联想 Tab Plus 平板电脑评测--价值 300 美元的娱乐产品拥有最佳音效

Name: Lenovo Tab Plus
Brand: Lenovo

音频体验

价格低廉的平板电脑通常不会有太多令人惊喜的功能。但 11.5 英寸的联想 Tab Plus 并非如此，它的 26 瓦强大音响系统甚至会让音乐迷们感到高兴。由于配备了 8 个 JBL 扬声器和杜比全景声（Dolby Atmos），这款售价 300 美元的平板电脑拥有比Apple iPad Pro 等更昂贵的平板电脑更好的音效。

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 08/02/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Tablet Touchscreen

联想在设计 Tab Plus 时考虑到了娱乐性，并承诺提供非凡的音效体验。为此，制造商为这款 11.5 英寸平板电脑配备了八个支持杜比全景声（Dolby Atmos）的扬声器，总输出功率达 26 瓦。

为了创造必要的空间，Tab Plus 的外壳形状与众不同，底部加厚。底部还安装了一个折叠式可调节支架，便于平板电脑的支撑。

联想的平板电脑售价并不高，128 GB 机型的起价为 289.99 美元。这款平板电脑的售价并不高，因为官方称拥有 256 GB 存储空间的顶级机型售价仅高出 10 美元左右。

该平板电脑的其他功能包括：2K 分辨率的 IPS 显示屏、充电功率高达 45 瓦的 8600 毫安时电池、蓝牙 5.2 和 WiFi 5。Tab Plus 预装了Android 14，制造商保证将其升级到Android 16。

Test device courtesy of Lenovo

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo Tab Plus

Processor

Mediatek Helio G99 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G57 MP2

Memory

8 GB

, LPDDR4x

Display

11.50 inch 15:9, 2000 x 1200 pixel 204 PPI, capacitive, native pen support, IPS, 2K, 400 nits, glossy: yes, 90 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB

, 109 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm headset jack, Card Reader: microSD up to1 TB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Ambient light sensor, Gyroscope, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi Display, Camera2 API Full

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.2, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 13.58 x 268.3 x 174.25

Battery

8600 mAh Lithium-Polymer, max. charging speed 45W (11V/4.5A)

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 14

Camera

Primary Camera: 8 MPix AF
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix fixed focus

Additional features

Speakers: 8 JBL Hi-Fi Speakers, 4x tweeters, 4x force-balanced bass units, Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: virtual, USB-C cable, SIM tool, Quick start guide, Warranty information, 24 Months Warranty, integrated Kickstand, fanless

Weight

660 g

Price

299 Euro

Amazon

$299.25

Links

Lenovo homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Version	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
77.8 %	v8	08 / 2024	Lenovo Tab Plus Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2	660 g	13.58 mm	11.50"	2000x1200
84.8 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	03 / 2024	Honor Pad 9 SD 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710	555 g	6.96 mm	12.10"	2560x1600
83.4 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	05 / 2024	Lenovo Tab M11 Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2	465 g	7.2 mm	11.00"	1920x1200
84.2 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	02 / 2024	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ SD 695 5G, Adreno 619	480 g	6.9 mm	11.00"	1920x1200
80.7 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	01 / 2024	Teclast T60 T7255, Mali-G57 MP1	570 g	7.7 mm	11.97"	2000x1200
83.5 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	01 / 2024	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE SD 680, Adreno 610	481 g	7.36 mm	11.00"	1920x1200

请注意：我们更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息请点击此处.

外壳 - 铝质外壳，带脚架

联想 Tab Plus 采用哑光铝合金外壳。它看起来很时尚，摸起来手感很好，而且给平板电脑带来了极大的稳定性。它几乎不可能凹陷或扭曲。平板电脑的防尘防水性能符合 IP52 标准。这意味着它可以承受几滴水，但最好不要带着平板电脑潜水。

联想 Tab Plus 重 660 克，对于这种尺寸的平板电脑来说相对较重。它的外壳也不是特别平整，下半部厚达 13.58 毫米。上半部分则纤薄很多，只有 7.77 毫米。两侧还安装了总共 8 个兼容杜比全景声（Dolby Atmos）的扬声器。

这款平板电脑之所以会有两种不同的机身高度，不仅是因为它集成了音响系统，还因为它集成了脚架。后者位于后盖下部的中间位置，可以通过机械铰链折叠出近 180 度，并牢牢固定住位置。这使得联想平板电脑可以非常灵活地支撑起来，但这只有在横向模式下才能真正发挥作用。如果有必要，90 度角也可以用于纵向模式，但这种方式非常不稳定。

联想平板电脑只提供一种名为 "月光灰"的灰色外壳。

尺寸比较

连接性 - 8 GB 内存和至少 128 GB 存储空间

联想为 Tab Plus 配备了至少 128 GB 的存储空间，这在 300 美元以下的平板电脑中并不多见。此外，它没有使用速度较慢的 eMMC 存储器，而是配备了相对较快的 UFS 2.2 存储器。这可以确保缩短加载时间。

联想官方对配备 8GB 内存和 128GB 的小存储版本收费 289.99 美元。而配备 8GB 内存和 256GB 存储空间的大容量版本仅贵 10 美元。其存储空间还可通过 microSD 卡扩展至 1 TB。

联想为其平板电脑配备了 8 个扬声器，声音非常震撼。相比之下，它的其他功能在这个价位的平板电脑中算是比较标准的。Tab Plus 没有指纹传感器，其 USB-C 端口的工作速度为 USB 2.0。

microSD 读卡器

联想平板电脑的 microSD 读卡器是同类产品中速度最快的。在我们使用 Angelbird AV Pro V60 microSD 参考卡进行的复制测试中，它的速度达到了 39.7 MB/s，仅次于三星Galaxy Tab A9+超过。该读卡器的连续读写速度也不错（分别为 72.4 MByte/s 和 38.5 MByte/s）。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	47.18 MB/s +19%
Lenovo Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	39.7 MB/s
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	34.4 MB/s -13%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)	29.8 MB/s -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	28.92 MB/s -27%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Lenovo Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø38.5 (30-53.1)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.8 (29.7-46.3)

Lenovo Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø72.4 (16.9-78.5)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78 (60.4-86.2)

软件 -Android 14 和触控笔应用程序

联想 Tab Plus 运行Android 14，制造商承诺将操作系统升级到Android 16，并提供 4 年的安全更新。安全更新将持续到 2028 年 6 月。

联想为 Tab Plus 的Android OS 增加了一些额外功能。兼容的应用程序（如 Chrome 浏览器、照片和 YouTube 音乐）可以分屏显示，也可以在可自由定位的窗口中打开。这可以通过相应顶栏的三点菜单进行设置。并非所有应用程序都支持特殊视图，有些应用程序（如 YouTube）只支持其中一种（分屏）。

预装的软件种类不多，只有两个第三方应用程序，即 WPS Office 和放松应用程序 Tide。除了联想的支持应用 Vantage 外，还有两款为选配的Tab Pen Plus 量身定制的生产力工具，即记事本和手写笔。手写笔定制的两款生产力工具，即笔记应用程序 Nebo 和计算器应用程序 MyScript Calculator 2。

可持续性

Tab Plus 100%使用回收铝。与此同时，联想还在设备包装中使用了竹子和甘蔗等生物基材料，以最大限度地减少生态足迹。该制造商承诺到 2050 年实现气候中和。联想还提供CO² 抵消服务。该服务可以补偿设备在生产、交付和使用过程中产生的碳排放。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 WiFi 5 的联想 Tab Plus

除了蓝牙 5.2，联想 Tab Plus 还支持 WiFi 5。遗憾的是，联想没有提供蜂窝版本的平板电脑。NFC 也不在其功能范围之内。

与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器连接后，联想 Tab Plus 实现了 WiFi 5 的典型数据吞吐量。峰值为 372 MBit/s，因此与对比设备不相上下。其数据传输在发送和接收方向都非常稳定。

Networking
Lenovo Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	372 (min: 362) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	354 (min: 289) MBit/s ∼96%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	349 (min: 171) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	366 (min: 184) MBit/s ∼99%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	304 (min: 283) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	360 (min: 353) MBit/s ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	340 (min: 172) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	369 (min: 356) MBit/s ∼100%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	309 (min: 244) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	360 (min: 341) MBit/s ∼98%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	307 (min: 284) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	369 (min: 179) MBit/s ∼100%

Lenovo Tab Plus Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø372 (362-397)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø333 (172-350)

Lenovo Tab Plus Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø354 (289-365)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø369 (356-387)

Tab Plus 通过 GPS、Glonass 和 Galileo 卫星导航服务确定当前位置。在我们的测试中，无论是在室内还是室外，它的定位精度都能达到 1 米。

在一次短途自行车骑行中，它的精确度不如用于比较的 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表。不过，总的来说，联想平板电脑非常适合导航任务。

摄像头 - 主摄像头和自拍摄像头各 800 万像素

关于 Tab Plus 的摄像头，联想没有过多介绍。前后各有一个 800 万像素的摄像头，背壳上的摄像头还具有自动对焦功能。这样的基本规格通常表明，你不能对图像质量抱太大期望。恰恰相反，联想平板电脑的摄像头没什么可隐藏的。

摄影爱好者可能会对 Tab Plus 的自拍摄像头和主摄像头感到不满意，因为这两个摄像头都无法捕捉到很多细节，而且较暗的主体部分会出现大量图像噪点。不过，在光线充足的条件下，自拍摄像头和主摄像头能拍摄出色彩艳丽、自然的合格照片。甚至在光线不足的条件下也能拍出不错的照片。两个摄像头都能以每秒 30 帧的速度录制高达 1080p 的视频。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1 Daylight photo 2 Low-light photo

click to load images

Lenovo Tab Plus

Canon EOS 600D

Apple iPhone 15

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

click to load images

Lenovo Tab Plus

Canon EOS 600D

Apple iPhone 15

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

click to load images

Lenovo Tab Plus

Canon EOS 600D

Apple iPhone 15

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

在我们的测试实验室，我们在可控的照明条件下再次仔细观察了主摄像头。在最佳照明条件下，主摄像头能够相当准确地捕捉色彩（最大 Delta-E 值为 9.86），并完整地再现了测试图表，但并不是在每个区域都很清晰。在 1 勒克斯的残余光线下，测试图和 ColorChecker 色彩图只能模糊地看到。

配件和保修 - 电源和触控笔需额外付费

Tab Plus 随附一条 USB-C 连接线、SIM 卡工具、简短的说明书以及一本包含安全和保修信息的小册子。

联想为其平板电脑提供了四种配件：一款名为 Tab Pen Plus 的手写笔（具有 4096 个压力和倾斜检测级别）、一个保护套、一个蓝牙键盘和一个 68 瓦的电源。不过，平板电脑的最大充电功率只有 45 瓦。

该平板电脑在美国享有 12 个月的标准保修服务。您可以付费将保修期延长 3 年。

输入设备和操作 - 90 赫兹显示和画框模式

联想平板电脑可通过 90 赫兹的触摸屏流畅操作。虽然八核联发科 Helio G99SoC 功能不够强大，但也能很好地处理流媒体应用程序和网页浏览。我们的游戏测试表明，Tab Plus 甚至可以运行要求更高的游戏，如《 PUBG Mobile》，只要细节级别设置得不高。

Tab Plus 没有指纹传感器。生物识别认证只能通过自拍摄像头进行二维面部识别。只要有良好的环境光线或足够明亮的显示屏，这种方法就能快速、可靠地解锁平板电脑。

由于采用了脚架，联想平板电脑看起来有点像相框，使用方式也类似。启动待机模式时（在显示设置中找到），Tab Plus 会显示选定的照片和当前时间。不过，这两种功能都只能在平板电脑充电时使用。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 对比度丰富的 IPS 面板

联想 Tab Plus 的 11.5 英寸 IPS 显示屏分辨率为 2000 x 1200 像素，因此能提供足够清晰的图像（像素密度为 204 PPI）。它不支持 HDR。

在显示纯白背景时，IPS 面板的平均亮度为 438 cd/m²，最高可达 465 cd/m²。在亮暗图像区域均匀分布的情况下（APL18 测量），最大亮度为 420 cd/m²。这意味着 Tab Plus 的 IPS 面板与同价位的对比设备一样明亮，因此它主要是一款室内平板电脑。

由于对比度高达 1550:1，IPS 面板能生动地显示内容，在其他图像参数方面也表现出色。当我们使用照片光谱仪和卡尔曼分析软件检查 IPS 面板时，其白平衡和色彩还原并不十分理想。不过，肉眼应该不会发现其偏离最佳状态。

我们没有注意到 IPS 面板上的脉宽调制（PWM）引起的任何显示闪烁。


422 cd/m²	434 cd/m²	448 cd/m²
411 cd/m²	465 cd/m²	444 cd/m²
424 cd/m²	453 cd/m²	437 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 465 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 437.6 cd/m² Minimum: 4.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 465 cd/m²
Contrast: 1550:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.96 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.372

	Lenovo Tab Plus IPS, 2000x1200, 11.5"	Honor Pad 9 IPS LCD, 2560x1600, 12.1"	Lenovo Tab M11 IPS, 1920x1200, 11"	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11"	Teclast T60 IPS, 2000x1200, 12"	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11"
Screen		5%	-53%	-46%	2%	4%
Brightness middle	465	613 32%	431 -7%	493 6%	352 -24%	473 2%
Brightness	438	570 30%	405 -8%	460 5%	324 -26%	449 3%
Brightness Distribution	88	87 -1%	88 0%	90 2%	88 0%	85 -3%
Black Level *	0.3	0.4 -33%	0.4 -33%	0.35 -17%		0.28 7%
Contrast	1550	1533 -1%	1078 -30%	1409 -9%		1689 9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.96	2.7 9%	9.72 -228%	6 -103%	2.6 12%	3 -1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.32	5.1 4%	11.59 -118%	11.7 -120%	5.75 -8%	6 -13%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.6	3.7 -3%	3.6 -0%	8.2 -128%	1.5 58%	2.7 25%
Gamma	2.372 ^93%	2.3 ^96%	2.194 ^100%	2.21 ^100%	2.319 ^95%	2.27 ^97%
CCT	6016 ^108%	6763 ^96%	7348 ^88%	9131 ^71%	6747 ^96%	6589 ^99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
23.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10 ms rise
23.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 31 ms rise
51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

在室外，联想 Tab Plus 视角稳定的 IPS 面板表现出色，在阴暗处也能提供良好的可读性。但在阳光直射下，由于显示屏表面反光强烈，内容几乎无法辨认。

性能 - 配备联发科 Helio G99 处理器的联想 Tab Plus

八核心联发科 Helio G99SoC 为联想平板电脑提供了稳定的系统性能。如果你使用 Tab Plus 进行多媒体应用和网上冲浪，也就是它的设计任务，那么它在日常使用中也能流畅运行。除了 SoC 的出色性能外，8GB RAM 也为其提供了保证，这在这个价位的平板电脑中是找不到的。

在合成基准测试中，Tab Plus 位列中游。与 Honor Pad 9和三星Galaxy Tab A9+一起，它是比较领域中速度最快的平板电脑之一，但在整体性能上却无法与它们相提并论。联想联想 Tab M11、 Teclast T60和小米红米 Pad SE显然都比它更胜一筹。

Geekbench 6.3
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=68, last 2 years)	3518 Points +74%
Honor Pad 9	2773 Points +37%
Lenovo Tab Plus	2018 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	1993 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1864 - 2065, n=11)	1987 Points -2%
Teclast T60	1596 Points -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	1439 Points -29%
Lenovo Tab M11	1379 Points -32%
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=68, last 2 years)	1093 Points +49%
Honor Pad 9	944 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	919 Points +25%
Lenovo Tab Plus	733 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (710 - 738, n=11)	728 Points -1%
Teclast T60	440 Points -40%
Lenovo Tab M11	436 Points -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	413 Points -44%

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Honor Pad 9	725 Points +26%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)	707 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	693 Points +21%
Lenovo Tab Plus	574 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (490 - 576, n=17)	547 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	384 Points -33%
Lenovo Tab M11	364 Points -37%
Teclast T60	361 Points -37%
Multi-Core
Honor Pad 9	2763 Points +54%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)	2496 Points +39%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1670 - 1981, n=17)	1828 Points +2%
Lenovo Tab Plus	1792 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	1768 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	1684 Points -6%
Teclast T60	1502 Points -16%
Lenovo Tab M11	1475 Points -18%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (164396 - 2716980, n=36, last 2 years)	759506 Points +88%
Honor Pad 9	490448 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	422144 Points +4%
Lenovo Tab Plus	404871 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (383511 - 421861, n=5)	400611 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	287727 Points -29%
Teclast T60	257601 Points -36%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=49, last 2 years)	464403 Points +24%
Lenovo Tab Plus	375956 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	354299 Points -6%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (229468 - 375956, n=8)	317183 Points -16%
Teclast T60	235075 Points -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	201810 Points -46%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Honor Pad 9	11693 Points +3%
Lenovo Tab Plus	11379 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	10550 Points -7%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (8885 - 11379, n=17)	9894 Points -13%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)	9812 Points -14%
Lenovo Tab M11	9802 Points -14%
Teclast T60	7992 Points -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	7068 Points -38%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)	772 Points +38%
Honor Pad 9	689 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	578 Points +3%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (526 - 602, n=10)	565 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab Plus	561 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	402 Points -28%
Teclast T60	386 Points -31%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Honor Pad 9	4233 Points +41%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)	4210 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	3596 Points +20%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (2855 - 3120, n=10)	3006 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab Plus	3004 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	2551 Points -15%
Teclast T60	2182 Points -27%
System
Honor Pad 9	10083 Points +71%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	7626 Points +29%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)	7279 Points +24%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (5261 - 6776, n=10)	6230 Points +6%
Lenovo Tab Plus	5890 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	5580 Points -5%
Teclast T60	5151 Points -13%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)	4874 Points +19%
Honor Pad 9	4837 Points +18%
Lenovo Tab Plus	4104 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	3872 Points -6%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (3454 - 4152, n=10)	3764 Points -8%
Teclast T60	3255 Points -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	3120 Points -24%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)	9171 Points +240%
Honor Pad 9	5783 Points +114%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	4337 Points +61%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (2683 - 3002, n=10)	2799 Points +4%
Lenovo Tab Plus	2697 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	2179 Points -19%
Teclast T60	1146 Points -58%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	1307 Points +5%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)	1269 Points +2%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1150 - 1325, n=10)	1252 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab Plus	1249 Points
Honor Pad 9	1192 Points -5%
Teclast T60	1179 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	1116 Points -11%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=51, last 2 years)	7152 Points +683%
Lenovo Tab Plus	913 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (877 - 982, n=8)	908 Points -1%
Honor Pad 9	644 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	429 Points -53%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	348 Points -62%
Teclast T60	321 Points -65%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)	11329 Points +25%
Lenovo Tab Plus	9075 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (6323 - 9695, n=9)	8584 Points -5%
Honor Pad 9	7236 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	5687 Points -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	4150 Points -54%
Teclast T60	2902 Points -68%

Geekbench ML
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (112 - 834, n=6, last 2 years)	380 Points
Lenovo Tab Plus	Points
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Average of class Tablet (66 - 6806, n=8, last 2 years)	1160 Points +537%
Lenovo Tab Plus	182 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 ()	182 Points 0%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU
Average of class Tablet (137 - 4617, n=8, last 2 years)	1014 Points +157%
Lenovo Tab Plus	394 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 ()	394 Points 0%

Legend

Lenovo Tab Plus Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 710, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Lenovo Tab M11 Mediatek Helio G88, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Teclast T60 Unisoc T7255, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Average Mediatek Helio G99

Average of class Tablet

在 GPU 基准测试中也可以看到与合成基准测试相同的结果。在 Honor Pad 9和三星Galaxy Tab A9+之后，Tab Plus 排名第三。在 GFXBench Manhattan 测试中，联想平板电脑以每秒 37 帧的速度显示，它也能流畅运行对图形要求较高的游戏。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	611 Points +81%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	354 Points +5%
Lenovo Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	337 Points
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	178 Points -47%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	127 Points -62%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	121 Points -64%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	618 Points +78%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	361 Points +4%
Lenovo Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	347 Points
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	179 Points -48%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	129 Points -63%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	123 Points -65%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2402 Points +95%
Lenovo Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1232 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1206 Points -2%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	700 Points -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	574 Points -53%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	476 Points -61%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2367 Points +90%
Lenovo Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1246 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1216 Points -2%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	702 Points -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	589 Points -53%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	479 Points -62%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3075 Points +16%
Lenovo Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2641 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1429 Points -46%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1385 Points -48%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	1106 Points -58%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2991 Points +22%
Lenovo Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2449 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1309 Points -47%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1203 Points -51%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	937 Points -62%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Lenovo Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3642 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3409 Points -6%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	2990 Points -18%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2935 Points -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2105 Points -42%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	82 fps +44%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps +4%
Lenovo Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	57 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	37 fps -35%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	24 fps -58%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	105 fps +67%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	93 fps +48%
Lenovo Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	63 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	41 fps -35%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	25 fps -60%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	45 fps +22%
Lenovo Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	37 fps
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	35 fps -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	21 fps -43%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	16 fps -57%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62 fps +55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	47 fps +18%
Lenovo Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	22 fps -45%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	16 fps -60%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	33 fps +38%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	24 fps 0%
Lenovo Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	24 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps -42%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	9.5 fps -60%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	46 fps +77%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	34 fps +31%
Lenovo Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	26 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps -42%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	9.8 fps -62%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps +36%
Lenovo Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11 fps -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	7.5 fps -46%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	5.7 fps -59%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	23 fps +53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps +27%
Lenovo Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.1 fps -46%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	6.1 fps -59%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps +38%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9.4 fps 0%
Lenovo Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.4 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.3 fps -44%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5 fps -47%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	3.7 fps -61%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11.2 fps +87%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.2 fps +37%
Lenovo Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	3.3 fps -45%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	3.3 fps -45%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	2.3 fps -62%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	21 fps +40%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	15 fps 0%
Lenovo Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	9 fps -40%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.3 fps -45%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	5.8 fps -61%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	31 fps +94%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps +38%
Lenovo Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	9.8 fps -39%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.9 fps -44%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	6.2 fps -61%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4.8 fps +92%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.6 fps +44%
Lenovo Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2.5 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1.4 fps -44%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1.4 fps -44%
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	0.98 fps -61%

使用 Tab Plus 上网速度非常快。网页加载迅速，显示无明显延迟。在浏览器基准测试中，联想平板电脑名列前茅。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years)	108.7 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)	96.598 Points +19%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)	88.235 Points +9%
Lenovo Tab Plus (Chrome 126.0.6478.122)	80.918 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (46.9 - 80.9, n=9)	66.5 Points -18%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)	56.281 Points -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	52.9 Points -35%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)	107 Points +20%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=68, last 2 years)	104.3 Points +17%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)	95 Points +7%
Lenovo Tab Plus (Chrome 126.0.6478.122)	89 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (39 - 89, n=9)	69.6 Points -22%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)	60 Points -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	57 Points -36%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years)	149.6 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)	144 Points +33%
Honor Pad 9	132 Points +22%
Lenovo Tab Plus (Chrome 126.0.6478.122)	108 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (80 - 112, n=8)	95.4 Points -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	93 Points -14%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years)	115.5 runs/min +43%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)	86.6 runs/min +7%
Lenovo Tab Plus (Chrome 126.0.6478.122)	80.7 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)	71.6 runs/min -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	53.5 runs/min -34%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (24.1 - 80.7, n=9)	52.5 runs/min -35%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)	44.4 runs/min -45%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)	32436 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)	29301 Points +18%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)	28653 Points +15%
Lenovo Tab Plus (Chrome 126.0.6478.122)	24857 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (17228 - 25005, n=17)	20999 Points -16%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)	15304 Points -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 120)	14279 Points -43%
Lenovo Tab M11 (Chrome 124)	13413 Points -46%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years)	3789 ms * -127%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	2650.1 ms * -59%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)	2592 ms * -55%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1671 - 2444, n=9)	2058 ms * -23%
Lenovo Tab Plus (Chrome 126.0.6478.122)	1670.9 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)	1352.9 ms * +19%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)	1321.1 ms * +21%

* ... smaller is better

在同价位产品中，联想 Tab Plus 的 UFS 2.2 存储系统是个例外，因此可以确保极短的加载时间。除了 Honor Pad 9采用了更快的 UFS 3.1 闪存外，其他同类设备在写入和读取吞吐量方面都远远落后于我们的测试机型。

	Lenovo Tab Plus	Honor Pad 9	Lenovo Tab M11	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	Teclast T60	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		42%	-63%	-42%	-72%	-59%	-25%	-12%
Sequential Read 256KB	991.99	1921.34 94%	294.5 -70%	485.96 -51%	240.4 -76%	297.47 -70%	728 ?(303 - 1038, n=71) -27%	1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years) 5%
Sequential Write 256KB	837.52	1222.83 46%	256.9 -69%	476.37 -43%	230 -73%	228.97 -73%	527 ?(103.2 - 903, n=71) -37%	684 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years) -18%
Random Read 4KB	240.56	256.06 6%	95.6 -60%	130.67 -46%	76.4 -68%	102.41 -57%	191.7 ?(89.3 - 297, n=71) -20%	189.2 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years) -21%
Random Write 4KB	221.09	266.17 20%	101.2 -54%	162.9 -26%	67.5 -69%	146.92 -34%	185.8 ?(62.6 - 419, n=71) -16%	189.5 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years) -14%

游戏 - 运行流畅

虽然联想 Tab Plus 不是游戏机，但偶尔玩玩游戏还是没问题的。不过，你必须愿意降低图形细节，否则它很快就会变得卡顿。

不过，使用低细节设置，即使是要求较高的游戏也能玩得很开心--例如《源氏冲击》。在我们的测试场景中，这款奇幻动作 RPG 游戏在平板电脑上的平均显示帧数为每秒 43.6 帧，非常令人满意。在运行《PUBG Mobile》时，高清图形设置--也就是 Tab Plus 提供的最高设置--几乎始终保持每秒 30 帧。在《PUBGMobile》的最低细节级别 "Liquid "下，Tab Plus 甚至能达到几乎稳定的 40 帧/秒。

我们使用Gamebench测试工具来确定游戏帧率。

Lenovo Tab Plus; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 4.7.0_23093867_23435602: Ø43.6 (37-53)

Lenovo Tab Plus; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 4.7.0_23093867_23435602: Ø23.9 (10-33)

Lenovo Tab Plus; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.2.0: Ø39.5 (36-41)

Lenovo Tab Plus; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.2.0: Ø29.8 (27-31)

排放 - 令人印象深刻的声音

温度

在测试过程中，联想 Tab Plus 没有出现发热问题。即使在使用 Burnout 基准进行了 1 小时的压力测试后，我们在平板电脑表面测得的最高温度也只有 36 °C。即使在最糟糕的情况下，温度也没有超过温热。

3DMark 压力测试表明，平板电脑无需通过内部节流来保持较低的工作温度。在 Wild Life 压力测试中，即使在运行了 20 次之后，它仍然能像开始时一样快速渲染测试场景。

Max. Load

Idle


36 °C	33.3 °C	29.7 °C
32.4 °C	30.6 °C	29.1 °C
32 °C	29.4 °C	29.2 °C

Maximum: 36 °C
Average: 31.3 °C


30.1 °C	35.2 °C	33.8 °C
29.7 °C	31.9 °C	31.9 °C
29.4 °C	29.2 °C	30.5 °C

Maximum: 35.2 °C
Average: 31.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Lenovo Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.46 (7.45-7.48)

Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.1 (14.1-14.1)

Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.22 (4.19-4.23)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.26 (7.23-7.27)

Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.87 (2.85-2.87)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.5 (3.49-3.5)

Lenovo Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.08 (2.06-2.09)

Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø3.65 (3.65-3.66)

Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø1.088 (1.072-1.097)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.16 (2.14-2.16)

Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.787 (0.742-0.833)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.726 (0.72-0.741)

Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.3 (14.2-14.3)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.52 (3.52-3.53)

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Honor Pad 9	99.5 (3.65^min - 3.66^max) % +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	99 (2.14^min - 2.16^max) % 0%
Lenovo Tab Plus	99 (2.06^min - 2.09^max) %
Lenovo Tab M11	97.8 (1.072^min - 1.097^max) % -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	97.3 (0.72^min - 0.741^max) % -2%
Teclast T60	89.1 (0.742^min - 0.833^max) % -10%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor Pad 9	99.7 (14.1^min - 14.1^max) % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	99.6 (3.49^min - 3.5^max) % 0%
Lenovo Tab Plus	99.6 (7.45^min - 7.48^max) %
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	99.5 (7.23^min - 7.27^max) % 0%
Teclast T60	99.4 (2.85^min - 2.87^max) % 0%
Lenovo Tab M11	98.9 (4.19^min - 4.23^max) % -1%
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	99.9 (3.52^min - 3.53^max) %
Honor Pad 9	99.3 (14.2^min - 14.3^max) %

Legend

Lenovo Tab Plus Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 710, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Lenovo Tab M11 Mediatek Helio G88, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Teclast T60 Unisoc T7255, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB eMMC Flash

发言人

联想 Tab Plus 的功能亮点是它的八个兼容杜比全景声（Dolby Atmos）的 JBL 扬声器，总输出功率为 26 瓦，分别位于两个短边。其中四个扬声器负责低音，另外四个负责高音。

在音质方面，Tab Plus 远远胜过竞争对手，它能发出非常平衡、饱满的声音，低音很轻，能让整个房间充满声音，即使在最大音量下也不会失真。通常只有昂贵得多的平板电脑（如 Apple iPad Pro配备四个扬声器。

如果将智能手机与平板电脑配对（支持蓝牙 5.2），它就可以作为外置扬声器使用。此外，你还可以将耳机直接连接到它的 3.5 毫米插孔。Tab Plus 支持当前的蓝牙编解码器，如 SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、LDAC 和 LC3。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Lenovo Tab Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 节俭的联想平板电脑

耗电量

联想 Tab Plus 运行非常节能。在空闲模式下，它的平均耗电量为 1.6 瓦，而在负载模式下，它的最大耗电量仅为 5.7 瓦。相比之下，其他设备的耗电量要高得多。只有 Teclast T60的空闲功耗与 Tab Plus 类似低。

联想平板电脑的 8600 毫安时电池充电功率可达 45 瓦。你必须自己寻找合适的电源，因为它的供货范围中并不包括电源。

在测试过程中，当连接到 100 瓦的 Anker 317 电源装置时，Tab Plus 可以利用其最大充电容量，并在 1:11 小时内快速完成一个完整的充电周期。46 分钟后达到 80%，53 分钟后达到 90%。最后一次充电需要近 10 分钟。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.2 / 1.6 / 1.8 Watt
Load	3.7 / 5.7 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Lenovo Tab Plus 8600 mAh	Honor Pad 9 8300 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ 7040 mAh	Teclast T60 8000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8000 mAh
Power Consumption		-228%	-116%	-13%	-104%
Idle Minimum *	1.2	1.5 -25%	1 17%	1.2 -0%	0.63 47%
Idle Average *	1.6	8.39 -424%	4.76 -198%	1.4 12%	4.25 -166%
Idle Maximum *	1.8	8.46 -370%	4.79 -166%	1.7 6%	4.34 -141%
Load Average *	3.7	11.65 -215%	9.52 -157%	4.2 -14%	10.24 -177%
Load Maximum *	5.7	11.67 -105%	9.92 -74%	9.5 -67%	10.47 -84%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Lenovo Tab Plus Mediatek Helio G99: Ø3.18 (1.208-5.68)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G: Ø4.05 (1.974-6.6)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G: Ø3.52 (1.674-7.23)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Lenovo Tab Plus Mediatek Helio G99; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.39 (1.565-3.78)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.41 (4.18-4.71)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.97 (2.43-3.19)

Lenovo Tab Plus Mediatek Helio G99; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.284 (1.158-1.84)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.02 (1.986-2.31)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.74 (1.672-2.5)

运行时间

良好的能源管理有助于 Tab Plus 实现较长的电池续航时间。模拟网上冲浪可持续约 24 小时，连续循环播放高清视频可持续 18 小时以上。三星三星Galaxy Tab A9+是它最强劲的竞争对手之一，但它的电池容量为 7040 毫安时，这意味着它的默认电池容量较小。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		44h 17min
WiFi Websurfing		24h 10min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		18h 33min
Load (maximum brightness)		6h 07min

	Lenovo Tab Plus 8600 mAh	Honor Pad 9 8300 mAh	Lenovo Tab M11 7040 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ 7040 mAh	Teclast T60 8000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-54%	-38%	-28%	-7%	-5%
Reader / Idle	2657			2275 -14%	3313 25%	4236 59%
H.264	1113			800 -28%	1145 3%	997 -10%
WiFi v1.3	1450	661 -54%	896 -38%	920 -37%	1096 -24%	1017 -30%
Load	367			243 -34%	249 -32%	231 -37%

Pros

+ 高品质外壳，带脚架

+ 运行时间长

+ 超凡音效

+ 3.5 毫米耳机插孔

+ 性能稳定

+ 90 赫兹显示屏

+ 支持手写笔

Cons

- 无手机版本

- 无指纹传感器

- 供货范围不包括电源

- 相对较重

联想 Tab Plus 的评价

联想 Tab Plus 是一款出色的多媒体平板电脑，尤其是它的音效令人难以置信。得益于由 8 个扬声器组成的音响系统，Tab Plus 营造出了美妙的音效体验，而这种体验通常只能在昂贵得多的平板电脑上才能听到。甚至有些蓝牙扬声器的音效都比它差。

高品质的外壳、超长的运行时间、至少 128 GB 的存储空间以及对比度极高的 90Hz 显示屏，都使它成为目前市场上价格低于 300 美元的最佳平板电脑之一。

如果你在购买平板电脑时不想破费，但又不想在音质上打折扣，那么联想 Tab Plus 可能是你不错的选择。

Tab Plus 绝非性能奇迹。即便如此，其搭载的 MedaTek Helio G99的性能足以胜任多媒体应用和大多数日常使用场景。只要降低细节设置，这款平板电脑还能运行一些游戏。此外，考虑到可选配的手写笔和操作系统功能（如分割窗口视图），Tab Plus 作为一款生产型平板电脑的表现也相当不错。

联想 Tab Plus 的 IPS 面板最大亮度稍差，这在很大程度上限制了它在室内的使用。在室内使用时，你可以使用方便的脚架将它支撑起来，不过，它的重量超过 600 克，相当沉重。

联想 Tab Plus 的替代产品包括 Honor Pad 9, 三星Galaxy Tab A9+和小米红米 Pad SE.虽然它们的音质不如我们的测试机，但其他功能都非常相似。

价格和供应情况

联想 Tab Plus 的最高售价为 289.99 美元，但目前尚未在美国上市。您可以通过联想网站查看和订购联想的所有产品。

请注意：我们更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息请点击此处.

Lenovo Tab Plus - 07/30/2024 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

86 / 98 → 87%

Keyboard

71 / 80 → 89%

Pointing Device

89%

Connectivity

39 / 69 → 56%

Weight

81 / 40-88 → 84%

Battery

94%

Display

76%

Games Performance

5 / 65 → 8%

Application Performance

57 / 92 → 62%

AI Performance

25%

Temperature

94%

Noise

100%

Audio

86 / 91 → 94%

Camera

58 / 90 → 65%

Average

70%

78%

Tablet - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
86.7%

Materials
50%

Packaging
100%

Power Use
95.7%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
56.7%

Total Sustainability Score: 71.5%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.