Notebookcheck Logo

Robo and Kala TW220 二合一 OLED 平板电脑评测:超越微软 Surface Go 3

Windows 11 + Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3。

不管人们是否喜欢,Windows ARM 都将继续存在,不管人们如何批评。Robo & Kala TW220 直接瞄准了微软 Surface Pro 9 ARM,提供 OLED 而不是 IPS,而且起价更低,仅为 599 美元。
ARM Convertible / 2-in-1 Windows Tablet
机器人和卡拉 TW220 2 合 1
机器人和卡拉 TW220 2 合 1

TW220 是美籍华人公司 Robo and Kala 最新推出的 Windows 11 旗舰平板电脑。它是极少数采用 ARM SoC 的 Windows 平板电脑之一,更不用说采用 高通骁龙 8cx Gen 3集成 Adreno 690 图形处理器。因此,它直接与微软 Surface 系列产品竞争,包括最近推出的 Surface Pro 9 ARM采用了完全相同的高通处理器。

除了不常见的 SoC 之外,它的规格也像一款高端平板电脑,包括 16:10 2560 x 1600 OLED 触摸屏(98% DCI-P3 色彩)、16 GB LPDDR4X 内存、512 GB NVMe 固态硬盘和可拆卸键盘底座,售价 599 美元,比一般采用酷睿处理器的 Surface Pro 便宜数百美元。

Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 8 x 2.4 - 3 GHz, Cortex-X1 / A78
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 690
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
12.60 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 240 PPI, 10-point capacitive, native pen support, Sharp RM69380, AMOLED, SHP2058, glossy: yes, detachable screen, 60 Hz
Storage
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G, 512 GB 
Connections
2 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, E-Compass, Hall, Gyroscope, Temperature, ALS/PS
Networking
Qualcomm WCN685x (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.3 x 284.7 x 187.5
Battery
41 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix 2160p30
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix 1080p30
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Keyboard base, Stylus, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
712 g, Power Supply: 350 g
Price
600 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
82.1 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
712 g7.3 mm12.60"2560x1600
88.4 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2023
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
877 g9.3 mm13.00"2880x1920
86.9 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
883 g9.3 mm13.00"2880x1920
85.3 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
i3-10100Y, UHD Graphics 615
783 g8.3 mm10.50"1920x1280
88.6 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2022
Apple iPad 10
A14, A14 Bionic GPU
477 g7 mm10.90"2360x1640
92.5 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2022
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022
M2, M2 10-Core GPU
466 g5.9 mm11.00"2388x1668

平板电脑本身重 712 克,键盘底座重 350 克,总重 1.06 千克。它比大多数甚至所有 Surface 型号都要轻,包括较小的Surface Go 3.

光滑的铝合金背面手感优质,但也易碎
光滑的铝合金背面手感优质,但也易碎
键盘底座底部为人造皮革
键盘底座底部为人造皮革
内置支架和铰链牢固,不会摇晃
内置支架和铰链牢固,不会摇晃
键盘底座有两种连接模式:物理或蓝牙
键盘底座有两种连接模式:物理或蓝牙
铰链的开启角度可达 ~170 度
铰链的开启角度可达 ~170 度
平板电脑左右两边的立体声扬声器
平板电脑左右两边的立体声扬声器

尺寸比较

287 mm 209 mm 9.3 mm 877 g287 mm 209 mm 9.3 mm 883 g284.7 mm 187.5 mm 7.3 mm 712 g248.6 mm 179.5 mm 7 mm 477 g247.6 mm 178.5 mm 5.9 mm 466 g245 mm 175 mm 8.3 mm 783 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性

两个 USB-C 端口分别支持 DisplayPort 和充电。我们能够以 8 位色深输出最高 4K 和 60 Hz 的图像。没有耳机插孔。

顶部:无端口
顶部:无端口
左: 2x USB-C w/ DisplayPort + Power Delivery,扬声器
左: 2x USB-C w/ DisplayPort + Power Delivery,扬声器
底部键盘底座连接插针
底部键盘底座连接插针
对扬声器
对扬声器

交流

高通 WCN685x 是 Wi-Fi 6 和 Wi-Fi 6E 连接的标准配置。在与华硕 AXE11000 6 GHz 网络配对时,我们没有遇到任何问题。

网络摄像头

TW220 的网络摄像头分辨率为 1300 万像素,比以下两款产品的网络摄像头分辨率都要高 Surface Pro 9(10 MP)和 Surface Go 3(800 万像素)都要高。内置的红外摄像头支持 Windows Hello,但没有隐私快门。

ColorChecker
13.4 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
11 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
6 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1: 8.35 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 16.36 ∆E

配件和保修

零售包装盒包括背光可移动键盘底座和 4096 级压力智能笔。键盘底座有自己的内置电池,可以通过蓝牙无线连接到平板电脑,也可以通过连接插针物理连接到平板电脑。键盘底座没有集成任何端口,因此只能在与平板电脑物理连接时才能充电。

制造商提供标准的一年有限保修服务。

输入设备

键盘

平板电脑的可拆卸键盘几乎总是不如传统笔记本电脑的键盘。不过,TW220 的键盘其实还不错。按键反馈均匀、清晰,1.3 毫米的键程是标准配置。遗憾的是,按键感觉有些僵硬,手指需要花更大的力气才能按下并记录输入。

触摸板

点击板的尺寸为 11 x 6.5 厘米,比 Surface Pro 键盘上 10.2 x 5.8 厘米的点击板要大。点击时的反馈较浅,但比大多数笔记本电脑更有力。不过,咔哒声随后会变得尖锐而响亮。

QWERTY 布局。蓝牙连接键靠近右上角
QWERTY 布局。蓝牙连接键靠近右上角
中速或高速时滑行平稳,慢速时稍显粘滞
中速或高速时滑行平稳,慢速时稍显粘滞
白色背光启动时,所有按键和符号都会亮起
白色背光启动时,所有按键和符号都会亮起
拥挤的方向键
拥挤的方向键

显示屏 - OLED

来自光泽覆盖层的清晰 OLED 子像素阵列
来自光泽覆盖层的清晰 OLED 子像素阵列

TW220 是我们数据库中第一款采用夏普 RM69380 OLED 面板的设备,与之形成鲜明对比的是 LG 飞利浦 LP129WT2 或京东方 NV105WAM IPS 面板。Surface Pro 9或 Surface Go 3 分别采用的是 LG Philips LP129WT2 或 BOE NV105WAM IPS 面板。与 IPS 相比,OLED 具有固有的优势,包括更快的黑白响应时间以减少重影、更深的黑阶、更宽的色彩范围和更好的亮度均匀性。

边对边玻璃
边对边玻璃
边框比 Surface 系列更窄
边框比 Surface 系列更窄
560.7
cd/m²
554.3
cd/m²
563.7
cd/m²
569.5
cd/m²
568.7
cd/m²
574.8
cd/m²
584.7
cd/m²
579.6
cd/m²
599.4
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Sharp RM69380 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 599.4 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 572.8 cd/m² Minimum: 5.45 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 568.7 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.07 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 7.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.19
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Sharp RM69380, AMOLED, 2560x1600, 12.6"
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
LP129WT2-SPA6, IPS, 2880x1920, 13"
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
NV105WAM-N31, IPS , 1920x1280, 10.5"
Apple iPad 10
Liquid Retina, IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9"
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022
IPS, 2388x1668, 11"
Display
Display P3 Coverage
65.6
69
sRGB Coverage
97.7
99.1
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
67.7
69.8
Response Times
15980%
-327%
-1336%
-1360%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
13 ?(6, 7)
-442%
37.2 ?(18.4, 18.8)
-1450%
42.68 ?(21.08, 21.6)
-1678%
43 ?(23, 20)
-1692%
Response Time Black / White *
2.04 ?(0.84, 1.2)
19.4 ?(6.8, 12.6)
-851%
22.8 ?(10.4, 12.4)
-1018%
22.31 ?(10.08, 12.23)
-994%
23 ?(12, 11)
-1027%
PWM Frequency
60.6 ?(100)
29896 ?(55)
49233%
962 ?(94)
1487%
Screen
30%
30%
30%
38%
Brightness middle
568.7
455
-20%
418
-26%
467
-18%
620
9%
Brightness
573
453
-21%
415
-28%
468
-18%
611
7%
Brightness Distribution
92
94
2%
90
-2%
92
0%
93
1%
Black Level *
0.38
0.28
0.49
0.37
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.07
1.7
72%
1.2
80%
1.4
77%
1.49
75%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
11.12
3.8
66%
2.6
77%
3.3
70%
3.67
67%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
7.4
1.5
80%
1.8
76%
2.3
69%
2.3
69%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.17 101%
2.21 100%
2.21 100%
2.211 100%
CCT
7211 90%
6761 96%
6225 104%
6852 95%
6849 95%
Contrast
1197
1493
953
1676
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.5
1
Total Average (Program / Settings)
8005% / 5347%
-149% / -89%
-653% / -312%
-661% / -311%

* ... smaller is better

尽管显示屏是高质量的 OLED 面板,但并没有经过预校准。它的目标色温是 P3,但过冷的色温意味着在饱和度较低时色彩不准确,正如我们下面的 CalMAN 测量结果所示。

灰度 (P3)
灰度 (P3)
饱和扫描 (P3)
饱和扫描 (P3)
颜色检查器 (P3)
颜色检查器 (P3)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.84 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 60.6 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 60.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 60.6 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在所有亮度级别(包括 100% 设置)下都会出现闪烁。我们能检测到 60 Hz 的闪烁,这与大多数其他配备 OLED 显示屏的平板电脑、笔记本电脑或智能手机的情况类似。

100% 亮度
100% 亮度
75% 亮度
75% 亮度
50% 亮度
50% 亮度
25% 亮度
25% 亮度
0% 亮度
0% 亮度

实际上,Robo 和 Kala 的显示屏比 Surface Pro 9 或 Surface Go 3 的显示屏亮度要高出 25% 到 35%。不过,还是建议在阴凉处工作,以减少眩光,最大限度地提高色彩鲜艳度。

户外阳光下
户外阳光下
室外阴凉处
室外阴凉处
户外阳光下
户外阳光下
OLED 视角宽广,纵向和横向观看都很舒适。如果从极端角度观看,会出现彩虹效果
OLED 视角宽广,纵向和横向观看都很舒适。如果从极端角度观看,会出现彩虹效果

性能 - 多线程情况下比酷睿 i3 更快

 
 

测试条件

在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 设置为性能模式。值得注意的是,许多应用程序都无法在 Windows ARM 上启动,包括我们常用的许多基准测试应用程序。LatencyMon、PCMark 10、3DMark、i1Profiler、BaseMark、Geekbench 5.4、GPUScore Sacred Path、3DMark 06、HWiNFO 传感器读数和某些 Windows 批次文件只是我们在测试过程中遇到问题的部分应用程序。

处理器

原始多线程性能始终领先于三年前的酷睿 i5-1035G1而单线程工作负载则恰恰相反。4K 编码或 Blender 等高要求任务的运行速度比酷睿 i5 慢,这意味着高级用户仍应考虑使用酷睿 i7 微软 Surface Pro。至少 骁龙 8cx Gen 3要比速度慢得令人发指的 Surface Go 2.

在 Prime95 下运行时,CPU 时钟频率在最初几秒内会高达 2.7 GHz,几分钟后才会下降并稳定在 2.1 GHz。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop (copy 1)

0801602403204004805606407208008809601040112012001280136014401520Tooltip
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3: Ø662 (638.44-723.37)
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U: Ø1293 (1168.77-1576.35)
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 Intel Core i5-1135G7: Ø530 (512.05-672.11)
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 Intel Core i3-10100Y: Ø219 (217.41-220.31)
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 Intel Core i5-1035G1: Ø470 (466.1-527.11)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U
90.5 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U
69.5 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7
60.9 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
58.5 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB -6!
Intel Core i5-8250U
51.3 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 -2!
Intel Core i5-1035G1
47.9 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
37.8 pt
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
37.7 pt
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
 
35.9 pt
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y -2!
Intel Core m3-8100Y
27.2 pt
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
Intel Core i3-10100Y
26.2 pt
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 -9!
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
16.8 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U
9517 Points +157%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U
7073 Points +91%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4125 Points +11%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
3948 Points +6%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
3709 (3346.83min - 3709.07max) Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
  (3534 - 3709, n=3)
3603 Points -3%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
3567 Points -4%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
Intel Core i3-10100Y
1375 Points -63%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U
1656 Points +196%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1316 Points +135%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1305 Points +133%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U
1163 Points +108%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
Intel Core i3-10100Y
788 Points +41%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
608 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
  (559 - 608, n=3)
588 Points +5%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
559 Points
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U
3616 Points +187%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U
2478 Points +97%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1573 Points +25%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1519 Points +21%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
1258 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
1248 Points -1%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1
1178 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
  (810 - 1258, n=3)
1105 Points -12%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
Intel Core i3-10100Y
536 Points -57%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y
527 Points -58%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U
638 Points +211%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
506 Points +147%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7
501 Points +144%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U
451 Points +120%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1
413 Points +101%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
Intel Core i3-10100Y
303 Points +48%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y
298 Points +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
  (199 - 222, n=3)
209 Points +2%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
205 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
199 Points -3%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U
1576 (1168.77min - 1576.35max) Points +118%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U
1291 (1037.83min - 1290.53max) Points +79%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7
784 Points +8%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
774 (640.9min - 773.99max) Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
  (723 - 774, n=2)
749 Points +4%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
723 (638.44min - 723.37max) Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
672 (512.05min - 672.11max) Points -7%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Intel Core i5-8250U
585 Points -19%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1
527 (466.1min - 527.11max) Points -27%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y
247 (213.96min - 218.42max) Points -66%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
Intel Core i3-10100Y
220 (217.41min - 220.31max) Points -70%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
164 Points -77%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U
222 Points +87%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
193.7 Points +63%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7
188 Points +58%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U
170 Points +43%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1
161 Points +35%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Intel Core i5-8250U
143 Points +20%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
Intel Core i3-10100Y
122 Points +3%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y
121 Points +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
119.1 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
  (119 - 119.1, n=2)
119.1 Points 0%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
119 Points
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
65 Points -45%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y
1893 Seconds * -75%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
Intel Core i3-10100Y
1825 Seconds * -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
  (1059 - 1600, n=3)
1246 Seconds * -15%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Intel Core i5-8250U
1209 Seconds * -12%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
1080 Seconds *
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
1059 Seconds * +2%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1
944 Seconds * +13%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
840 Seconds * +22%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7
735 Seconds * +32%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U
458 Seconds * +58%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U
382 Seconds * +65%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U
37320 MIPS +56%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U
32745 MIPS +37%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
24505 MIPS +2%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
23989 MIPS
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7
22950 MIPS -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
  (16223 - 24505, n=3)
21572 MIPS -10%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
18197 MIPS -24%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Intel Core i5-8250U
17405 MIPS -27%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1
13715 MIPS -43%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
Intel Core i3-10100Y
8262 MIPS -66%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y
7554 MIPS -69%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U
5150 MIPS +32%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4586 MIPS +17%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4313 MIPS +10%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U
4077 MIPS +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
3946 MIPS +1%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1
3932 MIPS 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Intel Core i5-8250U
3925 MIPS 0%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
3915 MIPS
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
  (3874 - 3946, n=3)
3912 MIPS 0%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
Intel Core i3-10100Y
3535 MIPS -10%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y
3282 MIPS -16%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U
10.1 fps +277%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U
7.66 fps +186%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7
6.09 fps +127%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4.94 fps +84%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Intel Core i5-8250U
4.78 fps +78%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1
3.89 fps +45%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
2.68 fps
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
2.52 fps -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
  (1.5 - 2.68, n=3)
2.23 fps -17%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
Intel Core i3-10100Y
2.01 fps -25%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y
1.96 fps -27%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
1.09 fps -59%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
121.5 s * -3%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
Intel Core i3-10100Y
119 s * -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
  (115.5 - 121.5, n=3)
118.2 s * -1%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
117.6 s *
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y
85.4 s * +27%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U
73.2 s * +38%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1
64.5 s * +45%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
57.8 s * +51%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7
57.2 s * +51%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U
51.3 s * +56%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
1.013 sec * -0%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
1.012 sec *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
  (1.011 - 1.013, n=3)
1.012 sec * -0%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
Intel Core i3-10100Y
0.962 sec * +5%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y
0.942 sec * +7%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1
0.743 sec * +27%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7
0.68 sec * +33%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U
0.677 sec * +33%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
0.653 sec * +35%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U
0.52 sec * +49%
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
723 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
14 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
119 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1258 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
205 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
559 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
3709 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U, Vega 7
90.2 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
87.6 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
69.2 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
56.3 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
32.1 pt
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
31.2 pt
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
 
28 pt
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y, UHD Graphics 615
21.6 pt
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 -9!
Intel Core i3-10100Y, UHD Graphics 615
0 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U, Vega 7
9167 KRay/s +260%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
8127 KRay/s +219%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
6545 KRay/s +157%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
5346 KRay/s +110%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
2627 KRay/s +3%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
2548 KRay/s
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y, UHD Graphics 615
2181 KRay/s -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
  (343 - 2627, n=3)
1839 KRay/s -28%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U, Vega 7
50584 Points +268%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
41353 Points +201%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
27865 Points +103%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
22472 Points +64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
  (13729 - 14650, n=3)
14164 Points +3%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
14113 Points +3%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
13729 Points
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y, UHD Graphics 615
9970 Points -27%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2089 MB/s +90%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1847 MB/s +68%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U, Vega 7
1629 MB/s +48%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1460 MB/s +32%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
1144 MB/s +4%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
1102 MB/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
  (453 - 1144, n=3)
900 MB/s -18%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y, UHD Graphics 615
519 MB/s -53%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U, Vega 7
72574 Points +167%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
65820 Points +142%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
44541 Points +64%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
39000 Points +43%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
27474 Points +1%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
27210 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
  (15447 - 27474, n=3)
23377 Points -14%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y, UHD Graphics 615
18058 Points -34%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U, Vega 7
10151 Points +774%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5095 Points +339%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
4316 Points +272%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
3635 Points +213%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y, UHD Graphics 615
1622 Points +40%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
1257 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
  (1161 - 1257, n=3)
1214 Points +5%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
1161 Points
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U, Vega 7
26412 Points +273%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
19899 Points +181%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
17074 Points +141%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
13695 Points +93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
  (7085 - 7704, n=3)
7318 Points +3%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
7166 Points +1%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
7085 Points
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y, UHD Graphics 615
5123 Points -28%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
42553 MB/s +3237%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
37654 MB/s +2853%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U, Vega 7
33200 MB/s +2504%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
28988 MB/s +2174%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y, UHD Graphics 615
6139 MB/s +381%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
1279 MB/s 0%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
1275 MB/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
  (638 - 1279, n=3)
1064 MB/s -17%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U, Vega 7
592 MB/s +44%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
588 MB/s +43%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
412 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
411 MB/s 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
  (398 - 412, n=3)
407 MB/s -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
296 MB/s -28%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
283 MB/s -31%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y, UHD Graphics 615
119 MB/s -71%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
Intel Core i3-10100Y, UHD Graphics 615
0 MB/s -100%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U, Vega 7
4894 KRay/s +334%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4400 KRay/s +290%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
3565 KRay/s +216%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
2807 KRay/s +149%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
1379 KRay/s +22%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
1127 KRay/s
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y, UHD Graphics 615
1027 KRay/s -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
  (204 - 1379, n=3)
903 KRay/s -20%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
44054 MPixel/s +201%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
42654 MPixel/s +191%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
33194 MPixel/s +126%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U, Vega 7
20098 MPixel/s +37%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
14660 MPixel/s
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y, UHD Graphics 615
14007 MPixel/s -4%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
13965 MPixel/s -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
  (7622 - 14660, n=3)
12082 MPixel/s -18%

系统性能

主观而言,Windows 11 在骁龙 SoC 上运行流畅,反应灵敏,测试过程中没有出现 BSOD。尽管如此,请记住大多数应用程序都是通过模拟运行的,因此出现不兼容的几率很高。

操作系统导航不如大多数Android 平板电脑流畅,部分原因是显示屏的刷新率为 60 Hz。如今,大多数平板电脑已经采用了刷新率更高的显示屏,如联想 P11 的 120 Hz 显示屏。 联想 P11.

CrossMark / Overall
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
1499 Points +139%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1154 Points +84%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
997 Points +59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
  (627 - 718, n=2)
673 Points +7%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Adreno 690, SD 8cx Gen 3, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
627 Points
CrossMark / Productivity
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
1465 Points +150%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1180 Points +101%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1028 Points +75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
  (586 - 685, n=2)
636 Points +9%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Adreno 690, SD 8cx Gen 3, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
586 Points
CrossMark / Creativity
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
1612 Points +118%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1177 Points +59%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
938 Points +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
  (740 - 776, n=2)
758 Points +2%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Adreno 690, SD 8cx Gen 3, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
740 Points
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
1293 Points +176%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1172 Points +150%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1014 Points +117%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
  (468 - 652, n=2)
560 Points +20%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Adreno 690, SD 8cx Gen 3, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
468 Points
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
67017 MB/s +57%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
60661 MB/s +42%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
53093 MB/s +24%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
42710 MB/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
  (40599 - 42710, n=3)
41534 MB/s -3%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
40599 MB/s -5%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U, Vega 7
37198 MB/s -13%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y, UHD Graphics 615
26621 MB/s -38%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
59579 MB/s +78%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
55543 MB/s +66%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
54405 MB/s +62%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U, Vega 7
44646 MB/s +33%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
33550 MB/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
  (33013 - 33757, n=3)
33440 MB/s 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
33013 MB/s -2%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y, UHD Graphics 615
26573 MB/s -21%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
63350 MB/s +27%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
62132 MB/s +25%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
58060 MB/s +17%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
49815 MB/s 0%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
49785 MB/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
  (49100 - 49815, n=3)
49567 MB/s 0%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U, Vega 7
39104 MB/s -21%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y, UHD Graphics 615
27955 MB/s -44%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U, Vega 7
122 ns * -1084%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
101.2 ns * -883%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
98.6 ns * -857%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
92.2 ns * -795%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y, UHD Graphics 615
75.5 ns * -633%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
  (10.2 - 18.8, n=3)
13.1 ns * -27%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
10.3 ns *
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690
10.2 ns * +1%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
Intel Core i3-10100Y, UHD Graphics 615
0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

系统随附 东芝 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G这是一款经济型 PCIe4 x4 NVMe 固态硬盘。即使在长时间的压力下,该硬盘也能维持略高于 2000 MB/s 的读取速率。

CDM 8
CDM 8
AS 固态硬盘
AS 固态硬盘
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2830 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2658 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 92.63 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 240.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1458 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1317 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 29.04 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 54.4 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
86.7 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
68.9 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
67.2 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
 
61 pt
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
59.6 pt
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
58.2 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
57.8 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
47.3 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro X -8!
256 GB NVMe
44.2 pt
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR
42.3 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB -8!
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
25.3 pt
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 -8!
64 GB eMMC Flash
18.4 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
2492 (2463.73min - 2492.26max) MB/s +54%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1733 (1685.29min - 1733.41max) MB/s +7%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1615 (1539.8min - 1615.14max) MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
 
1216 (1188.74min - 1215.93max) MB/s -25%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
1196 (1171.47min - 1195.92max) MB/s -26%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
973 (832.58min - 972.6max) MB/s -40%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR
941 (931.35min - 940.99max) MB/s -42%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
905 (897.16min - 905.05max) MB/s -44%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
890 (866.12min - 889.5max) MB/s -45%
seq write
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
1954 (1874.02min - 1954.13max) MB/s +43%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
 
1466 (1421.15min - 1466.12max) MB/s +8%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1362 (1291.49min - 1362.1max) MB/s
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1283 (1167.69min - 1283.04max) MB/s -6%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
947 (935.52min - 946.87max) MB/s -30%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
855 (766.36min - 854.83max) MB/s -37%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
803 (741.97min - 803.21max) MB/s -41%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
650 (625.17min - 649.95max) MB/s -52%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR
431 (372.99min - 431.38max) MB/s -68%
seq q8 t1 read
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
3499 (2732.17min - 3499.31max) MB/s +58%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
 
2620 (2449.47min - 2619.97max) MB/s +18%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
2347 (2059.33min - 2347.42max) MB/s +6%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2216 (2184.81min - 2216.06max) MB/s
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
2147 (1698.69min - 2146.76max) MB/s -3%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
1989 (1806.32min - 1989.15max) MB/s -10%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
1905 (1447.5min - 1905.47max) MB/s -14%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR
1630 (1381.18min - 1629.7max) MB/s -26%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
1616 (1359.37min - 1615.77max) MB/s -27%
seq q8 t1 write
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2665 (2452.83min - 2665.39max) MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
2410 (2398.51min - 2410.26max) MB/s -10%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
 
1620 (1607.05min - 1619.51max) MB/s -39%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1575 (1464.65min - 1574.75max) MB/s -41%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
1076 (1035.57min - 1076.31max) MB/s -60%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
1002 (988.9min - 1002.14max) MB/s -62%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
847 (788min - 847.44max) MB/s -68%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
796 (698.28min - 795.57max) MB/s -70%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR
377 (317.93min - 376.56max) MB/s -86%
4k q1 t1 read
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
79.7 (72.36min - 79.71max) MB/s +98%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
54.7 (53.72min - 54.65max) MB/s +36%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
49.3 (48.49min - 49.3max) MB/s +22%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
47.1 (46.88min - 47.11max) MB/s +17%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
40.4 (35.69min - 40.39max) MB/s 0%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
40.3 (37.24min - 40.31max) MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
 
39 (33.35min - 38.96max) MB/s -3%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
38.6 (38.35min - 38.57max) MB/s -4%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR
38 (37.81min - 38.01max) MB/s -6%
4k q1 t1 write
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
167 (164.84min - 166.66max) MB/s +238%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
130.5 (125.43min - 130.5max) MB/s +164%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
125.6 (122.85min - 125.61max) MB/s +154%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
106 (101.86min - 106.41max) MB/s +115%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
105 (102.24min - 104.98max) MB/s +113%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR
93.8 (90.08min - 93.75max) MB/s +90%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
89 (88.35min - 88.96max) MB/s +80%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
49.4 (45.37min - 49.4max) MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
 
48.4 (39.33min - 48.35max) MB/s -2%
4k q32 t16 read
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
940 (836.17min - 940.19max) MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
 
774 (729.42min - 773.82max) MB/s -18%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
665 (643min - 665.11max) MB/s -29%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
660 (650.99min - 659.77max) MB/s -30%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
586 (580.54min - 585.78max) MB/s -38%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
583 (579.13min - 582.59max) MB/s -38%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
565 (550.55min - 565.06max) MB/s -40%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
408 (402.61min - 407.79max) MB/s -57%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR
303 (302.34min - 303.25max) MB/s -68%
4k q32 t16 write
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
464 (458.75min - 463.59max) MB/s +19%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
389 (371.31min - 389.3max) MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
 
371 (347.99min - 371.14max) MB/s -5%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
355 (303.76min - 354.58max) MB/s -9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
354 (346.58min - 354.16max) MB/s -9%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
278 (263.54min - 278.35max) MB/s -29%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
264 (245.36min - 264.37max) MB/s -32%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
254 (231.94min - 253.88max) MB/s -35%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR
248 (172.42min - 247.51max) MB/s -36%
AS SSD
Score Total
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
3179 Points +130%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
2783 Points +102%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
2616 Points +89%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
2398 Points +74%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
2155 Points +56%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
 
1699 Points +23%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
1458 Points +6%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1381 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro X
256 GB NVMe
1371 Points -1%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR
1078 Points -22%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
870 Points -37%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
64 GB eMMC Flash
225 Points -84%
Score Read
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
1747 Points +230%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
1093 Points +106%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
964 Points +82%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
885 Points +67%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
841 Points +59%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
656 Points +24%
Microsoft Surface Pro X
256 GB NVMe
639 Points +21%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
530 Points
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR
526 Points -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
 
476 Points -10%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
430 Points -19%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
64 GB eMMC Flash
88 Points -83%
Score Write
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
1551 Points +153%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
 
1021 Points +67%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
992 Points +62%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
983 Points +61%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
858 Points +40%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
612 Points
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
578 Points -6%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
498 Points -19%
Microsoft Surface Pro X
256 GB NVMe
453 Points -26%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR
316 Points -48%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
244 Points -60%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
64 GB eMMC Flash
92 Points -85%
Seq Read
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
2802 MB/s +23%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
 
2318 MB/s +2%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2269.2 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1942 MB/s -14%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
1725 MB/s -24%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
1687 MB/s -26%
Microsoft Surface Pro X
256 GB NVMe
1413 MB/s -38%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
1347 MB/s -41%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
1313 MB/s -42%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR
1291 MB/s -43%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
1114 MB/s -51%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
64 GB eMMC Flash
289.8 MB/s -87%
Seq Write
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
1692 MB/s +17%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1451 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
 
1233 MB/s -15%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
931 MB/s -36%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
777 MB/s -46%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
675 MB/s -53%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
491 MB/s -66%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
477 MB/s -67%
Microsoft Surface Pro X
256 GB NVMe
393 MB/s -73%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR
377 MB/s -74%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
340 MB/s -77%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
64 GB eMMC Flash
126.7 MB/s -91%
4K Read
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
54.67 MB/s +90%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
51.17 MB/s +78%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
50.1 MB/s +74%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
45.54 MB/s +59%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
40.46 MB/s +41%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
40.1 MB/s +40%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
38.08 MB/s +33%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR
36.76 MB/s +28%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
 
34.2 MB/s +19%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
28.72 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro X
256 GB NVMe
21.09 MB/s -27%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
64 GB eMMC Flash
18.29 MB/s -36%
4K Write
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
165.43 MB/s +154%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
147.09 MB/s +126%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
136.9 MB/s +110%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
110.3 MB/s +69%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
108.3 MB/s +66%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
98.2 MB/s +51%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR
93.4 MB/s +43%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
80.6 MB/s +24%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
 
66.4 MB/s +2%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
65.2 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro X
256 GB NVMe
49.85 MB/s -24%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
64 GB eMMC Flash
35.07 MB/s -46%
4K-64 Read
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
1570 MB/s +471%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
870 MB/s +217%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
715.5 MB/s +160%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
676 MB/s +146%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
509.42 MB/s +85%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
483.1 MB/s +76%
Microsoft Surface Pro X
256 GB NVMe
477 MB/s +74%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR
360.4 MB/s +31%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
277.9 MB/s +1%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
274.83 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
 
210 MB/s -24%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
64 GB eMMC Flash
40.27 MB/s -85%
4K-64 Write
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
1234.89 MB/s +208%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
 
832 MB/s +107%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
762 MB/s +90%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
739.5 MB/s +84%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
680 MB/s +69%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
421.8 MB/s +5%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
401.49 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro X
256 GB NVMe
363.5 MB/s -9%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
350.9 MB/s -13%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR
184.7 MB/s -54%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
129.3 MB/s -68%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
64 GB eMMC Flash
44.48 MB/s -89%
Access Time Read
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
0.913 ms * -460%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
0.279 ms * -71%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
0.179 ms * -10%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
0.163 ms *
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
64 GB eMMC Flash
0.151 ms * +7%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
0.096 ms * +41%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
 
0.062 ms * +62%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
0.057 ms * +65%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR
0.053 ms * +67%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
0.05 ms * +69%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
0.041 ms * +75%
Microsoft Surface Pro X
256 GB NVMe
0 ms * +100%
Access Time Write
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
0.301 ms * -68%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
64 GB eMMC Flash
0.233 ms * -30%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
0.179 ms * -0%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
0.179 ms *
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
0.171 ms * +4%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
0.105 ms * +41%
Microsoft Surface Pro X
256 GB NVMe
0.076 ms * +58%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
 
0.059 ms * +67%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR
0.043 ms * +76%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
0.035 ms * +80%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
0.03 ms * +83%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ256HBJQ
0.028 ms * +84%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

01102203304405506607708809901100121013201430154016501760187019802090Tooltip
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1: Ø2101 (2017.83-2195.1)

图形处理器性能

用户不应指望集成的 Adreno 690的性能超过普通 Iris XeRadeon RX Vega 系列因为它的功耗更低,而且采用被动冷却方式。即便如此,3DMark 11 显示高通公司的 GPU 至少比老式的 UHD Graphics 系列.也许最重要的是,这款平板电脑能够以 60 FPS 的速度播放 4K 视频,而且不会出现任何掉帧现象。

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
针对 4K60 视频播放进行了优化
针对 4K60 视频播放进行了优化
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U
100 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
84.1 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 4680U
66.7 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
65.4 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Adreno 690, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
41.6 pt
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690
 
41.3 pt
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Adreno 690, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
41.2 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G1
33.5 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
30.9 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro X
Qualcomm Adreno 685, Microsoft SQ1
24 pt
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-8100Y
21.3 pt
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i3-10100Y
19.6 pt
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
17.3 pt
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U
6251 Points +115%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
5926 Points +104%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 4680U
4895 Points +68%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
4162 Points +43%
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690
  (2898 - 2979, n=3)
2930 Points +1%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Adreno 690, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
2912 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Adreno 690, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
2898 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G1
2280 Points -22%
Microsoft Surface Pro X
Qualcomm Adreno 685, Microsoft SQ1
1927 Points -34%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1881 Points -35%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-8100Y
1378 Points -53%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i3-10100Y
1302 Points -55%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
1257 Points -57%
1280x720 Performance Physics
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U
16890 Points +125%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
10471 Points +40%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 4680U
10051 Points +34%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
9809 Points +31%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Adreno 690, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
7500 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Adreno 690, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
7333 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690
  (7084 - 7500, n=3)
7306 Points -3%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
6498 Points -13%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G1
5453 Points -27%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-8100Y
3665 Points -51%
Microsoft Surface Pro X
Qualcomm Adreno 685, Microsoft SQ1
3210 Points -57%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i3-10100Y
3210 Points -57%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
2319 Points -69%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U
6250 Points +205%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
5967 Points +192%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
4469 Points +118%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 4680U
3894 Points +90%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Adreno 690, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
2190 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690
  (2046 - 2190, n=3)
2105 Points +3%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Adreno 690, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
2046 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G1
1989 Points -3%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1509 Points -26%
Microsoft Surface Pro X
Qualcomm Adreno 685, Microsoft SQ1
1390 Points -32%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-8100Y
1260 Points -38%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i3-10100Y
1187 Points -42%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
1134 Points -45%
3DMark 11 Performance
3063 points
Help
Blender - v3.3 Classroom CPU
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Adreno 690, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
2098 Seconds *
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
1548 Seconds * +26%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U
730 Seconds * +65%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

TW220 更适合游戏串流,而不是原生游戏。也就是说,游戏性能介于大多数酷睿 i5 笔记本电脑上较慢的UHD Graphics 和较快的 Iris Xe 80 EU 之间。无论如何,许多游戏在某些设置下会无法启动或崩溃。

Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
104.2 (80.8min) fps +78%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
90.6 (80.6min) fps +54%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
80.4 (44.8min) fps +37%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
78.1 (66.3min) fps +33%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
77.1 (44.4min) fps +31%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
72.9 (63.9min) fps +24%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
58.7 (42.2min) fps
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690
  (57.1 - 58.7, n=3)
57.8 fps -2%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
Intel Core i3-10100Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
57.2 (47.7min) fps -3%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
57.1 (39.9min) fps -3%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
52 (44.7min) fps -11%
1366x768 med (1/3)
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
82.2 (62.6min) fps +49%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
75.2 (63min) fps +36%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
70.4 (53.4min) fps +28%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
60.5 (36min) fps +10%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
55.2 (42.8min) fps
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690
  (54.5 - 55.2, n=3)
54.7 fps -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
54.5 (41.6min) fps -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
46.3 (41.8min) fps -16%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
40.1 (28.6min) fps -27%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
25.9 (21.8min) fps -53%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
Intel Core i3-10100Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
25.9 (21.4min) fps -53%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
64.8 (53.8min) fps +41%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
47 (41.1min) fps +2%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
46.6 (42.5min) fps +2%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
45.9 (40.8min) fps
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690
  (38.8 - 47, n=3)
43.9 fps -4%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
41.1 (21.5min) fps -10%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
38.7 (27.5min) fps -16%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
23.5 (13min) fps -49%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
20.6 (19.1min) fps -55%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
Intel Core i3-10100Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
12.9 (11.3min) fps -72%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
12.1 (10.5min) fps -74%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
57 (48min) fps +42%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
42.5 (37.2min) fps +6%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
40.7 (35.3min) fps +1%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
40.2 (35.4min) fps
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
36.8 (25.5min) fps -8%
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690
  (29.4 - 40.7, n=3)
36.8 fps -8%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
36.1 (16.5min) fps -10%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
21.4 (10.6min) fps -47%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
18.3 (17.2min) fps -54%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
Intel Core i3-10100Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
11.6 (10.1min) fps -71%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
11.3 (10.2min) fps -72%
GTA V
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
104.3 (18.5min, 55.6P1) fps +249%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
29.9 (0.827min, 11.6P1) fps
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690
  ()
29.9 fps 0%
1920x1080 Lowest Settings possible
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
29.4 (4.27min, 15.6P1) fps
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690
  ()
29.4 fps 0%
The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
91 fps +136%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
81.9 (62min) fps +112%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
59.6 fps +54%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
43 fps +11%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
38.6 (23min) fps
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690
  (35 - 38.6, n=2)
36.8 fps -5%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
35 fps -9%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
9.5 fps -75%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
Intel Core i3-10100Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
9.3 fps -76%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
59 fps +87%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
55.8 (52min) fps +77%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
37.3 fps +18%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
35 fps +11%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
31.5 (27min) fps
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690
  ()
31.5 fps 0%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
33 fps +73%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
29 (25min) fps +52%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
19.1 (15min) fps
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690
  ()
19.1 fps 0%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
17.1 fps -10%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
13.5 (11min) fps +59%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
12.8 (12min, 12P1) fps +51%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
8.5 (5min) fps
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690
  ()
8.5 fps 0%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1280x720 Lite Quality
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
42.9 fps +126%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
30.7 fps +62%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
19 fps
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690
  ()
19 fps 0%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
15.1 fps -21%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
24.2 fps +97%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
14 fps +14%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
12.3 fps
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690
  ()
12.3 fps 0%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
7.49 fps -39%
1920x1080 High Quality
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
16.8 fps +130%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
8.19 fps +12%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
7.29 fps
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690
  ()
7.29 fps 0%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
5.21 fps -29%
X-Plane 11.11
1280x720 low (fps_test=1)
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
46.3 fps +117%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
37.9 fps +78%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
37.4 fps +76%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
30.3 fps +42%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
21.3 fps
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690
  (20.7 - 21.3, n=2)
21 fps -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
20.7 fps -3%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
19.5 fps -8%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
17.3 fps -19%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
10.2 fps -52%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
Intel Core i3-10100Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
8.06 fps -62%
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
36.6 fps +94%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
30.2 fps +60%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
29.9 fps +58%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
25.4 fps +34%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
22.7 fps +20%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
18.9 fps
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690
  (18 - 18.9, n=2)
18.5 fps -2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
18 fps -5%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
10.4 fps -45%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
8.22 fps -57%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
Intel Core i3-10100Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
6.26 fps -67%
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
31.6 fps +96%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
27.7 fps +72%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
26.6 fps +65%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
26.4 fps +64%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
19.1 fps +19%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
16.3 fps +1%
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690
  (16.1 - 16.3, n=2)
16.2 fps +1%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
16.1 fps
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
10.8 fps -33%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y
Intel Core m3-8100Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
7.69 fps -52%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
Intel Core i3-10100Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
6.09 fps -62%
F1 22
1280x720 Ultra Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
42.4 (30min, 24P1) fps
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690
  ()
42.4 fps 0%
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
47.4 (39min, 38P1) fps +82%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
26 (16min, 16P1) fps
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690
  ()
26 fps 0%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
43.5 (36min, 36P1) fps +93%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
22.5 (17min, 15P1) fps
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690
  ()
22.5 fps 0%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
30.7 (24min, 25P1) fps +81%
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
17 (13min, 12P1) fps
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690
  ()
17 fps 0%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
12.6 (10min, 9P1) fps
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690
  ()
12.6 fps 0%

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

051015202530354045Tooltip
lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 29.9
The Witcher 3 (2015) 38.6 31.5 19.1 8.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 58.7 55.2 45.9 40.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 19 12.3 7.29
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 21.3 18.9 16.1
F1 22 (2022) 26 22.5 17 12.6

排放量

温度

在运行高负载时,交流适配器仍保持相对低温,温度低于 28 摄氏度
在运行高负载时,交流适配器仍保持相对低温,温度低于 28 摄氏度

表面温度可能会很高,但不会像 Surface Pro 9.正面和背面的温度分别高达 36 摄氏度和 40 摄氏度,而微软平板电脑两侧的温度分别为 45 摄氏度。

系统空闲(前)
系统空闲(前)
系统空闲(背面)
系统空闲(背面)
高压力(前部)
高压力(前部)
高压力(背部)
高压力(背部)
Max. Load
 37.6 °C39.4 °C38.6 °C 
 35.4 °C38.4 °C36.4 °C 
 34.6 °C34.8 °C35.2 °C 
Maximum: 39.4 °C
Average: 36.7 °C
40.4 °C40.8 °C39.4 °C
37.4 °C39.6 °C38.2 °C
35.4 °C35.4 °C36 °C
Maximum: 40.8 °C
Average: 38.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  28 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
Intel Core i3-10100Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
Apple iPad 10
Apple A14 Bionic, Apple A14 Bionic GPU
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022
Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
Heat
-3%
5%
-2%
-7%
14%
Maximum Upper Side *
39.4
44.6
-13%
40.8
-4%
46.1
-17%
35.1
11%
34.3
13%
Maximum Bottom *
40.8
45.9
-13%
43.4
-6%
42.7
-5%
36.9
10%
34.5
15%
Idle Upper Side *
26.8
24.8
7%
23.2
13%
25
7%
33.4
-25%
22.8
15%
Idle Bottom *
26.8
25.3
6%
22.6
16%
25
7%
33.1
-24%
23.1
14%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

最大音量时会产生粉红噪声。低音效果差,这也是平板电脑应有的效果
最大音量时会产生粉红噪声。低音效果差,这也是平板电脑应有的效果
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.837.738.82529.829.429.83128.924.128.94027.428.427.45026.224.826.26325.823.825.88026.525.326.51002021.12012522.317.522.316024.313.924.320027.11227.125033.111.533.131539.512.239.540048.711.948.750052.611.852.663063.411.163.480068.99.768.9100067.99.667.9125064.19.664.1160064.310.164.320006410.364250065.411.165.4315068.211.368.2400072.21172.2500067.411.567.463005811.458800052.311.552.31000045.811.545.81250039.311.539.31600042.510.642.5SPL78.323.178.3N37.60.437.6median 52.6median 11.5median 52.6Delta13.40.913.426.325.821.422.12624.925.127.622.532.523.448.72655.818.860.922.167.2267019.372.317.674.217.774.319.575.31571.711.871.311.27410.574.21072.710.17210.67210.97511.374.811.671.71269.71269.612.371.112.669.61270.111.269.824.784.70.666.6median 12median 71.73.42.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseRobo and Kala TW220 2-in-1Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 10.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (35.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理

耗电量

OLED 触摸屏明显更耗电,因为根据颜色和亮度设置的不同,它本身的功耗就高达 9 瓦。与 Surface 机型相比,它可能提供更深的色彩和更亮的背光,但用户需要为此付出更高的功耗。

Witcher 3 1080p 超功耗
Witcher 3 1080p 超功耗
全黑屏幕的功耗仅为 3 瓦,而最大亮度下的全白屏幕功耗高达 14 瓦。
全黑屏幕的功耗仅为 3 瓦,而最大亮度下的全白屏幕功耗高达 14 瓦。
启动 Prime95 应力时,耗电量会在约 20 秒内飙升至 37 W,然后下降并稳定在 24 W。
启动 Prime95 应力时,耗电量会在约 20 秒内飙升至 37 W,然后下降并稳定在 24 W。
Prime95 + FurMark 应力在 10 秒处启动
Prime95 + FurMark 应力在 10 秒处启动
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.55 / 0.7 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.2 / 6.7 / 15.3 Watt
Load midlight 22.7 / 46.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G, AMOLED, 2560x1600, 12.6"
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV, IPS, 2880x1920, 13"
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690, , IPS, 2880x1920, 13"
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
i3-10100Y, UHD Graphics 615, SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR, IPS , 1920x1280, 10.5"
Apple iPad 10
A14, A14 Bionic GPU, 64 GB SSD, IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9"
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022
M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 128 GB NVMe, IPS, 2388x1668, 11"
Power Consumption
-59%
13%
30%
46%
55%
Idle Minimum *
3.2
5.1
-59%
2.8
12%
2.6
19%
1.34
58%
1.1
66%
Idle Average *
6.7
9.8
-46%
6.8
-1%
5.1
24%
7.78
-16%
6
10%
Idle Maximum *
15.3
11.3
26%
8.1
47%
5.9
61%
7.89
48%
6.1
60%
Load Average *
22.7
47.5
-109%
23.8
-5%
22.9
-1%
9.05
60%
9.1
60%
Witcher 3 ultra *
16.4
36
-120%
Load Maximum *
46.7
68.5
-47%
40.2
14%
24.6
47%
9.98
79%
10.2
78%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest

05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø16.4 (15.4-20)
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø36 (34.5-47.5)
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø32.4 (16.8-46.6)
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø59.5 (45.5-68.5)
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.5 (3.1-5.38)

Power Consumption external Monitor

05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø26.9 (22.6-37.1)
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø32.7 (15.6-35.8)
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø67.9 (67.2-68.5)
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø22.3 (17.7-26)
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø41.2 (39.8-49.5)
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø15.8 (14.9-18.3)
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø31.7 (30-42.1)
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø3.24 (2.89-4.61)

电池寿命

电池容量比 Surface Pro 系列小,只有 41 Wh,但实际网页浏览时间一样长达 8.5 小时。

使用随附的(约 5.3 x 5.3 x 3 厘米)65 瓦 USB-C 交流适配器,从空电到满电大约需要 70 分钟。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
23h 26min
WiFi Websurfing
8h 35min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 04min
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690, 41 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 47.7 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690, 47.7 Wh
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
i3-10100Y, UHD Graphics 615, 28 Wh
Apple iPad 10
A14, A14 Bionic GPU, 28.93 Wh
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022
M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 28.65 Wh
Battery Runtime
-23%
17%
-18%
34%
75%
Reader / Idle
1406
1729
23%
2198
56%
WiFi v1.3
515
451
-12%
603
17%
420
-18%
647
26%
846
64%
Load
124
82
-34%
191
54%
256
106%
H.264
562
740
941

Pros

+ 出色的 Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 性能
+ 具有 P3 色彩的明亮 OLED 面板
+ 价格相对便宜
+ 良好的电池寿命

Cons

- 不可避免的 Windows ARM 兼容性问题
- 所有亮度下 OLED 都会闪烁
- 显示器未经校准
- 不支持 Thunderbolt

评语:Surface Pro 和 Surface Go 之间的绝佳中间点

回顾:Robo & Kala TW220。测试设备由 Robo & Kala 提供
回顾:Robo & Kala TW220。测试设备由 Robo & Kala 提供

Robo and Kala TW220 的最大亮点在于其 OLED 触摸屏、不错的 ARM 性能以及相对实惠的售价(铝制机身和键盘底座做工精良)。OLED 显示屏尤其有助于将 TW220 与竞争对手 Surface Pro 和 Surface Go 系列区分开来,是该机型的一大亮点。如果用户能够欣赏或利用 OLED 显示屏更宽广的色彩和更深邃的黑阶,就会发现 TW220 比其他大多数 Windows 平板电脑更有价值。

如果你能接受 Windows ARM 的限制,那么 Robo and Kala TW220 将是 Surface Go 3 甚至 Surface Pro 9 的经济实惠的替代品,如果你不需要英特尔酷睿 i7 的强大性能的话。

对于未来的型号,我们希望看到显示屏经过预校准,这样用户开箱即可享受到准确的 OLED 色彩。键盘连接插针可以更牢固一些,如果能提供更多的连接选项,包括 MicroSD 或 LTE/5G 选项,我们将不胜感激。ARM 处理器不可避免地存在某些兼容性问题,因此,采用英特尔酷睿处理器的替代机型可能会吸引更多感兴趣的买家。不过,对于浏览、收发电子邮件和流媒体等基本任务来说,TW220 是我们所见过的同价位最高效的 Windows 平板电脑之一,尤其是与较小的 Surface Go 系列相比.

价格和供应情况

Robo & Kala TW220 现已通过其官方网站发货。售价 599 美元,或使用优惠券代码后在亚马逊上以相同价格出售。

Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 - 07/20/2023 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo

Chassis
81 / 98 → 83%
Keyboard
81 / 80 → 100%
Pointing Device
78%
Connectivity
56 / 70 → 81%
Weight
80 / 40-88 → 83%
Battery
83%
Display
84%
Games Performance
59 / 78 → 76%
Application Performance
79 / 92 → 86%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
57 / 91 → 63%
Camera
57 / 85 → 66%
Average
76%
82%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Robo and Kala TW220 二合一 OLED 平板电脑评测:超越微软 Surface Go 3
Allen Ngo, 2023-07-20 (Update: 2023-07-20)