Teclast T50HD 平板电脑评测--经济实惠的 11 英寸全能型平板电脑Android 14

Name: Teclast T50 HD
Brand: Teclast

好的娱乐

作为一款价格低廉的 11 英寸平板电脑，Teclast T50HD 拥有丰富的功能选择。除了Android 14 之外，它还配备了 256 GB 存储空间、明亮的 IPS 显示屏、DRM Widevine L1，甚至还支持 4G 双 SIM 卡。我们的评测将揭示这款入门级平板电脑是否值得推荐。

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 05/14/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Tablet Touchscreen

中国制造商 Teclast 有大量经济实惠的平板电脑在售。这些平板电脑都不提供高端性能或疯狂的功能。反过来，你可以获得平板电脑日常使用所需的一切。Teclast T50HD 也是如此，它在网上的售价已低于 150 美元。

11 英寸 T50HD 采用分辨率为 1920 x 1200 像素的 IPS 显示屏。此外，该机还配备了 256 GB UFS 存储、8000 毫安时电池、4G 支持和Android 14（谷歌最新版操作系统）。

T50HD 的 Unisoc T606速度足以满足多媒体、网上冲浪和玩简单游戏的需要。此外，它还通过了 DRM Widevine L1 认证，可确保在 Netflix 和其他视频网站上进行高分辨率流媒体播放。

Test device courtesy of Teclast Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Teclast T50 HD (T Series)

Processor

Unisoc T7200 8 x 1.6 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G57 MP1

Memory

6 GB

, LPDDR4X

Display

10.95 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 207 PPI, Touchscreen, IPS, 300 nits typ. brightness, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB

, 243 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm headset jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: brightness sensor, gravity sensor, hall sensor

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (Band 2/3/5/8), 3G (1/2/5/8) 4G (1/3/5/7/8/20/34/38/39/40/41), GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 257.1 x 169.2

Battery

8000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 10 watt charging

Operating System

Android 14

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix LED flash
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix LED flash

Additional features

Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, 10W charger (5V/2A), USB-C cable, SIM tool, Quick start guide, Warranty card, 12 Months Warranty, Camera2 API Limited, fanless

Weight

500 g, Power Supply: 43 g

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
81.7 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2024	Teclast T50 HD T7200, Mali-G57 MP1	500 g	7.9 mm	10.95"	1920x1200
80.4 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2024	Blackview Tab 80 T7200, Mali-G57 MP1	484 g	7.5 mm	10.10"	1280x800
84.2 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2024	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ SD 695 5G, Adreno 619	480 g	6.9 mm	11.00"	1920x1200
79.3 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2024	Teclast M50 T7200, Mali-G57 MP1	460 g	8 mm	10.10"	1280x800
81.5 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2023	Telekom T Tablet Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2	490 g	7.8 mm	10.40"	2000x1200
83.5 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2024	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE SD 680, Adreno 610	481 g	7.36 mm	11.00"	1920x1200

外壳 - Teclast T50HD 采用铝制外壳

T50HD 的铝制外壳边缘圆润，看起来非常漂亮，你根本看不出这款 Teclast 平板电脑有多便宜。它的边框宽度约为 1 厘米，这让这款 11 英寸设备看起来相当现代，同时确保您在握持它时不会意外激活触摸屏。

T50HD 没有通过 IP 认证，如果你真的想要，你可以很容易地凹陷和扭曲 7.9 毫米厚的外壳。即便如此，这款平板电脑在日常使用中也足够稳定，500 克的重量也不算太重，这意味着你可以用一只手握住它很长时间。

另一方面，我们不太喜欢制造商在平板电脑上预装屏幕保护膜的做法。由于屏幕保护膜相对较软，你几乎无法避免留下一两处划痕--在我们的测试过程中，即使我们小心翼翼地操作平板电脑，划痕还是很快就出现了。

Teclast T50HD 只有一种颜色，灰色磨砂后盖。背面最抢眼的设计元素是采用高光处理的摄像头模块和 "AI 双摄像头 "字样。这看起来很整洁，暗示着先进的技术--但遗憾的是，这显然是表象多于实际，因为摄像头并不能提供比快照质量更高的效果。

尺寸比较

连接性 - 256 GB 存储空间和双卡双待

T50HD 配备了充足的内存和存储空间，分别为 6 GB 和 256 GB。Teclast 甚至提到了最高 14 GB 的内存，不过，额外的 8 GB 内存并没有带来多少好处，因为它们是通过内部存储中的交换文件提供的，而交换文件的运行速度要比内存慢得多。内存扩展默认为激活状态，但可随时通过Android 设置关闭。

T50HD 的 USB-C 端口以 USB-2.0 的速度运行，并支持 USB-OTG，例如可以将 USB 驱动器连接到平板电脑。您还可以通过 microSD 插槽扩展其内部存储空间，该插槽支持最大 1 TB 的存储卡。您还可以直接在旁边插入 SIM 卡。如果你决定不使用 microSD 卡，那么实际上你甚至可以同时插入两张 SIM 卡。该设备还配有一个用于音频设备的 3.5 毫米插孔。

microSD 读卡器

结合我们的 Angelbird AV Pro V60 参考卡，该读卡器在同价位产品中实现了非常好的数据吞吐量。在连续读写测试中，它与三星 Tab A9+ 内的读卡器一样快。三星Galaxy Tab A9+.在复制测试中，它领先于大多数对比设备，达到了 41.2 MByte/s。只有三星平板电脑在这方面更快。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	47.18 MB/s +15%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	41.2 MB/s
Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	30.5 MB/s -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	28.92 MB/s -30%
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	26.6 MB/s -35%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	17.02 MB/s -59%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø36.8 (28.1-47.2)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.8 (29.7-46.3)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.7 (21.9-44.3)

Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø74.8 (41.8-84.4)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78 (60.4-86.2)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø64.6 (36.3-77.6)

软件 -Android 14 和 DRM Widevine L1

Teclast 平板电脑不仅可以运行最新版本的Android (Android 14)，而且没有预装第三方赞助的应用程序，这意味着你可以非常有效地利用可用存储空间。T50HD 支持 DRM Widevine L1，因此你可以从 Netflix 等流媒体平台流式传输高分辨率内容。

在 5 月初进行测试时，最新的Android 安全补丁是从 2 月 5 日开始的，因此已经不是完全最新的了。即使直接询问 Teclast，制造商也无法向我们透露 T50HD 的更新时间和频率。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 5 性能稳定，GPS 性能较差

Teclast T50HD 支持最快的无线局域网标准 WiFi 5，还可以通过蓝牙 5.0 进行短距离通信。它不支持 NFC。

当连接到华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器时，T50HD 提供了良好而稳定的 WLAN 传输速率。其峰值为 358 MBit/s，几乎达到了标准的最大数据吞吐量。在对比设备中，只有电信 T 平板电脑速度稍快。

您可以在 T50HD 上使用 4G 上网。它支持 4G 频段 1、3、5、7、8、20、34、38、39、40 和 41，确保在进行测试的欧盟境内接收良好。

Networking
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	320 (min: 196) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	358 (min: 340) MBit/s ∼96%
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	44.1 (min: 27) MBit/s ∼12%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	47.8 (min: 32) MBit/s ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	340 (min: 172) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	369 (min: 356) MBit/s ∼99%
Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	302 (min: 240) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	353 (min: 331) MBit/s ∼95%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	371 (min: 365) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	372 (min: 358) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	307 (min: 284) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	369 (min: 179) MBit/s ∼99%

Teclast T50 HD Unisoc T7200, ARM Mali-G57 MP1; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø319 (196-336)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø333 (172-350)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø307 (284-322)

Teclast T50 HD Unisoc T7200, ARM Mali-G57 MP1; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø358 (340-367)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø369 (356-387)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø363 (179-379)

T50HD 通过卫星导航服务 GPS、Glonass、Galileo 和 Beidou（均为单波段模式）确定位置。不过，它的定位速度并不快，在室内我们无法获得结果。在室外，该平板电脑能以 7 米的精度定位我们。

我们的实际测试表明，该平板电脑仅部分适用于导航目的。与我们拿来比较的健身智能手表 Garmin Venu 2 相比，T50HD 记录的 4 公里长的路线非常不精确。它在建筑物间抄近路，有时会跳过整条街道，或者认为我们是在河里，而不是在跨河大桥上。

相机 - 仅有快照质量

T50HD 的自拍摄像头分辨率为 8 百万像素，拍摄的照片并不特别明亮或清晰。即便如此，它的画质仍足以满足视频通话的需要。它的最大分辨率为 720p，每秒 30 帧。

平板电脑的主摄像头分辨率为 1300 万像素，与自拍摄像头一样，配有 LED 闪光灯。用户可以看到两个镜头，但底部的镜头只是用作深度传感器，分辨率为 30 万像素。

在光线条件良好的情况下，主摄像头可以拍摄出可用的照片，但照片质量并不高。照片的动态效果较差，看起来有点贫血，几乎就像在日食期间拍摄的一样。图像细节很少，同质区域被冲淡，图像噪点逐渐渗入图像的暗部。光照条件差时，相机会完全无法拍摄。

主摄像头可以高达 1080p 和每秒 30 帧的速度录制视频。录制视频时的画质与拍照质量相当。反过来，摄像头也能相对快速地适应光线条件的变化。自动对焦功能也相当可靠。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1 Daylight photo 2 Low-light photo

click to load images

Teclast T50HD

Canon EOS 600D

Apple iPhone 15

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

click to load images

Teclast T50HD

Canon EOS 600D

Apple iPhone 15

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

click to load images

Teclast T50HD

Canon EOS 600D

Apple iPhone 15

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

随后，我们仔细观察了主摄像头在可控光线条件下的画质。在最佳照明条件下，主摄像头能准确捕捉色彩，但测试图却显得模糊不清。在 1 勒克斯的残余光照条件下，ColorChecker 色卡和测试图几乎完全消失在黑暗中。

配件和保修 - Teclast T50HD 配有 10 瓦电源

Teclast T50HD 随附一个 10 瓦电源（5V/2A）、一条 USB 线缆（Type-A 到 Type-C）、一个 SIM 卡工具、一本简短的说明书和一张保修卡。制造商还通过其网站为平板电脑提供了一个对开式保护套。

Teclast T50HD 提供 12 个月的保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - 无指纹传感器，但可进行 2D 面部识别

Teclast 平板电脑的触摸屏能对输入做出快速而精确的反应。与同类产品一样，它的刷新率为 60 赫兹。

T50HD 没有配备指纹传感器。不过，你可以通过 2D 面部识别技术对平板电脑进行生物解锁，这种技术在弱光环境下也能很好地工作。锁定设备的其他方法包括模式、PIN 码和密码。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 无 PWM 的明亮 IPS 面板

T50HD 的 11 英寸显示屏分辨率为 1920 x 1200 像素，纵横比为 16:10，像素密度为 207 PPI。在 APL18 测试中（图像明暗区域分布均匀），该屏幕的最大亮度达到 528 cd/m²，这意味着它是对比领域中最亮的设备。

我们没有在 IPS 显示屏上测量到任何 PWM。因此，对屏幕闪烁反应敏感的人可以毫不犹豫地购买这款平板电脑。


431 cd/m²	453 cd/m²	455 cd/m²
433 cd/m²	500 cd/m²	449 cd/m²
453 cd/m²	495 cd/m²	444 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 500 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 457 cd/m² Minimum: 25 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 500 cd/m²
Contrast: 1515:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.64 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.016

	Teclast T50 HD IPS, 1920x1200, 11"	Blackview Tab 80 LCD, 1280x800, 10.1"	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11"	Teclast M50 IPS, 1280x800, 10.1"	Telekom T Tablet TFT-LCD, 2000x1200, 10.4"	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11"
Screen		-8%	-21%	-44%	-52%	15%
Brightness middle	500	425 -15%	493 -1%	371 -26%	529 6%	473 -5%
Brightness	457	423 -7%	460 1%	369 -19%	486 6%	449 -2%
Brightness Distribution	86	83 -3%	90 5%	87 1%	87 1%	85 -1%
Black Level *	0.33	0.4 -21%	0.35 -6%	0.45 -36%	0.56 -70%	0.28 15%
Contrast	1515	1063 -30%	1409 -7%	824 -46%	945 -38%	1689 11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.64	5.11 -10%	6 -29%	7.46 -61%	9.6 -107%	3 35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.02	9.8 -9%	11.7 -30%	16.5 -83%	14.4 -60%	6 33%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.1	2.8 32%	8.2 -100%	7.4 -80%	10.5 -156%	2.7 34%
Gamma	2.016 ^109%	2.183 ^101%	2.21 ^100%	2.055 ^107%	2.17 ^101%	2.27 ^97%
CCT	7316 ^89%	7136 ^91%	9131 ^71%	8423 ^77%	10482 ^62%	6589 ^99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

IPS 显示屏拥有对比度丰富的显示效果（1515:1），在其他图像参数的测试中也表现出色。它的效果并不完全理想，但对于这个价位的产品来说还是可以接受的。这也是因为它的整体色彩偏差较小，在日常使用中应该不会很明显。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
18.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9.1 ms rise
18.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 9.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19.1 ms rise
36.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

即使在明亮的日子里，可视角度稳定的 IPS 面板上的内容依然清晰可辨。相比之下，阳光直射会给设备带来一些问题，因为强烈的反光经常会阻碍你的视线。另一方面，在阴暗的地方，显示屏的阅读也相当舒适。

性能 - 配备 Unisoc T606 的 Teclast T50HD

产品 Unisoc T606Teclast T50HD 内部的 Unisoc T606 是一位熟悉的朋友，也用于该制造商生产的许多其他平板电脑。这颗于 2019 年底推出的八核 SoC 并不是什么性能奇迹，因为在日常使用中时不时会出现卡顿或小延迟。另一方面，Teclast 平板电脑在上网和观看视频时速度足够快。如果图形计算要求不高，游戏也能流畅运行。

正如其合成基准测试结果所显示的，Teclast T50HD 可以与同价位的竞争对手相抗衡。其性能与小米红米 Pad SE相似，后者配备了骁龙 680 4G.电信 T 平板电脑电信 T 平板电脑(联发科 Dimensity 700）和三星Galaxy Tab A9+(骁龙 695 5G) 则与 T50HD 保持着较为明显的距离。

Geekbench 6.3
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=68, last 2 years)	3518 Points +167%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	1993 Points +51%
Telekom T Tablet	1919 Points +45%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	1439 Points +9%
Teclast M50	1386 Points +5%
Average Unisoc T7200 (1285 - 1482, n=11)	1364 Points +3%
Teclast T50 HD	1319 Points
Blackview Tab 80	1298 Points -2%
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=68, last 2 years)	1093 Points +197%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	919 Points +150%
Telekom T Tablet	711 Points +93%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	413 Points +12%
Teclast M50	380 Points +3%
Blackview Tab 80	377 Points +2%
Average Unisoc T7200 (368 - 380, n=11)	375 Points +2%
Teclast T50 HD	368 Points

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)	707 Points +136%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	693 Points +131%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	384 Points +28%
Blackview Tab 80	309 Points +3%
Teclast M50	309 Points +3%
Average Unisoc T7200 (273 - 313, n=19)	306 Points +2%
Teclast T50 HD	300 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)	2496 Points +105%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	1768 Points +45%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	1684 Points +38%
Teclast M50	1305 Points +7%
Blackview Tab 80	1245 Points +2%
Teclast T50 HD	1217 Points
Average Unisoc T7200 (708 - 1324, n=19)	1206 Points -1%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (164396 - 2716980, n=36, last 2 years)	759506 Points +210%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	422144 Points +72%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	287727 Points +17%
Teclast T50 HD	245367 Points
Average Unisoc T7200 (221540 - 245797, n=6)	237693 Points -3%
Blackview Tab 80	221540 Points -10%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=49, last 2 years)	464403 Points +96%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	354299 Points +50%
Teclast T50 HD	236491 Points
Average Unisoc T7200 (202973 - 238808, n=6)	221439 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	201810 Points -15%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	10550 Points +44%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)	9812 Points +34%
Telekom T Tablet	8329 Points +14%
Teclast M50	7383 Points +1%
Average Unisoc T7200 (6637 - 8303, n=19)	7338 Points 0%
Teclast T50 HD	7321 Points
Blackview Tab 80	7178 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	7068 Points -3%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)	772 Points +113%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	578 Points +60%
Telekom T Tablet	534 Points +48%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	402 Points +11%
Teclast T50 HD	362 Points
Average Unisoc T7200 (339 - 362, n=5)	349 Points -4%
Blackview Tab 80	Points -100%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)	4210 Points +124%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	3596 Points +91%
Telekom T Tablet	2839 Points +51%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	2551 Points +36%
Average Unisoc T7200 (1879 - 1954, n=7)	1913 Points +2%
Blackview Tab 80	1887 Points 0%
Teclast T50 HD	1879 Points
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	7626 Points +90%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)	7279 Points +82%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	5580 Points +39%
Telekom T Tablet	4934 Points +23%
Blackview Tab 80	4335 Points +8%
Average Unisoc T7200 (4009 - 4362, n=7)	4273 Points +7%
Teclast T50 HD	4009 Points
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)	4874 Points +82%
Telekom T Tablet	3923 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	3872 Points +45%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	3120 Points +16%
Average Unisoc T7200 (2675 - 3095, n=7)	2808 Points +5%
Teclast T50 HD	2679 Points
Blackview Tab 80	2675 Points 0%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)	9171 Points +793%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	4337 Points +322%
Telekom T Tablet	2667 Points +160%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	2179 Points +112%
Blackview Tab 80	1076 Points +5%
Teclast T50 HD	1027 Points
Average Unisoc T7200 (989 - 1076, n=7)	1023 Points 0%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	1307 Points +16%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)	1269 Points +12%
Telekom T Tablet	1258 Points +11%
Teclast T50 HD	1129 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	1116 Points -1%
Average Unisoc T7200 (1034 - 1129, n=7)	1098 Points -3%
Blackview Tab 80	1034 Points -8%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=51, last 2 years)	7152 Points +2501%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	429 Points +56%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	348 Points +27%
Teclast T50 HD	275 Points
Average Unisoc T7200 (256 - 280, n=6)	275 Points 0%
Blackview Tab 80	256 Points -7%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)	11329 Points +229%
Telekom T Tablet	9056 Points +163%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	5687 Points +65%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	4150 Points +21%
Teclast T50 HD	3441 Points
Average Unisoc T7200 (2678 - 3748, n=7)	3026 Points -12%
Blackview Tab 80	2678 Points -22%

Legend

Teclast T50 HD Unisoc T7200, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Blackview Tab 80 Unisoc T7200, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Teclast M50 Unisoc T7200, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Telekom T Tablet MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Average Unisoc T7200

Average of class Tablet

产品 Unisoc T606包含 ARM Mali-G57 MP1图形处理器，使 T50HD 在运行应用程序时具有稳定的图形性能。然而，游戏给图形处理器带来了巨大挑战。GFXBench 的 T-Rex 基准测试表明，即使是图形简单的游戏，也无法保证每秒 30 帧的速度，因此也无法保证相当流畅的显示效果。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	361 Points +209%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	326 Points +179%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	123 Points +5%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	117 Points
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	101 Points -14%
Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	89 Points -24%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1206 Points +186%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1171 Points +177%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	574 Points +36%
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	424 Points 0%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	422 Points
Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	421 Points 0%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1216 Points +188%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1173 Points +178%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	589 Points +40%
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	432 Points +2%
Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	426 Points +1%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	422 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3075 Points +214%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2511 Points +156%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1429 Points +46%
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	989 Points +1%
Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	979 Points 0%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	979 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2991 Points +260%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2321 Points +180%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1309 Points +58%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	830 Points
Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	829 Points 0%
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	822 Points -1%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	3516 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3409 Points +29%
Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2659 Points 0%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2647 Points
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2593 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2105 Points -20%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	82 fps +273%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	51 fps +132%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	37 fps +68%
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	34 fps +55%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	93 fps +323%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	61 fps +177%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	41 fps +86%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	21 fps -5%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	45 fps +221%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	34 fps +143%
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	27 fps +93%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	21 fps +50%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	47 fps +213%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	38 fps +153%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	22 fps +47%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps -7%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	33 fps +275%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	23 fps +161%
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	19 fps +116%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps +59%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.8 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	34 fps +282%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	24 fps +170%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps +69%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.9 fps
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.7 fps -2%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps +258%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	12 fps +126%
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	11 fps +108%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	7.5 fps +42%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.3 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps +252%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps +178%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.1 fps +50%
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.7 fps +6%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.4 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps +282%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.3 fps +144%
Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	7.2 fps +112%
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	7 fps +106%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.3 fps +56%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.4 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.2 fps +310%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.2 fps +160%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	3.3 fps +65%
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2.1 fps +5%
Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2 fps 0%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	21 fps +289%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	12 fps +122%
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	11 fps +104%
Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	11 fps +104%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	9 fps +67%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.4 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps +300%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	13 fps +136%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	9.8 fps +78%
Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.5 fps 0%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.5 fps
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.3 fps -4%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.6 fps +309%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2.2 fps +150%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1.4 fps +59%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	0.88 fps
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	0.8 fps -9%
Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	0.8 fps -9%

浏览器基准测试显示的情况略有不同，因为与 Telekom T Tablet 等平板电脑相比，其性能几乎没有差别。电信 T 平板电脑或小米红米 Pad SE.在日常使用中，您可以在 Teclast 平板电脑上快速上网，网站加载速度也很快。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years)	108.7 Points +106%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)	96.598 Points +83%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)	58.17 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	52.9 Points 0%
Teclast T50 HD	52.862 Points
Average Unisoc T7200 (38.1 - 52.9, n=8)	48.6 Points -8%
Blackview Tab 80 (Chrome 120)	47.753 Points -10%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)	107 Points +91%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=68, last 2 years)	104.3 Points +86%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	57 Points +2%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)	56 Points 0%
Teclast T50 HD (Chrome 124.0.6367.83)	56 Points
Average Unisoc T7200 (51 - 56, n=7)	52.6 Points -6%
Blackview Tab 80 (Chrome 120)	51 Points -9%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years)	149.6 Points +74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)	144 Points +67%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	93 Points +8%
Teclast T50 HD (Chrome 124.0.6367.83)	86 Points
Blackview Tab 80 (Chrome 120)	78 Points -9%
Average Unisoc T7200 (70 - 86, n=4)	77.8 Points -10%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years)	115.5 runs/min +122%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)	71.6 runs/min +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	53.5 runs/min +3%
Teclast T50 HD (Chrome 124.0.6367.83)	52.1 runs/min
Average Unisoc T7200 (31.2 - 52.1, n=7)	40.8 runs/min -22%
Blackview Tab 80 (Chrome 120)	36.9 runs/min -29%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)	29301 Points +122%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)	28653 Points +117%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)	21843 Points +65%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 120)	14279 Points +8%
Teclast T50 HD (Chrome 124.0.6367.83)	13211 Points
Teclast M50 (Chrome 122)	12461 Points -6%
Blackview Tab 80 (Chrome 120)	11786 Points -11%
Average Unisoc T7200 (2228 - 13455, n=14)	11332 Points -14%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years)	3789 ms * -28%
Blackview Tab 80 (Chrome 120)	3176.1 ms * -7%
Average Unisoc T7200 (2904 - 3187, n=7)	3045 ms * -3%
Teclast T50 HD (Chrome 124.0.6367.83)	2965.7 ms *
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	2650.1 ms * +11%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)	2194.9 ms * +26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)	1352.9 ms * +54%

* ... smaller is better

UFS 存储器帮助 Teclast T50HD 实现了非常高的传输速率。这在日常使用中非常明显，即使是大型应用程序也能快速加载。

	Teclast T50 HD	Blackview Tab 80	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	Teclast M50	Telekom T Tablet	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-72%	-43%	-73%	-74%	-59%	-8%	-12%
Sequential Read 256KB	970.01	266.71 -73%	485.96 -50%	269.9 -72%	287.1 -70%	297.47 -69%	887 ?(482 - 1009, n=32) -9%	1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years) 8%
Sequential Write 256KB	831.36	235.98 -72%	476.37 -43%	196 -76%	188.3 -77%	228.97 -72%	694 ?(369 - 913, n=32) -17%	684 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years) -18%
Random Read 4KB	218.22	65.11 -70%	130.67 -40%	69.6 -68%	52.8 -76%	102.41 -53%	228 ?(99.7 - 291, n=32) 4%	189.2 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years) -13%
Random Write 4KB	257.68	70.74 -73%	162.9 -37%	62.3 -76%	66.55 -74%	146.92 -43%	238 ?(99.2 - 319, n=32) -8%	189.5 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years) -26%

游戏 - 运行很少流畅

我们使用Gamebench来测试平板电脑运行游戏的性能。遗憾的是，Teclast T50HD 拒绝向我们的测试程序提供数据，因此我们无法提供任何帧速率。

尽管如此，没有准确的 FPS 数据也能很好地评估 T50HD 的游戏性能。在最低图形设置下可以玩《源氏冲击》和《PUBG Mobile》等要求较高的游戏，但运行起来并不十分流畅。低性能 ARM Mali-G57 MP1图形芯片只能在图形简单的游戏中运行，如《死亡扳机 2》或《地铁冲浪者》。

No graph data

排放物 - 带立体声的酷平板电脑

温度

在运行过程中，T50HD 保持低温。在使用 Burnout 基准进行 1 小时的压力测试后，我们测得的最高表面温度为 89.6 华氏度（32 摄氏度）。3DMark 的 Wild Life 压力测试表明，即使在连续负载的情况下，平板电脑实际上也能始终发挥其全部性能。

Max. Load

Idle


26.3 °C	32 °C	26.9 °C
26.5 °C	28 °C	26.3 °C
26.2 °C	26 °C	25.8 °C

Maximum: 32 °C
Average: 27.1 °C


27.7 °C	31.5 °C	26.4 °C
27.4 °C	29 °C	27.7 °C
27 °C	27.1 °C	27.1 °C

Maximum: 31.5 °C
Average: 27.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.9 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.7 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.54 (2.53-2.55)

Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.54 (2.52-2.56)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.26 (7.23-7.27)

Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.56 (2.54-2.57)

Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.09 (7.07-7.1)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.5 (3.49-3.5)

Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.619 (0.55-0.676)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.16 (2.14-2.16)

Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.621 (0.58-0.68)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.726 (0.72-0.741)

Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.02 (6.99-7.03)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.52 (3.52-3.53)

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	99 (2.14^min - 2.16^max) %
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	97.3 (0.72^min - 0.741^max) %
Teclast M50	85.3 (0.58^min - 0.68^max) %
Blackview Tab 80	81.3 (0.55^min - 0.676^max) %
Teclast T50 HD	%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	99.6 (3.49^min - 3.5^max) % +1%
Telekom T Tablet	99.6 (7.07^min - 7.1^max) % +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	99.5 (7.23^min - 7.27^max) % 0%
Teclast T50 HD	99.1 (2.53^min - 2.55^max) %
Teclast M50	98.9 (2.54^min - 2.57^max) % 0%
Blackview Tab 80	98.2 (2.52^min - 2.56^max) % -1%
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	99.9 (3.52^min - 3.53^max) %
Telekom T Tablet	99.5 (6.99^min - 7.03^max) %

Legend

Teclast T50 HD Unisoc T7200, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Blackview Tab 80 Unisoc T7200, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Teclast M50 Unisoc T7200, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Telekom T Tablet MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB eMMC Flash

发言人

立体声扬声器位于 Teclast 平板电脑内部，音量高达 80.4 dB(A)，听起来丝毫不失真。它们的音质很好，但缺少低音。而中高音则相对均衡。

外接音频设备可通过 3.5 毫米插孔或蓝牙 5.0 与平板电脑连接。可用的蓝牙编解码器有 SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、LDAC、LC3 和 Opus。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Teclast T50 HD audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 电池续航时间长，但充电速度慢

耗电量

与竞争对手相比，Teclast T50HD 相当节能。在空闲模式下，它只需要 1.8 瓦，而在负载情况下，功耗会增加到适中的 2.8 瓦。

通过随附的电源适配器，8000 毫安时电池的最大充电功率为 10 瓦。使用其他电源装置，例如我们使用的来自 Ugreen 的 65 瓦电源装置，我们无法从平板电脑中获得更高的充电功率。

给平板电脑充电时必须耐心。在我们的测试中，空电池需要 5 小时 5 分钟才能恢复到 100%的电量。因此，在实际操作中，最好是通宵为平板电脑充电。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.6 / 1.8 / 2 Watt
Load	2.8 / 6.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Teclast T50 HD 8000 mAh	Blackview Tab 80 7680 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ 7040 mAh	Telekom T Tablet 7000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8000 mAh
Power Consumption		26%	-112%	-122%	-104%
Idle Minimum *	1.6	0.8 50%	1 37%	1.28 20%	0.63 61%
Idle Average *	1.8	1 44%	4.76 -164%	4.52 -151%	4.25 -136%
Idle Maximum *	2	1.5 25%	4.79 -140%	4.58 -129%	4.34 -117%
Load Average *	2.8	3.2 -14%	9.52 -240%	10.5 -275%	10.24 -266%
Load Maximum *	6.4	4.9 23%	9.92 -55%	11.2 -75%	10.47 -64%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Teclast T50 HD Unisoc T7200: Ø3.86 (1.833-6.32)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G: Ø4.05 (1.974-6.6)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G: Ø3.52 (1.674-7.23)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Teclast T50 HD Unisoc T7200; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.85 (2.59-3.31)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.41 (4.18-4.71)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.97 (2.43-3.19)

Teclast T50 HD Unisoc T7200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.701 (1.618-1.94)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.02 (1.986-2.31)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.74 (1.672-2.5)

运行时间

良好的电池续航能力是 T50HD 的亮点之一。模拟网上冲浪只持续了不到 15 个小时，而连续循环播放高清视频甚至持续了 16 个小时多一点。然而小米红米 Pad SE的 8000 毫安时电池可以获得更长的续航时间。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		29h 12min
WiFi Websurfing		14h 55min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		16h 14min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 21min

	Teclast T50 HD 8000 mAh	Blackview Tab 80 7680 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ 7040 mAh	Teclast M50 6000 mAh	Telekom T Tablet 7000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8000 mAh
Battery Runtime		36%	2%	-17%	-13%	37%
Reader / Idle	1752	2591 48%	2275 30%			4236 142%
H.264	974	871 -11%	800 -18%			997 2%
WiFi v1.3	895	1012 13%	920 3%	742 -17%	775 -13%	1017 14%
Load	261	508 95%	243 -7%			231 -11%

Pros

+ 轻质金属外壳

+ 运行时间长

+ 在同价位产品中显示屏亮度高

+ DRM 宽频 L1

+ 256 GB 存储空间和 microSD 插槽

+ LTE 调制解调器，支持双卡

+ 立体声扬声器

Cons

- 系统性能适中

- GPS 功能弱

- 照相效果差

- 10 瓦充电速度慢

- 无指纹传感器

- 更新交付不明确

对 Teclast T50HD 的评价

Teclast T50HD 是一款不错的入门级平板电脑，它的外观并没有暴露其低廉的价格。它的铝制外壳做工精良，重量仅为 500 克，对于 11 英寸平板电脑来说是超级轻便的。

T50HD 的 1920 x 1200 像素 IPS 显示屏也为其加分不少，它拥有出色的对比度和相对均衡的色彩描绘。其他亮点还包括良好的运行时间和 256 GB 的大容量存储空间，在我们的测试中也实现了快速运行。此外，这款平板电脑还支持双 SIM 卡的 4G，拥有立体声扬声器和 DRM Widevine L1 认证。

Teclast T50HD 是一款物美价廉的多媒体平板电脑，拥有明亮的 IPS 显示屏、大容量存储空间、较长的运行时间和 4G 移动网络。

由于其过时的 Unisoc T606，T50HD 只能提供有限的系统性能。虽然它足以满足上网和观看视频的需求，但却无法满足更多需求。即便如此，该系统芯片仍能流畅运行简单的游戏，但 Teclast 平板电脑绝不是游戏机。该设备的一个弱点是更新交付不明确。虽然Android 14 可以在 T50HD 上运行，但只有制造商才知道它能收到多少更新--但它对我们保密。

Teclast T50HD 的替代产品包括三星Galaxy Tab A9+、电信 T 平板电脑和小米红米平板 SE.

价格和供应情况

在撰写本文时，Teclast T50HD 只能在极少数网上商店买到。目前，您可以在阿里速卖通（）上以 111.04 美元的价格找到它。.您也可以通过亚马逊店面查看 Teclast 现有的平板电脑。

Teclast T50 HD - 05/10/2024 v7 ^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

83 / 98 → 84%

Keyboard

73 / 80 → 91%

Pointing Device

89%

Connectivity

42 / 70 → 60%

Weight

83 / 40-88 → 90%

Battery

90%

Display

81%

Games Performance

10 / 78 → 13%

Application Performance

66 / 92 → 72%

Temperature

96%

Noise

100%

Audio

66 / 91 → 72%

Camera

52 / 85 → 61%

Average

72%

82%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 339 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 459232 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Teclast T50HD 平板电脑评测--经济实惠的 11 英寸全能型平板电脑Android 14

Manuel Masiero, 2024-05-14 (Update: 2024-08-15)