微软Surface Pro 9 ARM评测--高端ARM敞篷车令人失望
微软已经停用了旧的 废弃了旧的Surface Pro X产品线，现在提供两个版本的新Surface Pro 9来代替。我们已经 测试了英特尔的型号现在我们看看采用高通公司ARM处理器的机型。乍一看，最明显的区别是ARM版本的集成5G调制解调器和没有风扇，这确保Surface Pro 9 ARM总是安静地运行。
就价格而言，配备8GB内存和128GB小型固态硬盘的ARM型号起价为1549欧元（约合人民币1648元），这使得它比配备8GB内存和256GB固态硬盘的Core-i5版本贵了1299欧元（约合人民币1382元；仅限可兑换，输入设备需额外付费）。虽然ARM版本当然提供5G，但如果有256GB的存储空间，它就比可比的i5型号贵350欧元（约372美元）。通过更昂贵的价格，微软暗示该产品至少是一样好的，但情况真的是这样吗？
我们的测试装置是带有256个固态硬盘存储的版本，价格为1659欧元（约合人民币1765元），另外280欧元（约合人民币298元）用于购买键盘和输入笔，结果是整套产品的总价格为1940欧元（约合人民币2063元）。由于许多地方与最近测试的英特尔型号相同，在这篇评论中，我们只讨论差异，主要关注ARM SoC的性能和兼容性。你可以在我们的评测中找到关于外壳、输入设备、显示器和扬声器的详细信息。 配备Core-i7处理器的Surface Pro 9.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86.9 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690 | 883 g | 9.3 mm | 13.00" | 2880x1920 | |
| 88.4 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 877 g | 9.3 mm | 13.00" | 2880x1920 | |
| 84.4 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2019 | Microsoft Surface Pro X SQ1, Adreno 685 | 1 kg | 7.3 mm | 13.00" | 2880x1920 | |
| 86.7 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2022 | Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690 | 1.1 kg | 13.4 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1200 | |
| 84 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA SD 8cx Gen 2 5G, Adreno 680 | 1.3 kg | 16 mm | 13.50" | 1920x1280 | |
| 91.8 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2, M2 10-Core GPU | 682 g | 6.4 mm | 12.90" | 2732x2048 |
与英特尔版本的Surface Pro 9的区别
基本上，这两个版本的Surface Pro 9在外观上看起来几乎是一样的。由于它是被动冷却的，ARM型号只缺少风扇通风口。它也只有深灰色或银色可供选择。 外壳的尺寸是相同的，因此可以使用相同的键盘。ARM型号只重了6克（约0.2盎司）。此外，充电器的功率较弱，为39瓦，但也稍轻（210克对260克，~7.4对9.2盎司）。背面的维护挡板，在英特尔型号中非常容易打开，而在ARM型号中又需要一个SIM卡工具。
内置的5G模块是两款机型之间的另一个重要区别，因为与前几代相比，微软不再为英特尔机型提供WWAN模块了。采用高通SoC的Surface Pro 9可以支持NanoSIM或eSIM。为了测试这一点，我们使用了Telekom公司的NanoSIM，能够毫无问题地连接到5G网络。
与英特尔版本的AX211模块一样，WLAN模块（高通WCN685x）支持当前的Wi-Fi 6E标准，我们能够毫无问题地连接到华硕参考路由器的6GHz网络。传输速率很稳定，但发送性能总体上稍弱。然而，在日常操作中，你应该不会在这里遇到任何限制。
最后，高通SoC还为内置摄像头提供了一些工作室效果。例如，你可以改变背景，或者相机可以让人集中在图像的中心，效果可以接受。
ARM型号还为微软自己的配件提供了Surface Connect端口，但这里缺少对Thunderbolt 4的支持。两个USB-C端口只支持USB-3.2标准，包括充电功能和图像输出。
| Networking | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro X | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
性能--微软SQ3别名骁龙8cx第三代
在新的Surface Pro 9 ARM中，微软使用了SQ3 SoC，它的另一个名字是 高通Snapdragon 8cx第三代的另一个名称，该芯片也用于 联想ThinkPad X13s，比如说。Adreno 690 GPU作为显卡，该SoC可以由8或16GB的内存支持。对于固态硬盘，你可以选择从128GB到512GB，但也有可能在以后更换紧凑的M.2-2230固态硬盘。
测试条件
没有具体的电源模式，我们也无法可靠地测量该处理器的时钟速度和TDP。根据高通公司的说法，其消耗量为7瓦。然而，从该设备的功耗来看，在负载下应该增加到近30瓦。
与我们之前测试的 Surface Pro X和 SQ1 SoC，微软现在支持64位应用程序的模拟，使我们也能运行明显更多的基准测试。但和以前一样，它仍然不支持所有的应用程序。
处理器 - 高通8cx第三代
高通公司高通公司8cx第三代芯片是一个具有四个性能（最高3GHz）和四个效率核心（最高2.4GHz）的ARM处理器，大致对应于Apple M2和目前英特尔移动处理器的设计理念。
8cx第三代的多核性能基本上一点也不差，对应于旧的 Surface Pro 7配有酷睿i7-1065G7.然而，问题是单核性能较弱，这在日常操作中也很容易被发现。Surface Pro 9在与现代英特尔CPU或甚至Apple 自己的ARM处理器（如M2）的竞争中根本没有机会。 Apple M2这里。
在电池运行中，CPU的性能并没有降低。你可以在我们的技术部分找到更多的CPU基准测试 我们的技术部分.
