微星Stealth 16 Studio笔记本电脑回顾：为游戏玩家和创作者提供的极轻、16英寸、Core i7、RTX 4070设备

Name: MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Brand: MSI

完美的全能型选手？

微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG结合了第13代英特尔CPU以及Nvidia RTX 4070笔记本GPU。从视觉角度来看，Stealth 16 Studio非常庄重，这意味着该设备不仅专注于游戏玩家。无论是低调设计的办公室里苛刻的一天，还是晚上玩最新的游戏环节，对这款笔记本电脑来说都不是问题。在我们的评论中，我们看看微星Stealth 16 Studio还能提供什么。

Sebastian Bade, 👁 Christian Hintze (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 07/08/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

MSI Laptop / Notebook Business Gaming Thunderbolt Intel Geforce

新的微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG是基于一个英特尔猛禽湖H处理器和一个当前的Nvidia移动GPU。在细节方面，我们的审查设备有一个英特尔酷睿i7-13700H与一个NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070笔记本GPU.然而，从视觉上看，微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG非常低调，并设法在强大的商务笔记本电脑和游戏笔记本电脑之间踩出一条线。基本上，我们也认为这个设备为创作者形成了一个很好的基础，他们可以看到自己利用微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG的优势，因为其强大的组件和良好的便携性。

然而，从价格上看，微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG发现自己处于高端领域。但是，除了已经提到的组件外，还有32GB的DDR5内存和2TB的SSD存储。同样，我们也不应该忘记16英寸的QHD+显示屏。凭借其240赫兹的刷新率，它的目标直指游戏界。

在这次审查中，微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG将不得不证明自己与当前16英寸笔记本电脑相比。更多细节见下表。

Test device courtesy of MSI Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG (Stealth 16 Studio Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-13700H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 115 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1980 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 105 W TDP, GDDR6, Nvidia 536.23, Optimus

Memory

32 GB

, DDR5-5200

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, AUO26A9, IPS, glossy: no, 240 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Storage

Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH, 2048 GB

, 2TB SSD, 1800 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Raptor Lake-P/U/H PCH - cAVS

Connections

2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader

Networking

Killer E3100G 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 19.95 x 356 x 260

Battery

99.9 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 4-cell

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: IR
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 6-speaker Dynaudio , Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 240-watt PSU, MSI Center, Nahimic 3 Audio Enhancer, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.017 kg, Power Supply: 576 g

Price

3100 EUR

Links

MSI homepage
MSI notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
88.8 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2023	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2 kg	19.95 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
89.7 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2023	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	19.4 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
89 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2023	Medion Erazer Major X20 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	29 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
88.1 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2023	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.7 kg	27.9 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
86.6 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2022	Corsair Voyager a1600 R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	2.4 kg	19.9 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
86.2 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2023	Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	18 mm	16.00"	3840x2400

外壳 - 铝和镁提供坚固性

微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG主要使用高品质材料。铝和镁的混合不仅给设备带来了细腻和良好的稳定性，同时也减轻了其重量。选择性压力的应用只导致底座的最小弯曲，但只有在适度的压力下才会出现。另一方面，机箱盖可以轻微扭曲，尽管这在微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG中似乎不是一个极其消极的方面。铰链做得很好，有助于防止箱盖来回晃动。尽管如此，该设备可以用一只手打开。从设计的角度来看，这台笔记本电脑很低调，没有大量的RGB照明。在后侧，只有 "Stealth "字样被巧妙地照亮。我们的评测设备是蓝色的，但是，另外，微星Stealth 16 Studio也完全是白色的。

当涉及到笔记本电脑的桌面足迹时，这里所有的设备或多或少地占用了相同的空间。相比之下，在重量方面，微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG属于我们比较中最轻的候选者，该设备的重量刚刚超过2公斤。PSU的重量为576克。

尺寸比较

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Medion Erazer Major X20 MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Corsair Voyager a1600 Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF DIN A4 ❌

特点--不乱，并带有Thunderbolt 4功能

不幸的是，微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG并没有配备特别多的端口。然而，所提供的接口应该足够大多数用户在日常情况下使用。至少包括一个带有Power Delivery（PD）的现代Thunderbolt 4端口。但是，用户被限制在只有一个USB-A端口。外部显示器可以通过HDMI或USB-C连接到笔记本电脑，这意味着总共可以同时使用三个显示器。

左侧：局域网（RJ45），HDMI 2.1（4K/120 Hz，8K/60 Hz），微型SD读卡器，USB 3.2 Gen 2 Typ-C

右侧：3.5毫米音频插孔组合，Thunderbold 4（Type-C，Power Delivery），USB 3.2 Gen 2 Typ-A，电源接口

SD卡阅读器

微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG配备了一个读卡器，可以接受microSD存储卡。该读卡器支持快速的UHS-II标准。在我们的测试中，我们使用我们的参考卡，AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60，记录了出色的结果。然而，华硕和技嘉的竞争对手也令人印象深刻，在连续数据方面的得分甚至更好。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	181.2 (133.5^min - 187.53^max) MB/s +15%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	158 (154.8^min - 166.31^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	109.5 (97.05^min - 110.22^max) MB/s -31%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years)	95.5 MB/s -40%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	84.86 MB/s -46%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	80.3 MB/s -49%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	78 MB/s -51%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	257.13 MB/s +42%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	188.81 MB/s +4%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	180.68 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years)	119.3 MB/s -34%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	89.78 MB/s -50%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	88 MB/s -51%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	87.5 MB/s -52%

沟通

基本上，安装的Wi-Fi模块表现得很好。与其竞争对手相比，微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG不能很好地证明自己，尽管我们的评测设备在这里展示的性能方面没有什么可隐藏。为此，我们使用了我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000测试路由器。另外，微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG也提供一个以太网端口。传输速度可以达到2.5GBit/s。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x	1780 (896^min - 1840^max) MBit/s +34%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1679 (1470^min - 1802^max) MBit/s +27%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1407 (1338^min - 1463^max) MBit/s +6%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (942 - 1622, n=26)	1358 MBit/s +2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1325 (977^min - 1480^max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=151, last 2 years)	1235 MBit/s -7%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	920 (471^min - 966^max) MBit/s -31%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1725 (1685^min - 1740^max) MBit/s +26%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1707 (1657^min - 1730^max) MBit/s +25%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (872 - 1714, n=28)	1473 MBit/s +8%
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=151, last 2 years)	1383 MBit/s +1%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1364 (675^min - 1404^max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	905 (451^min - 919^max) MBit/s -34%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x	852 (425^min - 931^max) MBit/s -38%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x	1875 (859^min - 1931^max) MBit/s +16%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1674 (1337^min - 1789^max) MBit/s +4%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1612 (1573^min - 1655^max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1595 (801^min - 1642^max) MBit/s -1%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (1229 - 1693, n=19)	1519 MBit/s -6%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1444 (745^min - 1487^max) MBit/s -10%
Average of class Gaming (648 - 1878, n=72, last 2 years)	1425 MBit/s -12%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1726 (876^min - 1760^max) MBit/s +19%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1628 (1598^min - 1648^max) MBit/s +13%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1611 (805^min - 1631^max) MBit/s +11%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (1327 - 1788, n=20)	1553 MBit/s +7%
Average of class Gaming (853 - 1788, n=72, last 2 years)	1482 MBit/s +2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1446 (731^min - 1469^max) MBit/s
Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x	886 (444^min - 941^max) MBit/s -39%

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1612 (1573-1655)

Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1846 (859-1931)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1421 (731-1469)

Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø871 (444-941)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1325 (977-1480)

Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1750 (896-1840)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1341 (675-1404)

Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø837 (425-931)

网络摄像头

微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG配备了一个FHD网络摄像头，适用于直接的视频通话。由于色彩准确度低，所以扣了几分。

ColorChecker MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG: 10.38 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 15.13 ∆E

安全问题

微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG的集成指纹传感器做得很好，确保系统认证不复杂。

辅料

盒子里除了设备本身外，还有一个240瓦的PSU以及必要的文件资料。

维护

可以对微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG进行维护工作。然而，为了做到这一点，必须拆开由一些螺丝固定的底板。卸下螺丝后，底板仍然牢牢地固定在底座上。然而，利用适当的工具，我们能够拆除底板。尽管如此，建议谨慎行事，以避免损坏。原则上，由于有一个额外的M.2 2280插槽，诸如内存或大容量存储设备等组件可以被替换或扩展。同样，Wi-Fi也不是固定的，也可以被替换或更换。

担保

微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG有24个月的保修期，包括提货和退货服务。

软件 - MSI中心是您的主要办公室

通过微星中心，制造商有一个合适的工具来控制和监测微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG。在测试中，我们使用微星中心没有遇到问题。使用这个工具，用户可以调节笔记本电脑的性能，除其他外，极大地影响了背景噪音的数量。从性能的角度来看，也有明显的差异，由于各种模式下的功率限制不同。

输入设备--熟悉的设计，在日常使用中令人愉快

键盘

在与SteelSeries的合作中，微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG被安装了一个包括数字键盘的6行Chiclet键盘。虽然光滑的按键提供了明显的静音效果，但字体是微星的典型特征。键程非常短，压力点明确。因此，你不应该期望在办公室快速打字时收到愤怒的目光，因为背景噪音非常低。背光可以通过使用组合键改变为三个不同的亮度水平之一。值得注意的是，微星决定不把Fn键放在左手边。然而，使用微星中心，可以通过将Windows键和Fn键的分配调换到右侧来解决这个问题。这样做允许用户选择自己的最佳设置。

触摸板

鼠标的替代品可以在一个具有多点触摸功能的触摸板上找到。它的尺寸为13.1 x 8.2厘米，是一个很好的尺寸。从设计上讲，触摸板与底座的顶部表面完美匹配。这个表面明显比掌托有更光滑的感觉。这导致了最佳的滑行性能。触摸板反应灵敏，非常精确，甚至在边缘处也是如此。触摸板为输入提供了较短的行程，有助于为用户提供一个清晰的压力点和清晰的反馈。

显示 - 240赫兹，用户友好的16:10长宽比

微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG配备了良好的16英寸QHD+面板，其240赫兹的刷新率应该可以满足大多数游戏玩家的愿望。我们测量的平均显示亮度为424cd/m²。这意味着该显示器相对较亮，它甚至能够比许多竞争对手更好。只有Acer Nitro 16 和Asus ROG Flow X16 提供更明亮的显示屏。我们的评测设备不得不与轻微的屏幕出血作斗争，这也是我们在授予显示分数时不得不考虑的问题。相比之下，没有检测到PWM，这可以防止在长时间使用时出现疲劳的迹象。

微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG没有指定其他显示选项，如4K面板。


406 cd/m²	410 cd/m²	397 cd/m²
396 cd/m²	424 cd/m²	403 cd/m²
401 cd/m²	448 cd/m²	413 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AUO26A9 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 448 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 410.9 cd/m² Minimum: 20.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 428 cd/m²
Contrast: 1146:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.04 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.04
ΔE Greyscale 4.34 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.32

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 3)

	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG AUO26A9, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V TMX1603 (TL160ADMP03-0), IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Medion Erazer Major X20 BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 BOE CQ NE16QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Corsair Voyager a1600 BOE0A3B, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Samsung SDC4191 (ATNA60YV09-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16"
Display		0%	-15%	-16%	-16%	6%
Display P3 Coverage	96.4	96.61 0%	69.4 -28%	67.9 -30%	68.7 -29%	99.9 4%
sRGB Coverage	99.7	99.92 0%	98 -2%	99.1 -1%	98.2 -2%	100 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	84.8	84.63 0%	70.9 -16%	69.9 -18%	70.1 -17%	96.4 14%
Response Times		-11%	-114%	-70%	-137%	60%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	4.4 ?(2.2, 2.2)	3.8 ?(1.8, 2) 14%	13.1 ?(6, 7.1) -198%	11 ?(5, 6) -150%	13 ?(7, 6) -195%	2 ?(1, 1) 55%
Response Time Black / White *	5.6 ?(2.2, 3.4)	7.6 ?(4, 3.6) -36%	7.3 ?(3.1, 4.2) -30%	5 ?(2, 3) 11%	10 ?(5, 5) -79%	1.98 ?(0.5, 1.48) 65%
PWM Frequency						60
Screen		21%	16%	25%	6%	144%
Brightness middle	424	486 15%	374 -12%	520 23%	355 -16%	389.97 -8%
Brightness	411	469 14%	357 -13%	494 20%	340 -17%	395 -4%
Brightness Distribution	88	91 3%	92 5%	91 3%	91 3%	97 10%
Black Level *	0.37	0.39 -5%	0.33 11%	0.39 -5%	0.53 -43%	0.03 92%
Contrast	1146	1246 9%	1133 -1%	1333 16%	670 -42%	12999 1034%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.04	2.27 25%	2.43 20%	1.94 36%	2.43 20%	2 34%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.5	5.73 24%	3.97 47%	5.62 25%	4.31 43%	4.1 45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	3.04	0.6 80%	1.4 54%	0.74 76%	1.14 62%	1.68 45%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.34	3.36 23%	3.1 29%	2.94 32%	2.62 40%	2.23 49%
Gamma	2.32 ^95%	2.46 ^89%	2.191 ^100%	2.37 ^93%	2.28 ^96%	2.41 ^91%
CCT	6952 ^93%	6625 ^98%	6194 ^105%	6443 ^101%	6909 ^94%	6323 ^103%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		3% / 12%	-38% / -10%	-20% / 3%	-49% / -19%	70% / 103%

* ... smaller is better

我们的测量显示，sRGB色彩空间的覆盖率良好，几乎达到100%。此外，在P3色彩空间方面，我们看到了一个超过96%的精彩结果，尽管扩展的AdobeRGB色彩空间只能复制到84.8%。通过这些数据，IPS的成绩不错，只输给了Gigabyte AERO 16的OLED面板。尽管如此，这款笔记本电脑可以用于半专业的图像或视频编辑，这是肯定的。

主观上，内置显示屏的图像质量非常好。哑光的表面防止了反射，也没有明显的颗粒感。总之，开箱后，测量的DeltaE-2000色彩值相对接近目标值<3。然而，竞争证明更好是可能的。典型的IPS，我们观察到微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG有轻微但不是很明显的蓝色色调。

我们的手动校准并没有带来任何改善。我们还打算提供该显示器的ICC配置文件。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.2 ms rise
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.2 ms rise
4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

相对较好的显示亮度足以满足户外使用。然而，用户应该优先选择在阴凉处使用。由于显示器的磨砂表面，没有恼人的反射。

在正常使用情况下，内置的IPS面板是一个美妙的显示屏。从四个角落的图像中可以看出，只有从广角和陡峭的角度观察时，才会看到颜色的变化。

性能 - 14个核心的力量 - 英特尔酷睿i7-13700H

微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG，它是基于英特尔酷睿i7-13700H和NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070笔记本GPU，提供了一个水平的力量，意味着它作为一个强大的游戏笔记本电脑得分很高。然而，游戏并不是该设备的唯一主要能力，因为精彩的显示屏和优雅的外观也使其成为创作者的诱人前景。我们的审查模型的替代品可以在微星隐形16工作室A13V的形式找到，它也配备了一个NvidiaGeForce RTX 4060笔记本GPU.

测试条件

各种影响CPU和GPU的性能配置可以通过使用MSI中心来选择。除非另有说明，性能测试是使用极限性能配置文件进行的。此外，我们根据我们的测试标准，进行了能量和体积测量的偏差。

模式	CPU功率 PL1	CPU功率 PL2	GPU功率
超级电池	15 W	15 W	80 W
静音模式	25 W	45 W	80 W
平衡模式	45 W	45 W	80 W
极限性能	115 W	160 W	105 W

处理器

英特尔Core-i7-13700H处理器（Raptor Lake）由八个效率核心（无超线程，1.8至3.7 GHz）和六个性能核心（超线程，2.4至5.0 GHz）组成。总的来说，这导致了20个逻辑上的CPU核心。基于酷睿i7-13700H，微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG实现了良好的性能，领先于我们之前记录的英特尔酷睿i7-13700H的性能。即使是Gigabyte AERO 16 ，它配备的是Intel Core i9-13900H ，也要为我们的审查样本让路。Medion Erazer Major X20是无可争议的领导者。但是，与英特尔酷睿i9-13900HX相比，微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG的性能要低30%左右。

Cinebench R15循环测试显示，在开始时，CPU的提升保持得比较好，但是，在第11次运行后，SoC无法提供其全部动力。与第一次运行相比，我们记录了约15%的性能损失。

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2552 (2375.16-3030.99)

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2665 (2515.25-3099.81)

Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4327 (4285.41-4407.71)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2303 (2287.15-2328.15)

Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS: Ø2152 (2123.71-2170.49)

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2829 (2772.58-2962.96)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	85.6 pt
Average of class Gaming	70.1 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	69.9 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	65 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	61.1 pt
Average Intel Core i7-13700H	57.2 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	51.9 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	50.5 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	27788 Points +39%
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=193, last 2 years)	21651 Points +8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	20034 Points
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	19293 Points -4%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	19188 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (5890 - 20034, n=28)	15266 Points -24%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	14131 Points -29%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	13445 Points -33%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2036 Points +10%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	2016 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming (1088 - 2235, n=191, last 2 years)	1877 Points +1%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	1854 Points
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1323 - 1914, n=28)	1797 Points -3%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	1707 Points -8%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	1554 Points -16%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1546 Points -17%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	10484 Points +37%
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)	8240 Points +7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	7674 Points
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	7491 Points -2%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	7254 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (2322 - 7674, n=28)	5945 Points -23%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5502 Points -28%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	5152 Points -33%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	777 Points +8%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	773 Points +8%
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)	722 Points 0%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	719 Points
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (508 - 741, n=28)	693 Points -4%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	651 Points -9%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	601 Points -16%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	596 Points -17%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	4407.71 Points +54%
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)	3394 Points +19%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	3100 (2515.25^min - 3099.81^max) Points +9%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	2963 (2772.58^min - 2962.96^max) Points +4%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	2854 Points
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (905 - 2982, n=28)	2455 Points -14%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	2328 Points -18%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	2161 Points -24%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	297 Points +9%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	287 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)	276 Points +1%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	273 Points
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (213 - 278, n=28)	260 Points -5%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	247 Points -10%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	245 Points -10%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	243 Points -11%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (169 - 555, n=28)	229 Seconds * -36%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	227 Seconds * -34%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	219 Seconds * -30%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	180 Seconds * -7%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years)	172.1 Seconds * -2%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	172 Seconds * -2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	169 Seconds *
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	113 Seconds * +33%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	113598 MIPS +49%
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years)	84653 MIPS +11%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	76344 MIPS
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	74386 MIPS -3%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	74123 MIPS -3%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	62024 MIPS -19%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	61191 MIPS -20%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (27322 - 76344, n=28)	61025 MIPS -20%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	6895 MIPS +13%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	6285 MIPS +3%
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years)	6281 MIPS +3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	6125 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4825 - 6238, n=28)	5858 MIPS -4%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	5805 MIPS -5%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5584 MIPS -9%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	5570 MIPS -9%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	19213 Points +45%
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years)	14891 Points +12%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	13919 Points +5%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	13796 Points +4%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	13239 Points
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (6165 - 14215, n=28)	11777 Points -11%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	10040 Points -24%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	9683 Points -27%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2033 Points +11%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	1996 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years)	1882 Points +3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	1829 Points
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1362 - 1919, n=28)	1792 Points -2%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	1718 Points -6%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1555 Points -15%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	1481 Points -19%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	28.9 fps +47%
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years)	23.3 fps +18%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	21.4 fps +9%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	21 fps +7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	19.7 fps
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	17.5 fps -11%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	16.8 fps -15%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (6.72 - 21.2, n=28)	16.7 fps -15%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	57.8 s * -6%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	57.2 s * -5%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	54.6 s *
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	53.4 s * +2%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (31.3 - 62.4, n=28)	48.2 s * +12%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years)	47.6 s * +13%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	42.4 s * +22%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	38.1 s * +30%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	0.4958 sec * -10%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	0.4934 sec * -10%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	0.4897 sec * -9%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (0.4308 - 0.607, n=28)	0.4651 sec * -3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	0.4498 sec *
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years)	0.4402 sec * +2%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	0.4165 sec * +7%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.3922 sec * +13%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

10487

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

22842 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

100409 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

15266 Points

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

19835

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

65623

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit

2.92 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit

30.61 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit

154.96 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

3.28 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

33.82 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

164.48 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

273 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2854 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

218.61 fps

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

7674 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

719 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

20034 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1854 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	97.3 pt
Average of class Gaming	82.5 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	75.8 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	71.2 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	70.5 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	69 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	68.1 pt
Average Intel Core i7-13700H	59.6 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	25147 KRay/s +40%
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years)	21640 KRay/s +21%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	18385 KRay/s +3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	17934 KRay/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	17161 KRay/s -4%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	15798 KRay/s -12%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4986 - 18908, n=28)	14011 KRay/s -22%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	13150 KRay/s -27%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	125161 Points +53%
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years)	106090 Points +30%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	105483 Points +29%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	99931 Points +22%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	90834 Points +11%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	86318 Points +6%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	81656 Points
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (25360 - 92359, n=28)	70414 Points -14%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	6234 MB/s +53%
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years)	4852 MB/s +19%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	4245 MB/s +4%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4187 MB/s +3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4080 MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	3492 MB/s -14%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	3410 MB/s -16%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1339 - 4224, n=28)	3272 MB/s -20%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	134141 Points +27%
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years)	116237 Points +10%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	111227 Points +5%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	108729 Points +3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	105597 Points
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	105203 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (68763 - 107159, n=28)	98096 Points -7%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	95175 Points -10%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	15349 Points +39%
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years)	13175 Points +19%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13097 Points +19%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	13039 Points +18%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	11072 Points 0%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	11050 Points
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	10485 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4800 - 11050, n=28)	8871 Points -20%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	62932 Points +43%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	58232 Points +32%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	54778 Points +24%
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years)	53471 Points +21%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	44967 Points +2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	44154 Points
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	42925 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (12321 - 45118, n=28)	34551 Points -22%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	149377 MB/s +83%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	135448 MB/s +66%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	119757 MB/s +47%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years)	109176 MB/s +34%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	83870 MB/s +3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	81504 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (28769 - 151254, n=28)	76444 MB/s -6%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	55915 MB/s -31%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1804 MB/s +75%
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years)	1349 MB/s +31%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	1221 MB/s +18%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1192 MB/s +16%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1032 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (389 - 1215, n=28)	945 MB/s -8%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	906 MB/s -12%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	866 MB/s -16%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13736 KRay/s +42%
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years)	11654 KRay/s +20%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	9803 KRay/s +1%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	9686 KRay/s 0%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	9680 KRay/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	9094 KRay/s -6%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	8438 KRay/s -13%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (2540 - 10135, n=28)	7510 KRay/s -22%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	46114 MPixel/s
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	44611 MPixel/s -3%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	42994 MPixel/s -7%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (12872 - 52727, n=28)	40281 MPixel/s -13%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years)	39919 MPixel/s -13%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	38385 MPixel/s -17%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	29687 MPixel/s -36%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	27554 MPixel/s -40%

系统性能

在系统性能方面，微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG在我们的基准测试中获得了中游的位置。分别为百分之六和百分之九，与第一名的差距相对较小。然而，系统性能很好，在过去两年发布的游戏笔记本中高于平均水平。当涉及到AIDA64基准测试时，微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG由于其快速的DDR5内存，提供了持续无缺陷的结果，我们的评测设备甚至设法确保排名第一。

PCMark 10 / Score
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	8058 Points +10%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	7884 Points +8%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)	7774 Points +6%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	7575 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (7158 - 7956, n=8)	7417 Points +1%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	7329 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7220 Points -1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7208 Points -2%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	11653 Points +11%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	11539 Points +10%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	11332 Points +8%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years)	10836 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10252 - 11449, n=8)	10695 Points +2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10579 Points +1%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	10491 Points
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9970 Points -5%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	10222 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years)	9878 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	9850 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (8501 - 10769, n=8)	9421 Points 0%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	9376 Points
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	9231 Points -2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9146 Points -2%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8983 Points -4%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	13575 Points +25%
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years)	12030 Points +11%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11350 Points +5%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	11272 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10358 - 12908, n=8)	11031 Points +2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	10860 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10558 Points -3%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	10278 Points -5%

CrossMark / Overall
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1956 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=151, last 2 years)	1899 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1768 - 2073, n=6)	1886 Points +5%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1882 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	1842 Points +3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1789 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1535 Points -14%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1415 Points -21%

CrossMark / Productivity
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1859 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=151, last 2 years)	1801 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1645 - 2006, n=6)	1789 Points +5%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1781 Points +4%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1705 Points
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	1700 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1508 Points -12%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1379 Points -19%

CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2157 Points +11%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	2088 Points +8%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=151, last 2 years)	2083 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1936 - 2137, n=6)	2045 Points +6%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1978 Points +2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1936 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1637 Points -15%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1599 Points -17%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1915 Points +17%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1451 - 2202, n=6)	1749 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=151, last 2 years)	1699 Points +4%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1698 Points +4%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1635 Points
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	1608 Points -2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1337 Points -18%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1060 Points -35%

PCMark 10 Score		7329 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	69289 MB/s
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	67755 MB/s -2%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	66344 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years)	64907 MB/s -6%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (24334 - 78081, n=28)	62480 MB/s -10%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	60600 MB/s -13%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	49972 MB/s -28%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	47903 MB/s -31%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	73998 MB/s 0%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	73950 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years)	68658 MB/s -7%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	68252 MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	68205 MB/s -8%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (23681 - 79656, n=28)	65892 MB/s -11%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	51270 MB/s -31%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	50111 MB/s -32%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	71464 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (22986 - 99898, n=28)	68690 MB/s -4%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	68170 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years)	66727 MB/s -7%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	65604 MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	60748 MB/s -15%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	55214 MB/s -23%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	54955 MB/s -23%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	95.2 ns * -9%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	94.4 ns * -8%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (82.4 - 136.8, n=28)	94.1 ns * -7%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years)	94.1 ns * -7%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	93.5 ns * -7%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	92.3 ns * -5%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	90.6 ns * -3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	87.6 ns *

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG的标准化延迟监测测试（上网，4K视频播放，Prime95高负载）返回了极端的数值。未来的软件更新应该有望确保改进，从而使该系统可以被认为完全适合实时视频和音频处理。然而，值得一提的是，在4K视频播放过程中没有发现跳帧。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	18226.8 μs *
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	1752.1 μs * +90%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1312.1 μs * +93%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1210.9 μs * +93%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1053.8 μs * +94%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	773 μs * +96%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储

微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG的大容量存储是以美光的SSD形式出现的。安装的模型为2TB，提供了大量的存储空间，从而支持了它的预期用途。在测试中，由于其PCIe连接，该固态硬盘提供了出色的价值。这再次帮助我们的审查设备获得了第一名。然而，微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG在读取和写入固态硬盘时出现了永久性的问题，仅在短时间的连续负载后，读取性能就明显下降。微星Acer Nitro 16是唯一的其他设备，我们看到类似的性能大幅下降。微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG总共可以容纳两块SSD。

关于更多的比较和基准，，看看我们的比较表。

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH

Sequential Read: 3569 MB/s

Sequential Write: 4893 MB/s

512K Read: 679.3 MB/s

512K Write: 4112 MB/s

4K Read: 74.23 MB/s

4K Write: 249.4 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 682.8 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 619.5 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	87.1 pt
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	82.1 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	79.6 pt
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	76.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	74.9 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	74.5 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	63 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	59.3 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3520 (3490.23^min - 3519.95^max) MB/s +5%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=168, last 2 years)	3487 MB/s +4%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (3347 - 3455, n=3)	3384 MB/s +1%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	3349 (938.07^min - 3349.15^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3234 (3155.56^min - 3234.47^max) MB/s -3%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3207 (3148.45^min - 3206.84^max) MB/s -4%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3153 (2810.23^min - 3153.26^max) MB/s -6%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2519 MB/s -25%
seq write
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	4485 (775.32^min - 4484.81^max) MB/s
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (3655 - 4485, n=3)	3963 MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=168, last 2 years)	3797 MB/s -15%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3377 (3301.76^min - 3376.79^max) MB/s -25%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3291 (3216.4^min - 3290.77^max) MB/s -27%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2997 (2930.15^min - 2996.92^max) MB/s -33%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	2507 MB/s -44%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2220 (2186.31^min - 2219.63^max) MB/s -51%
seq q8 t1 read
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	6966 (5571.08^min - 6965.69^max) MB/s +8%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	6935 (5510.15^min - 6934.86^max) MB/s +7%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6661 (6037.07^min - 6660.97^max) MB/s +3%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (6449 - 6523, n=3)	6477 MB/s 0%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	6460 (6020.84^min - 6459.94^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=168, last 2 years)	6328 MB/s -2%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	6099 (5570.64^min - 6098.73^max) MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4940 MB/s -24%
seq q8 t1 write
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5048 (5040.92^min - 5048.44^max) MB/s +5%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (4803 - 5092, n=3)	4986 MB/s +4%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4926 (4833.5^min - 4926^max) MB/s +3%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=168, last 2 years)	4823 MB/s 0%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	4803 (4344.79^min - 4802.73^max) MB/s
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3723 (3590.69^min - 3723.28^max) MB/s -22%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3185 (3154.12^min - 3184.87^max) MB/s -34%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2216 (2187.96^min - 2215.64^max) MB/s -54%
4k q1 t1 read
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	67.9 (64.79^min - 67.93^max) MB/s
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	66.9 (50.9^min - 66.86^max) MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=168, last 2 years)	65.8 MB/s -3%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (59.1 - 69.5, n=3)	65.5 MB/s -4%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	64.7 (63.36^min - 64.73^max) MB/s -5%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	58.6 (57.33^min - 58.61^max) MB/s -14%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	57.2 (55.31^min - 57.16^max) MB/s -16%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	48.4 (47.92^min - 48.42^max) MB/s -29%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	313 (306.34^min - 313.21^max) MB/s +24%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	275 (272.08^min - 274.75^max) MB/s +9%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	253 (250.9^min - 252.85^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 397, n=168, last 2 years)	222 MB/s -12%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (147.3 - 253, n=3)	203 MB/s -20%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	170.6 (167.61^min - 170.59^max) MB/s -33%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	159.6 (158.36^min - 159.58^max) MB/s -37%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	140.8 (138.42^min - 140.84^max) MB/s -44%
4k q32 t16 read
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3578 (3566.03^min - 3578.13^max) MB/s +19%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3523 (3416.03^min - 3522.69^max) MB/s +17%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3311 (3243.78^min - 3311.19^max) MB/s +10%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	3013 (755.04^min - 3013.06^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=168, last 2 years)	2555 MB/s -15%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (729 - 3013, n=3)	2246 MB/s -25%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1404 (1371.85^min - 1404.22^max) MB/s -53%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	761 (749.41^min - 760.62^max) MB/s -75%
4k q32 t16 write
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3607 (3566.02^min - 3606.71^max) MB/s +32%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3597 (3488.54^min - 3597.4^max) MB/s +31%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2736 (1172^min - 2736.15^max) MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2193 (2174.06^min - 2193.44^max) MB/s -20%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=168, last 2 years)	2101 MB/s -23%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (542 - 2736, n=3)	1984 MB/s -27%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	521 (510.95^min - 520.65^max) MB/s -81%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	497 (485.81^min - 496.85^max) MB/s -82%

AS SSD
Score Total
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	8541 Points +10%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8452 Points +9%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	7774 Points
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=159, last 2 years)	6737 Points -13%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (5068 - 7774, n=3)	6563 Points -16%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5878 Points -24%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	5636 Points -28%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4607 Points -41%
Score Read
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3332 Points +13%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3174 Points +7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2959 Points
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=159, last 2 years)	2441 Points -18%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (1517 - 2959, n=3)	2399 Points -19%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1824 Points -38%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1805 Points -39%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1443 Points -51%
Score Write
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3723 Points +12%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3583 Points +8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	3331 Points
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3221 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=159, last 2 years)	3113 Points -7%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3012 Points -10%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (2686 - 3331, n=3)	2999 Points -10%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2498 Points -25%
Seq Read
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5185.49 MB/s +1%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	5126 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=159, last 2 years)	4944 MB/s -4%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4821 MB/s -6%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	4774.16 MB/s -7%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4582 MB/s -11%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (2272 - 5126, n=3)	4078 MB/s -20%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4068 MB/s -21%
Seq Write
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	4546 MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3900.46 MB/s -14%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=159, last 2 years)	3720 MB/s -18%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3289.95 MB/s -28%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (462 - 4546, n=3)	2766 MB/s -39%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2725 MB/s -40%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2347 MB/s -48%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2310 MB/s -49%
4K Read
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	69.95 MB/s +3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	67.7 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=159, last 2 years)	65.1 MB/s -4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	62.76 MB/s -7%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (55.9 - 67.7, n=3)	62.5 MB/s -8%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	61.3 MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	61.3 MB/s -9%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	49.75 MB/s -27%
4K Write
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	288 MB/s +39%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	244 MB/s +18%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=159, last 2 years)	211 MB/s +2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	207 MB/s
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (188.6 - 207, n=3)	197.7 MB/s -4%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	168.39 MB/s -19%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	141.54 MB/s -32%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	137.9 MB/s -33%
4K-64 Read
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	2784.37 MB/s +17%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2593.07 MB/s +9%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2378 MB/s
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (969 - 2439, n=3)	1929 MB/s -19%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=159, last 2 years)	1876 MB/s -21%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1292.41 MB/s -46%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1285 MB/s -46%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	974 MB/s -59%
4K-64 Write
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3195.33 MB/s +20%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3085.54 MB/s +16%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2807.18 MB/s +5%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2669 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=159, last 2 years)	2533 MB/s -5%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (2168 - 2736, n=3)	2524 MB/s -5%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2493 MB/s -7%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2020 MB/s -24%
Access Time Read
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.079 ms * -193%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.078 ms * -189%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	0.078 ms * -189%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.066 ms * -144%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=158, last 2 years)	0.05509 ms * -104%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	0.041 ms * -52%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (0.022 - 0.034, n=3)	0.02767 ms * -2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	0.027 ms *
Access Time Write
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=159, last 2 years)	0.04843 ms * -142%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.029 ms * -45%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.029 ms * -45%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	0.023 ms * -15%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (0.02 - 0.023, n=3)	0.021 ms * -5%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	0.02 ms *
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.016 ms * +20%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	0.013 ms * +35%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH: Ø1946 (1623.72-6448.85)

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00: Ø4968 (4645.97-4987.24)

Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R: Ø6907 (6078.6-6965.9)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø3831 (253.34-6627.38)

Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB: Ø6086 (5628.61-6111.88)

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10: Ø6590 (6239.87-6954.51)

图形卡

Das MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG依靠的是一个NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070笔记本GPU它有一个可用的TGP高达105瓦。这意味着该显卡没有被授予最大可能的TGP，即高达115瓦。然而，在我们的比较中，我们看到我们的审查样本在合成测试中提供了良好的3D性能，其3DMark性能评级几乎足以确保第一名。

其他NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070笔记本GPU的基准测试可以发现这里.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	96 pt
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	95 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	94.7 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	93.4 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	91.9 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	90.5 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	85.1 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	84.9 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)	43521 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	42773 Points +4%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	41480 Points 0%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	41302 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	40995 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (24229 - 46434, n=59)	40410 Points -2%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	39075 Points -5%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	35540 Points -14%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	170020 Points +4%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	163483 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	157673 Points -4%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	157044 Points -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (54238 - 193851, n=24)	148053 Points -9%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	147464 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)	142796 Points -13%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	105600 Points -35%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)	31245 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	30809 Points +3%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	30507 Points +2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	30051 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	29853 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (12242 - 33451, n=62)	29041 Points -3%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	28885 Points -4%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	26801 Points -11%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)	13034 Points +9%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	12551 Points +5%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	11955 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	11868 Points -1%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	11798 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (5012 - 13391, n=60)	11603 Points -3%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	10439 Points -13%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	10402 Points -13%

3DMark 05 Standard		53254 points
3DMark 06 Standard Score		63808 points
3DMark Vantage P Result		94245 points
3DMark 11 Performance		34960 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		94921 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		63781 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		26244 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		13736 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		11980 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender
v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ()	330 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (63 - 399, n=10, last 2 years)	247 Seconds *
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	63 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	24 Seconds *
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	22 Seconds * +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (18 - 30, n=60)	21.5 Seconds * +10%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	21 Seconds * +12%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	21 Seconds * +12%
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=177, last 2 years)	21 Seconds * +12%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	19 Seconds * +21%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	42 Seconds * -17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (32 - 181, n=63)	40.6 Seconds * -13%
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years)	36.7 Seconds * -2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	36 Seconds *
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	35 Seconds * +3%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	34 Seconds * +6%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	33 Seconds * +8%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	382 Seconds * -28%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	364 Seconds * -22%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	323 Seconds * -8%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	304 Seconds * -2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	299 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=191, last 2 years)	297 Seconds * +1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (158 - 440, n=59)	290 Seconds * +3%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	202 Seconds * +32%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

的 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070笔记本GPU这里采用的是足够快的速度，能够流畅地播放众多游戏，并以原生革命显示它们。我们的测试表明，美迪恩Erazer Major X20以相同的图形适配器提供更好的图形性能。与技嘉AERO 16相比，微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG显示了几乎相同的性能水平。除此之外，我们还注意到，宏碁的Nitro 16，它也配备了NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070笔记本GPU，显然要差一些。然而，我们不希望被剥夺Ada Lovelace架构的好处，该架构也在移动GPU中。这意味着你可以使用DLSS 3和帧生成等功能，只要游戏本身支持这项技术。这有时会导致帧率的显著增加。

Performance Rating - Percent
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	98.6 pt
Average of class Gaming	94.9 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	93.3 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	93.1 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	88.1 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	79.3 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	73.1 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	127 (107^min) fps +7%
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)	126.9 fps +7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	119 fps
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	116 (48.5^P0.1, 82.5^P1) fps -3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	113.2 (98^min) fps -5%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	108 (38^min, 58.3^P0.1, 88.2^P1) fps -9%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	106.5 (35.5^P0.1, 82.1^P1) fps -11%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	128 (5.76^min, 90.9^P1) fps +7%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	123.2 (3.96^min, 76.9^P1) fps +3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	119.7 (4.54^min, 76.9^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years)	113 fps -6%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	110.3 (3.88^min, 71.4^P1) fps -8%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	97.4 (36.1^min, 71.4^P1) fps -19%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	92.8 (6.46^min, 55.6^P1) fps -22%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	121.2 fps +5%
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=184, last 2 years)	119 fps +3%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	116.2 fps +1%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	115 fps
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	109.1 fps -5%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	100.8 fps -12%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	97.5 fps -15%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=182, last 2 years)	227 fps +14%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	208 (11.2^min, 156.4^P1) fps +4%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	206 (116.9^min, 151.5^P1) fps +3%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	204 (39^min, 153.9^P1) fps +2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	200 (31.2^min, 147.4^P1) fps
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	192.6 (25.1^min, 144.3^P1) fps -4%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	192.5 (23.6^min, 138.1^P1) fps -4%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	158.8 (136.2^min) fps +3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	154.7 (131.1^min) fps
Average of class Gaming (30.8 - 220, n=190, last 2 years)	149.3 fps -3%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	149.2 (118.7^min) fps -4%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	144.5 (123.6^min) fps -7%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	114.8 (94.7^min) fps -26%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	114.8 (97.8^min) fps -26%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	120.8 fps +10%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	116.4 fps +6%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	115.3 fps +5%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	110.2 fps
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=196, last 2 years)	107.2 fps -3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	76.3 fps -31%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	45.3 fps -59%

The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	545 (433^min) fps +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (314 - 617, n=24)	462 fps +2%
Average of class Gaming (108.2 - 718, n=99, last 2 years)	453 fps 0%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	452.3 fps
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	322.5 (274^min) fps -29%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	309 (29.3^min, 92.9^P0.1, 225^P1) fps -32%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	391.4 (347^min) fps 0%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	390.5 fps
Average of class Gaming (168.5 - 617, n=102, last 2 years)	361 fps -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (123.3 - 449, n=25)	347 fps -11%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	236 (13.7^min, 152^P0.1, 192^P1) fps -40%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	242.3 (215^min) fps +7%
Average of class Gaming (35.6 - 449, n=125, last 2 years)	238 fps +5%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	236 fps +4%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	226.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (123.9 - 268, n=39)	226 fps 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	214.8 (42.1^P0.1, 109.7^P1) fps -5%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	213.3 (182^min) fps -6%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	177.8 (43.6^min, 105.5^P0.1, 142.7^P1) fps -22%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	127 (107^min) fps +7%
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)	126.9 fps +7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	119 fps
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	116 (48.5^P0.1, 82.5^P1) fps -3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	113.2 (98^min) fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (69.8 - 133.7, n=55)	112.2 fps -6%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	108 (38^min, 58.3^P0.1, 88.2^P1) fps -9%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	106.5 (35.5^P0.1, 82.1^P1) fps -11%

为了检查帧率在较长时间内的稳定性，我们在全高清分辨率和最大预设下运行了游戏TheWitcher 3 约60分钟。在这个过程中，游戏角色没有被移动。图中显示了相对稳定的帧率性能。

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

Medion Erazer Major X20 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; FPS: Ø123.2 (117-126)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø117.1 (108-122)

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø94.4 (90-99)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø111.1 (107-116)

Corsair Voyager a1600 R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M: Ø112.7 (97.284-143.2)

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø113.3 (107-120)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)	187	184.7	180.3	119.7	92.8
The Witcher 3 (2015)	452.3	390.5	226.7	119
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	189.6	169	160.5	154.7
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	202	154.2	115		83.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	158.5	142.4	110.2
Far Cry 5 (2018)	190	157	150	143	113
Strange Brigade (2018)	470	286	230	200	132
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	206	163.4	158.1	145.9	104
Far Cry New Dawn (2019)	165	140	135	120	105
Metro Exodus (2019)	221	141.3	109.8	87.2	69.1
Borderlands 3 (2019)	175.9	145.9	119.7	98.6	71.5
F1 2020 (2020)	331	276	235	183	142.6
F1 2021 (2021)	378	300	238	139.5	108.5
Far Cry 6 (2021)	168.8	143	126.5	114.5	86.7
God of War (2022)	143.1	119.5	95.6	68.8	58.5
GRID Legends (2022)	182.9	164.1	150.1	131.7	112.1
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)	230	190.1	130.3	101.7	70.5
F1 22 (2022)	256	246	183.4	76.7	49.7
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection (2022)	94	92.4	86.2	82.7	61.2
High On Life (2023)	220	178.7	134.1	110.6	66.9
Dead Space Remake (2023)	102.8	98.2	86.7	86.5	56.5
Returnal (2023)	115	111	102	88	63
Company of Heroes 3 (2023)	211.8	191.4	156.5	153.9	114.8
Resident Evil 4 Remake (2023)	160.1	123.4	113.1	82.4	61.3
The Last of Us (2023)	114.4	96.5	85.5	75	43.9
Star Wars Jedi Survivor (2023)	92.1	80.6	75.6	71.1	47
Diablo 4 (2023)	255	233	208	177.8	105.4
F1 23 (2023)	230	232	189	71	45

排放 - 电池寿命好，但温度高

噪声排放

当空转和在日常办公中使用Office和执行基于互联网的任务时，微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG是无声的。我们只测量了在平均负载下的35分贝（A），可以听到安静但可闻的呼呼声。在负载下，它可以变得非常嘈杂，压力测试的最大值为51.5分贝（A）。在62分贝(A)，宏碁Nitro 16 AN16-41表明有可能得到明显的噪音。
基本上，微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG也允许几乎无声运行。为了实现这一点，你必须选择 "静音 "或 "超级电池 "模式的能源配置文件，这两种模式可以在微星中心选择。
你也可以通过微星中心控制风扇。除了预定义的配置文件之外，您还可以创建自己的风扇曲线。

Noise Level

Idle		24 / 24 / 24 dB(A)
Load		34.81 / 51.57 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A)

	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
Noise		-3%	-18%	-8%	-23%	-15%
off / environment *	24	24 -0%	24 -0%	25.7 -7%	29.9 -25%	23 4%
Idle Minimum *	24	24 -0%	25 -4%	25.7 -7%	30.5 -27%	23 4%
Idle Average *	24	24 -0%	29 -21%	25.7 -7%	30.6 -28%	23 4%
Idle Maximum *	24	24 -0%	31 -29%	26.3 -10%	30.7 -28%	33.64 -40%
Load Average *	34.81	36.71 -5%	50 -44%	33.9 3%	44.5 -28%	51.49 -48%
Witcher 3 ultra *	44.05	50.92 -16%	53 -20%			55.27 -25%
Load Maximum *	51.57	50.92 1%	57 -11%	62 -20%	51.1 1%	55.24 -7%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在压力测试中，我们记录了负载下和游戏时的高机箱温度。在超过60℃的情况下，笔记本顶部和底部的温度都比同行要高。因此，在负载情况下将设备放在腿上使用时，会让人感到不舒服。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


52 °C	60 °C	54 °C
40 °C	45 °C	43 °C
34 °C	32 °C	36 °C

Maximum: 60 °C
Average: 44 °C


54 °C	61 °C	55 °C
42 °C	50 °C	39 °C
34 °C	35 °C	34 °C

Maximum: 61 °C
Average: 44.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 52 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


36.9 °C	38.2 °C	36.9 °C
32.3 °C	34.5 °C	33 °C
29.4 °C	28.3 °C	29.5 °C

Maximum: 38.2 °C
Average: 33.2 °C


36.6 °C	37.7 °C	36.4 °C
33.1 °C	33.7 °C	33.3 °C
31.2 °C	31.3 °C	31.3 °C

Maximum: 37.7 °C
Average: 33.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.8 °C | Room Temperature 22.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated)

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


54 °C	59 °C	54 °C
41 °C	46 °C	43 °C
35 °C	34 °C	36 °C

Maximum: 59 °C
Average: 44.7 °C


58 °C	64 °C	54 °C
42 °C	49 °C	42 °C
35 °C	35 °C	34 °C

Maximum: 64 °C
Average: 45.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 46 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 60 °C / 140 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 61 °C / 142 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36 °C / 96.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-7.1 °C / -12.8 F).

	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Heat		19%	11%	18%	11%	34%
Maximum Upper Side *	60	46 23%	46 23%	41.5 31%	50.7 15%	41 32%
Maximum Bottom *	61	41 33%	49 20%	51.8 15%	54.2 11%	47 23%
Idle Upper Side *	38.2	36 6%	37 3%	31.6 17%	35.8 6%	23 40%
Idle Bottom *	37.7	33 12%	38 -1%	34.5 8%	33 12%	23 39%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

我们使用Prime95和FurMark连续运行来模拟压力测试。它代表了一种极端情况，用于检查系统在全负荷下的稳定性。就处理器而言，我们观察到的最高值是97℃，是在一开始就达到的。随着时间的推移，CPU温度稳定在87℃左右。当涉及到图形适配器时，我们记录的最大热点值高达91℃。在平均80°C左右，我们看到负载下的温度大大降低。这意味着没有达到显卡的散热极限（87℃）。

发言人

微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG的声音系统基于六个扬声器，产生良好的音频体验。在最大音量下的播放是清晰和无干扰的，但不能取代外部系统。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.48 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.38 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理--更大的电池和适度的能源需求

消耗功率

微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG在功耗方面没有显示任何异常。在空闲状态下的记录值实际上是非常好的，尽管竞争者有时能够提供更好的结果。然而，最低限度的高耗能是非常低的。在负载情况下，我们观察到与这种基本硬件有关的正常数值。在240瓦的情况下，PSU的尺寸很好，并没有被最大228瓦的功率所淹没。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.08 / 0.09 Watt
Idle	11 / 18 / 19 Watt
Load	91 / 228 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Medion Erazer Major X20 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Corsair Voyager a1600 R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, OLED, 3840x2400, 16"	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		3%	-25%	-10%	-38%	-0%	-7%	-19%
Idle Minimum *	11	9.6 13%	12 -9%	11.6 -5%	16.9 -54%	11.8 -7%	12.1 ?(4.3 - 31, n=50) -10%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=157, last 2 years) -23%
Idle Average *	18	16 11%	16 11%	15.6 13%	20.3 -13%	16.1 11%	17.1 ?(4.6 - 34.1, n=50) 5%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=157, last 2 years) -5%
Idle Maximum *	19	16.9 11%	26 -37%	16.5 13%	22.2 -17%	17 11%	23.9 ?(9 - 55.4, n=50) -26%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=157, last 2 years) -41%
Load Average *	91	104 -14%	115 -26%	155 -70%	133.4 -47%	100.6 -11%	97.9 ?(59.2 - 178, n=50) -8%	106.6 ?(32.1 - 201, n=155, last 2 years) -17%
Witcher 3 ultra *	130	142 -9%	191.6 -47%	154.8 -19%	206 -58%	158 -22%
Load Maximum *	228	214 6%	319 -40%	205 10%		192 16%	222 ?(107 - 319, n=50) 3%	249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=157, last 2 years) -9%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø130.5 (121.03-169.72)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø161.8 (125.12-227.94)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø15.2 (11.647-28.773)

Power consumption with an external monitor

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø149.4 (123.76-166.66)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø165.8 (154.41-180.92)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø136.6 (74.35-163.41)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø137.2 (132.68-161.38)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø127.3 (110.58-147.31)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø19.1 (12.526-45.704)

电池寿命

Das MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG有一个99Wh的电池，这是一个笔记本电脑可以采取的最大尺寸。由于它的容量，我们的审查样本管理7小时46分钟和7小时42分钟，分别在我们的Wi-Fi测试循环（使用脚本加载一个网站）和视频测试大巴克兔短片（H.264编码，FHD）。这意味着微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG对于一台游戏笔记本来说管理着出色的电池寿命。在这两项测试中，显示亮度被设置为150cd/m²。在我们的案例中，这意味着将亮度降低到37%。

充满电几乎正好需要三个小时。然而，在大约一半的时间后，电池被充电到70%。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		11h 01min
WiFi Websurfing		7h 46min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		7h 42min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 22min

	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Medion Erazer Major X20 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 62.3 Wh	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Corsair Voyager a1600 R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M, 99 Wh	Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 88 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-7%	-44%	8%	-24%	-6%	-22%
Reader / Idle	661		345 -48%	729 10%	418 -37%		565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years) -15%
H.264	462	532 15%	252 -45%	614 33%	358 -23%	442 -4%	408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years) -12%
WiFi v1.3	466	474 2%	232 -50%	540 16%	350 -25%	448 -4%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years) -19%
Load	142	89 -37%	96 -32%	105 -26%	126 -11%	126 -11%	85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years) -40%

Pros

+ 优质的材料选择

+ 低重量

+ 240赫兹的QHD+显示屏

+ 高色彩空间覆盖率

+ 带电源传输的Thunderbolt 4

+ 现代Wi-Fi

+ 电池寿命长

+ 性能降低时也很安静

+ 优秀的6扬声器音响系统

+ 快速存储卡读卡器

+ 2TB固态硬盘

+ 32GB的DDR5内存

+ 指纹识别器

Cons

- 负载下声音大

- 机箱温度高

- 没有稳定的SSD性能

- 非常高的DPC延迟

- 价格高

结论 - 创作者的高级笔记本电脑

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

就其内置的CPU和GPU而言，微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG是一款贯穿始终的游戏笔记本电脑。纯粹从视觉角度来看，微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG是一款具有游戏野心的有品位的商务笔记本电脑。这样一来，该设备涵盖了广泛的需求，以吸引许多用户。这款笔记本电脑的目标是那些依赖高水平系统性能的创造者。英特尔酷睿i7-13700H与Nvidia-GeForce RTX 4070笔记本GPU相结合的性能一直很好。显示屏也要满足必要的要求，这一点它通过高色彩空间覆盖率来实现。

其余的规格也给我们留下了深刻的印象--32GB的DDR5内存和总共2TB的固态硬盘存储是一个很好的基础，这确保了笔记本电脑不会很快需要升级。16英寸显示屏提供QHD+分辨率，16:10的长宽比和240赫兹的刷新率证明了它的游戏资质。

微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG同时是一个非常强大和非常轻的笔记本电脑，适合内容创作者和游戏者。

另一方面，声音的限制来自于音量的形式，然而，这对于游戏笔记本来说是典型的。我们对端口的选择也持批评态度，因为只有一个USB-A端口对于这类设备来说根本不够用。然而，有一个现代的Thunderbolt 4端口，使笔记本电脑可以有效地扩展。读卡器的实现很好，从性能上讲，它没有理由隐藏。

说到移动性，微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG是一个很好的数字，因为它的低重量和良好的电池寿命都高于平均水平。许多设置可以通过微星中心进行，在正确的设置下，该设备甚至可以几乎无声地运行。

然而，在定价方面，微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG目前的要价约为2549美元，让人很难接受。对于一个更便宜的替代品，值得一看的是 Medion Erazer Major X20，它配备了一个NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070笔记本GPU并提供出色的性能。

价格和可用性

配备1TB固态硬盘和64GB内存的微星Stealth 16 Studio A13VG目前在BestBuy售价为2549.99美元。

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG - 11/28/2023 v7 ^(old)
Sebastian Bade

Chassis

86 / 98 → 88%

Keyboard

81%

Pointing Device

83%

Connectivity

69 / 80 → 86%

Weight

63 / 10-66 → 94%

Battery

76 / 95 → 80%

Display

89%

Games Performance

99%

Application Performance

92%

Workstation

85%

Temperature

69 / 95 → 73%

Noise

87 / 90 → 97%

Audio

89%

Camera

44 / 85 → 52%

Average

79%

89%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andrew Dickson - Translator - 114 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 460014 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 微星Stealth 16 Studio笔记本电脑回顾：为游戏玩家和创作者提供的极轻、16英寸、Core i7、RTX 4070设备

Sebastian Bade, 2023-07- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 8)

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - 铝和镁提供坚固性

尺寸比较

特点--不乱，并带有Thunderbolt 4功能

SD卡阅读器

沟通

网络摄像头

安全问题

辅料

维护

担保

软件 - MSI中心是您的主要办公室

输入设备--熟悉的设计，在日常使用中令人愉快

键盘

触摸板

显示 - 240赫兹，用户友好的16:10长宽比

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - 14个核心的力量 - 英特尔酷睿i7-13700H

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

系统性能

DPC延迟

大容量存储

Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

排放 - 电池寿命好，但温度高

噪声排放

温度

压力测试

发言人

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG audio analysis

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V audio analysis

能源管理--更大的电池和适度的能源需求

消耗功率

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Power consumption with an external monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 - 创作者的高级笔记本电脑

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison