小米红米 Pad SE 平板电脑评测--不是改进，而是降级？

Name: Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Brand: Xiaomi

节省了资金。

铝合金一体成型机身、四个杜比全景声认证扬声器和 90Hz 显示屏，所有这些都集中在一台售价 220 美元的平板电脑中。小米的红米 Pad SE 是一款价格诱人的令人兴奋的产品。我们的评测将确定该设备是否有任何弱点。

Benedikt Winkel, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 01/13/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Tablet Touchscreen

小米的红米设备通常以物美价廉著称。从纸面上看，红米 Pad SE 非常符合这一理念。SE 是 2022 年首款红米平板电脑--红米 Pad 的继任者。红米平板电脑.

我们喜欢它前身的铝制外壳、90 赫兹的显示屏和良好的电池续航能力。不过，它的操作并不总是很流畅，功能也不齐全--我们缺少卫星导航和指纹传感器等等。

制造商提供三种颜色的平板电脑：薰衣草紫、石墨灰和薄荷绿。此外，红米 Pad SE 还有三种配置。基本机型配备 4 GB 内存和 128 GB 存储空间，售价 220 美元。多花 30 美元，你就能买到配备 8 GB 内存的设备。这款平板电脑配备 8 GB 内存和 256 GB 存储空间，售价 280 美元。我们的测试样品为淡紫色，采用的是基本配置。

Test device courtesy of cyberport.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (Redmi Pad Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) / Silver (Cortex-A53)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 610

Memory

4 GB

, LPDDR4X

Display

11.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 206 PPI, Capacitive, TFT-LCD, glossy: yes, HDR, 90 Hz

Storage

128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB

, 106.5 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, proximity, OTG

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.36 x 255.53 x 167.08

Battery

8000 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0, 1.12 µm)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (f/2.2, 1.12 µm)

Additional features

Speakers: 4, Keyboard: OnScreen, Keyboard Light: yes, USB-Charger, SIM-Needle, MIUI 14.0.4, 24 Months Warranty, DRM Widevine L1; Camera2 API Level 3; SAR-Case: 0.974 W/kg, fanless

Weight

481 g, Power Supply: 67 g

Price

199.9 Euro

Amazon

$192.46

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
83.5 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2024	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE SD 680, Adreno 610	481 g	7.36 mm	11.00"	1920x1200
84.6 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2022	Xiaomi Redmi Pad Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2	445 g	7.05 mm	10.61"	2000x1200
81.2 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2023	Huawei MatePad SE SD 680, Adreno 610	440 g	7.9 mm	10.40"	2000x1200
81 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2022	Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 T618, Mali-G52 MP2	508 g	6.9 mm	10.50"	1920x1200
80 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2023	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 T610, Mali-G52 MP2	460 g	8.5 mm	10.10"	1920x1200

外壳 - 红米 Pad SE，铝制机身

小米红米 Pad SE 采用铝合金一体成型外壳。这款平板电脑手感优质，机身纤薄，握持感良好。我们测试样品的结构完美无瑕。设备几乎可以扭动，扭动时也不会发出任何声音。电源键和音量摇杆有一点松动，按压点可以更清晰一些。

四个扬声器位于平板电脑的短边。值得庆幸的是，红米 Pad SE 的底部有一个音频接口，而我们在其前代产品Redmi Pad 上却没有这个接口。它的边框可能不像三星Galaxy Tab S9 等高端平板电脑那样纤薄，但也绝不厚。至少，它的边框很平整。

摄像头略微突出于机身背面。如果把平板电脑水平放在桌子上，在打字时会有轻微晃动。如果将平板电脑直立放置，输入时设备不会晃动。

尺寸比较

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Xiaomi Redmi Pad Huawei MatePad SE Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 DIN A5 ❌

连接性 - 红米 Pad SE 支持 microSD 和音频插孔

虽然该设备的外观与前代产品相同，但内部却发生了一些变化。一方面，制造商放弃了 3 GB 内存和 64 GB 存储空间的版本，但另一方面，小米红米 Pad SE 采用了骁龙处理器，而不是联发科处理器。

它的存储空间仍可通过 microSD 卡扩展。遗憾的是，它的 USB 端口还是一样，即 USB 2.0。不过，它仍然支持 exFAT 和 NTFS 外置存储介质。在使用三星 980 Pro 外置硬盘进行的复制测试中，我们测得的最大传输速率为 28.68 MB/s。这意味着它的存储速度与 microSD 卡处于同一水平。

小米没有提供可接收 LTE 信号的平板电脑版本，也不支持 NFC 或红外触发器。与的前身一样，，红米 Pad SE 没有 GNSS 模块，这意味着它无法建立卫星连接。

microSD 读卡器 - 最大 1TB

红米 Pad SE 的存储空间可以借助 microSD 卡进行扩展--平板电脑支持容量高达 1 TB 的卡。该平板电脑还支持 exFAT 格式。结合 AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60 参考卡，我们测得的传输速率约为 30 MB/s。

这意味着这款平板电脑可以与同类设备竞争，领先于红米平板电脑.只有三星Galaxy Tab A8的数据传输速率更快。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	49.18 MB/s +70%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	28.92 MB/s
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	21.3 MB/s -26%
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	19.7 MB/s -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	9.48 MB/s -67%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.7 (21.9-44.3)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32.7 (13.3-40.3)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø64.6 (36.3-77.6)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.6 (37.9-86.8)

软件 - 小米承诺更新至 2026 年

红米 Pad SE 出厂时已安装Android 13。此外，制造商还使用了自己的用户界面，即 MIUI 14 版本。在测试时，最新的Android 安全补丁是从 2023 年 11 月开始的。根据小米公司的说法，该平板电脑将在 2026 年 9 月之前接收安全更新。这些更新应该每 90 天提供一次，红米 Pad SE 还将获得一次重大更新，即Android 14。

与Android 相比，小米的界面色彩更丰富一些，而且没有应用程序抽屉。另一方面，该软件具有更多的自定义选项。出厂时，21.5 GB 的存储空间已在使用中。值得庆幸的是，平板电脑上安装的臃肿软件并不多。除了几个谷歌和小米的应用程序外，只预装了 Netflix 和 WPS Office。

该软件允许你将应用程序显示为浮动窗口。它们的大小可以改变，并可在屏幕上移动。某些应用程序可以水平相邻显示，但支持此功能的应用程序并不多。此外，小米还提供了用于视频通话的会议工具。显然，它可以让你在全屏模式下更改功能，例如字幕转录。

通信 - 配备 Wi-Fi 5 的红米 Pad SE

与红米 Pad 一样，小米在红米 Pad SE 的无线局域网硬件方面继续节省开支：这款平板电脑仅支持 Wi-Fi 5。不过，它的传输速率处于同类产品的平均水平。需要指出的是，它的前代产品接收数据的速度似乎要快得多。

结合我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000，该平板电脑的连接速度很快。该设备在接收数据时出现了一些波动。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	367 (358^min - 370^max) MBit/s +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	325 (163^min - 328^max) MBit/s +6%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	319 (310^min - 325^max) MBit/s +4%
Huawei MatePad SE	310 (284^min - 330^max) MBit/s +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	307 (284^min - 322^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	369 (179^min - 379^max) MBit/s 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	369 (179^min - 379^max) MBit/s
Huawei MatePad SE	365 (352^min - 379^max) MBit/s -1%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	351 (333^min - 366^max) MBit/s -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	349 (178^min - 357^max) MBit/s -5%

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø307 (284-322)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø319 (163-328)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø363 (179-379)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø343 (178-357)

摄像头--红米 Pad SE 在细节方面吝于表达

照片不是红米 Pad SE 的强项。背面的摄像头分辨率最多只有 800 万像素。尽管打着 "超级相机 "的招牌，但该镜头似乎只适合在光线条件良好的情况下拍摄快照或扫描文件。

照片缺少细节，很多部分看起来模糊不清。在光线不足的情况下，照片也无法使用。你也不应该依赖数码变焦，因为照片质量会迅速下降。

我们更喜欢 500 万像素的自拍摄像头。自拍效果很好，很清晰--至少近景是这样。另一方面，背景细节丢失较多。摄像头不提供人像模式。如果快速移动平板电脑，图像预览有时会出现一些伪影。

使用这两个摄像头可录制最高 1080p 和 30fps 的视频。录制的音质很好。不过，由于缺少图像稳定功能，视频很快就会变得摇摆不定。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Rabbit Lake 5x Zoom Low light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在光线条件良好的情况下，红米 Pad SE 的摄像头色彩描绘还不错。深色通常被描绘得更浅一些。在受控弱光条件下（1 勒克斯），红米 Pad SE 的摄像头无法描绘任何内容。

ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE: 8.06 ∆E min: 2.89 - max: 14.25 ∆E

配件和保修 - 红米 Pad SE 附带一个电源供应器

小米目前的红米 Pad SE 随附一个充电器。虽然它的功率相当弱（10 瓦），但至少配备了一条合适的 USB 线（USB-A 至 USB-C）。配送范围还包括一本简短的说明书、保修信息和一根打开 microSD 插槽的针。

在美国，小米设备提供标准的 12 个月保修服务。制造商不提供延长保修期的选项。不过，制造商提供了与平板电脑配套的可选保护套。

输入设备和操作 - 红米 Pad SE 上没有指纹传感器

红米 Pad SE 采用了谷歌的 GBoard 键盘。这样，无论在纵向模式还是横向模式下，输入都不会出错。显示屏漂亮而流畅，最多可同时可靠识别十个输入--直达边角。

有点恼人的是，显示屏要过一会儿才能自动转向。有时，你会在它做出反应的时间内将设备转回原位，而此时，又会触发另一次延迟旋转。

小米没有在红米 Pad SE 上安装指纹传感器。反过来，你可以通过 2D 面部识别来解锁设备。可以保存两张人脸，而且可以自动跳过锁屏。面部识别在纵向和横向模式下都能很好地工作。在光线充足的条件下，通过摄像头可以快速解锁设备。但在光线不足的情况下，则需要输入密码或代码。红米 Pad SE 没有振动马达。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 小米在平板电脑上安装了一块明亮的面板

红米 Pad SE 的显示效果不错。制造商在该设备上安装了一块 11 英寸 TFT 液晶面板，最大刷新率为 90 Hz。它的刷新率可以固定在 60 或 90 Hz，也可以由软件自动决定。根据 DRM Info 的说法，该面板不只显示这两个值，还有 30、48 和 50 Hz 三种级别。

在对比领域，红米 Pad SE 拥有最高的测量亮度，即 473 cd/m³。虽然亮度并不完全均匀，但在日常使用中你不会注意到这一点。平板电脑的自动亮度调节功能比较麻烦。很多时候，它的工作速度相当慢，而且总是选择很低的亮度，需要你手动调节。

我们很高兴地告诉大家，在测试过程中我们没有发现任何屏幕闪烁的现象。


471 cd/m²	463 cd/m²	404 cd/m²
463 cd/m²	473 cd/m²	418 cd/m²
471 cd/m²	449 cd/m²	432 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 473 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 449.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.25 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 473 cd/m²
Contrast: 1689:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27

	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11"	Xiaomi Redmi Pad IPS, 2000x1200, 10.6"	Huawei MatePad SE IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4"	Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.5"	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"
Screen		-4%	-13%	-78%	-58%
Brightness middle	473	418 -12%	398 -16%	368 -22%	343 -27%
Brightness	449	402 -10%	368 -18%	346 -23%	332 -26%
Brightness Distribution	85	90 6%	87 2%	91 7%	94 11%
Black Level *	0.28	0.28 -0%	0.46 -64%	0.61 -118%	0.31 -11%
Contrast	1689	1493 -12%	865 -49%	603 -64%	1106 -35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3	2.3 23%	2.17 28%	6.9 -130%	5.9 -97%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6	5.4 10%	4.32 28%	11.4 -90%	11.2 -87%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.7	3.7 -37%	3.1 -15%	7.7 -185%	7.9 -193%
Gamma	2.27 ^97%	2.21 ^100%	2.214 ^99%	2.16 ^102%	2.184 ^101%
CCT	6589 ^99%	6595 ^99%	7245 ^90%	8547 ^76%	9198 ^71%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

总的来说，Redmi 面板的显示效果不错。其黑色值和高对比度尤其令人印象深刻。另一方面，它的色彩表现还可以做得更好一些。蓝色的饱和度太高，蓝色和橙色的色调与目标值有很大偏差。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
26.38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11.47 ms rise
26.38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14.91 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47.92 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22.26 ms rise
47.92 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 25.66 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

红米 Pad SE 的亮度足以在室外使用。在阳光直射下，你可能会注意到一些恼人的反光。而在阴暗处，内容仍然清晰可辨。

红米 Pad SE 的可视角度很好。即使从非常平的角度观看，内容也清晰可辨。从侧面观看时，色彩也不会出现偏差。

性能 - 与红米 Pad 毫无悬念

与前代产品相比，小米选择了不同的处理器。不过，在基准测试中，老款 Redmi Pad搭载的联发科 Helio G99的红米 Pad SE 明显胜出。高通骁龙 680.新款红米 Pad SE 不得不在每一项基准测试中向前辈认输。

与此同时，红米 Pad SE 的性能也还不错。它能够跟上其他对比设备的步伐。不过，在日常使用中，你还是会遇到零星的掉帧和打开应用程序时的一些等待时间。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)	707 Points +84%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	558 Points +45%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	384 Points
Huawei MatePad SE	377 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (323 - 386, n=15)	374 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	365 Points -5%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	346 Points -10%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)	2494 Points +48%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	1889 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	1684 Points
Huawei MatePad SE	1630 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1287 - 1738, n=15)	1585 Points -6%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1267 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	1229 Points -27%

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=70, last 2 years)	1111 Points +169%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (413 - 436, n=5)	422 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	413 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=70, last 2 years)	3544 Points +146%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	1439 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (865 - 1450, n=5)	1218 Points -15%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=48, last 2 years)	469872 Points +133%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	316212 Points +57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (201810 - 274001, n=6)	229317 Points +14%
Huawei MatePad SE	201897 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	201810 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	201310 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	199786 Points -1%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)	9847 Points +39%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	9475 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	7447 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	7068 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (4535 - 8730, n=15)	6633 Points -6%
Huawei MatePad SE	5432 Points -23%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)	773 Points +92%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	575 Points +43%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	402 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (325 - 413, n=8)	374 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	361 Points -10%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	356 Points -11%
Huawei MatePad SE	335 Points -17%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)	4205 Points +65%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	2988 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (2444 - 2738, n=8)	2581 Points +1%
Huawei MatePad SE	2580 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	2551 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	2283 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	1839 Points -28%
System
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)	7265 Points +30%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	6509 Points +17%
Huawei MatePad SE	5760 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (5521 - 5852, n=8)	5716 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	5580 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	4777 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	4729 Points -15%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)	4862 Points +56%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	3550 Points +14%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	3412 Points +9%
Huawei MatePad SE	3381 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (2742 - 3824, n=8)	3376 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	3120 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	970 Points -69%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)	9168 Points +321%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	2875 Points +32%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	2179 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1994 - 2183, n=8)	2134 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	2001 Points -8%
Huawei MatePad SE	1994 Points -8%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1497 Points -31%
Web
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)	1269 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	1246 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	1201 Points +8%
Huawei MatePad SE	1141 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	1116 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1114 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (917 - 1199, n=8)	1077 Points -3%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=50, last 2 years)	7290 Points +1995%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	892 Points +156%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	348 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (264 - 348, n=3)	308 Points -11%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	302 Points -13%
Huawei MatePad SE	264 Points -24%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)	11323 Points +173%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad	9213 Points +122%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (4150 - 4853, n=6)	4405 Points +6%
Huawei MatePad SE	4228 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	4150 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1662 Points -60%

Legend

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Huawei MatePad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 UNISOC T610, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G

Average of class Tablet

小米的骁龙 680还配备了 Adreno 610图形处理器。华为的 MatePad SE 也采用了同样的组合。这款平板电脑的图形处理性能在大多数情况下都能胜任。旧款红米平板电脑的 Mali-G57 MP2在图形处理方面也要强大得多。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	329 Points +172%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	179 Points +48%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	132 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	121 Points
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	120 Points -1%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	343 Points +179%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	184 Points +50%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	135 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	123 Points
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	121 Points -2%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1215 Points +112%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	708 Points +23%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	574 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	522 Points -9%
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	440 Points -23%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1237 Points +110%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	712 Points +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	589 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	524 Points -11%
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	441 Points -25%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2644 Points +85%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1463 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1429 Points
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1330 Points -7%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1146 Points -20%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2442 Points +87%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1309 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1284 Points -2%
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1156 Points -12%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	979 Points -25%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3717 Points +77%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2865 Points +36%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2848 Points +35%
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2809 Points +33%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2105 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	55 fps +49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	39 fps +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	37 fps
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	36 fps -3%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	31 fps -16%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	63 fps +54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	41 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	41 fps
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	40 fps -2%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	32 fps -22%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps +67%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	25 fps +19%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	21 fps
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	20 fps -5%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	19 fps -10%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps +82%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	26 fps +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	22 fps
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	21 fps -5%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	20 fps -9%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23 fps +64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	13 fps -7%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	11 fps -21%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps +67%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	12 fps -20%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps +73%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9.2 fps +23%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	7.5 fps
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7.3 fps -3%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6.4 fps -15%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps +85%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9.7 fps +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.1 fps
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7.9 fps -2%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6.6 fps -19%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.4 fps +58%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	6 fps +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.3 fps
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	5.2 fps -2%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	4.5 fps -15%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.4 fps +64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3.6 fps +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	3.3 fps
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	3.2 fps -3%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2.7 fps -18%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9.9 fps +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	9 fps
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	8.6 fps -4%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7.4 fps -18%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps +43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	10 fps +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	9.8 fps
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	9.3 fps -5%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7.8 fps -20%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2.4 fps +71%
Huawei MatePad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1.4 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1.4 fps
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1.2 fps -14%

浏览器基准测试的结果略有不同。在这些测试中，红米 Pad SE 达到了与红米 Pad 相似的性能水平，在 WEBxprt 和 Speedometer 中甚至处于领先地位。

在日常使用中浏览网页没有任何问题，而且非常流畅。网页加载速度很快，滚动也没有任何延迟。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=70, last 2 years)	111.2 Points +110%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	55.842 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	52.9 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	46.85 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (35.7 - 63.1, n=8)	45.8 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	43.98 Points -17%
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12)	35.746 Points -32%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=69, last 2 years)	106.9 Points +88%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	57 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	56 Points -2%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	53 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (41 - 66, n=5)	51 Points -11%
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12)	41 Points -28%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years)	155.2 Points +67%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	93 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	84 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	75 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (58 - 94, n=7)	71.6 Points -23%
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12)	58 Points -38%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years)	121.9 runs/min +128%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	53.5 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (32.7 - 65.3, n=8)	43.4 runs/min -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	38.1 runs/min -29%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chome 111)	34.43 runs/min -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	33.35 runs/min -38%
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12)	32.7 runs/min -39%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years)	29371 Points +106%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	17557 Points +23%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 120)	14279 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	11952 Points -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (6358 - 15553, n=12)	11775 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	10787 Points -24%
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12)	10370 Points -27%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years)	3734 ms * -41%
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12)	3460.5 ms * -31%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	3075.1 ms * -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)	3060 ms * -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (2461 - 3461, n=7)	3029 ms * -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	2650.1 ms *
Xiaomi Redmi Pad (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)	2443.7 ms * +8%

* ... smaller is better

在存储方面，小米与前代机型相比有所退步。红米 Pad SE 现在不再使用 UFS 2.2，而是使用 eMMC 存储。与三星Galaxy Tab A8或华为 MatePad SE相比，它的传输速率总体不错。而与速度更快的 2022 年的红米 Pad 相比，它的数值要差两到三倍。

	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	Xiaomi Redmi Pad	Huawei MatePad SE	Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	Average 128 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		184%	-40%	-41%	-15%	-25%	141%
Sequential Read 256KB	297.47	976.9 228%	293.6 -1%	255.1 -14%	277.2 -7%	284 ?(106.7 - 511, n=77) -5%	1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years) 251%
Sequential Write 256KB	228.97	883.6 286%	99.5 -57%	101.1 -56%	210.4 -8%	194.6 ?(72.3 - 314, n=77) -15%	686 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years) 200%
Random Read 4KB	102.41	250.82 145%	61.8 -40%	68.3 -33%	105.1 3%	82.7 ?(8.63 - 247, n=77) -19%	189.4 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years) 85%
Random Write 4KB	146.92	257.02 75%	54 -63%	57.5 -61%	78.5 -47%	55.4 ?(3.84 - 159.9, n=77) -62%	189.9 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years) 29%

游戏 - Redmi Pad SE 上的掉帧现象

在运行游戏时，红米 Pad SE 有两副面孔。它的显示屏和扬声器带来了震撼的视听体验。另一方面，SoC 的性能弱点在游戏中表现得尤为明显。虽然它可以运行目前的游戏，如《PUBG Mobile》，但最高分辨率只能达到平衡，帧数只能达到中等。通过我们的合作伙伴GameBench 进行的测量显示显示帧率约为 25fps。

在玩《Asphalt 9》和《Genshin Impact》时，红米 Pad SE 能够在低设置下达到较高的帧率。不过，我们偶尔会发现一些掉帧和延迟现象。

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø30 (26-31)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 4.4.0k: Ø57.4 (28-60)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 4.4.0k: Ø39.8 (10-60)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 4.3.0_19705728_19706476: Ø33.2 (9-43)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 4.3.0_19705728_19706476: Ø14.6 (7-18)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.9.0: Ø29.7 (23-31)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 2.9.0: Ø24.9 (21-26)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.8.0: Ø29.9 (24-32)

排放 - 红米 Pad 保持冷静

温度 - 不受压力测试的影响

在任何情况下，红米 Pad SE 都能保持低温。在压力测试中，我们测得顶部最高温度为 35 摄氏度。在没有负载的情况下，我们实际测得的温度只有 28.9 摄氏度。在日常使用中，平板电脑依然保持舒适，即使打开大量应用程序，也能顺利操作。

Max. Load

Idle


35 °C	32.5 °C	30.7 °C
34.8 °C	33.8 °C	30.8 °C
31.5 °C	29.8 °C	29.4 °C

Maximum: 35 °C
Average: 32 °C


30.3 °C	34.1 °C	32.8 °C
30.5 °C	32.7 °C	31.9 °C
30 °C	31.3 °C	30.7 °C

Maximum: 34.1 °C
Average: 31.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 39.7 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.5 (3.49-3.5)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.26 (4.25-4.27)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.726 (0.72-0.741)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø1.096 (1.091-1.101)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.52 (3.52-3.53)

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	99.2 (1.091^min - 1.101^max) % +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	97.3 (0.72^min - 0.741^max) %
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022	99.6 (4.25^min - 4.27^max) % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	99.6 (3.49^min - 3.5^max) %
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	99.9 (3.52^min - 3.53^max) %

Legend

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

扬声器 - Redmi Pad SE 由四个扬声器发出声音

红米 Pad SE 的音效的确令人印象深刻。虽然这款平板电脑的低音和高频并不明显，但中高音却非常线性。在日常使用中，它的四个扬声器能提供良好的音效。如果需要，红米 Pad SE 可以发出很好的音量，而且听起来不会失真。全音量时，背面会有轻微振动。水平握持时，设备会产生很好的立体声效果，红米 Pad 还通过了杜比全景声认证。

我们还很高兴小米又带来了音频接口。模拟输出的信噪比为 70.07 dBFS，非常稳定。在我们的测试中，它还能顺利连接蓝牙耳机。红米 Pad SE 支持以下编解码器：SBA、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、LDAC、aptX Adaptive Audio 和 aptX TWS+。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 红米 Pad SE 非常节俭

耗电量

当您查看平板电脑的功耗时，您就会特别清楚地看到新处理器的变化。在空闲模式下骁龙 680比联发科 Helio G99 更省钱。联发科 Helio G99的前代产品要节俭得多。在最低负载情况下，红米 Pad 明显优于对比设备。而在负载情况下，情况就有些不同了，因为骁龙的耗电量要比联发科的大得多。不过，在进行直接比较时应谨慎，因为在测量过程中，我们从稳定性测试切换到了 "Burnout "基准测试。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.41 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	0.63 / 4.25 / 4.34 Watt
Load	10.24 / 10.47 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Pad 8000 mAh	Huawei MatePad SE 5100 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 7040 mAh	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 5100 mAh
Power Consumption		9%	-4%	-13%	-14%
Idle Minimum *	0.63	0.93 -48%	1.5 -138%	1.19 -89%	1.9 -202%
Idle Average *	4.25	4.02 5%	2.3 46%	4.63 -9%	2.1 51%
Idle Maximum *	4.34	4.07 6%	2.8 35%	4.68 -8%	2.5 42%
Load Average *	10.24	5.52 46%	6.5 37%	7.27 29%	7.6 26%
Load Maximum *	10.47	6.89 34%	10.7 -2%	9.17 12%	9 14%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G: Ø3.52 (1.674-7.23)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99: Ø3.68 (2.19-5.75)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.97 (2.43-3.19)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.44 (2.64-3.99)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.74 (1.672-2.5)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Mediatek Helio G99; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.06 (2.02-2.37)

运行时间 - 红米 Pad SE 的出色表现

红米 Pad SE 的低功耗体现在其惊人的低负载运行时间上。在我们的阅读测试中，结合 8000 毫安时的电池，这款平板电脑几乎可以持续使用整整三天。

在现实的 WiFi 上网冲浪测试中，红米 Pad SE 在显示屏亮度为 150 cd/m² 的情况下连续使用了 17 个小时。这些数值都非常不错，确保平板电脑每周只需充电一次，具体取决于你的使用情况。如果你对红米 Pad SE 有更高的要求，比如经常玩游戏，那么它的续航时间可能只有接近 4 个小时。

遗憾的是，使用随机提供的充电器充电需要相当长的时间。30 分钟后，平板电脑的电量只能从 0 充到 16%。两小时后，电量显示为 60%。平板电脑完全充满电需要近 4 个小时。不过，它的充电速度还是可以加快的：使用小米公司提供的 33 瓦电源，红米 Pad 只需两个多小时即可充满电。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		70h 36min
WiFi Websurfing		16h 57min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		16h 37min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 51min

	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Pad 8000 mAh	Huawei MatePad SE 5100 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 7040 mAh	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 5100 mAh
Battery Runtime		5%	-22%	-26%	-19%
Reader / Idle	4236	3640 -14%	2009 -53%	1973 -53%	1952 -54%
H.264	997	971 -3%	958 -4%	824 -17%	1002 1%
WiFi v1.3	1017	1057 4%	638 -37%	679 -33%	861 -15%
Load	231	310 34%	249 8%	230 0%	213 -8%

Pros

+ 出色的电池续航能力

+ 出色的扬声器

+ 明亮的 90 赫兹面板

+ 音频插孔连接

+ 轻巧的铝制外壳

Cons

- 无卫星定位服务

- 性能水平低

- 与前代产品相比存在不足

- 无指纹传感器

评语 - 一款优秀的平板电脑，却陷入了前代产品的阴影之中

小米的红米 Pad SE 提供了良好的整体解决方案。这款平板电脑拥有均衡且相对明亮的显示屏、四个出色的扬声器和高品质的金属外壳。它的摄像头足以拍摄文档照片，电池续航能力也不容小觑。

这一切都让红米 Pad SE 在与竞争对手竞争时装备精良。然而，看看这款平板电脑的前身，我们就会发现一些现实问题。这是因为小米在处理器性能和存储空间方面有所欠缺--在这些方面，目前的红米 Pad SE 吃了不少亏。另一方面，该设备拥有更好的运行时间和音频插孔连接。

红米 Pad SE 是一款装备精良的平板电脑。不过，你可以用同样的价格买到去年更快的机型。

目前，红米 Pad SE 的价格为红米 Pad和红米 Pad SE（存储容量相同）的价格完全相同。我们只能建议购买前代机型。联想联想平板 M10 Gen3提供卫星定位服务和 LTE 选项，但其更新供应没有那么好。

价格和供应情况

红米 Pad SE 目前在亚马逊上的售价约为 220 美元。

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE - 01/11/2024 v7 ^(old)
Benedikt Winkel

Chassis

85 / 98 → 87%

Keyboard

69 / 80 → 87%

Pointing Device

89%

Connectivity

41 / 70 → 59%

Weight

83 / 40-88 → 90%

Battery

91%

Display

87%

Games Performance

17 / 78 → 22%

Application Performance

64 / 92 → 70%

Temperature

93%

Noise

100%

Audio

83 / 91 → 91%

Camera

44 / 85 → 52%

Average

68%

84%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.