微软 Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ 评测--搭载骁龙 X Elite 的高端二合一设备

Name: Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+
Brand: Microsoft

120 Hz OLED 和 900 nits。

第 11 代 Surface Pro 2-in-1 将赌注押在了高通公司新推出的 Snapdragon ARM 处理器上。此外，还可选配 120 Hz 高分辨率 OLED 触摸屏，在 HDR 模式下亮度可达 900 尼特。

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 07/01/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AI ARM Convertible / 2-in-1 Touchscreen Tablet Windows Snapdragon X Series

如今，Surface Pro 已经发展到了第 11 代，微软更新了其高端的 Surface Pro 2 合 1，为其配备了高通骁龙 X SoC。说起来，Surface Pro 搭载 ARM 处理器并不是什么新鲜事，因为自 Surface Pro 9 以来，英特尔和 ARM 型号一直并行销售。现在情况不再是这样了，因为新的 Surface Pro Copilot+ 没有英特尔芯片。与旧款旧的 ARM 机型不过，新的骁龙 X 机型不能采用被动冷却方式。

新款 Surface Pro Copilot+ 有两个基本型号。基本版售价 1199 美元，配备了骁龙 X PlusIPS 面板、16 GB 内存和 512 GB 固态硬盘。1499 美元起，我们有速度更快的骁龙 X 精英版(X1E-80-100），配备高分辨率 OLED 触摸屏以及相同的内存和存储规格，即 16 GB 内存和 512 GB 固态硬盘。1699 美元可获得更大的 1 TB SSD，2099 美元可获得 32 GB 内存，换句话说，内存是原来的两倍。

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Best Performance (Surface Pro Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 12 x - 4 GHz, Oryon

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

Memory

16 GB

, LPDDR5x-8448, dual-channel, onboard

Display

13.00 inch 3:2, 2880 x 1920 pixel 266 PPI, capacitive, native pen support, ATNA30DW01-1, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB, 1024 GB

, 899 GB free

Connections

2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, 1 Docking Station Port, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Qualcomm FastConnect 7800 (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 9.3 x 287 x 209

Battery

53 Wh, 7029 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: Quad-HD+ 10M Wide Angle + IR
Primary Camera: 12.2 MPix
Secondary Camera: 9 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, 65W PSU, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

870 g, Power Supply: 213 g

Price

1999 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Version	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
82.5 %	v8	07 / 2024	Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	870 g	9.3 mm	13.00"	2880x1920
85.7 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	04 / 2024	Minisforum V3 R7 8840U, Radeon 780M	928 g	9.8 mm	14.00"	2560x1600
88.2 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	10 / 2023	Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	1.3 kg	18.7 mm	13.40"	2560x1600
88.3 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	04 / 2024	Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core	1.6 kg	16.28 mm	14.00"	2560x1600
90.5 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	04 / 2024	Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1.3 kg	15.9 mm	14.00"	2880x1800
87.8 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	03 / 2024	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	1.7 kg	13 mm	16.00"	2880x1800

注：我们更新了评级系统，这意味着第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息请参见这里.

外壳 - Surface Pro 采用熟悉的金属外壳

微软没有改变 Surface Pro 的外壳。它再次采用了非常高级和稳定的金属外壳。银色外壳与黑色屏幕（包括边框）的组合形成了很好的对比。此外，这款二合一设备还有黑色、灰米色或宝石蓝三种颜色可供选择。

2 合 1 的质量仍然非常好，稳定性也非常突出。由于采用的是 OLED 面板（IPS 版本也不存在此类问题），因此没有吱吱作响的声音，图像瑕疵也不是问题。我们对内置脚架仍不完全满意。一方面，它的材料非常薄，因此有可能稍微弯曲。此外，如果把二合一手机放在膝盖上，薄薄的边缘很快就会变得令人讨厌。此外，铰链仍然有些松弛，但这一直是 Surface Pro 的问题所在。

平板电脑本身重 870 克，厚度为 9.3 毫米。与带有固定键盘的二合一设备相比，这当然是一个优势。不过，如果再加上一个键盘（约 350 克），这一优势就不再明显了。体积小巧的 39 瓦 PSU 重 213 克。

尺寸比较

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Minisforum V3 Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ DIN A4 ❌

功能 - 配备 USB 4 的 ARM Surface

在接口方面，左侧有两个 USB-C 接口（4.0），右侧是我们熟悉的 Surface Connect 接口，通过该接口可以对二合一设备进行标准充电（当然也可以通过 USB-C 接口充电）。底座上的接口可以安装选配的键盘盖。Surface Pro 不带 SD 读卡器。

同时，我们还使用 KVM 切换器将 Surface Pro 与显示器连接起来，并能顺利使用所连接的输入和 USB 设备。

左：2 个 USB-C 4.0（40 Gbit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式、电力传输）

交流

作为标准配置，高通 SoC 提供包括蓝牙 5.4 在内的现代 WiFi 7 模块（Fast Connect 7800）。与华硕参考路由器配对后，传输速度非常高且稳定。在日常情况下，信号质量没有任何问题。据微软称，新款 Surface Pro 的 5G 型号将于今年晚些时候上市。

Networking
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm FastConnect 7800
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1463 (min: 1282) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1705 (min: 1629) MBit/s ∼99%
Minisforum V3 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	584 (min: 532) MBit/s ∼34%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	899 (min: 885) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1421 (min: 1274) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1471 (min: 1330) MBit/s ∼90%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1711 (min: 1250) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1730 (min: 1508) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1775 (min: 1520) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1624 (min: 1247) MBit/s ∼100%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1253 (min: 724) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1427 (min: 1249) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1049 (min: 742) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1387 (min: 1264) MBit/s ∼85%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	985 (min: 790) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1486 (min: 1293) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1216 (min: 1009) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1484 (min: 1381) MBit/s ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1623 (min: 1402) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1664 (min: 1553) MBit/s ∼96%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1628 (min: 1529) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1632 (min: 1569) MBit/s ∼100%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm WCN685x
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1387 (min: 1345) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1627 (min: 1564) MBit/s ∼100%

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1463 (1282-1559)

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1705 (1629-1726)

网络摄像头

Surface Pro 一直配备有出色的摄像头，第 11 代也不例外。前置摄像头为 1220 万像素，可拍摄 4:3 的图像（4,032 x 3,024 像素）或 16:9 的 830 万像素快照（3,840 x 2,160 像素）。录制视频的最高分辨率为 1440p，每秒 30 帧。

后置 1050 万像素摄像头，最大分辨率为 3,736 x 2,802 像素，纵横比为 4:3，或 16:9，930 万像素图像，分辨率为 4,046 x 2,286 像素。视频拍摄最高可达 4K，每秒 30 帧。两个摄像头的质量都非常好，大大优于目前所有其他笔记本电脑。图像非常清晰，色彩也非常准确。Surface Pro Copilot+ 网络摄像头还可以使用著名的 Studio Effects。

ColorChecker Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+: 4.44 ∆E min: 1.13 - max: 8.64 ∆E

维护

机身后部还有一个小盖子，通过它可以非常方便地访问和交换已安装的 M.2 2230 SSD。要访问其他组件，则必须取下粘合的显示屏。此外，如有必要，还可以更换螺丝固定的电池。同样，风扇也可以进行清洁，不过这个过程需要花费不少力气。

保修

制造商提供 12 个月的保修服务，德国用户可享受两年的法定保修服务。在美国，制造商以 Microsoft Complete 的名义提供两年、三年或四年的延长保修（额外收取 149 美元、219 美元或 249 美元），其中包括意外损坏保修。但不包括现场服务，设备必须送至制造商处。

输入设备 - 全新 Surface Pro 柔性键盘

新款 Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ 在销售时还附带键盘盖或触控笔，但我们的评测设备都没有附带。这意味着你只能使用功能出色的电容式触摸屏。微软继续提供我们熟悉的各种颜色的 Surface Pro 键盘和 Slim Pen，我们测试了这两款产品与旧款 Surface Pro 9 的组合。

据说新的 Surface Pro Flex 键盘更加稳定，而且无需与 Surface Pro 进行机械连接即可使用。但微软对此的要求也很高，因为键盘（黑色或淡蓝色）和 Slim Pen 套装的价格高达 449 美元。

