华硕ROG Flow Z13的回顾：疯狂--RTX4060在一个令人印象深刻的游戏平板中的应用

Name: Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V
Brand: Asus

有点不同的 "桌面"。

Nvidia新的、更高效的RTX 40代使之成为可能：高端显卡可以被装入越来越小的外形尺寸。华硕更进一步，简单地将RTX 4060安装在一个13英寸的平板电脑中，而不是13英寸的笔记本电脑。这款产品配有磁力键盘，从而使其成为一个可转换的产品。那么，我们现在可以在平板电脑上玩AAA游戏了吗？

Christian Hintze, 👁 Christian Hintze (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 04/30/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Convertible / 2-in-1 Gaming Geforce Intel Laptop / Notebook Tablet

Steam Deck、华硕ROG Ally等公司目前正在使小尺寸游戏PC的概念得到尊重。新一代CPU和GPU的效率越来越高，制造商现在正试图通过将强大的组件安装在越来越小、因而越来越移动的机箱中来覆盖新的领域。

华硕ROG Flow Z13是一款13英寸的平板电脑，拥有高分辨率的触摸屏和一个可磁力吸附的键盘盒。特别的是，这款不算太薄的平板电脑利用了真正的高端游戏硬件，而不是钢化和经济的办公组件。这个紧凑而强大的设备也应该吸引内容创作者。

我们最近还评测了Z13的特别版。这款产品有一个不同的外壳和一个RTX 4070 ，而前代产品只有一个RTX 3050 Ti 。当然，我们把这两款产品都包括在内，进行比较。

在这里，用于比较的竞争者领域很薄，所以我们不得不在前辈和特别版的基础上借助于真正的游戏笔记本电脑。为了比较RTX 4060 的性能，我们使用新的微星Katana 17 以及微星Cyborg 15 ，否则我们将其与去年的14英寸宏碁掠夺者Triton 300 SE (RTX 3060) 进行比较。

Test device courtesy of Asus

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V (ROG Flow Z13 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i9-13900H 14 x 1.9 - 5.4 GHz, 65 W PL2 / Short Burst, 35 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, 65 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), Geforce 528.49, Advanced Optimus, MUX

Memory

16 GB

, 8GB*2 DDR5-5200 on board, dual channel

Display

13.40 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 225 PPI, Touchscreen, native pen support, TL134ADXP01-0, IPS, glossy: yes, detachable screen, HDR, 165 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Storage

WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00, 1024 GB

, 960 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Raptor Lake-S PCH - cAVS

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm headset, Card Reader: microSD card reader, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 14.2 x 302 x 206

Battery

56 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 13MP camera and 5MP IR camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix IR camera for Windows Hello

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet RGB, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.551 kg, Power Supply: 479 g

Price

2400 Euro

Amazon

$1,599.99

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
89.1 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2023	Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	1.6 kg	14.2 mm	13.40"	2560x1600
89.4 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2023	Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1.7 kg	20 mm	13.40"	2560x1600
86.8 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2022	Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	1.2 kg	12 mm	13.40"	1920x1200
82.1 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2023	MSI Katana 17 B13VFK i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2.8 kg	25.2 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
86 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2022	Acer Predator Triton 300 SE i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	1.7 kg	19.8 mm	14.00"	2880x1800
82.4 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2023	MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2 kg	22.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

外壳--稍厚的平板电脑

即使没有肩带或特别版的近乎坚固的设计，Z13也很吸引人的眼球：背面大部分是铝，下半部分可以折叠成支架，还有一个有趣的、狭窄的 "观察窗"，可以看到游戏平板的内部硬件。

排气口位于两个角的顶部和背面。背面的主摄像头几乎不显眼地融入了右上方的总体时尚设计。

由于铝制底盘和一般的厚度，平板电脑本身非常稳定，不能被扭曲。支架的铰链也非常稳定，使平板电脑在站立时保持一个良好的位置。

键盘盖是用磁力对接的。当然，这个薄薄的底座的抗扭性要差一些，但也达到了它的目的。

对于一个13英寸的平板电脑来说，Z13相对来说又厚又重。考虑到强大的硬件，这并不令人惊讶，而且与大得多的游戏笔记本相比，该设备仍然令人印象深刻地小。总重量包括键盘，而平板电脑本身的重量约为360克。

然而，记录的尺寸是指没有键盘底座的平板电脑。有了键盘，宽度增加到21.1厘米，厚度约为1.8厘米，这仍然低于更庞大的特别版的尺寸。前代产品的厚度为12毫米，略微薄一些。

当然，其他平板电脑也更薄，如Apple iPad Pro 12.9，即不到一半的厚度。作为回报，它更宽，但也没有那么长。

尺寸比较

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE DIN A4 ❌

尺寸比较

Wacom MobileStudio Pro 13 i7 256GB Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Lenovo Yoga Tab 13 Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 DIN A4 ❌

设备 - 适合RTX 4090!

乍一看，左边只有一个带Thunderbolt的USB-C端口，右边有一个USB-A和一个耳机插孔端口。一个橡胶条覆盖了其他端口，即一个名为ROG XG移动接口的对接端口和第二个USB-C端口。XG Mobile是一个带有额外端口的底座，并容纳一个外部RTX 4090 。ROG XG Mobile的价格为1,999.99美元，，至少与我们的Z13 。

两个USB-C端口都支持DisplayPort和Power Delivery，因此平板电脑也可以通过这些端口充电。附带的较小的130瓦电源也是USB-C类型的。

当然，你必须在平板电脑上没有专用端口，如LAN、HDMI等。如果有必要，UDB集线器可以提供帮助，这也适用于游戏手柄的连接。至少有一个microSD读卡器。

左图：ROG XG移动接口，带USB-C 3.2 Gen 2、Thunderbolt 4

SD卡阅读器

microSD读卡器位于支架下方，所以在平板电脑模式下无法触及；你必须先展开支架。读卡器从我们的AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60参考卡中复制1GB的图像到桌面只用了5秒多。该读卡器的速度在比较领域中非常高，特别是AS-SSD基准中的读取率。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	189.5 (184.93^min - 191.52^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	189 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	108 MB/s -43%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)	95.9 MB/s -49%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	263.4 MB/s +26%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	211 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	209.84 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=87, last 2 years)	120.4 MB/s -43%

沟通

英特尔为AX211提供了Wifi6E作为Wi-Fi模块，这意味着它也可以在6GHz范围内进行通信，而且速度相当快，非常稳定。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1606 (1267^min - 1656^max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1584 (1451^min, 1476.81^P1 - 1630^max) MBit/s
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1569 (1259^min - 1667^max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (64 - 1921, n=242)	1231 MBit/s
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=147, last 2 years)	1227 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1679 (1634^min - 1714^max) MBit/s
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1675 (1509^min - 1726^max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1526 (1470^min, 1470.29^P1 - 1588^max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=147, last 2 years)	1390 MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=242)	1382 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1601 (1470^min - 1650^max) MBit/s
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1482 (1273^min - 1624^max) MBit/s -7%
Average of class Gaming (648 - 1878, n=68, last 2 years)	1429 MBit/s -11%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (385 - 1851, n=214)	1368 MBit/s -15%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1642 (821^min - 1658^max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (700 - 1857, n=213)	1493 MBit/s -9%
Average of class Gaming (853 - 1788, n=68, last 2 years)	1488 MBit/s -9%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1454 (1377^min - 1497^max) MBit/s -11%

