Robo and Kala TW220 二合一 OLED 平板电脑评测:超越微软 Surface Go 3
TW220 是美籍华人公司 Robo and Kala 最新推出的 Windows 11 旗舰平板电脑。它是极少数采用 ARM SoC 的 Windows 平板电脑之一,更不用说采用 高通骁龙 8cx Gen 3集成 Adreno 690 图形处理器。因此,它直接与微软 Surface 系列产品竞争,包括最近推出的 Surface Pro 9 ARM采用了完全相同的高通处理器。
除了不常见的 SoC 之外,它的规格也像一款高端平板电脑,包括 16:10 2560 x 1600 OLED 触摸屏(98% DCI-P3 色彩)、16 GB LPDDR4X 内存、512 GB NVMe 固态硬盘和可拆卸键盘底座,售价 599 美元,比一般采用酷睿处理器的 Surface Pro 便宜数百美元。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82.1 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690 | 712 g | 7.3 mm | 12.60" | 2560x1600 | |
88.4 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 877 g | 9.3 mm | 13.00" | 2880x1920 | |
86.9 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690 | 883 g | 9.3 mm | 13.00" | 2880x1920 | |
85.3 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 i3-10100Y, UHD Graphics 615 | 783 g | 8.3 mm | 10.50" | 1920x1280 | |
88.6 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Apple iPad 10 A14, A14 Bionic GPU | 477 g | 7 mm | 10.90" | 2360x1640 | |
92.5 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 M2, M2 10-Core GPU | 466 g | 5.9 mm | 11.00" | 2388x1668 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - 强烈的第一印象
铝制机身坚固耐用,给人留下了深刻的第一印象,因为它比 Surface Pro 更薄、更轻,边框也更窄。键盘底座也很坚固,但其连接插针太容易从平板电脑上脱落。
平板电脑本身重 712 克,键盘底座重 350 克,总重 1.06 千克。它比大多数甚至所有 Surface 型号都要轻,包括较小的Surface Go 3.
连接性
两个 USB-C 端口分别支持 DisplayPort 和充电。我们能够以 8 位色深输出最高 4K 和 60 Hz 的图像。没有耳机插孔。
交流
高通 WCN685x 是 Wi-Fi 6 和 Wi-Fi 6E 连接的标准配置。在与华硕 AXE11000 6 GHz 网络配对时,我们没有遇到任何问题。
网络摄像头
TW220 的网络摄像头分辨率为 1300 万像素,比以下两款产品的网络摄像头分辨率都要高 Surface Pro 9(10 MP)和 Surface Go 3(800 万像素)都要高。内置的红外摄像头支持 Windows Hello,但没有隐私快门。
配件和保修
零售包装盒包括背光可移动键盘底座和 4096 级压力智能笔。键盘底座有自己的内置电池,可以通过蓝牙无线连接到平板电脑,也可以通过连接插针物理连接到平板电脑。键盘底座没有集成任何端口,因此只能在与平板电脑物理连接时才能充电。
制造商提供标准的一年有限保修服务。
输入设备
键盘
平板电脑的可拆卸键盘几乎总是不如传统笔记本电脑的键盘。不过,TW220 的键盘其实还不错。按键反馈均匀、清晰,1.3 毫米的键程是标准配置。遗憾的是,按键感觉有些僵硬,手指需要花更大的力气才能按下并记录输入。
触摸板
点击板的尺寸为 11 x 6.5 厘米,比 Surface Pro 键盘上 10.2 x 5.8 厘米的点击板要大。点击时的反馈较浅,但比大多数笔记本电脑更有力。不过,咔哒声随后会变得尖锐而响亮。
显示屏 - OLED
TW220 是我们数据库中第一款采用夏普 RM69380 OLED 面板的设备,与之形成鲜明对比的是 LG 飞利浦 LP129WT2 或京东方 NV105WAM IPS 面板。Surface Pro 9或 Surface Go 3 分别采用的是 LG Philips LP129WT2 或 BOE NV105WAM IPS 面板。与 IPS 相比,OLED 具有固有的优势,包括更快的黑白响应时间以减少重影、更深的黑阶、更宽的色彩范围和更好的亮度均匀性。
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 568.7 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.07 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 7.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.19
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 Sharp RM69380, AMOLED, 2560x1600, 12.6" | Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U LP129WT2-SPA6, IPS, 2880x1920, 13" | Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 NV105WAM-N31, IPS , 1920x1280, 10.5" | Apple iPad 10 Liquid Retina, IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9" | Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 IPS, 2388x1668, 11" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | |||||
Display P3 Coverage | 65.6 | 69 | |||
sRGB Coverage | 97.7 | 99.1 | |||
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.7 | 69.8 | |||
Response Times | 15980% | -327% | -1336% | -1360% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2.4 ? | 13 ? -442% | 37.2 ? -1450% | 42.68 ? -1678% | 43 ? -1692% |
Response Time Black / White * | 2.04 ? | 19.4 ? -851% | 22.8 ? -1018% | 22.31 ? -994% | 23 ? -1027% |
PWM Frequency | 60.6 ? | 29896 ? 49233% | 962 ? 1487% | ||
Screen | 30% | 30% | 30% | 38% | |
Brightness middle | 568.7 | 455 -20% | 418 -26% | 467 -18% | 620 9% |
Brightness | 573 | 453 -21% | 415 -28% | 468 -18% | 611 7% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 94 2% | 90 -2% | 92 0% | 93 1% |
Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.28 | 0.49 | 0.37 | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.07 | 1.7 72% | 1.2 80% | 1.4 77% | 1.49 75% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.12 | 3.8 66% | 2.6 77% | 3.3 70% | 3.67 67% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.4 | 1.5 80% | 1.8 76% | 2.3 69% | 2.3 69% |
Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.17 101% | 2.21 100% | 2.21 100% | 2.211 100% |
CCT | 7211 90% | 6761 96% | 6225 104% | 6852 95% | 6849 95% |
Contrast | 1197 | 1493 | 953 | 1676 | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.5 | 1 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 8005% /
5347% | -149% /
-89% | -653% /
-312% | -661% /
-311% |
* ... smaller is better
尽管显示屏是高质量的 OLED 面板,但并没有经过预校准。它的目标色温是 P3,但过冷的色温意味着在饱和度较低时色彩不准确,正如我们下面的 CalMAN 测量结果所示。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
2.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.84 ms rise | |
↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.2 ms rise | |
↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60.6 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 60.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 60.6 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
在所有亮度级别(包括 100% 设置)下都会出现闪烁。我们能检测到 60 Hz 的闪烁,这与大多数其他配备 OLED 显示屏的平板电脑、笔记本电脑或智能手机的情况类似。
实际上,Robo 和 Kala 的显示屏比 Surface Pro 9 或 Surface Go 3 的显示屏亮度要高出 25% 到 35%。不过,还是建议在阴凉处工作,以减少眩光,最大限度地提高色彩鲜艳度。
性能 - 多线程情况下比酷睿 i3 更快
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 设置为性能模式。值得注意的是,许多应用程序都无法在 Windows ARM 上启动,包括我们常用的许多基准测试应用程序。LatencyMon、PCMark 10、3DMark、i1Profiler、BaseMark、Geekbench 5.4、GPUScore Sacred Path、3DMark 06、HWiNFO 传感器读数和某些 Windows 批次文件只是我们在测试过程中遇到问题的部分应用程序。
处理器
原始多线程性能始终领先于三年前的酷睿 i5-1035G1而单线程工作负载则恰恰相反。4K 编码或 Blender 等高要求任务的运行速度比酷睿 i5 慢,这意味着高级用户仍应考虑使用酷睿 i7 微软 Surface Pro。至少 骁龙 8cx Gen 3要比速度慢得令人发指的 Surface Go 2.
在 Prime95 下运行时,CPU 时钟频率在最初几秒内会高达 2.7 GHz,几分钟后才会下降并稳定在 2.1 GHz。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop (copy 1)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (3534 - 3709, n=3) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (559 - 608, n=3) | |
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (343 - 2627, n=3) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (1161 - 1257, n=3) | |
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (7085 - 7704, n=3) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (204 - 1379, n=3) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (7622 - 14660, n=3) |
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
系统性能
主观而言,Windows 11 在骁龙 SoC 上运行流畅,反应灵敏,测试过程中没有出现 BSOD。尽管如此,请记住大多数应用程序都是通过模拟运行的,因此出现不兼容的几率很高。
操作系统导航不如大多数Android 平板电脑流畅,部分原因是显示屏的刷新率为 60 Hz。如今,大多数平板电脑已经采用了刷新率更高的显示屏,如联想 P11 的 120 Hz 显示屏。 联想 P11.
CrossMark / Overall | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690 (627 - 718, n=2) | |
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690 (586 - 685, n=2) | |
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690 (740 - 776, n=2) | |
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690 (468 - 652, n=2) | |
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (40599 - 42710, n=3) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (33013 - 33757, n=3) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (49100 - 49815, n=3) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
系统随附 东芝 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G这是一款经济型 PCIe4 x4 NVMe 固态硬盘。即使在长时间的压力下,该硬盘也能维持略高于 2000 MB/s 的读取速率。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
用户不应指望集成的 Adreno 690的性能超过普通 Iris Xe或 Radeon RX Vega 系列因为它的功耗更低,而且采用被动冷却方式。即便如此,3DMark 11 显示高通公司的 GPU 至少比老式的 UHD Graphics 系列.也许最重要的是,这款平板电脑能够以 60 FPS 的速度播放 4K 视频,而且不会出现任何掉帧现象。
3DMark 11 Performance | 3063 points | |
Help |
Blender - v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
TW220 更适合游戏串流,而不是原生游戏。也就是说,游戏性能介于大多数酷睿 i5 笔记本电脑上较慢的UHD Graphics 和较快的 Iris Xe 80 EU 之间。无论如何,许多游戏在某些设置下会无法启动或崩溃。
GTA V | |
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 | |
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690 () | |
1920x1080 Lowest Settings possible | |
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 | |
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690 () |
The Witcher 3 | |
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 | |
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690 (35 - 38.6, n=2) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y | |
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 | |
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 | |
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 | |
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690 () | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 | |
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690 () | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 Ryzen 5 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 | |
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690 () |
F1 22 | |
1280x720 Ultra Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 | |
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690 () | |
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 | |
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690 () | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 | |
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690 () | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 | |
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690 () | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 | |
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690 () |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 29.9 | |||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 38.6 | 31.5 | 19.1 | 8.5 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 58.7 | 55.2 | 45.9 | 40.2 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 19 | 12.3 | 7.29 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 21.3 | 18.9 | 16.1 | |
F1 22 (2022) | 26 | 22.5 | 17 | 12.6 |
排放量
温度
表面温度可能会很高,但不会像 Surface Pro 9.正面和背面的温度分别高达 36 摄氏度和 40 摄氏度,而微软平板电脑两侧的温度分别为 45 摄氏度。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690 | Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690 | Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 Intel Core i3-10100Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615 | Apple iPad 10 Apple A14 Bionic, Apple A14 Bionic GPU | Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -3% | 5% | -2% | -7% | 14% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 39.4 | 44.6 -13% | 40.8 -4% | 46.1 -17% | 35.1 11% | 34.3 13% |
Maximum Bottom * | 40.8 | 45.9 -13% | 43.4 -6% | 42.7 -5% | 36.9 10% | 34.5 15% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.8 | 24.8 7% | 23.2 13% | 25 7% | 33.4 -25% | 22.8 15% |
Idle Bottom * | 26.8 | 25.3 6% | 22.6 16% | 25 7% | 33.1 -24% | 23.1 14% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 10.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (35.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
OLED 触摸屏明显更耗电,因为根据颜色和亮度设置的不同,它本身的功耗就高达 9 瓦。与 Surface 机型相比,它可能提供更深的色彩和更亮的背光,但用户需要为此付出更高的功耗。
Off / Standby | 0.55 / 0.7 Watt |
Idle | 3.2 / 6.7 / 15.3 Watt |
Load |
22.7 / 46.7 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G, AMOLED, 2560x1600, 12.6" | Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV, IPS, 2880x1920, 13" | Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690, , IPS, 2880x1920, 13" | Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 i3-10100Y, UHD Graphics 615, SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR, IPS , 1920x1280, 10.5" | Apple iPad 10 A14, A14 Bionic GPU, 64 GB SSD, IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9" | Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 128 GB NVMe, IPS, 2388x1668, 11" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -59% | 13% | 30% | 46% | 55% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.2 | 5.1 -59% | 2.8 12% | 2.6 19% | 1.34 58% | 1.1 66% |
Idle Average * | 6.7 | 9.8 -46% | 6.8 -1% | 5.1 24% | 7.78 -16% | 6 10% |
Idle Maximum * | 15.3 | 11.3 26% | 8.1 47% | 5.9 61% | 7.89 48% | 6.1 60% |
Load Average * | 22.7 | 47.5 -109% | 23.8 -5% | 22.9 -1% | 9.05 60% | 9.1 60% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 16.4 | 36 -120% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 46.7 | 68.5 -47% | 40.2 14% | 24.6 47% | 9.98 79% | 10.2 78% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
电池容量比 Surface Pro 系列小,只有 41 Wh,但实际网页浏览时间一样长达 8.5 小时。
使用随附的(约 5.3 x 5.3 x 3 厘米)65 瓦 USB-C 交流适配器,从空电到满电大约需要 70 分钟。
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1 SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690, 41 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 47.7 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690, 47.7 Wh | Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 i3-10100Y, UHD Graphics 615, 28 Wh | Apple iPad 10 A14, A14 Bionic GPU, 28.93 Wh | Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 28.65 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -23% | 17% | -18% | 34% | 75% | |
Reader / Idle | 1406 | 1729 23% | 2198 56% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 515 | 451 -12% | 603 17% | 420 -18% | 647 26% | 846 64% |
Load | 124 | 82 -34% | 191 54% | 256 106% | ||
H.264 | 562 | 740 | 941 |
Pros
Cons
评语:Surface Pro 和 Surface Go 之间的绝佳中间点
Robo and Kala TW220 的最大亮点在于其 OLED 触摸屏、不错的 ARM 性能以及相对实惠的售价(铝制机身和键盘底座做工精良)。OLED 显示屏尤其有助于将 TW220 与竞争对手 Surface Pro 和 Surface Go 系列区分开来,是该机型的一大亮点。如果用户能够欣赏或利用 OLED 显示屏更宽广的色彩和更深邃的黑阶,就会发现 TW220 比其他大多数 Windows 平板电脑更有价值。
如果你能接受 Windows ARM 的限制,那么 Robo and Kala TW220 将是 Surface Go 3 甚至 Surface Pro 9 的经济实惠的替代品,如果你不需要英特尔酷睿 i7 的强大性能的话。
对于未来的型号,我们希望看到显示屏经过预校准,这样用户开箱即可享受到准确的 OLED 色彩。键盘连接插针可以更牢固一些,如果能提供更多的连接选项,包括 MicroSD 或 LTE/5G 选项,我们将不胜感激。ARM 处理器不可避免地存在某些兼容性问题,因此,采用英特尔酷睿处理器的替代机型可能会吸引更多感兴趣的买家。不过,对于浏览、收发电子邮件和流媒体等基本任务来说,TW220 是我们所见过的同价位最高效的 Windows 平板电脑之一,尤其是与较小的 Surface Go 系列相比.
Robo and Kala TW220 2-in-1
- 07/20/2023 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.