Weight
90%
Battery
91%
Display
92%
Games Performance
24 / 64 → 38%
Application Performance
69 / 86 → 81%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
64 / 90 → 71%
Camera
60%
Average
74%
80%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米Redmi Note 12S 智能手机评测:轻巧、廉价、OLED 屏幕
Florian Schmitt, 2023-08- 8 (Update: 2024-08-15)