宏碁 Swift Go 14 (2023) 评测：配备 2.9k OLED 面板、售价 800 美元的 14 英寸笔记本电脑
宏碁 Swift Go 14 是一款小巧的 14 英寸笔记本电脑，采用光滑的铝制外壳，价格不贵，目前仅不到 800 美元。它采用 Raptor Lake 处理器，足以满足办公需求。竞争对手包括华硕 ZenBook 14 UM3402Y, 惠普 ProBook 445 G10, Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 入门版和联想 Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8.
如果您需要更大的屏幕，那么不妨看看Swift Go 16 。Go 14 的姊妹机型采用分辨率更高的 16 英寸 OLED 面板。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85.6 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.3 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 85.3 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y R7 7730U, Vega 8 | 1.4 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 89 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M | 1.5 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.50" | 2560x1600 | |
| 84.6 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | HP ProBook 445 G10 R5 7530U, Vega 7 | 1.3 kg | 20 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 91.1 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2020 | Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1, M1 7-Core GPU | 1.3 kg | 16.1 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 |
外壳和连接性 - Swift 配备两个 Thunderbolt 4 端口
笔记本电脑的外壳棱角分明，看不出任何做工瑕疵。宏碁选用了银色（纯银）铝材，表面光滑哑光。由于铰链较硬、重量较轻，单手打开笔记本电脑有点困难。拆开机壳底部后，就可以看到电池（旋入式，非粘合式）以及笔记本电脑的其他内部结构。
机身配备了两个 USB-A 端口（USB 3.2 Gen 1）和两个 USB-C 端口（Thunderbolt 4/USB 4、Power Delivery、DisplayPort）。笔记本电脑总共提供多达三个视频输出接口（1x HDMI、2x DP）。安装的 SD 读卡器（MicroSD）读取速度非常慢。 QHD 网络摄像头（370 万像素，最大 2,560 x 1,440 像素）效果相当不错。我们不太明白为什么它没有盖子。
在最佳条件下（附近没有 WiFi 设备，笔记本电脑和服务器电脑之间的距离很短），它的 WiFi 数据传输率非常高。笔记本电脑使用的是 WiFi 6E 芯片（英特尔 AX211）。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=35, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=31, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
输入设备 - 配备背光键盘的 Acer 笔记本电脑
chiclet 键盘的照明按键（2 种亮度设置）具有短抬起和清晰按压点的特点。按键的阻力可能会更好一些。键入时，键盘会有轻微的翘曲，但这并不特别令人讨厌。总而言之，宏碁提供了一款适合日常使用的键盘--即便如此，它肯定算不上市场上最好的输入设备之一。支持多点触控的点击板（约 10.5 x 6.5 厘米）取代了鼠标。它的特点是抬起距离短，压力点清晰。
显示屏 - OLED，覆盖 DCI-P3
作为 OLED 设备的典型代表，宏碁笔记本电脑的 14 英寸屏幕（2880 x 1800 像素）采用 16:10 宽高比，具有出色的黑度和快速的反应速度。像素密度为 242 ppi，肉眼无法看到单个像素。该显示屏通过了 Vesa 认证（DisplayHDR 500 True Black）。
该面板的缺点包括表面反光、亮度低，以及在亮度≤100%时会出现一些闪烁（357 Hz）。后者与面板调节亮度的方式有关。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 275.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 6950:1 (Black: 0.04 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.01 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 4.14
ΔE Greyscale 3.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.194
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 Samsung ATNA40YK11-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y Samsung ATNA40YK07-1, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 LEN145WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.5" | HP ProBook 445 G10 AUO2FA6, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | -17% | -21% | -4% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 99.9 0% | 71.8 -28% | 68.4 -32% | 98.6 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 99.2 -1% | 95.2 -5% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 95.4 | 98.3 3% | 73.1 -23% | 70.6 -26% | 85.9 -10% |
| Response Times | 19% | -1715% | -1888% | 10057% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.85 ? | 1.19 ? 36% | 43.2 ? -2235% | 53.4 ? -2786% | 31 ? -1576% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 2 ? | 1.62 ? 19% | 25.9 ? -1195% | 21.8 ? -990% | 26.1 ? -1205% |
| PWM Frequency | 357 ? | 362.3 ? 1% | 118000 ? 32953% | ||
| Screen | 34% | -80% | -49% | -71% | |
| Brightness middle | 278 | 336.6 21% | 386 39% | 501 80% | 417 50% |
| Brightness | 279 | 339 22% | 366 31% | 464 66% | 395 42% |
| Brightness Distribution | 96 | 98 2% | 91 -5% | 87 -9% | 91 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.04 | 0.26 -550% | 0.26 -550% | 0.39 -875% | |
| Contrast | 6950 | 1485 -79% | 1927 -72% | 1069 -85% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.01 | 0.84 72% | 3.8 -26% | 2.64 12% | 1.12 63% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.43 | 3.1 30% | 9.1 -105% | 5.06 -14% | 2.71 39% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.14 | 1.2 71% | 1.57 62% | 0.77 81% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 1.4 56% | 6.2 -94% | 3.8 -19% | 1.7 47% |
| Gamma | 2.194 100% | 2.24 98% | 2.09 105% | 2.103 105% | 2207 0% |
| CCT | 6126 106% | 6439 101% | 6618 98% | 6562 99% | 6870 95% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 18% /
22% | -604% /
-300% | -653% /
-306% | 3327% /
1968% |
* ... smaller is better
给出了色彩准确度：sRGB 和 DCI-P3 色彩空间完全覆盖，Adobe RGB 空间几乎完全覆盖。其色彩描绘有一定的改进空间：偏差为 3.06，几乎没有达到目标（DeltaE < 3）。校准并不会带来任何改善，但却能使灰阶更加平衡。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.85 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 357 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 357 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 357 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
视角稳定的面板从任何角度都清晰可辨。在室外，由于显示屏表面反光，且最大亮度较低，因此很难阅读。
性能 - 猛禽湖带来强劲动力
宏碁的 Swift Go 14 是一款便携式 14 英寸笔记本电脑，采用 OLED 屏幕和铝制外壳。 Raptor Lake（U 或 H）可为办公和上网以及简单的游戏提供足够的动力。在撰写本文时，本测试设备是该系列中最便宜的设备，售价约 800 美元。
测试条件
您可以使用 Fn + F 组合键或通过预装的快速访问应用程序在三个制造商特定的性能配置文件（见表）之间切换。我们使用的是 "性能模式"（基准测试）和 "静音模式"（电池测试）。
在我们进行的所有测试中，性能模式和普通模式的结果几乎完全相同。因此，普通模式非常适合日常使用，尤其是风扇的使用更加隐蔽。性能更强的 Raptor Lake H Swift 可能会有所不同。
| 性能模式 | 正常模式 | 静音模式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 功率限制 1 (HWInfo) | 28 瓦 | 28 瓦 | 15 瓦 |
| 功率限制 2 (HWInfo) | 55 瓦 | 55 瓦 | 55 瓦 |
处理器
酷睿 i5-1335U酷睿 i5-1335U的 10 个 CPU 内核（2P、8E）的最高时钟频率分别为 4.6 GHz（P）和 3.4 GHz（E）。永久多线程负载（CB15 循环）导致时钟频率从第一次运行到第二次运行时略有下降。之后，它们保持不变。
与之前 CPU 的平均水平相比，该处理器的基准测试结果低于平均水平（连接电源时）。在使用电池时，其单核性能（139 分；CB15）的下降幅度大于多线程性能（1087 分；CB15）。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Average of class Office | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1335U | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Average of class Office (763 - 24250, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1335U (5661 - 7809, n=11) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Average of class Office (4113 - 102228, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1335U (29483 - 43636, n=11) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Average of class Office (287 - 4551, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1335U (1515 - 2278, n=11) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1335U (53839 - 60992, n=11) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Average of class Office (404 - 14288, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1335U (3873 - 5008, n=11) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Average of class Office (2075 - 54365, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1335U (14376 - 20553, n=11) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Average of class Office (7254 - 155900, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1335U (31154 - 65997, n=11) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Average of class Office (78 - 1018, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1335U (378 - 676, n=11) | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Average of class Office (432 - 12755, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1335U (2878 - 4214, n=11) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1335U (13584 - 41123, n=11) | |
| Average of class Office (4814 - 54971, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
系统性能
该系统运行流畅，既能满足办公和互联网应用的需要，也能应付零星的休闲游戏。内存的数据传输速率符合 LPDDR5-4800 内存的正常水平。将来不可能扩展内存：内存是永久焊接的，没有内存库。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Average of class Office (2463 - 7344, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (5068 - 5600, n=11) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (9828 - 11912, n=11) | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
| Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (6196 - 7261, n=11) | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Average of class Office (2049 - 9773, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (5361 - 6164, n=11) | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1339 - 1599, n=11) | |
| Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1337 - 1638, n=11) | |
| Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1315 - 1620, n=11) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Average of class Office (340 - 1982, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1023 - 1868, n=11) | |
| Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5328 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
| Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1335U (22417 - 60884, n=11) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average of class Office (7325 - 127282, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1335U (23104 - 61555, n=11) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
| Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1335U (22936 - 72584, n=11) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Average of class Office (6.9 - 185.2, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1335U (78.6 - 112.8, n=11) | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
标准延迟监控测试（网上冲浪、4K 视频播放、Prime95 高负载）未发现任何异常。该系统似乎适合实时视频和音频编辑。未来的软件更新可能会带来改进，甚至恶化。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
笔记本电脑的 PCIe 4 固态硬盘（M.2-2280）来自西部数据，存储容量为 512 GB，传输速率良好。正面：没有热引起的节流现象。该设备有一个用于第二个固态硬盘的插槽。
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Average WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014 | |
| Average of class Office | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
英特尔的 iGPU 可以一直以全功率（1,250 MHz）工作--如测试所示。 Witcher 3测试表明。该硬件能满足许多中型游戏的要求，但 Swift 并不是一款游戏笔记本电脑。3D Mark 结果和帧速率都高于该 iGPU 的平均水平。
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 -1! | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 6010 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 19938 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4163 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1447 points | |
Help | ||
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 -1! | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y -2! | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
| Average of class Office (12 - 106.3, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (21.8 - 56.9, n=103) | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1280x720 Lite Quality | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Average of class Office (12.1 - 103.1, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (8.32 - 45.6, n=104) | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Average of class Office (13.4 - 121.2, n=95, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (7.8 - 66.1, n=110) | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 111.5 | 98.7 | 21.5 | 9.23 | 6.04 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 79.8 | 52.3 | 28.1 | 13.1 | 9.85 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 103.6 | 80.2 | 62.6 | 56.5 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 39.4 | 22 | 15.1 | 11.3 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 33.5 | 23.6 | 21.4 | ||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 81.6 | 34.5 | 27.2 | 22.2 | 16.5 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 15.7 | 12.2 | 10.4 | 9.71 | 6.06 |
| Dead Island 2 (2023) | 30.5 | 25.9 | 19 | 14.3 | 9.91 |
| Diablo 4 (2023) | 34 | 28.1 | 24 | 20.1 | 13.6 |
| Atlas Fallen (2023) | 17.6 | 16.9 | 15.2 | 12.5 | 8.51 |
| Armored Core 6 (2023) | 27.8 | 23 | 20.2 | 15.5 | 11.2 |
| Lies of P (2023) | 17.8 | 15.5 | 13.2 | 11.8 | 8.05 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 13.4 | 11.3 | 9.16 | 8.25 | 5.45 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 15.5 | 12.2 | 10.4 | 9.72 | 6.05 |
| EA Sports FC 24 (2023) | 34.6 | ||||
| Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023) | 17 | 16 | |||
| Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 59.4 | 41.3 | 28 | 22.4 | 16.8 |
噪音和功率 - Acer 笔记本电脑产生的噪音很小
噪音排放
这款笔记本电脑是同类产品中最安静的。其安装的冷却装置在日常使用（办公、上网）中通常是静音的，两个风扇在中等负载下运行也很安静。在满载情况下，声音会变大：我们测得的声压级为 43.2 dB(A)。使用 "静音模式 "可进一步降低本已很低的噪音水平，但会牺牲一些计算能力。
负面影响风扇会发出细微的啸叫声，随着转速的增加，噪音会越来越大。笔记本电脑内部也会发出嘎嘎的噪音（只有在绝对安静的环境下才会明显感觉到）。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 24.9 / 24.9 / 24.9 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 31.9 / 43.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.9 dB(A) | ||
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014 | Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y Vega 8, R7 7730U, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 Radeon 680M, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | HP ProBook 445 G10 Vega 7, R5 7530U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G | Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -3% | 2% | 4% | ||
| off / environment * | 24.9 | 22.6 9% | 24.2 3% | 24 4% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 24.9 | 22.6 9% | 24.2 3% | 24 4% | |
| Idle Average * | 24.9 | 22.6 9% | 24.2 3% | 25 -0% | |
| Idle Maximum * | 24.9 | 22.6 9% | 24.2 3% | 28 -12% | |
| Load Average * | 31.9 | 40.7 -28% | 36.2 -13% | 33 -3% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.2 | 46.6 -8% | 42.7 1% | 36 17% | |
| Load Maximum * | 43.2 | 52.5 -22% | 36.2 16% | 36 17% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在满负荷（压力测试）情况下，笔记本电脑的温度并不高。在日常使用（办公、上网）中，这些数值始终保持在绿色区域。
压力测试（连续使用 Prime95 和 Furmark）模拟了一种极端情况，以分析系统在满负荷情况下的稳定性。测试开始后，CPU 时钟频率明显下降（P：1.6 至 1.8 GHz，E：1.4 至 1.5 GHz）。显卡的运行频率约为 1,000MHz。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.1 °C / 91.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-5.5 °C / -9.9 F).
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y AMD Ryzen 7 7730U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M | HP ProBook 445 G10 AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1, Apple M1 7-Core GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 0% | 3% | -6% | 1% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 44.8 | 39.4 12% | 39.2 12% | 43 4% | 44 2% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 34.8 | 43.2 -24% | 49.8 -43% | 51 -47% | 44 -26% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 30.7 | 28.6 7% | 24.2 21% | 27 12% | 27 12% |
| Idle Bottom * | 32.5 | 30.6 6% | 25.1 23% | 30 8% | 27 17% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
立体声扬声器能产生不错的音效，但几乎没有低音。
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
耗电量
我们注意到宏碁笔记本电脑的耗电量没有异常。就所安装的硬件而言，其值处于正常水平。压力测试和 Witcher 3测试均在恒定功耗的情况下进行。随机提供的 USB-C 电源（65 瓦）功率足够大。
| Off / Standby | 0.45 / 0.45 Watt |
| Idle | 6.79 / 6.83 / 10.5 Watt |
| Load |
45.9 / 69.8 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
在我们的实际 WLAN 测试中，Swift 的运行时间达到了 7:33 小时（使用脚本访问网站时的负载映射）--这是一个合理的值。通过激活全系统的黑暗模式，运行时间可延长 40 分钟，达到 8:14 小时。其竞争对手的表现都更好，因为它们配备了更节能的处理器和/或更大容量的电池。
Pros
Cons
评价--成功的办公室全能选手，缺点也不少
低重量（约 1.3 千克）、良好的运行时间、Power Delivery 和坚固的金属外壳都使 Swift Go 成为一个很好的移动伴侣。两个 USB-C 端口（TB4）使该笔记本电脑可以轻松集成到现有的工作场所设置中。
时尚的外观、充足的动力、实惠的价格--宏碁 Swift Go 14 可以在中小学、大学和办公室找到自己的位置。
其色彩丰富（DCI-P3）、对比度高（2,880 x 1,800 像素，90 Hz）的 16:10 长宽比 OLED 面板稍稍削弱了其便携性：其反光表面和较低的最大亮度使这款笔记本电脑只适合在室内使用。正面：屏幕上方有一个 QHD 网络摄像头（370 万像素）。
A酷睿 i5-1335U、16 GB 内存（双通道）和 PCIe 4 固态硬盘（512 GB），可满足办公和上网需求。它的废气排放无需担心：笔记本电脑通常运行安静，几乎不会发热。
您可以选择华硕 ZenBook 14 UM340.它的 CPU 性能更好，运行时间更长。不过，它没有任何 USB 4 或 Thunderbolt 4 端口。
价格和供应情况
宏碁 Swift Go 14 SFG14-71-51JU 目前在亚马逊上的售价为 799.99 美元。
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-71
- 11/01/2023 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