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average of class Convertible (616 - 18698, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (3534 - 3709, n=3) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Average of class Convertible (308 - 1980, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (559 - 608, n=3) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Convertible (242 - 7303, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (810 - 1258, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Average of class Convertible (149.8 - 781, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (199 - 222, n=3) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2889, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (723 - 774, n=2) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 302, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (119 - 119.1, n=2) | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (1059 - 1600, n=3) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Average of class Convertible (175 - 1059, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Convertible (12977 - 72400, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (16223 - 24505, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (3672 - 6493, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (3874 - 3946, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Average of class Convertible (663 - 14016, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (4457 - 7522, n=2) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro X | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| Average of class Convertible (319 - 2062, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (1486 - 1690, n=2) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro X | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Convertible (0.73 - 22.4, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (1.5 - 2.68, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (115.5 - 121.5, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Average of class Convertible (42 - 121.5, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (1.011 - 1.013, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Average of class Convertible (0.4102 - 1.013, n=59, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Average of class Convertible | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Convertible (468 - 29594, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (343 - 2627, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average of class Convertible (2644 - 114033, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (13729 - 14650, n=3) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Convertible (182 - 4841, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (453 - 1144, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average of class Convertible (10502 - 120368, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (15447 - 27474, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average of class Convertible (659 - 16315, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (1161 - 1257, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average of class Convertible (1420 - 61249, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (7085 - 7704, n=3) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average of class Convertible (1279 - 169089, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (638 - 1279, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Convertible (61.4 - 1243, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (398 - 412, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Convertible (254 - 16065, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (204 - 1379, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 | |