显示屏 - 120 Hz OLED

由于我们使用的是光面 13 英寸触摸屏（康宁大猩猩 5 号玻璃），分辨率为 2,880 x 1,920 像素，纵横比为 3:2，因此这两款面板具有许多共同的特性。IPS 面板的亮度为 600 尼特，几乎与我们的 OLED 面板评测设备的 SDR 亮度相当。根据制造商的说法，这两种面板都可以单独校准，亮度和色温都可以通过传感器适应环境。从根本上说，三星 OLED 面板的主观图像质量非常好，机芯也受益于频率的提高（120 Hz），但在明亮区域会有轻微的可见光栅效应。

我们的测量结果表明，SDR 的最大亮度为 580 cd/m²，这意味着制造商未能达到预期目标。尽管如此，这与旧型号（约 450 cd/m²）相比还是有了显著提高。除了黑阶较低之外，OLED 面板还具有典型的出色对比度。在 HDR 模式下，我们在小幅图像上测得的对比度高达 918 cd/m²，在几乎全白的图像上测得的对比度为 770 cd/m²。这意味着 Surface Pro 比目前许多其他 OLED 设备更有优势，后者在 SDR 模式下通常只能达到 400 尼特（HDR：最高 650 尼特）。不过，Windows HDR 模式仍然只能手动激活。OLED 面板的响应速度非常快，而且不存在光线或屏幕出血的技术问题。


579 cd/m²	580 cd/m²	584 cd/m²
577 cd/m²	580 cd/m²	585 cd/m²
580 cd/m²	582 cd/m²	584 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

ATNA30DW01-1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 585 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 581.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 578 cd/m²
Contrast: 14500:1 (Black: 0.04 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 0.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16

	Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ ATNA30DW01-1, OLED, 2880x1920, 13"	Minisforum V3 BOE, NE140QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 14"	Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV TL134ADXP01-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.4"	Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 14"	Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 ATNA60CL09-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"	Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U LP129WT2-SPA6, IPS, 2880x1920, 13"
Display		-2%	-3%	-10%	4%	3%	-20%
Display P3 Coverage	98.9	97.7 -1%	95.1 -4%	80.6 -19%	99.8 1%	99.9 1%	65.6 -34%
sRGB Coverage	99.4	99.8 0%	99.7 0%	100 1%	100 1%	100 1%	97.7 -2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	89.5	85.4 -5%	84.4 -6%	80.1 -11%	97.3 9%	96.6 8%	67.7 -24%
Response Times		-2152%	-1202%	-12282%	-91%	-40%	-360%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	0.32 ?(0.17, 0.15)	10 ?(3, 7) -3025%	4.79 ?(2.26, 2.53) -1397%	59.6 ?(27.8, 31.8) -18525%	0.8 ?(0.38, 0.42) -150%	0.49 ?(0.25, 0.24) -53%	13 ?(6, 7) -3963%
Response Time Black / White *	0.58 ?(0.29, 0.29)	8 ?(3, 5) -1279%	6.42 ?(3.29, 3.13) -1007%	35.6 ?(17, 18.6) -6038%	1 ?(0.43, 0.57) -72%	0.67 ?(0.37, 0.3) -16%	19.4 ?(6.8, 12.6) -3245%
PWM Frequency	480 ?(69)				240.5 ?(100) -50%	240 ?(100) -50%	29896 ?(55) 6128%
Screen		-323%	-314%	-199%	-206%	-47%	-171%
Brightness middle	580	512 -12%	473 -18%	501.4 -14%	371.6 -36%	387 -33%	455 -22%
Brightness	581	495 -15%	445 -23%	491 -15%	373 -36%	392 -33%	453 -22%
Brightness Distribution	99	91 -8%	89 -10%	88 -11%	99 0%	98 -1%	94 -5%
Black Level *	0.04	0.48 -1100%	0.39 -875%	0.32 -700%			0.38 -850%
Contrast	14500	1067 -93%	1213 -92%	1567 -89%			1197 -92%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	0.7	4.32 -517%	3.3 -371%	2.52 -260%	4.91 -601%	1 -43%	1.7 -143%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.1	7.04 -235%	8.93 -325%	4.87 -132%	8.33 -297%	1.9 10%	3.8 -81%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	0.6	4.22 -603%	5.4 -800%	2.8 -367%	2.2 -267%	1.7 -183%	1.5 -150%
Gamma	2.16 ^102%	2.31 ^95%	2.11 ^104%	2.17 ^101%	2.25 ^98%	2.25 ^98%	2.17 ^101%
CCT	6484 ^100%	6770 ^96%	7540 ^86%	6270 ^104%	6120 ^106%	6325 ^103%	6761 ^96%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *		4.17	1.09	0.45	1.59		1.5
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-826% / -530%	-506% / -379%	-4164% / -2014%	-98% / -125%	-28% / -33%	-184% / -179%

* ... smaller is better

我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件对面板进行了分析，作为标准配置，我们选择了涵盖 P3 色彩空间的Vivid配置文件。此外，还有一个 sRGB 配置文件，令人欣慰的是，这两个配置文件都校准得非常好，因为既没有色调，也没有个别颜色超过重要的目标值 3。由于我们的校准软件（i1 Profiler）目前与 ARM 版本的 Windows 不兼容，因此我们无法对显示器进行校准。

CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
0.58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.29 ms rise
0.58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.29 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.17 ms rise
0.32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.15 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

480 Hz
Amplitude: 25 %

≤ 69 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 69 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

新 Surface Pro 的 OLED 版本存在 PWM 闪烁。我们在最大亮度下没有检测到任何闪烁，但在 70% 到 99% 的亮度范围内，我们记录到频率为 120 Hz 的直流调光，这可能比传统的 PWM 更具破坏性。在频率为 480 Hz、亮度值为 69 % 或更低时，会出现这种情况。因此，对 PWM 闪烁敏感的用户最好选择 IPS 版本的 Surface Pro Copilot+。

Surface Pro 的屏幕反光很强，在室内也会出现恼人的反光。虽然亮度的提高和 OLED 面板的对比度有一点帮助，但在晴天或非常明亮的日子里，仍然很难在户外舒适地工作。除了从广角观看时会有轻微的蓝色色调（OLED 的典型特征）外，在视角稳定性方面没有任何限制。

性能 - 配备双核涡轮增压技术的 Snapdragon X Elite

全新 Surface Pro Copilot+ 的 IPS 机型配备了骁龙 X Plus(X1P-64-100)，而 OLED 版则始终使用功能更强大的骁龙 X Elite(X1E-80-100），其中包括双核涡轮增压处理器。内存容量为 16 或 32 GB，采用快速 LPDDR5x-8448 内存。

我们尝试进行了一系列常规测试，但有些程序与 ARM 版 Windows 存在兼容性问题。在任务管理器的 "详细信息"部分，您还会看到手头的应用程序是 ARM 版本还是模拟版本。

测试条件

Surfaces 设备不提供自己的能源配置文件，而只提供 Windows 配置文件。不过，与 Windows 笔记本电脑相比，微软设备的这些配置文件名称不同。除了 "最佳性能"外，还有 "更佳性能 "（相当于 "平衡"）和 "推荐"（相当于 "最佳能效"）。我们使用 "最佳性能"进行了以下基准测试。新款 Surface Pro 11 没有官方的 TDP 数据，但根据我们的能耗测量结果，我们假定它的能耗水平在 23 瓦到最高 30 瓦之间。

处理器 - Snapdragon X1E-80-100

我们的评测设备配备了骁龙 X Elite X1E-80-100该处理器提供 12 个主频为 3.4 GHz 的内核和一个主频为 4.0 GHz 的双核涡轮增压处理器。更多技术细节以及 ARM 处理器的能效测量结果请参阅我们的分析文章.

当然，最重要的是本地 Geekbench 和 Cinebench 2024 基准测试，但我们也在测试过程中进行了其他 CPU 测试，以了解模拟应用程序的性能。多核性能取决于（与 AMD 和英特尔设备一样）功耗限制，Surface Pro 的 X1E-80-100 功耗比 Vivobook S 15及其 X1E-78-100.不过，在单核测试中，二合一设备得益于双核涡轮增压技术，性能提高了约 15%。目前的 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U在单核和多核测试中也明显落于下风。

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100: Ø1696 (1626.02-2248.71)

Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U: Ø2038 (2014.3-2051.07)

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2457 (2370.09-2632.96)

Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U: Ø1494 (1433.95-1667.01)

Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø1966 (1893.49-2476.32)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H: Ø1227 (1080.79-1700.25)

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U: Ø1293 (1168.77-1576.35)

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3: Ø700 (640.9-773.99)

与配备英特尔酷睿 i7-1255U在模拟测试中的性能更胜一筹，而采用骁龙 8cx Gen3与新的骁龙 X Elite 相比完全没有胜算。在连续负载情况下，CPU 性能并不完全稳定，不过在 Cinebench 2024 等较长时间测试中，只运行一次就能明显看出这一点。在第二次运行时，R15 短测试已经显示出明显的下降，降幅约为 20%。在电池模式下，性能没有额外下降。

Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	956 Points +7%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	893 Points
Average of class Tablet (795 - 893, n=2, last 2 years)	844 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (621 - 927, n=5)	839 Points -6%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	748 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	564 Points -37%

Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	123 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (122 - 123, n=5)	122.7 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (109 - 123, n=2, last 2 years)	116 Points -6%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	108 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	100 Points -19%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	98 Points -20%

Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	14458 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (14234 - 14646, n=5)	14424 Points 0%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	14256 Points -1%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12765 Points -12%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12005 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	11571 Points -20%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	11144 Points -23%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U	9944 Points -31%
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=68, last 2 years)	3518 Points -76%

Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	2845 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (2751 - 2845, n=5)	2799 Points -2%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2591 Points -9%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	2537 Points -11%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	2454 Points -14%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2425 Points -15%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U	2356 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	2310 Points -19%
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=68, last 2 years)	1093 Points -62%

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	16285 Points +64%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	14380 (10957.3^min - 14379.9^max) Points +45%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	12972 Points +31%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	10856 Points +9%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U	10797 (9637.37^min - 10796.8^max) Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	9965 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	9927 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	9517 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (6772 - 10028, n=5)	8991 Points -9%
Average of class Tablet (3066 - 9927, n=5, last 2 years)	6650 Points -33%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	3567 Points -64%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1790 Points +36%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1774 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	1710 Points +29%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U	1709 Points +29%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	1701 Points +29%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	1656 Points +25%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	1321 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (1273 - 1321, n=5)	1296 Points -2%
Average of class Tablet (559 - 1559, n=5, last 2 years)	1141 Points -14%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	1130 Points -14%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	608 Points -54%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6417 Points +76%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5583 Points +53%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	5067 Points +39%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U	4176 Points +15%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	4033 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	3870 Points +6%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	3640 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	3616 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (2539 - 3802, n=5)	3380 Points -7%
Average of class Tablet (1175 - 3640, n=5, last 2 years)	2463 Points -32%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	1248 Points -66%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	703 Points +43%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	682 Points +39%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	665 Points +36%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U	661 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	655 Points +34%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	638 Points +30%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	490 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (470 - 495, n=5)	483 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (205 - 596, n=5, last 2 years)	430 Points -12%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	420 Points -14%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	199 Points -59%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2633 (2370.09^min - 2632.96^max) Points +17%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2476 (1893.49^min - 2476.32^max) Points +10%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	2249 (1626.02^min - 2248.71^max) Points
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	2024 Points -10%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	1984 (1854.94^min - 1984.03^max) Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (1476 - 2249, n=5)	1836 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	1700 (1080.79^min - 1700.25^max) Points -24%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U	1667 (1433.95^min - 1667.01^max) Points -26%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	1576 (1168.77^min - 1576.35^max) Points -30%
Average of class Tablet (433 - 2249, n=5, last 2 years)	1327 Points -41%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	774 (640.9^min - 773.99^max) Points -66%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	287 Points +16%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	264 Points +6%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	263 Points +6%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U	252 Points +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	248 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	246 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (230 - 248, n=5)	239 Points -4%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	222 Points -10%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	210 Points -15%
Average of class Tablet (119 - 248, n=5, last 2 years)	184.4 Points -26%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	119.1 Points -52%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	1059 Seconds * -202%
Average of class Tablet (351 - 1080, n=5, last 2 years)	649 Seconds * -85%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	382 Seconds * -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (339 - 510, n=5)	380 Seconds * -8%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	364 Seconds * -4%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	351 Seconds *
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	313 Seconds * +11%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U	310 Seconds * +12%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	239 Seconds * +32%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	237 Seconds * +32%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	199 Seconds * +43%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	66408 MIPS +50%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	57795 MIPS +30%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	49244 MIPS +11%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	44935 MIPS +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	44404 MIPS
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U	43441 MIPS -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (34299 - 45905, n=5)	42121 MIPS -5%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	37320 MIPS -16%
Average of class Tablet (12470 - 44404, n=5, last 2 years)	29850 MIPS -33%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	24505 MIPS -45%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6417 MIPS +20%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	5921 MIPS +10%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5432 MIPS +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	5359 MIPS
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (5242 - 5359, n=5)	5306 MIPS -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	5150 MIPS -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	5106 MIPS -5%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U	4938 MIPS -8%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	4611 MIPS -14%
Average of class Tablet (3915 - 5359, n=5, last 2 years)	4468 MIPS -17%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	3946 MIPS -26%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12738 Points
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	11207 Points
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	10014 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	9696 Points
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	9591 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	8821 Points
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U	8719 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	7522 Points
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)	2496 Points

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1981 Points
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	1894 Points
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	1805 Points
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1740 Points
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U	1735 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	1712 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	1699 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	1690 Points
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)	707 Points

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	20.1 fps +194%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	16.5 fps +141%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13.4 fps +96%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U	12.3 fps +80%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	10.6 fps +55%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	10.1 fps +48%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	7.57 fps +11%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	6.84 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (4.74 - 7.23, n=5)	6.47 fps -5%
Average of class Tablet (2.68 - 9.13, n=5, last 2 years)	5.76 fps -16%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	2.52 fps -63%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	121.5 s * -134%
Average of class Tablet (51.9 - 117.6, n=5, last 2 years)	68.5 s * -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (51.7 - 98.5, n=5)	61.8 s * -19%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	59.7 s * -15%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	52.5 s * -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	51.9 s *
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	51.3 s * +1%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	51.1 s * +2%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	44.5 s * +14%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U	43.5 s * +16%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	42.7 s * +18%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	1.013 sec * -58%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	0.756 sec * -18%
Average of class Tablet (0.532 - 1.012, n=5, last 2 years)	0.72 sec * -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (0.63 - 0.67, n=5)	0.652 sec * -2%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	0.642 sec *
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	0.52 sec * +19%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	0.503 sec * +22%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U	0.4881 sec * +24%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	0.479 sec * +25%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4738 sec * +26%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	0.4361 sec * +32%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

248 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2249 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

25.7 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

490 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

3640 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

9927 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1321 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

893 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

123 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	96.6 pt
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	77.4 pt
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	56.5 pt
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core	48.6 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	47.4 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	44.1 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	39 pt
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	38.7 pt
Average of class Tablet	29.1 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	16.9 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	25226 KRay/s +1055%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	20723 KRay/s +849%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	10809 KRay/s +395%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core	9685 KRay/s +343%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	8546 KRay/s +291%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	8127 KRay/s +272%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (2184 - 7339, n=5)	5756 KRay/s +164%
Average of class Tablet (2184 - 7637, n=5, last 2 years)	4306 KRay/s +97%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	2627 KRay/s +20%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	2184 KRay/s

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	106512 Points +1773%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	87120 Points +1432%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	55492 Points +876%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core	46507 Points +718%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	43652 Points +668%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	41353 Points +627%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (5687 - 26391, n=5)	18279 Points +221%
Average of class Tablet (5315 - 35296, n=5, last 2 years)	14851 Points +161%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	14113 Points +148%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	5687 Points

