微软 Surface Pro IPS Copilot+ 评测--基本机型配备 IPS 显示屏和骁龙 X Plus

Name: Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+
Brand: Microsoft

性价比明显更高。新款 Surface Pro 11 的基本型号采用了 IPS 显示屏和据称速度较慢的骁龙 X Plus 处理器。实际上，你并不会注意到性能的降低，但由于使用的是 ARM 版本的 Windows 操作系统，一些限制因素依然存在。
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 08/14/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
AI Convertible / 2-in-1 MS Surface Snapdragon X Series Wi-Fi 7 Touchscreen

我们已经对配备 OLED 面板的全新 Surface Pro 11 进行了广泛评测，现在我们来看看配备速度较慢的高通骁龙 X Plus 处理器和 IPS 触摸屏。微软对基本机型的收费约为 1,000 美元，虽然配备了 16 GB 内存，但只有一个小的 256 GB SSD。如果要升级到 512 GB 固态硬盘，需要再向微软支付 250 美元，但你也可以自己轻松升级固态硬盘。

在机箱、端口、Wi-Fi 性能、网络摄像头或扬声器方面，与已评测过的高端机型骁龙 X 精英版和 OLED 面板相比，在机箱、端口、Wi-Fi 性能、网络摄像头或扬声器方面都没有任何区别，这就是为什么我们要向你推荐我们的评论了解有关这些主题的详细信息。在本文中，我们将集中讨论 IPS 显示屏和性能较弱的骁龙 X Plus，以及它对废气排放的影响。

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Surface Pro Copilot+ Best Performance (Surface Pro Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 10 x - 3.4 GHz, Oryon

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

Memory

16 GB

, LPDDR5x-8448, Dual-Channel, onboard

Display

13.00 inch 3:2, 2880 x 1920 pixel 266 PPI, capacitive, LP129WT342166, IPS, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ, 256 GB

, 185 GB free

Connections

4 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, 1 Docking Station Port, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Qualcomm FastConnect 7800 (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 9.3 x 287 x 209

Battery

47 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: Quad-HD+ 10M Wide Angle + IR
Primary Camera: 12.2 MPix
Secondary Camera: 9 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

872 g, Power Supply: 213 g

Price

1199 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Version	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
80.7 %	v8	08/2024	Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	872 g	9.3 mm	13.00"	2880x1920
82.5 %	v8	07/2024	Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	870 g	9.3 mm	13.00"	2880x1920
85.7 %	v7 ^(old)	04/2024	Minisforum V3 R7 8840U, Radeon 780M	928 g	9.8 mm	14.00"	2560x1600
80.1 %	v8	06/2024	Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	1.7 kg	18.9 mm	14.00"	1920x1200
87 %	v7 ^(old)	04/2024	Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	1.4 kg	15.95 mm	13.30"	2880x1800
87.4 %	v7 ^(old)	05/2024	Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	1.6 kg	18.5 mm	14.00"	1920x1200

注：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息此处.

外壳和功能

正如我们已经提到的，入门级机型和 OLED 机型在外壳和功能设置方面基本上没有区别。 OLED 版本.不过，IPS 机型的电池容量为 47 Wh，略小于 OLED 机型的 53 Wh。由于重量仅相差 2 克，这意味着 IPS 面板肯定要重一些。

尺寸比较

Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Minisforum V3 Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ DIN A4 ❌

显示屏 - 600 cd/m² IPS 触摸屏

Surface Pro 各款机型之间最大的不同其实是屏幕。基本型号配备的不是 OLED 面板，而是 IPS 触摸屏。分辨率（2,880 x 1,920 像素）、SDR 亮度（600 尼特）和刷新率（120 赫兹）完全相同。当然，在主观画质方面，两种面板还是有区别的。毫无疑问，OLED 型号的色彩更鲜艳，黑色更深邃（因此对比度更高），而且在 HDR 内容方面也有更大的优势。不过，IPS 面板也不失为一个好的选择，从主观角度来看，它也能提供良好的图像质量，只是黑阶略高。但最大的优点是没有 PWM 闪烁。亮度和色温都可以通过传感器自动调节。

我们可以确认标称的 600 cd/m² 亮度，但这只是在一个区域。平均亮度为 575 cd/m²，再加上 0.56 cd/m² 的高黑阶，对比度仅略高于 1.000:1。这对于日常使用来说已经足够好了，但你很难将其称为出色的对比度。在全亮度状态下，会有轻微的光渗出，虽然响应时间不是特别快，但高刷新率意味着运动非常流畅，而且我们面对的是一台并非为游戏而设计的机器。


615 cd/m²	555 cd/m²	550 cd/m²
595 cd/m²	585 cd/m²	551 cd/m²
580 cd/m²	585 cd/m²	553 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LP129WT342166 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 615 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 574.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 585 cd/m²
Contrast: 1045:1 (Black: 0.56 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
79.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18

	Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ LP129WT342166, IPS, 2880x1920, 13"	Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ ATNA30DW01-1, OLED, 2880x1920, 13"	Minisforum V3 BOE, NE140QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 14"	Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AU Optronics B14UAT, IPS, 1920x1200, 14"	Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 SDC ATNA33AA02-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3"	Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML LEN140WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 14"
Display		11%	8%	-52%	14%	-7%
Display P3 Coverage	83.4	98.9 19%	97.7 17%	35.7 -57%	99.7 20%	71.6 -14%
sRGB Coverage	99.7	99.4 0%	99.8 0%	53.6 -46%	100 0%	100 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	79.4	89.5 13%	85.4 8%	36.9 -54%	97 22%	73.4 -8%
Response Times		98%	66%	27%	92%	14%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	39.6 ?(18.1, 21.5)	0.32 ?(0.17, 0.15) 99%	10 ?(3, 7) 75%	23 ?(10.7, 12.3) 42%	1.88 ?(1, 0.88) 95%	28.8 ?(13.9, 14.9) 27%
Response Time Black / White *	18 ?(7, 11)	0.58 ?(0.29, 0.29) 97%	8 ?(3, 5) 56%	15.8 ?(9.1, 6.7) 12%	2.1 ?(0.9, 1.2) 88%	18 ?(8.9, 9.1) -0%
PWM Frequency		480 ?(69)			60 ?(100)
Screen		192%	-61%	-104%	-83%	-60%
Brightness middle	585	580 -1%	512 -12%	267.6 -54%	362.6 -38%	302.7 -48%
Brightness	574	581 1%	495 -14%	240 -58%	368 -36%	293 -49%
Brightness Distribution	89	99 11%	91 2%	84 -6%	97 9%	88 -1%
Black Level *	0.56	0.04 93%	0.48 14%	0.31 45%		0.35 37%
Contrast	1045	14500 1288%	1067 2%	863 -17%		865 -17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.3	0.7 46%	4.32 -232%	4.67 -259%	4.66 -258%	3.45 -165%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3	2.1 30%	7.04 -135%	17.52 -484%	7.25 -142%	6.04 -101%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2	0.6 70%	4.22 -111%	2 -0%	2.6 -30%	4.7 -135%
Gamma	2.18 ^101%	2.16 ^102%	2.31 ^95%	2.15 ^102%	2.2 ^100%	2.1 ^105%
CCT	6914 ^94%	6484 ^100%	6770 ^96%	6585 ^99%	6055 ^107%	5804 ^112%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *			4.17	2.49	0.56	0.47
Total Average (Program / Settings)		100% / 136%	4% / -25%	-43% / -72%	8% / -25%	-18% / -36%

* ... smaller is better

另外一个区别是色彩空间覆盖率。微软没有提供任何细节，虽然两种显示屏都拥有相同的 sRGB 和Vivid色彩配置文件，但 IPS 面板只能完全覆盖 sRGB 色彩空间，P3 仅为 83%。因此，你无法使用Vivid配置文件做太多事情，因为与 sRGB 参考相比，色彩偏差非常大。不过，在我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件进行分析时，sRGB 配置文件给人留下了很好的印象，其中最突出的一点就是色彩偏差小。尽管如此，色温还是略微偏冷。由于我们的软件（i1 Profiler）目前无法在 ARM 版本的 Windows 系统上运行，因此我们无法对面板进行正确校准。

CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：Vivid，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18.1 ms rise
39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21.5 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17271 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Surface Pro 的屏幕非常光亮，即使在室内也很容易产生恼人的反光。高亮度在一定程度上有所帮助，但在晴天或非常明亮的日子里，仍然很难在户外舒适地工作。IPS 面板具有出色的视角稳定性。

性能 - 骁龙 X Plus 和快速内存

Surface Pro Copilot+ 的基本型号配备了骁龙 X Plus 处理器和 16GB 内存（LPDDR5x 8448），但内存不能升级。

测试条件

微软没有提供任何额外的能源配置文件，相反，你只能在设置中更改能源状态。与通常的 Surface 设备一样，在命名方面（与其他 Windows 笔记本电脑相比）略有不同，但大致相同。我们使用 "最佳性能 "模式进行了以下基准测试和测量，但也提供了 "更佳性能 "和" 推荐 "模式（与其他 Windows 笔记本电脑的 "平衡 "和"最佳 能效 "模式相对应）。没有官方的 TDP 数据，但消耗值与配备 Snapdragon X Elite 的 OLED 机型相对应，我们假设为 23-30 瓦。

处理器 - Snaprdragon X1P-64-100

Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 是目前高通公司速度最慢的 Snapdragon X 处理器。与 Elite 芯片不同，它只提供 10 个而不是 12 个 CPU 内核，时钟频率为 3.4 GHz。同样，骁龙 X Plus 也没有双核涡轮增压技术。这意味着该芯片落后于 OLED 型号 X1E-80-100，尤其是在单核测试中。不过，总的来说，性能还是非常不错的，在日常情况下你不会注意到机型之间的差异。在下表中，只有前两项基准测试（CB 2024 和 Geekbench 6）是在 Surface Pro 上进行的。其他所有基准都是通过模拟运行的，这对性能造成了一定的影响。

不过，多核性能并不能维持太久。在 Cinebench R15 循环中，结果迅速下降，当我们查看 CB24 Multi 运行期间的 CPU 速度时，可以看到芯片最高 3.4 GHz 的频率仅持续了约 20 秒，然后稳定在 2.5-2.6 GHz。要达到完全的多核性能，即使是骁龙 X Plus 也需要更强大的散热系统。在电池模式下，性能保持不变。其他 CPU 基准测试这里.

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100: Ø1433 (1369.72-1988.86)

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100: Ø1696 (1626.02-2248.71)

Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U: Ø2038 (2014.3-2051.07)

Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS: Ø1718 (1669.1-1933.67)

Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U: Ø1322 (1278.32-1504.72)

Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U: Ø1366 (1325.21-1680.04)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 ^-2! AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	83.9 pt
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	82.5 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	73 pt
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 ^-2! Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	67.8 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML ^-2! Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	66.1 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	62.8 pt
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	62.8 pt
Average of class Tablet	47.5 pt

Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	893 Points +12%
Average of class Tablet (795 - 893, n=2, last 2 years)	844 Points +6%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	795 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	795 Points 0%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	748 Points -6%

Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	123 Points +13%
Average of class Tablet (109 - 123, n=2, last 2 years)	116 Points +6%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	109 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	109 Points 0%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	98 Points -10%

Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	14458 Points +9%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	13278 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	13278 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	11327 Points -15%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	11144 Points -16%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	9448 Points -29%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	8487 Points -36%
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=62, last 2 years)	3334 Points -75%

Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	2845 Points +16%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	2592 Points +6%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	2537 Points +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	2445 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	2445 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	2324 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	2163 Points -12%
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=62, last 2 years)	1040 Points -57%

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	12972 Points +50%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	12720 (10900.4^min - 12720.4^max) Points +47%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	9927 Points +15%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	9574 (8804.18^min - 9574.36^max) Points +11%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	9385 (8670.97^min - 9384.63^max) Points +9%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	8644 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	8644 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (3066 - 9927, n=5, last 2 years)	6650 Points -23%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	1737 Points +54%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	1701 Points +51%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	1675 Points +48%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	1573 Points +39%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	1321 Points +17%
Average of class Tablet (559 - 1559, n=5, last 2 years)	1141 Points +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	1129 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	1129 Points 0%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	5067 Points +56%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	4854 Points +49%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	3760 Points +16%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	3640 Points +12%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	3613 Points +11%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	3252 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	3252 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (1175 - 3640, n=5, last 2 years)	2463 Points -24%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	681 Points +62%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	665 Points +58%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	646 Points +54%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	592 Points +41%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	490 Points +17%
Average of class Tablet (205 - 596, n=5, last 2 years)	430 Points +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	420 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	420 Points 0%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	2249 (1626.02^min - 2248.71^max) Points +13%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	2024 Points +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	1989 (1369.72^min - 1988.86^max) Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	1989 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	1934 (1669.1^min - 1933.67^max) Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	1680 (1325.21^min - 1680.04^max) Points -16%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	1505 (1278.32^min - 1504.72^max) Points -24%
Average of class Tablet (433 - 2249, n=5, last 2 years)	1327 Points -33%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	270 Points +29%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	263 Points +26%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	248 Points +19%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	230 Points +10%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	228 Points +9%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	209 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	209 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (119 - 248, n=5, last 2 years)	184.4 Points -12%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Tablet (351 - 1080, n=5, last 2 years)	649 Seconds * -61%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	402 Seconds *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	402 Seconds * -0%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	353 Seconds * +12%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	351 Seconds * +13%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	349 Seconds * +13%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	239 Seconds * +41%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	232 Seconds * +42%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	60670 MIPS +63%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	57795 MIPS +55%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	44404 MIPS +19%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	39025 MIPS +5%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	38645 MIPS +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	37289 MIPS
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	37289 MIPS 0%
Average of class Tablet (12470 - 44404, n=5, last 2 years)	29850 MIPS -20%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	6493 MIPS +40%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	5921 MIPS +27%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	5359 MIPS +15%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	4855 MIPS +4%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	4659 MIPS 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	4652 MIPS
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	4652 MIPS 0%
Average of class Tablet (3915 - 5359, n=5, last 2 years)	4468 MIPS -4%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	16.5 fps +152%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	14.6 fps +123%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	10.7 fps +64%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	10.6 fps +62%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	6.84 fps +5%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	6.54 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	6.54 fps 0%
Average of class Tablet (2.68 - 9.13, n=5, last 2 years)	5.76 fps -12%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Tablet (51.9 - 117.6, n=5, last 2 years)	68.5 s * -17%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	58.3 s *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	58.3 s * -0%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	52.5 s * +10%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	51.9 s * +11%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	47.1 s * +19%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	46.7 s * +20%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	44.3 s * +24%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	0.738 sec *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	0.738 sec * -0%
Average of class Tablet (0.532 - 1.012, n=5, last 2 years)	0.72 sec * +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	0.642 sec * +13%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	0.526 sec * +29%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	0.508 sec * +31%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	0.479 sec * +35%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	0.439 sec * +41%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

2661

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

17854

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

8454

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

21.25 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

2.18 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1989 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

24.8 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

209 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	95.9 pt
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	95.2 pt
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	54.6 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	50.9 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	50.6 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	45.2 pt
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	45.2 pt
Average of class Tablet	36.6 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	21489 KRay/s +181%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	20723 KRay/s +171%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	8380 KRay/s +10%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	8239 KRay/s +8%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	7637 KRay/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	7637 KRay/s 0%
Average of class Tablet (2184 - 7637, n=5, last 2 years)	4306 KRay/s -44%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	2184 KRay/s -71%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	90007 Points +1593%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	87120 Points +1539%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	41991 Points +690%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	41650 Points +684%
Average of class Tablet (5315 - 35296, n=5, last 2 years)	14851 Points +179%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	5687 Points +7%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	5315 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	5315 Points 0%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	3999 MB/s +140%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	3896 MB/s +134%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	2607 MB/s +56%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	2252 MB/s +35%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	2219 MB/s +33%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	1668 MB/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	1668 MB/s 0%
Average of class Tablet (785 - 2607, n=5, last 2 years)	1593 MB/s -4%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	103719 Points +63%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	95165 Points +50%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	69762 Points +10%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	63513 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	63513 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (27210 - 69762, n=5, last 2 years)	48076 Points -24%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	47142 Points -26%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	44936 Points -29%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	13441 Points +583%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	13143 Points +567%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	5540 Points +181%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	5481 Points +178%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	2357 Points +20%
Average of class Tablet (1161 - 3974, n=5, last 2 years)	2346 Points +19%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	1969 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	1969 Points 0%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	48197 Points +269%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	45793 Points +251%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	21082 Points +62%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	20640 Points +58%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	15669 Points +20%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	13050 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	13050 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (6842 - 16614, n=5, last 2 years)	11852 Points -9%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	71089 MB/s +21%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	70017 MB/s +19%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	60328 MB/s +3%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	58675 MB/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	58675 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	45243 MB/s -23%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	44193 MB/s -25%
Average of class Tablet (1275 - 71089, n=5, last 2 years)	39096 MB/s -33%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	892 MB/s +32%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	869 MB/s +28%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	802 MB/s +18%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	776 MB/s +14%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	678 MB/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	678 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	657 MB/s -3%
Average of class Tablet (229 - 802, n=5, last 2 years)	531 MB/s -22%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	11203 KRay/s +296%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	10812 KRay/s +283%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	4305 KRay/s +52%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	4195 KRay/s +48%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	3392 KRay/s +20%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	2826 KRay/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	2826 KRay/s 0%
Average of class Tablet (1127 - 3718, n=5, last 2 years)	2498 KRay/s -12%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	44831 MPixel/s +22%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	38707 MPixel/s +6%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	37635 MPixel/s +3%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	36689 MPixel/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	36689 MPixel/s 0%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	33411 MPixel/s -9%
Average of class Tablet (14660 - 38707, n=5, last 2 years)	28957 MPixel/s -21%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	24082 MPixel/s -34%

系统性能

就像 Surface Pro 更昂贵的 OLED 机型一样，基本款在处理日常任务时也非常灵敏。因此，我们在系统稳定性方面没有遇到任何问题，但并不是每个应用程序都能运行。如果你不仅打算使用日常应用程序（办公、浏览器、视频流等），就应该事先做一些研究，以免出现令人讨厌的意外。此外，需要自带驱动程序的外围设备也可能出现兼容性问题。

CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total

CrossMark / Overall
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	1681 Points +38%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1566 Points +29%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 155U	1467 Points +21%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1443 Points +19%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	1363 Points +12%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	1216 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ()	1216 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=65, last 2 years)	757 Points -38%

CrossMark / Productivity
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	1638 Points +46%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1520 Points +35%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 155U	1443 Points +28%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1375 Points +22%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	1354 Points +20%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	1124 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ()	1124 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (185 - 1797, n=65, last 2 years)	778 Points -31%

CrossMark / Creativity
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	1863 Points +35%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1726 Points +25%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 155U	1566 Points +13%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1529 Points +11%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	1433 Points +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	1381 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ()	1381 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (151 - 2350, n=65, last 2 years)	750 Points -46%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1401 Points +33%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	1334 Points +27%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1280 Points +22%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 155U	1266 Points +20%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	1199 Points +14%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	1052 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ()	1052 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (205 - 1401, n=65, last 2 years)	760 Points -28%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	435 Points +9%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	399 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ()	399 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	308 Points -23%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	302 Points -24%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 155U	272 Points -32%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	251 Points -37%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=51, last 2 years)	151 Points -62%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	295 Points +15%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	257 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	256 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ()	256 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 155U	250 Points -2%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	248 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	231 Points -10%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=71, last 2 years)	101.1 Points -61%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=77, last 2 years)	3599 ms * -681%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	581 ms * -26%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 155U	548 ms * -19%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	528 ms * -15%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	515 ms * -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ()	461 ms * -0%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	460.8 ms *
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	400.3 ms * +13%

* ... smaller is better

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	77717 MB/s +22%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	65911 MB/s +3%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	63769 MB/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	63769 MB/s 0%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	63403 MB/s -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	63007 MB/s -1%
Average of class Tablet (32539 - 68769, n=5, last 2 years)	54159 MB/s -15%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	36019 MB/s -44%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	124555 MB/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	124555 MB/s 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	119818 MB/s -4%
Average of class Tablet (31342 - 124555, n=5, last 2 years)	73622 MB/s -41%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	62523 MB/s -50%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	61739 MB/s -50%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	49784 MB/s -60%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	38849 MB/s -69%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	91878 MB/s +104%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	78347 MB/s +74%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	60520 MB/s +34%
Average of class Tablet (33224 - 62397, n=5, last 2 years)	47049 MB/s +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	45097 MB/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	45097 MB/s 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	44742 MB/s -1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	37153 MB/s -18%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core	143.3 ns * -1811%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core	125.5 ns * -1573%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	121.4 ns * -1519%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	92.2 ns * -1129%
Average of class Tablet (7.4 - 110, n=5, last 2 years)	48.1 ns * -541%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	7.5 ns *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ()	7.5 ns * -0%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	7.4 ns * +1%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

由于应用程序 LatencyMon 无法在 ARM 系统上启动，我们无法进行标准的延迟测试。在播放 4K YouTube 视频时，至少没有出现跳帧问题。

大容量存储器

我们的基础版评测设备只配备了一块 256 GB 的三星固态硬盘（PM981）。这是一款小巧的 M.2 2230 固态硬盘，可通过设备后部的磁性盖轻松打开。这就意味着，将固态硬盘更换为更大容量的存储驱动器非常容易，从而避免了支付微软的高额附加费（从 256 GB 升级到 512 GB 需 250 美元）。在不同的在线商店，1 TB SSD 的价格约为 80-100 美元。

三星固态硬盘通过PCIe 4.0连接，性能相当不错，在持续负载下仍能保持稳定。初始安装后，用户可使用 185 GB。其他固态硬盘基准测试这里.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3659 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2509 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 315 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 426 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 64 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 116.3 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 613 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1078 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	90 pt
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	80.5 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	72.7 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	72.1 pt
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	72.1 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	69.6 pt
Average of class Tablet	57.4 pt
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	54.7 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	3321 (3281.98^min - 3320.91^max) MB/s +35%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	2961 (2945.85^min - 2960.71^max) MB/s +21%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2592 (2555.51^min - 2591.66^max) MB/s +6%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2526 (2409.21^min - 2526.44^max) MB/s +3%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	2451 (2391.59^min - 2451.07^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	2451 MB/s 0%
Average of class Tablet (1127 - 2629, n=5, last 2 years)	2070 MB/s -16%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	2044 (2024.17^min - 2044.09^max) MB/s -17%
seq write
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3439 (3052.4^min - 3438.7^max) MB/s +79%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	2964 (2739.3^min - 2964.06^max) MB/s +54%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	2631 (2464.99^min - 2630.67^max) MB/s +37%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	2610 (2491.47^min - 2609.51^max) MB/s +36%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2249 (2116.03^min - 2249.31^max) MB/s +17%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	1920 (1853.32^min - 1920.15^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	1920 MB/s 0%
Average of class Tablet (238 - 2725, n=5, last 2 years)	1699 MB/s -12%
seq q8 t1 read
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	5234 (4365.43^min - 5234.3^max) MB/s +44%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	4977 (4200.4^min - 4976.86^max) MB/s +37%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	4852 (4230.58^min - 4852.03^max) MB/s +34%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4789 (4345.83^min - 4788.71^max) MB/s +32%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	3660 (3274.24^min - 3659.74^max) MB/s +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	3634 (3212.91^min - 3633.94^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	3634 MB/s 0%
Average of class Tablet (1075 - 4955, n=5, last 2 years)	3108 MB/s -14%
seq q8 t1 write
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	4403 (4331.88^min - 4402.97^max) MB/s +81%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	4309 (2943.13^min - 4308.56^max) MB/s +77%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3678 (3661^min - 3677.55^max) MB/s +51%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	3439 (2844.97^min - 3438.66^max) MB/s +41%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2986 (2958.24^min - 2986.34^max) MB/s +23%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	2435 (2059.61^min - 2434.58^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	2435 MB/s 0%
Average of class Tablet (238 - 3623, n=5, last 2 years)	2389 MB/s -2%
4k q1 t1 read
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	65.4 (64.45^min - 65.38^max) MB/s +3%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	63.3 (61.13^min - 63.27^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	63.3 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	60.4 (57.59^min - 60.39^max) MB/s -5%
Average of class Tablet (40.3 - 65.4, n=5, last 2 years)	55.7 MB/s -12%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	54.6 (52.91^min - 54.56^max) MB/s -14%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	49.9 (49.37^min - 49.91^max) MB/s -21%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	31.1 (30.82^min - 31.09^max) MB/s -51%
4k q1 t1 write
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	161.1 (150.7^min - 161.06^max) MB/s +41%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	127.7 (123.8^min - 127.74^max) MB/s +11%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	123.9 (113.54^min - 123.93^max) MB/s +8%
Average of class Tablet (49.4 - 187.5, n=5, last 2 years)	122.3 MB/s +7%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	122 (120.81^min - 121.95^max) MB/s +6%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	120.5 (119.19^min - 120.53^max) MB/s +5%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	114.6 (108.47^min - 114.63^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	114.6 MB/s 0%
4k q32 t16 read
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	1069 (1020.98^min - 1069.39^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	1069 MB/s 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1003 (972.92^min - 1003.23^max) MB/s -6%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	978 (957.59^min - 977.78^max) MB/s -9%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	781 (742.63^min - 781.21^max) MB/s -27%
Average of class Tablet (174 - 1069, n=5, last 2 years)	726 MB/s -32%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	705 (687.5^min - 705.08^max) MB/s -34%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	632 (620.15^min - 631.53^max) MB/s -41%
4k q32 t16 write
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	642 (635.59^min - 642.04^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	642 MB/s 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	631 (619.64^min - 630.94^max) MB/s -2%
Average of class Tablet (212 - 642, n=5, last 2 years)	439 MB/s -32%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	413 (402.24^min - 412.89^max) MB/s -36%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	358 (344.36^min - 358.28^max) MB/s -44%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	335 (320.67^min - 334.9^max) MB/s -48%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	314 (299.4^min - 314.29^max) MB/s -51%

AS SSD
Score Total
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4762 Points +72%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	3586 Points +30%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	3370 Points +22%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	2764 Points
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	2764 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	2248 Points -19%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2242 Points -19%
Average of class Tablet (637 - 2961, n=5, last 2 years)	1997 Points -28%
Score Read
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1315 Points +72%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	1171 Points +53%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	1057 Points +38%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	889 Points +16%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	820 Points +7%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	764 Points
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	764 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (288 - 1019, n=5, last 2 years)	684 Points -10%
Score Write
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2829 Points +73%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	1885 Points +15%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	1841 Points +12%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	1638 Points
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	1638 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1015 Points -38%
Average of class Tablet (226 - 1638, n=5, last 2 years)	999 Points -39%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	971 Points -41%
Seq Read
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	4133 MB/s +50%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3771 MB/s +36%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	3642.65 MB/s +32%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	2968.79 MB/s +7%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2885 MB/s +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	2763 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	2763 MB/s 0%
Average of class Tablet (1072 - 4037, n=5, last 2 years)	2605 MB/s -6%
Seq Write
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2439 MB/s +36%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	2415.77 MB/s +35%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2127 MB/s +19%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	1991.66 MB/s +11%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	1791 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	1791 MB/s 0%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	1562.89 MB/s -13%
Average of class Tablet (227 - 2127, n=5, last 2 years)	1501 MB/s -16%
4K Read
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	69.2 MB/s +21%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	58.39 MB/s +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	57.4 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	57.4 MB/s 0%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	54.3 MB/s -5%
Average of class Tablet (28.7 - 69.2, n=5, last 2 years)	52.8 MB/s -8%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	50.09 MB/s -13%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	28.07 MB/s -51%
4K Write
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	201 MB/s +10%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	184 MB/s 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	183.5 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	183.5 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	167.15 MB/s -9%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	159.18 MB/s -13%
Average of class Tablet (65.2 - 199.4, n=5, last 2 years)	157.3 MB/s -14%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	114.15 MB/s -38%
4K-64 Read
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	884 MB/s +106%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	699.78 MB/s +63%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	654.43 MB/s +52%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	643.12 MB/s +50%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	463 MB/s +8%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	430 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	430 MB/s 0%
Average of class Tablet (137.9 - 549, n=5, last 2 years)	371 MB/s -14%
4K-64 Write
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2384 MB/s +87%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	1482.86 MB/s +16%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	1476.23 MB/s +16%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	1275 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	1275 MB/s 0%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	700.07 MB/s -45%
Average of class Tablet (48.7 - 1275, n=5, last 2 years)	692 MB/s -46%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	618 MB/s -52%
Access Time Read
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	0.122 ms * -198%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	0.098 ms * -139%
Average of class Tablet (0.035 - 0.163, n=5, last 2 years)	0.0892 ms * -118%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	0.084 ms * -105%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.055 ms * -34%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	0.041 ms *
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	0.041 ms * -0%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	0.035 ms * +15%
Access Time Write
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	0.333 ms * -1010%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N	0.307 ms * -923%
Average of class Tablet (0.03 - 0.344, n=5, last 2 years)	0.131 ms * -337%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9	0.066 ms * -120%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	0.031 ms * -3%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	0.03 ms *
Average Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ ()	0.03 ms * -0%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.022 ms * +27%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3641 (3273.65-3660.18)

图形卡 - Adreno X1-85

说到集成的 Adreno X1-85显卡方面，与配备骁龙 X Elite 的 Surface Pro 相比并无差异，因为它们都使用了性能较弱的 3.8 TFLOP 版本，最高主频为 1.2 GHz。在日常使用中，Adreno GPU 表现出色，即使播放高分辨率视频也毫无问题。此外，在连续负载和电池模式下，图形性能也保持稳定。

与 OLED Surface Pro 相比，基准测试结果略好，这可能是因为高通公司向我们的评测人员分发了更新的 GPU 驱动程序测试版。这改善了游戏兼容性（如支持《孤岛惊魂 5》，《赛博朋克 2077》不再崩溃）。高通公司本身并不向公众提供这种可下载的驱动程序，而是会在某个时候通过正常的 Windows 和制造商更新发布。不过，这是迄今为止尚未发生过的事情。

从本质上讲，游戏性能比 AMD 和英特尔 iGPU 差很多，许多游戏也无法正常运行（如《全面战争法老王》中的图形错误）或根本无法启动（F1 23/F124）。其他 GPU 基准测试见这里.

3DMark 11 | 3DMark | Geekbench 6.2

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Minisforum V3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	12345 Points +92%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	11659 Points +81%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	6741 Points +5%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	6429 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	6311 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (4823 - 6515, n=9)	6200 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	6007 Points -7%
Average of class Tablet (2912 - 6429, n=5, last 2 years)	4636 Points -28%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Minisforum V3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	7818 Points +22%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	6722 Points +5%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	6410 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	6294 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (5569 - 6454, n=10)	6231 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	5390 Points -16%
Average of class Tablet (1781 - 6410, n=4, last 2 years)	4489 Points -30%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	4284 Points -33%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Minisforum V3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	2780 Points +62%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	2252 Points +31%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	1715 Points
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	1712 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (1617 - 1739, n=10)	1705 Points -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	1700 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	1668 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet (561 - 1715, n=4, last 2 years)	1245 Points -27%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	6430 Points
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (6248 - 6430, n=5)	6322 Points -2%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	6248 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet (72 - 8889, n=76, last 2 years)	1424 Points -78%
Steel Nomad Light Score
Average of class Tablet (237 - 3592, n=8, last 2 years)	2202 Points +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	2187 Points
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (2000 - 2194, n=8)	2103 Points -4%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	2012 Points -8%
Steel Nomad Score
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	524 Points
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (476 - 538, n=7)	510 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet (477 - 524, n=2, last 2 years)	501 Points -4%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	477 Points -9%

Geekbench 6.2
GPU OpenCL
Minisforum V3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	27982 Points +39%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	27978 Points +39%
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (19879 - 20906, n=9)	20412 Points +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	20185 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	19879 Points -2%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	17437 Points -14%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	15823 Points -22%
Average of class Tablet (343 - 20185, n=30, last 2 years)	3684 Points -82%
GPU Vulkan 6.2
Minisforum V3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	28404 Points +19%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	27393 Points +15%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	23831 Points
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (23174 - 24430, n=9)	23719 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	23348 Points -2%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	19667 Points -17%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	15598 Points -35%
Average of class Tablet (433 - 23831, n=29, last 2 years)	4202 Points -82%

3DMark 11 Performance		6886 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		6130 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		1894 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score		524 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score		2187 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Tablet (637 - 2098, n=5, last 2 years)	1225 Seconds * -63%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100	751 Seconds *
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 7 155U	649 Seconds * +14%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	638 Seconds * +15%
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (545 - 751, n=8)	638 Seconds * +15%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	637 Seconds * +15%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	404 Seconds * +46%
Minisforum V3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	383 Seconds * +49%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	100 pt
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 ^-1! AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	86.3 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	69 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ ^-1! Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	67.6 pt
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 ^-1! Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	64.9 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML ^-1! Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	53.9 pt
Average of class Tablet	53.7 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	30.4 (15.4^min, 16.7^P0.1, 18.9^P1) fps +52%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	24.1 (21^min) fps +21%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	20 fps
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	18.8 fps -6%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	17.9 (15^min) fps -10%
Average of class Tablet (8.5 - 20, n=4, last 2 years)	14.5 fps -27%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	11.9 (10^min) fps -40%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	26.5 (2.34^min, 18.5^P1) fps +27%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	20.8 (2.32^min, 12.3^P1) fps
Average of class Tablet (7.79 - 20.8, n=2, last 2 years)	14.3 fps -31%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	27.1 fps +73%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	23.7 fps +51%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	16.3 fps +4%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	15.7 fps 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	15.7 fps
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	15.4 fps -2%
Average of class Tablet (7.29 - 15.7, n=4, last 2 years)	12.5 fps -20%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	45.6 (5^min, 16.5^P1) fps +23%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	39.9 (6.9^min, 8.65^P1) fps +8%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	37 fps 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	37 fps
Average of class Tablet (17.9 - 37, n=3, last 2 years)	30.6 fps -17%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	30.3 (7.5^min, 11.1^P1) fps -18%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	22.9 (7.3^min, 9.15^P1) fps -38%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	73.2 (64.1^min) fps +63%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	66.7 (56.4^min) fps +48%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	54.2 (41.9^min) fps +20%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	51.6 (40.6^min) fps +15%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	50 (40.1^min) fps +11%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	45 (33.5^min) fps
Average of class Tablet (13.2 - 51.6, n=5, last 2 years)	39.1 fps -13%

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | F1 22 | Far Cry 5

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off)
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	38.7 (32.8^min) fps +68%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	34.3 (29^min) fps +49%
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (21 - 24.6, n=10)	23.2 fps +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	23 (17.3^min) fps
Average of class Tablet (21 - 23, n=2, last 2 years)	22 fps -4%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	21.6 (16.7^min) fps -6%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	21 (15.9^min) fps -9%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	18.5 (6.99^min) fps -20%

Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Low Preset
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	31 fps +31%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	23.6 fps
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (19.4 - 25.1, n=9)	23.5 fps 0%
Average of class Tablet (23.2 - 23.6, n=2, last 2 years)	23.4 fps -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	23.2 fps -2%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	17.7 fps -25%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	16.2 fps -31%

F1 22 - 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	74.3 (65^min, 50^P1) fps +35%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	58.4 (25^min, 37^P1) fps +6%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	55 (38^min, 37^P1) fps
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (49.6 - 56.6, n=8)	52.8 fps -4%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	49.6 (32^min, 28^P1) fps -10%
Average of class Tablet (22.5 - 55, n=3, last 2 years)	42.4 fps -23%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	40.5 (32^min, 33^P1) fps -26%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	35.9 (30^min, 30^P1) fps -35%

Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	48 (43^min) fps +92%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	36 (7^min) fps +44%
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (25 - 34, n=5)	29.6 fps +18%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	25 (7^min) fps 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	25 fps
Average of class Tablet (last 2 years)	25 fps 0%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	20 (12^min) fps -20%

Cyberpunk 2077 FPS diagram

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS: Ø10.8 (8.97-12)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)	104.2	97.7	49.2	20.8
The Witcher 3 (2015)	107	70	40	20
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	61.4	46.3	46.1	45
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	54.9	25.4	15.7
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	39
Far Cry 5 (2018)	32	25	23	22
Strange Brigade (2018)	140	52	43	37
F1 22 (2022)	61.7	55	37	28.1
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	23.6	19.5	16.9	16.6
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	23	18.2	16.4	14.3

排放与能源

噪音排放

在日常使用中，配备 Snapdragon X Plus 的 Surface Pro 经常是完全静音运行，即使在较高负载的情况下，风扇也不会总是启动。不过，如果处理器处于超负荷运行状态或玩游戏时，它的噪音会达到与 OLED 机型完全相同的水平，最高可达 44.7 分贝（A）。 OLED 机型.有趣的是，在玩游戏时，基本机型的声音要比 OLED 机型大。如果使用较弱的能耗配置文件，最大音量会降至 40.1 dB(A)（性能更佳）和 37.7 dB(A)（推荐）。评测设备没有发出其他电气噪音

Noise Level

Idle		23.8 / 23.8 / 23.8 dB(A)
Load		23.8 / 44.7 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.8 dB(A)

	Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 155U	Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N
Noise		-8%	-17%	-8%	5%	-4%
off / environment *	23.8	23.6 1%	25.4 -7%	23.6 1%	23.3 2%	23 3%
Idle Minimum *	23.8	23.6 1%	26.7 -12%	24.3 -2%	23.3 2%	23.5 1%
Idle Average *	23.8	23.6 1%	31.6 -33%	24.3 -2%	23.3 2%	24.2 -2%
Idle Maximum *	23.8	25.2 -6%	32.5 -37%	24.8 -4%	24.6 -3%	24.2 -2%
Load Average *	23.8	39 -64%	32.7 -37%	33.5 -41%	26.2 -10%	29.6 -24%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	44.7	39 13%
Load Maximum *	44.7	44.8 -0%	34 24%	43.8 2%	27.3 39%	44.9 -0%
Witcher 3 ultra *			33.2	43.8	27.3	44.9

* ... smaller is better

温度

温度情况与更昂贵的 Surface Pro OLED 非常相似。在空闲使用和执行日常任务时，机身依然凉爽宜人，但一旦负载增加，金属机身就会迅速变热。由于金属表面的缘故，虽然我们没有在笔记本电脑的任何部位记录到超过 45°C 的温度，但操作设备时还是会感到不舒服。由于采用了脚架，确保了不会直接接触到发热的表面，因此用户仍可将二合一设备放在膝盖上使用。在综合 CPU/GPU 负载的压力测试中，CPU 时钟速度迅速稳定在 ~2.2 GHz，GPU 时钟速度稳定在 ~800 MHz。

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


40.2 °C	42.8 °C	43.1 °C
40.4 °C	41.5 °C	41.1 °C
43.9 °C	43.6 °C	42.1 °C

Maximum: 43.9 °C
Average: 42.1 °C


44.6 °C	44.9 °C	43.1 °C
43.5 °C	44.9 °C	43.5 °C
41.3 °C	42.3 °C	42.4 °C

Maximum: 44.9 °C
Average: 43.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 39.6 °C | Room Temperature 22.7 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


24.9 °C	25.1 °C	25.3 °C
25.4 °C	25.4 °C	25.7 °C
26.2 °C	26.2 °C	26 °C

Maximum: 26.2 °C
Average: 25.6 °C


24.1 °C	24.6 °C	24.6 °C
24.2 °C	24.5 °C	24.5 °C
24.1 °C	24.4 °C	24.3 °C

Maximum: 24.6 °C
Average: 24.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 24.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


39.8 °C	42.7 °C	43 °C
40.7 °C	41.5 °C	41.2 °C
43.4 °C	44 °C	42.8 °C

Maximum: 44 °C
Average: 42.1 °C


43.7 °C	44 °C	44.1 °C
41.4 °C	45.1 °C	44.4 °C
41.5 °C	42.2 °C	42.3 °C

Maximum: 45.1 °C
Average: 43.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 39 °C | Room Temperature 22.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the class Tablet.

	Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Heat		-4%	-30%	-14%	-8%	-1%
Maximum Upper Side *	43.9	43.1 2%	50.5 -15%	41.2 6%	39.2 11%	37.4 15%
Maximum Bottom *	44.9	46.3 -3%	54.8 -22%	48.4 -8%	41 9%	39 13%
Idle Upper Side *	26.2	27.5 -5%	34.9 -33%	29.4 -12%	32.2 -23%	28.6 -9%
Idle Bottom *	24.6	26.8 -9%	36.3 -48%	35.2 -43%	31.6 -28%	30.6 -24%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Minisforum V3 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

耗电量

就最低耗电量而言，IPS 机型要经济一些，但相比之下，它在全亮度时的耗电量（最大 9.5 瓦）要比 OLED 型号.不过，值得指出的是，OLED 机型得益于深色标准壁纸，而使用浅色壁纸时耗电量会增加。在负载情况下，设备最初在 39 瓦电源适配器的限制范围内运行，然后稳定在 40 瓦左右。这与 OLED 型号.

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.25 / 0.37 Watt
Idle	1.9 / 9.2 / 9.5 Watt
Load	29.6 / 40.7 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ	Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 155U	Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N
Power Consumption		8%	-152%	-49%	-100%	-9%
Idle Minimum *	1.9	2.8 -47%	10.1 -432%	4.5 -137%	7.1 -274%	2.3 -21%
Idle Average *	9.2	3.9 58%	16.9 -84%	8.4 9%	9.1 1%	6.7 27%
Idle Maximum *	9.5	4.9 48%	20.6 -117%	8.9 6%	18.4 -94%	6.8 28%
Load Average *	29.6	34.3 -16%	51.7 -75%	50.7 -71%	51.3 -73%	34.1 -15%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	39.5	35.8 9%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	37.4	36 4%
Load Maximum *	40.7	41.2 -1%	61.2 -50%	62.4 -53%	65.5 -61%	67 -65%
Witcher 3 ultra *			55.4	50.8	41.5	27.4

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk 2077 / stress test

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø38.5 (34.8-40.7)

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.02 (3.77-4.82)

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø39.5 (32.8-40.8)

Power consumption with an external monitor

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø40.6 (40.5-40.7)

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø14.4 (13-32.6)

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø39.2 (36.6-40.8)

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø18.5 (17.3-36.8)

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø5.34 (4.97-6.54)

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR - external Monitor: Ø37.4 (34.1-40.1)

电池寿命

总体而言，基本机型的电池续航时间稍弱，但值得考虑的是，其电池容量较小，约少 10%（47 Wh 对 53 Wh）。我们不确定重量是否是决定性因素，或者 OLED 机型是否不想表现得更差。在 150 cd/m²（占评测设备最大 SDR 亮度的 56%）的 Wi-fi 测试中，两款机型的性能相当，运行时间都不到 11 小时。在 Wi-Fi 测试中，在 SDR 全亮度条件下，OLED 机型的运行时间要比 OLED 机型少 1 小时左右。以 120 Hz 的频率运行时，在 150 cd/m² 的亮度条件下，运行时间缩短了约 80 分钟，而在全亮度条件下，两者的差距仅为几分钟。在视频测试中，基本型的运行时间为 14 小时，也不得不向 OLED 型（近 16 小时）认输。

由于电池容量较小，完整的充电周期减少了 10 分钟，但 133 分钟的开机时间仍然相当慢（78 分钟后为 80%）。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		11h 02min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		5h 9min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		14h 01min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 29min

	Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 47 Wh	Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 53 Wh	Minisforum V3 R7 8840U, Radeon 780M, 50.82 Wh	Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 54 Wh	Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core, 80 Wh	Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, 60 Wh	Average of class Tablet
Battery Runtime		10%	-7%	35%	-8%	-28%	81%
H.264	841	953 13%					935 ?(463 - 1952, n=55, last 2 years) 11%
WiFi v1.3	662	665 0%	352 -47%	787 19%	608 -8%	651 -2%	830 ?(319 - 1764, n=82, last 2 years) 25%
Load	89	104 17%	119 34%	134 51%		42 -53%	274 ?(89 - 722, n=59, last 2 years) 208%

Pros

+ 明亮的 IPS 面板，色彩准确（sRGB）

+ 优质外壳

+ 良好的系统性能

+ 出色的摄像头

+ 电池寿命长

+ USB 4 和 Wi-Fi 7

+ 可交换固态硬盘（M.2 2230）

+ 可选键盘盖和集成手写笔

Cons

- 负载下/游戏时机箱温度过高

- IPS 面板未覆盖 P3 色彩空间

- IPS 机型电池容量较小

- 没有 3.5 毫米音频插孔

- 无 SD 读卡器

结论 - 日常使用中价格更低但速度不慢的 Surface Pro

新款微软 Surface Pro Copilot+ 基础版的起售价约为 1,000 美元，是一款有趣的设备。虽然据说速度较慢的骁龙 X Plus 的 CPU 性能略逊一筹，但 GPU 性能完全相同，可以轻松胜任日常任务。总的来说，Windows，特别是本地应用程序运行得非常好。不过，潜在客户必须注意，新的 Windows 版本不像英特尔或 AMD 芯片那样灵活，因为需要特殊的 ARM 版本。这可能会导致与自带驱动程序的应用程序、游戏或外围设备的兼容性问题。最好事先研究一下所需的应用程序/游戏是否兼容。

与几乎所有更昂贵的 OLED 机型一样，基本机型提供 16 GB 内存，但只有一个 256 GB SSD。微软还提供升级到 512 GB 的服务，但需要额外支付高昂的 250 美元。由于更换 M.2 2230 固态硬盘非常容易，因此最好还是自己更换硬盘。除此之外，没有其他维护选项，也无法接触到内部（包括风扇）。在日常情况下，Surface Pro Copilot+ 基本上是静音的，只有在持续负载的情况下（如游戏时）才会有明显的噪音。在这种情况下，铝制外壳在操作设备时会发热。

新款微软 Surface Pro Copilot+ 的基本型号性价比明显更高。在日常使用中，骁龙 X Plus 处理器有足够的动力，虽然明亮的 IPS 触摸屏不会受到 PWM 的影响，但由于无法覆盖 P3 色彩空间，因此图像质量与 OLED 屏幕相比还有差距。更换 256 GB 的小型固态硬盘既简单又便宜，用户自己就能完成。

除了处理器之外，最大的区别在于显示屏的选择，因为基本型号配备的是 IPS 触摸屏，而不是 OLED 面板。它可能无法提供 OLED 带来的主观画质（鲜艳的色彩和深邃的黑色），但凭借 600 cd/m²的亮度、高分辨率和 120 Hz 的刷新率，它也是一款出色的显示屏，不会出现 PWM 相关问题。尽管如此，微软并没有提到 IPS 屏幕并没有完全覆盖 P3 色彩空间。不过，有了精确的 sRGB 配置文件，这对大多数用户来说都不是问题。

另外一个区别是电池容量。基本型号的电池容量为 47 Wh，比 OLED 版本小 10%。我们认为微软是在补偿 IPS 屏幕带来的额外重量，因为两款产品的重量几乎相同。不过，这样做的结果是在某些情况下电池续航时间会稍短一些。

如今，Windows 平板电脑/二合一设备在很大程度上被制造商所忽视。虽然仍有一些商务设备，如 ThinkPad X12或游戏机型，如华硕 ROG Flow Z13等商务设备，但 Surface Pro Copilot+ 的唯一直接竞争对手迷你论坛 V3而 Surface Pro Copilot+ 的唯一直接竞争对手 Minforum V3 不仅价格更贵，而且风扇更活跃，电池寿命更短。

价格和供应情况

配备 IPS 显示屏的 Surface Pro 11 Copilot+ 基本型号在亚马逊的售价约为 1,069 美元。

注：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息此处.

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ - 2024-08-10 08/10/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

91 / 98 → 92%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

64 / 69 → 92%

Weight

77 / 40-88 → 77%

Battery

89%

Display

81%

Games Performance

39 / 65 → 59%

Application Performance

75 / 92 → 81%

Temperature

83%

Noise

84%

Audio

85 / 91 → 93%

Camera

70 / 90 → 78%

Average

68%

81%

Tablet - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
50%

Packaging
100%

Power Use
89.2%

Repairability
50%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 51.9%

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andrew Dickson - Translator - 104 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 434458 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 微软 Surface Pro IPS Copilot+ 评测--基本机型配备 IPS 显示屏和骁龙 X Plus

Andreas Osthoff, 2024-08-14 (Update: 2024-08-14)

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit in comparison
Lenovo B50-30 (min) N2815, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	49
...
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M	1986
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ R7 6800HS, Radeon RX 6700S	1987
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 i7-11850H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	1988
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	1989
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1990
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 G1-21D20016GE R7 PRO 6860Z, Radeon 680M	1992
HP EliteBook 840 G9 i7-1280P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1992
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	15842

微软 Surface Pro IPS Copilot+ 评测--基本机型配备 IPS 显示屏和骁龙 X Plus

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳和功能

尺寸比较

显示屏 - 600 cd/m² IPS 触摸屏

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - 骁龙 X Plus 和快速内存

测试条件

处理器 - Snaprdragon X1P-64-100

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

系统性能

DPC 延迟

大容量存储器

Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡 - Adreno X1-85

Cyberpunk 2077 FPS diagram

排放与能源

噪音排放

温度

发言人

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ audio analysis

Minisforum V3 audio analysis

Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 audio analysis

Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 audio analysis

Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML audio analysis

耗电量

Power consumption Cyberpunk 2077 / stress test

Power consumption with an external monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 - 日常使用中价格更低但速度不慢的 Surface Pro

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison

3DMark 11 in comparison
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	6870
Acer Aspire Vero AV15-53P i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6873
Dell XPS 13 9345 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	6884
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	6886
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450	6890
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 i7-1365U i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6896
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6901
...
(max) R7 7800X3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	72163