联想 Tab M10 5G 评测--具备移动连接和超长电池续航能力的平板电脑

Name: Lenovo Tab M10 5G
Brand: Lenovo

耐力大师

联想 Tab M10 5G 可以提供更强的性能，尤其是与竞争对手相比。不过，如果你能接受中档电源，并喜欢偶尔充电，此外还能享受 90 Hz 无 PWM 显示屏，那么这款平板电脑可能就是你的最佳选择。在本次测试中，我们将进一步了解这款平板电脑的优缺点。

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 11/16/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android ARM Tablet

联想提供各种平板电脑，主要集中在中端市场。虽然 Tab P11 5G这款 10.6 英寸平板电脑目前的售价不到 200 美元，极具竞争力。

在我们的评测中，我们将仔细研究这款中端平板电脑是否真的值得考虑，因为与 Tab M10 相比，它的 SoC 略显老旧，而且还采取了一些节约成本的小措施。平板电脑 P11 5G.它强大的电池容量能否弥补这些不足？

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo Tab M10 5G (Tab M Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 8 x 1.7 - 2.2 GHz, Kryo 660 Gold (2x Cortex-A78) / Silver (6x Cortex-A55)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 619

Memory

6 GB

Display

10.60 inch 15:9, 2000 x 1200 pixel 220 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, IPS, glossy: yes, 90 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB

, 100 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio port, Card Reader: microSDXC (up to 1TB) , Brightness Sensor, Sensors: proximity sensor, acceleration sensor, position sensor, hall sensor

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, GSM (850, 900, 1700, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66), 5G (Band n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n28, n38, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78), LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 252.7 x 160.3

Battery

7700 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 20 Watt charging

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix AF, LED flash
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: stereo speakers, charger, USB cable, SIM needle, 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

490 g

Price

399 Euro

Links

Lenovo homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
82.6 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2023	Lenovo Tab M10 5G SD 695 5G, Adreno 619	490 g	8.3 mm	10.60"	2000x1200
80 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2023	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 T610, Mali-G52 MP2	460 g	8.5 mm	10.10"	1920x1200
85.2 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2023	Lenovo Tab P11 5G SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619	520 g	7.5 mm	11.00"	2000x1200
88.8 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2023	Xiaomi Pad 6 SD 870, Adreno 650	490 g	6.51 mm	11.00"	2880x1800
89.3 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2023	OnePlus Pad Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10	552 g	6.5 mm	11.61"	2800x2000

外壳 - 塑料后端

平板电脑的背面由塑料制成，颜色为深蓝色或深灰色，顶部的颜色略有反差。尽管背面采用了磨砂外观，但如果不盖上盖子，指纹很快就会积聚在背面。据生产商称，该平板电脑具有基本的防尘和防水溅功能，但不能浸入水中。

Tab M10 5G 重 1.08 磅，考虑到它的尺寸，这个重量还算适中。屏幕的边框设计旨在让您舒适地握住平板电脑，而不会无意中触碰到触摸屏，同时又保持了现代的外观。

它的制造质量很好；压力很少传到屏幕上，外壳只能稍微弯曲，材料过渡非常平滑，几乎感觉不到。

尺寸比较

连接性 - 5G，但无 eSIM

联想平板电脑配备了 6GB 内存和 128GB UFS 2.2 闪存，这在这个价位的平板电脑中很常见。不过，小米 Pad 6 和联想平板电脑的配置却相差甚远。小米平板 6的大容量存储速度更快。

与平板电脑 P11 5G不同的是，这款平板电脑采用的是 USB 2.0 端口，因此线缆数据传输速度较慢，而且无法通过线缆将屏幕内容镜像到外部显示器上。

虽然该平板电脑有一个 3.5 毫米音频接口，但没有 NFC 模块，因此无法使用 Google Pay 等支付服务。

由于不支持 eSIM 卡，因此需要使用 nano SIM 卡才能使用蜂窝网络功能。

microSD 读卡器

除 SIM 卡插槽外，还可使用 microSD 卡扩展内存。读卡器的表现相当出色，在我们的复制测试中超过了同类设备。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo Tab M10 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	30.2 MB/s
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)	26.6 MB/s -12%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	21.3 MB/s -29%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Lenovo Tab M10 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø34.7 (24.5-41)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34 (17.4-45.3)

Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø28.9 (21.1-37.7)

Lenovo Tab M10 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø74 (11.4-92.8)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø71.3 (43.6-81.3)

Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø75.6 (14.2-95)

纯软件Android

联想 Tab M10 5G 在Android 13 上运行，联想只做了极少的修改。这使它对有经验的Android 用户友好。

联想避免安装用于广告目的的第三方软件，而是选择了用于笔输入的笔记和绘图应用程序、放松应用程序、联想服务应用程序以及用于设备连接的联想Freestyle。

截至测试期间，安全补丁的日期为 2023 年 7 月。联想承诺更新至Android 14，并承诺提供 3.5 年的软件更新，可能会持续到 2026 年底。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WLAN 几乎无法工作

这款平板电脑通过 WiFi 5 进行连接，提供稳定且合适的数据传输速率，尤其是在使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器进行测试时。

不过，值得注意的是，许多同价位的平板电脑都能提供更快的网络连接选项，例如小米 Pad 6和 OnePlus Pad.

得益于其塑料外壳，内置的 5G 调制解调器可以在我们为期两周的测试期间建立相对不受干扰的稳定连接，支持多种 4G 和 5G 频率，以便在旅行时使用多功能移动互联网。

虽然该平板电脑具有电话功能，但建议在公共场合使用耳机，因为声音是通过扬声器输出的，可能会让其他人听到。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
OnePlus Pad	1696 (1635^min - 1722^max) MBit/s +451%
Xiaomi Pad 6	932 (727^min - 966^max) MBit/s +203%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G	608 (568^min - 629^max) MBit/s +97%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	319 (310^min - 325^max) MBit/s +4%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G	308 (264^min - 337^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
OnePlus Pad	1710 (1696^min - 1724^max) MBit/s +387%
Xiaomi Pad 6	880 (791^min - 925^max) MBit/s +151%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G	511 (344^min - 584^max) MBit/s +46%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	351 (333^min - 366^max) MBit/s 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G	351 (332^min - 363^max) MBit/s

Lenovo Tab M10 5G; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø308 (264-337)

Lenovo Tab M10 5G; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø351 (332-363)

平板电脑的全球导航卫星系统模块支持所有主要的全球网络，但不使用 SBAS 进行更精确的跟踪。在室内，位置确定是近似的，但走到室外就能快速准确地跟踪位置，精确度可达 10 英尺。

我们带着平板电脑骑车，并与 Garmin Venu 2 手表进行比较，看看它在实际环境中的表现如何。

联想平板电脑在定位方面表现出色，可以轻松完成弯道等高难度动作，有几次还只是稍微偏离了真实路径。因此，我们建议使用平板电脑进行导航和跟踪。

摄像头 - 平板电脑的平均水平

由于平板电脑的外形因素，只有少数用户会将其用于拍照，因此平板电脑的拍照质量往往会大打折扣。

联想 Tab M10 5G 的 1300 万像素主摄像头拍摄出的照片细节不够丰富。即使在光线充足的条件下，枫叶等细微结构也不够清晰，无法达到高端智能手机摄像头的质量。

在光线不足和高对比度等苛刻条件下，平板电脑的相机性能也不尽如人意：明亮区域显得太亮，暗部缺乏细节，整体清晰度一般。

视频录制最大限制为 1080p 和 30 fps，细节水平较低，偶尔会出现自动对焦失灵和明显的曝光调整。

前置摄像头为 800 万像素，自拍效果有些暗。虽然基本可用，但放大后可能会丢失一些细节。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Pflanze Hauptkamera Umgebung Hauptkamera Low Light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

我们把平板电脑带到了照片实验室，主摄像头在全棚照明和 1 勒克斯弱光条件下拍摄了测试图表的照片。

在最佳照明条件下，照片显得浑浊且缺乏对比度，而在 1 勒克斯条件下，照片中几乎无法辨认。

ColorChecker Lenovo Tab M10 5G: 7.22 ∆E min: 1.35 - max: 14.96 ∆E

附件和保修 - 手写笔需单独购买

联想 Tab M10 5G TB360ZU 随附充电器、数据线和 SIM 卡工具。联想还出售配套的保护盖和集成支架。

对触控笔感兴趣的用户可以单独购买联想 Tab Pen Plus。它具有 4,096 级压力和倾斜度，一个 USB-C 端口用于充电，并可通过蓝牙与平板电脑连接。

联想为美国境内的订单提供 12 个月的产品保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - 无指纹传感器

由于采用了 90 Hz 面板，触摸屏反应极为灵敏，即使在边角位置也能保持灵敏。机身顶部和左侧的硬件按键操作简单。

平板电脑没有指纹传感器，因此必须依靠前置摄像头进行二维面部识别。这种方法可以相对快速、可靠地工作。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 不带 PWM 的相当明亮的 IPS 屏幕

在我们的测试中，联想 Tab M10 5G 的 IPS 显示屏亮度高达 472 cd/m²，令人印象深刻，明显高于同价位的平板电脑。

10.6 英寸面板的分辨率为 2,000 x 1,200 像素，显示效果清晰。Widevine L1 认证支持高清流媒体内容。

不过，黑屏显示效果欠佳，对比度较弱，导致画面有些暗淡。幸运的是，白平衡可以在设置中进行调整，还可以使用夜光功能减少画面中的蓝色内容。


418 cd/m²	430 cd/m²	440 cd/m²
471 cd/m²	472 cd/m²	462 cd/m²
430 cd/m²	456 cd/m²	453 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 472 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 448 cd/m² Minimum: 4.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 472 cd/m²
Contrast: 749:1 (Black: 0.63 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.17 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.173

	Lenovo Tab M10 5G IPS, 2000x1200, 10.6"	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"	Lenovo Tab P11 5G IPS, 2000x1200, 11"	Xiaomi Pad 6 IPS LCD, 2880x1800, 11"	OnePlus Pad IPS, 2800x2000, 11.6"
Screen		-5%	3%	34%	34%
Brightness middle	472	343 -27%	358 -24%	541 15%	474 0%
Brightness	448	332 -26%	338 -25%	494 10%	447 0%
Brightness Distribution	89	94 6%	88 -1%	89 0%	89 0%
Black Level *	0.63	0.31 51%	0.47 25%	0.65 -3%	0.32 49%
Contrast	749	1106 48%	762 2%	832 11%	1481 98%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.17	5.9 -41%	3.94 6%	0.9 78%	3.16 24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.8	11.2 -27%	7.38 16%	1.8 80%	5.37 39%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.3	7.9 -25%	4.7 25%	1.4 78%	2.5 60%
Gamma	2.173 ^101%	2.184 ^101%	2.211 ^100%	2.26 ^97%	2.09 ^105%
CCT	8314 ^78%	9198 ^71%	7666 ^85%	6710 ^97%	7112 ^91%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在我们的测量中没有检测到 PWM，但缓慢的响应时间可能会使屏幕不适合要求苛刻的用户。

我们的分光光度计和 CalMAN 软件在测量中发现了明显的偏蓝现象。总体而言，除了明亮的蓝色色调和白色之外，色彩还原还算不错。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11 ms rise
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19 ms rise
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

最好避免阳光直射室外，因为闪亮的显示屏表面和一般的平均亮度可能会给观看图像带来困难。

另一方面，可视角度非常稳定，可以从侧面观看屏幕内容。

性能--功率相对有限的联想 Tab M10 5G

高通高通骁龙 695在我们的基准测试中，与同价位的设备相比，高通 Snapdragon 695 已经使用了两年，其性能相对一般，充其量只能处于中等水平。

在测试期间，日常使用中出现的卡顿现象极少，但在处理非常复杂的应用程序和多任务时，该设备可能会达到极限。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
OnePlus Pad	1279 Points +93%
Xiaomi Pad 6	1003 Points +52%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)	707 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (659 - 697, n=24)	676 Points +2%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G	661 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 5G	643 Points -3%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	346 Points -48%
Multi-Core
OnePlus Pad	3998 Points +107%
Xiaomi Pad 6	3328 Points +72%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)	2496 Points +29%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G	1936 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (1663 - 2038, n=24)	1904 Points -2%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G	1837 Points -5%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1267 Points -35%

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Xiaomi Pad 6	1299 Points +45%
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=68, last 2 years)	1093 Points +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (893 - 919, n=8)	906 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G	894 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=68, last 2 years)	3518 Points +69%
Xiaomi Pad 6	3357 Points +61%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G	2086 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (1993 - 2189, n=8)	2073 Points -1%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
OnePlus Pad	935522 Points +139%
Xiaomi Pad 6	581322 Points +49%
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=49, last 2 years)	464403 Points +19%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G	392823 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G	391372 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (344344 - 416086, n=18)	389461 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	199786 Points -49%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
OnePlus Pad	15951 Points +70%
Xiaomi Pad 6	13728 Points +46%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)	9812 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6897 - 11732, n=23)	9629 Points +3%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G	9374 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 5G	7498 Points -20%

CrossMark - Overall
OnePlus Pad	1114 Points +84%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)	772 Points +27%
Xiaomi Pad 6	754 Points +24%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G	606 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (521 - 606, n=18)	583 Points -4%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G	502 Points -17%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	356 Points -41%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
OnePlus Pad	7453 Points +98%
Xiaomi Pad 6	5289 Points +40%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)	4210 Points +12%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G	3766 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (3171 - 3848, n=19)	3648 Points -3%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G	3519 Points -7%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	2283 Points -39%
System
OnePlus Pad	10635 Points +33%
Xiaomi Pad 6	8463 Points +6%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G	8019 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6789 - 8231, n=19)	7725 Points -4%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)	7279 Points -9%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G	7119 Points -11%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	4777 Points -40%
Memory
OnePlus Pad	6873 Points +63%
Xiaomi Pad 6	6127 Points +45%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)	4874 Points +16%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G	4671 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (3167 - 4836, n=19)	4227 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G	4218 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	3412 Points -19%
Graphics
OnePlus Pad	22155 Points +402%
Xiaomi Pad 6	11263 Points +155%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)	9171 Points +108%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G	4415 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (3975 - 4426, n=19)	4340 Points -2%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G	3974 Points -10%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1497 Points -66%
Web
OnePlus Pad	1906 Points +41%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G	1347 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6	1336 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)	1269 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (1078 - 1434, n=19)	1253 Points -7%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G	1161 Points -14%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1114 Points -17%

AImark - Score v3.x
OnePlus Pad	27367 Points +5824%
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=51, last 2 years)	7152 Points +1448%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G	2942 Points +537%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (426 - 3080, n=7)	825 Points +79%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G	462 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	302 Points -35%
Xiaomi Pad 6	Points -100%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
OnePlus Pad	29879 Points +424%
Xiaomi Pad 6	16501 Points +189%
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)	11329 Points +99%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G	7776 Points +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (5442 - 9348, n=15)	6775 Points +19%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G	5707 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1662 Points -71%

Legend

Lenovo Tab M10 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 UNISOC T610, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Tab P11 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Xiaomi Pad 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

OnePlus Pad MediaTek Dimensity 9000, ARM Mali-G710 MP10,

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G

Average of class Tablet

GPU 基准测试表明，在原生屏幕分辨率下，这款平板电脑有足够的能力运行复杂的应用程序；只有在 1440p 或 4K 时才会出现问题。不过，值得注意的是，小米和 OnePlus 的竞争对手在这些情况下表现出了更强的性能。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	2310 Points +556%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1233 Points +250%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	352 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	331 Points -6%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	132 Points -62%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	2377 Points +558%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1246 Points +245%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	361 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	337 Points -7%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	135 Points -63%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	8497 Points +609%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4252 Points +255%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1198 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1115 Points -7%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	522 Points -56%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	7933 Points +554%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4293 Points +254%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1213 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1116 Points -8%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	524 Points -57%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	9689 Points +219%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7363 Points +142%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3042 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2948 Points -3%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1146 Points -62%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	12658 Points +328%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8593 Points +191%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2957 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2816 Points -5%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	979 Points -67%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	5321 Points +57%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4882 Points +44%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3528 Points +4%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3383 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2848 Points -16%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps +38%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	79 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	60 fps -24%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	60 fps -24%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	31 fps -61%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	246 fps +162%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	181 fps +93%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	94 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	91 fps -3%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	32 fps -66%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	60 fps +40%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps +37%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	43 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	40 fps -7%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	19 fps -56%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	177 fps +277%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	118 fps +151%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	47 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	45 fps -4%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	20 fps -57%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	51 fps +59%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	33 fps +3%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	32 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	29 fps -9%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	11 fps -66%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	128 fps +276%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps +138%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	34 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	33 fps -3%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	12 fps -65%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	32 fps +78%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	21 fps +17%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	18 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	17 fps -6%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6.4 fps -64%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	73 fps +284%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps +158%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	19 fps 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6.6 fps -65%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	26 fps +117%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	17 fps +42%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	11 fps -8%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	4.5 fps -62%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	37 fps +374%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20 fps +156%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.8 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	7.3 fps -6%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2.7 fps -65%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	36 fps +80%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps +10%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	18 fps -10%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7.4 fps -63%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	93 fps +343%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53 fps +152%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	21 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	20 fps -5%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7.8 fps -63%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	17 fps +386%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9.7 fps +177%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.5 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3.3 fps -6%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1.2 fps -66%

虽然基准测试表明上网冲浪时的性能尚可，这可能归功于较新的浏览器版本，但在实际使用中，复杂页面的加载需要一段时间。值得注意的是，滚动显示照片时会出现延迟。

Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | Speedometer 2.0 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)	148.115 Points +49%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years)	108.7 Points +10%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G (Chrome 118)	99.224 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	86.985 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (48.6 - 105.3, n=19)	71.2 Points -28%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G (Chrome 109)	67.456 Points -32%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	46.85 Points -53%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)	158 Points +61%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=68, last 2 years)	104.3 Points +6%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G (Chrome 118)	98 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	94 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (58 - 111, n=18)	74.3 Points -24%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G (Chrome 109)	63 Points -36%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	53 Points -46%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)	119 runs/min +66%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years)	115.5 runs/min +61%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G (Chrome 118)	71.7 runs/min
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	68.93 runs/min -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (38.7 - 80.1, n=16)	54 runs/min -25%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G (Chome 109)	41.5 runs/min -42%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chome 111)	34.43 runs/min -52%

Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)	50429 Points +74%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	30783 Points +6%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G (Chrome 118)	29009 Points
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)	28653 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (17849 - 31647, n=21)	24051 Points -17%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G (Chrome 109)	21566 Points -26%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	11952 Points -59%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years)	3789 ms * -179%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	3075.1 ms * -127%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G (Chrome 109)	1897.2 ms * -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (1298 - 2501, n=18)	1769 ms * -30%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	1532.1 ms * -13%
Lenovo Tab M10 5G (Chrome 118)	1356.1 ms *
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)	797.7 ms * +41%

* ... smaller is better

联想 Tab M10 5G 配备了相对较快的 UFS 2.2 闪存，不过我们的基准测试表明，内存控制器可能无法充分发挥其潜力。不过，内存的速度肯定比非 5G 版 Tab M10 的 eMMC 闪存快，因此数据传输相当快，加载时间也可以承受。

	Lenovo Tab M10 5G	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	Lenovo Tab P11 5G	Xiaomi Pad 6	OnePlus Pad	Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-49%	22%	111%	191%	19%	44%
Sequential Read 256KB	500.8	277.2 -45%	921.5 84%	1673.97 234%	1866.48 273%	728 ?(303 - 1038, n=71) 45%	1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years) 109%
Sequential Write 256KB	470.4	210.4 -55%	415.2 -12%	745.32 58%	1616.83 244%	527 ?(103.2 - 903, n=71) 12%	684 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years) 45%
Random Read 4KB	186.4	105.1 -44%	174.6 -6%	298.45 60%	341.39 83%	191.7 ?(89.3 - 297, n=71) 3%	189.2 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years) 2%
Random Write 4KB	159.3	78.5 -51%	195.4 23%	304.34 91%	420.93 164%	185.8 ?(62.6 - 419, n=71) 17%	189.5 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years) 19%

游戏 - 可以 30 帧/秒的速度进行游戏

由于大多数移动游戏都是为在速度较慢的设备上运行而设计的，因此你当然可以在 Tab M10 5G 上玩游戏。任何期望通过 90 Hz 屏幕达到 60 帧或更高帧数的人都会失望：我们使用GameBench 软件包在《PUBG Mobile》中以极低的设置测得的最高帧数为每秒 40 帧，在《暗黑破坏神：不朽》中测得的最高帧数为每秒 30 帧。软件包。

通过触摸屏和位置传感器进行控制非常顺畅，考虑到 10.6 英寸的屏幕，大部分按键也非常大。需要注意的是，小手很难触及到所有按钮，而且重量会让你的手臂比智能手机更容易疲劳。

Lenovo Tab M10 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.9.0: Ø39.9 (36-41)

Lenovo Tab M10 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.9.0: Ø29.9 (29-31)

Lenovo Tab M10 5G; Diablo Immortal; Medium Mobile Low; 2.1.2: Ø30 (29-31)

Lenovo Tab M10 5G; Diablo Immortal; Ultra Mobile Very High; 2.1.2: Ø29.8 (26-31)

排放 - 几乎不加热，也不节流

温度

即使在持续负载的情况下，我们测试设备的最高温度也只有 35 °C，几乎无法察觉。

3DMark 压力测试表明，SoC 的性能即使在长时间负载后也不会受到影响。

Max. Load

Idle


31.5 °C	28.6 °C	26.1 °C
29.7 °C	27.7 °C	25.6 °C
28.7 °C	26.5 °C	25.6 °C

Maximum: 31.5 °C
Average: 27.8 °C


26.6 °C	33.5 °C	35 °C
26.6 °C	26.9 °C	30.6 °C
26 °C	27.9 °C	28.5 °C

Maximum: 35 °C
Average: 29.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.3 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.6 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Lenovo Tab M10 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.24 (7.23-7.25)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.14 (3.13-3.16)

Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø6.69 (6.68-6.71)

Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø21.5 (21.1-25.4)

OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø41.2 (35.1-48.8)

Lenovo Tab M10 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.16 (2.15-2.18)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø0.799 (0.789-0.809)

Lenovo Tab P11 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.02 (1.957-2.03)

Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø6.27 (6.1-7.39)

OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø12.5 (12-14.1)

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Lenovo Tab M10 5G	98.7 (2.15^min - 2.18^max) %
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	97.5 (0.789^min - 0.809^max) % -1%
Lenovo Tab P11 5G	96.3 (1.957^min - 2.03^max) % -2%
OnePlus Pad	84.8 (12^min - 14.1^max) % -14%
Xiaomi Pad 6	82.5 (6.1^min - 7.39^max) % -16%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Tab M10 5G	99.7 (7.23^min - 7.25^max) %
Lenovo Tab P11 5G	99.5 (6.68^min - 6.71^max) % 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	99.3 (3.13^min - 3.16^max) % 0%
Xiaomi Pad 6	83.1 (21.1^min - 25.4^max) % -17%
OnePlus Pad	72 (35.1^min - 48.8^max) % -28%

Legend

Lenovo Tab M10 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 UNISOC T610, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Tab P11 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Xiaomi Pad 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

OnePlus Pad MediaTek Dimensity 9000, ARM Mali-G710 MP10,

发言人

联想 Tab M10 5G 的机身左右两侧各有两个扬声器。在横向模式下，有轻微的立体声效果。虽然扬声器能充分再现语音，但在播放音乐时缺乏丰富的音效，而且高音略重。

通过 3.5 毫米插孔或蓝牙连接外部设备更为有趣。它运行良好，支持最重要的无线音频编解码器，包括 SBC、AAC、aptX 和 aptX HD 以及 LDAC。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Lenovo Tab M10 5G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

OnePlus Pad audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能量管理 - 良好的耐力

耗电量

在功耗方面，联想 Tab M10 5G 相当节俭，无论是在空闲模式还是在高负载情况下，电池的耗电量都很适中。

该平板电脑支持 20 瓦的最大充电速度。由于电池容量较大，达到 100% 电量可能需要 3 个小时。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.2 / 1.4 / 1.9 Watt
Load	3.5 / 5.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Lenovo Tab M10 5G 7700 mAh	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 5100 mAh	Lenovo Tab P11 5G 7500 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 6 8840 mAh	OnePlus Pad 9510 mAh
Power Consumption		-64%	-88%	-164%	-228%
Idle Minimum *	1.2	1.9 -58%	1.1 8%	0.96 20%	3.64 -203%
Idle Average *	1.4	2.1 -50%	3.3 -136%	4.91 -251%	6.84 -389%
Idle Maximum *	1.9	2.5 -32%	4 -111%	5.07 -167%	7.15 -276%
Load Average *	3.5	7.6 -117%	7.2 -106%	11.8 -237%	8.98 -157%
Load Maximum *	5.6	9 -61%	11 -96%	15.9 -184%	11.9 -113%

* ... smaller is better

Power input: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Lenovo Tab M10 5G: Ø2.63 (1.342-5.56)

Power input: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Lenovo Tab M10 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4 (3.77-4.28)

Lenovo Tab M10 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.635 (1.474-1.972)

电池寿命

联想 Tab M10 5G 电池容量高达 7700 毫安时，因此续航时间很长。在我们的 WLAN 测试中，大容量电池和低功耗的结合带来了 15:44 小时的惊人续航时间，超过了所有同价位设备。

在进行观看电影或玩游戏等高需求活动时，这款平板电脑也能延长电池续航时间，使其成为对比设备中整体续航时间的佼佼者。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		33h 24min
WiFi Websurfing		15h 44min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		18h 29min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 57min

	Lenovo Tab M10 5G 7700 mAh	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 5100 mAh	Lenovo Tab P11 5G 7500 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 6 8840 mAh	OnePlus Pad 9510 mAh
Battery Runtime		-13%	-12%	-13%	-18%
Reader / Idle	2004	1952 -3%	1732 -14%	2154 7%	1345 -33%
H.264	1109	1002 -10%	943 -15%	741 -33%	963 -13%
WiFi v1.3	944	861 -9%	762 -19%	823 -13%	648 -31%
Load	297	213 -28%	298 0%	265 -11%	310 4%

Pros

+ 相当轻便

+ 电池寿命长

+ 精确跟踪

+ 无 PWM 的明亮 IPS 屏幕

+ 移动通信，包括电话功能

Cons

- 相对昂贵

- 只有塑料外壳

- 只有 USB 2.0 端口

- 无线局域网速度慢

- 性能低

- 摄像头质量差

结论 - 性价比不高

联想 Tab M10 5G 属于联想的低价平板电脑系列，在许多方面都有别于更昂贵的 Tab P11 5G。它采用塑料外壳、2 个扬声器（而不是 4 个）、单 USB 2.0 端口、不太先进的 WLAN 以及整体性能较弱的 SoC。

令人惊讶的是，联想为这两款平板电脑定价相同。尽管 Tab M10 5G 因其更便宜的组件而提供了更好的降价机会，但目前还没有降价的迹象。

如果你能以低于 200 美元的价格买到 Tab M10 5G，它可能会是一个引人注目的便宜货。值得一提的功能包括延长电池续航时间、轻巧的设计、相对简洁的Android 体验和手机功能。此外，它还具有良好的定位功能，并支持使用手写笔。

联想 Tab M10 5G 可提供出色的运行时间和移动通信功能，但由于性能较低和 Wi-Fi 网速较慢，目前价格相当昂贵。

相比之下，Xiaomi Pad 6 性能出众且支持手写笔。OnePlus Pad 也明显更快，不过两者都缺乏移动通信功能。

价格和供应情况

联想 Tab M10 5G 可直接从联想购买。

该平板电脑还可在其他在线零售商处购买，如Best Buy。

Lenovo Tab M10 5G - 11/14/2023 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

82 / 98 → 84%

Keyboard

65 / 80 → 82%

Pointing Device

86%

Connectivity

49 / 70 → 71%

Weight

83 / 40-88 → 90%

Battery

91%

Display

82%

Games Performance

25 / 78 → 32%

Application Performance

71 / 92 → 77%

Temperature

96%

Noise

100%

Audio

67 / 91 → 74%

Camera

49 / 85 → 57%

Average

73%

83%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.