Notebookcheck Logo

Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G 智能手机评测--高像素，高性能

弱者

Tecno 推出 Camon 30 Premier 5G 的主要目的是以出色的拍照性能为其加分。但其他功能也令人印象深刻：最新的处理器、充足的存储空间、120 Hz LTPO AMOLED 显示屏。我们近距离观察了这款奇特的设备。
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Tecno 在德语国家相对默默无闻，但在其他市场却拥有强大的影响力。除智能手机外，该公司还提供笔记本电脑、耳机和智能手表。Tecno 有五个不同系列的智能手机。在 Camon 系列中，重点是相机性能。

目前的 Camon 系列被称为 Camon 30，包括四款不同的设备：Camon 30、Camon 30 5G、Camon 30 Pro 5G 和 Camon 30 Premier 5G。我们测试的是带有 Premier 后缀的顶级型号。

Camon 30 Premier 只有一种配置，即 512 GB 内存和 12 GB 内存。可选颜色为阿尔卑斯雪银色和夏威夷熔岩黑，这两种颜色的机背均为 "素皮"。Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G 未在德国正式销售。

Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra 8 x 2 - 3.1 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G610 MP6
Memory
12 GB 
Display
6.77 inch 19.79:9, 2780 x 1264 pixel 451 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 490 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Flicker-Sensor, Proximity Sensor, Electronic compass, Gyroscope, Infrared Remote Control, OTG
Networking
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7902 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, E-GSM900 (880-915 MHz, 925-960 MHz), DCS1800 (1710-1785 MHz, 1805-1880 MHz), WCDMA (Band 1,8), LTE (Band 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 42), NR (N 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78), ENDC (1-N1/1-N3/1-N7/1-N20/1-N28/1-N38/1-N40/1-N41/ 1-N77/1-N78, 3-N1/3-N3/3-N7/3-N20/3-N28/3-N38/3-N40/3-N41/ 3-N77/3-N78, 7-N1/7-N3/7-N7/7-N20/7-N28/7-N40/7-N77/7-N78, 8-N1/8-N3/8-N7/8-N38/8-N40/8-N41/8-N77/8-N78, 20-N1/20-N3/20-N7/20-N38/20-N40/20-N41/20-N77/ 20-N78, 28-N1/28-N3/28-N7/28-N38/28-N40/28-N41/28-N77/ 28-N78, 38-N78, 40-N28/40-N41/40-N40/40-N77/40-N78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 162.66 x 76.23
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (IMX890, F/1.88, 1.0 μm pixel size, OIS) + 50 MPix (114° Ultrawide/Makro) + 50 MPix (3x Tele)
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix Eye-tracking
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: onscreen, Keyboard Light: yes, Case, Charger, USB-Cable (USB-A to USB-C), Screen-Protector, SIM-Needle, HiOS 14.0, 13 Months Warranty, SAR-Head: 0.79 W/kg, SAR-Body: 1.34 W/Kg, Camera2API: Full, fanless
Weight
215 g, Power Supply: 123 g
Links
Tecno homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
81.1 %
06 / 2024
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6		215 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.77"2780x1264
87.4 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530		213 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.60"2340x1080
86 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2023
Honor 90 5G
SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644		183 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2664x1200
87.4 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2024
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4		204.5 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2712x1220
87.6 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
SD 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720		186 g512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.70"2712x1220

Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G 采用金属边框。它采用 6.77 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏，由康宁大猩猩 5 号玻璃保护。机身背面是一个巨大的摄像头驼峰，明显突出于机身外壳。不仅驼峰突出，整个智能手机的顶部也变得更厚。

按键有很好的受力点，在外壳中没有任何晃动。根据 IP54 标准，该设备具有防尘防水功能。背面的设计非常独特，制造商称它让人联想到经典相机。作为一个特殊的元素，还有一个用于通知的红灯。纯素皮革采用哑光处理，手感略微柔软。

尺寸比较

❌
162.66 mm 76.23 mm 7.9 mm 215 g161.4 mm 74.2 mm 8.9 mm 204.5 g161.9 mm 74.1 mm 7.8 mm 183 g161.2 mm 72.4 mm 8.2 mm 186 g161.1 mm 77.4 mm 8.2 mm 213 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

特点 - Tecno 配备 12GB RAM，但不带 eSIM 卡

Tecno 为 Camon 30 Premier 5G 选择了高档设备。其中包括 联发科 Dimensity 8200 Ultimate配备 12GB RAM，可通过软件进一步扩展至 12GB。图形处理器为 ARM Mali-G610 MP6图形处理器。该设备还支持双卡双待，有两张实体 SIM 卡；不支持 eSIM 卡。

Camon 30 Premier 5G 支持 NFC 和红外爆破器。遗憾的是，USB-C 端口仅支持 USB 2.0。与三星 980 Pro 结合使用时，我们的数据传输速率达到了 39.57 MB/s。该设备支持 exFAT 格式的外部存储介质，但不支持 NTFS。

无法通过 microSD 扩展内存，也没有插孔连接。如果通过线缆连接耳机，Camon 可用作 FM 收音机。

底部：扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM 卡插槽
底部：扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM 卡插槽
左：音量按钮
左：音量按钮
右：电源按钮
右：电源按钮
顶部：扬声器、麦克风、红外爆破器
顶部：扬声器、麦克风、红外爆破器

软件 - Camon 30 Premier 更新周期短

Tecno 依靠Android 和名为 HiOS 的自有界面。该设备随Android 14 和 HiOS 14 一起交付。在测试时，Android 安全补丁是从 2024 年 2 月开始的。令人欣慰的是，这款智能手机没有臃肿的软件。只预装了制造商提供的应用程序和谷歌软件。除软件外，还占用了 21.7 GB 的空间。

与许多其他制造商不同，Tecno 在主屏幕上从左到右滑动时不提供谷歌地图，而是提供各种集合和概览。内存使用情况、体能值和常用应用程序都会在出厂前显示。

其他特殊功能包括 "动态端口"，这是 Tecno 对Apple 动态岛的诠释。前置摄像头周围可以显示各种动画。此外还有浮动窗口和 "智能面板"。它可以随时折叠出来，并提供对系统建议的其他有用应用程序的访问。

该软件还可用于指定背面 LED 灯亮起的场景。不过，选择范围有限。Camon-30 系列将接收Android 15 和 16。制造商还承诺提供三年的安全更新。但没有关于更新间隔的信息。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - Camon 30，6 千兆赫频段

Camon 30 Premier 5G 支持 WiFi 6E，因此也支持 6 GHz 频段。与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 搭配使用时，传输效果非常好。虽然在测试中出现了个别掉线现象，但都是小问题。总体而言，传输值处于较高水平，优于对比设备。

在日常使用中，上传和下载速度很快，没有任何问题。移动接收也没有问题。智能手机在许多地方都能建立 5G 连接。如果需要，传输值可以显示在状态栏中。

Networking
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
952 (min: 748) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
989 (min: 505) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1016 (min: 998) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1011 (min: 988) MBit/s ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
823 (min: 704) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
735 (min: 671) MBit/s ∼74%
Honor 90 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
910 (min: 839) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
939 (min: 470) MBit/s ∼95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
848 (min: 445) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
881 (min: 669) MBit/s ∼89%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1600 (min: 1384) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1081 (min: 838) MBit/s ∼79%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1368 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼100%
055110165220275330385440495550605660715770825880935990Tooltip
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, ARM Mali-G610 MP6; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1016 (998-1028)
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, ARM Mali-G610 MP6; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1001 (988-1017)
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, ARM Mali-G610 MP6; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø943 (748-985)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Samsung Xclipse 530; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø822 (704-841)
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, ARM Mali-G610 MP6; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø972 (505-1030)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Samsung Xclipse 530; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø735 (671-791)
全球导航卫星系统测试：室内
全球导航卫星系统测试：室内
全球导航卫星系统测试：室外
全球导航卫星系统测试：室外

我们带着 Camon 30 Premier 5G 进行了一次自行车旅行。总的来说，这款设备给我们留下了深刻印象，除了一个偏差之外，它的跟踪非常准确。

在日常使用中，使用谷歌地图导航也没有任何问题。这款智能手机支持所有常见的双频卫星系统，还能支持 SBAS。

全球导航卫星系统测试：环湖航行
全球导航卫星系统测试：环湖航行
全球导航卫星系统测试：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试：总结
全球导航卫星系统测试：总结

通话和语音质量 - Tecno 仍有潜力可挖

Tecno 依靠自己的软件开发手机应用。该应用拥有通话列表、联系人和数字键盘，简单而不失特色。一个特别的功能是通话录音选项，但对方不会被告知录音内容。

对于 Camon 30 Premier 5G 的用户来说，音质非常好。扬声器音量大，声音清晰悦耳。不过，对对方的噪音抑制还可以改进。对方会听到所有背景噪音，几乎就像通过扬声器打电话一样。如果使用免提功能，传输过程会有轻微的混响。

相机 - Camon 30 Premier 的四倍 5000 万像素

与 Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G 自拍。
与 Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G 自拍。

Tecno 在 Camon 系列中重点关注摄像头。这不仅体现在背面的大尺寸设计上，还体现在内置的四个传感器上，每个传感器的分辨率都达到了 50MPix。主摄像头采用索尼 IMX890。

除主摄像头外，Tecno 还安装了一个超广角摄像头和一个三倍光学变焦的潜望式摄像头。Tecno 还依靠专用芯片（索尼 CXD5622GG）进行图像处理，这应能确保更好的效果，尤其是在夜景拍摄时。

实际上，在强光下的图像和视频效果尤为出色。图像具有良好的动态范围，清晰度极高。超广角摄像头还可用于微距拍摄，效果令人印象深刻。变焦镜头也有不错的效果，但与数字放大相结合，清晰度明显下降。

在光线不足的情况下，图像仍可使用，但清晰度已大打折扣。所有镜头都能以最高 4K 和 60 FPS 的速度拍摄视频。视频防抖动功能、自动对焦功能和光照调节功能均运行良好。

前置摄像头的分辨率也达到了 5000 万像素。人像拍摄通常比较可靠，但个别头发的拍摄会将软件推向极限。总的来说，这款相机提供了许多软件功能，如 "超级夜景模式"、延时摄影、慢动作、人像 AI 效果和增强现实。此外，还提供专业模式，可手动选择曝光时间、ISO、白平衡和对焦。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide-angle5x ZoomLow Light
ColorChecker
5.2 ∆E
2 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
3 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
6 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G: 4.44 ∆E min: 1.26 - max: 9.53 ∆E
ColorChecker
17.4 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
17 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
28 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G: 19.31 ∆E min: 9.78 - max: 28.02 ∆E

配件和保修 - Tecno 提供保护套和快速充电器

Camon 30 Premier 5G 的供货范围很大。出厂时在显示屏上贴了一层保护膜。包装盒里还有另一层更厚的保护膜、一个做工精良的包装盒和一个 70 瓦的电源适配器及配套线缆。

我们的测试设备还与无线入耳式耳机 Tecno Earphones BD03 捆绑在一起。Tecno 为设备提供 13 个月的保修服务。制造商不提供延长保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - Camon 30 Premier 的快速面部识别功能

Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G 采用了谷歌键盘。这意味着输入时不会出现错误，甚至在空白区域的输入也能可靠地执行。通过软件可以激活各种手势。例如，可以通过手指在已关闭的显示屏上滑动来控制音乐，而且效果可靠。但没有单手模式。

出厂时在显示屏上贴了一层保护膜。不过，滑动性能还是不错的。不过，保护膜容易沾染指纹，显示屏的过渡也很明显。Camon 30 Premier 5G 可以通过 2D 面部识别和显示屏上的光学指纹传感器解锁。传感器的定位很好，在测试中能快速、可靠地工作。人脸识别的工作速度更快。即使在光线条件不好的情况下也能快速解锁，而且可以跳过锁屏。

Tecno 使用自己的语音助手 - Ella。不过，它不支持德语作为系统语言。电源按钮很容易触及。音量调节按钮位于左侧，位置较高。X 轴振动电机噪音小，声音清脆悦耳。

显示屏 - 相比之下，Camon 30 缺乏亮度

子像素结构
子像素结构

Tecno 在 Camon 30 Premier 5G 中使用了一块 6.77 英寸 AMOLED LTPO 面板，最大刷新率为 120 Hz。据制造商称，这是该公司历史上最好的显示屏。在日常使用中，该面板以良好的可视角度和流畅的滚动给人留下了深刻印象。

与其他设备相比，如 三星Galaxy A55 5G或 小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G相比之下，这个价位的手机显然有更好的显示屏。我们在 Tecno 手机上测得的最大亮度为 801 cd/m²。而三星智能手机的亮度略低于 1000 尼特，小米甚至超过了 1200 cd/m²。通过 APL18 和 HDR 测量，我们达到了 Tecno 的最高亮度。在没有环境光传感器的情况下，我们可以确定亮度为 578 尼特。

在测试过程中，我们还注意到屏幕闪烁。不过，频率相当高，为 365 Hz。Camon 30 Premier 5G 还提供一种特殊的 PWM 调光模式，可将频率提高到 2160 赫兹。

软件提供了 "永远在线 "显示选项。不过，该功能名不副实，因为显示屏会在短时间后再次消失。

794
cd/m²		792
cd/m²		781
cd/m²
797
cd/m²		789
cd/m²		788
cd/m²
801
cd/m²		792
cd/m²		790
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 801 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 791.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3.42 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 789 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8"		Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"		Honor 90 5G
AMOLED, 2664x1200, 6.7"		Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"		Motorola Edge 50 Pro
P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Screen
10%
-4%
31%
14%
Brightness middle
789
962
22%
1180
50%
1240
57%
1064
35%
Brightness
792
967
22%
1202
52%
1233
56%
1038
31%
Brightness Distribution
98
99
1%
88
-10%
98
0%
88
-10%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.2
1.6
-33%
1.5
-25%
1.1
8%
1.17
2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.1
2.6
16%
4.8
-55%
2.2
29%
2.47
20%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.1
1.5
29%
2.8
-33%
1.4
33%
2
5%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.13 103%
2.25 98%
2.21 100%
2.238 98%
CCT
6634 98%
6382 102%
6489 100%
6669 97%
6423 101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 365 Hz
Amplitude: 20 %

The display backlight flickers at 365 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 365 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列 (虽然最小亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平缓，但这是由于缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可在信息框中查看)

在色彩还原方面，Tecno 也不是同类产品中的佼佼者。显示效果还不错，但在黄色和橙色方面存在偏差。 三星Galaxy A 55 5G和 小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G的色彩更为真实。

色彩保真度（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩保真度（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6495 ms rise
↘ 0.601 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.408 ms rise
↘ 0.3955 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G 有一个软件模式，旨在使显示屏在阳光下更加明亮。在日常使用中，该设备在阳光下仍可阅读，但希望亮度能更高一些。

Tecno 智能手机的可视角度令人印象深刻。

性能 - Camon 30 Premier 在图形性能方面独占鳌头

Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G 配备了 联发科 Dimensity 8200 UltimateSoC 芯片。这款智能手机的日常性能非常出色。配合 12GB RAM，应用程序可以快速打开，并能在后台长时间保持打开状态。

Tecno 主要在基准测试中表现出色。在某些情况下，Camon 30 Premier 5G 在测试设备中处于领先地位，而在其他情况下则处于中游。Dimensity 8200 Ultimate 在大多数基准测试中的表现略好于 Dimensity 7200 Ultimate。 Dimensity 7200在 小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G.不过，它在 UL Procyon AI Inference forAndroid 中的表现更好。Tecno 智能手机仅在 Geekbench 6.2 基准测试中表现出人意料的糟糕。

Camon 30 Premier 5G 的内存不仅大，而且速度快。AndroBench 的测量值在所有方面都非常出色。

Geekbench 6.3 | Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=161, last 2 years)
1446 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
1157 Points +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
1147 Points +17%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
1147 Points +17%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
1119 Points +14%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
  (981 - 1252, n=2)
1117 Points +14%
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
981 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=161, last 2 years)
4028 Points +22%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
  (3295 - 4034, n=2)
3665 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
3456 Points +5%
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
3295 Points
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
3261 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
3129 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
2715 Points -18%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
  (1012 - 1018, n=2)
1015 Points 0%
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
1012 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)
995 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
891 Points -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
887 Points -12%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
826 Points -18%
Multi-Core
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
3914 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
  (3833 - 3914, n=2)
3874 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
3349 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)
3312 Points -15%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
3094 Points -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
2521 Points -36%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=98, last 2 years)
1232320 Points +28%
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
960442 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
  (947949 - 960442, n=2)
954196 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
767738 Points -20%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
767395 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
740935 Points -23%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
714232 Points -26%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
714232 Points -26%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
15165 Points +2%
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
14880 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
  (13966 - 14880, n=2)
14423 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
13393 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years)
12976 Points -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
12313 Points -17%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
12265 Points -18%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1517, n=157, last 2 years)
884 Points +13%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
  (784 - 872, n=2)
828 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
784 Points 0%
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
784 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
759 Points -3%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
704 Points -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
686 Points -12%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)
6297 Points +22%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
6028 Points +17%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
  (5164 - 5971, n=2)
5568 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
5192 Points +1%
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
5164 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
4964 Points -4%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
4296 Points -17%
System
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
11778 Points +40%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
11239 Points +34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)
10163 Points +21%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
  (8407 - 11727, n=2)
10067 Points +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
9366 Points +11%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
8634 Points +3%
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
8407 Points
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)
6767 Points +40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
5847 Points +21%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
5719 Points +18%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
  (4837 - 6298, n=2)
5568 Points +15%
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
4837 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
4109 Points -15%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
3640 Points -25%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)
16908 Points +42%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
13308 Points +12%
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
11895 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
  (11101 - 11895, n=2)
11498 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
10386 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
8511 Points -28%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
8150 Points -31%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)
1564 Points +6%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
1543 Points +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
  (1470 - 1550, n=2)
1510 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
1474 Points 0%
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
1470 Points
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
1330 Points -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
1278 Points -13%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
28870 Points +2%
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
28292 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
  (26303 - 28292, n=2)
27298 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 74958, n=143, last 2 years)
16841 Points -40%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
8985 Points -68%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
7374 Points -74%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
5205 Points -82%
AImark - Score v3.x
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
46207 Points +88%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=135, last 2 years)
25873 Points +5%
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
24591 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
  (22237 - 24591, n=2)
23414 Points -5%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
717 Points -97%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
585 Points -98%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
Points -100%

显卡为 Mali-G610 MP6.这使得 Camon 30 Premier 5G 可以流畅运行最新的高分辨率游戏。在超高刷新率的超 HDR 下，可以流畅地玩《PUBG Mobile》。

因此，这款 Tecno 智能手机在图形基准测试中遥遥领先。而 小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G仍能在一定程度上跟上 三星Galaxy A55 5G和 Honor 90 5G远远落在后面。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1693 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1451 Points -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1202 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
915 Points -46%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
854 Points -50%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1715 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1474 Points -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1191 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
926 Points -46%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
854 Points -50%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6250 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5434 Points -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4483 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3992 Points -36%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3137 Points -50%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6352 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4752 Points -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4336 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3897 Points -39%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3146 Points -50%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5850 Points +5%
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5558 Points
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4501 Points -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3833 Points -31%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10832 Points
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7388 Points -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7275 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7170 Points -34%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8946 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6828 Points -24%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6466 Points -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6065 Points -32%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
116 fps -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
114 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps -7%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
294 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
191 fps -35%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
174 fps -41%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
158 fps -46%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
134 fps -54%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
94 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps -14%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
78 fps -17%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -36%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps +3%
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
108 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
107 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95 fps -12%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94 fps -13%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
74 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps -19%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps -23%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps -30%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
98 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
84 fps -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73 fps -26%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps -32%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
41 fps
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps -24%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps -24%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -30%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -43%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
33 fps
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps -18%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps -21%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps -30%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -39%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18 fps -42%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49 fps
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -14%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps -22%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -24%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
77 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps -30%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps -36%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.5 fps -32%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7.9 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7.9 fps -44%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
131.393 Points +28%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)
120.4 Points +17%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126)
118.202 Points +15%
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G (chrome 125)
102.97 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra (96.2 - 103, n=2)
99.6 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)
83.784 Points -19%
Honor 90 5G (chrome 115)
64.3 Points -38%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min +22%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
116 runs/min +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)
112 runs/min 0%
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G (chrome 125)
112 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra (112 - 112, n=2)
112 runs/min 0%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126)
110 runs/min -2%
Honor 90 5G (chrome 115)
61.8 runs/min -45%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
126 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=152, last 2 years)
113.8 Points +4%
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G (chrome 125)
109 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra (107 - 109, n=2)
108 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126)
106 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)
86 Points -21%
Honor 90 5G (Chrome 115)
58 Points -47%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
135 Points +11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra (122 - 123, n=2)
122.5 Points 0%
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G (Chrome 125)
122 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)
92 Points -25%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
41576 Points +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)
39060 Points +11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra (35231 - 42222, n=2)
38727 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points +5%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126)
36202 Points +3%
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G (chrome 125)
35231 Points
Honor 90 5G (chrome 115)
21143 Points -40%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Honor 90 5G (chrome 115)
2686.1 ms * -120%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)
1296.2 ms * -6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra (1222 - 1233, n=2)
1227 ms * -0%
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G (chrome 125)
1221.5 ms *
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126)
1090.6 ms * +11%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
1012.6 ms * +17%

* ... smaller is better

Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5GSamsung Galaxy A55 5GHonor 90 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5GMotorola Edge 50 ProAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-33%
-23%
-16%
-25%
48%
-17%
Sequential Read 256KB
1850.76
1688.53
-9%
1831.4
-1%
1921.64
4%
1023.6
-45%
3622 ?(1851 - 4512, n=31)
96%
1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years)
-1%
Sequential Write 256KB
1727.3
831.44
-52%
1444.1
-16%
1702.4
-1%
1025.9
-41%
2956 ?(1524 - 3678, n=31)
71%
1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years)
-18%
Random Read 4KB
354.51
351.47
-1%
226.5
-36%
248.21
-30%
337
-5%
392 ?(250 - 480, n=31)
11%
277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years)
-22%
Random Write 4KB
420.96
132.11
-69%
260
-38%
265.29
-37%
390.2
-7%
475 ?(45.7 - 709, n=31)
13%
309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years)
-27%
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 4.7.0d: Ø58.3 (5-61)
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 4.7.0d: Ø59.2 (48-61)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Dead Trigger 2; 1.10.5: Ø117.6 (87-121)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø55.5 (44-61)
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Genshin Impact; medium 120 fps; 4.7.0_23093867_23435602: Ø34.8 (3-37)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Genshin Impact; medium 120 fps: Ø46.1 (21-61)
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 4.7.0_23093867_23435602: Ø57.4 (40-61)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø42.4 (26-57)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø57.3 (41-61)
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 3.2.0: Ø50.9 (6-61)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø39.9 (36-41)
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.2.0: Ø39.1 (21-42)

排放 - Tecno Camon 30 Premier（带节流功能

温度 - Camon 30 Premier 在负载情况下会发热

在日常使用中，Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G 仍能保持舒适的温度。在长时间观看电影和玩游戏时，智能手机会明显发热。在极端负载的情况下，我们测得顶部的最高温度为 42.3 摄氏度。背面的最高温度为 40.8 摄氏度。

Max. Load
 41.9 °C41.6 °C39.9 °C 
 42.2 °C42.3 °C39.7 °C 
 42.1 °C41.1 °C39.8 °C 
Maximum: 42.3 °C
Average: 41.2 °C
35.2 °C39.6 °C40.1 °C
37.8 °C40 °C39.8 °C
38.8 °C39.8 °C40.8 °C
Maximum: 40.8 °C
Average: 39.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  27.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.7 % +9%
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91.7 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.9 % +4%
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
95.2 %
05101520253035Tooltip
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø10.3 (9.96-10.5)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.59 (5.56-5.63)
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø37.6 (34.8-38)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø23.1 (23.1-23.1)
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø37.7 (37.6-37.8)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø23.7 (23.6-23.7)

扬声器 - 使用 Camon 30 Premier 的杜比全景声

Tecno 在 Camon 30 Premier 5G 中安装了立体声扬声器，该设备还通过了杜比全景声（Dolby Atmos）认证。声音令人愉悦。中音和高音尤其清晰、平衡。智能手机的音量也很大，达到 92.9 分贝。在最大音量时，背面会有振动，尤其是在向摄像头驼峰过渡时。

Tecno 智能手机没有插孔输出。不过，在测试过程中，我们可以顺利配对蓝牙耳机。Camon 30 Premier 5G 支持以下编解码器：SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、LDAC、LC3、Opus、LHDC V3 和 LHDC V5。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.942.62532.445.83128.141.54031.341.65029.341.76321.947.28017.647.710025.147.412516.749.716017.651.820017.752.725014.855.831512.258.140011.159.750012.466.563011.668.180012.27510001479.7125012.880.7160012.878.6200012.879.5250013.579.7315013.582.2400014.483.8500014.185.9630013.683.1800013.578.91000013.676.51250014.272.71600013.869.2SPL25.592.9N0.794.4median 13.6median 76.5Delta1.210.227.333.426.235.525.938.429.240.335.642.325.935.822.14117.840.517.146.518.157.414.255.214.15610.758.61159.312.863.711.164.61271.111.774.71279.312.877.412.479.512.379.713.3821384.213.581.613.278.913.878.213.776.113.469.313.360.624.991.40.685.1median 13.2median 74.719.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseTecno Camon 30 Premier 5GSamsung Galaxy A55 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - Camon 30 Premier 在休息时非常省电

耗电量

Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G 的待机功耗采用了 联发科 Dimensity 8200 Ultimate略低于 三星Galaxy A55 5G的 Exynos 1480或 Honor 90 5G配备 骁龙 7 代 1.不过，在负载情况下，Honor 和三星要节俭得多。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.05 / 0.32 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.92 / 1.44 / 1.54 Watt
Load midlight 8.09 / 11.15 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
5000 mAh		Honor 90 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
5000 mAh		Motorola Edge 50 Pro
4500 mAh		Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
5%
-10%
-5%
18%
-4%
6%
Idle Minimum *
0.92
0.85
8%
1.19
-29%
1.22
-33%
0.9
2%
1.025 ?(0.92 - 1.13, n=2)
-11%
0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years)
3%
Idle Average *
1.44
1.51
-5%
1.71
-19%
1.47
-2%
1.3
10%
1.405 ?(1.37 - 1.44, n=2)
2%
1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years)
-1%
Idle Maximum *
1.54
1.71
-11%
1.82
-18%
1.58
-3%
1.6
-4%
1.48 ?(1.42 - 1.54, n=2)
4%
1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years)
-5%
Load Average *
8.09
4.87
40%
6.8
16%
8.09
-0%
4.8
41%
8.54 ?(8.09 - 8.98, n=2)
-6%
6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years)
20%
Load Maximum *
11.15
11.73
-5%
10.93
2%
9.49
15%
6.7
40%
12.2 ?(11.2 - 13.2, n=2)
-9%
9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years)
12%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.74 (1.22-11)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.37 (1.064-10.1)
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.03 (0.844-1.561)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.242 (1.109-1.603)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.97 (7.23-9.06)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.21 (4.99-5.9)
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.03 (0.844-1.561)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.242 (1.109-1.603)

电池续航时间 - Camon 30 Premier 显示时间超过 15 小时

Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G 在现实的 WiFi 网上冲浪测试中表现出色。这款智能手机的显示屏仅在 15.5 小时后熄灭。在这一数值下，Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G 只需与 三星Galaxy A55 5G.电池容量为标准的 5000 毫安时。

在不玩游戏和不长时间拍摄视频的情况下，Camon 30 Premier 5G 的日常使用续航时间为两天，然后才需要重新插入电源。这款智能手机的充电速度也令人满意。使用随机提供的 70 瓦电源适配器，从 0 到 100% 的充电时间约为 50 分钟。

一个很好的解决方案是，可以直接在锁屏上选择充电模式。您可以选择最高速度、低温或智能模式。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
15h 37min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G
5000 mAh
937 min
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
5000 mAh
1077 min
Honor 90 5G
5000 mAh
901 min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
5000 mAh
913 min
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
4500 mAh
979 min

Pros

+ 工作速度快
+ 通用摄像系统
+ 供货范围广

Cons

- USB 2.0
- 显示屏可以更亮
- 更新时间短

结论 - Camon 30 Premier 5G 提供无拘无束的异域风情

回顾：Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G。测试设备由制造商提供。
回顾：Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G。测试设备由制造商提供。

Tecno 推出的 Camon 30 Premier 5G 体现了其强大的实力。该设备做工精良，依靠高品质的硬件。其频谱范围从当前高性能的 联发科 Dimensity 8200 Ultimate处理器、四个 5000 万像素摄像头（其中一些配备索尼传感器和光学变焦）以及 120 Hz LTPO AMOLED 显示屏。

凭借其特殊的背面，Tecno 也在视觉上脱颖而出。不过，背面的红色 LED 灯和前置摄像头周围的动态端口仍然没有什么附加值。

照片和视频效果令人满意。各种镜头都很好用，覆盖范围也很广。系统的性能也无可挑剔。Camon 30 Premier 5G 能够为所有可以想象到的应用提供足够的动力。

Tecno Camon Premier 5G 具有异国情调，没有真正的缺点。它从众多产品中脱颖而出，但几乎没有任何弱点。

包括外壳、保护膜和快速电源装置在内的大范围供货令人印象深刻。我们的测试设备甚至还配备了无线蓝牙耳机。支持更新的时间较短是一个缺点。如果能有一个速度更快的 USB 端口就更好了。

更长的更新支持、可扩展内存和 eSIM 支持由 三星Galaxy A55 5G.小米 13 Pro+ 5G 的整体配置同样全面，显示屏更加明亮。 小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G.

价格和供应情况

Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G 在美国没有正式销售。亚马逊上提供该设备的保护套和配件。我们只在德国的 eBay 上找到过这款产品。不过，据说它在其他欧盟国家也有正式销售。评论时，eBay 上的价格范围在 370 至 530 欧元（400 至 570 美元）之间。

Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G - 07/02/2024 v8
Benedikt Winkel

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
53 / 69 → 76%
Weight
88%
Battery
90%
Display
90%
Games Performance
26 / 55 → 47%
Application Performance
61 / 85 → 72%
AI Performance
33%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
79 / 90 → 88%
Camera
82%
Average
55%
81%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
15%
Power Use
96%
Repairability
0%
Software Updates
44.5%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 25.9%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G 智能手机评测--高像素，高性能
Benedikt Winkel, 2024-06-16 (Update: 2024-06-16)