我们已经对配备 OLED 面板的全新 Surface Pro 11 进行了广泛评测，现在我们来看看配备速度较慢的高通 骁龙 X Plus 处理器和 IPS 触摸屏。微软对基本机型的收费约为 1,000 美元，虽然配备了 16 GB 内存，但只有一个小的 256 GB SSD。如果要升级到 512 GB 固态硬盘，需要再向微软支付 250 美元，但你也可以自己轻松升级固态硬盘。
在机箱、端口、Wi-Fi 性能、网络摄像头或扬声器方面，与已评测过的 高端机型骁龙 X 精英版和 OLED 面板相比，在机箱、端口、Wi-Fi 性能、网络摄像头或扬声器方面都没有任何区别，这就是为什么我们要向你推荐 我们的评论了解有关这些主题的详细信息。在本文中，我们将集中讨论 IPS 显示屏和性能较弱的骁龙 X Plus，以及它对废气排放的影响。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80.7 % | v8 | 08 / 2024 | Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | 872 g | 9.3 mm | 13.00" | 2880x1920 | |
| 82.5 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | 870 g | 9.3 mm | 13.00" | 2880x1920 | |
| 85.7 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Minisforum V3 R7 8840U, Radeon 780M | 928 g | 9.8 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 80.1 % | v8 | 06 / 2024 | Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M | 1.7 kg | 18.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 87 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core | 1.4 kg | 15.95 mm | 13.30" | 2880x1800 | |
| 87.4 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core | 1.6 kg | 18.5 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 |
注：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息 此处.
外壳和功能
正如我们已经提到的，入门级机型和 OLED 机型在外壳和功能设置方面基本上没有区别。 OLED 版本.不过，IPS 机型的电池容量为 47 Wh，略小于 OLED 机型的 53 Wh。由于重量仅相差 2 克，这意味着 IPS 面板肯定要重一些。
显示屏 - 600 cd/m² IPS 触摸屏
Surface Pro 各款机型之间最大的不同其实是屏幕。基本型号配备的不是 OLED 面板，而是 IPS 触摸屏。分辨率（2,880 x 1,920 像素）、SDR 亮度（600 尼特）和刷新率（120 赫兹）完全相同。当然，在主观画质方面，两种面板还是有区别的。毫无疑问，OLED 型号的色彩更鲜艳，黑色更深邃（因此对比度更高），而且在 HDR 内容方面也有更大的优势。不过，IPS 面板也不失为一个好的选择，从主观角度来看，它也能提供良好的图像质量，只是黑阶略高。但最大的优点是没有 PWM 闪烁。亮度和色温都可以通过传感器自动调节。
我们可以确认标称的 600 cd/m² 亮度，但这只是在一个区域。平均亮度为 575 cd/m²，再加上 0.56 cd/m² 的高黑阶，对比度仅略高于 1.000:1。这对于日常使用来说已经足够好了，但你很难将其称为出色的对比度。在全亮度状态下，会有轻微的光渗出，虽然响应时间不是特别快，但高刷新率意味着运动非常流畅，而且我们面对的是一台并非为游戏而设计的机器。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 585 cd/m²
Contrast: 1045:1 (Black: 0.56 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
79.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ LP129WT342166, IPS, 2880x1920, 13" | Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ ATNA30DW01-1, OLED, 2880x1920, 13" | Minisforum V3 BOE, NE140QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AU Optronics B14UAT, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 SDC ATNA33AA02-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML LEN140WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 11% | 8% | -52% | 14% | -7% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 83.4 | 98.9 19% | 97.7 17% | 35.7 -57% | 99.7 20% | 71.6 -14% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.7 | 99.4 0% | 99.8 0% | 53.6 -46% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 79.4 | 89.5 13% | 85.4 8% | 36.9 -54% | 97 22% | 73.4 -8% |
| Response Times | 98% | 66% | 27% | 92% | 14% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39.6 ? | 0.32 ? 99% | 10 ? 75% | 23 ? 42% | 1.88 ? 95% | 28.8 ? 27% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 18 ? | 0.58 ? 97% | 8 ? 56% | 15.8 ? 12% | 2.1 ? 88% | 18 ? -0% |
| PWM Frequency | 480 ? | 60 ? | ||||
| Screen | 192% | -61% | -104% | -83% | -60% | |
| Brightness middle | 585 | 580 -1% | 512 -12% | 267.6 -54% | 362.6 -38% | 302.7 -48% |
| Brightness | 574 | 581 1% | 495 -14% | 240 -58% | 368 -36% | 293 -49% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 99 11% | 91 2% | 84 -6% | 97 9% | 88 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.56 | 0.04 93% | 0.48 14% | 0.31 45% | 0.35 37% | |
| Contrast | 1045 | 14500 1288% | 1067 2% | 863 -17% | 865 -17% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 0.7 46% | 4.32 -232% | 4.67 -259% | 4.66 -258% | 3.45 -165% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3 | 2.1 30% | 7.04 -135% | 17.52 -484% | 7.25 -142% | 6.04 -101% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 0.6 70% | 4.22 -111% | 2 -0% | 2.6 -30% | 4.7 -135% |
| Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.16 102% | 2.31 95% | 2.15 102% | 2.2 100% | 2.1 105% |
| CCT | 6914 94% | 6484 100% | 6770 96% | 6585 99% | 6055 107% | 5804 112% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.17 | 2.49 | 0.56 | 0.47 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 100% /
136% | 4% /
-25% | -43% /
-72% | 8% /
-25% | -18% /
-36% |
* ... smaller is better
另外一个区别是色彩空间覆盖率。微软没有提供任何细节，虽然两种显示屏都拥有相同的 sRGB 和Vivid色彩配置文件，但 IPS 面板只能完全覆盖 sRGB 色彩空间，P3 仅为 83%。因此，你无法使用Vivid配置文件做太多事情，因为与 sRGB 参考相比，色彩偏差非常大。不过，在我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件进行分析时，sRGB 配置文件给人留下了很好的印象，其中最突出的一点就是色彩偏差小。尽管如此，色温还是略微偏冷。由于我们的软件（i1 Profiler）目前无法在 ARM 版本的 Windows 系统上运行，因此我们无法对面板进行正确校准。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Surface Pro 的屏幕非常光亮，即使在室内也很容易产生恼人的反光。高亮度在一定程度上有所帮助，但在晴天或非常明亮的日子里，仍然很难在户外舒适地工作。IPS 面板具有出色的视角稳定性。
性能 - 骁龙 X Plus 和快速内存
Surface Pro Copilot+ 的基本型号配备了骁龙 X Plus 处理器和 16GB 内存（LPDDR5x 8448），但内存不能升级。
测试条件
微软没有提供任何额外的能源配置文件，相反，你只能在设置中更改能源状态。与通常的 Surface 设备一样，在命名方面（与其他 Windows 笔记本电脑相比）略有不同，但大致相同。我们使用 "最佳性能 "模式进行了以下基准测试和测量，但也提供了 "更佳性能 "和" 推荐 "模式（与其他 Windows 笔记本电脑的 "平衡 "和"最佳 能效 "模式相对应）。没有官方的 TDP 数据，但消耗值与配备 Snapdragon X Elite 的 OLED 机型相对应，我们假设为 23-30 瓦。
处理器 - Snaprdragon X1P-64-100
Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 是目前高通公司速度最慢的 Snapdragon X 处理器。与 Elite 芯片不同，它只提供 10 个而不是 12 个 CPU 内核，时钟频率为 3.4 GHz。同样，骁龙 X Plus 也没有双核涡轮增压技术。这意味着该芯片落后于 OLED 型号 X1E-80-100，尤其是在单核测试中。不过，总的来说，性能还是非常不错的，在日常情况下你不会注意到机型之间的差异。在下表中，只有前两项基准测试（CB 2024 和 Geekbench 6）是在 Surface Pro 上进行的。其他所有基准都是通过模拟运行的，这对性能造成了一定的影响。
不过，多核性能并不能维持太久。在 Cinebench R15 循环中，结果迅速下降，当我们查看 CB24 Multi 运行期间的 CPU 速度时，可以看到芯片最高 3.4 GHz 的频率仅持续了约 20 秒，然后稳定在 2.5-2.6 GHz。要达到完全的多核性能，即使是骁龙 X Plus 也需要更强大的散热系统。在电池模式下，性能保持不变。其他 CPU 基准测试 这里.
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 -2! | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 -2! | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML -2! | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Tablet (795 - 893, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 () | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Tablet (109 - 123, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 () | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 () | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 () | |
| Average of class Tablet (3066 - 9927, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Tablet (559 - 1559, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 () | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 () | |
| Average of class Tablet (1175 - 3640, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Tablet (205 - 596, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 () | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 () | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Average of class Tablet (433 - 2249, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 () | |
| Average of class Tablet (119 - 248, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average of class Tablet (351 - 1080, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 () | |
| Average of class Tablet (12470 - 44404, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 () | |
| Average of class Tablet (3915 - 5359, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 () | |
| Average of class Tablet (2.68 - 9.13, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Average of class Tablet (51.9 - 117.6, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 () | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 () | |
| Average of class Tablet (0.532 - 1.012, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 () | |
| Average of class Tablet (2184 - 7637, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Average of class Tablet (5315 - 35296, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 () | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 () | |
| Average of class Tablet (785 - 2607, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 () | |
| Average of class Tablet (27210 - 69762, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Tablet (1161 - 3974, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 () | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 () | |
| Average of class Tablet (6842 - 16614, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Average of class Tablet (1275 - 71089, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Average of class Tablet (229 - 802, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 () | |
| Average of class Tablet (1127 - 3718, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 () | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Tablet (14660 - 38707, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
系统性能
就像 Surface Pro 更昂贵的 OLED 机型一样，基本款在处理日常任务时也非常灵敏。因此，我们在系统稳定性方面没有遇到任何问题，但并不是每个应用程序都能运行。如果你不仅打算使用日常应用程序（办公、浏览器、视频流等），就应该事先做一些研究，以免出现令人讨厌的意外。此外，需要自带驱动程序的外围设备也可能出现兼容性问题。
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS () | |
| Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS () | |
| Average of class Tablet (185 - 1797, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS () | |
| Average of class Tablet (151 - 2350, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS () | |
| Average of class Tablet (205 - 1462, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS () | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS () | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS () | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
* ... smaller is better
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 () | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Tablet (32539 - 68769, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 () | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Tablet (31342 - 124555, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Average of class Tablet (33224 - 62397, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 () | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Tablet (7.4 - 110, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 () | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
由于应用程序 LatencyMon 无法在 ARM 系统上启动，我们无法进行标准的延迟测试。在播放 4K YouTube 视频时，至少没有出现跳帧问题。
大容量存储器
我们的基础版评测设备只配备了一块 256 GB 的三星固态硬盘（PM981）。这是一款小巧的 M.2 2230 固态硬盘，可通过设备后部的磁性盖轻松打开。这就意味着，将固态硬盘更换为更大容量的存储驱动器非常容易，从而避免了支付微软的高额附加费（从 256 GB 升级到 512 GB 需 250 美元）。在不同的在线商店，1 TB SSD 的价格约为 80-100 美元。
三星固态硬盘通过PCIe 4.0连接，性能相当不错，在持续负载下仍能保持稳定。初始安装后，用户可使用 185 GB。其他固态硬盘基准测试 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡 - Adreno X1-85
说到集成的 Adreno X1-85显卡方面，与配备骁龙 X Elite 的 Surface Pro 相比并无差异，因为它们都使用了性能较弱的 3.8 TFLOP 版本，最高主频为 1.2 GHz。在日常使用中，Adreno GPU 表现出色，即使播放高分辨率视频也毫无问题。此外，在连续负载和电池模式下，图形性能也保持稳定。
与 OLED Surface Pro 相比，基准测试结果略好，这可能是因为高通公司向我们的评测人员分发了更新的 GPU 驱动程序测试版。这改善了游戏兼容性（如支持《孤岛惊魂 5》，《赛博朋克 2077》不再崩溃）。高通公司本身并不向公众提供这种可下载的驱动程序，而是会在某个时候通过正常的 Windows 和制造商更新发布。不过，这是迄今为止尚未发生过的事情。
从本质上讲，游戏性能比 AMD 和英特尔 iGPU 差很多，许多游戏也无法正常运行（如《全面战争法老王》中的图形错误）或根本无法启动（F1 23/F124）。其他 GPU 基准测试见 这里.
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 6886 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6130 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1894 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 524 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 2187 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Average of class Tablet (637 - 2098, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (545 - 899, n=10) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 -1! | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ -1! | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 -1! | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML -1! | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Average of class Tablet (8.5 - 20, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Tablet (7.79 - 20.8, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Tablet (7.29 - 15.7, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (16.3 - 24.6, n=12) | |
| Average of class Tablet (21 - 23, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML | |
Cyberpunk 2077 FPS diagram
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 104.2 | 97.7 | 49.2 | 20.8 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 107 | 70 | 40 | 20 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 61.4 | 46.3 | 46.1 | 45 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 54.9 | 25.4 | 15.7 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 39 | |||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 32 | 25 | 23 | 22 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 140 | 52 | 43 | 37 |
| F1 22 (2022) | 61.7 | 55 | 37 | 28.1 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 23.6 | 19.5 | 16.9 | 16.6 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 23 | 18.2 | 16.4 | 14.3 |
排放与能源
噪音排放
在日常使用中，配备 Snapdragon X Plus 的 Surface Pro 经常是完全静音运行，即使在较高负载的情况下，风扇也不会总是启动。不过，如果处理器处于超负荷运行状态或玩游戏时，它的噪音会达到与 OLED 机型完全相同的水平，最高可达 44.7 分贝（A）。 OLED 机型.有趣的是，在玩游戏时，基本机型的声音要比 OLED 机型大。如果使用较弱的能耗配置文件，最大音量会降至 40.1 dB(A)（性能更佳）和 37.7 dB(A)（推荐）。评测设备没有发出其他电气噪音
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 23.8 / 23.8 / 23.8 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 23.8 / 44.7 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.8 dB(A) | ||
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ | Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB | Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 | Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 155U | Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -8% | -17% | -8% | 5% | -4% | |
| off / environment * | 23.8 | 23.6 1% | 25.4 -7% | 23.6 1% | 23.3 2% | 23 3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 23.8 | 23.6 1% | 26.7 -12% | 24.3 -2% | 23.3 2% | 23.5 1% |
| Idle Average * | 23.8 | 23.6 1% | 31.6 -33% | 24.3 -2% | 23.3 2% | 24.2 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 23.8 | 25.2 -6% | 32.5 -37% | 24.8 -4% | 24.6 -3% | 24.2 -2% |
| Load Average * | 23.8 | 39 -64% | 32.7 -37% | 33.5 -41% | 26.2 -10% | 29.6 -24% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 44.7 | 39 13% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 44.7 | 44.8 -0% | 34 24% | 43.8 2% | 27.3 39% | 44.9 -0% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 33.2 | 43.8 | 27.3 | 44.9 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
温度情况与更昂贵的 Surface Pro OLED 非常相似。在空闲使用和执行日常任务时，机身依然凉爽宜人，但一旦负载增加，金属机身就会迅速变热。由于金属表面的缘故，虽然我们没有在笔记本电脑的任何部位记录到超过 45°C 的温度，但操作设备时还是会感到不舒服。由于采用了脚架，确保了不会直接接触到发热的表面，因此用户仍可将二合一设备放在膝盖上使用。在综合 CPU/GPU 负载的压力测试中，CPU 时钟速度迅速稳定在 ~2.2 GHz，GPU 时钟速度稳定在 ~800 MHz。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the class Tablet.
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M | Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -4% | -30% | -14% | -8% | -1% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 43.9 | 43.1 2% | 50.5 -15% | 41.2 6% | 39.2 11% | 37.4 15% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 44.9 | 46.3 -3% | 54.8 -22% | 48.4 -8% | 41 9% | 39 13% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 26.2 | 27.5 -5% | 34.9 -33% | 29.4 -12% | 32.2 -23% | 28.6 -9% |
| Idle Bottom * | 24.6 | 26.8 -9% | 36.3 -48% | 35.2 -43% | 31.6 -28% | 30.6 -24% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Minisforum V3 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
耗电量
| Off / Standby | 0.25 / 0.37 Watt |
| Idle | 1.9 / 9.2 / 9.5 Watt |
| Load |
29.6 / 40.7 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ | Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB | Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 | Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 155U | Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 8% | -152% | -49% | -100% | -9% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.9 | 2.8 -47% | 10.1 -432% | 4.5 -137% | 7.1 -274% | 2.3 -21% |
| Idle Average * | 9.2 | 3.9 58% | 16.9 -84% | 8.4 9% | 9.1 1% | 6.7 27% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.5 | 4.9 48% | 20.6 -117% | 8.9 6% | 18.4 -94% | 6.8 28% |
| Load Average * | 29.6 | 34.3 -16% | 51.7 -75% | 50.7 -71% | 51.3 -73% | 34.1 -15% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 39.5 | 35.8 9% | ||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 37.4 | 36 4% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 40.7 | 41.2 -1% | 61.2 -50% | 62.4 -53% | 65.5 -61% | 67 -65% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 55.4 | 50.8 | 41.5 | 27.4 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk 2077 / stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
总体而言，基本机型的电池续航时间稍弱，但值得考虑的是，其电池容量较小，约少 10%（47 Wh 对 53 Wh）。我们不确定重量是否是决定性因素，或者 OLED 机型是否不想表现得更差。在 150 cd/m²（占评测设备最大 SDR 亮度的 56%）的 Wi-fi 测试中，两款机型的性能相当，运行时间都不到 11 小时。在 Wi-Fi 测试中，在 SDR 全亮度条件下，OLED 机型的运行时间要比 OLED 机型少 1 小时左右。以 120 Hz 的频率运行时，在 150 cd/m² 的亮度条件下，运行时间缩短了约 80 分钟，而在全亮度条件下，两者的差距仅为几分钟。在视频测试中，基本型的运行时间为 14 小时，也不得不向 OLED 型（近 16 小时）认输。
由于电池容量较小，完整的充电周期减少了 10 分钟，但 133 分钟的开机时间仍然相当慢（78 分钟后为 80%）。
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 47 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 53 Wh | Minisforum V3 R7 8840U, Radeon 780M, 50.82 Wh | Dell Inspiron 14 7445 2-in-1 R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 54 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core, 80 Wh | Lenovo ThinkBook 14 2-in-1 G4 IML Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, 60 Wh | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 10% | -7% | 35% | -8% | -28% | 79% | |
| H.264 | 841 | 953 13% | 940 ? 12% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 662 | 665 0% | 352 -47% | 787 19% | 608 -8% | 651 -2% | 822 ? 24% |
| Load | 89 | 104 17% | 119 34% | 134 51% | 42 -53% | 269 ? 202% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 日常使用中价格更低但速度不慢的 Surface Pro
新款微软 Surface Pro Copilot+ 基础版的起售价约为 1,000 美元，是一款有趣的设备。虽然据说速度较慢的骁龙 X Plus 的 CPU 性能略逊一筹，但 GPU 性能完全相同，可以轻松胜任日常任务。总的来说，Windows，特别是本地应用程序运行得非常好。不过，潜在客户必须注意，新的 Windows 版本不像英特尔或 AMD 芯片那样灵活，因为需要特殊的 ARM 版本。这可能会导致与自带驱动程序的应用程序、游戏或外围设备的兼容性问题。最好事先研究一下所需的应用程序/游戏是否兼容。
与几乎所有更昂贵的 OLED 机型一样，基本机型提供 16 GB 内存，但只有一个 256 GB SSD。微软还提供升级到 512 GB 的服务，但需要额外支付高昂的 250 美元。由于更换 M.2 2230 固态硬盘非常容易，因此最好还是自己更换硬盘。除此之外，没有其他维护选项，也无法接触到内部（包括风扇）。在日常情况下，Surface Pro Copilot+ 基本上是静音的，只有在持续负载的情况下（如游戏时）才会有明显的噪音。在这种情况下，铝制外壳在操作设备时会发热。
新款微软 Surface Pro Copilot+ 的基本型号性价比明显更高。在日常使用中，骁龙 X Plus 处理器有足够的动力，虽然明亮的 IPS 触摸屏不会受到 PWM 的影响，但由于无法覆盖 P3 色彩空间，因此图像质量与 OLED 屏幕相比还有差距。更换 256 GB 的小型固态硬盘既简单又便宜，用户自己就能完成。
除了处理器之外，最大的区别在于显示屏的选择，因为基本型号配备的是 IPS 触摸屏，而不是 OLED 面板。它可能无法提供 OLED 带来的主观画质（鲜艳的色彩和深邃的黑色），但凭借 600 cd/m²的亮度、高分辨率和 120 Hz 的刷新率，它也是一款出色的显示屏，不会出现 PWM 相关问题。尽管如此，微软并没有提到 IPS 屏幕并没有完全覆盖 P3 色彩空间。不过，有了精确的 sRGB 配置文件，这对大多数用户来说都不是问题。
另外一个区别是电池容量。基本型号的电池容量为 47 Wh，比 OLED 版本小 10%。我们认为微软是在补偿 IPS 屏幕带来的额外重量，因为两款产品的重量几乎相同。不过，这样做的结果是在某些情况下电池续航时间会稍短一些。
如今，Windows 平板电脑/二合一设备在很大程度上被制造商所忽视。虽然仍有一些商务设备，如 ThinkPad X12或游戏机型，如 华硕 ROG Flow Z13等商务设备，但 Surface Pro Copilot+ 的唯一直接竞争对手 迷你论坛 V3而 Surface Pro Copilot+ 的唯一直接竞争对手 Minforum V3 不仅价格更贵，而且风扇更活跃，电池寿命更短。
价格和供应情况
配备 IPS 显示屏的 Surface Pro 11 Copilot+ 基本型号在亚马逊的售价约为 1,069 美元。
注：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息 此处.
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+
- 08/10/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