| Average of class Convertible (5136 - 53406, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (7622 - 14660, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
此外，我们还想简单了解一下高通处理器的效率。虽然8cx第三代在单核效率方面能够勉强领先于英特尔和AMD的竞争对手，但这并没有什么帮助，因为单核性能总体上非常低，这对设备的主观性能有影响。
在多核测试中，效率确实很差。我们可以证实这一点，因为尽管性能平平，但该设备在满负荷的情况下从插座中拉出40瓦，因此大约有30瓦被用于处理器。我们不能把这称为真正的高效。
| Power Consumption | |
| Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
系统性能
我们在合成测试方面受到限制，因为即使是跨平台的CrossMark也会反复崩溃。取而代之的是，我们展示了浏览器的基准测试，但这里的性能总体上也非常弱，也反映了主观的性能印象。虽然操作基本流畅，即使是打开设置等简单的任务，也会有一些明显的卡顿，而且设备很快就会被复杂的应用耗费掉。那些熟悉 配备M1/M2 SoC的MacBook Air的人例如，期望在这里有类似的性能，肯定会感到失望。
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro X | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| Speedometer 2.0 / Result | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro X | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Average of class Convertible (16353 - 108544, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (40599 - 42710, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Average of class Convertible (12706 - 125359, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (33013 - 33757, n=3) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average of class Convertible (10177 - 117920, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (49100 - 49815, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average of class Convertible (7.4 - 173, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (10.2 - 18.8, n=3) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
这款紧凑的M.2-2230固态硬盘来自SK海力士，提供256GB的存储容量，其中180GB在首次运行设备后仍可使用。在日常运行中，PCIe 3.0 SSd的传输率还可以，而且足够，特别是考虑到CPU的低性能。此外，即使在较长时间的负载后，传输率也保持不变。你可以找到更多的SSD基准测试 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
图形计算由集成的 阿德雷诺-690 GPU处理器，它能够在日常操作中毫无问题地再现高分辨率的视频。从纯粹的性能来看，我们看到与旧的Adreno 680相比，有大约25%的优势。 Adreno 680，但尘封已久的老式Iris Xe Graphics G7的英特尔CPU仍然明显更强大。的 M2 GPU目前iPad Pro 12.9的M2 GPU在一个完全不同的联盟中发挥着作用。
Surface Pro 9 ARM几乎不适合游戏，因为许多常规游戏几乎无法运行或根本无法启动。相反，你应该把自己限制在Windows商店的非常简单的游戏上（如纸牌游戏、象棋或麻将）。但至少Adreno 690的图形性能在电池运行以及较长时间的负载下保持稳定。你可以找到更多的GPU基准测试 这里.
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 3077 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8602 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2911 points | |
Help | ||
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 35 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 57.1 | 54.5 | 47 | 40.7 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 20.7 | 18 | 16.3 |
排放和电源管理
噪声水平
与对比组中的其他ARM设备一样，被动冷却当然是一个优势，因为可转换装置的运行始终保持完全安静。我们也没有发现任何其他电子噪音。
温度
在日常操作中，这台敞篷车实际上一点也不发热。只有当你真正提高对处理器的要求时，热量才会变得明显，由于金属外壳有时甚至在手握敞篷车时感到不舒服的温度。例如，我们测量到背部的表面温度高达44℃（111°F）。我们不得不问，为什么ARM处理器在这里以如此高的功率运行。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.4 °C / 97.5 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-8.4 °C / -15.1 F).
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690 | Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Microsoft Surface Pro X Microsoft SQ1, Qualcomm Adreno 685 | Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690 | HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 680 | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -9% | -9% | -32% | 3% | -11% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 40.8 | 44.6 -9% | 41.8 -2% | 59 -45% | 34.3 16% | 36.9 10% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 43.4 | 45.9 -6% | 45.7 -5% | 64.4 -48% | 35.4 18% | 37.6 13% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 23.2 | 24.8 -7% | 26.3 -13% | 26.5 -14% | 25.7 -11% | 31.9 -38% |
| Idle Bottom * | 22.6 | 25.3 -12% | 25.8 -14% | 26.8 -19% | 25.1 -11% | 29.4 -30% |
* ... smaller is better
消耗功率
对于一个ARM设备来说，空闲测量值总体上略高，但这可能是由于一个错误造成的。即使我们能够将显示器的120赫兹模式切换到60赫兹，也没有任何影响（显示器也没有像通常切换时那样短暂变黑）。在负载情况下，该设备从插座上拉出的最大功率为40瓦，因此它充分利用了附带的39瓦充电器。我们更希望它能包括英特尔版本的60瓦充电器，它还提供一个额外的USB-A连接用于充电。
| Off / Standby |   0.31 / 0.41 Watt |
| Idle |  2.8 / 6.8 / 8.1 Watt |
| Load |
23.8 / 40.2 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Adreno 690, SD 8cx Gen 3 | Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV | Microsoft Surface Pro X Adreno 685, SQ1, 256 GB NVMe | Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Adreno 690, SD 8cx Gen 3, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ | HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA Adreno 680, SD 8cx Gen 2 5G, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -67% | -0% | 11% | 36% | 1% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.8 | 5.1 -82% | 3.2 -14% | 2.6 7% | 2.3 18% | 2.54 9% |
| Idle Average * | 6.8 | 9.8 -44% | 8.5 -25% | 4.9 28% | 3.7 46% | 11.24 -65% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.1 | 11.3 -40% | 9.6 -19% | 5.2 36% | 5.6 31% | 11.48 -42% |
| Load Average * | 23.8 | 47.5 -100% | 19.8 17% | 21.5 10% | 13 45% | 12.97 46% |
| Load Maximum * | 40.2 | 68.5 -70% | 24.7 39% | 49.8 -24% | 25 38% | 16.6 59% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 36 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test
Power Consumption with External Monitor
电池寿命
电池寿命也受到120赫兹错误的影响，总体上变得有点短。尽管 英特尔型号的Surface Pro 9被超越了，但其背后的缺点是 ThinkPad X13s的劣势仍然显著。我们在150cd/m²亮度下的WLAN测试中测得10小时，而在全屏亮度下只有约6小时。在负载下，它可以持续140分钟。在60-Hz模式下，应该可以有更长的电池寿命。
Pros
Cons
评语--Surface Pro 9的ARM型号没有得到推荐
与英特尔版本相比，微软Surface Pro 9的ARM型号有两个明显的优势 英特尔版本.第一个优势是被动冷却，确保了可折叠电脑的无声运行。另一方面，我们也不得不说，整体性能处于较低水平。第二个优势是集成了5G调制解调器，但我们也发现，微软迫使客户在这里获得ARM版本，而不是像过去那样提供带有LTE/5G的英特尔型号，这是非常不幸的。
我们认为，现在在Surface Pro 9的标签下提供ARM型号是一个错误。微软以此表明产品水平相似，但在日常操作中根本不是这样的（尽管与Core-i5机型相比价格更高）。
总的来说，配备ARM处理器的Surface Pro肯定有很好的理由存在，而且由于改进了64位模拟，现在可以运行的应用程序明显增多。然而，它仍然不是配备X86处理器的机型的完全替代品。在日常操作中，该设备根本没有那么快，即使在简单的任务中，也会有一些小的停顿或延迟。那些期待采用ARM SoC的MacBook的性能的人 Apple 配备ARM SoC的MacBook的人肯定会在这里感到失望。在这种情况下，我们还认为，微软现在将ARM版本简单地作为Surface Pro 9提供的决定是有问题的。此外，如果客户想要一个集成的LTE/5G调制解调器，就不得不购买ARM型号。
尽管改进了对64位应用程序的兼容性，但配备ARM处理器的Surface Pro 9仍然不是一个成熟的Windows设备，因为不是所有的应用程序都能兼容。它不能满足用户与Surface "Pro "标签连接的要求。
ARM型号还提供了一个稳定的外壳，一个良好的显示屏和良好的扬声器。仅从这一点来看，它是一个很好的设备，但考虑到高昂的价格，与英特尔版本的Surface Pro 9相比，我们很难推荐ARM机型。 英特尔版本的Surface Pro 9.当然，采用高通SoC的SP9也适用于简单的任务，但这也适用于 Apple iPad Pro 12.9它的M2 SoC几乎在所有领域都有优势。
价格和可用性
Surface Pro 9 ARM可以从微软商店购买，起价1169.99美元。，包括键盘和输入笔。亚马逊列出的型号从1299.99美元起。
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
- 03/04/2023 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
