电信 T 平板电脑评测--5G 和长时间更新，价格低廉

Name: Telekom T Tablet
Brand: Telekom

5G 便宜。

Telekom 依靠自己的智能手机，现在也有了平板电脑。T 平板电脑已经问世，它完全依赖于移动数据。由于其 5G 功能，据称该设备将始终保持连接。此外，它与谷歌的合作确保了软件的轻薄和持久支持。中大奖了吗？

Benedikt Winkel, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 09/29/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Tablet Touchscreen

电信公司希望在移动终端设备领域分一杯羹。继T Phone和T Phone Pro这款 10.4 英寸平板电脑的 MRSP 约为 230 美元，绝不是一款高端设备，但它的 5G 连接、双 SIM 卡和三年的每月安全补丁无疑是这个价位的一个良好开端。

这个价位的平板电脑大多只能通过 WiFi 连接，很少能使用 LTE。反过来，5G 连接也是 T Tablet 的独特之处。通常情况下，要购买这种移动标准的设备至少需要支付双倍的费用。

T Tablet 只有一种尺寸、配置和颜色：10.4 英寸显示屏、128 GB 存储空间和 6 GB 内存的 "暗影 "版。该设备的实际制造商是 Wingtech，但 Telekom 将其作为自己的品牌进行销售。

Test device courtesy of Deutsche Telekom

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Telekom T Tablet

Processor

MediaTek Dimensity 700 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G57 MP2

Memory

6 GB

Display

10.40 inch 5:3, 2000 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, capacitive, TFT-LCD, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Storage

128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB

, 112 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass, OTG

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, GSM (Band 2, 3, 5, 85); WCDMA (Band 1, 2, 5, 8); LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, , 20, 28, 38); 5G (Band N1, N3, N7, N28, N38, N66, N78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.8 x 247.6 x 157.1

Battery

7000 mAh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 8 MPix + 2 Mpix Depth
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: onscreen, USB cable (USB-A to USB-C), SIM needle, 24 Months Warranty, SAR (body) 1,34 W/kg; GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1); SBAS (L1), fanless

Weight

490 g

Price

219 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
81.5 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2023	Telekom T Tablet Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2	490 g	7.8 mm	10.40"	2000x1200
84.6 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2022	Xiaomi Redmi Pad Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2	445 g	7.05 mm	10.61"	2000x1200
77.8 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2023	Blackview Tab 12 Pro T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1	430 g	7.4 mm	10.10"	1920x1200
81 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2022	Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 T618, Mali-G52 MP2	508 g	6.9 mm	10.50"	1920x1200
81.7 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2022	Honor Pad 8 SD 680, Adreno 610	520 g	6.9 mm	12.00"	2000x1200

外壳 - Telekom 使用塑料和铝

电信公司在 T Tablet 上采用了多种材料。背面（也包括两侧短边）由铝制成。反过来，它的边框由塑料制成--Telekom 没有透露使用何种保护性显示屏玻璃的信息。

前置摄像头位于长边的一侧，电源和音量按钮位于顶部，SIM 卡插槽位于底部。两个立体声扬声器都位于短边。T Tablet 通过了 IP52 认证，SIM 卡槽周围的密封条表明它至少有一定的防水功能。另一方面，向下按压设备背面时，会有空气从设备中排出的声音。

除了背面可以按压，平板电脑的稳定性也不错。设备对划痕似乎也不太敏感。不过，按键有些松动。背面的相机合集有点突出--当你把平板电脑放在桌子上打字时，只有左下方的区域会有点晃动。

尺寸比较

Honor Pad 8 Xiaomi Redmi Pad Telekom T Tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Blackview Tab 12 Pro DIN A5 ❌

连接性 - T Tablet 的存储空间可以扩展

Telekom 安装了联发科 Dimensity 700SoC 与ARM Mali-G57 MP2图形处理器和 6GB RAM。该配置采用了与T Phone Pro.它的 128GB 存储空间可通过 microSD 卡扩展。

遗憾的是，T Tablet 的购买者不得不放弃音频插孔。它的 USB-C 连接是 2.0 标准，不支持通过 USB 电缆输出图片，也不支持 exFAT 和 NTFS。在我们的复制测试中，该设备的传输速率达到了 23.88 MB/s。

Telekom 最初宣布 T Tablet 将支持 NFC - 在本评论的早期版本中也是这么说的。当我们询问制造商时，他们表示事实并非如此。T Tablet 并不具备 NFC 功能，这在本评测的前一版本中也有提及。

microSD 读卡器

T Tablet 的存储空间可通过 microSD 卡进行扩展。该设备可接受最大 2 TB 的卡。但不支持 exFAT 标准。在我们使用 AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60 作为参考卡进行的测试中，Telekom 平板电脑的表现相当不错。

其传输速度比小米红米平板电脑或Blackview Tab 12 Pro.只有三星Galaxy Tab A8的传输速度几乎是它的三倍。特别是与红米 Pad 相比，T Tablet 的数据传输速率非常稳定。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	49.18 MB/s +189%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	17.02 MB/s
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	9.48 MB/s -44%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	7.61 MB/s -55%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø39.5 (25.2-50.5)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø35.8 (6.67-45.8)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32.7 (13.3-40.3)

Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø68.7 (14-80.3)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø66.1 (7.54-78.5)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.6 (37.9-86.8)

软件 - T 平板电脑的大量更新

电信公司表示，该平板电脑是与谷歌合作开发的。因此，制造商依赖于股票Android 。我们很高兴地看到，该设备没有安装任何臃肿的软件。此外，还安装了谷歌儿童空间，以及专为儿童设计的书籍、应用程序和电影。为了使用这些内容，您必须为孩子创建一个单独的帐户。

从左向右滑动不会带你进入谷歌卡片，而是带你进入谷歌娱乐空间。它可以显示来自流媒体网站的电影和连续剧、游戏、书籍以及来自你自己的图书馆或你使用的供应商提供的播客。

据制造商称，T 平板电脑将在三年内每月提供安全补丁。第四年，将每季度提供一次。该平板电脑还将接受一些重大更新--据制造商称，计划接受Android 14 和 15 更新。Android 企业推荐 "计划认证目前正在进行中。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - T Tablet 可精确定位

说到 WiFi 传输速率，所有测试机型都非常接近。结合我们的参考路由器--华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000，T Tablet 遥遥领先。此外，它的传输速率也很稳定。不过，它只支持 WiFi 5。

对于这个价位的产品来说，一个特别之处是它支持包括 5G 在内的移动数据。在我们的测试中，它的接收效果很好，不过，它的连接和所选网络类型的波动比许多其他设备要大一些。它的频率覆盖范围很好，但平板电脑并不独立支持 5G。

该设备支持双 SIM 卡。它可以支持一张实体 Nano SIM 卡和一张 eSIM 卡。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	371 (365^min - 371^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	367 (358^min - 370^max) MBit/s -1%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	345 (326^min - 357^max) MBit/s -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	325 (163^min - 328^max) MBit/s -12%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	309 (300^min - 324^max) MBit/s -17%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	372 (358^min - 381^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	369 (179^min - 379^max) MBit/s -1%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	367 (357^min - 380^max) MBit/s -1%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	357 (323^min - 366^max) MBit/s -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	349 (178^min - 357^max) MBit/s -6%

Telekom T Tablet MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø369 (365-371)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø367 (358-370)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø319 (163-328)

Telekom T Tablet MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø372 (358-381)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø363 (179-379)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø343 (178-357)

T Tablet 支持 GPS、Glonass 和 Galileo 卫星系统，但只能进行单声道连接。从与我们的参考设备 Garmin Venu 2 一起进行的测试中可以看出，它的定位性能还是相当不错的。

平板电脑在室外的定位尤其快速准确。而在室内则需要相当长的时间，而且连接波动很大。

相机 - T Tablet 可在光线充足的条件下拍摄出漂亮的照片

Telekom 可能在 T 平板电脑的背面安装了两个镜头，但 200 万像素的镜头仅用于获取深度信息。800 万像素镜头是平板电脑的主摄像头。前置镜头的分辨率相同。

摄像头的性能完全可以满足典型的平板电脑使用需求，包括视频通话和拍摄快照。它的主摄像头还能描绘出不错的细节。遗憾的是，它的色彩准确度不是最好的。在弱光条件下，摄像头很快就会达到极限--它可能不会描绘出任何颗粒，但暗部会呈现黑色，这意味着根本无法识别。T Tablet 甚至还具有所谓的专业模式，可让您手动设置 ISO、白平衡、光圈和光线校正。

T Tablet 可以 1080p 和 30 FPS 的最大速度录制视频。它的声音录制效果不错，但画面很快就会变得摇摆不定--自动对焦和自动光照调节有点不可靠。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Rabbit Lake Zoom 5x Low Light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

交货和保修范围 - T 平板电脑不保修

T Tablet 的供货范围安排得非常清楚。除平板电脑本身外，包装内还包括一根 USB 电缆（USB-A 转 USB-C）、一个 SIM 卡工具和一本快速入门指南。

T Tablet 只提供法律规定的本地保修。

输入设备和操作 - T 平板电脑仅支持面部解锁

Telekom T Tablet 依赖于谷歌的 G Board 键盘。在我们的测试中，输入没有任何错误。总的来说，这款平板电脑的触摸屏在各方面都很出色和可靠，但玻璃的滑动性能和易沾染指纹的特性并不突出。

T Tablet 没有配备指纹扫描仪。除了密码、密码或图案外，您还可以通过二维面部扫描解锁设备。这样就可以完全跳过锁屏。但遗憾的是，你只能保存一次扫描。此外，在我们的测试中，面部解锁的工作并不稳定，其识别率和速度都有待提高。

显示屏 - 仅 60 赫兹，但足够明亮

T Tablet 采用 10.4 英寸 TFT LC 显示屏，宽高比为 5:3。其刷新率为 60 Hz，且无法更改。在 APL18 测试中，我们测得最大亮度为 512 cd/m²。这一数值使 T Tablet 在对比领域名列前茅。

无论是否使用环境光传感器，该平板电脑都能达到这一最高亮度。面板不均匀的背光有点恼人，尤其是在显示浅色内容时。

在测试过程中，我们测得显示屏有些闪烁。不过，28,520 Hz 的频率非常高，我们预计在使用时不会出现任何问题。


470 cd/m²	479 cd/m²	462 cd/m²
481 cd/m²	529 cd/m²	487 cd/m²
483 cd/m²	508 cd/m²	473 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 529 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 485.8 cd/m² Minimum: 3.68 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 529 cd/m²
Contrast: 945:1 (Black: 0.56 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 10.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.17

	Telekom T Tablet TFT-LCD, 2000x1200, 10.4"	Xiaomi Redmi Pad IPS, 2000x1200, 10.6"	Blackview Tab 12 Pro IPS LCD, 1920x1200, 10.1"	Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.5"	Honor Pad 8 IPS, 2000x1200, 12"
Screen		35%	-9%	-3%	19%
Brightness middle	529	418 -21%	371 -30%	368 -30%	379 -28%
Brightness	486	402 -17%	348 -28%	346 -29%	382 -21%
Brightness Distribution	87	90 3%	82 -6%	91 5%	84 -3%
Black Level *	0.56	0.28 50%	0.48 14%	0.61 -9%	0.3 46%
Contrast	945	1493 58%	773 -18%	603 -36%	1263 34%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	9.6	2.3 76%	8.6 10%	6.9 28%	4.76 50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	14.4	5.4 62%	15.4 -7%	11.4 21%	9.25 36%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	10.5	3.7 65%	11.3 -8%	7.7 27%	6.7 36%
Gamma	2.17 ^101%	2.21 ^100%	2.04 ^108%	2.16 ^102%	2.234 ^98%
CCT	10482 ^62%	6595 ^99%	9728 ^67%	8547 ^76%	8468 ^77%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

38520 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 38520 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 38520 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

平板电脑的色彩准确度还有待提高。显示屏与目标色彩和灰度值有很大偏差。白色色调带有相当浓重的蓝色调。此外，色彩饱和度也过低。根据我们的 Calman 2D 测量，sRGB 色彩空间的覆盖率仅为 90.9%。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
17.36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.635 ms rise
17.36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11.72 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18.99 ms rise
44.13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 25.14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

显示内容在室外依然清晰可辨，但我们希望在阳光下能看到更好的亮度水平，以更好地平衡反光。显示屏的视角稳定性很好。

性能 - T Tablet 甚至能驾驭当前的游戏

联发科联发科 Dimensity 700在 T Tablet 上的表现比在T Phone Pro.其日常性能良好。应用程序启动速度很快，即使是多任务处理也不会给平板电脑带来任何困难。Telekom 设备在基准测试中没有受到任何影响。它的性能与对比设备处于同一水平，仅次于红米平板电脑.

您还可以在该设备上玩《PUBG Mobile》等当前流行的游戏，其最大支持分辨率为高清。不过，在高清状态下运行时，帧率仍然较低，细节也会减少。

安装的存储速度较低。T Tablet 使用的是 eMMC 存储器。因此，存储速度大致与三星Galaxy Tab A8大致相当，但所有其他对比设备的速度都要快得多。

PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | AImark | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)	9847 Points +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	9475 Points +14%
Telekom T Tablet	8329 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (6492 - 10433, n=11)	8048 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	7447 Points -11%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro	6859 Points -18%
Honor Pad 8	6655 Points -20%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)	773 Points +45%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	575 Points +8%
Telekom T Tablet	534 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (371 - 534, n=5)	496 Points -7%
Honor Pad 8	407 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	361 Points -32%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro	355 Points -34%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)	4205 Points +48%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	2988 Points +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (2779 - 3107, n=8)	2926 Points +3%
Telekom T Tablet	2839 Points
Honor Pad 8	2621 Points -8%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro	1954 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	1839 Points -35%
System
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)	7265 Points +47%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	6509 Points +32%
Honor Pad 8	5817 Points +18%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (4888 - 6712, n=8)	5669 Points +15%
Telekom T Tablet	4934 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	4729 Points -4%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro	4332 Points -12%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)	4862 Points +24%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (3685 - 4473, n=8)	4100 Points +5%
Telekom T Tablet	3923 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	3550 Points -10%
Honor Pad 8	3361 Points -14%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro	3095 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	970 Points -75%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)	9168 Points +244%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	2875 Points +8%
Telekom T Tablet	2667 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (2398 - 2676, n=8)	2572 Points -4%
Honor Pad 8	2098 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	2001 Points -25%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro	989 Points -63%
Web
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)	1269 Points +1%
Telekom T Tablet	1258 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	1246 Points -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (1083 - 1353, n=8)	1237 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	1201 Points -5%
Honor Pad 8	1151 Points -9%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro	1123 Points -11%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=50, last 2 years)	7290 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (949 - 979, n=2)	964 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	892 Points

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)	11323 Points +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	9213 Points +2%
Telekom T Tablet	9056 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (4863 - 9243, n=5)	6899 Points -24%
Honor Pad 8	4627 Points -49%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro	3748 Points -59%

Legend

Telekom T Tablet MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Blackview Tab 12 Pro Unisoc T7200 (T606), ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Honor Pad 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Average MediaTek Dimensity 700

Average of class Tablet

该平板电脑的图形处理器性能也与此类似。电信公司采用了Mali-G52 MP2图形处理器--与红米 Pad和三星Galaxy Pad A8 采用的是同一款图形处理器。在基准测试中，T Tablet 的表现与红米设备类似红米设备- 但都将三星平板电脑甩在了后面。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	329 Points +3%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	318 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	179 Points -44%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	122 Points -62%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	121 Points -62%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	343 Points +5%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	326 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	184 Points -44%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	123 Points -62%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	113 Points -65%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1215 Points +4%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1171 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	708 Points -40%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	445 Points -62%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	404 Points -65%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1237 Points +5%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1173 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	712 Points -39%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	447 Points -62%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	414 Points -65%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2644 Points +5%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2511 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1463 Points -42%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1356 Points -46%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	976 Points -61%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2442 Points +5%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2321 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1284 Points -45%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1184 Points -49%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	825 Points -64%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3717 Points +6%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	3516 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2865 Points -19%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2751 Points -22%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2637 Points -25%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	55 fps +8%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	51 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	39 fps -24%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps -31%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	63 fps +3%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	61 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	41 fps -33%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	41 fps -33%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps +3%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	34 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	25 fps -26%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps -44%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps +5%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	38 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	26 fps -32%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps -42%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23 fps 0%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	23 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps -35%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps -43%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps +4%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	24 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps -37%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps -37%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps +8%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	12 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9.2 fps -23%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.2 fps -40%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps 0%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9.7 fps -35%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.3 fps -45%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.4 fps +1%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.3 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	6 fps -28%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4.9 fps -41%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.4 fps +4%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.2 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3.6 fps -31%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.2 fps -38%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps 0%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	12 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9.9 fps -17%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.4 fps -30%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps +8%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	13 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	10 fps -23%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.6 fps -26%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2.4 fps +9%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2.2 fps
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1.4 fps -36%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	fps -100%

Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | Speedometer 2.0 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=70, last 2 years)	111.2 Points +91%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)	58.17 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	55.842 Points -4%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro (Chrome 115)	48.464 Points -17%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	46.797 Points -20%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (36 - 58.2, n=8)	45.6 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	43.98 Points -24%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=69, last 2 years)	106.9 Points +91%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	56 Points 0%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)	56 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (50 - 59, n=4)	54.3 Points -3%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro (Chrome 115)	51 Points -9%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	48 Points -14%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years)	121.9 runs/min
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	40.54 runs/min
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	38.1 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (34.4 - 41.7, n=6)	37.4 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	33.35 runs/min

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years)	29371 Points +34%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)	21843 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	17557 Points -20%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (15352 - 21843, n=9)	17130 Points -22%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	13831 Points -37%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro (Chrome 115)	12642 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	10787 Points -51%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years)	3734 ms * -70%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro (Chrome 115)	3186.8 ms * -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	3060 ms * -39%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	2873.8 ms * -31%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (2195 - 3387, n=8)	2693 ms * -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	2443.7 ms * -11%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)	2194.9 ms *

* ... smaller is better

	Telekom T Tablet	Xiaomi Redmi Pad	Blackview Tab 12 Pro	Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	Honor Pad 8	Average 128 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		318%	88%	-11%	227%	11%	243%
Sequential Read 256KB	287.1	976.9 240%	512.71 79%	255.1 -11%	833.56 190%	284 ?(106.7 - 511, n=77) -1%	1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years) 264%
Sequential Write 256KB	188.3	883.6 369%	196.44 4%	101.1 -46%	708.51 276%	194.6 ?(72.3 - 314, n=77) 3%	686 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years) 264%
Random Read 4KB	52.8	250.82 375%	129.56 145%	68.3 29%	189.57 259%	82.7 ?(8.63 - 247, n=77) 57%	189.4 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years) 259%
Random Write 4KB	66.55	257.02 286%	149.89 125%	57.5 -14%	186.95 181%	55.4 ?(3.84 - 159.9, n=77) -17%	189.9 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years) 185%

排放 - T 平板电脑保持凉爽，并具有立体声功能

温度 - Telekom 平板电脑保持凉爽

T Tablet 在日常使用和压力测试环境下都能保持低温。我们测得的温度为 38 °C，在此温度下仍可舒适地使用该设备。

Max. Load

Idle


38 °C	35.6 °C	32.2 °C
34.9 °C	33.7 °C	33 °C
36.1 °C	32.7 °C	32 °C

Maximum: 38 °C
Average: 34.2 °C


33.2 °C	37.2 °C	37.7 °C
32.6 °C	34.9 °C	35.5 °C
32.1 °C	33.6 °C	34.1 °C

Maximum: 37.7 °C
Average: 34.5 °C

Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.09 (7.07-7.1)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.26 (4.25-4.27)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø1.096 (1.091-1.101)

Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.02 (6.99-7.03)

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	99.2 (1.091^min - 1.101^max) %
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	97.9 (2.03^min - 2.07^max) %
Honor Pad 8	97.3 (0.728^min - 0.748^max) %
Blackview Tab 12 Pro	%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor Pad 8	99.7 (2.67^min - 2.68^max) % 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	99.6 (4.25^min - 4.27^max) % 0%
Telekom T Tablet	99.6 (7.07^min - 7.1^max) %
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	99 (7.39^min - 7.47^max) % -1%
Blackview Tab 12 Pro	98.9 (2.49^min - 2.52^max) % -1%
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Telekom T Tablet	99.5 (6.99^min - 7.03^max) %

Legend

Telekom T Tablet MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Blackview Tab 12 Pro Unisoc T7200 (T606), ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Honor Pad 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

扬声器 - T Tablet 上的立体声音效

T Tablet 有两个立体声扬声器，分别位于平板电脑的短边。在我们的测试中，扬声器的位置并不是最好的，因为在游戏时它们很快就会被遮住。它们的最大音量足够大，可以为多人提供足够的声音。不过，它们的音色变化不大，听起来与智能手机扬声器很相似。

它们普遍缺少低音和低频，反过来，高音又过于突出。即使全音量也不会导致背面振动。Telekom 平板电脑没有音频插孔。声音可以通过 USB-C 端口或蓝牙输出。T Tablet 支持以下编解码器：SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、LDAC、LHDC V3/V4 和 LHDC-V。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Telekom T Tablet audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - T 平板电脑在负载情况下耗电量大

耗电量

与同类产品相比，T 平板电脑的功耗相当高。与同类产品相比，它的负载值尤其高，不过我们也改变了测试方法。目前，我们使用的是 "Burnout Benchmark "基准测试，它比老式的 "稳定性测试 "对设备的要求更高。

在空闲模式下，Telekom 平板电脑与三星Galaxy Tab A8 处于同一水平。Honor Pad 8 的节俭程度令人难以置信。在本次测试中，移动数据被停用，因此可以将 5G 排除在消费者之外。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.15 / 0.27 Watt
Idle	1.28 / 4.52 / 4.58 Watt
Load	10.5 / 11.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Telekom T Tablet 7000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Pad 8000 mAh	Blackview Tab 12 Pro 6580 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 7040 mAh	Honor Pad 8 7250 mAh
Power Consumption		27%	36%	10%	46%
Idle Minimum *	1.28	0.93 27%	0.98 23%	1.19 7%	1.1 14%
Idle Average *	4.52	4.02 11%	3 34%	4.63 -2%	1.5 67%
Idle Maximum *	4.58	4.07 11%	3.14 31%	4.68 -2%	2.1 54%
Load Average *	10.5	5.52 47%	4.19 60%	7.27 31%	4.4 58%
Load Maximum *	11.2	6.89 38%	7.73 31%	9.17 18%	7.2 36%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Telekom T Tablet MediaTek Dimensity 700: Ø4.06 (2.09-6.83)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618: Ø5.07 (2.29-8.38)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Telekom T Tablet MediaTek Dimensity 700; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.43 (3.24-3.89)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.62 (4.01-5.11)

Telekom T Tablet MediaTek Dimensity 700; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.19 (2.16-2.22)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.42 (2.33-2.92)

运行时间--T 平板电脑有耐力

在我们进行的实际 Wi-Fi 上网冲浪测试中，尽管 T Tablet 的基本耗电量较高，但仍表现出色。它的运行时间接近 13 小时，因此比三星三星Galaxy Tab A8和Honor Pad 8.在日常使用中，即使激活了蜂窝网络连接，也能连续使用数天。

不过，平板电脑漫长的充电时间令人讨厌。Telekom 没有随 T 平板电脑提供电源适配器，因此我们将它连接到一个 66 瓦的充电器上。从 0 到 100% 的电量需要 5 个小时。Telekom 没有指定快速充电标准。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		12h 55min

	Telekom T Tablet 7000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Pad 8000 mAh	Blackview Tab 12 Pro 6580 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 7040 mAh	Honor Pad 8 7250 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	775	1057 36%	817 5%	679 -12%	733 -5%

Pros

+ 5G 连接

+ 超长软件支持

+ 可扩展存储

Cons

- 充电时间长

- 无保修，仅保证

结论 - Telekom 首次亮相取得成功

Telekom 的 T Tablet 首次亮相就取得了成功。这款设备没有任何真正的弱点--在这个价位上，它的 5G 功能尤其令人印象深刻。它的屏幕可能只能以 60 Hz 的频率显示内容，但反过来却相对明亮。此外，该平板电脑还支持Android 和长期更新。

它的摄像头和扬声器也很不错。其性能足以满足日常使用，甚至可以轻松运行当前的游戏。这款平板电脑的做工和边框都不像高端设备--但 230 美元的售价并不意味着必须如此。

T Tablet 功能齐全，支持 5G，在连接选项方面几乎没有任何空白--T Tablet 做了很多正确的事情。

更快的充电速度和连接耳机的选项仍是我们的愿望。除此之外，T Tablet 的功能非常丰富，而且物超所值。小米小米红米平板电脑提供 90Hz 显示屏、四个扬声器和稍好的性能，但它没有 GPS 功能或连接移动数据的选项。三星三星Galaxy Tab A8性能稍差，存储空间较小。不过，它拥有更好的扬声器和更高质量的外壳。

价格和供应情况

在撰写本文时，Telekom T 平板电脑只能通过 Telekom 的德国在线商店购买。.其他在线零售商尚未有该产品。该设备的售价约为 230 美元。

Telekom T Tablet - 09/22/2023 v7 ^(old)
Benedikt Winkel

Chassis

76 / 98 → 77%

Keyboard

69 / 80 → 87%

Pointing Device

86%

Connectivity

46 / 70 → 66%

Weight

83 / 40-88 → 90%

Battery

90%

Display

79%

Games Performance

26 / 78 → 34%

Application Performance

66 / 92 → 72%

Temperature

91%

Noise

100%

Audio

76 / 91 → 84%

Camera

45 / 85 → 53%

Average

67%

82%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.