Notebookcheck Logo

Telekom T Phone Pro智能手机评测--幸福的大家庭

像一个专业人员一样？

Telekom已经推出了他们自己的T Phone智能手机系列--甚至还有一个专业型号。这些手机配备了四摄像头、大显示屏、NFC和音频插孔。在此基础上，软件的更新可以持续很长时间。在这篇评论中，你可以了解到T Phone Pro是否是一款适合所有人的专业机型。
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Telekom的T Phone Pro是移动运营商和谷歌合作的结果--至少在软件方面是如此。除了专业机型，还有一款 "普通 "T Phone.专业版机型只提供128GB的存储空间和6GB的内存。

Telekom T Phone Pro (T Phone Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 700 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G57 MP2
Memory
6 GB 
Display
6.82 inch 20.5:9, 1640 x 720 pixel 263 PPI, capacitive, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 111 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: microSD up to 2 TB (FAT, FAT32), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), LTE (700, 800, 850, 900, 1700, 1800, 1900, 2100, 2600 MHz), 5G Sub6 FDD: N1 (2100), N3 (1800), N7 (2600), N28 (700), 5G Sub6 TDD: N38 (2600), N78 (3500), LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 173.9 x 77.4
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
wireless charging
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix Hynix-Hi-5021 + 5 MPix Ultrawide + 2 MPix Macro + 2 MPix depth of field
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 1, Keyboard: Onscreen, USB cable (Type-A to Type-C), SIM eject tool, 24 Months Warranty, Camera2 API: Level 3, IP52, SAR-Head 0.84 W/kg, SAR-Body 1.36 W/kg, fanless
Weight
215 g
Price
269 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
78.2 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Telekom T Phone Pro
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2		215 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.82"1640x720
83.2 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4		186 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.40"2400x1080
78.5 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Honor X8
SD 680, Adreno 610		177 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2388x1080
80.8 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2022
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619		195 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.59"2412x1080
81.9 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2022
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619		202 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080

T Phone Pro是一款大型智能手机。它的6.8英寸显示屏被广阔的显示屏边缘所包围。背部由塑料制成，框架由铝制成。这款手机的结构很稳定，几乎不能弯曲。它的显示屏由一种未指定类型的玻璃保护。一个洋红色的电源按钮和一个音量摇杆位于手机的右侧。

该设备只有 "暗影 "色--一种深色的哑光灰色。尽管它是哑光色，但还是留下了不少指纹印。它的摄像头单元几乎没有突出设备，如果你在手机放置在桌子上时打字，它也不会摇晃。附带的超长SIM卡弹出工具对于打开SIM卡槽是必要的。该设备的保护等级为IP52。

尺寸比较

❌
173.9 mm 77.4 mm 8.9 mm 215 g164.3 mm 75.6 mm 8.5 mm 195 g164.19 mm 76.1 mm 8.12 mm 202 g163.4 mm 74.7 mm 7.45 mm 177 g159.7 mm 74 mm 8.1 mm 186 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

特点 - 带有无线充电的专业型号

这款手机的处理器是Mediatek Dimensity 700，它由Mali-G57 MP2GPU支持。一些伟大的功能是，Telekom决定安装一个microSD读卡器以及NFC，一个音频插孔和无线Qi充电。然而，用户不得不遗憾地没有Wi-Fi6或双SIM卡。不过，这款智能手机是支持5G的。

微型SD卡读卡器

T Phone Pro的内存可以通过插入microSD卡进行扩展。支持容量高达2TB的卡。然而，在我们使用AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60参考卡的测试中，它的传输速率很一般。尽管T Phone Pro明显击败了小米Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G ，但三星A33能够以三倍的速度传输数据。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
59.21 MB/s +234%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
17.72 MB/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12.13 MB/s -32%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Telekom T Phone Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø38.5 (26.1-50.3)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32.6 (24.4-44)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø43.7 (29-56.7)
Telekom T Phone Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø67.8 (35.5-78.8)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78.2 (34.6-89.2)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø83.8 (43.5-112.8)

软件 - Telekom已经使用了VanillaAndroid

T Phone Pro以最纯粹的形式运行VanillaAndroid - 没有安装任何臃肿的软件，这很好。只有典型的谷歌应用程序可以找到。这意味着它的系统很好，很苗条，而且有117GB可供自由使用。

在我们的测试中，该智能手机仍在运行Android 12，安全补丁是本月的。Telekom承诺四年的安全更新。据称，前三年每月都会有这些更新，第四年每季度更新一次。

Android 12中仍然没有原生的单手操作模式，考虑到它是一个如此大的智能手机，这是一个耻辱。然而，制造商已承诺 "很快 "提供Android 13，这显然也将引入单手操作模式。

通信和GNSS - T Phone Pro上的稳定传输

在使用我们的参考路由器--华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000进行的网络测量中，T Phone Pro没有显示任何异常。连接很稳定，传输率在同类产品中属于平均水平。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=186, last 2 years)
713 MBit/s +93%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
370 (362min - 371max) MBit/s
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
352 (339min - 360max) MBit/s -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
346 (334min - 353max) MBit/s -6%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
343 (337min - 348max) MBit/s -7%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
247 (47min - 312max) MBit/s -33%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=188, last 2 years)
728 MBit/s +95%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
373 (364min - 385max) MBit/s
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
363 (354min - 376max) MBit/s -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
354 (180min - 373max) MBit/s -5%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
303 (108min - 372max) MBit/s -19%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
268 (133min - 280max) MBit/s -28%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
Telekom T Phone Pro MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø367 (362-371)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø345 (334-353)
Telekom T Phone Pro MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø373 (364-385)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø348 (180-373)
全球导航卫星系统户外测量
全球导航卫星系统户外测量
全球导航卫星系统室内测量
全球导航卫星系统室内测量

在我们的测试中，它的卫星连接并没有引起任何问题。从建筑物内建立连接需要一点时间，但它是稳定和准确的。

T Phone Pro的路线导航在一次自行车旅行中也运行良好。在实践中，例如用谷歌地图导航时，该设备没有显示任何问题。T Phone Pro支持GPS、Glonass和Galileo，但只支持一个频段（L1/L1/E1）。

GNSS测试之旅：湖泊往返
GNSS测试之旅：湖泊往返
GNSS测试之旅：转折点
GNSS测试之旅：转折点
GNSS测试之旅：总结
GNSS测试之旅：总结

电话功能和语音质量--可以有更多可能

尽管这是一款Telekom智能手机，但该设备在使用其他供应商的SIM卡时也能顺利工作。语音质量还可以，但是，该智能手机可以更好地过滤噪音。此外，当你使用该手机打电话时，有时会听到轻微的回声。

这款智能手机支持欧洲最常见的频段，在我们的测试中没有接收问题。还支持VoLTE和WLAN通话。

照相机--T Phone Pro上只有主摄像头是好的。

使用T Phone Pro的自拍
使用T Phone Pro的自拍

Telekom宣传T Phone Pro有一个四摄像头系统。然而，只有来自5000万像素主摄像头的照片是真正可用的--即使如此，也只有在光线充足的情况下。相比之下 小T手机相比，Pro有一个额外的超广角镜头。然而，它只有500万像素的分辨率，照片的细节也相应地很差。

与小T手机相比，还可以注意到稍微不同的色彩平衡，而且测试图表上的偏差也较大。

该相机的照片在低光下几乎无法使用。它的软件试图提高照片的亮度，但这主要导致了图像噪音。1600万像素的前置摄像头也同样平庸。它的特点是比T Phone的分辨率高，但仍然没有说服力。它缺乏细节，周边区域也有点太亮了。

使用主摄像头可以录制视频，最大分辨率为2K，但那时只能以30帧/秒。在1080p下，60帧也是可能的。前置摄像头的最大记录分辨率为1080p，每秒30帧。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HaseSeeUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light
ColorChecker
13.5 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
0.8 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Telekom T Phone Pro: 9.06 ∆E min: 0.82 - max: 19.16 ∆E
ColorChecker
30.7 ∆E
54.9 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.5 ∆E
45.9 ∆E
62 ∆E
53.5 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
63.9 ∆E
31.6 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
76 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
42 ∆E
92.9 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Telekom T Phone Pro: 47.15 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 92.93 ∆E

配件和保修 - Telekom很节俭

T Phone Pro的供货范围并不突出。Telekom的智能手机包括一个SIM卡工具、一份快速指南和一条USB线（A到C）。电源适配器或外壳需要单独购买。没有安装屏幕保护膜。

输入设备和操作 - 解锁T Phone Pro没有问题

在我们的测试中，T Phone Pro的触摸屏并不显眼，没有产生任何错误。由于该设备的尺寸，单手操作会很方便，据说这将与Android 13。T Phone Pro使用GBoard键盘前作。

该智能手机通过位于电源按钮的指纹扫描仪或二维面部识别来解锁。这两种解锁方法都能可靠地工作--但摄像头需要足够的光线来识别你的脸。然而，智能手机每天也会要求输入PIN或密码数次。

显示屏 - 漂亮而大，但不幸的是相当暗淡

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

6.82英寸的IPS显示屏是T Phone Pro的一个真正的亮点--至少在室内。它的分辨率还可以，面板的对比度也不错。该显示屏的最大弱点无疑是其低的最大亮度。除了 Honor X80之外，它的所有竞争对手都显示出更好的亮度水平，有时甚至很明显。

此外，该显示器只支持60赫兹的刷新率，而这个价格范围内的一些竞争对手提供90或120赫兹。从积极的方面看，我们无法测量PWM。

386
cd/m²		413
cd/m²		378
cd/m²
381
cd/m²		436
cd/m²		371
cd/m²
375
cd/m²		419
cd/m²		371
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 436 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 392.2 cd/m² Minimum: 3.51 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 436 cd/m²
Contrast: 1557:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.29
Telekom T Phone Pro
IPS, 1640x720, 6.8"		Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"		Honor X8
TFT-LCD, 2388x1080, 6.7"		OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
IPS, 2412x1080, 6.6"		Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen
62%
-12%
5%
59%
Brightness middle
436
693
59%
510
17%
590
35%
675
55%
Brightness
392
695
77%
469
20%
561
43%
686
75%
Brightness Distribution
85
98
15%
78
-8%
92
8%
95
12%
Black Level *
0.28
0.82
-193%
0.38
-36%
Contrast
1557
622
-60%
1553
0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.2
1.3
75%
2.5
52%
5.15
1%
1.3
75%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.5
3.5
63%
5.8
39%
10.35
-9%
3.9
59%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
7
1.3
81%
4.1
41%
7.1
-1%
1.7
76%
Gamma
2.29 96%
2.14 103%
2.45 90%
2.143 103%
2.16 102%
CCT
8585 76%
6530 100%
6307 103%
8540 76%
6591 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8747 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

T Phone Pro的良好对比度率主要归功于非常低的黑值。它的DeltaE偏差总体上相当大，特别是在灰度方面。

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
41.75 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.63 ms rise
↘ 22.12 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
66.63 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 29.32 ms rise
↘ 37.31 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

IPS面板的视角稳定性还不错--至少在室内是这样。在室外，可读性主要受制于手机的低最大亮度。从侧面看时，屏幕几乎看不清。

 

性能 - T Phone Pro足以满足日常使用。

T Phone Pro可能不会因其性能而赢得任何奖杯。然而，Dimensity 700，德国电信的处理方式并不差；该SoC根本没有那么快。在测试领域，T Phone Pro在所有基准测试中都输给了配备Snapdragon 695的设备。

这一性能足以玩目前的游戏，如PUBG Mobile。但是，你只能选择高清分辨率，有时确实会出现卡顿。这款手机的性能目前足以应付日常任务，但标题中的 "专业 "肯定让我们有点希望。

Geekbench 6.0 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (188 - 2008, n=41, last 2 years)
1257 Points +89%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (664 - 692, n=3)
680 Points +2%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
664 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 5702, n=41, last 2 years)
3366 Points +92%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (1756 - 1826, n=3)
1802 Points +3%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1756 Points
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 1650926, n=106, last 2 years)
794703 Points +138%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
399726 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
398969 Points +19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
398622 Points +19%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
334015 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (243323 - 356312, n=5)
305947 Points -8%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=191, last 2 years)
12953 Points +65%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
11077 Points +41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10396 Points +32%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
9363 Points +19%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (6492 - 10433, n=11)
8048 Points +2%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
7854 Points
Honor X8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144
7645 Points -3%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1517, n=158, last 2 years)
882 Points +70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
599 Points +15%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
593 Points +14%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
520 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (371 - 534, n=5)
496 Points -5%
Honor X8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 6144
413 Points -21%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)
6273 Points +126%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3638 Points +31%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3596 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3477 Points +25%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2779 - 3107, n=8)
2926 Points +5%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2779 Points
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)
10160 Points +108%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7976 Points +63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7836 Points +60%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
7184 Points +47%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (4888 - 6712, n=8)
5669 Points +16%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
4888 Points
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)
6733 Points +83%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4311 Points +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4183 Points +14%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (3685 - 4473, n=8)
4100 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3829 Points +4%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3685 Points
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)
16804 Points +547%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
5104 Points +96%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4426 Points +70%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4323 Points +66%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2599 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2398 - 2676, n=8)
2572 Points -1%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)
1559 Points +22%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1274 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (1083 - 1353, n=8)
1237 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1207 Points -5%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1125 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1041 Points -18%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 74958, n=144, last 2 years)
16564 Points +79%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9243 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
9167 Points -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (4863 - 9243, n=5)
6899 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4126 Points -55%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=135, last 2 years)
25869 Points +2542%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
979 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (949 - 979, n=2)
964 Points -2%

这款手机的GPU性能与CPU的印象相符。在苛刻的基准测试中，T Phone Pro总是排在对比领域的最后。三星的Galaxy A33与马里-G68 MP4处于自己的行列。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
617 Points +94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
351 Points +10%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
351 Points +10%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
318 Points
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
124 Points -61%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
632 Points +95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
361 Points +11%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
360 Points +11%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
324 Points
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
127 Points -61%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2238 Points +92%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1205 Points +3%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1201 Points +3%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1166 Points
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
442 Points -62%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2262 Points +93%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1211 Points +3%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1206 Points +3%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1175 Points
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
456 Points -61%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2824 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2822 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2676 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2594 Points -8%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3911 Points +70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2721 Points +19%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2710 Points +18%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2296 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3514 Points +47%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2734 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2711 Points +13%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2396 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3613 Points +2%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3561 Points +1%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
3532 Points
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3035 Points -14%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2571 Points -27%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3922 Points +68%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2988 Points +28%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2973 Points +28%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2329 Points
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1186 Points -49%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3683 Points +46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3107 Points +23%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3086 Points +22%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2520 Points
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1347 Points -47%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
81 fps +37%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
78 fps +32%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps +2%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
59 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps +52%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
93 fps +50%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
91 fps +47%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
62 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
59 fps +5%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
56 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps -25%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps -25%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps +58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +24%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +24%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
38 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
45 fps
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
37 fps -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -33%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -33%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
38 fps +192%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +162%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +162%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
13 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
23 fps
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -26%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -26%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps +53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +27%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +27%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
15 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
17 fps
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps -29%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps -29%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4.6 fps -73%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps +67%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.2 fps +37%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.1 fps +35%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
6 fps
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3.2 fps -47%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
26 fps
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps -27%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps -27%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7.8 fps -70%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps +73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps +47%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps +47%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
15 fps
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9.5 fps -37%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4.4 fps +120%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps +80%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps +80%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2 fps
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1.4 fps -30%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=162, last 2 years)
119.8 Points +128%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome)
66.011 Points +26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn)
64.223 Points +22%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
64.165 Points +22%
Telekom T Phone Pro (Chrome 112)
52.47 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (36 - 58.2, n=8)
45.6 Points -13%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=148, last 2 years)
135.1 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome)
47.99 runs/min
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
47.11 runs/min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn)
38.7 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (34.4 - 41.7, n=6)
37.4 runs/min
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=153, last 2 years)
113.2 Points +92%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
65 Points +10%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
64 Points +8%
Telekom T Phone Pro (Chrome 112)
59 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (50 - 59, n=4)
54.3 Points -8%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=81, last 2 years)
147.5 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn)
100 Points
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
96 Points
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome 102.0.5005.99)
82 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (50 - 65, n=4)
56.8 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
36886 Points +114%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome 102.0.5005.99)
24521 Points +42%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
22285 Points +29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn)
21269 Points +23%
Telekom T Phone Pro (Chrome 112)
17266 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (15352 - 21843, n=9)
17130 Points -1%
Honor X8 (Chrome 103)
13141 Points -24%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700 (2195 - 3387, n=8)
2693 ms * -15%
Telekom T Phone Pro (Chrome 112)
2349 ms *
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn)
2013.3 ms * +14%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
1922.7 ms * +18%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome)
1856.6 ms * +21%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)
1579 ms * +33%

* ... smaller is better

Telekom T Phone ProSamsung Galaxy A33 5GHonor X8OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
7%
14%
-7%
5%
-37%
120%
Sequential Read 256KB
948
512.84
-46%
926.58
-2%
509.21
-46%
523
-45%
530 ?(286 - 948, n=37)
-44%
1834 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years)
93%
Sequential Write 256KB
455
487.66
7%
510.25
12%
482.15
6%
488.91
7%
212 ?(103.4 - 466, n=37)
-53%
1420 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years)
212%
Random Read 4KB
141
216.48
54%
189.38
34%
179.02
27%
204.3
45%
130.6 ?(65 - 233, n=37)
-7%
276 ?(22.2 - 483, n=193, last 2 years)
96%
Random Write 4KB
173
194.12
12%
195.75
13%
147.46
-15%
196.38
14%
101.2 ?(13.5 - 187.4, n=37)
-42%
309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years)
79%

排放 - T Phone Pro保持凉爽

温度

T Phone Pro不是性能猛兽，但它总是能够保持令人愉快的冷却。即使在满负荷的情况下，比如在做基准测试时，它的温度也不会高于温热。

Max. Load
 31.8 °C30.7 °C32.4 °C 
 31.9 °C30.8 °C32.5 °C 
 31.1 °C31.2 °C29.8 °C 
Maximum: 32.5 °C
Average: 31.4 °C
29.4 °C30.7 °C31.3 °C
29 °C30.2 °C31.5 °C
28.9 °C29 °C29.9 °C
Maximum: 31.5 °C
Average: 30 °C
Room Temperature 20.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
99.2 %
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.1 % 0%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.3 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.3 % 0%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
99.2 %
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 % 0%
Honor X8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
97.9 % -1%
012345678910111213Tooltip
Telekom T Phone Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.954 (1.947-1.963)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø3.77 (3.76-3.79)
Honor X8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø0.753 (0.745-0.76)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø2.16 (2.16-2.17)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.5 (13.4-13.5)
Honor X8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø2.68 (2.66-2.68)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.21 (7.21-7.23)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.23 (7.21-7.25)
Telekom T Phone Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.01 (7.01-7.06)

发言人

Telekom在T Phone Pro的底部安装了一个单声道扬声器。它听起来足够好，具有线性输出--特别是在中音和高音方面。然而，没有听到低音。

它的音量控制也令人惊讶。只有在正常环境下，当音量条在50%左右时才能听到声音。尽管如此，当需要时，扬声器可以变得很响亮，但音量调节级别只有大的步骤--这里没有太多的细微差别。

很好的是，Telekom选择安装一个音频插孔，而且输出是低噪音的（SNR 79.36）。T Phone Pro还支持常见的蓝牙编解码器：SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD和LDAC。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs202933.32525.332.23125.738.84026.738.35029.338.86321.136.18017.839.41001739.212513.142.816012.644.620011.750.125011.156.73151260.440010.962.150011.969.163010.469.38009.773.1100010.776.7125011.974.7160011.177.4200011.776.6250012.377.7315013.582.1400012.582.9500012.684.3630013.379.5800013.677.21000014.176.91250013.572.61600013.261.5SPL24.491.2N0.585.4median 12.3median 74.7Delta1.18.642.641.22930.527.825.725.822.632.528.522.423.324.520.619.43316.541.918.448.112.848.89.952.211.354.913.15611.466.51169.411.670.612.374.61275.912.475.512.276.61376.412.876.513.278.413.479.113.876.913.370.313.363.313.567.913.161.324.987.60.670.6median 13median 70.30.810.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseTelekom T Phone ProXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Telekom T Phone Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命--T Phone Pro的电池容量大，运行时间长

消耗功率

T Phone Pro的功耗很均衡，特别是与其他Dimensity 700设备相比。它的最低消耗特别好，这表明它可能有很好的待机时间。然而，与其他处理器相比，考虑到其较低的最大亮度，该比率可能更低。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.11 / 0.34 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.61 / 2.05 / 2.15 Watt
Load midlight 3.34 / 5.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Telekom T Phone Pro
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
5000 mAh		OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
5000 mAh		Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-14%
20%
-11%
-18%
-33%
Idle Minimum *
0.61
0.88
-44%
0.8
-31%
0.96
-57%
0.841 ?(0.61 - 1.28, n=8)
-38%
0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=154, last 2 years)
-47%
Idle Average *
2.05
1.47
28%
1
51%
2.31
-13%
2.1 ?(1.1 - 4.52, n=8)
-2%
1.454 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=154, last 2 years)
29%
Idle Maximum *
2.15
1.52
29%
1.4
35%
2.34
-9%
2.26 ?(1.2 - 4.58, n=8)
-5%
1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=154, last 2 years)
25%
Load Average *
3.34
5.38
-61%
2.4
28%
2.88
14%
4.39 ?(3.27 - 10.5, n=8)
-31%
6.44 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=149, last 2 years)
-93%
Load Maximum *
5.4
6.62
-23%
4.6
15%
4.88
10%
6.21 ?(5.3 - 11.2, n=8)
-15%
9.77 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=149, last 2 years)
-81%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Telekom T Phone Pro MediaTek Dimensity 700; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.89 (1.099-5.16)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.96 (1.151-5.46)
Telekom T Phone Pro MediaTek Dimensity 700; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.143 (1.073-1.61)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.362 (1.329-1.504)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.40.60.91.11.31.51.71.92.22.42.62.833.23.53.73.94.1Tooltip
Telekom T Phone Pro MediaTek Dimensity 700; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.53 (2.07-3.02)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.14 (2.9-4.32)
Telekom T Phone Pro MediaTek Dimensity 700; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.143 (1.073-1.61)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.362 (1.329-1.504)

电池寿命--T Phone Pro的充电时间长

T Phone Pro的电池寿命很好。在我们现实的Wi-Fi测试中，该设备持续了14个小时以上。然而、OnePlus的Nord CE 2 Lite 5G使用5000毫安时的电池，运行时间甚至更长。

在日常使用中，如果不对其进行过多的测试，T Phone Pro甚至可以运行两天而不停止充电。与普通的 T手机T Phone专业版还提供无线充电功能。然而，需要很长时间才能再次将电池充满。T Phone Pro在一小时后的电量为64%，在24瓦的电源上需要两个多小时才能充满。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
14h 11min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Telekom T Phone Pro
5000 mAh
851 min
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
5000 mAh
771 min
Honor X8
4000 mAh
858 min
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
5000 mAh
1064 min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
788 min

Pros

+ 大显示屏
+ 伟大的电池寿命
+ 无线充电
+ 可扩展的存储空间

Cons

- 显示昏暗
- 只有主摄像头可以使用
- 充电时间长

结论 - T手机缺乏专业性

Telekom T Phone Pro评论。测试设备由德国电信提供。
Telekom T Phone Pro评论。测试设备由德国电信提供。

Telekom推出了他们自己的智能手机系列：T Phone和T Phone Pro。虽然普通的T Phone以其低廉的价格得分，但Pro机型的日子更难过。

在T Phone Pro的价格范围内，5G接收不是一个独特的卖点--相反，它是相当标准的同时。在光线充足的情况下，主摄像头的照片是可用的，但它们绝不是突出的。手机上的其他镜头可以被看作是装饰性的配件。显示器很大，但相当暗淡，而且只支持60赫兹。

然而，对于一款专业机型来说，最大的失望在于其性能。虽然在日常使用中应该没有问题，但再多的话，T Phone Pro很可能会挣扎。这是一个相当大的遗憾，因为Telekom已经承诺对该设备进行长期更新。

在能源方面，T Phone Pro也同样矛盾。虽然电池可以持续很长时间，但不幸的是，其充电时间相当缓慢。

T Phone Pro并不是一个糟糕的设备，但它肯定缺少一些积极的功能。

至少它的其他功能是全面的，有可扩展的存储，NFC和音频插孔。然而、三星的Galaxy A33提供了更多的动力，更快的存储和类似的长时间更新。OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite具有更长的电池运行时间和120 Hz显示屏。

价格和可用性

T Phone Pro目前可在10个欧洲市场（德国、奥地利、克罗地亚、捷克共和国、匈牙利、黑山、北马其顿、波兰、罗马尼亚和斯洛伐克）购买，价格约为300美元。在撰写本报告时，这款手机还不能在美国购买。

Telekom T Phone Pro - 04/17/2023 v7 (old)
Benedikt Winkel

Chassis
80%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
85%
Connectivity
48 / 70 → 68%
Weight
88%
Battery
90%
Display
82%
Games Performance
26 / 64 → 41%
Application Performance
71 / 86 → 83%
Temperature
94%
Noise
100%
Audio
80 / 90 → 88%
Camera
52%
Average
74%
78%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

More articles related to this device

Telekom T Phone Pro (T Phone Series)

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Telekom T Phone Pro智能手机评测--幸福的大家庭
Benedikt Winkel, 2023-04-20 (Update: 2024-08-15)