微软Surface Laptop Studio评论。有趣的概念与缓慢的英特尔CPU
Surface Laptop Studio是微软的一个全新设计,是对普通Surface Laptop的补充。笔记本电脑笔记本(13和15英寸)的可拆卸显示单元已经停产,新的Surface Laptop Studio的14.4英寸屏幕几乎是替代产品。显示屏不再是可拆卸的,但由于新的铰链,它可以向前倾斜或作为平板电脑使用。
微软使用英特尔的Tiger Lake-H35处理器,因此它们仍然是四核处理器,集成了Iris Xe Graphics G7。酷睿i5-11300H SKU的价格从1699欧元开始,配备16GB内存和256GB SSD存储。如果你需要更多的GPU能力,你可以得到一个版本的Core i7-11370H和专用的GeForce RTX 3050 Ti的版本,其起价为2199欧元。我们的评测单位是高端机型,配备i7/RTX 3050 Ti,32GB内存以及1TB SSD存储,价格为2799欧元。所有型号都有相同的14.4英寸IPS屏幕,长宽比为3:2,提供2400 x 1600像素的高分辨率以及120 Hz的刷新率。Surface Slim Pen 2不是包装的一部分,必须单独购买,价格为130欧元。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 19 mm | 14.40" | 2400x1600 | |
87.4 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2021 | Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | 1.8 kg | 23.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
92.7 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU | 1.6 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.20" | 3024x1964 | |
86.9 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2020 | Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 1.6 kg | 23 mm | 13.50" | 3000x2000 | |
87.7 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2022 | SCHENKER Vision 14 i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.1 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
87.5 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2021 | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 16.8 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1440 | |
82.3 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | MSI Summit E14 A11SCS i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | 1.3 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 3840x2160 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - 带有可折叠显示屏的Surface Laptop Studio
我们已经 报道了关于一个新的折叠机制专利与潜在的Surface Book 4相结合。我们现在知道,微软将这种铰链用于新的Surface Laptop Studio。该设备基本上是一个普通的笔记本电脑,在屏幕的中间有一个额外的铰链。这意味着你可以在两个位置上将屏幕向前倾斜,一个位置在键盘前面(似乎是用磁铁固定),或者你可以把它放到键盘上,把Surface Laptop Studio作为平板电脑使用。我们已经熟悉了这个概念,从Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel我们已经从宏碁ConceptD 3 Ezel中熟悉了这个概念,在那里,带有额外铰链的机制虽然有点笨重。
中间 "位置可用于观看视频或用游戏板玩游戏。显然,你也可以使用触摸屏进行输入,或者使用可选的笔,但这种情况下的隐藏式键盘肯定不理想,而且你无法使用音量或亮度控制。
铰链机制本身给人留下了坚实的印象,并不显得摇晃或脆弱,但问题是随着时间的推移,特别是考虑到电缆,它将如何经受住考验。微软宣传说,电缆可以折叠180度。显示器后面的下半部分由布覆盖,感觉很精致。常规的显示屏铰链也调整得很好,但当你调整屏幕的开启角度时,会有一些反弹,最大的开启角度被限制在135度。
这种不寻常的设计延续到基本单元,它由两层组成。下层部分和上层部分,上层部分四面都比较宽。我们熟悉其他制造商的这种基本方法,具有锥形设计的设备看起来比实际情况更苗条,但过渡通常更平滑,不像Surface Laptop Studio那样有角度。抬起设备非常容易,但设计本身(按照惯例)绝对是一个品味问题。对于现代设备来说,屏幕边框相对较宽,约为10毫米(屏幕与机身比例:84%)。
微软的Surface设备总是有很好的制造质量,新的Surface Laptop Studio也不例外。制造质量无懈可击,由铝和镁制成的机箱的亚光表面触感很好,而且也不太容易沾染灰尘。我们对评测单位的稳定性也完全满意。
新的设计方法导致了一个相当大的机箱,Surface Laptop Studio是最大的设备之一,超过1.8公斤,也是对比组中最重的设备之一。102W电源适配器的重量为379克。如果你选择没有GeForce dGPU的Core i5 SKU,你会得到一个更紧凑的65W电源适配器(309克)。
连接性 - Thunderbolt 4和Surface Connect
微软仍然使用自己的Surface Connect端口,并提供一些相应的配件,如对接站。不过,连接器本身仍然不理想。得益于笔直的侧壁,与Surface Laptop等有角度的侧壁相比,更容易连接连接器,但电缆会根据不同的方向挡住3.5毫米立体声插孔。你还得到两个支持Thunderbolt 4的USB-C端口,所以它们也可以用于第三方扩展坞。你没有得到任何其他端口,如普通的USB-A或SD卡阅读器。
沟通
通信模块仅限于基本要求,因为来自英特尔的AX200模块支持Wi-Fi 6(802.11ax)和蓝牙5.1,但已经存在两年多了,而且已经有更现代的型号,如AX210E。然而,在我们用Netgear的参考路由器(Nighthawk AX12)进行测试时,信号质量和传输速率都非常好,在实践中也没有任何限制。没有LTE或5G调制解调器的选项。
网络摄像头
微软使用了一个1080p的网络摄像头,在良好的照明条件下画质还可以,但制造商在Surface Pro和Surface Go型号中提供了更好的模块。除了网络摄像头外,还有一个红外线摄像头,支持通过Windows Hello进行面部识别。
辅料
我们已经提到,Surface Slim Pen 2必须单独购买,价格为130欧元。它可以存放在底座下面的前面,也可以在那里充电。微软还提供其他配件,如输入设备或扩展坞。
维护
新的Surface Laptop Studio没有提供任何维修选项。微软说M.2-SSD可以被替换,你也可以在微软下面的新闻图片中认出M.2-2280插槽,但没有可见的螺丝,用户无法接触到内部结构。官方技术规格还指出,用户不得更换固态硬盘(只能由授权技术人员更换)。你甚至不能清洗风扇。
输入设备 - 微软使用Force Touchpad
键盘
看一下键盘,就会发现与以前的型号相比有区别,因为现在的按键颜色是深灰色调,不再是底座的颜色了。另一方面,良好的机制并没有改变,打字体验非常舒适。由于足够的键程和精确的击键,输入较长的文本没有问题,而且三段式白色照明在较暗的环境中也有帮助。
触摸板和触摸屏
微软效仿Apple,为Surface Laptop Studio配备了一个强制触摸板(我们没有找到微软的任何官方说法),所以你不能用物理方式按压该触摸板。触觉反馈是由一个振动马达产生的,这使得整个触摸板表面(12 x 8厘米)的反馈均匀,光标控制工作良好。我们只在待机后遇到了一些问题,即触摸板似乎过于敏感。然而,我们只注意到两次,一些驱动优化应该可以解决这个问题。
电容式触摸屏的工作情况与预期的一样好。微软宣传支持与Surface Slim Pen 2结合使用的触觉反馈,但我们没有笔来测试它。
显示屏 - 像素感应与120赫兹
Surface Laptop Studio的显示屏采用14.4英寸IPS面板,分辨率为2400 x 1600像素,长宽比为3:2。边框和机箱的其他部分一样是圆形的,所以显示器角落里的内容被稍微切断了。它并没有真正隐藏任何内容,但在实践中你会注意到它。主观的图片印象非常好,这也是超过1700:1的高对比度的结果。我们确定平均亮度为近500尼特,黑值为0.29cd/m²,很不错。
在高亮度水平下,你可以看到在黑暗背景下的侧边有背光渗出,但在日常场景中它们是没有问题的。我们可以在98%或更低的亮度水平上检测到PWM闪烁,但频率非常高,为5 kHz,大多数用户应该不会注意到任何问题。响应时间不是最快的,例如,当你移动光标时有明显的重影效果。120赫兹的刷新率不能解决这个问题,主要是在你滚动浏览文件或网站时创造一个更平滑的画面印象。由于有环境光传感器,显示器亮度可以自动调整,也支持杜比视界内容,但由于HDR能力有限,与好的电视相比,效果要小得多。
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 496 cd/m²
Contrast: 1714:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.8
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
78.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
80.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.14
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti LQ144P1JX01, IPS, 2400x1600, 14.4" | Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 B140HAN06.D, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2" | Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 Panasonic MEI96A2, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.5" | SCHENKER Vision 14 MNE007ZA1, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 TL140BDXP02-2, IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | MSI Summit E14 A11SCS AU Optronics AUO123B, IPS, 3840x2160, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -10% | 23% | -14% | -5% | 10% | 12% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 80.6 | 67.2 -17% | 99.3 23% | 63.5 -21% | 74.3 -8% | 97.2 21% | 87.5 9% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 98.2 -2% | 95.1 -5% | 97.6 -2% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 78.5 | 68.7 -12% | 65.7 -16% | 75.7 -4% | 85.4 9% | 99.4 27% | |
Response Times | 22% | 43% | -28% | 27% | 64% | -9% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 58.4 ? | 43 ? 26% | 58.4 ? -0% | 57 ? 2% | 40.4 ? 31% | 16.4 ? 72% | 52 ? 11% |
Response Time Black / White * | 24 ? | 20 ? 17% | 40.4 ? -68% | 38 ? -58% | 18.4 ? 23% | 10.8 ? 55% | 30.8 ? -28% |
PWM Frequency | 5000 ? | 14880 198% | |||||
Screen | 1% | 372% | -45% | -43% | -35% | -113% | |
Brightness middle | 497 | 367 -26% | 489 -2% | 391 -21% | 407 -18% | 331.1 -33% | 593.3 19% |
Brightness | 491 | 354 -28% | 479 -2% | 367 -25% | 407 -17% | 318 -35% | 571 16% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 83 -10% | 94 2% | 86 -7% | 94 2% | 91 -1% | 87 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.19 34% | 0.01 97% | 0.19 34% | 0.25 14% | 0.36 -24% | 0.53 -83% |
Contrast | 1714 | 1932 13% | 48900 2753% | 2058 20% | 1628 -5% | 920 -46% | 1119 -35% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 1.09 9% | 0.8 33% | 3.07 -156% | 2.6 -117% | 2.25 -88% | 4.42 -268% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.8 | 2.61 7% | 1.3 54% | 4.74 -69% | 4.4 -57% | 4.62 -65% | 7.16 -156% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.8 | 0.99 -24% | 1.52 -90% | 2 -150% | 4.3 -438% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 1.2 37% | 1.1 42% | 3.6 -89% | 2.7 -42% | 1.7 11% | 3.2 -68% |
Gamma | 2.14 103% | 2.4 92% | 2.24 98% | 2.29 96% | 2.18 101% | 2.3 96% | 2.04 108% |
CCT | 6821 95% | 6563 99% | 6330 103% | 6316 103% | 6751 96% | 6737 96% | |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63 | 61 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98 | 95 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 4% /
2% | 146% /
261% | -29% /
-36% | -7% /
-25% | 13% /
-10% | -37% /
-71% |
* ... smaller is better
传统上,Surface设备的显示屏开箱后非常准确,在我们用专业的CalMAN软件和X-Rite i1 Pro 2分光光度计校准后,我们可以确认Surface Laptop Studio也是如此。灰度中有一个小的蓝色案例,但用肉眼几乎看不到。灰度以及ColorChecker的DeltaE-2000偏差已经较小3。
然而,新的Surface设备再次只覆盖了小的sRGB色域,考虑到指定的Studio和高价格,这有点令人惊讶。现在,大多数面向内容创作者的高质量笔记本电脑都覆盖了P3参考值,这也是OLED屏幕使用增加的结果。
我们设法通过自己的校准来改善图片质量,轻微的偏蓝现象也消失了。相应的配置文件可以在上面的显示框中免费下载。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise | |
↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
58.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26.8 ms rise | |
↘ 31.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 5000 Hz | ≤ 98 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 5000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 98 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 5000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
由于亮度高,你可以在户外使用Surface Laptop Studio,但在非常明亮或有阳光的日子里会面临反射,以舒适地看到显示内容。IPS屏幕的可视角度非常宽,当你把Surface Laptop Studio作为平板电脑使用时,你仍然可以从各个角度看到内容而不失真。
性能 - Surface Laptop Studio仍然具有Tiger Lake
新的Surface Laptop Studio仍然使用英特尔的Tiger Lake 处理器。这里的一个方面肯定是相应的Alder Lake芯片还没有出现,但我们仍然对选择Tiger Lake-H35芯片感到惊讶。我们已经介绍过几次这个话题,这些芯片基本上是普通的Tiger Lake-U CPU,如酷睿i7-1165G7,这在许多超极本中使用了大约两年,而H35型号只是以更高的TDP数字运作。这意味着你只能得到四个CPU核心和更快的iGPUIris Xe Graphics G7,所以当你把CPU与专用显卡结合起来时,就没有什么意义了。
审查设置
微软没有实施任何额外的能源配置文件,所有的设置都由Windows性能滑块控制。以下所有的基准和测量都是在 "最佳性能 "设置下进行的。
处理器 - 酷睿i7-11370H
英特尔的酷睿i7-11370H是一个Tiger Lake-H35处理器,有四个核心(八个线程),在所有活跃的核心上分别运行高达4.8 GHz或4.3 GHz。该CPU在这里短时间内的功耗可以略高于50W,并迅速平息在40W。基准测试结果证实,它基本上只是一个普通的Tiger Lake-U处理器,功率稍大一些。这款酷睿i7-1185G7在微星Summit E14例如,并没有慢多少(~15%)。
英特尔的四核在与AMD的竞争中没有机会,他们目前的CPU速度几乎是AMD的两倍,而且由于核心数量的增加,英特尔新的Alder Lake芯片也有很大优势。但即使考虑到Alder Lake芯片只是没有准备好,我们也不明白为什么微软不使用Tiger Lake H45 CPU,如酷睿i7-11800H.我们选择了一款早期评测单位的ThinkPad P1 G4的早期评测单元进行比较,其TDP值相近,多核性能仍然高出40%左右。即使是酷睿i5-11400H中的酷睿i5-11400H戴尔XPS 15尽管TDP值较低,为35瓦,但速度更快。
新的Surface笔记本电脑工作室与之相比,看起来不是特别好 Apple的M1 Pro CPU.在Cinebench R15中,即使是最慢的8个核心的型号也要快30%左右,尽管这个应用必须是仿真的。在Cinebench R23 Multi等原生基准测试中,这一优势增加到了50%左右。
不要误解我们的意思,酷睿i7-11370H的性能对于日常任务来说是绰绰有余的,单核性能与目前来自Apple 和AMD的对手相比仍有竞争力,但是新的Alder Lake芯片由于其新的性能核心,再次提供了超过20%的大改进。总而言之,CPU的性能本可以好得多。我们期望Surface Laptop Studio的入门级SKU的性能数据可以与之相媲美,其配置为酷睿i5-11300H,在这里芯片更有意义,因为你实际上会使用更快的iGPU。
CPU的性能不会因为电池电量而降低。更多的CPU基准测试被列在我们的 技术部分.
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry -8! | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 -2! | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS -2! | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 -2! |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=103, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (3696 - 6646, n=12) |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (1081 - 1556, n=11) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (1438 - 2578, n=11) | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (475 - 601, n=11) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (606 - 1086, n=17) | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=89, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (162.9 - 233, n=15) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (432 - 762, n=11) | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (18961 - 28520, n=11) | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (5074 - 5550, n=11) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (3828 - 6115, n=10) | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2555, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (1376 - 1607, n=10) | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (4.98 - 8.82, n=11) | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=81, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (23.6 - 56.5, n=11) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (0.544 - 0.596, n=11) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (5204 - 8413, n=10) | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (23958 - 34020, n=10) | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (1656 - 2297, n=10) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (42086 - 52930, n=10) | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (3755 - 5027, n=10) | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (14433 - 20417, n=10) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (44267 - 76866, n=10) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (289 - 422, n=10) | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (2756 - 4551, n=10) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (15892 - 40069, n=10) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 |
系统性能
评测单位的主观性能印象非常好,因为处理器足够强大,可以完成日常任务,而且快速的PCI-SSD确保输入可以快速执行,当你启动应用程序时,加载时间非常短。合成基准分数在比较组中是平均水平。我们在审查期间没有遇到任何问题或崩溃。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (5538 - 5838, n=2) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (8715 - 9234, n=2) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (8342 - 8806, n=2) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (6343 - 6641, n=2) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2255, n=90, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (1407 - 1502, n=2) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=90, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (1417 - 1555, n=2) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2795, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (1452 - 1472, n=2) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (1202 - 1501, n=2) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry |
PCMark 10 Score | 5538 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years) | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (32035 - 64524, n=10) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years) | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (37216 - 62417, n=10) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years) | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (36920 - 65610, n=10) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Average Intel Core i7-11370H (73.4 - 103, n=10) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
我们的标准化延迟测试(网页浏览、YouTube 4K、CPU负载)没有显示出Surface laptop Studio的任何问题,在视频播放过程中也没有掉帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
微软使用的是普通的M.2-2280 SSD,但该设备不支持最新的PCIe 4.0标准。来自SK海力士(BC711)的PCIe 3.0 x4固态硬盘的传输速率仍然非常好,不会有任何限制。我们的评测装置提供了1TB的存储容量,在初始设置后,你可以将894GB用于自己的文件和应用程序。
如前所述,用户不能更换固态硬盘,所以你应该在购买设备之前考虑你需要多少存储空间。更多的固态硬盘基准测试可在我们的 技术部分.
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能 -GeForce RTX 3050 Ti,50W TGP
包括播放高分辨率视频在内的轻度工作负荷将主要由集成的Iris Xe Graphics G7处理器处理。专用的GeForce RTX 3050 Ti4GB GDDR6-VRAM,当你在游戏中需要更多性能时,例如,通过Nvidia的Optimus技术自动激活。它是TGP为50W,最大核心时钟为1455MHz的版本。有更快的RTX 3050 Ti版本(最高80W TGP),所以与我们数据库中该GPU的平均结果相比,基准测试结果稍低。与旧的GTX 1650 Max-Q的Surface Book 3然而,RTX 3050 Ti提供了明显的更多性能。
在持续的工作负荷下,GPU的性能是完全稳定的,苛刻的3DMarkTime Spy 压力测试也很容易通过,达到99.3%。在电池供电的情况下,GPU的功耗被限制在35W,这导致了大约20%的性能赤字(4893分与3944分@Time Spy Graphics)。更多的GPU基准测试可在 这里.
商业客户还可以获得带有以下功能的Surface Laptop StudioRTX A2000而不是RTX 3050 Ti,后者为专业应用提供特殊的驱动认证。然而,基本的性能水平与RTX 3050 Ti相似。
3DMark 11 Performance | 15393 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 25704 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 10493 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4987 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
RTX 3050 Ti足够强大,可以在许多作品中实现高细节的流畅的1080p游戏,但你通常不会达到显示器的120 Hz。在较长的时间里,游戏性能再次得到稳定,但在电池电量方面的表现却有点低。然而,差异并不像合成测试中那么大。 Witcher 3 例如,Ultra在超过35帧的情况下仍然很流畅。请看我们的 技术部分了解更多游戏基准测试
F1 2021 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Average of class Multimedia (46 - 264, n=15, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (68 - 131, n=11) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x | |
Average of class Multimedia (31.5 - 149.8, n=14, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (44.4 - 69, n=11) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti |
GTA V | |
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (53.8 - 149, n=25) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Average of class Multimedia (11.9 - 186.1, n=82, last 2 years) | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (27.8 - 75.6, n=26) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=81, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 170 | 163 | 111 | 63.2 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 212 | 145 | 85 | 41.6 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 137 | 121 | 115 | 111 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 101 | 63.8 | 45 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 101 | 89.8 | 75.2 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 117 | 81 | 75 | 70 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 256 | 119 | 96.2 | 82.3 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 102 | 78 | 60 | 49 |
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 178 | 77 | 52 | 37 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 97 | 76 | 55 | 45 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 224 | 136 | 103 | 45.8 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 62 | 60 | 42 | 40 |
排放--表面往往是无声的
系统噪音
微软使用了两个位于基本单元前面区域的风扇。总的来说,风扇的外形非常具有防御性,风扇的速度在负载下会慢慢增加。这意味着当你执行基本任务时,设备通常非常安静,或者风扇的杂音会非常小。也没有恼人的电子声音,例如线圈啸叫。在游戏过程中,几分钟后风扇噪音会达到45 dB(A)左右,这绝对是可以听到的,我们也建议在游戏中使用耳机。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.7 / 24.7 / 24.7 dB(A) |
Load |
| 33.2 / 46.7 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.7 dB(A) |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N | Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00 | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512 | Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-1065G7, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG | SCHENKER Vision 14 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | MSI Summit E14 A11SCS GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1185G7, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -3% | 7% | -2% | -5% | -2% | -8% | |
off / environment * | 24.7 | 25 -1% | 24.8 -0% | 30.2 -22% | 24.3 2% | 25.1 -2% | 23.9 3% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.7 | 25 -1% | 24.8 -0% | 30.2 -22% | 24.3 2% | 25.2 -2% | 24.2 2% |
Idle Average * | 24.7 | 25 -1% | 24.8 -0% | 30.2 -22% | 24.3 2% | 25.2 -2% | 24.2 2% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.7 | 31.5 -28% | 24.8 -0% | 30.2 -22% | 25.9 -5% | 25.2 -2% | 24.2 2% |
Load Average * | 33.2 | 36.7 -11% | 27.8 16% | 32.4 2% | 43.3 -30% | 31 7% | 50.2 -51% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 44.5 | 43.2 3% | 27.8 38% | 25.2 43% | 44.6 -0% | 44 1% | 47 -6% |
Load Maximum * | 46.7 | 36.7 21% | 49.5 -6% | 33.6 28% | 49.5 -6% | 51.7 -11% | 51.7 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
虽然我们不能看机箱内部,但微软的新闻图片给了我们一个很好的概述,并显示了一个相当非传统的方法。处理器位于基本单元的右上方,但两个风扇位于底部角落。这意味着热空气是在机箱的前侧区域散去的,当你使用外部鼠标时,这一点肯定是明显的。与更传统的冷却系统相比,掌托的温度也高得多。
微软通过这种冷却解决方案很好地控制了表面温度,我们只能确定有几个地方的温度超过40℃,即使在压力测试中也是如此。我们认为,在温度稍高的情况下,风扇速度可以更低一点。在轻度工作负荷下,机箱几乎没有升温。
在压力测试中,CPU和GPU的行为相当有趣。在最初的10分钟内,GPU的工作功率为40W,在CPU从30W降到23W后才跳到50W。然而,GPU不能保持这一数值,在测试过程中又略有下降。在综合工作负载中,Surface笔记本电脑工作室通常偏向于GPU,这是有道理的,特别是当你玩游戏的时候。在压力测试后,我们并没有立即注意到任何性能上的不足。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.7 °C / 96.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-6.9 °C / -12.5 F).
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU | Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | SCHENKER Vision 14 Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | MSI Summit E14 A11SCS Intel Core i7-1185G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -10% | -6% | -13% | -29% | -40% | -42% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 42.3 | 46 -9% | 46.8 -11% | 41 3% | 49.7 -17% | 45 -6% | 49.4 -17% |
Maximum Bottom * | 38.2 | 46 -20% | 40.9 -7% | 43.7 -14% | 56 -47% | 44.4 -16% | 60.6 -59% |
Idle Upper Side * | 23.4 | 24.4 -4% | 24.2 -3% | 29.2 -25% | 28.8 -23% | 40.2 -72% | 30.6 -31% |
Idle Bottom * | 23.5 | 24.8 -6% | 24.2 -3% | 27.6 -17% | 30.6 -30% | 39.2 -67% | 37.4 -59% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
微软使用了一个四扬声器系统,你可以在我们包含在维护部分的新闻图片上清楚地看到它们。扬声器的质量非常好,它们甚至创造了一种空间效果。根据我们的分析,低音有点低于平均水平,而MacBook Pro 14在这方面总体上要好一点,但Surface Laptop Studio绝对不必躲在对手后面。
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - 运行时间比宣传的短得多
消耗功率
我们的空闲测量值非常低,尽管有高分辨率和良好的亮度,所以Surface Laptop Studio是这里最高效的设备。然而,微软应该再看看待机功耗,2.6W的功耗实在是太高了。在游戏过程中,你可以期待80W左右,我们在压力测试中记录到97W,很快就平息到92W。因此,附带的102W电源适配器,提供一个额外的USB-A端口用于充电,是完全足够的。
Off / Standby | 0.1 / 2.6 Watt |
Idle | 2.6 / 7.1 / 7.9 Watt |
Load |
76.8 / 97.3 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N, IPS, 2400x1600, 14.4" | Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2" | Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.5" | SCHENKER Vision 14 i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | MSI Summit E14 A11SCS i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162, IPS, 3840x2160, 14" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -158% | -5% | -29% | -59% | -129% | -100% | -95% | -58% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.6 | 18.6 -615% | 2.9 -12% | 4.8 -85% | 6.7 -158% | 9.4 -262% | 9.9 -281% | 8.2 ? -215% | 6.54 ? -152% |
Idle Average * | 7.1 | 20.6 -190% | 11.6 -63% | 9.4 -32% | 12.6 -77% | 15.8 -123% | 17.4 -145% | 12.6 ? -77% | 11.3 ? -59% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.9 | 22.6 -186% | 11.9 -51% | 11.2 -42% | 15.4 -95% | 24.1 -205% | 22.5 -185% | 17.2 ? -118% | 13.3 ? -68% |
Load Average * | 76.8 | 66 14% | 49.5 36% | 72 6% | 85.7 -12% | 76.8 -0% | 85.6 -11% | 92 ? -20% | 70.7 ? 8% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 83 | 67 19% | 58.2 30% | 83 -0% | 154 -86% | 70.9 15% | |||
Load Maximum * | 97.3 | 86 12% | 68.5 30% | 90 8% | 110.9 -14% | 189.7 -95% | 91.1 6% | 139.1 ? -43% | 116.1 ? -19% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power Consumption external screen
电池运行时间
微软宣传说,在150尼特的亮度水平和典型的Surface使用情况下,58WH电池的运行时间可达18小时,但这些测试也包括待机时间。我们的连续使用测试也是在150尼特(在这种情况下是最大亮度的62%)下进行的,结果要短得多。视频播放可能超过12小时,但我们的Wi-Fi测试只运行了8小时,当我们在最大显示亮度下重复测试时只有6小时。这些结果在对比组中并不差,只有Apple的MacBook Pro 14有一个优势。
当设备开启时,电池充满电需要两个多小时,37分钟后可获得50%的容量。
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 58 Wh | Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, 56 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, 69.9 Wh | Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 69 Wh | SCHENKER Vision 14 i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 53 Wh | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 62 Wh | MSI Summit E14 A11SCS i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, 52 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 12% | 36% | 98% | -11% | 12% | -24% | 37% | |
H.264 | 739 | 645 -13% | 900 22% | 405 -45% | 847 ? 15% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 480 | 506 5% | 816 70% | 396 -17% | 327 -32% | 439 -9% | 271 -44% | 640 ? 33% |
Load | 60 | 87 45% | 69 15% | 188 213% | 86 43% | 79 32% | 58 -3% | 97.1 ? 62% |
Reader / Idle | 991 | 828 | 396 | 1168 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论--Surface Laptop Studio不是 "专业"。
新的Surface Laptop Studio带有可折叠显示屏,应该是为了取代旧的笔记本而在我们的审查之后,总体印象是好的。构建质量和材料都是一流的,两个组件的性能利用是稳固的,而且该设备在显示屏或扬声器方面也没有显示任何重大缺陷。折叠机制也给人留下了卖座的印象,但它在多年后的表现如何,还有待观察。所谓的演示模式也不理想,因为它覆盖了整个键盘。
我们对CPU的选择感到惊讶。英特尔的Tiger Lake 四核当然可以为日常任务提供足够的性能,但是AMD和Apple 的当前一代移动芯片已经更快,而且新的型号将在未来几周内推出。带有更快的iGPU的酷睿i5对于入门级SKU来说更有意义一些,但是当你把它与GeForce RTX 3050 Ti这样的专用GPU结合起来时,你就不能利用更快的iGPU。H45处理器将需要一个不同的主板,因此需要更多的开发成本,但性能会有竞争力。
新的Surface Laptop Studio是一个有趣的产品,是你日常工作的好伙伴,但是英特尔四核处理器的CPU性能令人失望,特别是考虑到高昂的价格,所以你为旧技术支付了很多钱。微软还说该设备是为专业用户设计的,但我们认为Surface Laptop Studio不符合这一说法。我们强烈建议尽快推出采用英特尔新的Alder Lake CPU的更新机型。
显然,你总是可以推荐新机型,特别是在移动领域,但是新的Alder Lake CPU在CPU性能方面是我们多年来没有看到的一大进步。微软应该迅速推出Surface Laptop Studio的更新型号,因为该设备与缓慢的Tiger Lake 四核几乎没有竞争力。显示屏相当不错,但我们感到惊讶的是,它再一次只覆盖了小的sRGB色域,而竞争对手主要关注更广泛的P3色彩空间。我们也不理解完全缺乏维护选项(你甚至不能清洁风扇)。
新的Surface Laptop Studio几乎提供了你从普通Surface笔记本电脑得到的东西,但功能更多一些。一个适合日常工作负荷的好设备。问题是价格太高,我们认为这里有很多未使用的潜力。Apple'sMacBook Pro 14在某些方面更胜一筹,而且处于相同的价格范围。同样的硬件设备也可用于更便宜的系统,如Schenker的Vision 14,而Razer Blade 14配备Ryzen CPU和RTX 3070 GPU,显示了14英寸系统的性能潜力。
价格和可用性
我们的审查配置目前在百思买的售价为 2499美元(库存),而配备Core i5和iGPU(16GB内存和256GB固态硬盘)的入门级型号已经,起价1399美元。.
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
- 03/08/2022 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff