微软Surface Pro 9回顾。可折叠式的，现在有了明显更多的CPU功率

Name: Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U
Brand: Microsoft

现在没有立体声插孔。

微软现在提供带有英特尔或高通CPU的Surface Pro 9。更新后的Alder Lake-U处理器提供了明显更多的CPU功率，可折叠机现在支持Wi-Fi 6E，但耳机插孔已被移除。

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 01/25/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Alder Lake ARM Business Convertible / 2-in-1 MS Surface Thunderbolt Touchscreen Windows

微软对其Surface产品做了一些改变，之前的Surface Pro X ARM平板电脑不再是独立的产品，今后将以Surface Pro 9的名义继续销售。这意味着Surface Pro 9现在有两个变种，即一个配备普通英特尔处理器（989,00美元起），另一个配备ARM芯片（1357,12美元），还支持5G连接。我们还将很快对配备微软SQ3 Adreno 8CX Gen3的新ARM变体进行评测，但配备Alder Lake-U处理器的Surface Pro 9是我们今天的第一个测试对象。

我们的审查样本是顶级CPU变体，配有Core i7 1255U，16GB内存和512GB PCI-SSD。在这种配置下，这台敞篷车的价格为1.879,99美元，尽管你必须考虑到另外300美元的签名键盘和Surface Slim Pen 2。一些在线零售商（取决于你的位置）可能会以更便宜的价格提供这种捆绑服务--例如，我们的捆绑服务可从2130欧元（约2320美元）起。另一个变化涉及Surface Pro 9的商务版，在英特尔版本中也不再提供WWAN模块。

除了新的Alder Lake处理器、更新的WLAN模块和取消音频插孔之外，Surface Pro本身和输入设备都没有重大技术变化。更多信息，我们可以参考我们对以前的Surface Pro型号的评论。

Test device courtesy of cyberport.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U (Surface Pro Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-1255U 10 x 1.2 - 4.7 GHz, 54 W PL2 / Short Burst, 23 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-U

Graphics adapter

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Core: 1250 MHz, RAM: 2600 MHz, 30.0.101.3118

Memory

16 GB

, DDR5

Display

13.00 inch 3:2, 2880 x 1920 pixel 266 PPI, Capacitive, native pen support, LP129WT2-SPA6, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yes, 120 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Storage

Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV, 512 GB

, 429 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, 1 Docking Station Port, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: light sensor, Hall sensor, acceleration sensor, position sensor

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 9.3 x 287 x 209

Battery

47.7 Wh Lithium-Ion, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 15 h

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: IR
Primary Camera: 10 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 60W PSU, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

877 g, Power Supply: 260 g

Price

2200 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
88.4 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2023	Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	877 g	9.3 mm	13.00"	2880x1920
90.1 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2022	Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U i5-1230U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	764 g	7.4 mm	13.00"	2880x1920
88.5 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2021	Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.1 kg	14.5 mm	12.30"	1920x1280
90.3 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2022	HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.4 kg	17.8 mm	13.50"	1920x1280
91.8 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2022	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2, M2 10-Core GPU	682 g	6.4 mm	12.90"	2732x2048
86.8 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2022	Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	1.2 kg	12 mm	13.40"	1920x1200

案例--对敞篷车的微小改动

乍一看，除了端口的新安排外，Surface Pro 9的外壳没有任何变化。重量略有不同，因此内部布局可能也有细微变化。微软提供四种不同的颜色，从我们评测设备的银色（铂金）、宝石蓝、森林绿到石墨（深灰色）。与此相反，ARM机型只有铂金色可供选择。

和以前一样，建造质量是一流的，铝制外壳非常坚固。没有吱吱作响的声音或图像失真，尽管集成的脚架仍然是一个弱点。外壳非常薄，所以当你把Surface Pro 9放在大腿上时，边缘很快就会压到皮肤上，比如说。支架也非常灵活，铰链总是很好地完成它们的工作。

尺寸比较

HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 DIN A4 ❌

设备 - 带有Thunderbolt 4的Surface Pro

端口已经被重新定位，2个USB-C端口（包括Thunderbolt 4）以及专有的Surface Connect端口仍然保留，但微软已经删除了3.5毫米插孔。随之而来的电源适配器使用了Surface Connect端口，但可折叠机也可以通过USB-C充电。有点令人失望的是继续缺乏读卡器，在上一个型号中，读卡器已经被可选的Nano SIM卡槽所取代。由于英特尔型号现在不再配备WWAN模块，微软可以很容易地再次安装一个微型SD读卡器。

左边：2个USB-C 4.0与Thunderbolt 4（40GBit/s，DisplayPort-ALT-Modus 1.4，Power Delivery）。

沟通

如前所述，只有Surface Pro 9的ARM版本提供移动互联网，而英特尔版本则没有。至少WLAN模块已经更新，由于英特尔的AX211模块，现在支持现代WiFi 6E标准。我们能够毫无问题地连接到华硕参考路由器的6GHZ网络，传输速率被证明是非常高和稳定的。

Networking
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1632 (min: 1569) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1628 (min: 1529) MBit/s ∼100%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	986 (min: 831) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1312 (min: 1091) MBit/s ∼81%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AX12	1371 (min: 716) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AX12	1471 (min: 1155) MBit/s ∼100%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1412 (min: 1391) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1138 (min: 984) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1431 (min: 1340) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1020 (min: 477) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	702 (min: 225) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	442 (min: 222) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	747 (min: 145) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	486 (min: 175) MBit/s ∼48%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AX12	1444 (min: 776) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12	1366 (min: 853) MBit/s ∼93%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AX12	1451 (min: 1385) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12	1425 (min: 1295) MBit/s ∼97%

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1628 (1529-1677)

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1631 (1569-1654)

网络摄像头

网络摄像头的配置没有变化，前面有一个500万像素的摄像头，后面有一个1000万像素的摄像头。因此，Surface Pro 9在相机性能方面仍然属于最好的Windows设备。在Surface Pro 9的ARM版本中，甚至提供了更多的相机功能，如对背景的柔焦（或虚化效果），自动眼球接触或自动图像裁剪。

ColorChecker Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U: 8.76 ∆E min: 4.68 - max: 16.31 ∆E

维护

和以前一样，Surface Pro 9仍然为用户提供了更换紧凑的M.2-2230固态硬盘的可能性，而且微软已经使这个过程变得更加容易，因为不再需要SIM工具来打开盖子。相反，有一个小的凹槽，你把手指按进去，就可以打开对面的凹槽（用磁力固定），使盖子可以很容易地取出。然而，其余的内部组件是无法接触到的。

输入设备 - 签名键盘保持不变

由于Surface Pro的尺寸没有变化，微软继续提供两种不同的键盘盖。与上一个型号一样，我们又有了签名键盘和超薄笔2，它可以收起来并在键盘盖内充电。手写笔的功能仍然非常好，而且还支持触觉反馈。然而，由于其扁平的形状，笔的操作不再那么符合人体工程学。

键盘本身提供了一个体面的打字感觉，而且还带有背光。此外，键盘可以以轻微的角度放置（由于有磁铁），但稳定性变得有限。特别是在旅途中，打字的舒适度远不如普通笔记本电脑，而且由于内置的铰链，Surface总体上需要一个大的设置区域（但这也适用于大多数带有键盘盖的可转换产品）。

显示器 - 3:2 IPS，120 Hz

显示屏的基本特征没有变化，仍然是3:2格式的IPS触摸屏，提供2880 x 1920（267 PPI）的分辨率和高达120 Hz的刷新率。60赫兹被预设为默认速率，因此120赫兹必须在设置中手动选择。我们对光面屏幕的主观印象仍然很好。由于有了传感器，亮度和色温被自动调整，这也是很好的功能。

该面板再次来自LG飞利浦，但面板ID已经改变。从根本上说，这些数值是相当的，因为最大亮度再次徘徊在450cd/m²左右。黑色水平稍好，这也是为什么对比度几乎为1.200:1，显得稍好。但竞争设备在这里表现得更好，特别是在对比度方面，如iPad Pro的Mini-LED-显示屏。

没有典型的PWM闪烁，但我们再次记录了在55%或更低的亮度下约30KHz的闪烁。但由于频率高，这不应该是一个问题。这也适用于光晕，因为只有在全亮度下，我们才会注意到在黑暗的屏幕左下方有一个稍微明亮的点。


462 cd/m²	443 cd/m²	463 cd/m²
456 cd/m²	455 cd/m²	463 cd/m²
455 cd/m²	434 cd/m²	450 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LP129WT2-SPA6 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 463 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 453.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 454 cd/m²
Contrast: 1197:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.5
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
67.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U LP129WT2-SPA6, IPS, 2880x1920, 13"	Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U BOE NE13A1M, IPS, 2880x1920, 13"	Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 N123NCA-GS1, a-Si IPS LED, 1920x1280, 12.3"	HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Chi Mei CMN13C0, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.5"	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Liquid Retina XDR Display, Mini-LED, 2732x2048, 12.9"	Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE LQ134N1JW54, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4"	Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 LP129WT212166, IPS, 2880x1920, 13"
Display		6%	2%	3%		1%	12%
Display P3 Coverage	65.6	70.7 8%	67 2%	68.3 4%		67.5 3%	78.2 19%
sRGB Coverage	97.7	99.8 2%	99.2 2%	98.6 1%		97.1 -1%	100 2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	67.7	72.6 7%	68.8 2%	70.2 4%		69.3 2%	77.6 15%
Response Times		-133%	-236%	-272%	-115%	-115%	-92%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	13 ?(6, 7)	44 ?(23.6, 20.4) -238%	63.2 ?(30, 33.2) -386%	66.8 ?(35.6, 31.2) -414%	35.3 ?(14.8, 19.5) -172%	44 ?(22, 22) -238%	46.4 ?(22.8, 23.6) -257%
Response Time Black / White *	19.4 ?(6.8, 12.6)	24.8 ?(11.6, 13.2) -28%	36 ?(18, 18) -86%	44.4 ?(24.4, 20.4) -129%	37.53 ?(16, 21.53) -93%	17.6 ?(6, 11.6) 9%	23.2 ?(10.8, 12.4) -20%
PWM Frequency	29896 ?(55)				6401 ?(100) -79%		29760 ?(50) 0%
Screen		8%	24%	-9%	7%	-0%	-7%
Brightness middle	455	507 11%	419 -8%	369.5 -19%	611 34%	515 13%	444 -2%
Brightness	453	486 7%	406 -10%	350 -23%	605 34%	476 5%	451 0%
Brightness Distribution	94	87 -7%	94 0%	87 -7%	92 -2%	87 -7%	91 -3%
Black Level *	0.38	0.34 11%	0.23 39%	0.24 37%		0.35 8%	0.43 -13%
Contrast	1197	1491 25%	1822 52%	1540 29%		1471 23%	1033 -14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.7	2.04 -20%	1.1 35%	2.3 -35%	1.4 18%	1.6 6%	2 -18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.8	3.1 18%	2.2 42%	4.34 -14%	3.3 13%	4 -5%	3.2 16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.5	0.86 43%	0.5 67%	0.6 60%		1.2 20%	1.7 -13%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.5	1.8 -20%	1.5 -0%	3.1 -107%	2.3 -53%	2.5 -67%	1.8 -20%
Gamma	2.17 ^101%	2.12 ^104%	2.06 ^107%	2.1 ^105%	2.22 ^99%	2.2 ^100%	2.11 ^104%
CCT	6761 ^96%	6561 ^99%	6524 ^100%	6248 ^104%	6930 ^94%	6939 ^94%	6417 ^101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)			62.8
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)			99.2
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-40% / -13%	-70% / -18%	-93% / -44%	-54% / -33%	-38% / -16%	-29% / -21%

* ... smaller is better

我们使用专业的CalMAN软件（X-Rite i1 Pro 2）测试了该面板：它在交付状态下的表现已经非常好，尽管我们无法检测到sRGB和Vivid配置文件之间的任何差异。灰度显示出轻微的偏色，但这在实践中并不明显。色彩偏差符合目标；只有100%的颜色显示出稍大的偏差（其中只有绿色高于3的目标值）。我们能够通过我们自己的校准（上面有免费下载的配置文件）来改善这些值，但这并不是真的需要。然而，在色彩空间覆盖率方面，新的面板有些糟糕，因为sRGB只达到了97.7%的覆盖率（以前是100%），P3和AdobeRGB也比以前低一些。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
19.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6.8 ms rise
19.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 12.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

29896 Hz

≤ 55 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 29896 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 55 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 29896 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

光滑的屏幕表面并不适合在户外使用，所以你基本上要尽可能地避免光源的反射。只有这样，最大亮度水平才足以让人舒适地观看显示内容。视角的稳定性没有留下任何批评的余地。

性能--Alder Lake-U提供明显更多的动力

新款Surface Pro 9的英特尔型号只提供15瓦级的Alder Lake处理器，要么就是酷睿i5 1235U或酷睿i7 1255U。那些需要16GB内存或256GB存储空间的人将不得不选择i7变体。最大32GB内存和1TB SDD是可能的（2499.99美元）。

测试条件

微软只使用Windows的电源设置，其名称与其他Windows设备略有不同（推荐、更好的性能和最佳性能）。我们使用 "最佳性能"进行基准测试，并使用默认的60赫兹模式进行能量测量。

处理器 - 酷睿i7-1255U

芯片酷睿i7 1255U属于英特尔目前的Alder Lake一代，结合了两个快速性能核心和8个效率核心。它基本上是一个15瓦的CPU，但微软在这里给了处理器自由发挥的空间，我们观察到在单核负载下最大消耗约为20瓦，在多核负载下高达54瓦，这也接近英特尔规定的Alder Lake-U处理器的最大极限。当然，这些数值只维持了很短的时间，但Surface Pro 9在恒定负载下可以维持35瓦，大约4.5分钟后降至25瓦左右，甚至进一步降至22瓦。当然，这些高数值是否有意义是另一个问题，因为我们最近对Alder Lake-U CPU的分析显示，Alder Lake-P芯片（例如酷睿i7 1260P)有两个额外的核心，在这样的数值下能提供更多的性能。

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U: Ø1293 (1168.77-1576.35)

Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U: Ø800 (632-1254.35)

Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7: Ø528 (426.12-863.97)

HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U: Ø1069 (981.47-1368.74)

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2190 (2140.64-2779.32)

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7: Ø839 (789.09-994.68)

在CPU测试中，Surface Pro 9仅被华硕ROG Z13击败。华硕ROG Flow Z13胜出，后者也配备了 Core i9 12900H。单核和多核性能都明显优于旧的 Surface Pro 8与其配备的酷睿i7 1185G7.为了与 M2处理器中的 iPad Pro的M2处理器进行比较。我们已经包括了 MacBook Air因为iPad上不支持所有的基准测试。Apple M2的速度不大，但效率更高（单核~5瓦，多核~20瓦）。

在电池模式下，CPU性能略差，因为功率限制降低到45/30瓦。在Cinebench R23多核测试中，这导致性能下降略低于5%，但单核性能并不差。更多CPU基准测试可在这里.

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H	89.6 pt
Average of class Convertible	66.7 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	64.8 pt
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU ^-5! Apple M2	63 pt
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U	62.9 pt
Average Intel Core i7-1255U	61 pt
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U	57 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7	51.7 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 ^-1! Intel Core i7-1160G7	33.2 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H	15229 Points +60%
Average of class Convertible (616 - 18070, n=63, last 2 years)	10263 Points +8%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	9517 Points
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2	8517 Points -11%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (5269 - 9628, n=10)	7996 Points -16%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U	7884 (7269.65^min - 7883.61^max) Points -17%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U	7264 (4444.94^min - 7264.12^max) Points -24%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7	5668 Points -40%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7	3008 (2913.49^min - 3007.87^max) Points -68%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H	1917 Points +16%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U	1691 Points +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	1656 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (1408 - 1775, n=10)	1625 Points -2%
Average of class Convertible (308 - 1970, n=63, last 2 years)	1610 Points -3%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2	1580 Points -5%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7	1512 Points -9%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U	1512 Points -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7	1079 Points -35%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H	5491 Points +52%
Average of class Convertible (242 - 6954, n=63, last 2 years)	3888 Points +8%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	3616 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (2095 - 3702, n=10)	3044 Points -16%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U	2973 Points -18%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U	2802 Points -23%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2	2306 Points -36%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7	2097 Points -42%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7	2068 Points -43%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H	734 Points +15%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U	653 Points +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	638 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (550 - 682, n=10)	634 Points -1%
Average of class Convertible (149.8 - 755, n=62, last 2 years)	617 Points -3%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U	580 Points -9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7	578 Points -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7	501 Points -21%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2	380 Points -40%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H	2779 (2140.64^min - 2779.32^max) Points +76%
Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2889, n=65, last 2 years)	1718 Points +9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	1576 (1168.77^min - 1576.35^max) Points
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U	1369 (981.47^min - 1368.74^max) Points -13%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (919 - 1577, n=10)	1330 Points -16%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U	1254 (632^min - 1254.35^max) Points -20%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2	1212 (917^min - 1212^max) Points -23%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7	995 (789.61^min - 994.68^max) Points -37%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7	864 (426.12^min - 863.97^max) Points -45%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H	275 Points +24%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U	243 Points +9%
Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 287, n=62, last 2 years)	235 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (161 - 251, n=11)	229 Points +3%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7	224 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2	223 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	222 Points
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U	221 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7	170 Points -23%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7	1115 Seconds * -192%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2	616.7 Seconds * -61%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7	569 Seconds * -49%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U	503 Seconds * -32%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (372 - 601, n=10)	430 Seconds * -13%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U	417 Seconds * -9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	382 Seconds *
Average of class Convertible (193 - 1059, n=59, last 2 years)	368 Seconds * +4%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H	217 Seconds * +43%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H	64146 MIPS +72%
Average of class Convertible (12977 - 72400, n=60, last 2 years)	42699 MIPS +14%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	37320 MIPS
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U	34505 MIPS -8%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U	34106 MIPS -9%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (24126 - 37365, n=10)	33261 MIPS -11%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7	24679 MIPS -34%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7	17340 MIPS -54%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H	6102 MIPS +18%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (5059 - 5529, n=10)	5284 MIPS +3%
Average of class Convertible (3672 - 6493, n=60, last 2 years)	5229 MIPS +2%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U	5218 MIPS +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7	5168 MIPS 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	5150 MIPS
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U	4870 MIPS -5%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H	13796 Points +56%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2	8991 Points +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	8821 Points
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U	8710 Points -1%
Average of class Convertible (663 - 14016, n=63, last 2 years)	8658 Points -2%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U	7309 Points -17%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (4463 - 8821, n=11)	7283 Points -17%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7	5759 Points -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7	4843 Points -45%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2	1925 Points +12%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H	1892 Points +11%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	1712 Points
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U	1686 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (1560 - 1712, n=11)	1644 Points -4%
Average of class Convertible (319 - 2003, n=63, last 2 years)	1642 Points -4%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7	1548 Points -10%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U	1529 Points -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7	1409 Points -18%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H	17.2 fps +70%
Average of class Convertible (0.73 - 20.1, n=62, last 2 years)	11.3 fps +12%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	10.1 fps
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U	9.11 fps -10%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (6.31 - 10.1, n=10)	9 fps -11%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U	8.33 fps -18%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7	6.49 fps -36%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7	3.75 fps -63%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7	61.3 s * -19%
Average of class Convertible (42 - 121.5, n=59, last 2 years)	51.5 s * -0%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	51.3 s *
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U	51.2 s * -0%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7	51.1 s * -0%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U	49.9 s * +3%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (44.5 - 52.5, n=10)	49.3 s * +4%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H	41.9 s * +18%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7	0.76 sec * -46%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7	0.568 sec * -9%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U	0.527 sec * -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	0.52 sec *
Average of class Convertible (0.4102 - 1.013, n=59, last 2 years)	0.517 sec * +1%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (0.4688 - 0.558, n=10)	0.502 sec * +3%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U	0.4892 sec * +6%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H	0.428 sec * +18%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1576 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

90.9 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

222 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

3616 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

638 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1656 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

9517 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	91 pt
Average of class Convertible	84.8 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	73.6 pt
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	64.2 pt
Average Intel Core i7-1255U	62.7 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	61.6 pt
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	58.5 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	47.1 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Convertible (468 - 25226, n=63, last 2 years)	9993 KRay/s +23%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	8127 KRay/s
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	7594 KRay/s -7%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7249 KRay/s -11%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (4313 - 8127, n=10)	6677 KRay/s -18%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6649 KRay/s -18%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	6360 KRay/s -22%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4347 KRay/s -47%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Convertible (2644 - 106512, n=62, last 2 years)	50581 Points +22%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	41353 Points
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	35010 Points -15%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	34117 Points -17%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (19813 - 41353, n=10)	34070 Points -18%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	31714 Points -23%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	30075 Points -27%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	20209 Points -51%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	2698 MB/s +29%
Average of class Convertible (182 - 4764, n=62, last 2 years)	2385 MB/s +14%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2089 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1983 MB/s -5%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (1325 - 2135, n=10)	1813 MB/s -13%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1787 MB/s -14%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	1711 MB/s -18%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1364 MB/s -35%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	103950 Points +58%
Average of class Convertible (10502 - 120368, n=62, last 2 years)	69661 Points +6%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	65820 Points
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	65722 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (61375 - 65892, n=10)	64472 Points -2%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	52533 Points -20%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	47866 Points -27%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	44017 Points -33%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	9125 Points +79%
Average of class Convertible (659 - 14835, n=62, last 2 years)	6921 Points +36%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5095 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4598 Points -10%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (3577 - 5095, n=10)	4540 Points -11%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4465 Points -12%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	3947 Points -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3308 Points -35%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Convertible (1420 - 56839, n=62, last 2 years)	25716 Points +29%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	20833 Points +5%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	19899 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	18122 Points -9%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	16992 Points -15%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (11759 - 20187, n=10)	16981 Points -15%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	15896 Points -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	11908 Points -40%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	82978 MB/s +95%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	50711 MB/s +19%
Average of class Convertible (1279 - 169089, n=62, last 2 years)	49947 MB/s +17%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	42553 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	42339 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (27900 - 67458, n=10)	39078 MB/s -8%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	35388 MB/s -17%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	31941 MB/s -25%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	919 MB/s +56%
Average of class Convertible (61.4 - 1088, n=62, last 2 years)	670 MB/s +14%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	588 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (393 - 640, n=10)	539 MB/s -8%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	524 MB/s -11%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	495 MB/s -16%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	319 MB/s -46%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	226 MB/s -62%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Convertible (254 - 13175, n=62, last 2 years)	5261 KRay/s +20%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	4417 KRay/s 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4400 KRay/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3857 KRay/s -12%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3629 KRay/s -18%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (2474 - 4400, n=10)	3623 KRay/s -18%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	3305 KRay/s -25%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2231 KRay/s -49%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	44054 MPixel/s
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	43917 MPixel/s 0%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	41880 MPixel/s -5%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	37197 MPixel/s -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	37130 MPixel/s -16%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	37042 MPixel/s -16%
Average of class Convertible (5136 - 53406, n=62, last 2 years)	36802 MPixel/s -16%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (13899 - 44054, n=10)	32417 MPixel/s -26%

系统性能

Surface Pro 9的主观性能非常好，所有输入都能实现，没有延迟或挂起。PCIe固态硬盘无疑要对此负责。合成基准中的性能也非常好。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	6335 Points +21%
Average of class Convertible (1486 - 7963, n=59, last 2 years)	5978 Points +14%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1265U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	5766 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4676 - 5523, n=9)	5313 Points +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	5257 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	5041 Points -4%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1230U	4943 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	4640 Points -12%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1265U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	11418 Points +13%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	10755 Points +7%
Average of class Convertible (3975 - 12059, n=59, last 2 years)	10581 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9381 - 11654, n=9)	10367 Points +3%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1230U	10139 Points +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	10062 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	9734 Points -3%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	9689 Points -4%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	9785 Points +49%
Average of class Convertible (2764 - 10800, n=59, last 2 years)	7965 Points +22%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1265U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	7311 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6530 - 7418, n=9)	6902 Points +5%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1230U	6692 Points +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	6553 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	6537 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	6155 Points -6%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Convertible (811 - 12360, n=59, last 2 years)	7035 Points +18%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	6556 Points +10%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1265U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	6234 Points +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	5978 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4498 - 6203, n=9)	5709 Points -4%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	5488 Points -8%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1230U	4833 Points -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	4525 Points -24%

CrossMark / Overall
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	2108 Points +41%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1265U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1615 Points +8%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	1584 Points +6%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1499 Points
Average of class Convertible (310 - 1912, n=59, last 2 years)	1486 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1329 - 1573, n=9)	1459 Points -3%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	1394 Points -7%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1230U	1383 Points -8%

CrossMark / Productivity
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	2033 Points +39%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1265U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1568 Points +7%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1465 Points
Average of class Convertible (389 - 1790, n=59, last 2 years)	1452 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1364 - 1554, n=9)	1448 Points -1%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	1419 Points -3%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	1389 Points -5%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1230U	1356 Points -7%

CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	2165 Points +34%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	1954 Points +21%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1265U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1696 Points +5%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1612 Points
Average of class Convertible (252 - 2183, n=59, last 2 years)	1598 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1372 - 1660, n=9)	1538 Points -5%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	1513 Points -6%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1230U	1469 Points -9%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	2168 Points +68%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1265U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1521 Points +18%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1293 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1117 - 1434, n=9)	1275 Points -1%
Average of class Convertible (295 - 1868, n=59, last 2 years)	1266 Points -2%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1230U	1224 Points -5%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	1176 Points -9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	1103 Points -15%

Jetstream 2 / Total Score
Average of class Convertible (157.5 - 435, n=26, last 2 years)	257 Points +7%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	240.5 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (206 - 249, n=7)	237 Points -1%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1230U	226.697 Points -6%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	225.315 Points -6%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	221.3 Points -8%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	184.3 Points -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	155 Points -36%

Speedometer 2.0 / Result
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	376 runs/min +44%
Average of class Convertible (150 - 357, n=13, last 2 years)	265 runs/min +2%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (222 - 299, n=5)	264 runs/min +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	261 runs/min
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	193 runs/min -26%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	189 runs/min -28%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	342 Points +29%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	310 Points +17%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1265U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	281 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (200 - 366, n=9)	275 Points +4%
Average of class Convertible (84.2 - 407, n=62, last 2 years)	270 Points +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	265 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	251 Points -5%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1230U	248 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	222 Points -16%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1265U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	241 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (183.4 - 249, n=9)	229 Points 0%
Average of class Convertible (49.4 - 314, n=59, last 2 years)	229 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	228 Points
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	227 Points 0%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1230U	220 Points -4%

PCMark 10 Score		5257 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	74264 MB/s +11%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	67017 MB/s
Average of class Convertible (16353 - 108544, n=62, last 2 years)	64619 MB/s -4%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	63740 MB/s -5%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	60944 MB/s -9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	59683 MB/s -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	56073 MB/s -16%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (22846 - 67017, n=10)	50373 MB/s -25%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	69882 MB/s +17%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	69343 MB/s +16%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	59579 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	58483 MB/s -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	58252 MB/s -2%
Average of class Convertible (12706 - 125359, n=62, last 2 years)	58210 MB/s -2%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	55505 MB/s -7%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (22877 - 67398, n=10)	50511 MB/s -15%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	76027 MB/s +22%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	65665 MB/s +6%
Average of class Convertible (10177 - 117920, n=62, last 2 years)	65576 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	63215 MB/s +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	62132 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	61766 MB/s -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	61266 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (22883 - 65839, n=10)	52362 MB/s -16%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Convertible (7.4 - 173, n=62, last 2 years)	113.1 ns * -12%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	112.4 ns * -11%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	106 ns * -5%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	104.3 ns * -3%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	101.2 ns *
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	101 ns * -0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	98.3 ns * +3%
Average Intel Core i7-1255U (76 - 163.2, n=10)	88.5 ns * +13%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

在我们的标准化延迟测试中（网页浏览、YouTube 4K播放、CPU负载），当前BIOS版本的新Surface Pro 9的表现比其前代产品因此只是有条件地适用于实时音频应用。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1265U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	4978.2 μs * -156%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1230U	3703.9 μs * -91%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1942.1 μs *
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	1474 μs * +24%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	489 μs * +75%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	464.6 μs * +76%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

微软仍然使用紧凑的M.2-2230固态硬盘，这些设备也可以由用户更换。我们的评测样本中使用了三星的512GB驱动器，根据微软工具，它似乎是通过PCIe 4.0连接的。然而，最大传输率被限制在3.4GB/s左右，我们不知道到底是固态硬盘还是Surface Pro在这里的原因。话又说回来，这在日常使用中并不发挥主要作用，速度完全足够。在512GB中，安装操作系统后仍有429GB可用。更多的SSD基准测试列在我们的技术部分.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3499.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2517.4 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 333.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 268.46 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 60.54 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 102.54 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 263.65 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 503.97 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 ^-11! Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	92.4 pt
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	84.7 pt
Average of class Convertible	56.3 pt
Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	51.7 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	49.6 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	41.6 pt
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U	37.2 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	27.4 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	4190 (4126.36^min - 4189.69^max) MB/s +68%
Average of class Convertible (321 - 4714, n=61, last 2 years)	2699 MB/s +8%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U	2600 (2577.19^min - 2599.88^max) MB/s +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	2492 (2463.73^min - 2492.26^max) MB/s
Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (2423 - 2597, n=4)	2489 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	2252 (2241.23^min - 2252.02^max) MB/s -10%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	1770 (1735.81^min - 1770.42^max) MB/s -29%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	1381 (1368.8^min - 1380.76^max) MB/s -45%
seq write
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	4036 (3993.4^min - 4035.87^max) MB/s +107%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	3217 (2128.61^min - 3217.03^max) MB/s +65%
Average of class Convertible (195.5 - 5301, n=61, last 2 years)	2529 MB/s +29%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1954 (1874.02^min - 1954.13^max) MB/s
Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (1776 - 1965, n=4)	1904 MB/s -3%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U	1861 (510.5^min - 1861.27^max) MB/s -5%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	1324 (1199.03^min - 1323.72^max) MB/s -32%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	904 (889.3^min - 904.16^max) MB/s -54%
seq q8 t1 read
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	6746 (6241.44^min - 6746.33^max) MB/s +93%
Average of class Convertible (399 - 7152, n=61, last 2 years)	4642 MB/s +33%
Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (3499 - 3615, n=4)	3556 MB/s +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	3499 (2732.17^min - 3499.31^max) MB/s
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U	3446 (2884.63^min - 3445.62^max) MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	3345 (2561.25^min - 3345.4^max) MB/s -4%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	2260 (1924^min - 2259.89^max) MB/s -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	1927 (1748.88^min - 1926.58^max) MB/s -45%
seq q8 t1 write
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	4885 (4874.72^min - 4885.4^max) MB/s +103%
Average of class Convertible (215 - 5667, n=61, last 2 years)	3391 MB/s +41%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	3215 (3201.61^min - 3214.59^max) MB/s +33%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	2410 (2398.51^min - 2410.26^max) MB/s
Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (2210 - 2498, n=4)	2388 MB/s -1%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U	2137 (2113.72^min - 2136.79^max) MB/s -11%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	1588 (1424.3^min - 1588.17^max) MB/s -34%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	1028 (1010.9^min - 1028.48^max) MB/s -57%
4k q1 t1 read
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	90.3 (89.31^min - 90.25^max) MB/s +13%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	79.7 (72.36^min - 79.71^max) MB/s
Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (64.9 - 79.7, n=4)	74.2 MB/s -7%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	67.4 (65.12^min - 67.38^max) MB/s -15%
Average of class Convertible (11.3 - 90.3, n=61, last 2 years)	57.7 MB/s -28%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	55.7 (54.81^min - 55.71^max) MB/s -30%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U	38.9 (38.46^min - 38.93^max) MB/s -51%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	29 (28.91^min - 28.97^max) MB/s -64%
4k q1 t1 write
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	391 (388.2^min - 391^max) MB/s +211%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	225 (211.01^min - 224.54^max) MB/s +79%
Average of class Convertible (48.4 - 398, n=61, last 2 years)	141.9 MB/s +13%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	139 (135.15^min - 138.9^max) MB/s +11%
Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (125.5 - 132, n=4)	128.6 MB/s +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	125.6 (122.85^min - 125.61^max) MB/s
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U	125.4 (115.4^min - 125.44^max) MB/s 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	67.8 (67.1^min - 67.83^max) MB/s -46%
4k q32 t16 read
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3426 (2574.76^min - 3426.01^max) MB/s +415%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	1846 (1842.83^min - 1846^max) MB/s +178%
Average of class Convertible (156.4 - 3881, n=61, last 2 years)	1003 MB/s +51%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	805 (800.4^min - 804.86^max) MB/s +21%
Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (476 - 1025, n=4)	695 MB/s +5%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	665 (643^min - 665.11^max) MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	657 (462.37^min - 656.94^max) MB/s -1%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U	416 (407.75^min - 416.13^max) MB/s -37%
4k q32 t16 write
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	2751 (2683.65^min - 2751.16^max) MB/s +677%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	2242 (1641.6^min - 2242.43^max) MB/s +533%
Average of class Convertible (99.8 - 3537, n=61, last 2 years)	690 MB/s +95%
Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (339 - 631, n=4)	421 MB/s +19%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	384 (378.78^min - 383.65^max) MB/s +8%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	354 (346.58^min - 354.16^max) MB/s
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U	315 (308.19^min - 315.05^max) MB/s -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	158 (153.33^min - 158.09^max) MB/s -55%

AS SSD
Score Total
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	7472 Points +168%
Average of class Convertible (394 - 8028, n=59, last 2 years)	3690 Points +33%
Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (2783 - 3533, n=4)	3085 Points +11%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	2783 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	2566 Points -8%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U	1952 Points -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	1551 Points -44%
Score Read
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	2592 Points +208%
Average of class Convertible (186 - 3137, n=59, last 2 years)	1225 Points +46%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	1184 Points +41%
Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (791 - 1028, n=4)	921 Points +10%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U	878 Points +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	841 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	805 Points -4%
Score Write
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	3541 Points +128%
Average of class Convertible (116 - 3348, n=59, last 2 years)	1896 Points +22%
Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (1470 - 2029, n=4)	1731 Points +12%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1551 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	818 Points -47%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U	714 Points -54%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	371 Points -76%
Seq Read
Average of class Convertible (473 - 5684, n=59, last 2 years)	3547 MB/s +27%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U	3088.89 MB/s +10%
Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (2802 - 3018, n=4)	2904 MB/s +4%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	2903 MB/s +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	2802 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	1972 MB/s -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	1760 MB/s -37%
Seq Write
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	2886 MB/s +71%
Average of class Convertible (180 - 5229, n=59, last 2 years)	2152 MB/s +27%
Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (1521 - 1865, n=4)	1709 MB/s +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1692 MB/s
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U	1143.28 MB/s -32%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	856 MB/s -49%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	761 MB/s -55%
4K Read
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	88.7 MB/s +73%
Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (51.2 - 72.4, n=4)	63.1 MB/s +23%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	56.7 MB/s +11%
Average of class Convertible (11.4 - 82.4, n=59, last 2 years)	53.9 MB/s +5%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	51.17 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	47.68 MB/s -7%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U	37.76 MB/s -26%
4K Write
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	334.6 MB/s +127%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U	181.74 MB/s +24%
Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (147.1 - 198.9, n=4)	181.5 MB/s +23%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	176.4 MB/s +20%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	176 MB/s +20%
Average of class Convertible (41.5 - 347, n=59, last 2 years)	160.7 MB/s +9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	147.09 MB/s
4K-64 Read
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	2213 MB/s +334%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	930 MB/s +83%
Average of class Convertible (126.9 - 2508, n=59, last 2 years)	818 MB/s +61%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	581 MB/s +14%
Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (452 - 655, n=4)	568 MB/s +11%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U	531.07 MB/s +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	509.42 MB/s
4K-64 Write
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	2917 MB/s +136%
Average of class Convertible (38.4 - 2855, n=59, last 2 years)	1520 MB/s +23%
Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (1111 - 1679, n=4)	1378 MB/s +12%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1234.89 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	557 MB/s -55%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U	418.03 MB/s -66%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	118.5 MB/s -90%
Access Time Read
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	0.155 ms * -210%
Average of class Convertible (0.021 - 0.244, n=59, last 2 years)	0.08632 ms * -73%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U	0.057 ms * -14%
Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (0.029 - 0.098, n=4)	0.052 ms * -4%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	0.05 ms *
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	0.036 ms * +28%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	0.028 ms * +44%
Access Time Write
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U	0.561 ms * -1770%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	0.188 ms * -527%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	0.182 ms * -507%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe	0.156 ms * -420%
Average of class Convertible (0.017 - 0.445, n=59, last 2 years)	0.09741 ms * -225%
Average Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV (0.03 - 0.091, n=4)	0.04675 ms * -56%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	0.03 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Dauerleistung Lesen: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U: Ø3489 (3096.44-3507.81)

图形卡

英特尔的Alder Lake CPU仍然配备了著名的Iris Xe Graphics G7.结合酷睿i5 1235U，使用的是具有80个执行单元的芯片；在我们与酷睿i7的评测样本中，我们使用的是具有96个EU的更快芯片。在性能方面，与旧型号没有区别，来自AMD和Apple 的集成GPU明显更快（尽管目前实际上没有可与AMD硬件相比的转换器/平板电脑）。

其性能完全可以满足日常使用，高分辨率视频的运行也没有问题，但游戏通常被限制在最低或中等细节和降低分辨率。那些热衷于游戏的人可以连接一个外部GPU，或者应该看看ROG Flow Z13，它提供了更多的游戏性能，其 RTX 3050.

至少在长时间游戏过程中，GPU性能保持稳定。然而，在电池供电时，性能下降了约75%。更多的GPU基准测试可在这里.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 ^-3! Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	100 pt
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE ^-2! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	100 pt
Average of class Convertible	62.9 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U	49 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 ^-2! Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7	47.6 pt
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	46 pt
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 ^-2! Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1265U	43.5 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 ^-2! Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1160G7	33.7 pt
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U ^-2! Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1230U	27.1 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	13939 Points +123%
Average of class Convertible (471 - 40768, n=61, last 2 years)	8672 Points +39%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7	6825 Points +9%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2867 - 7676, n=202)	6353 Points +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U	6251 Points
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1265U	6116 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1160G7	5128 Points -18%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1230U	3844 Points -39%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	10600 Points +92%
Average of class Convertible (365 - 29684, n=62, last 2 years)	6383 Points +16%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7	5570 Points +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U	5517 Points
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1265U	4977 Points -10%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2286 - 6482, n=215)	4920 Points -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1160G7	3355 Points -39%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1230U	3227 Points -42%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	4041 Points +152%
Average of class Convertible (94 - 11749, n=61, last 2 years)	2259 Points +41%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7	1666 Points +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U	1606 Points
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1265U	1601 Points 0%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (707 - 1871, n=212)	1495 Points -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1160G7	1319 Points -18%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1230U	936 Points -42%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	6909 Points +87%
Average of class Convertible (2276 - 15020, n=12, last 2 years)	4813 Points +30%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U	3692 Points
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2054 - 4304, n=21)	3545 Points -4%
Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	6919 Points +82%
Average of class Convertible (824 - 15282, n=9, last 2 years)	4587 Points +20%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U	3812 Points
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1978 - 4255, n=19)	3450 Points -9%

3DMark 11 Performance		6903 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		4873 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		1821 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender - v3.3 Classroom CPU
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1230U	1023 Seconds * -40%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1265U	820 Seconds * -12%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U	730 Seconds *
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (336 - 1259, n=101)	696 Seconds * +5%
Average of class Convertible (326 - 2067, n=60, last 2 years)	657 Seconds * +10%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	100 pt
Average of class Convertible	40.5 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	33.7 pt
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	31.4 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	30.7 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 ^-4! Intel Core i7-1160G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	22.5 pt
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U ^-2! Intel Core i5-1230U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	20.7 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	37.1 (34^min, 35^P1) fps +190%
Average of class Convertible (10 - 123.3, n=49, last 2 years)	21.3 fps +66%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	14.7 (13^min, 13.99^P1) fps +15%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	14.5 (13^min) fps +13%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	12.8 (12^min, 12^P1) fps
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	8.5 (7^min) fps -34%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	54.9 (7.72^min, 37^P1) fps +418%
Average of class Convertible (7.07 - 114.3, n=49, last 2 years)	17.1 fps +61%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	12.8 (4.32^min, 9.62^P1) fps +21%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10.6 (5.04^min, 7.41^P1) fps
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10.1 (4.41^min, 6.8^P1) fps -5%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	6.06 (1.275^min, 2.14^P1) fps -43%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	106 fps +531%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	26.9 fps +60%
Average of class Convertible (4.48 - 107.1, n=60, last 2 years)	21.7 fps +29%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	16.8 fps
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	16.5 fps -2%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	68 (49.8^min, 52.8^P1) fps +160%
Average of class Convertible (10.8 - 196.9, n=56, last 2 years)	37.7 fps +44%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	27 fps +3%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	26.2 (7.4^min, 9.36^P1) fps
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	25.5 (6^min, 8.73^P1) fps -3%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	137 (116.9^min) fps +140%
Average of class Convertible (5.4 - 158.3, n=62, last 2 years)	59.3 fps +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	57 (48^min) fps
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	56.7 (32.8^min) fps -1%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	54.5 (46.8^min) fps -4%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	34.2 (31.2^min) fps -40%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	31 (20.4^min) fps -46%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	92.5 fps +193%
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	35.1 fps +11%
Average of class Convertible (3.91 - 101.4, n=62, last 2 years)	32.8 fps +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	31.6 fps
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	30.2 fps -4%
Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	22 fps -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	20.7 fps -34%

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø12.8 (12-14)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)	104.3	93.1	24.7	10.6
The Witcher 3 (2015)	91	59	33	12.8
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	104.2	82.2	64.8	57
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	42.9	24.2	16.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	46.3	36.6	31.6
Far Cry 5 (2018)	28	24	20
Strange Brigade (2018)	88.9	41.7	32.5	26.2
F1 2021 (2021)	107.8	51.6	40.6	27.8
Farming Simulator 22 (2021)	81	37	28	26
F1 22 (2022)	47.4	43.5	30.7

排放 - 更快的CPU会导致更多的风扇活动

噪声

Surface Pro 9的风扇在最大速度下与旧版Surface Pro 8相当，在满负荷时达到近42 dB(A)。这个小风扇明显可以听到，但更有问题的是，由于高功率限制，风扇在日常使用中更频繁地启动。因此，你应该为简单的任务选择一个较弱的能源模式，那么在普通的使用中，可折叠机可以保持较长时间的安静。没有发现其他电子噪音。这两台 XPS 13 9315和 iPad Pro在这里都有明显的优势，当然，因为它们是被动冷却的，因此保持安静。

Noise Level

Idle		24.3 / 24.3 / 24.3 dB(A)
Load		37.9 / 41.8 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.3 dB(A)

	Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G	HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1265U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
Noise		2%	8%	-2%	-0%
off / environment *	24.3	25.1 -3%	24.6 -1%	24.5 -1%	24.7 -2%
Idle Minimum *	24.3	25.1 -3%	24.6 -1%	24.5 -1%	24.7 -2%
Idle Average *	24.3	25.1 -3%	24.6 -1%	24.5 -1%	24.7 -2%
Idle Maximum *	24.3	26 -7%	24.6 -1%	24.5 -1%	24.7 -2%
Load Average *	37.9	34.6 9%	27.8 27%	41 -8%	36.8 3%
Witcher 3 ultra *	39.6	34.6 13%	33.4 16%	41 -4%	36.8 7%
Load Maximum *	41.8	37 11%	33.4 20%	41 2%	43.8 -5%

* ... smaller is better

温度

Surface Pro 9的金属外壳在日常使用和轻度任务中几乎不发热，但我们在高负荷情况下（例如CPU高负荷或游戏时）测得背面温度超过45℃。由于金属表面，这种感觉令人不快，在这种情况下，你不应该用手握住设备，而应该把它放在大腿或桌子上。

压力测试显示出与纯CPU负载时相同的行为。在达到60瓦的峰值后，处理器在几分钟内保持在35瓦，然后稳定在22瓦。值得注意的是，微软甚至超过了（英特尔）为Alder Lake-U CPU规定的55瓦的最大消耗。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


41.1 °C	44.3 °C	44.6 °C
41.4 °C	42.2 °C	41.6 °C
42.5 °C	42.6 °C	42.2 °C

Maximum: 44.6 °C
Average: 42.5 °C


45.4 °C	45.9 °C	44.6 °C
42.5 °C	45.1 °C	44.6 °C
41.1 °C	41.9 °C	42.4 °C

Maximum: 45.9 °C
Average: 43.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41.7 °C | Room Temperature 20.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


24.7 °C	24.6 °C	24.4 °C
24.7 °C	24.6 °C	24.1 °C
24.6 °C	24.8 °C	24.5 °C

Maximum: 24.8 °C
Average: 24.6 °C


24.6 °C	25.3 °C	25.3 °C
24.1 °C	25.3 °C	25.3 °C
24.1 °C	24.7 °C	24.9 °C

Maximum: 25.3 °C
Average: 24.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 23 °C | Room Temperature 20.1 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


40.7 °C	43.1 °C	43.2 °C
40.8 °C	41.4 °C	40.8 °C
40.5 °C	41.8 °C	40.9 °C

Maximum: 43.2 °C
Average: 41.5 °C


43.6 °C	44.1 °C	43.2 °C
41.2 °C	43.2 °C	43.7 °C
40.7 °C	41.5 °C	42.2 °C

Maximum: 44.1 °C
Average: 42.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.8 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42.6 °C / 108.7 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-14.5 °C / -26.1 F).

	Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 Intel Core i7-1160G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU	Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Heat		1%	5%	14%	-3%	-11%	2%
Maximum Upper Side *	44.6	41.8 6%	39 13%	32.8 26%	36.9 17%	45.3 -2%	45 -1%
Maximum Bottom *	45.9	38.2 17%	41.7 9%	33.4 27%	37.6 18%	48.3 -5%	47.2 -3%
Idle Upper Side *	24.8	27.4 -10%	25.6 -3%	24.6 1%	31.9 -29%	29.2 -18%	24.1 3%
Idle Bottom *	25.3	27.2 -8%	25.6 -1%	24.6 3%	29.4 -16%	30 -19%	23.4 8%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

两个立体声扬声器（2瓦）仍然非常好，听起来很有体积感。然而，你不应该在低音方面期望太多，这对这个设备类别来说通常是真实的（例如，也适用于iPad Pro的扬声器）。iPad Pro).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理--120赫兹耗费电池寿命

消耗功率

我们还在60赫兹模式下进行了功率测量，但5.1至11.3瓦的空闲值比旧型号的略高。负载下的数值相似，但处理器的高功率限制在满载时变得很明显，因为我们在最初的~30秒内达到了电源的极限68瓦。在这里，设备不得不短暂地利用电池来提供所需的能量。之后，消耗量在较低的数值上趋于平稳（先是~58瓦，然后是~46瓦），所以60瓦的电源在实践中仍然是足够的。

微软能够降低关机和待机时的功耗。该电源还提供一个USB-A端口，可以用来给智能手机充电，例如（最大5瓦）。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.45 / 0.61 Watt
Idle	5.1 / 9.8 / 11.3 Watt
Load	47.5 / 68.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV, IPS, 2880x1920, 13"	Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U i5-1230U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, , IPS, 2880x1920, 13"	Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G, a-Si IPS LED, 1920x1280, 12.3"	HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.5"	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 128 GB NVMe, Mini-LED, 2732x2048, 12.9"	Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4"	Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe, IPS, 2880x1920, 13"	Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Average of class Convertible
Power Consumption		22%	26%	19%	36%	-54%	7%	4%	4%
Idle Minimum *	5.1	5.2 -2%	4 22%	3.4 33%	2.54 50%	8.8 -73%	3.9 24%	5.34 ?(2.2 - 46.5, n=193) -5%	5.21 ?(1.8 - 16.6, n=60, last 2 years) -2%
Idle Average *	9.8	7.9 19%	5.9 40%	4.9 50%	11.24 -15%	12.1 -23%	8.5 13%	8.55 ?(3.8 - 63, n=193) 13%	8.16 ?(4.2 - 20.7, n=60, last 2 years) 17%
Idle Maximum *	11.3	8 29%	8.3 27%	9.3 18%	11.48 -2%	12.7 -12%	9.8 13%	10.8 ?(5.8 - 68.9, n=193) 4%	11.1 ?(4.5 - 33.9, n=60, last 2 years) 2%
Load Average *	47.5	31.2 34%	30.1 37%	41.9 12%	12.97 73%	72.3 -52%	48 -1%	45.3 ?(12.5 - 87.3, n=193) 5%	46.2 ?(14.6 - 85, n=60, last 2 years) 3%
Witcher 3 ultra *	36	28.2 22%	30.8 14%	36.4 -1%		77.3 -115%	41.5 -15%
Load Maximum *	68.5	47.6 31%	59 14%	67.5 1%	16.6 76%	103.1 -51%	63 8%	67.5 ?(30.1 - 123.3, n=193) 1%	67 ?(24.9 - 120.8, n=60, last 2 years) 2%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress Test

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø36 (34.5-47.5)

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø59.5 (45.5-68.5)

Power Consumption with an External Monitor

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø67.9 (67.2-68.5)

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø27.1 (20.9-32.8)

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø60 (52.8-68.4)

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø41.2 (39.8-49.5)

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø31.7 (30-42.1)

电池寿命

微软已经将电池容量从51.5Wh减少到47.7Wh，但总体而言，运行时间与旧的 Surface Pro 8。在150cd/m²的亮度下（相当于评测设备上最大亮度的62%）。在视频测试中，几乎可以达到9.5小时，而Wi-Fi测试为7.5小时。我们的Wi-Fi测试在最大亮度下运行的时间刚刚超过5小时。

只要你切换到120赫兹模式，运行时间再次明显下降。我们在下表中列出了三种情况下的数值。因此，在路上时，你应该避免使用120赫兹模式。

	WLAN测试最大亮度	WLAN测试150cd/m²	视频测试
60 Hz	314 分钟	451 分钟	562 分钟
120 Hz	274分钟	369分钟	529分钟

与其竞争对手相比，Surface Pro 9仅领先于华硕ROG Flow Z13游戏机，但所有其他竞争对手提供了更多的耐力。在设备开启的情况下，充满电需要2小时左右，而21分钟后可达到35%，63分钟左右可达到80%。

注：微软的电池寿命要求明显更高，典型使用时间可达15.5小时，但也包括待机模式下的时间。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Edge 109)		7h 31min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 109)		5h 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		9h 22min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 22min

	Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 47.7 Wh	Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U i5-1230U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 49.5 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad X12 20UVS03G00 i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 42 Wh	HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 53 Wh	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 40.88 Wh	Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 56 Wh	Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 51.5 Wh	Average of class Convertible
Battery Runtime		34%	20%	59%	68%	-24%	-2%	37%
H.264	562		597 6%		816 45%	358 -36%	604 7%	773 ?(540 - 1105, n=14, last 2 years) 38%
WiFi v1.3	451	538 19%	492 9%	565 25%	671 49%	338 -25%	456 1%	594 ?(305 - 981, n=61, last 2 years) 32%
Load	82	121 48%	119 45%	158 93%	173 111%	72 -12%	70 -15%	114.9 ?(42 - 219, n=41, last 2 years) 40%
Witcher 3 ultra						47		90 ?(last 2 years)

Pros

+ 高质量的外壳

+ 具有120赫兹模式的良好显示屏

+ 快速的处理器

+ 霹雳4和Wi-Fi 6E

+ 系统性能高

+ 可移动的SSD

+ 可选的键盘盖，集成手写笔

Cons

- 负载下/游戏时机箱温度高

- 电池寿命相对较短

- 3.5毫米音频插孔已被取消

- 英特尔机型不再配备LTE

- 没有SD卡读卡器

结论：Surface Pro 9有更多的力量，但失去了一些功能

从外观上看，新的Surface Pro 9看起来更像是一个带有新处理器的小升级。然而，在细节上，微软做了一些改变，而且不是所有的改变都是积极的。首先，我们应该提到，由于采用了新的Alder Lake-U处理器，CPU性能明显提高。然而，这里仍然浪费了一些潜力，因为在这些TDP值下，带有两个额外性能核心的Alder Lake P芯片会产生更多性能，正如我们的桤木湖-U分析.

微软给Surface Pro 9配备了最新的WLAN模块，支持6GHz网络。同时，英特尔型号的LTE版本已经被放弃，因为以前的Surface Pro X现在也作为Surface Pro 9出售。带Windows的ARM版本是否真的能成为一个完整的替代品，还有待观察。我们本来希望有一个可选的带有LTE或5G的英特尔型号。在这方面，我们也对微软早先决定取消可选的SIM卡插槽的microSD读卡器持批评态度。由于英特尔机型不再有SIM卡槽，因此可以再次安装读卡器。另一方面，被省略的3.5毫米插孔更不显眼，但我们也认为这一决定令人费解。

新的微软Surface Pro 9现在提供了更多的CPU能力，但是可选的WWAN模式被放弃了，音频插孔也被取消了。此外，电池寿命仍然是这款敞篷车的一个弱点。

在其他方面，性能是稳固的，但显示屏尤其需要尽快更新。120赫兹在实践中是非常令人愉快的，但竞争对手的设备通常在色彩空间覆盖和对比度方面提供更多。此外，配备酷睿i7的可折叠机相当昂贵，而配备酷睿i5、8GB内存和256GB SSD存储的基本版本很难满足2023年 "专业 "设备的要求。

我们还将很快对ARM版的Surface Pro 9 + 5G进行评测，我们很想知道现在的Windows是否在ARM SoC上运行得更好，以及它是否代表了对iPad Pro的真正替代。 Apple iPad Pro 12.9.淘宝网戴尔XPS 13 9315提供的CPU功率较小，但通常足以满足日常使用，而且你还能从被动冷却中受益。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

微软Surface Pro 9似乎在所有配置中都有广泛供应，可以直接通过微软的官方在线商店或通过亚马逊等典型供应商。我们的评测配置（酷睿i7，16GB内存，512GB）在美国亚马逊上以US$1.879,99上市。，而在英国亚马逊上的价格为1,799.00英镑.例如，澳大利亚或新加坡的感兴趣的买家可以直接从微软购买，价格从AU$1,649.00开始和SG$1,608.00，分别为1,649.00澳元和1,608.00新加坡元。

上述的例子并不详尽。价格截至2023年1月25日，可能会有变化。

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U - 01/24/2023 v7 ^(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

91 / 98 → 92%

Keyboard

87%

Pointing Device

92%

Connectivity

59 / 75 → 79%

Weight

77 / 20-75 → 100%

Battery

79%

Display

90%

Games Performance

66 / 78 → 84%

Application Performance

90 / 85 → 100%

Temperature

83%

Noise

88%

Audio

81 / 91 → 89%

Camera

63 / 85 → 74%

Average

80%

88%

Convertible - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 1344 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 459232 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 微软Surface Pro 9回顾。可折叠式的，现在有了明显更多的CPU功率

Andreas Osthoff, 2023-01-25 (Update: 2023-01-26)

潜在的竞争对手比较

案例--对敞篷车的微小改动

尺寸比较

设备 - 带有Thunderbolt 4的Surface Pro

沟通

网络摄像头

维护

输入设备 - 签名键盘保持不变

显示器 - 3:2 IPS，120 Hz

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能--Alder Lake-U提供明显更多的动力

测试条件

处理器 - 酷睿i7-1255U

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

系统性能

DPC延时

存储设备

Dauerleistung Lesen: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

排放 - 更快的CPU会导致更多的风扇活动

噪声

温度

发言人

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U audio analysis

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 audio analysis

Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Core i5-1230U audio analysis

电源管理--120赫兹耗费电池寿命

消耗功率

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress Test

Power Consumption with an External Monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论：Surface Pro 9有更多的力量，但失去了一些功能

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison