Notebookcheck Logo

微软Surface Laptop Studio评论。有趣的概念与缓慢的英特尔CPU

创新的敞篷车?

微软的Surface Laptop Studio终于在德国推出。可折叠显示屏是一个有趣的概念,但该设备被英特尔缓慢的Tiger Lake 四核处理器所拖累。
Convertible / 2-in-1 Geforce Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Tiger Lake Touchscreen Windows

Surface Laptop Studio是微软的一个全新设计,是对普通Surface Laptop的补充。笔记本电脑笔记本(13和15英寸)的可拆卸显示单元已经停产,新的Surface Laptop Studio的14.4英寸屏幕几乎是替代产品。显示屏不再是可拆卸的,但由于新的铰链,它可以向前倾斜或作为平板电脑使用。

微软使用英特尔的Tiger Lake-H35处理器,因此它们仍然是四核处理器,集成了Iris Xe Graphics G7。酷睿i5-11300H SKU的价格从1699欧元开始,配备16GB内存和256GB SSD存储。如果你需要更多的GPU能力,你可以得到一个版本的Core i7-11370H和专用的GeForce RTX 3050 Ti的版本,其起价为2199欧元。我们的评测单位是高端机型,配备i7/RTX 3050 Ti,32GB内存以及1TB SSD存储,价格为2799欧元。所有型号都有相同的14.4英寸IPS屏幕,长宽比为3:2,提供2400 x 1600像素的高分辨率以及120 Hz的刷新率。Surface Slim Pen 2不是包装的一部分,必须单独购买,价格为130欧元。

Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti (Surface Laptop Studio Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-11370H 4 x 3.3 - 4.8 GHz, 51 W PL2 / Short Burst, 40 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-H35
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1455 MHz, RAM: 1375 MHz, 50 W TDP, GDDR6, 511.79, Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, LPDDR4x-4266, Dual-Channel, onboard
Display
14.40 inch 3:2, 2400 x 1600 pixel 200 PPI, capacitive, LQ144P1JX01, IPS, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP
Storage
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N, 1024 GB 
, 894 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake-U/Y PCH-LP - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm , Brightness Sensor
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19 x 323 x 228
Battery
58 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 1080p
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Quad Speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 102W PSU, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.831 kg, Power Supply: 379 g
Price
2799 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
89 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2022
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
1.8 kg19 mm14.40"2400x1600
87.4 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2021
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
1.8 kg23.9 mm14.00"1920x1080
92.7 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2021
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
1.6 kg15.5 mm14.20"3024x1964
86.9 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2020
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
1.6 kg23 mm13.50"3000x2000
87.7 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2022
SCHENKER Vision 14
i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
1.1 kg15.6 mm14.00"2880x1800
87.5 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2021
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
1.8 kg16.8 mm14.00"2560x1440
82.3 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2021
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
1.3 kg16 mm14.00"3840x2160

案例 - 带有可折叠显示屏的Surface Laptop Studio

我们已经 报道了关于一个新的折叠机制专利与潜在的Surface Book 4相结合。我们现在知道,微软将这种铰链用于新的Surface Laptop Studio。该设备基本上是一个普通的笔记本电脑,在屏幕的中间有一个额外的铰链。这意味着你可以在两个位置上将屏幕向前倾斜,一个位置在键盘前面(似乎是用磁铁固定),或者你可以把它放到键盘上,把Surface Laptop Studio作为平板电脑使用。我们已经熟悉了这个概念,从Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel我们已经从宏碁ConceptD 3 Ezel中熟悉了这个概念,在那里,带有额外铰链的机制虽然有点笨重。

笔记本电脑模式
笔记本电脑模式
演示模式
演示模式
平板电脑模式
平板电脑模式

中间 "位置可用于观看视频或用游戏板玩游戏。显然,你也可以使用触摸屏进行输入,或者使用可选的笔,但这种情况下的隐藏式键盘肯定不理想,而且你无法使用音量或亮度控制。

铰链机制本身给人留下了坚实的印象,并不显得摇晃或脆弱,但问题是随着时间的推移,特别是考虑到电缆,它将如何经受住考验。微软宣传说,电缆可以折叠180度。显示器后面的下半部分由布覆盖,感觉很精致。常规的显示屏铰链也调整得很好,但当你调整屏幕的开启角度时,会有一些反弹,最大的开启角度被限制在135度。

铰链机制给人留下了坚实的印象。
铰链机制给人留下了坚实的印象。
有两个 "层 "的基本单元。
有两个 "层 "的基本单元。

这种不寻常的设计延续到基本单元,它由两层组成。下层部分和上层部分,上层部分四面都比较宽。我们熟悉其他制造商的这种基本方法,具有锥形设计的设备看起来比实际情况更苗条,但过渡通常更平滑,不像Surface Laptop Studio那样有角度。抬起设备非常容易,但设计本身(按照惯例)绝对是一个品味问题。对于现代设备来说,屏幕边框相对较宽,约为10毫米(屏幕与机身比例:84%)。

微软的Surface设备总是有很好的制造质量,新的Surface Laptop Studio也不例外。制造质量无懈可击,由铝和镁制成的机箱的亚光表面触感很好,而且也不太容易沾染灰尘。我们对评测单位的稳定性也完全满意。

新的设计方法导致了一个相当大的机箱,Surface Laptop Studio是最大的设备之一,超过1.8公斤,也是对比组中最重的设备之一。102W电源适配器的重量为379克。如果你选择没有GeForce dGPU的Core i5 SKU,你会得到一个更紧凑的65W电源适配器(309克)。

尺寸比较

326.7 mm 229 mm 23.9 mm 1.8 kg323 mm 228 mm 19 mm 1.8 kg319.7 mm 220 mm 16.8 mm 1.8 kg312 mm 232 mm 23 mm 1.6 kg319 mm 219 mm 16 mm 1.3 kg312.6 mm 221.2 mm 15.5 mm 1.6 kg308.8 mm 215 mm 15.6 mm 1.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - Thunderbolt 4和Surface Connect

表面连接端口
表面连接端口

微软仍然使用自己的Surface Connect端口,并提供一些相应的配件,如对接站。不过,连接器本身仍然不理想。得益于笔直的侧壁,与Surface Laptop等有角度的侧壁相比,更容易连接连接器,但电缆会根据不同的方向挡住3.5毫米立体声插孔。你还得到两个支持Thunderbolt 4的USB-C端口,所以它们也可以用于第三方扩展坞。你没有得到任何其他端口,如普通的USB-A或SD卡阅读器。

左侧:2个USB-C和Thunderbolt 4(USB 4.0,Power Delivery,DisplayPort)。
左侧:2个USB-C和Thunderbolt 4(USB 4.0,Power Delivery,DisplayPort)。
右侧:3.5毫米立体声,表面连接
右侧:3.5毫米立体声,表面连接

沟通

通信模块仅限于基本要求,因为来自英特尔的AX200模块支持Wi-Fi 6(802.11ax)和蓝牙5.1,但已经存在两年多了,而且已经有更现代的型号,如AX210E。然而,在我们用Netgear的参考路由器(Nighthawk AX12)进行测试时,信号质量和传输速率都非常好,在实践中也没有任何限制。没有LTE或5G调制解调器的选项。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1446 (662min - 1538max) MBit/s
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1422 (1271min - 1715max) MBit/s -2%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1386 (1229min - 1460max) MBit/s -4%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1183 (575min - 1294max) MBit/s -18%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (447 - 1645, n=127)
1104 MBit/s -24%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
998 (787min - 1041max) MBit/s -31%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
689 (349min - 730max) MBit/s -52%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
670 (651min - 692max) MBit/s -54%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1617 (1531min - 1678max) MBit/s +25%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1450 (1161min - 1555max) MBit/s +12%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1293 (1024min - 1492max) MBit/s
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1231 (1114min - 1299max) MBit/s -5%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (523 - 1684, n=128)
1191 MBit/s -8%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1079 (989min - 1182max) MBit/s -17%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
913 (853min - 932max) MBit/s -29%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
730 (645min - 824max) MBit/s -44%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500Tooltip
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1292 (1024-1492)
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1424 (662-1538)

网络摄像头

微软使用了一个1080p的网络摄像头,在良好的照明条件下画质还可以,但制造商在Surface Pro和Surface Go型号中提供了更好的模块。除了网络摄像头外,还有一个红外线摄像头,支持通过Windows Hello进行面部识别。

ColorChecker
19.1 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
15 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
12 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
16 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti: 11.51 ∆E min: 3.6 - max: 20.3 ∆E

辅料

我们已经提到,Surface Slim Pen 2必须单独购买,价格为130欧元。它可以存放在底座下面的前面,也可以在那里充电。微软还提供其他配件,如输入设备或扩展坞。

维护

新的Surface Laptop Studio没有提供任何维修选项。微软说M.2-SSD可以被替换,你也可以在微软下面的新闻图片中认出M.2-2280插槽,但没有可见的螺丝,用户无法接触到内部结构。官方技术规格还指出,用户不得更换固态硬盘(只能由授权技术人员更换)。你甚至不能清洗风扇。

内部布局(来源:微软)
内部布局(来源:微软)

输入设备 - 微软使用Force Touchpad

键盘

看一下键盘,就会发现与以前的型号相比有区别,因为现在的按键颜色是深灰色调,不再是底座的颜色了。另一方面,良好的机制并没有改变,打字体验非常舒适。由于足够的键程和精确的击键,输入较长的文本没有问题,而且三段式白色照明在较暗的环境中也有帮助。

输入设备
输入设备
键盘照明
键盘照明

触摸板和触摸屏

微软效仿Apple,为Surface Laptop Studio配备了一个强制触摸板(我们没有找到微软的任何官方说法),所以你不能用物理方式按压该触摸板。触觉反馈是由一个振动马达产生的,这使得整个触摸板表面(12 x 8厘米)的反馈均匀,光标控制工作良好。我们只在待机后遇到了一些问题,即触摸板似乎过于敏感。然而,我们只注意到两次,一些驱动优化应该可以解决这个问题。

电容式触摸屏的工作情况与预期的一样好。微软宣传支持与Surface Slim Pen 2结合使用的触觉反馈,但我们没有笔来测试它。

显示屏 - 像素感应与120赫兹

子像素布局
子像素布局
侧面有明显的背光灯渗漏
侧面有明显的背光灯渗漏

Surface Laptop Studio的显示屏采用14.4英寸IPS面板,分辨率为2400 x 1600像素,长宽比为3:2。边框和机箱的其他部分一样是圆形的,所以显示器角落里的内容被稍微切断了。它并没有真正隐藏任何内容,但在实践中你会注意到它。主观的图片印象非常好,这也是超过1700:1的高对比度的结果。我们确定平均亮度为近500尼特,黑值为0.29cd/m²,很不错。

在高亮度水平下,你可以看到在黑暗背景下的侧边有背光渗出,但在日常场景中它们是没有问题的。我们可以在98%或更低的亮度水平上检测到PWM闪烁,但频率非常高,为5 kHz,大多数用户应该不会注意到任何问题。响应时间不是最快的,例如,当你移动光标时有明显的重影效果。120赫兹的刷新率不能解决这个问题,主要是在你滚动浏览文件或网站时创造一个更平滑的画面印象。由于有环境光传感器,显示器亮度可以自动调整,也支持杜比视界内容,但由于HDR能力有限,与好的电视相比,效果要小得多。

501
cd/m²
508
cd/m²
493
cd/m²
505
cd/m²
497
cd/m²
484
cd/m²
489
cd/m²
478
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LQ144P1JX01 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 508 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 491.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 496 cd/m²
Contrast: 1714:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.8
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
78.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
80.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.14
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
LQ144P1JX01, IPS, 2400x1600, 14.4"
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
B140HAN06.D, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14"
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2"
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Panasonic MEI96A2, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.5"
SCHENKER Vision 14
MNE007ZA1, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
TL140BDXP02-2, IPS, 2560x1440, 14"
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
AU Optronics AUO123B, IPS, 3840x2160, 14"
Display
-10%
23%
-14%
-5%
10%
12%
Display P3 Coverage
80.6
67.2
-17%
99.3
23%
63.5
-21%
74.3
-8%
97.2
21%
87.5
9%
sRGB Coverage
99.9
98.2
-2%
95.1
-5%
97.6
-2%
99.9
0%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
78.5
68.7
-12%
65.7
-16%
75.7
-4%
85.4
9%
99.4
27%
Response Times
22%
43%
-28%
27%
64%
-9%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
58.4 ?(26.8, 31.6)
43 ?(13, 30)
26%
58.4 ?(27.6, 30.8)
-0%
57 ?(28, 29)
2%
40.4 ?(18.8, 21.6)
31%
16.4 ?(8, 8.4)
72%
52 ?(27.6, 24.4)
11%
Response Time Black / White *
24 ?(8.4, 15.6)
20 ?(7, 13)
17%
40.4 ?(20.8, 19.6)
-68%
38 ?(22, 16)
-58%
18.4 ?(6, 12.4)
23%
10.8 ?(5.6, 5.2)
55%
30.8 ?(17.6, 13.2)
-28%
PWM Frequency
5000 ?(98)
14880
198%
Screen
1%
372%
-45%
-43%
-35%
-113%
Brightness middle
497
367
-26%
489
-2%
391
-21%
407
-18%
331.1
-33%
593.3
19%
Brightness
491
354
-28%
479
-2%
367
-25%
407
-17%
318
-35%
571
16%
Brightness Distribution
92
83
-10%
94
2%
86
-7%
94
2%
91
-1%
87
-5%
Black Level *
0.29
0.19
34%
0.01
97%
0.19
34%
0.25
14%
0.36
-24%
0.53
-83%
Contrast
1714
1932
13%
48900
2753%
2058
20%
1628
-5%
920
-46%
1119
-35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.2
1.09
9%
0.8
33%
3.07
-156%
2.6
-117%
2.25
-88%
4.42
-268%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.8
2.61
7%
1.3
54%
4.74
-69%
4.4
-57%
4.62
-65%
7.16
-156%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.8
0.99
-24%
1.52
-90%
2
-150%
4.3
-438%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.9
1.2
37%
1.1
42%
3.6
-89%
2.7
-42%
1.7
11%
3.2
-68%
Gamma
2.14 103%
2.4 92%
2.24 98%
2.29 96%
2.18 101%
2.3 96%
2.04 108%
CCT
6821 95%
6563 99%
6330 103%
6316 103%
6751 96%
6737 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63
61
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
98
95
Total Average (Program / Settings)
4% / 2%
146% / 261%
-29% / -36%
-7% / -25%
13% / -10%
-37% / -71%

* ... smaller is better

传统上,Surface设备的显示屏开箱后非常准确,在我们用专业的CalMAN软件和X-Rite i1 Pro 2分光光度计校准后,我们可以确认Surface Laptop Studio也是如此。灰度中有一个小的蓝色案例,但用肉眼几乎看不到。灰度以及ColorChecker的DeltaE-2000偏差已经较小3。

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
卡尔曼饱和度扫描
卡尔曼饱和度扫描
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN 灰度标定
CalMAN 灰度标定
已校准的CalMAN饱和度扫描
已校准的CalMAN饱和度扫描
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准

然而,新的Surface设备再次只覆盖了小的sRGB色域,考虑到指定的Studio和高价格,这有点令人惊讶。现在,大多数面向内容创作者的高质量笔记本电脑都覆盖了P3参考值,这也是OLED屏幕使用增加的结果。

我们设法通过自己的校准来改善图片质量,轻微的偏蓝现象也消失了。相应的配置文件可以在上面的显示框中免费下载。

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. DCI-P3
vs. DCI-P3
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
58.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26.8 ms rise
↘ 31.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 5000 Hz ≤ 98 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 5000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 98 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 5000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

由于亮度高,你可以在户外使用Surface Laptop Studio,但在非常明亮或有阳光的日子里会面临反射,以舒适地看到显示内容。IPS屏幕的可视角度非常宽,当你把Surface Laptop Studio作为平板电脑使用时,你仍然可以从各个角度看到内容而不失真。

在阳光下
在阳光下
在阳光下
在阳光下
视角稳定
视角稳定

性能 - Surface Laptop Studio仍然具有Tiger Lake

新的Surface Laptop Studio仍然使用英特尔的Tiger Lake 处理器。这里的一个方面肯定是相应的Alder Lake芯片还没有出现,但我们仍然对选择Tiger Lake-H35芯片感到惊讶。我们已经介绍过几次这个话题,这些芯片基本上是普通的Tiger Lake-U CPU,如酷睿i7-1165G7,这在许多超极本中使用了大约两年,而H35型号只是以更高的TDP数字运作。这意味着你只能得到四个CPU核心和更快的iGPUIris Xe Graphics G7,所以当你把CPU与专用显卡结合起来时,就没有什么意义了。

 
 
 

审查设置

微软没有实施任何额外的能源配置文件,所有的设置都由Windows性能滑块控制。以下所有的基准和测量都是在 "最佳性能 "设置下进行的。

处理器 - 酷睿i7-11370H

英特尔的酷睿i7-11370H是一个Tiger Lake-H35处理器,有四个核心(八个线程),在所有活跃的核心上分别运行高达4.8 GHz或4.3 GHz。该CPU在这里短时间内的功耗可以略高于50W,并迅速平息在40W。基准测试结果证实,它基本上只是一个普通的Tiger Lake-U处理器,功率稍大一些。这款酷睿i7-1185G7微星Summit E14例如,并没有慢多少(~15%)。

英特尔的四核在与AMD的竞争中没有机会,他们目前的CPU速度几乎是AMD的两倍,而且由于核心数量的增加,英特尔新的Alder Lake芯片也有很大优势。但即使考虑到Alder Lake芯片只是没有准备好,我们也不明白为什么微软不使用Tiger Lake H45 CPU,如酷睿i7-11800H.我们选择了一款早期评测单位的ThinkPad P1 G4的早期评测单元进行比较,其TDP值相近,多核性能仍然高出40%左右。即使是酷睿i5-11400H中的酷睿i5-11400H戴尔XPS 15尽管TDP值较低,为35瓦,但速度更快。

新的Surface笔记本电脑工作室与之相比,看起来不是特别好 Apple的M1 Pro CPU.在Cinebench R15中,即使是最慢的8个核心的型号也要快30%左右,尽管这个应用必须是仿真的。在Cinebench R23 Multi等原生基准测试中,这一优势增加到了50%左右。

不要误解我们的意思,酷睿i7-11370H的性能对于日常任务来说是绰绰有余的,单核性能与目前来自Apple 和AMD的对手相比仍有竞争力,但是新的Alder Lake芯片由于其新的性能核心,再次提供了超过20%的大改进。总而言之,CPU的性能本可以好得多。我们期望Surface Laptop Studio的入门级SKU的性能数据可以与之相媲美,其配置为酷睿i5-11300H,在这里芯片更有意义,因为你实际上会使用更快的iGPU。

CPU的性能不会因为电池电量而降低。更多的CPU基准测试被列在我们的 技术部分.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

01052103154205256307358409451050115512601365147015751680178518901995Tooltip
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-11370H: Ø947 (936.68-1007.91)
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø943 (736.91-1093.79)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core; Rosetta 2: Ø1311 (1303.74-1319.74)
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø520 (491.24-551.03)
SCHENKER Vision 14 Intel Core i7-11370H; Performance Enthusiast: Ø1053 (1030.18-1070.35)
SCHENKER Vision 14 Intel Core i7-11370H; Performance Balanced: Ø770 (751.09-876.81)
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2052 (2009.65-2060.79)
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS Intel Core i7-1185G7: Ø866 (752.53-901.65)
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1405 (1380.5-1547.99)
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD Intel Core i5-11400H; Ultra-Performance: Ø1187 (1131.35-1276.65)
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD Intel Core i5-11400H: Ø1121 (1099.29-1142.47)
CPU数据 Cinebench R15多循环
CPU数据 Cinebench R15多循环
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H
90.2 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
83.8 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry -8!
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
71.9 pt
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 -2!
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
67.4 pt
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
56.8 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
54.4 pt
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
 
53.5 pt
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS -2!
Intel Core i7-1185G7
50.6 pt
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H
49.9 pt
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 -2!
Intel Core i7-1065G7
30.5 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (6936 - 30789, n=100, last 2 years)
15387 Points +137%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H
15229 Points +134%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
12652 (12516min - 12651.7max) Points +95%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9581 Points +48%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
6495 Points
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
5904 Points -9%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H
5871 Points -10%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5761 (5360.29min - 5761.28max) Points -11%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (3696 - 6646, n=12)
5563 Points -14%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H
1917 Points +28%
Average of class Multimedia
  (878 - 2290, n=91, last 2 years)
1757 Points +17%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
1531 Points +2%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
1497 Points
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1485 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (1081 - 1556, n=11)
1469 Points -2%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
1467 Points -2%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1218 Points -19%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H
1217 Points -19%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Multimedia
  (2681 - 11768, n=86, last 2 years)
5683 Points +125%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H
5491 Points +117%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4876 Points +93%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
2526 Points
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
2351 Points -7%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7
2238 Points -11%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (1438 - 2578, n=11)
2146 Points -15%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H
2137 Points -15%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7
1089 Points -57%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H
734 Points +27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (341 - 853, n=86, last 2 years)
652 Points +13%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
595 Points +3%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7
582 Points +1%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
578 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (475 - 601, n=11)
566 Points -2%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
471 Points -19%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H
466 Points -19%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7
432 Points -25%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H
2779 (2140.64min - 2779.32max) Points +176%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1252 - 4774, n=90, last 2 years)
2435 Points +142%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2061 (2009.65min - 2060.79max) Points +104%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
1320 (1307min - 1320max) Points +31%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H
1094 (736.91min - 1093.79max) Points +9%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
1070 (1030.18min - 1070.35max) Points +6%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
877 (1030.18min - 1070.35max) Points -13%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
1008 (936.68min - 1007.91max) Points
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (606 - 1086, n=17)
946 Points -6%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7
902 (752.53min - 901.65max) Points -11%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7
552 (491min - 552max) Points -45%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H
275 Points +23%
Average of class Multimedia
  (99.6 - 323, n=86, last 2 years)
257 Points +15%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
232 Points +4%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7
224 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
223 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (162.9 - 233, n=15)
220 Points -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
210 Points -6%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H
197 Points -12%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
197 Points -12%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7
184 Points -17%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7
1340 Seconds * -173%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (432 - 762, n=11)
531 Seconds * -8%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7
524 Seconds * -7%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
491 Seconds *
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H
466 Seconds * +5%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
451 Seconds * +8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (107 - 502, n=84, last 2 years)
253 Seconds * +48%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
251 Seconds * +49%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H
217 Seconds * +56%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H
64146 MIPS +139%
Average of class Multimedia
  (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years)
60265 MIPS +125%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
52370 MIPS +95%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
28410 MIPS +6%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
26809 MIPS
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H
26653 MIPS -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (18961 - 28520, n=11)
25340 MIPS -5%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7
24339 MIPS -9%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7
11929 MIPS -56%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H
6102 MIPS +20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years)
5722 MIPS +12%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
5550 MIPS +9%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (5074 - 5550, n=11)
5290 MIPS +4%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
5104 MIPS
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H
5079 MIPS 0%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5036 MIPS -1%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4791 MIPS -6%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7
4100 MIPS -20%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H
13796 Points +142%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4990 - 23059, n=86, last 2 years)
11967 Points +110%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9942 Points +74%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H
5803 Points +2%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
5775 Points +1%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
5701 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (3828 - 6115, n=10)
5258 Points -8%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7
4060 Points -29%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H
1892 Points +22%
Average of class Multimedia
  (891 - 2342, n=86, last 2 years)
1818 Points +17%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
1769 Points +14%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
1601 Points +3%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
1551 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (1376 - 1607, n=10)
1540 Points -1%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7
1294 Points -17%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H
1285 Points -17%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H
17.2 fps +117%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years)
16.4 fps +107%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.3 fps +93%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
8.82 fps +11%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
7.93 fps
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H
7.6 fps -4%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (4.98 - 8.82, n=11)
7.24 fps -9%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7
6.81 fps -14%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7
2.98 fps -62%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7
69.8 s * -28%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7
59.3 s * -9%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
58.9 s * -8%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H
55.5 s * -2%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
54.6 s *
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.7 - 146.7, n=80, last 2 years)
49.6 s * +9%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
47.9 s * +12%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (23.6 - 56.5, n=11)
45.9 s * +16%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H
41.9 s * +23%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7
0.757 sec * -27%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.603 sec * -1%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.599 sec * -1%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
0.596 sec *
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7
0.579 sec * +3%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (0.544 - 0.596, n=11)
0.564 sec * +5%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H
0.544 sec * +9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years)
0.484 sec * +19%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.428 sec * +28%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1008 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
119 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
223 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2526 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
578 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1497 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
6495 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
90.9 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
88 pt
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
53.2 pt
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
51.5 pt
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
48.8 pt
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
 
48.7 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
47.9 pt
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
35.9 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
14653 KRay/s +102%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years)
14429 KRay/s +99%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
8413 KRay/s +16%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
8091 KRay/s +11%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
7269 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (5204 - 8413, n=10)
7260 KRay/s 0%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
7115 KRay/s -2%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
4004 KRay/s -45%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
95088 Points +202%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years)
72714 Points +131%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
42785 Points +36%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
34020 Points +8%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
31471 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (23958 - 34020, n=10)
30771 Points -2%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
30267 Points -4%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
23109 Points -27%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Multimedia
  (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years)
3389 MB/s +65%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
3161 MB/s +54%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2287 MB/s +11%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
2076 MB/s +1%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (1656 - 2297, n=10)
2074 MB/s +1%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2059 MB/s
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
1992 MB/s -3%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
1518 MB/s -26%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Multimedia
  (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years)
90849 Points +90%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
87865 Points +83%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
70485 Points +47%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
52839 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (42086 - 52930, n=10)
50786 Points +6%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
49853 Points +4%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
47895 Points
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
37931 Points -21%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
10899 Points +139%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years)
9329 Points +104%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
7117 Points +56%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
5025 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (3755 - 5027, n=10)
4736 Points +4%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
4729 Points +4%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
4567 Points
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
3837 Points -16%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
52839 Points +188%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years)
36169 Points +97%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
21187 Points +16%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
20417 Points +11%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
18385 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (14433 - 20417, n=10)
18332 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
18322 Points
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
13800 Points -25%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
120371 MB/s +172%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
76839 MB/s +74%
Average of class Multimedia
  (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years)
75995 MB/s +72%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (44267 - 76866, n=10)
68494 MB/s +55%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
44267 MB/s
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
39869 MB/s -10%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
29660 MB/s -33%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
27420 MB/s -38%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Multimedia
  (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years)
935 MB/s +188%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
772 MB/s +138%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
486 MB/s +50%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
422 MB/s +30%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (289 - 422, n=10)
377 MB/s +16%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
343 MB/s +6%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
325 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
278 MB/s -14%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
8425 KRay/s +116%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years)
7836 KRay/s +101%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
4551 KRay/s +17%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
4357 KRay/s +12%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (2756 - 4551, n=10)
3927 KRay/s +1%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
3897 KRay/s
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
3887 KRay/s 0%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
2204 KRay/s -43%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
42474 MPixel/s +13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years)
40459 MPixel/s +8%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
37512 MPixel/s
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
33456 MPixel/s -11%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (15892 - 40069, n=10)
28235 MPixel/s -25%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
27992 MPixel/s -25%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
18528 MPixel/s -51%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
15432 MPixel/s -59%

系统性能

评测单位的主观性能印象非常好,因为处理器足够强大,可以完成日常任务,而且快速的PCI-SSD确保输入可以快速执行,当你启动应用程序时,加载时间非常短。合成基准分数在比较组中是平均水平。我们在审查期间没有遇到任何问题或崩溃。

PCMark 10 / Score
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
6967 Points +26%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years)
6795 Points +23%
SCHENKER Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5838 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (5538 - 5838, n=2)
5688 Points +3%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
5538 Points
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1185G7, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
5325 Points -4%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
4690 Points -15%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-1065G7, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
4184 Points -24%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Multimedia
  (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years)
10521 Points +21%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
10413 Points +19%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
10098 Points +16%
SCHENKER Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9234 Points +6%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1185G7, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
9025 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (8715 - 9234, n=2)
8975 Points +3%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
8715 Points
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-1065G7, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
8266 Points -5%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9381 Points +12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years)
8932 Points +7%
SCHENKER Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8806 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (8342 - 8806, n=2)
8574 Points +3%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
8342 Points
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1185G7, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
8088 Points -3%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
7519 Points -10%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-1065G7, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
6448 Points -23%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9395 Points +48%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years)
9202 Points +45%
SCHENKER Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6641 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6343 - 6641, n=2)
6492 Points +2%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
6343 Points
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1185G7, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
5616 Points -11%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-1065G7, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
3731 Points -41%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
3688 Points -42%
CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Multimedia
  (978 - 2184, n=87, last 2 years)
1703 Points +21%
SCHENKER Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1502 Points +7%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
1490 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1407 - 1502, n=2)
1455 Points +3%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
1407 Points
CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Multimedia
  (913 - 2064, n=87, last 2 years)
1616 Points +14%
SCHENKER Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1555 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1417 - 1555, n=2)
1486 Points +5%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
1417 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
1305 Points -8%
CrossMark / Creativity
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
1915 Points +30%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1054 - 2594, n=87, last 2 years)
1909 Points +30%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
1472 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1452 - 1472, n=2)
1462 Points -1%
SCHENKER Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1452 Points -1%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
SCHENKER Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1501 Points +25%
Average of class Multimedia
  (869 - 2171, n=87, last 2 years)
1435 Points +19%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1202 - 1501, n=2)
1352 Points +12%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
1202 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
1044 Points -13%
PCMark 10 Score
5538 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Multimedia
  (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years)
68580 MB/s +15%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
61355 MB/s +3%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
59479 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
46478 MB/s -22%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (32035 - 64524, n=10)
46184 MB/s -22%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
46072 MB/s -23%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
38214 MB/s -36%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
30125 MB/s -49%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Multimedia
  (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years)
69599 MB/s +21%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
60212 MB/s +5%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
57407 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
50595 MB/s -12%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (37216 - 62417, n=10)
48210 MB/s -16%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
47864 MB/s -17%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
43848 MB/s -24%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
33759 MB/s -41%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Multimedia
  (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years)
69752 MB/s +14%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
62732 MB/s +2%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
61263 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
49193 MB/s -20%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (36920 - 65610, n=10)
48631 MB/s -21%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
46199 MB/s -25%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
34338 MB/s -44%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
34240 MB/s -44%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
111 ns * -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years)
106.6 ns * -6%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
101 ns *
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
95.9 ns * +5%
Average Intel Core i7-11370H
  (73.4 - 103, n=10)
89.5 ns * +11%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
84.8 ns * +16%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
73.4 ns * +27%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
64.6 ns * +36%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

我们的标准化延迟测试(网页浏览、YouTube 4K、CPU负载)没有显示出Surface laptop Studio的任何问题,在视频播放过程中也没有掉帧。

LatencyMon概述
LatencyMon概述
LatencyMon 驱动程序
LatencyMon 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
1163 μs * -55%
SCHENKER Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1052 μs * -40%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1185G7, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
1032 μs * -37%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
752 μs *
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-1065G7, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
615 μs * +18%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
392.6 μs * +48%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

微软使用的是普通的M.2-2280 SSD,但该设备不支持最新的PCIe 4.0标准。来自SK海力士(BC711)的PCIe 3.0 x4固态硬盘的传输速率仍然非常好,不会有任何限制。我们的评测装置提供了1TB的存储容量,在初始设置后,你可以将894GB用于自己的文件和应用程序。

如前所述,用户不能更换固态硬盘,所以你应该在购买设备之前考虑你需要多少存储空间。更多的固态硬盘基准测试可在我们的 技术部分.

SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3485 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3018 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 401.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 382.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 72.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 144.6 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 391.1 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 813 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
87.6 pt
Average SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
 
69.1 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
67 pt
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
65.3 pt
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
64.2 pt
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 -1!
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
63.1 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
57.2 pt
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
28.1 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4315 (4271.27min - 4314.68max) MB/s +124%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1629 - 4861, n=76, last 2 years)
2970 MB/s +54%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
2596 (2570.79min - 2596.12max) MB/s +35%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
2565 (2469.49min - 2565.24max) MB/s +33%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2425 (2418.63min - 2424.52max) MB/s +26%
Average SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
  (1624 - 3679, n=5)
2242 MB/s +16%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
1930 (1920.36min - 1930.22max) MB/s
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
971 (897.79min - 971.46max) MB/s -50%
seq write
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4326 (4303.78min - 4326.21max) MB/s +173%
Average of class Multimedia
  (463 - 5711, n=76, last 2 years)
3092 MB/s +95%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2957 (2951.32min - 2957.19max) MB/s +87%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
2834 (2811.69min - 2833.67max) MB/s +79%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
2402 (2383.83min - 2401.68max) MB/s +52%
Average SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
  (1583 - 3838, n=5)
2354 MB/s +49%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
1583 (1538.61min - 1582.72max) MB/s
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
615 (599.58min - 615.49max) MB/s -61%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6701 (6057.41min - 6701.03max) MB/s +90%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2132 - 7126, n=76, last 2 years)
5486 MB/s +56%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
4959 (4547.18min - 4958.86max) MB/s +41%
Average SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
  (3269 - 6805, n=5)
4147 MB/s +18%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
3527 (3023.67min - 3526.78max) MB/s
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
3426 (2886.52min - 3425.91max) MB/s -3%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
3395 (2336.65min - 3395.42max) MB/s -4%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
2052 (1585.66min - 2052.48max) MB/s -42%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4955 (4937.74min - 4955.15max) MB/s +55%
Average of class Multimedia
  (555 - 6898, n=76, last 2 years)
4169 MB/s +30%
Average SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
  (3196 - 6133, n=5)
3823 MB/s +20%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
3196 MB/s
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
3107 (3014.92min - 3106.8max) MB/s -3%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2994 (2986.03min - 2994.1max) MB/s -6%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
2409 (2393.48min - 2409max) MB/s -25%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
805 (794.52min - 805.1max) MB/s -75%
4k q1 t1 read
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
94.2 (93.47min - 94.2max) MB/s +51%
Average SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
  (57.4 - 78.7, n=5)
64 MB/s +3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14.6 - 97.7, n=76, last 2 years)
62.9 MB/s +1%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
62.4 (61.86min - 62.42max) MB/s
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
54.5 (54.23min - 54.48max) MB/s -13%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
52.5 (46.87min - 52.48max) MB/s -16%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
46.3 (46.19min - 46.3max) MB/s -26%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
37.85 (37.25min - 37.85max) MB/s -39%
4k q1 t1 write
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
256 (252.87min - 256.05max) MB/s +79%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
247 (244.59min - 247.11max) MB/s +73%
Average of class Multimedia
  (69.4 - 378, n=76, last 2 years)
170.9 MB/s +20%
Average SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
  (128 - 173.8, n=5)
149 MB/s +4%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
143 (140.1min - 143.21max) MB/s
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
124 (123.62min - 124.21max) MB/s -13%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
119 (117.55min - 118.76max) MB/s -17%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
86.9 (75.28min - 86.91max) MB/s -39%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3297 (3266.49min - 3297.01max) MB/s +315%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
2263 (47.32min - 2263.44max) MB/s +185%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1897 (1895.38min - 1897.45max) MB/s +139%
Average SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
  (794 - 2447, n=5)
1752 MB/s +121%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
1635 (1546.79min - 1634.82max) MB/s +106%
Average of class Multimedia
  (295 - 4881, n=76, last 2 years)
1357 MB/s +71%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
794 (786.46min - 793.65max) MB/s
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
520 (281.17min - 519.78max) MB/s -35%
4k q32 t16 write
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2154 (2150min - 2154.41max) MB/s +434%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
2085 (107.27min - 2085.29max) MB/s +417%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
1447 (1219.34min - 1447.09max) MB/s +259%
Average SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
  (403 - 2073, n=5)
1366 MB/s +239%
Average of class Multimedia
  (192.1 - 4074, n=76, last 2 years)
1025 MB/s +154%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
964 (961.85min - 964.1max) MB/s +139%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
403 (396.1min - 402.54max) MB/s
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
273.6 (192.36min - 273.65max) MB/s -32%
AS SSD
Score Total
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
6095 Points +45%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5763 Points +37%
Average SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
  (4206 - 6729, n=5)
5678 Points +35%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
5231 Points +24%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
5069 Points +21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2033 - 9972, n=73, last 2 years)
5061 Points +20%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
4206 Points
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
2077 Points -51%
Score Read
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2920 Points +132%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2449 Points +95%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
2012 Points +60%
Average SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
  (1257 - 2309, n=5)
1838 Points +46%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
1780 Points +42%
Average of class Multimedia
  (669 - 3501, n=73, last 2 years)
1630 Points +30%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
1257 Points
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
839 Points -33%
Score Write
Average SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
  (2147 - 4410, n=5)
2937 Points +25%
Average of class Multimedia
  (656 - 4813, n=73, last 2 years)
2660 Points +14%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
2450 Points +5%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2410 Points +3%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
2343 Points
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
2214 Points -6%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1412 Points -40%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
859 Points -63%
Seq Read
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5367 MB/s +94%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1718 - 5730, n=73, last 2 years)
4248 MB/s +53%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
3845 MB/s +39%
Average SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
  (2432 - 5456, n=5)
3325 MB/s +20%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
3066 MB/s +11%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
3006 MB/s +9%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
2768 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
1707 MB/s -38%
Seq Write
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3955 MB/s +135%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2805 MB/s +67%
Average of class Multimedia
  (414 - 5651, n=73, last 2 years)
2749 MB/s +63%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
2559 MB/s +52%
Average SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
  (1266 - 3541, n=5)
2415 MB/s +43%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
2283 MB/s +36%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
1683 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
510 MB/s -70%
4K Read
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
83.6 MB/s +31%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
63.7 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (28.7 - 98.5, n=73, last 2 years)
61.6 MB/s -3%
Average SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
  (48.9 - 72.2, n=5)
59.2 MB/s -7%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
54.3 MB/s -15%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
49.8 MB/s -22%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
43.16 MB/s -32%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
38.77 MB/s -39%
4K Write
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
205.3 MB/s +7%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
191.1 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (66.5 - 328, n=73, last 2 years)
190.3 MB/s 0%
Average SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
  (128.4 - 237, n=5)
169.1 MB/s -12%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
119.7 MB/s -37%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
100.9 MB/s -47%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
100.7 MB/s -47%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
78.5 MB/s -59%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2300 MB/s +151%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2093 MB/s +128%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
1668 MB/s +82%
Average SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
  (917 - 1953, n=5)
1446 MB/s +58%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
1341 MB/s +46%
Average of class Multimedia
  (350 - 2989, n=73, last 2 years)
1144 MB/s +25%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
917 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
630 MB/s -31%
4K-64 Write
Average SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
  (1733 - 3818, n=5)
2526 MB/s +27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (411 - 4265, n=73, last 2 years)
2195 MB/s +11%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
2143 MB/s +8%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2009 MB/s +1%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
1983 MB/s
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
1847 MB/s -7%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
811 MB/s -59%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
707 MB/s -64%
Access Time Read
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
0.085 ms * -254%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.018 - 0.15, n=73, last 2 years)
0.0551 ms * -130%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
0.049 ms * -104%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
0.046 ms * -92%
Average SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
  (0.017 - 0.058, n=5)
0.035 ms * -46%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.024 ms * -0%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
0.024 ms *
Access Time Write
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
0.086 ms * -353%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.013 - 0.414, n=73, last 2 years)
0.06104 ms * -221%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
0.041 ms * -116%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
0.035 ms * -84%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
0.034 ms * -79%
Average SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
  (0.017 - 0.038, n=5)
0.0252 ms * -33%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.02 ms * -5%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
0.019 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

018036054072090010801260144016201800198021602340252027002880306032403420Tooltip

GPU性能 -GeForce RTX 3050 Ti,50W TGP

GPU-ZGeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU-ZGeForce RTX 3050 Ti

包括播放高分辨率视频在内的轻度工作负荷将主要由集成的Iris Xe Graphics G7处理器处理。专用的GeForce RTX 3050 Ti4GB GDDR6-VRAM,当你在游戏中需要更多性能时,例如,通过Nvidia的Optimus技术自动激活。它是TGP为50W,最大核心时钟为1455MHz的版本。有更快的RTX 3050 Ti版本(最高80W TGP),所以与我们数据库中该GPU的平均结果相比,基准测试结果稍低。与旧的GTX 1650 Max-QSurface Book 3然而,RTX 3050 Ti提供了明显的更多性能。

在持续的工作负荷下,GPU的性能是完全稳定的,苛刻的3DMarkTime Spy 压力测试也很容易通过,达到99.3%。在电池供电的情况下,GPU的功耗被限制在35W,这导致了大约20%的性能赤字(4893分与3944分@Time Spy Graphics)。更多的GPU基准测试可在 这里.

商业客户还可以获得带有以下功能的Surface Laptop StudioRTX A2000而不是RTX 3050 Ti,后者为专业应用提供特殊的驱动认证。然而,基本的性能水平与RTX 3050 Ti相似。

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
98.1 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 
65.2 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
65.2 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H
55.1 pt
SCHENKER Vision 14
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H
49 pt
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-1065G7
36.1 pt
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-1185G7
35.3 pt
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H
33.2 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
33833 Points +102%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3505 - 60250, n=77, last 2 years)
20075 Points +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7952 - 20905, n=27)
17562 Points +5%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H
16789 Points
SCHENKER Vision 14
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H
16128 Points -4%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-1185G7
11538 Points -31%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H
11287 Points -33%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-1065G7
10800 Points -36%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30158 - 102432, n=23)
67913 Points +41%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
62748 Points +31%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14679 - 130614, n=38, last 2 years)
56887 Points +18%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H
48053 Points
SCHENKER Vision 14
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H
35820 Points -25%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-1065G7
30555 Points -36%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-1185G7
29035 Points -40%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
23373 Points +101%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1835 - 46022, n=80, last 2 years)
14437 Points +24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7917 - 15611, n=26)
13090 Points +12%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H
11656 Points
SCHENKER Vision 14
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H
11055 Points -5%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H
8346 Points -28%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-1185G7
8114 Points -30%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-1065G7
7362 Points -37%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
9768 Points +100%
Average of class Multimedia
  (622 - 17620, n=81, last 2 years)
5446 Points +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (3744 - 6122, n=27)
5177 Points +6%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H
4893 Points
SCHENKER Vision 14
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H
4721 Points -4%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H
2993 Points -39%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-1185G7
2886 Points -41%
3DMark 11 Performance
15393 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
25704 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
10493 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
4987 points
Help

游戏性能

RTX 3050 Ti足够强大,可以在许多作品中实现高细节的流畅的1080p游戏,但你通常不会达到显示器的120 Hz。在较长的时间里,游戏性能再次得到稳定,但在电池电量方面的表现却有点低。然而,差异并不像合成测试中那么大。 Witcher 3 例如,Ultra在超过35帧的情况下仍然很流畅。请看我们的 技术部分了解更多游戏基准测试

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
164.2 (155min) fps +93%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.2 - 290, n=73, last 2 years)
100.8 fps +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30 - 110, n=26)
88.8 fps +4%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
85 fps
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
73 fps -14%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
61 (51min) fps -28%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
47.9 (43min) fps -44%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
41.5 fps -51%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
88.6 (79min) fps +113%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years)
54 fps +30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (19 - 58.5, n=29)
47.5 fps +14%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
41.6 (39min, 40P1) fps
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
41.4 (39min, 40P1) fps 0%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
35 (28min) fps -16%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
30.1 fps -28%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
25.3 (24min) fps -39%
F1 2021
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Multimedia
  (46 - 264, n=16, last 2 years)
153.7 fps +49%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (68 - 131, n=11)
104.8 fps +2%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
103 (70min, 55P1) fps
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
97.1 (63min, 56P1) fps -6%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Multimedia
  (31.5 - 149.8, n=15, last 2 years)
90.1 fps +97%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (44.4 - 69, n=11)
54 fps +18%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
46.8 (38min, 37P1) fps +2%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
45.8 (37min, 32P1) fps
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
105 (84min) fps +40%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
75 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (36 - 94, n=14)
73.6 fps -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (18 - 154, n=58, last 2 years)
73.2 fps -2%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
64 fps -15%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
42 (36min) fps -44%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
99 (74min) fps +41%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
70 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (17 - 145, n=58, last 2 years)
68.6 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30 - 89, n=14)
68.4 fps -2%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
59 fps -16%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
39 (34min) fps -44%
Strange Brigade
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
163 (43.5min, 114P1) fps +69%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (79.2 - 117.3, n=23)
103.3 fps +7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (12.8 - 244, n=78, last 2 years)
100.7 fps +5%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
96.2 (60.8min, 72.7P1) fps
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
89.4 (64.6min, 67.3P1) fps -7%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
54.9 (40.1min, 41.6P1) fps -43%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
154 (36.9min, 111P1) fps +87%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (34.8 - 101.3, n=25)
87.5 fps +6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11 - 233, n=80, last 2 years)
87.4 fps +6%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
82.3 (55.4min, 61.3P1) fps
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
76.7 (54min, 57.9P1) fps -7%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
47.9 (35.1min, 36.4P1) fps -42%
GTA V
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
132 (13.8min, 90.9P1) fps +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (53.8 - 149, n=25)
117.4 fps +6%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
111 (31.6min, 76.9P1) fps
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
104 (8.49min, 71.4P1) fps -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.9 - 186.1, n=81, last 2 years)
96.7 fps -13%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
73.2 (26.1min, 52.6P1) fps -34%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
79.6 (10.1min, 55.6P1) fps +26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (27.8 - 75.6, n=26)
63.3 fps 0%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
63.2 (10min, 41.7P1) fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.09 - 126.3, n=80, last 2 years)
53.5 fps -15%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
52.2 (9.58min, 29.4P1) fps -17%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
37.1 (14.7min, 25P1) fps -41%
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (74.8 - 154, n=27)
119.9 fps +4%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
117 (101.4min) fps +2%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
115 (100min) fps
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
113 (96.3min) fps -2%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
112 (97min) fps -3%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
111 (96.6min) fps -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (28 - 196.9, n=82, last 2 years)
103.8 fps -10%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
81.6 (70.9min) fps -29%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
113 (95.5min) fps +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (67.3 - 145, n=27)
113 fps +2%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
111 (96.1min) fps
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
107 (92.7min) fps -4%
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
104 (90.5min) fps -6%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
103 (84.6min) fps -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (26.3 - 179.9, n=82, last 2 years)
96.4 fps -13%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
68.3 (57.8min) fps -38%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
114 fps +79%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (33.4 - 106, n=24)
70 fps +10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9.75 - 162.4, n=78, last 2 years)
66.5 fps +4%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
63.8 fps
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
58.3 fps -9%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
38.3 fps -40%
1920x1080 High Quality
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
88 fps +96%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (23.5 - 106, n=24)
51.2 fps +14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.53 - 141.8, n=81, last 2 years)
50.9 fps +13%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
45 fps
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
40.8 fps -9%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
26.1 fps -42%
CPU和GPU数据Witcher 3 Ultra
CPU和GPU数据Witcher 3 Ultra

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0510152025303540Tooltip
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø41.6 (39-44)
lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 170 163 111 63.2
The Witcher 3 (2015) 212 145 85 41.6
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 137 121 115 111
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 101 63.8 45
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 101 89.8 75.2
Far Cry 5 (2018) 117 81 75 70
Strange Brigade (2018) 256 119 96.2 82.3
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 102 78 60 49
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) 178 77 52 37
Borderlands 3 (2019) 97 76 55 45
F1 2021 (2021) 224 136 103 45.8
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) 62 60 42 40

排放--表面往往是无声的

系统噪音

微软使用了两个位于基本单元前面区域的风扇。总的来说,风扇的外形非常具有防御性,风扇的速度在负载下会慢慢增加。这意味着当你执行基本任务时,设备通常非常安静,或者风扇的杂音会非常小。也没有恼人的电子声音,例如线圈啸叫。在游戏过程中,几分钟后风扇噪音会达到45 dB(A)左右,这绝对是可以听到的,我们也建议在游戏中使用耳机。

Noise Level

Idle
24.7 / 24.7 / 24.7 dB(A)
Load
33.2 / 46.7 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.7 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.432.631.73133.731.92530.133.429.731.329.833.93130.627.526.526.723.830.34032.430.529.128.630.335.4502931.426.526.329.131.36326.929.22824.126.828.48027.124.923.622.422.829.810032.824.72020.420.232.112536.330.621.921.620.338.416025.324.821.320.120.125.520024.926.822.620.318.225.525025.828.822.121.419.625.431526.627.520.720.117.224.840027.129.119.318.615.427.850026.928.11818.712.928.363029.331.220.421.213.23080028.530.419.320.311.630.4100030.531.920.220.81232.9125031.93420.220.311.434.4160034.535.621.522.211.435.6200035.837.822.523.711.237.5250035.838.622.823.811.536.5315034.536.722.523.111.835.3400033.336.221.322.212.234.6500030.83317.718.512.233.6630028.330.916.317.212.431800026.127.612.913.112.530.81000022.724.612.612.612.528.51250017.920.812.612.712.423.51600014.916.812.11211.916.5SPL44.546.732.533.224.746.1N4.65.31.61.70.65.3median 28.5median 30.4median 20.2median 20.3median 12.4median 30.8Delta3.942.72.42.44.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMicrosoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-1065G7, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
SCHENKER Vision 14
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i7-1185G7, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
Noise
-3%
7%
-2%
-5%
-2%
-8%
off / environment *
24.7
25
-1%
24.8
-0%
30.2
-22%
24.3
2%
25.1
-2%
23.9
3%
Idle Minimum *
24.7
25
-1%
24.8
-0%
30.2
-22%
24.3
2%
25.2
-2%
24.2
2%
Idle Average *
24.7
25
-1%
24.8
-0%
30.2
-22%
24.3
2%
25.2
-2%
24.2
2%
Idle Maximum *
24.7
31.5
-28%
24.8
-0%
30.2
-22%
25.9
-5%
25.2
-2%
24.2
2%
Load Average *
33.2
36.7
-11%
27.8
16%
32.4
2%
43.3
-30%
31
7%
50.2
-51%
Witcher 3 ultra *
44.5
43.2
3%
27.8
38%
25.2
43%
44.6
-0%
44
1%
47
-6%
Load Maximum *
46.7
36.7
21%
49.5
-6%
33.6
28%
49.5
-6%
51.7
-11%
51.7
-11%

* ... smaller is better

温度

暖气是在两侧的前部区域散开的。
暖气是在两侧的前部区域散开的。

虽然我们不能看机箱内部,但微软的新闻图片给了我们一个很好的概述,并显示了一个相当非传统的方法。处理器位于基本单元的右上方,但两个风扇位于底部角落。这意味着热空气是在机箱的前侧区域散去的,当你使用外部鼠标时,这一点肯定是明显的。与更传统的冷却系统相比,掌托的温度也高得多。

微软通过这种冷却解决方案很好地控制了表面温度,我们只能确定有几个地方的温度超过40℃,即使在压力测试中也是如此。我们认为,在温度稍高的情况下,风扇速度可以更低一点。在轻度工作负荷下,机箱几乎没有升温。

在压力测试中,CPU和GPU的行为相当有趣。在最初的10分钟内,GPU的工作功率为40W,在CPU从30W降到23W后才跳到50W。然而,GPU不能保持这一数值,在测试过程中又略有下降。在综合工作负载中,Surface笔记本电脑工作室通常偏向于GPU,这是有道理的,特别是当你玩游戏的时候。在压力测试后,我们并没有立即注意到任何性能上的不足。

CPU和GPU数据压力测试
CPU和GPU数据压力测试
Max. Load
 36.7 °C41.1 °C42.2 °C 
 37 °C40.5 °C42.3 °C 
 33.3 °C30.8 °C35.7 °C 
Maximum: 42.3 °C
Average: 37.7 °C
36 °C36.4 °C31.2 °C
36.1 °C36.4 °C33.2 °C
38.2 °C35.3 °C33.1 °C
Maximum: 38.2 °C
Average: 35.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  39.1 °C | Room Temperature 20.1 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.7 °C / 96.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-6.9 °C / -12.5 F).
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(底)。
表面温度应力测试(底)。
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Heat
-10%
-6%
-13%
-29%
-40%
-42%
Maximum Upper Side *
42.3
46
-9%
46.8
-11%
41
3%
49.7
-17%
45
-6%
49.4
-17%
Maximum Bottom *
38.2
46
-20%
40.9
-7%
43.7
-14%
56
-47%
44.4
-16%
60.6
-59%
Idle Upper Side *
23.4
24.4
-4%
24.2
-3%
29.2
-25%
28.8
-23%
40.2
-72%
30.6
-31%
Idle Bottom *
23.5
24.8
-6%
24.2
-3%
27.6
-17%
30.6
-30%
39.2
-67%
37.4
-59%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

微软使用了一个四扬声器系统,你可以在我们包含在维护部分的新闻图片上清楚地看到它们。扬声器的质量非常好,它们甚至创造了一种空间效果。根据我们的分析,低音有点低于平均水平,而MacBook Pro 14在这方面总体上要好一点,但Surface Laptop Studio绝对不必躲在对手后面。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.734.82529.837.73123.834.14030.333.65029.135.86326.837.58022.840.810020.246.212520.349.116020.152.920018.258.725019.662.131517.265.240015.467.750012.969.763013.271.380011.671.410001272.7125011.472160011.473200011.272.8250011.572.7315011.869.4400012.268.3500012.268.2630012.468.1800012.570.61000012.568.21250012.463.71600011.955.8SPL24.782.9N0.658.6median 12.4median 68.2Delta2.45.430.235.431.734.925.834.932.236.927.535.924.544.323.154.723.365.121.966.320.164.521.566.818.869.817.671.914.972.613.770.91473.611.273.711.171.610.772.312.272.411.273.511.674.511.775.7127312.273.812.469.712.568.212.667.112.563.911.968.524.884.90.668.3median 12.5median 71.62.42.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMicrosoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 TiApple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理 - 运行时间比宣传的短得多

消耗功率

102W电源适配器
102W电源适配器

我们的空闲测量值非常低,尽管有高分辨率和良好的亮度,所以Surface Laptop Studio是这里最高效的设备。然而,微软应该再看看待机功耗,2.6W的功耗实在是太高了。在游戏过程中,你可以期待80W左右,我们在压力测试中记录到97W,很快就平息到92W。因此,附带的102W电源适配器,提供一个额外的USB-A端口用于充电,是完全足够的。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 2.6 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2.6 / 7.1 / 7.9 Watt
Load midlight 76.8 / 97.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N, IPS, 2400x1600, 14.4"
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14"
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2"
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.5"
SCHENKER Vision 14
i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 14"
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162, IPS, 3840x2160, 14"
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
-158%
-5%
-29%
-59%
-129%
-100%
-95%
-61%
Idle Minimum *
2.6
18.6
-615%
2.9
-12%
4.8
-85%
6.7
-158%
9.4
-262%
9.9
-281%
8.2 ?(2.6 - 23, n=25)
-215%
Idle Average *
7.1
20.6
-190%
11.6
-63%
9.4
-32%
12.6
-77%
15.8
-123%
17.4
-145%
12.6 ?(6.5 - 25, n=25)
-77%
Idle Maximum *
7.9
22.6
-186%
11.9
-51%
11.2
-42%
15.4
-95%
24.1
-205%
22.5
-185%
17.2 ?(7.9 - 30, n=25)
-118%
Load Average *
76.8
66
14%
49.5
36%
72
6%
85.7
-12%
76.8
-0%
85.6
-11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
83
67
19%
58.2
30%
83
-0%
154
-86%
70.9
15%
Load Maximum *
97.3
86
12%
68.5
30%
90
8%
110.9
-14%
189.7
-95%
91.1
6%
139.1 ?(63 - 195, n=25)
-43%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø83 (81.5-95.3)
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø92.7 (82.5-97.4)

Power Consumption external screen

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø59 (49.7-85.6)
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø71.7 (67.8-77.5)
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø68.3 (66.4-71.5)
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø80.3 (78.7-83.8)

电池运行时间

充电
充电

微软宣传说,在150尼特的亮度水平和典型的Surface使用情况下,58WH电池的运行时间可达18小时,但这些测试也包括待机时间。我们的连续使用测试也是在150尼特(在这种情况下是最大亮度的62%)下进行的,结果要短得多。视频播放可能超过12小时,但我们的Wi-Fi测试只运行了8小时,当我们在最大显示亮度下重复测试时只有6小时。这些结果在对比组中并不差,只有Apple的MacBook Pro 14有一个优势。

当设备开启时,电池充满电需要两个多小时,37分钟后可获得50%的容量。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 98)
8h 00min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 98)
5h 59min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 19min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 00min
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 58 Wh
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-7513
i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, 56 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, 69.9 Wh
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 69 Wh
SCHENKER Vision 14
i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 53 Wh
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 62 Wh
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
i7-1185G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, 52 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
12%
36%
98%
-11%
12%
-24%
35%
H.264
739
645
-13%
900
22%
405
-45%
WiFi v1.3
480
506
5%
816
70%
396
-17%
327
-32%
439
-9%
271
-44%
Load
60
87
45%
69
15%
188
213%
86
43%
79
32%
58
-3%
Reader / Idle
991
828
396

Pros

+ 高质量的机箱,创新的显示器铰链
+ 良好的120赫兹显示
+ 雷电4
+ 舒适的键盘
+ 良好的系统性能
+ 非常好的扬声器

Cons

- 没有维护选项
- 相对较慢的处理器
- 只有一年的保修期
- 没有读卡器

结论--Surface Laptop Studio不是 "专业"。

在审查中。微软Surface Laptop Studio。测试模型由数码港提供。
在审查中。微软Surface Laptop Studio。测试模型由数码港提供。

新的Surface Laptop Studio带有可折叠显示屏,应该是为了取代旧的笔记本而在我们的审查之后,总体印象是好的。构建质量和材料都是一流的,两个组件的性能利用是稳固的,而且该设备在显示屏或扬声器方面也没有显示任何重大缺陷。折叠机制也给人留下了卖座的印象,但它在多年后的表现如何,还有待观察。所谓的演示模式也不理想,因为它覆盖了整个键盘。

我们对CPU的选择感到惊讶。英特尔的Tiger Lake 四核当然可以为日常任务提供足够的性能,但是AMD和Apple 的当前一代移动芯片已经更快,而且新的型号将在未来几周内推出。带有更快的iGPU的酷睿i5对于入门级SKU来说更有意义一些,但是当你把它与GeForce RTX 3050 Ti这样的专用GPU结合起来时,你就不能利用更快的iGPU。H45处理器将需要一个不同的主板,因此需要更多的开发成本,但性能会有竞争力。

新的Surface Laptop Studio是一个有趣的产品,是你日常工作的好伙伴,但是英特尔四核处理器的CPU性能令人失望,特别是考虑到高昂的价格,所以你为旧技术支付了很多钱。微软还说该设备是为专业用户设计的,但我们认为Surface Laptop Studio不符合这一说法。我们强烈建议尽快推出采用英特尔新的Alder Lake CPU的更新机型。

显然,你总是可以推荐新机型,特别是在移动领域,但是新的Alder Lake CPU在CPU性能方面是我们多年来没有看到的一大进步。微软应该迅速推出Surface Laptop Studio的更新型号,因为该设备与缓慢的Tiger Lake 四核几乎没有竞争力。显示屏相当不错,但我们感到惊讶的是,它再一次只覆盖了小的sRGB色域,而竞争对手主要关注更广泛的P3色彩空间。我们也不理解完全缺乏维护选项(你甚至不能清洁风扇)。

新的Surface Laptop Studio几乎提供了你从普通Surface笔记本电脑得到的东西,但功能更多一些。一个适合日常工作负荷的好设备。问题是价格太高,我们认为这里有很多未使用的潜力。Apple'sMacBook Pro 14在某些方面更胜一筹,而且处于相同的价格范围。同样的硬件设备也可用于更便宜的系统,如Schenker的Vision 14,而Razer Blade 14配备Ryzen CPU和RTX 3070 GPU,显示了14英寸系统的性能潜力。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

我们的审查配置目前在百思买的售价为 2499美元(库存),而配备Core i5和iGPU(16GB内存和256GB固态硬盘)的入门级型号已经,起价1399美元。.

Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti - 03/08/2022 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
81 / 98 → 82%
Keyboard
86%
Pointing Device
90%
Connectivity
57 / 80 → 71%
Weight
65 / 20-72 → 87%
Battery
84 / 95 → 89%
Display
90%
Games Performance
90 / 90 → 99%
Application Performance
92 / 90 → 100%
Temperature
90%
Noise
91 / 95 → 95%
Audio
91%
Camera
36 / 85 → 42%
Average
80%
89%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 微软Surface Laptop Studio评论。有趣的概念与缓慢的英特尔CPU
Andreas Osthoff, 2022-03- 9 (Update: 2024-11- 4)