Notebookcheck Logo
2025 tablet review: Teclast T60 Plus (picture: Marcus Herbrich)

Teclast T60 Plus 评测:售价 130 美元的 12 英寸平板电脑,承诺过高

带 GPS 和 90 Hz 的价格切割机。

Teclast T60 Plus 的显示屏边框比Apple iPad Air 还要纤薄,而Android 平板电脑的设备听起来也非常有趣。大显示屏与立体声、移动通信支持、可选存储扩展甚至音频接口相结合。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Touchscreen Tablet Android

对 Teclast T60 Plus 的评价

对于那些希望购买 11 英寸以上大尺寸平板电脑的用户来说,在低价位产品中还找不到太多的选择。Teclast T60 Plus 的显示屏对角线为 11.97 英寸,不仅性价比高,而且在亮度和对比度方面的质量也不错。

然而,Teclast 为其入门级平板电脑所做的众多承诺在日常操作中却无法始终兑现。面板周围的边框明显比广告图片上显示的要宽,16 GB 的内存也是欺骗性的,其他规格也不明确,例如重量或蓝牙版本等都是误导性的。

特别是考虑到其非常实惠的价格,T60 Plus 的存在还是有充分理由的。除了提供良好的无PMW面板外,这款入门级平板电脑的丰富配置也给人留下了深刻印象。另一方面,那些看重流畅操作的用户最好还是看看价格适中的中端竞争对手,如Honor Pad 9 或红米 Pad Pro 5G。

Pros

+ 大而明亮的面板(在同价位产品中)
+ 良好的设备(音频端口、存储扩展......)
+ 支持定位
+ 高品质金属外壳
+ 支持移动通讯
+ 几乎不发热

Cons

- 芯片组速度慢
- 存储慢
- 糟糕的摄像头
- 无指纹传感器
- 缺乏透明度(可持续性、更新)

价格和供应情况

在本测试进行时,Teclast T60 Plus 在阿里巴巴的售价为~$124亚马逊 179 美元

Amazon Logo
$218.49
TECLAST Tablet 12 inch Android 14 Tablets, T60 with 256GB Storage(Expand to 1TB), Unisoc T616 CPU, 8000mAh +18W PD Fast Charger, 4 Speakers, 5G WiFi+4G LTE, Dual 13MP Camera,GPS
  • $18.79
    Case for TECLAST T60 Plus Tablet 12 inch Android 14 Tablets 2024 Upgraded Version,WUNIAK Premium Leather Business Folio Stand Cover with Hand Strap for Table,Darkblue.
  • $19.99
    Misenya Case for TECLAST T60 12-inch Tablet, Multi-Angle Viewing of Videos or Games Multi-Color Silicone Multi-Purpose Case (Black)

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
73.8%
Teclast T60 Plus
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88 ⎘
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC
Amazon:
1. $218.49
TECLAST Tablet 12 inch Andro...
2. $18.79
Case for TECLAST T60 Plus Ta...
3. $19.99
Misenya Case for TECLAST T60...
List Price: 180€
621 g128 GB eMMC Flash11.97"
2000x1200
195 PPI
IPS LCD
2.
78.1%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 610 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $297.36
Lenovo Tab Plus - 2024 - Pre...
2. $169.98
lenovo ab K11 11" WUXGA Tabl...
3. $284.99
Lenovo Tab M11, 11” Displa...
520 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash11.45"
2000x1200
204 PPI
IPS
3.
76.2%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Huawei MatePad SE 11
HiSilicon Kirin 710A ⎘
ARM Mali-G51 MP4 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.0
Amazon:
1. $31.99
GYSDCAZ Spanish Ñ Keyboard ...
2. $10.96
Kepuch 2 Pack Tempered Glass...
3. $36.99
GYSDCAZ Spanish Ñ Keyboard ...
List Price: 219€
475 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash11.00"
1900x1200
204 PPI
LCD
4.
77.8%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon: $297.36
List Price: 299 Euro
660 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash11.50"
2000x1200
204 PPI
IPS
5.
84.8% v7 (old)
Honor Pad 9
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $12.99
Natbok Case for Honor Pad 9 ...
2. $12.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector C...
3. $19.98
Rosbtib Rotating Case for Ho...
List Price: 350€
555 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash12.10"
2560x1600
249 PPI
IPS LCD
6.
80.7% v7 (old)
Teclast T60
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616) ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP1 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB eMMC
Amazon:
1. $218.49
TECLAST Tablet 12 inch Andro...
2. $179.99
TECLAST Tablet 12 inch Andro...
3. $19.99
TECLAST T60 Case, Tablet Cas...
List Price: 299€
570 g256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash11.97"
2000x1200
195 PPI
IPS

Teclast T60 Plus 是一款入门级平板电脑,以其极具吸引力的性价比脱颖而出。尽管价格非常实惠,但 T60 Plus 的目标是以极具吸引力的质量取胜,尤其是它的 12 英寸(准确地说应该是 11.97 英寸)显示屏。正如 Teclast T60一样,节省成本的措施在芯片组的选择上也非常明显。我们在测试中发现,薄弱的 联发科处理器是否仍能让这款来自中国制造商的 12 英寸平板电脑以令人满意的方式完成日常任务。

Teclast T60 Plus 的规格

Teclast T60 Plus (T Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G88 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
6 GB 
Display
11.97 inch 5:3, 2000 x 1200 pixel 195 PPI, Capacitve touchscreen, IPS LCD, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 104 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Hall, proximity , OTG, Miracast, UKW radio
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G: B2/3/5/8; 3G: B1/2/5/19; 4G: B1/2/3/5/7/8/20/38/39/40/41, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 282 x 178
Battery
8000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.8, AF, LED) camera2 API: limited
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (f/2.8, FF)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Charger, USB cable, info material, 24 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, fanless
Weight
621 g, Power Supply: 45 g
Price
180 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

案例 - 边框纤薄的入门级平板电脑

Teclast T60 Plus 只有水蓝色(照片:Teclast)
Teclast T60 Plus 只有水蓝色(照片:Teclast)

T60 Plus 的背面由铝合金 CNC 铣削而成,表面经过喷砂处理,只能在非常有限的范围内留下指纹。尽管价格很低,但 8.2 毫米的纤薄机身还是显示出了一定的品质。另一方面,边框由塑料制成,手感很薄,很容易压入。

按压边缘时,显示屏的液晶会出现明显的变形,这也让这款 12 英寸平板电脑的实惠价格变得显而易见。Teclast 没有告诉用户前面使用的是哪种玻璃。顶部边缘的塑料条颜色稍深,应该是为了更好地接收平板电脑的天线信号,这也显示了其低廉的价格。

整体做工处于不错的水平。T60 Plus 的重量为 612 克,尽管采用了 12 英寸的大显示屏,但握持起来还是很舒适的--尽管制造商在某些地方奇怪地宣传其平板电脑的重量仅为 550 克。在产品图片上也能看到同样的差异,非常纤薄的边框在实际使用中却明显更大。不过,Teclast 平板电脑的屏占比超过 81%,给人的感觉还是比 iPad 11 Air 2024 更现代。 Apple iPad 11 Air 2024例如

2025 平板电脑评测:Teclast T60 Plus(图片:Marcus Herbrich)
2025 平板电脑评测:Teclast T60 Plus(图片:Marcus Herbrich)
2025 平板电脑评测:Teclast T60 Plus(图片:Marcus Herbrich)
2025 平板电脑评测:Teclast T60 Plus(图片:Marcus Herbrich)
2025 平板电脑评测:Teclast T60 Plus(图片:Marcus Herbrich)

尺寸比较

282 mm 178 mm 8 mm 621 g279 mm 174 mm 7.7 mm 570 g278.27 mm 180.11 mm 6.96 mm 555 g268.3 mm 174.25 mm 13.58 mm 660 g268.7 mm 168.96 mm 7.15 mm 520 g252.3 mm 163.8 mm 6 mm 475 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

设备 - Teclast T60 Plus,带 3.5 毫米音频端口

这款入门级平板电脑的 "Plus "标签与普通的 T60相比,入门级平板电脑的 "Plus "标签有点误导消费者,因为它提供 256 GB 存储空间和 8 GB 内存。虽然考虑到 Teclast 平板电脑的价格,128 GB eMMC 存储空间和 6 GB 工作内存已经足够,但我们还是期望 Plus 版本能有更好的配置。该制造商宣传其平板电脑的内存更大(16GB),但这只能通过在数据存储上使用外部文件来实现,在我们看来这也是一种欺骗。

除此之外,T60 Plus 还拥有立体声扬声器系统、FM 收音机、Miracast 支持、3.5 毫米音频接口以及包括 exFAT 支持在内的最大 1 TB microSD 卡支持等优点。但缓慢的 USB-2.0 连接只能实现缓慢的数据传输,而且无法将图像信号传输到外部显示器。至少,USB Type-C 连接支持 OTG,可以连接外部外围设备。

2025 平板电脑评测:Teclast T60 Plus(图片:Marcus Herbrich)
箱子右侧
2025 平板电脑评测:Teclast T60 Plus(图片:Marcus Herbrich)
顶部(按键)
2025 平板电脑评测:Teclast T60 Plus(图片:Marcus Herbrich)
底部(扬声器)
2025 平板电脑评测:Teclast T60 Plus(图片:Marcus Herbrich)
左侧(USB 端口、卡槽、3.5 毫米音频接口)

microSD 读卡器

与我们的天使鸟 V60 参考卡配合使用,T60 Plus 可提供令人满意的复制速度,尽管速度并不快,但也达到了同类机型的水平。 同类型号.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird V60)
39.7 MB/s +21%
Average of class Tablet
  (7.61 - 101.6, n=59, last 2 years)
34.8 MB/s +6%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (Angelbird V60)
34.1 MB/s +4%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88 (Angelbird V60)
32.9 MB/s
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616) (Angelbird V60)
29.8 MB/s -9%

软件 - 配备Android 14 的平板电脑

T60 Plus 的操作系统基于谷歌Android 第 14 版,尽管在本次测试时,该系统已经打上了 2024 年 7 月的安全补丁。制造商在上面覆盖了自己的用户界面,但几乎没有任何视觉变化。没有臃肿的软件,也没有广告应用程序。此外还包含 Widevine DRM Level L1,可以播放视频流服务中的高分辨率视频内容。

Teclast 没有说明任何更新政策。在其网站上,制造商提到了Android 15,这表明计划升级到当前版本。但安全更新的时间仍然完全未知。

2025 平板电脑评测:Teclast T60 Plus
2025 平板电脑评测:Teclast T60 Plus

可持续性

Teclast 用大量塑料将平板电脑及其配件包裹起来,但却没有关于 T60 Plus 可持续性的信息。我们无法找到任何关于平板电脑生产和使用过程中二氧化碳消耗量的分析。我们对维修手册或用户自行维修所需的替换零件的搜索也同样不成功。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 GPS 的经济型平板电脑

Teclast 平板电脑通过蓝牙 5 和 WiFi 5 进行无线通信。T60 Plus 与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器配合使用时,传输速率最高可达 370 Mbit/s。不过,我们在接收时只能测得约 260 Mbit/s,即使在这个价位也能做得更好。

如果你愿意,还可以使用这款 12 英寸平板电脑拨打电话,包括双 SIM 卡选项。虽然 T60 Plus 配备了 LTE 调制解调器,但支持的 4G 频率非常有限。该平板电脑只能使用 6 个 LTE 频段,因此德语国家以外的用户应检查该平板电脑是否能在本国使用。但即使是在欧洲的完整覆盖范围内,也缺少 28 和 32 频段。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Tablet
  (10.5 - 1710, n=82, last 2 years)
530 MBit/s +102%
Honor Pad 9
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
366 (184min - 389max) MBit/s +39%
Teclast T60
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
360 (341min - 370max) MBit/s +37%
Lenovo Tab Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
354 (289min - 365max) MBit/s +35%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (10.5 - 718, n=190)
350 MBit/s +33%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
315 (223min - 362max) MBit/s +20%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
279 (228min - 295max) MBit/s +6%
Teclast T60 Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
263 (212min - 276max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Tablet
  (20.1 - 1705, n=82, last 2 years)
513 MBit/s +39%
Lenovo Tab Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
372 (362min - 397max) MBit/s +1%
Teclast T60 Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
368 (363min - 373max) MBit/s
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
352 (125min - 381max) MBit/s -4%
Honor Pad 9
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
349 (171min - 354max) MBit/s -5%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (20.1 - 695, n=189)
328 MBit/s -11%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
323 (218min - 377max) MBit/s -12%
Teclast T60
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
309 (244min - 321max) MBit/s -16%
050100150200250300350Tooltip
Teclast T60 Plus 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø263 (212-276)
Teclast T60 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø360 (341-370)
Teclast T60 Plus 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø368 (363-373)
Teclast T60 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø309 (244-321)
户外定位
户外定位
室内定位
室内定位

无论 12 英寸平板电脑的用户是否真的需要,确定 T60 Plus 位置的选项都提供了一定的灵活性。特别是在我们的实际测试中,GNSS 模块提供了令人惊讶的良好效果:除了所有常用的主要卫星系统--北斗(B1)、GPS(L1)、伽利略(E1)和格洛纳斯(L1)之外,我们的测试设备及其通信调制解调器还使用 A-GPS 进行定位。

尽管 T60 Plus 并非总能准确定位我们的位置,但与实际路线的偏差可以说很小。作为对比,我们使用的 Garmin Venu 2 在很大程度上提供了与 Teclast 平板电脑类似的结果。

Garmin Venu 2 定位
Garmin Venu 2 定位
Teclast T60 Plus 定位系统
Teclast T60 Plus 定位系统

摄像头 - Teclast T60 Plus(带单摄像头

使用 Teclast T60 Plus 拍摄的自拍照
使用 Teclast T60 Plus 拍摄的自拍照

内置在显示屏上方边框中的 800 万像素摄像头采用 f/2.8 光圈,在日光条件下效果不错。视频可以全高清分辨率录制。背面 1300 万像素摄像头解决方案的质量也好不到哪里去。虽然背面的模块看起来有两个镜头,但其中一个只是用于 LED 闪光灯。

T60 Plus 的摄像头在拍摄文件时表现尚可,但在基本的使用场景中,照度不足和明显的噪点可能会成为阻碍拍摄的因素。同样,自动对焦速度也非常慢。在光线较暗的条件下,这款入门级平板电脑很难再拍出像样的照片。

1x
1x
2x
2x
4 倍(最大值)
4 倍(最大值)
2025 平板电脑评测:Teclast T60 Plus
2025 平板电脑评测:Teclast T60 Plus
2025 平板电脑评测:Teclast T60 Plus

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

PlantSurroundingsLow Light

我们在可控光线条件下对 1300 万像素传感器的色彩准确性进行了更详细的观察。通过对色彩还原的分析,我们发现没有什么值得抱怨的地方,只是在拍摄书籍或文字时,黑色的色调不够理想。

ColorChecker
7 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
10 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
0.7 ∆E
3 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast T60 Plus: 6.51 ∆E min: 0.71 - max: 12.19 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
94.3 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast T60 Plus: 47.17 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 94.34 ∆E

配件和保修 - 入门级平板电脑包括一个充电器

Teclast T60 Plus 的 10 瓦充电器
Teclast T60 Plus 的 10 瓦充电器

尽管价格实惠,但在配件方面几乎没有任何妥协。包装盒中包括一条 USB 线(Type-A 转 Type-C)、一个用于打开卡槽的小工具、一个充电器和一些信息资料。

Teclast 为在德国购买其入门级平板电脑的用户提供 24 个月的保修服务。此外,还提供 24 小时客户服务。

输入设备和操作 - 不带指纹传感器的平板电脑

11.97 英寸 IPS 面板上的触摸输入快速而准确。据制造商称,该触摸屏的扫描速率为 120 Hz,这意味着面板每秒最多可扫描 120 次输入。由于刷新率为 90 Hz,动画显示相当流畅,即使有时 联发科 SoC虽然 1200p 的液晶屏分辨率相对较高,但有时也会让联发科 SoC 显得力不从心。这对性能产生了负面影响,导致了一些延迟。

遗憾的是,T60 Plus 没有提供指纹传感器,这在操作舒适度方面是一个明显的缺陷。通过生物人脸识别技术解锁只能使用前置摄像头,而且只能存储一张人脸。不过,虽然相当不安全,但在我们的测试中,2D 人脸识别在白天的表现还是令人信服的。

2025 平板电脑评测:Teclast T60 Plus
2025 平板电脑评测:Teclast T60 Plus
2025 平板电脑评测:Teclast T60 Plus

显示屏 - Teclast T60 Plus,90 赫兹

LC 显示屏采用经典的 RGB 子像素网格,由一个红光、一个蓝光和一个绿光二极管组成。
LC 显示屏采用经典的 RGB 子像素网格,由一个红光、一个蓝光和一个绿光二极管组成。

京东方 T60 Plus 的 IPS 面板采用全贴合技术,分辨率为 1200p,像素密度接近 200 ppi。刷新率高达 90 Hz。虽然仔细观察仍能看到像素结构,但清晰度已足够高。

在我们的亮度测量中,Teclast 平板电脑的最高亮度达到了 487 cd/m²,在同价位产品中非常具有吸引力,略高于制造商 400 尼特的规格。在最高 503 cd/m² 的情况下,我们的 APL18 测量(有亮区和暗区)结果显示液晶屏的亮度略高于显示完全白色区域的亮度,这并不令人十分惊讶。

对 PWM 比较敏感的用户应该会对 IPS 显示屏感到满意,因为我们无法在 T60 Plus 上检测到任何显示屏闪烁现象。

480
cd/m²
479
cd/m²
474
cd/m²
483
cd/m²
487
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
478
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 487 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 472.1 cd/m² Minimum: 22 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 487 cd/m²
Contrast: 1432:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.16 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9
ΔE Greyscale 6.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
78.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.38
Teclast T60 Plus
IPS LCD, 2000x1200, 12"
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
IPS, 2000x1200, 11.5"
Huawei MatePad SE 11
LCD, 1900x1200, 11"
Lenovo Tab Plus
IPS, 2000x1200, 11.5"
Honor Pad 9
IPS LCD, 2560x1600, 12.1"
Teclast T60
IPS, 2000x1200, 12"
Screen
33%
21%
19%
23%
18%
Brightness middle
487
473
-3%
461
-5%
465
-5%
613
26%
352
-28%
Brightness
472
449
-5%
451
-4%
438
-7%
570
21%
324
-31%
Brightness Distribution
92
87
-5%
87
-5%
88
-4%
87
-5%
88
-4%
Black Level *
0.34
0.25
26%
0.3
12%
0.3
12%
0.4
-18%
0.25
26%
Contrast
1432
1892
32%
1537
7%
1550
8%
1533
7%
1408
-2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.16
1.56
75%
2.48
60%
2.96
52%
2.7
56%
2.6
58%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.96
3.8
65%
4.9
55%
5.32
51%
5.1
53%
5.75
48%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.4
1.3
80%
3.5
45%
3.6
44%
3.7
42%
1.5
77%
Gamma
2.38 92%
2.178 101%
2.183 101%
2.372 93%
2.3 96%
2.319 95%
CCT
8212 79%
6726 97%
7471 87%
6016 108%
6763 96%
6747 96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8684 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

0.34 cd/m² 的黑色值为 T60 Plus 带来了约 1500:1 的良好对比度。我们使用 Calman 分析软件对显示器的色彩校准进行了评估。在 sRGB 色彩空间中,DeltaE 值明显超出了 <3 的目标值,与参考色彩的偏差很容易察觉。同样,灰阶也显示出明显的轻微色调。

色彩准确度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准)
色彩准确度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准)
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:Adobe RGB,配置文件:标准)
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:Adobe RGB,配置文件:标准)
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:P3,配置文件:标准)
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:P3,配置文件:标准)
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准)
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准)
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准)
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准)
饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准)
饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB,配置文件:标准)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.7 ms rise
↘ 14.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23.7 ms rise
↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

对于液晶面板的视角稳定性,没有什么可抱怨的。即使从陡峭的视角观看,亮度也只是略有降低,色彩看起来几乎没有失真。在室外,这款入门级平板电脑在寒风凛冽的光线条件下仍有足够的可读性,但仍需避免玻璃表面的反光。在盛夏,您可能只能在阴凉处使用 T60 Plus。

2025 平板电脑评测:Teclast T60 Plus(图片:Marcus Herbrich)
2025 平板电脑评测:Teclast T60 Plus(图片:Marcus Herbrich)
2025 平板电脑评测:Teclast T60 Plus(图片:Marcus Herbrich)

性能 - 配备联发科 SoC 的低价平板电脑

按照这个价位的惯例,在选择 SoC 时要特别注意节约成本。遗憾的是,Teclast 平板电脑也不例外。在日常操作中 Helio G88给人的感觉并不强劲,用户不得不接受一些卡顿和延迟。在我们的基准测试包中,T60 Plus 的性能相当弱,尤其是在多核测试中,甚至连 Unisoc T7255的性能要强得多。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=72, last 2 years)
1078 Points +150%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
944 Points +119%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
733 Points +70%
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
440 Points +2%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (432 - 442, n=6)
436 Points +1%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
432 Points
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
412 Points -5%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
323 Points -25%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=72, last 2 years)
3451 Points +213%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
2773 Points +151%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2018 Points +83%
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
1596 Points +45%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1425 Points +29%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1104 - 1436, n=6)
1277 Points +16%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1172 Points +6%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1104 Points
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
725 Points +107%
Average of class Tablet
  (103 - 1887, n=70, last 2 years)
694 Points +98%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
574 Points +64%
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
361 Points +3%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (284 - 378, n=7)
356 Points +2%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
350 Points
Huawei MatePad SE 11
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
304 Points -13%
Multi-Core
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
2763 Points +115%
Average of class Tablet
  (303 - 8624, n=70, last 2 years)
2462 Points +91%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1792 Points +39%
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
1502 Points +17%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1359 Points +6%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1132 - 1475, n=7)
1312 Points +2%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1288 Points
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 2716980, n=39, last 2 years)
756223 Points +202%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
490448 Points +96%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
404871 Points +62%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
329731 Points +32%
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
257601 Points +3%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
250503 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  ()
250503 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
235067 Points -6%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
11693 Points +58%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
11379 Points +54%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 20841, n=72, last 2 years)
9927 Points +34%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
8752 Points +19%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (6789 - 9802, n=7)
8567 Points +16%
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
7992 Points +8%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
7383 Points
Huawei MatePad SE 11
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
7102 Points -4%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet
  (172 - 1944, n=62, last 2 years)
769 Points +141%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
689 Points +116%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
561 Points +76%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
419 Points +31%
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
386 Points +21%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
337 Points +6%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (319 - 326, n=3)
322 Points +1%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
319 Points
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
4233 Points +95%
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 11721, n=57, last 2 years)
4206 Points +94%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3004 Points +38%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2383 Points +10%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (2172 - 2396, n=4)
2287 Points +5%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2187 Points +1%
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
2182 Points 0%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2172 Points
System
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
10083 Points +158%
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 16435, n=57, last 2 years)
7229 Points +85%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
5890 Points +51%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
5259 Points +35%
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
5151 Points +32%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
4598 Points +18%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (3901 - 4695, n=4)
4282 Points +10%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
3901 Points
Memory
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
4837 Points +101%
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 10977, n=57, last 2 years)
4827 Points +100%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
4104 Points +70%
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
3255 Points +35%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
3128 Points +30%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (2412 - 3358, n=4)
2958 Points +23%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2554 Points +6%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2412 Points
Graphics
Average of class Tablet
  (418 - 57192, n=57, last 2 years)
9146 Points +374%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
5783 Points +200%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2697 Points +40%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2243 Points +16%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1878 - 1960, n=4)
1930 Points 0%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1928 Points
Huawei MatePad SE 11
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1438 Points -25%
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
1146 Points -41%
Web
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2051, n=57, last 2 years)
1282 Points +10%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1249 Points +8%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
1192 Points +3%
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
1179 Points +2%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1161 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (1042 - 1161, n=4)
1113 Points -4%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1071 Points -8%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1046 Points -10%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet
  (2597 - 74821, n=55, last 2 years)
10859 Points +128%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
9075 Points +91%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
7236 Points +52%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
4759 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (3367 - 5025, n=4)
4206 Points -12%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
3820 Points -20%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
3564 Points -25%
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
2902 Points -39%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet
  (84 - 156427, n=49, last 2 years)
7370 Points +1380%
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  (498 - 3367, n=3)
1555 Points +212%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
913 Points +83%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
644 Points +29%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
498 Points
Teclast T60
Unisoc T7255 (T616), Mali-G57 MP1, 8192
321 Points -36%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
258 Points -48%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
248 Points -50%
AI Benchmark - Score V6
Average of class Tablet
  (99.7 - 7341, n=4, last 2 years)
1986 Points +1892%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
113 Points +13%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
99.7 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G88
  ()
99.7 Points 0%

在图形处理方面,Mali-G52 MP2 Mali-G52 MP2集成在 Helio G88无法提供令人信服的性能。Teclast 平板电脑并不适合 HFR 游戏,GFXBench 的测试结果显示,屏幕上的速度只有 40 fps。在与经济型 平板电脑竞争对手T60 Plus 在 GPU 性能方面的表现仍略高于 CPU 基准测试。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
611 Points +234%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
337 Points +84%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
183 Points
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
158 Points -14%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
127 Points -31%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
127 Points -31%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
618 Points +227%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
347 Points +84%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
189 Points
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
155 Points -18%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
129 Points -32%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
123 Points -35%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2402 Points +219%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1232 Points +64%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
753 Points
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
583 Points -23%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
579 Points -23%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
476 Points -37%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2367 Points +221%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1246 Points +69%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
738 Points
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
598 Points -19%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
576 Points -22%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
479 Points -35%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3642 Points +81%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
2990 Points +49%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2499 Points +24%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2499 Points +24%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2012 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2449 Points +95%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1325 Points +6%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1254 Points
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
985 Points -21%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
937 Points -25%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2641 Points +93%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1479 Points +8%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1367 Points
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1121 Points -18%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
1106 Points -19%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +48%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps +43%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
40 fps
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
39 fps -2%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
24 fps -40%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
105 fps +139%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps +43%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
44 fps
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
40 fps -9%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
25 fps -43%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
37 fps +54%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps +46%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
20 fps -17%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
16 fps -33%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps +148%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps +60%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
21 fps -16%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
16 fps -36%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps +60%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps +60%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
14 fps -7%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
9.5 fps -37%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps +188%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps +63%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
15 fps -6%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
9.8 fps -39%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps +79%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11 fps +41%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
8.1 fps +4%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.8 fps
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
5.7 fps -27%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps +140%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps +56%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9.6 fps
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
8.5 fps -11%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
6.1 fps -36%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.4 fps +88%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.4 fps +88%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5 fps
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
4.7 fps -6%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
3.7 fps -26%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11.2 fps +261%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6 fps +94%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3.1 fps
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2.9 fps -6%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
2.3 fps -26%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps +100%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps +100%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.5 fps
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
7.4 fps -1%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
5.8 fps -23%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps +292%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps +103%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.9 fps
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
7.3 fps -8%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
6.2 fps -22%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4.8 fps +243%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.5 fps +79%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1.2 fps -14%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
0.98 fps -30%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%

T60 Plus 的浏览器性能在基准测试和日常操作中都是可以接受的,尽管 Teclast 平板电脑在这方面也没有表现出多么强大。尤其是在冲浪时,90 赫兹的面板让用户受益匪浅。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=67, last 2 years)
113.8 Points +137%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
88.235 Points +84%
Lenovo Tab Plus (Chrome 126.0.6478.122)
80.918 Points +69%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)
66.048 Points +38%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)
56.281 Points +17%
Teclast T60 Plus (Chrome 131)
47.986 Points
Huawei MatePad SE 11
35.847 Points -25%
Average Mediatek Helio G88 (28.1 - 48, n=4)
35.1 Points -27%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 33.7, n=28, last 2 years)
12.4 runs/min +296%
Lenovo Tab Plus (Chrome 126.0.6478.122)
5.01 runs/min +60%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
4.74 runs/min +51%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)
3.7 runs/min +18%
Teclast T60 Plus (Chrome 131)
3.13 runs/min
Average Mediatek Helio G88 ()
3.13 runs/min 0%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 (Hauwei Browser V14)
1.25 runs/min -60%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=66, last 2 years)
109.6 Points +103%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
95 Points +76%
Lenovo Tab Plus (Chrome 126.0.6478.122)
89 Points +65%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)
68 Points +26%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)
60 Points +11%
Teclast T60 Plus (Chrome 131)
54 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G88 (31 - 54, n=3)
41 Points -24%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 (Hauwei Browser V14)
39 Points -28%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
32436 Points +115%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)
29229 Points +94%
Lenovo Tab Plus (Chrome 126.0.6478.122)
24857 Points +65%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)
16498 Points +9%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)
15304 Points +1%
Teclast T60 Plus (Chrome 131)
15102 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G88 (7611 - 15102, n=7)
10721 Points -29%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 (Hauwei Browser V14)
10018 Points -34%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average Mediatek Helio G88 (2743 - 5573, n=4)
4111 ms * -50%
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=73, last 2 years)
3747 ms * -37%
Huawei MatePad SE 11 (Hauwei Browser V14)
3675.3 ms * -34%
Teclast T60 Plus (Chrome 131)
2743.4 ms *
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)
2592 ms * +6%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)
2459.4 ms * +10%
Lenovo Tab Plus (Chrome 126.0.6478.122)
1670.9 ms * +39%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
1321.1 ms * +52%

* ... smaller is better

在我们的 AndroBench 基准测试中,目前已经相当老化的 eMMC 存储设备只能达到非常低的数值。与 联想 Tab Plus相比,Teclast 平板电脑的读写速度要低得多。

Teclast T60 PlusLenovo Tab K11 PlusHuawei MatePad SE 11Lenovo Tab PlusHonor Pad 9Teclast T60Average 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
660%
267%
632%
853%
116%
96%
534%
Sequential Read 256KB
296.42
1003.25
238%
528.79
78%
991.99
235%
1921.34
548%
240.4
-19%
Sequential Write 256KB
193.23
876.29
353%
103.41
-46%
837.52
333%
1222.83
533%
230
19%
Random Read 4KB
49.58
244.03
392%
166.24
235%
240.56
385%
256.06
416%
76.4
54%
Random Write 4KB
13.21
232.16
1657%
119.02
801%
221.09
1574%
266.17
1915%
67.5
411%

游戏 - Teclast T60 Plus GPU 性能较弱

如果您购买的平板电脑价格低于 130 欧元(约合 134 美元),您就不应该指望它能带来快速的游戏体验,但它配备了 Mali GPU但它所使用的 Mali GPU 仍适合低显卡的老游戏。我们使用GameBench 应用程序来看看 T60 Plus 每秒能运行多少帧。.

在最高 40 帧/秒的情况下,《PUBG Mobile》可以在最低细节下相当流畅地运行,但在高清设置下,只能达到 30 帧/秒,帧数的下降非常明显。我们的第二款测试游戏《Genshin Impact》对图形处理能力的要求显然超出了 T60 Plus 的能力范围。即使在最低图形设置下,我们也只能平均达到 18 帧/秒。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0510152025303540Tooltip
Teclast T60 Plus; Genshin Impact: Ø17.6 (7-23)
Teclast T60 Plus; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø37.4 (14-41)
Teclast T60 Plus; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø29.3 (19-32)

排放 - 入门级平板电脑保持冷静

温度

对于 Teclast 平板电脑来说,发热仍然是一个陌生的概念。无论是在空闲运行还是在负载情况下,外壳的表面温度都几乎不值一提。此外,我们还评估了 Helio G88的稳定性。

在 Wild Life 压力测试的两个测试场景中,联发科 SoC 的性能节流都很小。相应地,我们也没有看到高负载下帧速率的降低。

Max. Load
 31.9 °C27.4 °C27.5 °C 
 36.1 °C27.5 °C27.5 °C 
 31.6 °C27.5 °C27.5 °C 
Maximum: 36.1 °C
Average: 29.4 °C
27.3 °C28.1 °C29.8 °C
27.8 °C27.9 °C32 °C
27 °C28.2 °C29.6 °C
Maximum: 32 °C
Average: 28.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.9 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
99.5 %
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
99.1 % 0%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.5 % 0%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
99.3 %
Lenovo Tab Plus
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 % 0%
Huawei MatePad SE 11
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710A, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
98.1 % -1%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.6 % -2%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
89.1 % -10%
00.20.40.70.91.11.31.61.822.22.42.72.93.13.33.63.844.2Tooltip
Teclast T60 Plus Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø1.146 (1.141-1.149)
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.758 (0.748-0.766)
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.787 (0.742-0.833)
Teclast T60 Plus Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.44 (4.43-4.45)
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.56 (3.55-3.56)
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255 (T616), 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.87 (2.85-2.87)
2025 平板电脑评测:Teclast T60 Plus
2025 平板电脑评测:Teclast T60 Plus

发言人

Teclast T60 Plus 的编解码器选择
Teclast T60 Plus 的编解码器选择

T60 Plus 采用双扬声器系统,位于机身底部,可提供立体声体验。我们对 Teclast 平板电脑的测量结果显示,中频的波形频率曲线明显,而且声音频谱中没有低音。但在这个价位的产品中,音质还是可以的。

如果要通过有线耳机聆听,T60 Plus 提供了一个 3.5 毫米音频接口,可以重现低音更丰富的声音。在无线连接方面,T60 Plus 支持蓝牙,但编解码器的选择非常有限,只有 SBC、AAC 和 LDAC。虽然制造商指定 5.2 为蓝牙标准,但其 联发科芯片组官方仅支持较早的 BT 5.0。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.838.62538.235.33132.931.24033.536.65037.537.86327.126.68021.121.31002421.712521.729.716019.540.220016.847.32501353.631515.557.740014.160.250015.765.963020.371.480022.677.7100019.280.4125016.176.1160014.372.5200012.369.825001566.3315019.973.9400021.770.3500024.171.8630023.272.7800026.974.41000025.771.41250019.161.9160002449.7SPL33.585.8N1.765median 19.5median 69.8Delta49.535.837.14032.930.328.833.632.436.630.52726.520.619.916.817.616.130.114.94510.347.87.245.77.351.37.857.49.259.6866.49.470.215.270.19.366.98.9689.768.710.765.211.264.91260.812.865.313.659.714.458.515.362.51653.116.938.824.2780.541median 11.2median 59.73.110.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseTeclast T60 PlusTeclast T60
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Teclast T60 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Teclast T60 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 价格实惠、电池容量大的平板电脑

耗电量

T60 Plus 电池容量为 8,000 毫安时,使用附带的 10 瓦充电器可在约 3 小时内充满电。Teclast 平板电脑在使用大功率电量电池时表现有些不稳定:一个 小米移动电源 25000以及另一款配备 Power Delivery 3.0(130 瓦)的电源箱在我们的测试中都无法正常工作。同样,我们自己的充电器功率超过 30 瓦时也无法为 T60 Plus 供电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.8 / 2.2 / 2.9 Watt
Load midlight 6.7 / 11.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Teclast T60 Plus
8000 mAh
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
8600 mAh
Huawei MatePad SE 11
7700 mAh
Lenovo Tab Plus
8600 mAh
Honor Pad 9
8300 mAh
Teclast T60
8000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio G88
 
Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
35%
14%
39%
-106%
33%
26%
-37%
Idle Minimum *
1.8
1.1
39%
1.7
6%
1.2
33%
1.5
17%
1.2
33%
1.11 ?(0.53 - 1.8, n=3)
38%
Idle Average *
2.2
1.3
41%
1.9
14%
1.6
27%
8.39
-281%
1.4
36%
1.803 ?(1.2 - 2.2, n=3)
18%
Idle Maximum *
2.9
1.6
45%
2.2
24%
1.8
38%
8.46
-192%
1.7
41%
2.14 ?(1.5 - 2.9, n=3)
26%
Load Average *
6.7
4.4
34%
5.9
12%
3.7
45%
11.65
-74%
4.2
37%
Load Maximum *
11.4
9.8
14%
9.7
15%
5.7
50%
11.67
-2%
9.5
17%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Teclast T60 Plus Mediatek Helio G88; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.6 (4.76-11.4)
Teclast T60 Unisoc T7255 (T616); Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.8 (4.25-10.2)
Teclast T60 Plus Mediatek Helio G88; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.95 (2.91-3.01)
Teclast T60 Unisoc T7255 (T616); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.256 (1.129-1.568)

Power Consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Teclast T60 Plus Mediatek Helio G88; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.42 (6.77-8.17)
Teclast T60 Unisoc T7255 (T616); 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.59 (5.39-6.38)
Teclast T60 Plus Mediatek Helio G88; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.95 (2.91-3.01)
Teclast T60 Unisoc T7255 (T616); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.256 (1.129-1.568)

电池寿命

在亮度为 150 cd/m² 的实际电池测试中,Teclast 平板电脑的无线局域网使用时间超过 11 小时,视频播放时间超过 11.5 小时,对于一款 12 英寸平板电脑来说,电池续航时间表现不错。不过,由于 SoC在负载情况下,我们本希望电池续航时间稍长一些。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
17h 54min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 131)
11h 07min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 25min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 12min
Teclast T60 Plus
8000 mAh
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
8600 mAh
Huawei MatePad SE 11
7700 mAh
Lenovo Tab Plus
8600 mAh
Honor Pad 9
8300 mAh
Teclast T60
8000 mAh
Battery Runtime
23%
49%
104%
-1%
92%
Reader / Idle
1074
1517
41%
1992
85%
2657
147%
3313
208%
H.264
685
727
6%
953
39%
1113
62%
1145
67%
WiFi v1.3
667
734
10%
931
40%
1450
117%
661
-1%
1096
64%
Load
192
260
35%
254
32%
367
91%
249
30%

笔记本检查总体评价

总的来说,Teclast T60 Plus 是一款性价比很高的产品,尽管它仍然没有达到规格表中的高期望值。那些追求高性价比的用户肯定不会失望。

Teclast T60 Plus - 01/18/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
80 / 98 → 82%
Keyboard
69 / 80 → 87%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
37 / 69 → 54%
Weight
81 / 40-88 → 86%
Battery
89%
Display
77%
Games Performance
3 / 65 → 4%
Application Performance
38 / 92 → 42%
AI Performance
15%
Temperature
95%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 91 → 81%
Average
54%
74%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
25%
Power Use
93.5%
Repairability
30%
Software Updates
33.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 34.5%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Teclast T60 Plus 评测:售价 130 美元的 12 英寸平板电脑,承诺过高
Marcus Herbrich, 2025-01-21 (Update: 2025-01-21)