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1601 (1470-1650)

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1614 (821-1658)

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1569 (1259-1667)

MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1606 (1267-1656)

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1674 (1509-1726)

MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1679 (1634-1714)

网络摄像头

在正面，一个500万像素的红外摄像头用于自拍，通过Windows Hello登录和视频通话。与通常的平板电脑一样，背面也有一个主摄像头，其分辨率为1300万像素。

视频和照片仍然 "只 "以200万像素或全高清记录，但网络摄像头的质量明显好于大多数笔记本电脑型号，特别是在次优的光线条件下。虽然有一些图像噪音，红色有太高的颜色偏差，但颜色和对比度仍然令人印象深刻。

该相机与特别版相同。我们的视频评论包括两台相机和麦克风的测试镜头。

ColorChecker Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V: 11.33 ∆E min: 1.36 - max: 26.73 ∆E

安全问题

TPM 2.0已经到位，但其他功能，如Kensington或指纹传感器都没有。除了TPM，华硕还包括安全功能 "BIOS管理员密码 "和 "用户密码保护"，这一点我们很喜欢。

辅料

Z13配有一个键盘盖和130W的USB-C电源适配器，但没有其他配件。

当然，XG移动接口是一个额外的附件。它是一个集线器和电子GPU (RTX 4090)于一体，但需要额外支付1,999.99美元。

维护

当然，在平板电脑上玩游戏是非常棒的，但是当涉及到维护时，我们遇到了平板电脑与 "普通 "游戏笔记本相比的一个缺点：Z13不能被用户轻易打开。铰链下面至少有一个小的维护舱口，通过它可以接触到M.2 2230外形的固态硬盘并将其换掉。你不能给风扇除尘，更换Z13的Wifi模块或内存。

输入设备 - 带有键盘盖或触摸屏的Z13

这款平板电脑有一个电容式触摸屏，工作性能出色，还支持笔输入。然而，相关的手写笔不包括在内，，需要额外支付79.99美元。

键盘盖使用磁针固定在Z13的下边缘，并通过它接收背光的电源。

键盘以不同的颜色和三个亮度级别亮起。它既可以平放在桌面上，也可以稍微倾斜，这也会使打字的噪音发生一些变化。但一般来说，这仍然是适度的。

盖板键盘的稳定性自然要比固定键盘差一些。打字时打字板会有一点弯曲，特别是倾斜时，但仍在可容忍的范围内。至少1.7毫米的键程对这种类型来说是相当深的。反馈也很明显，所以尽管按键尺寸相当小，但打字还是很快的。

字母在适当的光线下很容易看到，但它可以更亮一些，以增加黑暗的按键和不太明亮的字母之间的对比。背光在黑暗中也有帮助。

触摸板当然相对较小（约10.5 x 6.1厘米），但具有良好的滑行性能，即使在非常缓慢的运动中也几乎没有动摇。

集成按键的行程很短，但反馈明显。右边的按钮声音大一些，感觉它的行程更深。

显示器 - ROG Nebula QHD+和500尼特

华硕改变了面板--而不是夏普，新的模型来自天马微电子，它位于中国和日本。13.4英寸显示屏的分辨率为2,560 x 1,600，长宽比为16:10，刷新率为165 Hz。

亮度非常好，在SDR模式下略高于500尼特，而照度（88%）特别是在右下角边缘有些下降。黑色数值几乎无法与OLED相提并论，但对比度还是可以的。

从黑到白和从灰到白的响应时间都很快。在我们的Z13上看不到屏幕出血现象。总的来说，我们这里有一个明亮和高分辨率的触摸显示屏。


509 cd/m²	528 cd/m²	526 cd/m²
513 cd/m²	537 cd/m²	515 cd/m²
501 cd/m²	500 cd/m²	472 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

TL134ADXP01-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 537 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 511.2 cd/m² Minimum: 27.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 538 cd/m²
Contrast: 1193:1 (Black: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.49 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.12
ΔE Greyscale 1.66 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.43

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 3)

	Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V TL134ADXP01-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.4"	Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM TL134ADXP01-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.4"	Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE LQ134N1JW54, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4"	MSI Katana 17 B13VFK B173HAN04.9, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Samsung ATNA40YK07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"	MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF AU Optronics B156HAN15.1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		0%	-17%	-49%	6%	-47%
Display P3 Coverage	97	96.94 0%	67.5 -30%	40.8 -58%	99.9 3%	42.3 -56%
sRGB Coverage	99.9	99.92 0%	97.1 -3%	61 -39%	100 0%	62.6 -37%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	85.3	85.17 0%	69.3 -19%	42.2 -51%	99 16%	43.7 -49%
Response Times		61%	-374%	-354%	79%	-177%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	6.5 ?(3.1, 3.4)	2.1 ?(2.1, 2.1) 68%	44 ?(22, 22) -577%	33 ?(16, 17) -408%	1.36 ?(0.68, 0.68) 79%	22 ?(9, 13) -238%
Response Time Black / White *	6.5 ?(3.1, 3.4)	3 ?(3, 3) 54%	17.6 ?(6, 11.6) -171%	26 ?(13, 13) -300%	1.36 ?(0.52, 0.84) 79%	14 ?(7, 7) -115%
PWM Frequency					367.6 ?(100)
Screen		-15%	-5%	-111%	-60%	-66%
Brightness middle	537	464 -14%	515 -4%	267 -50%	414.3 -23%	247 -54%
Brightness	511	455 -11%	476 -7%	256 -50%	416 -19%	234 -54%
Brightness Distribution	88	89 1%	87 -1%	93 6%	99 13%	89 1%
Black Level *	0.45	0.4 11%	0.35 22%	0.21 53%		0.25 44%
Contrast	1193	1160 -3%	1471 23%	1271 7%		988 -17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.49	2 -34%	1.6 -7%	4.7 -215%	4.68 -214%	3.78 -154%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.68	4.2 -14%	4 -9%	20.4 -454%	7.78 -111%	6.42 -74%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.12	1.2 -7%	1.2 -7%	4.5 -302%		3.94 -252%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.66	2.7 -63%	2.5 -51%	1.5 10%	1.8 -8%	2.16 -30%
Gamma	2.43 ^91%	2.24 ^98%	2.2 ^100%	2.12 ^104%	2.22 ^99%	2.33 ^94%
CCT	6772 ^96%	6832 ^95%	6939 ^94%	6552 ^99%	6207 ^105%	6906 ^94%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		15% / -1%	-132% / -60%	-171% / -132%	8% / -17%	-97% / -78%

* ... smaller is better

华硕指定的是100%的DCI-P3；我们测得的是97%。AdobeRGB有85%的覆盖率，而sRGB则完全覆盖，当然。

这台显示器的校准工作已经做得非常好了，并且有DeltaE值，即灰度和ColorChecker的偏差都小于2。使用Portrait Display的Calman Color Calibration进行手动校准，可以进一步减少偏差。我们的icc配置文件可以在上面下载。

再加上良好的色彩空间覆盖率，我们有一个非常适合照片和视频编辑的显示器。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
6.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3.1 ms rise
6.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3.1 ms rise
6.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在户外，Z13在没有直射光线的阴暗处定位良好，这主要是由于良好的亮度。然而，在直射光线下，反射表面很快就被证明是反作用的。

当从侧面看屏幕时，事实证明它的视角非常稳定。

性能 - 平板电脑？不，是游戏笔记本!

这不是一个典型的平板电脑，而是一个真正的游戏笔记本电脑，因为结合了一个酷睿i9-13900H和一个 RTX 4060以及16GB内存的组合不言自明。另外，Z13也可以用一个 RTX 4050、和特别版，在许多方面都不同，甚至有一个 RTX 4070.

因此，你应该能够在这款平板电脑上玩所有当前的游戏。同时，强大的华硕平板电脑也应该让内容创作者感到兴奋。

测试条件

华硕的游戏设备总是预装了至少两个应用程序。更新和服务信息可通过MyAsus获得，而性能设置则在Armoury Crate应用中进行。后者模仿了控制中心。

用户应该熟悉该软件：除了安静、性能、涡轮 和手动四种性能模式外，还可以选择切换图形、定制灯光、配置音频等等。如果你想做这些，你必须事先同意华硕的（匿名）数据收集。该应用程序还搜索更新的时间长得令人痛苦，而且搜索偶尔会无意中被触发。至少该应用可以轻松关闭并重新启动。

由于其类似平板电脑的特性，我们在性能模式下进行了所有的基准测试，但我们也提出了涡轮和静音模式的数值。

处理器

英特尔酷睿i9-13900H通常在平板电脑中没有地位，因为它更可能出现在游戏笔记本电脑中。来自Alder-Lage系列的高端Gen13 CPU拥有全部6个P和8个E核心，其时钟在1.9（基本时钟E核心）和5.4 GHz（单涡轮）之间。

根据性能模式的不同，PL1和PL2的数值也不同：

性能模式	PL1	PL2	CB R23 Multi
安静	20	36	8.686
性能	55	95	15.788
Turbo	65	95	16.811
电池	55	55	14.283

在Cinebench循环中，Z13最初达到了100W的TDP，但是在保持稳定之前，这一数值很快下降到55W左右。同时，在CB15的前两次运行中，得分略高，然后略微下降并稳定下来，而其他使用相同CPU的游戏机则更加稳定，因此随着时间的推移也会计算得更快。另一方面，在CPU性能方面，平板电脑和游戏笔记本电脑之间的差异明显很小。

在所有测试中，性能都是一流的，性能等级正好与i9-13900H你很难注意到这是一台平板电脑。

在远离电源插座的地方，CPU性能在Cinebench R15中从2908点下降到1875点，差异约为35%。

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2466 (2355.02-2908.24)

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H: Ø2295 (2246.31-2349.07)

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2829 (2772.58-2962.96)

MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014 Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2950 (2913.75-3025.49)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2914 (2871.5-3068.66)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming	82.2 pt
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	78.3 pt
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H	74.5 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H	71.3 pt
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H	70.9 pt
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H	70.7 pt
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	65.7 pt
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	63.1 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years)	21994 Points +22%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H	18682 Points +4%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	17959 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (11997 - 20385, n=28)	16813 Points -6%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H	15906 (14978^min - 15906.4^max) Points -11%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	15496 Points -14%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H	15229 Points -15%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	14252 Points -21%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	2038 Points
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H	2020 Points -1%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H	1917 Points -6%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H	1910 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=188, last 2 years)	1894 Points -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (1297 - 2054, n=26)	1887 Points -7%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	1805 Points -11%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	1758 Points -14%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years)	8352 Points +21%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H	7126 Points +3%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	6921 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (4935 - 7716, n=25)	6533 Points -6%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H	6108 Points -12%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	5905 Points -15%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	5506 Points -20%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H	5491 Points -21%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	792 Points
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H	779 Points -2%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H	734 Points -7%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H	733 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years)	727 Points -8%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (428 - 792, n=25)	720 Points -9%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	693 Points -12%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	679 Points -14%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years)	3440 Points +18%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	2908 Points
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H	2885 (2523.5^min - 2885.38^max) Points -1%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H	2779 (2140.64^min - 2779.32^max) Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (2061 - 3100, n=26)	2676 Points -8%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H	2407 (2251.36^min - 2406.88^max) Points -17%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	2349 (2246.31^min - 2349.07^max) Points -19%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	2155 Points -26%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	295 Points
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H	292 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years)	278 Points -6%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H	275 Points -7%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H	271 Points -8%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (211 - 297, n=26)	269 Points -9%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	258 Points -13%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	243 Points -18%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	250 Seconds * -30%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H	217 Seconds * -12%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	215 Seconds * -11%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (166 - 268, n=24)	205 Seconds * -6%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H	201 Seconds * -4%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	193 Seconds *
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H	184 Seconds * +5%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years)	169.4 Seconds * +12%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=185, last 2 years)	85738 MIPS +21%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	70948 MIPS
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H	70269 MIPS -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (45045 - 79032, n=25)	66435 MIPS -6%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H	64899 MIPS -9%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H	64146 MIPS -10%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	62324 MIPS -12%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	55420 MIPS -22%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	6600 MIPS
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=185, last 2 years)	6322 MIPS -4%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H	6279 MIPS -5%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H	6102 MIPS -8%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3665 - 6600, n=25)	6054 MIPS -8%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	5765 MIPS -13%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	5742 MIPS -13%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H	5590 MIPS -15%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years)	15098 Points +7%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	14102 Points
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H	14083 Points 0%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H	13796 Points -2%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H	12963 Points -8%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (9094 - 15410, n=26)	12649 Points -10%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	11289 Points -20%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	11041 Points -22%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	2003 Points
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H	1978 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years)	1898 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (1140 - 2043, n=26)	1895 Points -5%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H	1892 Points -6%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H	1854 Points -7%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	1793 Points -10%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	1781 Points -11%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years)	23.6 fps +20%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H	20.5 fps +5%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	19.6 fps
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H	18.7 fps -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (14.1 - 22.3, n=25)	18.5 fps -6%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H	17.2 fps -12%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	17.1 fps -13%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	16.1 fps -18%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	16.1 fps -18%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H	82.8 s * -105%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	56.8 s * -41%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 199, n=182, last 2 years)	48.1 s * -19%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (34.4 - 82.8, n=25)	47.6 s * -18%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H	41.9 s * -4%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H	41.2 s * -2%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	40.4 s *
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	39.1 s * +3%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H	0.47 sec * -16%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (0.4052 - 0.723, n=25)	0.4493 sec * -11%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	0.4438 sec * -10%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years)	0.4366 sec * -8%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H	0.4292 sec * -6%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H	0.428 sec * -6%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H	0.4253 sec * -5%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H	0.4052 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2908 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

214.51 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

295 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

6921 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

792 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

2038 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

17959 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming	96.6 pt
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	80.1 pt
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	79.4 pt
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	75.9 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H	73.9 pt
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	62.3 pt
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	61 pt
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	57.6 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=182, last 2 years)	21963 KRay/s +39%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	16924 KRay/s +7%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	15746 KRay/s
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	15140 KRay/s -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6788 - 19557, n=25)	15135 KRay/s -4%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	13601 KRay/s -14%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	12590 KRay/s -20%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	7594 KRay/s -52%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=182, last 2 years)	106952 Points +35%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	83437 Points +6%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	79015 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (22551 - 95579, n=25)	76236 Points -4%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	75181 Points -5%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	68900 Points -13%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	67187 Points -15%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	35010 Points -56%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=182, last 2 years)	4920 MB/s +39%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	3754 MB/s +6%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	3676 MB/s +4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (2491 - 4270, n=25)	3561 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	3542 MB/s
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2992 MB/s -16%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2773 MB/s -22%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	2698 MB/s -24%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=182, last 2 years)	117347 Points +3%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	113464 Points
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	113164 Points 0%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	111168 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (65121 - 120936, n=25)	105169 Points -7%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	103950 Points -8%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	84959 Points -25%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	78352 Points -31%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=182, last 2 years)	13290 Points +28%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	10888 Points +5%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	10412 Points
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	9702 Points -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6108 - 11631, n=25)	9675 Points -7%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	9125 Points -12%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	8557 Points -18%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	8421 Points -19%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=182, last 2 years)	53819 Points +38%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	41886 Points +8%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	38948 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (11283 - 48474, n=25)	37712 Points -3%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	36920 Points -5%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	32787 Points -16%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	31425 Points -19%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	20833 Points -47%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	132544 MB/s +85%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=182, last 2 years)	109208 MB/s +52%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3691 - 149377, n=25)	87238 MB/s +22%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	82978 MB/s +16%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	77608 MB/s +8%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	71745 MB/s
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	65015 MB/s -9%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	58525 MB/s -18%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=182, last 2 years)	1369 MB/s +31%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1193 MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	1045 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (789 - 1254, n=25)	1040 MB/s 0%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	1029 MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	919 MB/s -12%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	891 MB/s -15%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	818 MB/s -22%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=182, last 2 years)	11830 KRay/s +38%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	9055 KRay/s +6%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	8569 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3655 - 10716, n=25)	8215 KRay/s -4%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	8122 KRay/s -5%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	7364 KRay/s -14%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	6708 KRay/s -22%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	4417 KRay/s -48%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	48269 MPixel/s +10%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	43980 MPixel/s 0%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	43917 MPixel/s 0%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	43838 MPixel/s
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=183, last 2 years)	40303 MPixel/s -8%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (10871 - 50488, n=25)	39722 MPixel/s -9%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	36156 MPixel/s -18%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	34544 MPixel/s -21%

系统性能

Z13在PCMark 10中表现良好。它让其前辈落后约17%；而技嘉Aero 16笔记本电脑，同样的CPU只有6%的领先优势，这对一个平板电脑来说是相当令人印象深刻的！在日常使用中，一切都感觉非常流畅！

在日常使用中，一切也都感觉非常顺畅。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	8018 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years)	7813 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (7578 - 7884, n=3)	7696 Points +1%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	7626 Points
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	7620 Points 0%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	7160 Points -6%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	7098 Points -7%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	6335 Points -17%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	11499 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (11235 - 11539, n=3)	11424 Points -1%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	11132 Points -3%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	11088 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=162, last 2 years)	10836 Points -6%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10809 Points -6%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	10755 Points -6%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	10669 Points -7%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10097 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (9888 - 10222, n=3)	10053 Points 0%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	10048 Points
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	9931 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=162, last 2 years)	9909 Points -1%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	9882 Points -2%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	9785 Points -3%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	9308 Points -7%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	12766 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming (6807 - 18475, n=162, last 2 years)	12168 Points +17%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (10418 - 11272, n=3)	10774 Points +3%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10682 Points +3%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	10418 Points
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	9903 Points -5%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	9159 Points -12%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	6556 Points -37%

CrossMark / Overall
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	2108 Points +6%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1983 Points
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1971 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1874 - 1983, n=3)	1938 Points -2%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1937 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=144, last 2 years)	1910 Points -4%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1857 Points -6%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1798 Points -9%

CrossMark / Productivity
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	2033 Points +8%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1889 Points
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1877 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1779 - 1889, n=3)	1842 Points -2%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1820 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=144, last 2 years)	1809 Points -4%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1765 Points -7%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1718 Points -9%

CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	2195 Points
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	2172 Points -1%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	2165 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (2104 - 2195, n=3)	2152 Points -2%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2107 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=144, last 2 years)	2099 Points -4%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2013 Points -8%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1936 Points -12%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	2168 Points +28%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1869 Points +11%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1734 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=144, last 2 years)	1707 Points +1%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1689 Points
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1654 Points -2%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1651 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1548 - 1698, n=3)	1645 Points -3%

PCMark 10 Score		7626 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	74264 MB/s +10%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	73354 MB/s +8%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	67615 MB/s
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	66769 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=182, last 2 years)	65546 MB/s -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (37448 - 74486, n=25)	61864 MB/s -9%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	56679 MB/s -16%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	53391 MB/s -21%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	74642 MB/s +19%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	69882 MB/s +11%
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=182, last 2 years)	69486 MB/s +10%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	65453 MB/s +4%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	63054 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	62942 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (41599 - 75433, n=25)	62438 MB/s -1%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	61613 MB/s -2%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	75529 MB/s
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	73816 MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=182, last 2 years)	67309 MB/s -11%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (36152 - 88505, n=25)	65109 MB/s -14%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	63565 MB/s -16%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	63215 MB/s -16%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	56131 MB/s -26%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	50700 MB/s -33%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	106 ns * -24%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	101.7 ns * -19%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	101.7 ns * -19%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=182, last 2 years)	93.8 ns * -9%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	90.9 ns * -6%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	89.7 ns * -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (75.8 - 102.3, n=25)	89.3 ns * -4%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	85.7 ns *

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

打开网络浏览器后，第一个延迟就出现了，打开多个标签后，这种延迟就会加剧。播放我们的4K/60fps YouTube视频也会进一步增加延迟，尽管没有丢帧。最后，一个非常高的数值出现了，目前Nvidia驱动程序中的高延迟问题应该基本消除。在我们审查期间，Geforce 531.68发布了，但该更新并没有改变高延迟率的问题。因此，Z13在这方面肯定有改进的空间，特别是如果华硕想吸引专业人士。

另一项测试显示，在打开一个文本文件并将一个URL复制到剪贴板时，延迟超过5500us。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	9037.2 μs *
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2698.9 μs * +70%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2396.6 μs * +73%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1676.2 μs * +81%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	1474 μs * +84%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1219.9 μs * +87%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

由于可用空间有限，华硕安装了一个小型M.2 2230格式的1TB NVMe SSD。这方面的替代品通常比常用的M.2 2280 SSD要贵一点。西部数据SN740在我们的最佳名单中排名第110位。我们的最佳名单，所以它不是最快的型号，但它确实支持PCIe 4.0，也达到了目标速度。最重要的是，它一直能达到这个速度，至少在性能模式下是这样。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 5275 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4879 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 590 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 525 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 72.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 164.6 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 509 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1075 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	84.4 pt
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE ^-11! Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	83.4 pt
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	80.1 pt
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	73.1 pt
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	68.5 pt
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	68 pt
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	64.6 pt
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	57 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=164, last 2 years)	3477 MB/s +17%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	3289 (3207.89^min - 3289.31^max) MB/s +11%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (2970 - 3687, n=8)	3288 MB/s +11%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	2974 (2950.9^min - 2974.18^max) MB/s
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2762 (2451.7^min - 2761.95^max) MB/s -7%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2641 (2618.08^min - 2641.4^max) MB/s -11%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2578 (2552.79^min - 2578.03^max) MB/s -13%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	2252 (2241.23^min - 2252.02^max) MB/s -24%
seq write
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=164, last 2 years)	3818 MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	3478 (3234.47^min - 3477.88^max) MB/s +4%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	3338 (3184.11^min - 3338.46^max) MB/s
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	3266 (1415.26^min - 3266.31^max) MB/s -2%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (2521 - 4121, n=8)	3253 MB/s -3%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	3217 (2128.61^min - 3217.03^max) MB/s -4%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3115 (2904.62^min - 3115.38^max) MB/s -7%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2567 (2503.61^min - 2566.81^max) MB/s -23%
seq q8 t1 read
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6449 (5531.66^min - 6449.16^max) MB/s +26%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=164, last 2 years)	6318 MB/s +23%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (5076 - 5265, n=8)	5194 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	5134 (4615.2^min - 5134.25^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	5076 (4420.41^min - 5075.53^max) MB/s -1%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4719 (4052.12^min - 4719.01^max) MB/s -8%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	3629 (3340.34^min - 3628.78^max) MB/s -29%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	3345 (2561.25^min - 3345.4^max) MB/s -35%
seq q8 t1 write
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=164, last 2 years)	4859 MB/s +18%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4606 (4445.88^min - 4605.99^max) MB/s +12%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (4130 - 4824, n=8)	4562 MB/s +10%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	4482 (4457.08^min - 4481.82^max) MB/s +9%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	4130 (4116.86^min - 4129.71^max) MB/s
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3629 MB/s -12%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	3215 (3201.61^min - 3214.59^max) MB/s -22%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2813 (2739.96^min - 2813.36^max) MB/s -32%
4k q1 t1 read
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	83.2 (76.7^min - 83.24^max) MB/s +9%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	76.5 (73.98^min - 76.52^max) MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	76.3 (74.19^min - 76.34^max) MB/s
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	70.5 (68.62^min - 70.48^max) MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	67.4 (65.12^min - 67.38^max) MB/s -12%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (43.6 - 83.7, n=8)	67.4 MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=164, last 2 years)	65.9 MB/s -14%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	37.7 (37.23^min - 37.65^max) MB/s -51%
4k q1 t1 write
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	391 (388.2^min - 391^max) MB/s +124%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	286 (269.48^min - 285.84^max) MB/s +64%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	259 (255.34^min - 258.92^max) MB/s +49%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	239 (229.28^min - 238.84^max) MB/s +37%
Average of class Gaming (78 - 397, n=164, last 2 years)	223 MB/s +28%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	174.3 (169.24^min - 174.29^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	171.4 (152.13^min - 171.38^max) MB/s -2%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (85.6 - 301, n=8)	161.9 MB/s -7%
4k q32 t16 read
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2816 (2326.5^min - 2816.32^max) MB/s +256%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2769 MB/s +250%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=164, last 2 years)	2565 MB/s +224%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2116 (2103.16^min - 2115.54^max) MB/s +168%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	1846 (1842.83^min - 1846^max) MB/s +133%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (601 - 2300, n=8)	1039 MB/s +31%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	791 (762.43^min - 791.09^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	764 (761^min - 764.36^max) MB/s -3%
4k q32 t16 write
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	2751 (2683.65^min - 2751.16^max) MB/s +432%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2635 (2459.5^min - 2634.95^max) MB/s +410%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=164, last 2 years)	2128 MB/s +312%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1923 (1866.75^min - 1922.74^max) MB/s +272%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1556 (1408.86^min - 1555.81^max) MB/s +201%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (277 - 2441, n=8)	738 MB/s +43%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	517 (507.17^min - 517.15^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	513 (399.04^min - 513.31^max) MB/s -1%

AS SSD
Score Total
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	7472 Points +49%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=155, last 2 years)	6733 Points +34%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	6311 Points +26%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	5577 Points +11%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	5023 Points
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (2963 - 6460, n=8)	4375 Points -13%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	3393 Points -32%
Score Read
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	2592 Points +77%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2446 Points +67%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=155, last 2 years)	2440 Points +66%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2279 Points +55%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1468 Points
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (872 - 2658, n=8)	1404 Points -4%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1093 Points -26%
Score Write
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	3541 Points +24%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=155, last 2 years)	3109 Points +9%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	2861 Points
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2658 Points -7%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (1686 - 2898, n=8)	2303 Points -20%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2151 Points -25%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1835 Points -36%
Seq Read
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=155, last 2 years)	4948 MB/s +17%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	4220 MB/s
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (3913 - 4496, n=8)	4148 MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	4040 MB/s -4%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3920 MB/s -7%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	3136.99 MB/s -26%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	2903 MB/s -31%
Seq Write
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=155, last 2 years)	3759 MB/s +36%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3007 MB/s +9%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	2886 MB/s +5%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (1863 - 4258, n=8)	2857 MB/s +4%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	2754 MB/s
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2554.35 MB/s -7%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1863 MB/s -32%
4K Read
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	88.7 MB/s +32%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	74.2 MB/s +10%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	67.4 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=155, last 2 years)	65 MB/s -4%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (40.3 - 76.3, n=8)	59 MB/s -12%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	58.8 MB/s -13%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	52.7 MB/s -22%
4K Write
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	334.6 MB/s +41%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	249 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	238 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=155, last 2 years)	212 MB/s -11%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	207.87 MB/s -13%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (156.2 - 258, n=8)	198.2 MB/s -17%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	161.5 MB/s -32%
4K-64 Read
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	2213 MB/s +126%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1995 MB/s +104%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1890.81 MB/s +93%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=155, last 2 years)	1874 MB/s +92%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	978 MB/s
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (428 - 2132, n=8)	930 MB/s -5%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	637 MB/s -35%
4K-64 Write
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	2917 MB/s +24%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=155, last 2 years)	2524 MB/s +8%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	2347 MB/s
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2108 MB/s -10%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (1212 - 2388, n=8)	1819 MB/s -22%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1688.15 MB/s -28%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	1487 MB/s -37%
Access Time Read
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	0.104 ms * -126%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	0.102 ms * -122%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.094 ms * -104%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (0.026 - 0.104, n=8)	0.06525 ms * -42%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=154, last 2 years)	0.05551 ms * -21%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	0.046 ms *
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	0.028 ms * +39%
Access Time Write
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	0.182 ms * -911%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.096 ms * -433%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=155, last 2 years)	0.04751 ms * -164%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 (0.016 - 0.071, n=8)	0.03263 ms * -81%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	0.03 ms * -67%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	0.023 ms * -28%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	0.018 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00: Ø5053 (4209.82-5091.26)

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM: Ø4543 (2707.25-4716.49)

Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH: Ø2189 (453.55-6466.22)

图形卡

这款平板电脑包含一个Nvidia Geforce RTX 4060--唯一的问题是在超薄的外壳中。当然，你必须接受一些3D性能削减与平板电脑的形式因素，所以功耗被限制在最大65W（50 + 15 W动态提升）。

在3DMark中，通过Optimus切换到dGPU有时不起作用。如果你通过MUX切换到dGPU，重启后的分数会更接近于竞争对手。

就结果而言，Z13中的RTX 4060的性能比使用相同GPU的普通游戏笔记本电脑低约17%到18%。

与CPU测试不同，合成基准测试中的分数明显受益于涡轮模式。在这里，笔记本游戏玩家在性能评级中的领先优势缩小到只有4%!带有RTX 4070的特别版（也是在Turbo 模式下）只快了7%。

如果你将平板电脑与电源断开，3D性能会下降，但明显低于我们的预期，因为另一个Fire Strike ，仍然有17368个3D点，而不是电源上的20553个点。因此，你仍然可以在没有电源插座的情况下玩Z13，但问题是能玩多长时间。下面有更多关于这个问题的内容。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	95.4 pt
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13620H	87.3 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	80.3 pt
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	73.4 pt
ROG Flow Z13 Turbo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	71.6 pt
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	67 pt
ROG Flow Z13 Leistung NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	63.2 pt
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	32.1 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years)	43891 Points +56%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13620H	36323 Points +29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (28136 - 38912, n=56)	34832 Points +24%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	32783 Points +16%
ROG Flow Z13 Turbo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	30751 Points +9%
ROG Flow Z13 Leistung NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	28200 Points
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	28136 Points 0%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	13939 Points -51%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13620H	177440 Points +54%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (81407 - 180228, n=28)	149832 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=100, last 2 years)	144470 Points +25%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	142065 Points +23%
ROG Flow Z13 Turbo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	136766 Points +19%
ROG Flow Z13 Leistung NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	115191 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=193, last 2 years)	31461 Points +53%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13620H	27681 Points +35%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (20533 - 29656, n=53)	25748 Points +25%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	23000 Points +12%
ROG Flow Z13 Turbo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	22876 Points +11%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	21062 Points +3%
ROG Flow Z13 Leistung NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	20533 Points
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	10600 Points -48%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=188, last 2 years)	13142 Points +72%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13620H	10299 Points +35%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (7484 - 11451, n=55)	9936 Points +30%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	9513 Points +24%
ROG Flow Z13 Turbo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	8734 Points +14%
ROG Flow Z13 Leistung NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	7655 Points
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	7484 Points -2%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	4041 Points -47%

3DMark 11 Performance		26702 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		55913 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		17992 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		8065 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	35 Seconds * -25%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	28 Seconds *
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13620H	25 Seconds * +11%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	25 Seconds * +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (19 - 28, n=52)	23 Seconds * +18%
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=178, last 2 years)	20.8 Seconds * +26%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	61 Seconds * -15%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	53 Seconds *
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13620H	44 Seconds * +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (39 - 53, n=52)	43.2 Seconds * +18%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	41 Seconds * +23%
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=184, last 2 years)	36.9 Seconds * +30%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13620H	353 Seconds * -4%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	348 Seconds * -2%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	340 Seconds *
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	322 Seconds * +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (189 - 452, n=52)	311 Seconds * +9%
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=187, last 2 years)	293 Seconds * +14%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

从基准测试来看，Z13在平板电脑上玩游戏是完全可能的。然而，那RTX 4060只能消耗最大的55瓦，这一点很快就变得很清楚。更大的游戏机，如卡塔纳17采用相同的GPU有更高的TGP，因此取得了更好的结果；例如，上述Katana在Witcher 3 Ultra中整整快了28%。微星微星Cyborg实现了类似的速率，但其RTX 4060只能消耗45W。

在性能模式下，《远征5号》在2,560 x 1,440的16:9分辨率下仍有很好的可玩性，而Turbo 模式则能多挤出一些帧数。

毁灭之光2》在FHD和高设置下的运行速度为52帧，因此比使用相同GPU的笔记本电脑落后12%。在Turbo 模式下是56.7帧，几乎与RTX 4060的平均值持平。35 fps是2560x1440的结果。也可以启用光线追踪，但只能与帧生成（AI支持）一起使用，结果是36帧左右。

因此，几乎每个游戏都可以在高分辨率下以全高清播放，有时甚至是以QHD播放。对于一个平板电脑来说，这是令人印象深刻的。

性能模式	Witcher 3 FHD Ultra	Dying Light 2 FHD High
安静	67 fps	41 fps
性能	77 fps	52 fps
Turbo	83 fps	56,7 fps

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	98 pt
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	90.1 pt
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	80.2 pt
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	71.8 pt
ROG Flow Z13 Leistung Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	70.9 pt
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	60.1 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=162, last 2 years)	128.5 fps +67%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	104.7 (88^min) fps +36%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	83.2 (79^min, 80^P1) fps +8%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	77.4 (66^min) fps +1%
ROG Flow Z13 Leistung Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	77 fps
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	37.1 (34^min, 35^P1) fps -52%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years)	113.8 fps +48%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	112.1 (8^min, 62.5^P1) fps +46%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	94.8 (4.6^min, 62.5^P1) fps +23%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	89.3 (20.5^min, 55.6^P1) fps +16%
ROG Flow Z13 Leistung Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	76.9 (3.91^min, 47.6^P1) fps
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	54.9 (7.72^min, 37^P1) fps -29%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years)	120.1 fps +60%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	106 fps +41%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	96.1 fps +28%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	93.3 fps +24%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	76.9 fps +2%
ROG Flow Z13 Leistung Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	75.1 fps

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=178, last 2 years)	229 fps +69%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	185.1 (15.5^min, 136.7^P1) fps +37%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	174.8 (57^min, 127.6^P1) fps +29%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	137.3 (59.3^min, 93^P1) fps +1%
ROG Flow Z13 Leistung Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	135.3 (16^min, 97^P1) fps
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	68 (49.8^min, 52.8^P1) fps -50%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	156.3 (132.3^min) fps +12%
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 220, n=186, last 2 years)	151.2 fps +9%
ROG Flow Z13 Leistung Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	139.3 (121.8^min) fps
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	137 (116.9^min) fps -2%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	135.4 (113.7^min) fps -3%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	135 (117.4^min) fps -3%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	118.9 fps +15%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	110.3 fps +6%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 166.2, n=193, last 2 years)	108.5 fps +5%
ROG Flow Z13 Leistung Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	103.6 fps
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	96.8 fps -7%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	92.5 fps -11%

The Witcher 3 | Far Cry 5 | Dying Light 2

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming (40.1 - 449, n=119, last 2 years)	243 fps +70%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	206 (166^min) fps +44%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (110 - 229, n=36)	185.1 fps +29%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	145.6 (133^min) fps +2%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	143 fps
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	140.7 (125^min) fps -2%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	74 fps -48%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=162, last 2 years)	128.5 fps +67%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	104.7 (88^min) fps +36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (77 - 159.7, n=42)	100.4 fps +30%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	83.2 (79^min, 80^P1) fps +8%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	77.4 (66^min) fps +1%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	77 fps
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	75 (69^min) fps -3%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	37.1 (34^min, 35^P1) fps -52%

Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	134 (109^min) fps +41%
Average of class Gaming (34 - 218, n=100, last 2 years)	131.2 fps +38%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (95 - 148, n=34)	121.8 fps +28%
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	102 (82^min) fps +7%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	95 fps
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	59 fps -38%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming (71 - 194, n=80, last 2 years)	119.6 fps +68%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	99 (84^min) fps +39%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (71 - 111, n=26)	94.9 fps +34%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	71 fps

Dying Light 2
1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (52 - 174, n=10, last 2 years)	109.8 fps +111%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	64.7 (35^min, 45^P0.1, 55.4^P1) fps +24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (52 - 64.7, n=2)	58.4 fps +12%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	52 fps
2560x1440 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (35.6 - 121, n=9, last 2 years)	80.8 fps +127%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	43.8 (26^min, 34.2^P0.1, 37.6^P1) fps +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (35.6 - 43.8, n=2)	39.7 fps +12%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	35.6 fps
1920x1080 High Quality Raytracing
Average of class Gaming (19.8 - 83.9, n=10, last 2 years)	50.2 fps +114%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	30.8 (17.5^min, 18.8^P0.1, 23.7^P1) fps +31%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (23.5 - 30.8, n=2)	27.2 fps +16%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	23.5 fps

Witcher 3 帧率非常稳定，表现出典型的波浪特征（日/夜变化）。一个有趣的观察是，在Turbo 模式下，我们的Z13的速度似乎与特别版与它的 RTX 4070.

当查看日志数据时，在性能模式下，最大的65W并没有用完。在这里，GPU从电源吸取的最大功率为55W，平均功率略低于50W。GPU加热到64℃左右，平均时钟频率为1.9GHz。内存时钟在1,400和1,750MHz之间波动。

Witcher 3 FPS chart

ROG Flow Z13 Leistung i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø76.3 (72-82)

Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø83.2 (79-91)

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø37.1 (34-40)

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø92.2 (89-98)

MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø75.3 (71-79)

ROG Flow Z13 Turbo i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø82.9 (81-86)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	183.4	173.1	144	76.9
The Witcher 3 (2015)	325	228	143	77
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	173.3	156	148.8	139.3
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)		100.8	75.1		56	32.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	154.8	129.1	103.6
Far Cry 5 (2018)	154	110	104	95	71
Strange Brigade (2018)	385	196.2	156.1	135.3
Dying Light 2 (2022)	80	64	52		35.6

排放 - 比一些游戏笔记本更安静

噪声

尽管Z13的外形很小，但与其他游戏机相比，它的声音并不过分。在性能模式下，我们在游戏过程中测得约41分贝。然而，在涡轮模式下，音量增加到47分贝左右。这对平板电脑来说当然很吵，但其他游戏笔记本很容易超过50分贝。

顺便说一下，内部风扇在安静模式下的转速约为36分贝。与Turbo 模式相比，你失去了约19%的性能，但你得到了一个23%的安静设备。

性能模式	风扇噪音水平	刷新率
静音	36 dB	67 fps
性能	41 dB	77 fps
Turbo	47 dB	83 fps

Noise Level

Idle		24 / 24 / 24 dB(A)
Load		38.61 / 43.59 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A)

	Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00	Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK	MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	Acer Predator Triton 300 SE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
Noise		-11%	-1%	-24%	-18%	-36%
off / environment *	24	24 -0%	24.5 -2%	24.5 -2%	23.8 1%	27 -13%
Idle Minimum *	24	24 -0%	24.5 -2%	24.5 -2%	23.8 1%	27 -13%
Idle Average *	24	24 -0%	24.5 -2%	24.5 -2%	23.8 1%	37.5 -56%
Idle Maximum *	24	36.5 -52%	24.5 -2%	40 -67%	30.6 -28%	38 -58%
Load Average *	38.61	41.3 -7%	41 -6%	48.3 -25%	44.2 -14%	56.3 -46%
Witcher 3 ultra *	41.24	44.7 -8%	41 1%	56 -36%	60.1 -46%
Load Maximum *	43.59	46.9 -8%	41 6%	59.1 -36%	60 -38%	56.3 -29%

* ... smaller is better

温度

特别是在游戏过程中，Z13的发热程度适中，至少在性能模式下是如此。在Witcher 3 Ultra模式下，我们测量到背面的热点为42℃。在压力测试中，表面温度上升到47℃。由于键盘只是停靠，掌托和WASD键始终保持低温。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


41 °C	42 °C	39 °C
36 °C	37 °C	34 °C
38 °C	37 °C	35 °C

Maximum: 42 °C
Average: 37.7 °C


43 °C	47 °C	41 °C
43 °C	46 °C	39 °C
37 °C	38 °C	35 °C

Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 41 °C

Power Supply (max.) 49 °C | Room Temperature 18 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


25 °C	26 °C	25 °C
25 °C	25 °C	26 °C
27 °C	26 °C	27 °C

Maximum: 27 °C
Average: 25.8 °C


29 °C	30 °C	29 °C
29 °C	29 °C	28 °C
27 °C	27 °C	26 °C

Maximum: 30 °C
Average: 28.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 25 °C | Room Temperature 18 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


38 °C	39 °C	36 °C
32 °C	34 °C	34 °C
36 °C	35 °C	34 °C

Maximum: 39 °C
Average: 35.3 °C


38 °C	42 °C	38 °C
38 °C	41 °C	32 °C
31 °C	34 °C	32 °C

Maximum: 42 °C
Average: 36.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 48 °C | Room Temperature 18 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).

	Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Heat		6%	-5%	-7%	0%	3%
Maximum Upper Side *	42	42.5 -1%	45.3 -8%	41.6 1%	43 -2%	47.5 -13%
Maximum Bottom *	47	42.6 9%	48.3 -3%	43.1 8%	46.4 1%	35.5 24%
Idle Upper Side *	27	26.2 3%	29.2 -8%	32 -19%	28.2 -4%	27.7 -3%
Idle Bottom *	30	26 13%	30 -0%	35.8 -19%	28.4 5%	29.5 2%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

CPU核心以4.1GHz的频率开始我们的压力测试，耗电量为95W。仅仅几秒钟后，核心温度就上升到86℃，之后就开始节流。最终，时钟频率在2至3.2GHz之间趋于平稳，功耗约为43W，温度稳定在75℃左右。

同时，在整个测试过程中，GPU时钟在750和2055 MHz之间强烈波动。内存时钟也非常不稳定，试图保持在1.2 GHz，但经常下降到200 MHz。显卡发热到64℃左右，但从未超过70℃。功耗也有波动，但平均只有23W。测量到的负载峰值为50.5瓦。

因此，如果CPU和GPU都处于重载状态，性能会有很大波动，尤其是3D性能会丧失。TDP只有23W，内存时钟频率下降到只有200MHz，清楚地反映了这一点。

	CPU时钟(GHz)	GPU时钟(MHz)	CPU平均温度(℃)	GPU平均温度(℃)
Prime95 + FurMark压力	2,65	1.368	75	64
Witcher 3 压力	382	1.931	66	64

发言人

华硕在平板电脑的下部两个角落安装了立体声扬声器，向外发声。由于声音不是指向正面，而是指向两侧，所以扬声器的声音不是特别大。

平衡的中音和高音是好的，缺乏低音就不那么好了。音频设备可以通过耳机接口连接。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 不是特别节俭

消耗功率

与其他平板电脑相比，游戏平板电脑显然不那么经济。尽管如此，与游戏笔记本的比较还是令人惊讶。例如，微星Cyborg尽管屏幕大得多，性能相似，但总体消耗较少。虽然在游戏中的消耗率几乎相同，但Z13在闲置消耗方面的表现并不特别好。Cyborg在这方面要节俭得多。外接显示器的空闲消耗明显较低，这表明明亮的高分辨率星云显示器消耗了相当多的电力。

Witcher 3 Ultra的消耗差异（取决于性能模式）列在下面的表格中。

我们测得的短期峰值最大为135W。这很可能会耗尽令人愉快的130瓦USB-C电源，但我们在压力测试中测得的平均消耗为102瓦，所以这里不应该有任何问题。

性能模式/测量值	风扇噪音水平	刷新率	消耗量
静音	36 dB	67 fps	76 W
性能	41 dB	77 fps	88 W
Turbo	47 dB	83 fps	105 W

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.26 / 1 Watt
Idle	8.5 / 12.4 / 13.3 Watt
Load	93 / 135 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.4"	Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.4"	Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4"	MSI Katana 17 B13VFK i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Acer Predator Triton 300 SE i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"	MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-4%	10%	-34%	-26%	16%	-35%	-63%
Idle Minimum *	8.5	8.9 -5%	8.8 -4%	12.2 -44%	7.6 11%	6 29%	11.6 ?(3 - 33, n=47) -36%	13.6 ?(2 - 39, n=154, last 2 years) -60%
Idle Average *	12.4	12.6 -2%	12.1 2%	14.9 -20%	12.3 1%	8.8 29%	16.1 ?(6.9 - 35, n=47) -30%	19 ?(8 - 55.6, n=154, last 2 years) -53%
Idle Maximum *	13.3	13 2%	12.7 5%	15.8 -19%	17.6 -32%	11.9 11%	20.4 ?(7.6 - 45, n=47) -53%	26.8 ?(9 - 101.1, n=154, last 2 years) -102%
Load Average *	93	92.5 1%	72.3 22%	85.22 8%	111 -19%	89 4%	93.1 ?(59 - 190, n=46) -0%	106.3 ?(32.1 - 201, n=152, last 2 years) -14%
Witcher 3 ultra *	87.8	104.4 -19%	77.3 12%	151.1 -72%	117.1 -33%	90.3 -3%
Load Maximum *	135	133.6 1%	103.1 24%	212.8 -58%	245.8 -82%	99 27%	210 ?(99 - 364, n=47) -56%	249 ?(64.5 - 418, n=153, last 2 years) -84%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø87.8 (74.06-115.04)

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø101.8 (62.77-135.16)

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø12.4 (11.507-21.908)

Power consumption with an external monitor

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø93.9 (92.96-94.41)

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø93.8 (93.77-93.92)

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø95.8 (81.55-134.22)

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø93.7 (85.04-94.38)

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø89.9 (84.1-92.53)

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø2.83 (0.0139-12.367)

电池寿命

华硕在Z13网站的规格表中指定电池为90Wh，这是不对的!就像前代产品和特别版一样，新的Z13安装了56Wh的电池，90Wh的电池很难装进平板电脑。另一方面，在网店上，电池被正确指定为56Wh。

这足够在降低亮度的情况下进行不到5个小时的网页浏览，或者在同样是150尼特的情况下进行5小时44分钟的电影之夜。

早些时候，我们赞扬了游戏时相对较低的性能损失。然而，相对较高的性能减少了运行时间，所以你只能玩50分钟的Witcher 3 Ultra。

的微星Cyborg具有类似的性能和类似大小的电池，在所有电池测试中持续时间更长，而卡塔纳17在类似条件下表现更差。

Battery Runtime

Witcher 3 ultra 150cd		0h 50min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 58min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		4h 04min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		4h 44min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 01min

	Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 56 Wh	Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 56 Wh	Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 56 Wh	MSI Katana 17 B13VFK i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 53.5 Wh	Acer Predator Triton 300 SE i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh	MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 53.5 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		10%	13%	-23%	26%	84%	42%
H.264	284	312 10%	358 26%			480 69%	413 ?(129 - 837, n=78, last 2 years) 45%
WiFi v1.3	298	398 34%	338 13%	176 -41%	374 26%	452 52%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=153, last 2 years) 26%
Witcher 3 ultra	50		47 -6%				78.3 ?(47 - 155, n=16, last 2 years) 57%
Load	61	52 -15%	72 18%	58 -5%	77 26%	140 130%	85.7 ?(41 - 173, n=116, last 2 years) 40%
Reader / Idle					486	817	567 ?(155 - 1290, n=66, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 平板电脑形式的游戏笔记本电脑，高性能

+ 带有RTX 4090的XG移动接口的端口

+ 更小的USB-C电源适配器

+ 对于 "游戏笔记本 "来说，有良好的摄像头

+ 支持主动式手写笔

+ 明亮的QHD+显示屏

Cons

- 连接少

- 维护/升级选项少

- 扬声器弱

结论--平板电脑上的AAA游戏是可能的

说实话，我们预计在强大的硬件下，小尺寸的缺点会更加明显。但华硕ROG Flow Z13证明，AAA级游戏现在也可以在平板电脑上运行。目前的全高清游戏可以毫不犹豫地播放。

当然，性能比具有较高TGP的大型游戏笔记本低一点，但权衡利弊后，还是比较小的。同时，关键的游戏参数，如风扇噪音或温度都非常适中，有时甚至是克制。

如果华硕能把相当高的dpc延迟控制住，创作者也会对拥有高分辨率星云显示屏和相对较好的摄像头的高性能平板电脑感到高兴。

你 "只 "需要做的是没有一些维护选项，一个体面的键盘和一个广泛的端口。

由于RTX 4060的存在，华硕ROG FLow Z13可以在全高清甚至原生QHD+分辨率下流畅地播放当前游戏。

到目前为止，这个级别的替代性游戏平板电脑很少，所以Z13目前占据了一个利基。你将不得不看一下一个同样罕见的13-甚至是14英寸的游戏笔记本作为替代。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

▶ load Youtube video

价格和可用性

在华硕的美国网店，只有Z13的RTX 4050版本似乎有售，，价格为1749.99美元。但目前已经缺货。建议其他地区的感兴趣的买家直接通过华硕的网店（如适用）查看哪些配置是可用的。

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V - 04/26/2023 v7 ^(old)
Christian Hintze

Chassis

86 / 98 → 88%

Keyboard

80%

Pointing Device

88%

Connectivity

71 / 80 → 89%

Weight

73 / 10-66 → 100%

Battery

61 / 95 → 64%

Display

89%

Games Performance

96%

Application Performance

92%

Temperature

87 / 95 → 91%

Noise

92 / 90 → 100%

Audio

77%

Camera

56 / 85 → 66%

Average

81%

89%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 1431 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 471132 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕ROG Flow Z13的回顾：疯狂--RTX4060在一个令人印象深刻的游戏平板中的应用

Christian Hintze, 2023-04-30 (Update: 2024-08-15)

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳--稍厚的平板电脑

尺寸比较

尺寸比较

设备 - 适合RTX 4090!

SD卡阅读器

沟通

网络摄像头

安全问题

辅料

维护

输入设备 - 带有键盘盖或触摸屏的Z13

显示器 - ROG Nebula QHD+和500尼特

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - 平板电脑？不，是游戏笔记本!

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

系统性能

DPC延时

存储设备

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

Witcher 3 FPS chart

排放 - 比一些游戏笔记本更安静

噪声

温度

压力测试

发言人

Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V audio analysis

MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF audio analysis

电源管理 - 不是特别节俭

消耗功率

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Power consumption with an external monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论--平板电脑上的AAA游戏是可能的

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison