Telekom T Phone Pro智能手机评测--幸福的大家庭
Telekom的T Phone Pro是移动运营商和谷歌合作的结果--至少在软件方面是如此。除了专业机型,还有一款 "普通 "T Phone.专业版机型只提供128GB的存储空间和6GB的内存。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
78.2 % | 04/2023 | Telekom T Phone Pro Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2 | 215 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.82" | 1640x720 | |
83.2 % | 07/2022 | Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4 | 186 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.40" | 2400x1080 | |
78.5 % | 07/2022 | Honor X8 SD 680, Adreno 610 | 177 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.70" | 2388x1080 | |
80.8 % | 08/2022 | OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G SD 695 5G, Adreno 619 | 195 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.59" | 2412x1080 | |
81.9 % | 08/2022 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G SD 695 5G, Adreno 619 | 202 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - T Phone Pro是由铝和塑料制成的。
特点 - 带有无线充电的专业型号
这款手机的处理器是Mediatek Dimensity 700,它由Mali-G57 MP2GPU支持。一些伟大的功能是,Telekom决定安装一个microSD读卡器以及NFC,一个音频插孔和无线Qi充电。然而,用户不得不遗憾地没有Wi-Fi6或双SIM卡。不过,这款智能手机是支持5G的。
微型SD卡读卡器
T Phone Pro的内存可以通过插入microSD卡进行扩展。支持容量高达2TB的卡。然而,在我们使用AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60参考卡的测试中,它的传输速率很一般。尽管T Phone Pro明显击败了小米Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G ,但三星A33能够以三倍的速度传输数据。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Telekom T Phone Pro (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
软件 - Telekom已经使用了VanillaAndroid
通信和GNSS - T Phone Pro上的稳定传输
在使用我们的参考路由器--华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000进行的网络测量中,T Phone Pro没有显示任何异常。连接很稳定,传输率在同类产品中属于平均水平。
电话功能和语音质量--可以有更多可能
尽管这是一款Telekom智能手机,但该设备在使用其他供应商的SIM卡时也能顺利工作。语音质量还可以,但是,该智能手机可以更好地过滤噪音。此外,当你使用该手机打电话时,有时会听到轻微的回声。
这款智能手机支持欧洲最常见的频段,在我们的测试中没有接收问题。还支持VoLTE和WLAN通话。
照相机--T Phone Pro上只有主摄像头是好的。
Telekom宣传T Phone Pro有一个四摄像头系统。然而,只有来自5000万像素主摄像头的照片是真正可用的--即使如此,也只有在光线充足的情况下。相比之下 小T手机相比,Pro有一个额外的超广角镜头。然而,它只有500万像素的分辨率,照片的细节也相应地很差。
与小T手机相比,还可以注意到稍微不同的色彩平衡,而且测试图表上的偏差也较大。
该相机的照片在低光下几乎无法使用。它的软件试图提高照片的亮度,但这主要导致了图像噪音。1600万像素的前置摄像头也同样平庸。它的特点是比T Phone的分辨率高,但仍然没有说服力。它缺乏细节,周边区域也有点太亮了。
使用主摄像头可以录制视频,最大分辨率为2K,但那时只能以30帧/秒。在1080p下,60帧也是可能的。前置摄像头的最大记录分辨率为1080p,每秒30帧。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
HaseSeeUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light![ColorChecker](fileadmin/_processed_/d/9/csm_Foto_TPhonePro_ColorChecker_f0c03efc82.jpg)
![ColorChecker](fileadmin/_processed_/e/1/csm_Foto_TPhonePro_ColorChecker_1Lux_252e3df5b1.jpg)
配件和保修 - Telekom很节俭
T Phone Pro的供货范围并不突出。Telekom的智能手机包括一个SIM卡工具、一份快速指南和一条USB线(A到C)。电源适配器或外壳需要单独购买。没有安装屏幕保护膜。
输入设备和操作 - 解锁T Phone Pro没有问题
显示屏 - 漂亮而大,但不幸的是相当暗淡
6.82英寸的IPS显示屏是T Phone Pro的一个真正的亮点--至少在室内。它的分辨率还可以,面板的对比度也不错。该显示屏的最大弱点无疑是其低的最大亮度。除了 Honor X80之外,它的所有竞争对手都显示出更好的亮度水平,有时甚至很明显。
此外,该显示器只支持60赫兹的刷新率,而这个价格范围内的一些竞争对手提供90或120赫兹。从积极的方面看,我们无法测量PWM。
|
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 436 cd/m²
Contrast: 1557:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95
ΔE Greyscale 7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.29
Telekom T Phone Pro IPS, 1640x720, 6.8" | Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | Honor X8 TFT-LCD, 2388x1080, 6.7" | OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G IPS, 2412x1080, 6.6" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 62% | -12% | 5% | 59% | |
Brightness middle | 436 | 693 59% | 510 17% | 590 35% | 675 55% |
Brightness | 392 | 695 77% | 469 20% | 561 43% | 686 75% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 98 15% | 78 -8% | 92 8% | 95 12% |
Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.82 -193% | 0.38 -36% | ||
Contrast | 1557 | 622 -60% | 1553 0% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 1.3 75% | 2.5 52% | 5.15 1% | 1.3 75% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.5 | 3.5 63% | 5.8 39% | 10.35 -9% | 3.9 59% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7 | 1.3 81% | 4.1 41% | 7.1 -1% | 1.7 76% |
Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.14 103% | 2.45 90% | 2.143 103% | 2.16 102% |
CCT | 8585 76% | 6530 100% | 6307 103% | 8540 76% | 6591 99% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17373 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
41.75 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.63 ms rise | |
↘ 22.12 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.2 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
66.63 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 29.32 ms rise | |
↘ 37.31 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.2 ms). |
性能 - T Phone Pro足以满足日常使用。
T Phone Pro可能不会因其性能而赢得任何奖杯。然而,Dimensity 700,德国电信的处理方式并不差;该SoC根本没有那么快。在测试领域,T Phone Pro在所有基准测试中都输给了配备Snapdragon 695的设备。
这一性能足以玩目前的游戏,如PUBG Mobile。但是,你只能选择高清分辨率,有时确实会出现卡顿。这款手机的性能目前足以应付日常任务,但标题中的 "专业 "肯定让我们有点希望。
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 78964, n=147, last 2 years) | |
Telekom T Phone Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (4863 - 9243, n=5) | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G |
AImark - Score v3.x | |
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 245629, n=129, last 2 years) | |
Telekom T Phone Pro | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (949 - 979, n=2) |
这款手机的GPU性能与CPU的印象相符。在苛刻的基准测试中,T Phone Pro总是排在对比领域的最后。三星的Galaxy A33与马里-G68 MP4处于自己的行列。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
Telekom T Phone Pro | |
Honor X8 |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
Telekom T Phone Pro | |
Honor X8 |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
Telekom T Phone Pro | |
Honor X8 |
3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
Telekom T Phone Pro | |
Honor X8 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | |
Telekom T Phone Pro | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
Telekom T Phone Pro |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G | |
Telekom T Phone Pro |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
Telekom T Phone Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | |
Honor X8 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
Telekom T Phone Pro | |
Honor X8 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
Telekom T Phone Pro | |
Honor X8 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
Telekom T Phone Pro |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | |
Telekom T Phone Pro |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | |
Telekom T Phone Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
Telekom T Phone Pro |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Telekom T Phone Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
Telekom T Phone Pro |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Telekom T Phone Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
Telekom T Phone Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Telekom T Phone Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
Honor X8 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
Telekom T Phone Pro | |
Honor X8 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Telekom T Phone Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
Honor X8 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
Telekom T Phone Pro | |
Honor X8 |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
Telekom T Phone Pro | |
Honor X8 |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=164, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn) | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129) | |
Telekom T Phone Pro (Chrome 112) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (36 - 58.2, n=8) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 445, n=150, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome) | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (34.4 - 41.7, n=6) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 212, n=155, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129) | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129) | |
Telekom T Phone Pro (Chrome 112) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (50 - 59, n=4) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 304, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn) | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129) | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome 102.0.5005.99) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (50 - 65, n=4) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=207, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome 102.0.5005.99) | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn) | |
Telekom T Phone Pro (Chrome 112) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (15352 - 21843, n=9) | |
Honor X8 (Chrome 103) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (2195 - 3387, n=8) | |
Telekom T Phone Pro (Chrome 112) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn) | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129) | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome) | |
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Telekom T Phone Pro | Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | Honor X8 | OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G | Average 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 7% | 14% | -7% | 5% | -37% | 107% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 948 | 512.84 -46% | 926.58 -2% | 509.21 -46% | 523 -45% | 530 ? -44% | 1717 ? 81% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 455 | 487.66 7% | 510.25 12% | 482.15 6% | 488.91 7% | 212 ? -53% | 1322 ? 191% |
Random Read 4KB | 141 | 216.48 54% | 189.38 34% | 179.02 27% | 204.3 45% | 130.6 ? -7% | 265 ? 88% |
Random Write 4KB | 173 | 194.12 12% | 195.75 13% | 147.46 -15% | 196.38 14% | 101.2 ? -42% | 292 ? 69% |
排放 - T Phone Pro保持凉爽
温度
T Phone Pro不是性能猛兽,但它总是能够保持令人愉快的冷却。即使在满负荷的情况下,比如在做基准测试时,它的温度也不会高于温热。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G | |
Telekom T Phone Pro | |
Honor X8 | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G | |
Telekom T Phone Pro | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
Honor X8 |
发言人
Telekom在T Phone Pro的底部安装了一个单声道扬声器。它听起来足够好,具有线性输出--特别是在中音和高音方面。然而,没有听到低音。
它的音量控制也令人惊讶。只有在正常环境下,当音量条在50%左右时才能听到声音。尽管如此,当需要时,扬声器可以变得很响亮,但音量调节级别只有大的步骤--这里没有太多的细微差别。
很好的是,Telekom选择安装一个音频插孔,而且输出是低噪音的(SNR 79.36)。T Phone Pro还支持常见的蓝牙编解码器:SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD和LDAC。
Telekom T Phone Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命--T Phone Pro的电池容量大,运行时间长
消耗功率
T Phone Pro的功耗很均衡,特别是与其他Dimensity 700设备相比。它的最低消耗特别好,这表明它可能有很好的待机时间。然而,与其他处理器相比,考虑到其较低的最大亮度,该比率可能更低。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Telekom T Phone Pro 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A33 5G 5000 mAh | OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G 5000 mAh | Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -14% | 20% | -11% | -18% | -29% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.61 | 0.88 -44% | 0.8 -31% | 0.96 -57% | 0.841 ? -38% | 0.902 ? -48% |
Idle Average * | 2.05 | 1.47 28% | 1 51% | 2.31 -13% | 2.1 ? -2% | 1.448 ? 29% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.15 | 1.52 29% | 1.4 35% | 2.34 -9% | 2.26 ? -5% | 1.608 ? 25% |
Load Average * | 3.34 | 5.38 -61% | 2.4 28% | 2.88 14% | 4.39 ? -31% | 6.1 ? -83% |
Load Maximum * | 5.4 | 6.62 -23% | 4.6 15% | 4.88 10% | 6.21 ? -15% | 9.04 ? -67% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命--T Phone Pro的充电时间长
T Phone Pro的电池寿命很好。在我们现实的Wi-Fi测试中,该设备持续了14个小时以上。然而、OnePlus的Nord CE 2 Lite 5G使用5000毫安时的电池,运行时间甚至更长。
在日常使用中,如果不对其进行过多的测试,T Phone Pro甚至可以运行两天而不停止充电。与普通的 T手机T Phone专业版还提供无线充电功能。然而,需要很长时间才能再次将电池充满。T Phone Pro在一小时后的电量为64%,在24瓦的电源上需要两个多小时才能充满。
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
Telekom T Phone Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | |
Honor X8 | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G |
Pros
Cons
结论 - T手机缺乏专业性
Telekom推出了他们自己的智能手机系列:T Phone和T Phone Pro。虽然普通的T Phone以其低廉的价格得分,但Pro机型的日子更难过。
在T Phone Pro的价格范围内,5G接收不是一个独特的卖点--相反,它是相当标准的同时。在光线充足的情况下,主摄像头的照片是可用的,但它们绝不是突出的。手机上的其他镜头可以被看作是装饰性的配件。显示器很大,但相当暗淡,而且只支持60赫兹。
然而,对于一款专业机型来说,最大的失望在于其性能。虽然在日常使用中应该没有问题,但再多的话,T Phone Pro很可能会挣扎。这是一个相当大的遗憾,因为Telekom已经承诺对该设备进行长期更新。
在能源方面,T Phone Pro也同样矛盾。虽然电池可以持续很长时间,但不幸的是,其充电时间相当缓慢。
T Phone Pro并不是一个糟糕的设备,但它肯定缺少一些积极的功能。
至少它的其他功能是全面的,有可扩展的存储,NFC和音频插孔。然而、三星的Galaxy A33提供了更多的动力,更快的存储和类似的长时间更新。OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite具有更长的电池运行时间和120 Hz显示屏。
价格和可用性
T Phone Pro目前可在10个欧洲市场(德国、奥地利、克罗地亚、捷克共和国、匈牙利、黑山、北马其顿、波兰、罗马尼亚和斯洛伐克)购买,价格约为300美元。在撰写本报告时,这款手机还不能在美国购买。
Telekom T Phone Pro
-
04/17/2023 v7 (old)
Benedikt Winkel
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.