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	4764 MB/s +83%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	3896 MB/s +49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (2607 - 2949, n=5)	2790 MB/s +7%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	2607 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	2548 MB/s -2%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core	2507 MB/s -4%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2089 MB/s -20%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	2070 MB/s -21%
Average of class Tablet (785 - 2607, n=5, last 2 years)	1593 MB/s -39%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	1144 MB/s -56%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	120368 Points +73%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	95165 Points +36%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	83277 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	77892 Points +12%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	69762 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (68253 - 69762, n=5)	68917 Points -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	65820 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet (27210 - 69762, n=5, last 2 years)	48076 Points -31%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core	45867 Points -34%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	27474 Points -61%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	14835 Points +529%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	13143 Points +458%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	8191 Points +248%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	6855 Points +191%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core	5776 Points +145%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5095 Points +116%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	2357 Points
Average of class Tablet (1161 - 3974, n=5, last 2 years)	2346 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (1521 - 2357, n=5)	1950 Points -17%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	1257 Points -47%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	56839 Points +263%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	45793 Points +192%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	27112 Points +73%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core	23161 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	21250 Points +36%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	19899 Points +27%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	15669 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (10117 - 15669, n=5)	13537 Points -14%
Average of class Tablet (6842 - 16614, n=5, last 2 years)	11852 Points -24%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	7166 Points -54%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	169089 MB/s +138%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	71089 MB/s
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	70017 MB/s -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (39956 - 71089, n=5)	59937 MB/s -16%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	55011 MB/s -23%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core	48837 MB/s -31%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	45524 MB/s -36%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	42553 MB/s -40%
Average of class Tablet (1275 - 71089, n=5, last 2 years)	39096 MB/s -45%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	1279 MB/s -98%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	1088 MB/s +36%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	869 MB/s +8%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	802 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	780 MB/s -3%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core	732 MB/s -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (398 - 802, n=5)	646 MB/s -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	594 MB/s -26%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	588 MB/s -27%
Average of class Tablet (229 - 802, n=5, last 2 years)	531 MB/s -34%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	411 MB/s -49%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	13175 KRay/s +288%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	10812 KRay/s +219%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	5675 KRay/s +67%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core	4965 KRay/s +46%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4400 KRay/s +30%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	4345 KRay/s +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (2581 - 4044, n=5)	3531 KRay/s +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	3392 KRay/s
Average of class Tablet (1127 - 3718, n=5, last 2 years)	2498 KRay/s -26%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	1379 KRay/s -59%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core	49113 MPixel/s +27%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	47645 MPixel/s +23%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	45724 MPixel/s +18%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	44054 MPixel/s +14%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	38707 MPixel/s
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	37635 MPixel/s -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (28474 - 38707, n=5)	35539 MPixel/s -8%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	32278 MPixel/s -17%
Average of class Tablet (14660 - 38707, n=5, last 2 years)	28957 MPixel/s -25%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	13965 MPixel/s -64%

系统性能

在实际使用中，配备 Snapdragon 处理器的 Surface Pro 响应速度非常快，虽然我们在系统稳定性方面没有遇到任何问题，但并不是每个应用程序都能正常运行。如果你不是只打算使用日常应用程序（办公、浏览器、视频流），那么你应该提前做一些研究，以避免不愉快的意外。

在跨系统 CrossMark 测试中，Surface Pro Copilot+ 的表现明显优于最近评测的 Vivobook S 15在跨系统 CrossMark 测试中，Surface Pro Copilot+ 的表现明显优于最近评测的 Vivobook S 15，但仍略逊于直接竞争对手。在浏览器测试中，骁龙 2 合 1 遥遥领先于竞争对手。

CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total

CrossMark / Overall
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	1787 Points +24%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	1634 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1633 Points +13%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1566 Points +9%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 165U	1516 Points +5%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1499 Points +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1443 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (1356 - 1443, n=5)	1396 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)	772 Points -47%

CrossMark / Productivity
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	1748 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1577 Points +15%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	1552 Points +13%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1520 Points +11%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 165U	1479 Points +8%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1465 Points +7%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1375 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (1271 - 1375, n=5)	1318 Points -4%
Average of class Tablet (185 - 1797, n=63, last 2 years)	799 Points -42%

CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	1940 Points +27%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	1830 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1758 Points +15%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1726 Points +13%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 165U	1620 Points +6%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1612 Points +5%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1529 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (1492 - 1537, n=5)	1513 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (151 - 2350, n=63, last 2 years)	750 Points -51%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	1492 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1456 Points +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1401 Points
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	1356 Points -3%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 165U	1337 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (1237 - 1401, n=5)	1305 Points -7%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1293 Points -8%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1280 Points -9%
Average of class Tablet (205 - 1462, n=63, last 2 years)	797 Points -43%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (430 - 455, n=5)	442 Points +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	435 Points
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	307 Points -29%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	302 Points -31%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 165U	279 Points -36%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	268 Points -38%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	265 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	263 Points -40%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years)	149.6 Points -66%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Adreno 690, SD 8cx Gen 3	84.7 Points -81%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (295 - 324, n=5)	310 Points +5%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	295 Points
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	266 Points -10%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 165U	254 Points -14%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	248 Points -16%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	244 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	237 Points -20%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	228 Points -23%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=68, last 2 years)	104.3 Points -65%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Adreno 690, SD 8cx Gen 3	64.2 Points -78%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years)	3789 ms * -847%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Adreno 690, SD 8cx Gen 3	1915 ms * -378%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	575 ms * -44%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	574 ms * -43%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	542 ms * -35%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 165U	521 ms * -30%
Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	515 ms * -29%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	482 ms * -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (391 - 422, n=5)	406 ms * -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	400.3 ms *

* ... smaller is better

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	92990 MB/s +48%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	86739 MB/s +38%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core	84739 MB/s +34%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	69089 MB/s +10%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	67017 MB/s +6%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	65911 MB/s +5%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	63007 MB/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (44795 - 63495, n=5)	59272 MB/s -6%
Average of class Tablet (32539 - 68769, n=5, last 2 years)	54159 MB/s -14%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	40599 MB/s -36%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	119818 MB/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (58855 - 125604, n=5)	108255 MB/s -10%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	87812 MB/s -27%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	75519 MB/s -37%
Average of class Tablet (31342 - 124555, n=5, last 2 years)	73622 MB/s -39%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	59579 MB/s -50%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core	57847 MB/s -52%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	50399 MB/s -58%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	49784 MB/s -58%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	33013 MB/s -72%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	91878 MB/s +105%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	91567 MB/s +105%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	74984 MB/s +68%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	72329 MB/s +62%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core	63397 MB/s +42%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	62132 MB/s +39%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	49815 MB/s +11%
Average of class Tablet (33224 - 62397, n=5, last 2 years)	47049 MB/s +5%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	44742 MB/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (37270 - 45265, n=5)	43175 MB/s -4%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	173 ns * -2238%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core	142.6 ns * -1827%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core	129 ns * -1643%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, Radeon 780M	121.4 ns * -1541%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	111.1 ns * -1401%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	101.2 ns * -1268%
Average of class Tablet (7.4 - 110, n=5, last 2 years)	48.1 ns * -550%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	10.2 ns * -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (7.4 - 8.8, n=5)	7.9 ns * -7%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	7.4 ns *

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

由于 LatencyMon 应用程序无法在 ARM 系统上启动，我们无法进行标准的延迟测试。在播放 4K YouTube 视频时，至少没有出现丢帧问题。

大容量存储器

这款紧凑型 M.2 2230 固态硬盘来自三星（PM9B1），存储容量为 1 TB，初始启动后可用容量为 890 GB。这是一款中级 PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘，最大传输速度约为 3.5 GB/s。虽然可以达到更高的速度，但其性能足以满足日常使用。此外，即使在长时间负载后，传输速度也能保持稳定。其他固态硬盘基准测试可参见这里.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3664 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3035 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 314 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 395 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 58.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 114.6 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 655 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1145 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	85.6 pt
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	79.1 pt
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	71.7 pt
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	71.4 pt
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	70.5 pt
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1	68.1 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	62.4 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	59.6 pt
Average of class Tablet	47.4 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	39.1 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	3272 (3255^min - 3272.4^max) MB/s +30%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	2710 (2686.45^min - 2710.15^max) MB/s +7%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2592 (2555.51^min - 2591.66^max) MB/s +3%
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB (2497 - 2698, n=4)	2591 MB/s +3%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2526 (2409.21^min - 2526.44^max) MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	2492 (2463.73^min - 2492.26^max) MB/s -1%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1	2455 (2420.93^min - 2454.72^max) MB/s -3%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	2349 (2298.29^min - 2348.81^max) MB/s -7%
Average of class Tablet (1127 - 2629, n=5, last 2 years)	2070 MB/s -18%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	1216 (1188.74^min - 1215.93^max) MB/s -52%
seq write
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3439 (3052.4^min - 3438.7^max) MB/s +53%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1	3091 (808.18^min - 3091.2^max) MB/s +37%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	2894 (2826.12^min - 2894.2^max) MB/s +29%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	2793 (2645.51^min - 2792.57^max) MB/s +24%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	2472 (2455.35^min - 2471.91^max) MB/s +10%
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB (1892 - 2642, n=4)	2338 MB/s +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2249 (2116.03^min - 2249.31^max) MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1954 (1874.02^min - 1954.13^max) MB/s -13%
Average of class Tablet (238 - 2725, n=5, last 2 years)	1699 MB/s -24%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	1466 (1421.15^min - 1466.12^max) MB/s -35%
seq q8 t1 read
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	6170 (4243.59^min - 6169.61^max) MB/s +69%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1	5033 (4388.11^min - 5032.75^max) MB/s +38%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4789 (4345.83^min - 4788.71^max) MB/s +31%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	4496 (3873.86^min - 4495.69^max) MB/s +23%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	3660 (3274.24^min - 3659.74^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB (3622 - 3660, n=4)	3641 MB/s -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	3623 (3166.28^min - 3622.92^max) MB/s -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	3499 (2732.17^min - 3499.31^max) MB/s -4%
Average of class Tablet (1075 - 4955, n=5, last 2 years)	3108 MB/s -15%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	2620 (2449.47^min - 2619.97^max) MB/s -28%
seq q8 t1 write
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	4600 (4540.12^min - 4600.08^max) MB/s +54%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1	3981 (3754.15^min - 3980.6^max) MB/s +33%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3678 (3661^min - 3677.55^max) MB/s +23%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	3466 (3283.86^min - 3466.16^max) MB/s +16%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2986 (2958.24^min - 2986.34^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB (2408 - 2986, n=4)	2776 MB/s -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	2510 (2494.14^min - 2510.29^max) MB/s -16%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	2410 (2398.51^min - 2410.26^max) MB/s -19%
Average of class Tablet (238 - 3623, n=5, last 2 years)	2389 MB/s -20%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	1620 (1607.05^min - 1619.51^max) MB/s -46%
4k q1 t1 read
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	79.7 (72.36^min - 79.71^max) MB/s +22%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	79.7 (78.91^min - 79.65^max) MB/s +22%
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB (59.3 - 83.2, n=4)	70.8 MB/s +8%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	65.4 (64.45^min - 65.38^max) MB/s
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	61.1 (60.51^min - 61.07^max) MB/s -7%
Average of class Tablet (40.3 - 65.4, n=5, last 2 years)	55.7 MB/s -15%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	54.6 (52.91^min - 54.56^max) MB/s -17%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	52.3 (51.34^min - 52.3^max) MB/s -20%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1	44.9 (44.41^min - 44.94^max) MB/s -31%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	39 (33.35^min - 38.96^max) MB/s -40%
4k q1 t1 write
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	183 (179.84^min - 182.98^max) MB/s +50%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	179.8 (169.14^min - 179.81^max) MB/s +47%
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB (80.9 - 239, n=4)	168.7 MB/s +38%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	161.1 (150.7^min - 161.06^max) MB/s +32%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1	137.1 (133.04^min - 137.08^max) MB/s +12%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	125.6 (122.85^min - 125.61^max) MB/s +3%
Average of class Tablet (49.4 - 187.5, n=5, last 2 years)	122.3 MB/s 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	122 (120.81^min - 121.95^max) MB/s
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	120.7 (116.51^min - 120.67^max) MB/s -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	48.4 (39.33^min - 48.35^max) MB/s -60%
4k q32 t16 read
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1830 (1819.65^min - 1829.74^max) MB/s +82%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	1612 (1101.25^min - 1612.03^max) MB/s +61%
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB (460 - 2116, n=4)	1423 MB/s +42%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1003 (972.92^min - 1003.23^max) MB/s
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	978 (957.59^min - 977.78^max) MB/s -2%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	869 (699.62^min - 869.07^max) MB/s -13%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	774 (729.42^min - 773.82^max) MB/s -23%
Average of class Tablet (174 - 1069, n=5, last 2 years)	726 MB/s -28%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	665 (643^min - 665.11^max) MB/s -34%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1	358 (353.65^min - 357.92^max) MB/s -64%
4k q32 t16 write
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1868 (1861.35^min - 1868.28^max) MB/s +196%
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB (192.1 - 1923, n=4)	1155 MB/s +83%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	631 (619.64^min - 630.94^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	621 (600.24^min - 620.67^max) MB/s -2%
Average of class Tablet (212 - 642, n=5, last 2 years)	439 MB/s -30%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	413 (402.24^min - 412.89^max) MB/s -35%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	385 (378.02^min - 385.27^max) MB/s -39%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1	378 (301.45^min - 377.68^max) MB/s -40%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	371 (347.99^min - 371.14^max) MB/s -41%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	354 (346.58^min - 354.16^max) MB/s -44%

AS SSD
Score Total
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	5403 Points +141%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	5210 Points +132%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4762 Points +112%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	4111 Points +83%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1	3843 Points +71%
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB (2242 - 5577, n=3)	3625 Points +62%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	2783 Points +24%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2242 Points
Average of class Tablet (637 - 2961, n=5, last 2 years)	1997 Points -11%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	1699 Points -24%
Score Read
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	2027 Points +147%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	1912 Points +133%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1315 Points +60%
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB (812 - 2279, n=3)	1304 Points +59%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1	1111 Points +35%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	1084 Points +32%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	841 Points +3%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	820 Points
Average of class Tablet (288 - 1019, n=5, last 2 years)	684 Points -17%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	476 Points -42%
Score Write
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2829 Points +179%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	2601 Points +156%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	2476 Points +144%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1	2221 Points +119%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	2182 Points +115%
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB (1015 - 2151, n=3)	1680 Points +66%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1551 Points +53%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	1021 Points +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	1015 Points
Average of class Tablet (226 - 1638, n=5, last 2 years)	999 Points -2%
Seq Read
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1	3809.37 MB/s +32%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3771 MB/s +31%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	3662.16 MB/s +27%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	3176 MB/s +10%
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB (2793 - 3137, n=3)	2938 MB/s +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2885 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	2802 MB/s -3%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	2678.01 MB/s -7%
Average of class Tablet (1072 - 4037, n=5, last 2 years)	2605 MB/s -10%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	2318 MB/s -20%
Seq Write
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2439 MB/s +15%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1	2302.92 MB/s +8%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	2239.4 MB/s +5%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	2211 MB/s +4%
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB (1759 - 2554, n=3)	2147 MB/s +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	2127 MB/s
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	1968.11 MB/s -7%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1692 MB/s -20%
Average of class Tablet (227 - 2127, n=5, last 2 years)	1501 MB/s -29%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	1233 MB/s -42%
4K Read
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	69.2 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	68.5 MB/s -1%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	61.94 MB/s -10%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1	61.05 MB/s -12%
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB (34.6 - 74.2, n=3)	59.3 MB/s -14%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	54.3 MB/s -22%
Average of class Tablet (28.7 - 69.2, n=5, last 2 years)	52.8 MB/s -24%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	51.17 MB/s -26%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	39.19 MB/s -43%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	34.2 MB/s -51%
4K Write
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	201 MB/s +9%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	184 MB/s
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1	183.52 MB/s 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	164.1 MB/s -11%
Average of class Tablet (65.2 - 199.4, n=5, last 2 years)	157.3 MB/s -15%
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB (66.5 - 208, n=3)	152.8 MB/s -17%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	149.03 MB/s -19%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	147.09 MB/s -20%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	110.01 MB/s -40%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	66.4 MB/s -64%
4K-64 Read
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1641 MB/s +254%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	1506.55 MB/s +225%
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB (463 - 1891, n=3)	951 MB/s +105%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	884 MB/s +91%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	754.04 MB/s +63%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1	668.73 MB/s +44%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	509.42 MB/s +10%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	463 MB/s
Average of class Tablet (137.9 - 549, n=5, last 2 years)	371 MB/s -20%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	210 MB/s -55%
4K-64 Write
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2384 MB/s +286%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	2293.73 MB/s +271%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	2103.1 MB/s +240%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1	1807.57 MB/s +192%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	1797 MB/s +191%
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB (618 - 1688, n=3)	1312 MB/s +112%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1234.89 MB/s +100%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	832 MB/s +35%
Average of class Tablet (48.7 - 1275, n=5, last 2 years)	692 MB/s +12%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	618 MB/s
Access Time Read
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	0.16 ms * -357%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1	0.102 ms * -191%
Average of class Tablet (0.035 - 0.163, n=5, last 2 years)	0.0892 ms * -155%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	0.086 ms * -146%
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB (0.035 - 0.109, n=3)	0.082 ms * -134%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	0.062 ms * -77%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.055 ms * -57%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	0.05 ms * -43%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	0.035 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	0.034 ms * +3%
Access Time Write
Average of class Tablet (0.03 - 0.344, n=5, last 2 years)	0.131 ms * -323%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	0.12 ms * -287%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	0.074 ms * -139%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	0.059 ms * -90%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1	0.055 ms * -77%
Average Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB (0.03 - 0.049, n=3)	0.03667 ms * -18%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	0.032 ms * -3%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	0.031 ms *
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	0.03 ms * +3%
Minisforum V3 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.022 ms * +29%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3591 (3299.66-3663.74)

图形卡

Snapdragon X Elite 的图形处理由 Adreno GPU 完成。配备的 X1E-80-100 是目前可用 GPU 中速度较慢的型号之一，主频为 1.2GHz。在我们的分析文章中中，我们对 GPU 性能进行了广泛的研究，在本地测试中，GPU 的性能介于 Radeon 780M 和 Intel Arc 图形处理器之间。在 Windows 的日常正常使用中，iGPU 表现出色，播放高分辨率视频时也毫无问题。

当你想玩游戏时，情况就变得棘手了。有些游戏根本无法启动（例如《F1 23》），或者在高设置下出现图像错误（《全面战争：法老王》或《古墓丽影》）。此外，在《赛博朋克 2077》中，我们遇到了多次崩溃。超高分辨率功能负责升频，但大多数游戏都不支持该功能，例如，我们只能在《Witcher 3 》中使用该功能。该功能提高了性能（例如，1080p高分辨率从 40 帧/秒提高到 57 帧/秒），但图像质量没有明显下降。

在长时间负载情况下，游戏性能保持稳定，电池寿命也是如此。更多 GPU 基准测试可在我们的技术部分.

3DMark | 3DMark 11 | Geekbench 6.3

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	15020 Points +140%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	6323 Points +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	6248 Points
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (5522 - 6430, n=6)	6189 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	5744 Points -8%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U	3692 Points -41%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Adreno 690, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	3067 Points -51%
Average of class Tablet (72 - 8889, n=71, last 2 years)	1543 Points -75%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	21810 Points +247%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	8366 Points +33%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	8164 Points +30%
Minisforum V3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	7818 Points +24%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	6446 Points +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	6294 Points
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (5560 - 6454, n=11)	6170 Points -2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U	5517 Points -12%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 7 165U	5468 Points -13%
Average of class Tablet (1781 - 6410, n=4, last 2 years)	4489 Points -29%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Adreno 690, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	3028 Points -52%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	8232 Points +384%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	3000 Points +76%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2906 Points +71%
Minisforum V3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	2780 Points +64%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 7 165U	2067 Points +22%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	1700 Points
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	1698 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (1546 - 1739, n=11)	1690 Points -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U	1606 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet (561 - 1715, n=4, last 2 years)	1245 Points -27%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	28708 Points +355%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13716 Points +117%
Minisforum V3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	12345 Points +96%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	11528 Points +83%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 7 165U	7055 Points +12%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	6352 Points +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	6311 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U	6251 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (4823 - 6515, n=10)	6119 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet (2912 - 6429, n=5, last 2 years)	4636 Points -27%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Adreno 690, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	2898 Points -54%

Geekbench 6.3
GPU OpenCL
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	76525 Points +285%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	35296 Points +78%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	31245 Points +57%
Minisforum V3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	27982 Points +41%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	20551 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (19879 - 20906, n=10)	20438 Points +3%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	19879 Points
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 7 165U	17837 Points -10%
Average of class Tablet (343 - 20185, n=35, last 2 years)	4275 Points -78%
GPU Vulkan
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	75631 Points +224%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	32397 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	28903 Points +24%
Minisforum V3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	28404 Points +22%
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (23174 - 24430, n=10)	23719 Points +2%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100	23712 Points +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	23348 Points
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 7 165U	18064 Points -23%
Average of class Tablet (433 - 23831, n=34, last 2 years)	4779 Points -80%

3DMark 11 Performance		6846 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		5911 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		1893 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score		477 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score		2012 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score		1972 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender: v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | v3.3 Classroom CUDA | v3.3 Classroom CPU

Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	25 Seconds *

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	52 Seconds *

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Tablet (637 - 2098, n=5, last 2 years)	1225 Seconds * -92%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U	730 Seconds * -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	671 Seconds * -5%
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (545 - 899, n=9)	667 Seconds * -5%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100	637 Seconds *
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), Intel Core Ultra 7 165U	592 Seconds * +7%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	497 Seconds * +22%
Minisforum V3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U	383 Seconds * +40%
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	330 Seconds * +48%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	100 pt
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	39 pt
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	34.1 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	29.7 pt
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 ^-1! Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	28.2 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ ^-1! Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	26.9 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM ^-4! Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690	26.4 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	25.3 pt
Average of class Tablet	21.6 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	87.4 (79^min, 79.3^P1) fps +365%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	30.4 (15.4^min, 16.7^P0.1, 18.9^P1) fps +62%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	24.5 (21^min) fps +30%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	18.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	18.3 (9^min, 12^P1) fps -3%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	17.9 (15^min) fps -5%
Average of class Tablet (8.5 - 20, n=4, last 2 years)	14.5 fps -23%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	12.8 (12^min, 12^P1) fps -32%

GTA V - 1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	160 (4.75^min, 100^P1) fps +242%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	64.1 (2.21^min, 40^P1) fps +37%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	46.8 (0.673^min, 14.3^P1) fps
Average of class Tablet (18.5 - 49.2, n=3, last 2 years)	38.2 fps -18%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	36.9 (4.48^min, 23.3^P1) fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	31 (1.31^min, 13.7^P1) fps -34%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	24.7 (11^min, 18.2^P1) fps -47%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	82.9 fps +438%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	27.1 fps +76%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	24.1 fps +56%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	22.2 fps +44%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	18.2 fps +18%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	16.8 fps +9%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	15.4 fps
Average of class Tablet (7.29 - 15.7, n=4, last 2 years)	12.5 fps -19%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	157.9 (38.7^min, 116^P1) fps +327%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	45.6 (5^min, 16.5^P1) fps +23%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	44.3 (5.6^min, 9.57^P1) fps +20%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	40 fps +8%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	37 fps
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	33.3 (21.1^min, 24.8^P1) fps -10%
Average of class Tablet (17.9 - 37, n=3, last 2 years)	30.6 fps -17%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	26.2 (7.4^min, 9.36^P1) fps -29%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	123.2 (108.8^min) fps +139%
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	73.2 (64.1^min) fps +42%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	63.6 (41.5^min) fps +23%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	58.7 (42.1^min) fps +14%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	57.3 (44^min) fps +11%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	57 (48^min) fps +10%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	51.6 (40.6^min) fps
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690	40.7 (35.3^min) fps -21%
Average of class Tablet (13.2 - 51.6, n=5, last 2 years)	39.1 fps -24%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	82.3 fps
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	36.9 fps
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	31.6 fps
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	31.5 fps
Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	31.5 fps
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	25.3 fps
Average of class Tablet (16.1 - 20.6, n=3, last 2 years)	18.9 fps
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690	16.3 fps

Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom Liberty FPS diagram

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS: Ø11.4 (10.1-14)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)	86.3	82.9	46.8
The Witcher 3 (2015)	112	68	40	18.8
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	72.4	55.9	55.1	51.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	53.6	25	15.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	29.5
Strange Brigade (2018)	68	49	42	37
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	57	25	23
F1 22 (2022)	54.7	49.6	37	28.2
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	23.2	19.3	16.5	16.3
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	21	17.7	15	13.2
Total War Pharaoh (2023)	85.1	51.9

排放 - 负载时声音大、温度高

噪音排放

搭载高通 SoC 的全新 Surface Pro 11 继续配备了风扇。在闲置和执行简单的日常任务时，风扇一般处于关闭状态，只有我们测得的 25 dB(A) 的静音噪音。在负载情况下，这取决于 GPU 或 CPU 的负载情况。在本机应用程序中，在纯 GPU 负载情况下，设备的噪音也保持在 25 分贝（A），但一旦对处理器施加压力，噪音就会迅速变大。在纯 CPU 负载情况下，我们测得的噪音为 39 分贝（A），游戏时也是如此。在综合 CPU/GPU 负载的压力测试中，噪音甚至高达 44.8 dB(A)。在其他两个配置文件中，该设备的噪音仍然稍低（更佳性能：最大 2 分贝（A），推荐性能：最大 2 分贝（A））。 40.2 dB(A)，推荐值：8 dB(A)）： 37.8 dB(A)）。我们的评测设备没有显示任何其他电子噪音。

总之，这使得新的 ARM 机型的声音甚至比英特尔版本的 Surface Pro 9当然，与被动散热的当然，与被动散热的 ARM 版 Surface Pro 9 相比也处于劣势。.

Noise Level

Idle		23.6 / 23.6 / 25.2 dB(A)
Load		39 / 44.8 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.6 dB(A)

	Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB	Minisforum V3 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM	Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 165U	Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU	Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV
Noise		-7%	-12%	2%	2%	2%	1%
off / environment *	23.6	25.4 -8%	21.42 9%	23.9 -1%	23.2 2%	24.1 -2%	24.3 -3%
Idle Minimum *	23.6	26.7 -13%	29.07 -23%	23.9 -1%	23.6 -0%	24.1 -2%	24.3 -3%
Idle Average *	23.6	31.6 -34%	29.07 -23%	23.9 -1%	23.6 -0%	24.1 -2%	24.3 -3%
Idle Maximum *	25.2	32.5 -29%	29.07 -15%	23.9 5%	25 1%	26.4 -5%	24.3 4%
Load Average *	39	32.7 16%	44.54 -14%	36.4 7%	34.8 11%	35.2 10%	37.9 3%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	39
Load Maximum *	44.8	34 24%	47.08 -5%	44.7 -0%	46.2 -3%	39.2 12%	41.8 7%
Witcher 3 ultra *		33.2	45.1	44.7	37.7	38.5	39.6

* ... smaller is better

温度

在执行简单任务时，新款 Surface Pro 11 仍然非常凉爽，只有在负载较大时才会出现问题。我们在金属后盖上部测得的温度为 45-46 °C，这让人很不舒服。问题在于，如果你改变设备的角度、将其放置在其他地方或将键盘从二合一设备上取下，你通常会在那里触碰到二合一设备。这已经是英特尔旧机型（Surface Pro 9）的一个问题了。

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


39.8 °C	42.7 °C	43.1 °C
40.1 °C	41.3 °C	41.3 °C
41.5 °C	40.8 °C	40.3 °C

Maximum: 43.1 °C
Average: 41.2 °C


45 °C	46.3 °C	45.4 °C
42.4 °C	44.3 °C	45.6 °C
41.2 °C	43 °C	43.3 °C

Maximum: 46.3 °C
Average: 44.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 38.7 °C | Room Temperature 21.1 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


25.9 °C	26.1 °C	26.1 °C
26.2 °C	26.6 °C	26.2 °C
27.5 °C	27.3 °C	27.1 °C

Maximum: 27.5 °C
Average: 26.6 °C


25.9 °C	26.5 °C	26.2 °C
26.6 °C	26.4 °C	26.4 °C
26.5 °C	26.8 °C	26.5 °C

Maximum: 26.8 °C
Average: 26.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 25.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


39.8 °C	42 °C	42.3 °C
40.2 °C	41.1 °C	41.1 °C
40 °C	40.3 °C	41.1 °C

Maximum: 42.3 °C
Average: 40.9 °C


44.5 °C	45.3 °C	45.6 °C
41.9 °C	43 °C	45 °C
40.7 °C	42 °C	42.7 °C

Maximum: 45.6 °C
Average: 43.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 37.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the class Tablet.

	Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M	Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU	Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690
Heat		-24%	-12%	8%	-8%	9%	4%	11%
Maximum Upper Side *	43.1	50.5 -17%	45.6 -6%	35.4 18%	40 7%	38.6 10%	44.6 -3%	40.8 5%
Maximum Bottom *	46.3	54.8 -18%	44.2 5%	37.8 18%	43 7%	39.2 15%	45.9 1%	43.4 6%
Idle Upper Side *	27.5	34.9 -27%	33.8 -23%	27.2 1%	32 -16%	25.2 8%	24.8 10%	23.2 16%
Idle Bottom *	26.8	36.3 -35%	32.8 -22%	28.2 -5%	35.2 -31%	25.7 4%	25.3 6%	22.6 16%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

微软继续为这款二合一设备配备了几个 2 瓦扬声器，虽然与旧款 Surface Pro 9 相比，音质没有太大变化，但总体而言，音效还是不错的。四扬声器 Galaxy Book4 Pro 360的表现也不尽如人意，而 Minisforum V3明显落后。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Minisforum V3 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理 - 改进运行时间

耗电量

在我们的空闲能耗测量中，配备骁龙 X Elite 的 Surface Pro 非常经济，尤其是考虑到高分辨率 OLED 面板。当然，深色壁纸也有帮助，但在 580 cd/m² 的亮度下，近 5 瓦的耗电量还是非常低的。在玩游戏时，我们测得的功耗约为 35 瓦，而在压力测试中，我们测得的最大功耗为 41 瓦，不过很快就降到了 38 瓦左右。39 瓦的 PSU 勉勉强强够用，但也没有太多储备。上一代产品的 60 瓦 PSU 会是更好的选择。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.25 / 0.36 Watt
Idle	2.8 / 3.9 / 4.9 Watt
Load	34.3 / 41.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB, OLED, 2880x1920, 13"	Minisforum V3 R7 8840U, Radeon 780M, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0, IPS, 2560x1600, 14"	Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.4"	Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core, , IPS, 2560x1600, 14"	Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"	Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV, IPS, 2880x1920, 13"	Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690, , IPS, 2880x1920, 13"	Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	Average of class Tablet
Power Consumption		-203%	-346%	-65%	-86%	-41%	-94%	-21%	-38%	37%
Idle Minimum *	2.8	10.1 -261%	16.63 -494%	3.2 -14%	4.2 -50%	3 -7%	5.1 -82%	2.8 -0%	3.57 ?(1.4 - 6.4, n=11) -28%	1.851 ?(0.63 - 6.5, n=66, last 2 years) 34%
Idle Average *	3.9	16.9 -333%	20.68 -430%	6.4 -64%	7.1 -82%	6.3 -62%	9.8 -151%	6.8 -74%	6.74 ?(3.9 - 9.7, n=11) -73%	3.82 ?(1 - 9.2, n=66, last 2 years) 2%
Idle Maximum *	4.9	20.6 -320%	29.88 -510%	10.8 -120%	12.9 -163%	6.5 -33%	11.3 -131%	8.1 -65%	7.67 ?(4.9 - 10.7, n=11) -57%	4.38 ?(1.3 - 15.3, n=66, last 2 years) 11%
Load Average *	34.3	51.7 -51%	75.5 -120%	54.6 -59%	58.9 -72%	49.3 -44%	47.5 -38%	23.8 31%	30.3 ?(24.2 - 40.6, n=9) 12%	9.53 ?(2.5 - 44.9, n=66, last 2 years) 72%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	35.8
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	36
Load Maximum *	41.2	61.2 -49%	113.3 -175%	70.2 -70%	66.7 -62%	65.5 -59%	68.5 -66%	40.2 2%	59.4 ?(40.7 - 69.3, n=11) -44%	13.3 ?(3.9 - 54.8, n=66, last 2 years) 68%
Witcher 3 ultra *		55.4	92.6	35.5	49.5	45.9	36

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk 2077 / stress test

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø38.8 (36.2-41.2)

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.33 (3.08-5.2)

Power consumption with an external monitor

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø17.3 (16.1-21.1)

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø4.68 (4.25-8.14)

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+; Cinebench 2024 Single Power (external Monitor): Ø18.2 (15-26.9)

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+; Cinebench 2024 Multi Power (external Monitor): Ø39.6 (32.7-41.1)

电池寿命

微软将电池容量从 47.7 Wh 提高到了 53 Wh，总体而言，电池运行时间（尽管 OLED 屏幕很亮）有所改善，尤其是与英特尔版本相比。在 150 cd/m²（相当于评测设备最大 SDR 亮度的 58%）和 60 Hz 下进行的 Wi-Fi 测试中，我们的续航时间达到了 11 小时（120 Hz 时为 10 小时），比 ARM 机型多出约 1 小时，比旧款英特尔机型多出 3.5 小时。在 60 Hz 和最大 SDR 亮度下进行 Wi-Fi 测试时，我们测得的时间略高于 6 小时，120 Hz 时略高于 5.5 小时。高亮度在这里非常明显。在 150 cd/m² 下进行的视频测试持续了近 16 个小时，而在最大亮度下播放 HDR 视频则持续了 6 小时 45 分钟。在负载情况下，大约 1 小时 45 分钟即可耗尽电池。在设备开启的情况下，完整的充电过程需要 142 分钟；85 分钟后，电池容量可恢复到 80%。

总之，与 Surface Pro 9 的旧款英特尔机型相比，骁龙 X Elite 允许更长的运行时间，而与直接竞争对手相比，其得分也相当不错。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		11h 05min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		6h 08min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		15h 53min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 44min

	Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 53 Wh	Minisforum V3 R7 8840U, Radeon 780M, 50.82 Wh	Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 75 Wh	Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core, 60 Wh	Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 75 Wh	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core, 76 Wh	Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 47.7 Wh	Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690, 47.7 Wh	Average of class Tablet
Battery Runtime		-17%	-11%	31%	-11%	-6%	-31%	-9%	60%
H.264	953		685 -28%			881 -8%	562 -41%		936 ?(463 - 1952, n=51, last 2 years) -2%
WiFi v1.3	665	352 -47%	712 7%	815 23%	600 -10%	531 -20%	451 -32%	603 -9%	816 ?(319 - 1764, n=78, last 2 years) 23%
Load	104	119 14%		143 38%	93 -11%	114 10%	82 -21%		270 ?(89 - 722, n=55, last 2 years) 160%
Witcher 3 ultra			90

Pros

+ 明亮、色彩准确（P3 和 sRGB）的 OLED 面板

+ 优质外壳

+ 良好的系统性能

+ 出色的摄像头

+ 电池续航时间长

+ USB 4 和 Wi-Fi 7

+ 可交换固态硬盘（M.2 2230）

+ 可选键盘盖，集成手写笔

Cons

- 负载/玩游戏时外壳温度过高

- OLED 在明亮区域有轻微的光栅效应

- PWM 闪烁

- 无 3.5 毫米音频接口

- 无 SD 读卡器

结论：配备骁龙处理器和 OLED 显示屏的 Surface Pro 是一款出色的二合一产品

评测：微软 Surface Pro OLED Copilot+。评测设备由微软提供：

在我们的评测中，配备骁龙 X Elite 处理器的全新 Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ 总体上给人留下了不错的印象。从速度上看，它与之前的英特尔型号没有明显区别，而且明显优于旧的 ARM 版本（不过它是被动散热的）。全新的第 11 代 Surface Pro 可以像 "普通 "的 Windows 设备一样使用，没有任何限制--只要你使用兼容的应用程序，并且不太在意游戏性能。不过，由于英特尔版本已经停产，微软在这个问题上并没有给用户任何选择的余地。

新的高通处理器提供了足够的性能，Adreno GPU 在处理日常任务时也没有任何问题。但是，骁龙芯片需要主动散热，因此，二合一手机的声音会变大，尤其是在 CPU 负载较高的情况下。此外，与旧款英特尔机型类似，在负载较高的情况下，表面温度过高也是一个问题，因为皮肤接触会让人不舒服。

全新 Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ 是一款不错的二合一设备，前提是你不需要任何特殊的应用程序或优先考虑游戏性能。电池续航时间得益于 ARM 芯片，除了轻微的光栅效应外，新的 OLED 面板也给人留下了深刻印象。

新的 OLED 面板非常明亮，除了 120 Hz 的频率外，它还提供了高分辨率和良好的图像质量。只有在观看明亮的内容时，才会出现轻微的光栅效应。尽管如此，3:2 显示屏并不适合媒体消费，而且 PWM 闪烁可能会在执行工作任务时产生负面影响。更便宜的 IPS 变体（目前也在评测中）在这方面可以做得更好，尤其是骁龙 X Plus 的速度并不慢。另外一个问题是价格，因为如果考虑到键盘和手写笔需要单独购买，2000 多美元的价格就相当昂贵了。

价格和供应情况

我们的 Surface Pro 评测设备在百思买（Best Buy）有售，价格为 1699 美元。配备 16GB 内存和 512GB 固态硬盘的 OLED 机型在百思买的售价也是 1499 美元。

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ - 08/10/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

91 / 98 → 92%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

64 / 69 → 92%

Weight

77 / 40-88 → 77%

Battery

89%

Display

86%

Games Performance

45 / 65 → 68%

Application Performance

79 / 92 → 86%

Temperature

83%

Noise

87%

Audio

85 / 91 → 93%

Camera

70 / 90 → 78%

Average

69%

83%

Tablet - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
50%

Packaging
100%

Power Use
89.9%

Repairability
50%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 52%

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andrew Dickson - Translator - 113 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 459232 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 微软 Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ 评测--搭载骁龙 X Elite 的高端二合一设备

Andreas Osthoff, 2024-07- 1 (Update: 2024-07- 1)

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core in comparison
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 (min) Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	28.1
...
HP ZBook Power 16 G11 A R7 8845HS, NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU	889
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	890
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	893
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	893
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	895
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	897
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	902
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	5372

3DMark 11 in comparison
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
Intel NUC Pro Chassis_i7_1265U i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6839
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6844
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	6846
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS	6846
HP EliteBook 865 G9 R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	6852
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 7i 14IAU7 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6853
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 360 16, i5-1340P i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	6855
...
(max) R7 9800X3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	77609

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - Surface Pro 采用熟悉的金属外壳

尺寸比较

功能 - 配备 USB 4 的 ARM Surface

交流

网络摄像头

维护

保修

输入设备 - 全新 Surface Pro 柔性键盘

显示屏 - 120 Hz OLED

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - 配备双核涡轮增压技术的 Snapdragon X Elite

测试条件

处理器 - Snapdragon X1E-80-100

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

系统性能

DPC 延迟

大容量存储器

Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom Liberty FPS diagram

排放 - 负载时声音大、温度高

噪音排放

温度

发言人

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ audio analysis

Minisforum V3 audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 audio analysis

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U audio analysis

能源管理 - 改进运行时间

耗电量

Power consumption Cyberpunk 2077 / stress test

Power consumption with an external monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论：配备骁龙处理器和 OLED 显示屏的 Surface Pro 是一款出色的二合一产品

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison