联想ThinkBook 16 G4+评测。优秀的多媒体笔记本电脑，功率大

Name: Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP
Brand: Lenovo

铝制外壳和WQHD面板。

联想在ThinkBook 16 G4+中提供了一款大型16英寸多媒体笔记本，由于采用了英特尔酷睿i7-12700H和专用的NvidiaGeForce RTX 2050，以及16:10格式的良好sRGB屏幕，它被武装得非常强大。

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 09/21/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Alder Lake Geforce Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Windows

通过ThinkBook 16 G4+，联想推出了一款16英寸多媒体笔记本，拥有强大的组件和大量的现代功能，建议零售价为1200欧元（约合1200美元）。除了最新的英特尔酷睿i7-12700H处理器，还有Nvidia的专用GeForce RTX 2050，以及现代功能，如Thunderbolt 4、Wi-Fi 6E或PCIe 4.0。显示屏是哑光WQHD IPS面板，有一个大的1TB固态硬盘，以及16GB的内存。我们的审查样本是一个没有操作系统的校园模型。

Test device courtesy of campuspoint.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP (ThinkBook 16 G4+ Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-12700H 14 x 1.7 - 4.7 GHz, 80 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Core: 1762 MHz, RAM: 1750 MHz, 60 W TDP ( including 10 W Dynamic Boost), 516.96

Memory

16 GB

, LPDDR5-4800, Dual-Channel, onboard

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, LEN160WQXGA, IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Storage

Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK, 1024 GB

, 916 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: SD, 1 Fingerprint Reader

Networking

Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 16.5 x 356 x 251

Battery

71 Wh, 4622 mAh Lithium-Ion

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Camera

Webcam: 1080p
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo (2x 2W), Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 100W PSU USB-C, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.823 kg, Power Supply: 396 g

Price

1199 Euro

Links

Lenovo homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
88.4 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2022	Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	1.8 kg	16.5 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
87.4 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2022	Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	18.99 mm	16.00"	3072x1920
86.2 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2022	Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 i5-11320H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	1.8 kg	18.9 mm	16.10"	1920x1080
v ^(old)	12 / 2021	Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	1.9 kg	19 mm	16.10"	3840x2400
83.6 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2022	Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.7 kg	18.4 mm	16.00"	1920x1200
79.8 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2022	Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 i7-1260P, A350M	1.6 kg	15 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

外壳 - 联想使用了铝材

联想主要使用铝制外壳（即盖子和底座单元），表面经过喷砂以及阳极氧化处理。光滑的表面让人感觉很舒服，并传达出高质量的印象。指纹可以比较快地被看到，但也可以很容易地被去除。在视觉上，银色的外壳看起来很优雅，很适合专业环境。唯一的视觉亮点是具有两种不同灰色调的双色显示屏盖子。

在做工方面，ThinkBook从根本上给人以良好的印象，但仍有改进的余地。我们能够从底座上引出安静的吱吱声，键盘区也能被压住。显示屏盖被证明是比较稳定的--我们无法带来任何图像错误，但是当打开的角度改变时，显示屏明显摇晃。最大的180度是可能的，铰链调整得很好，因为单手打开没有问题。

除了Acer Swift X，对比领域中的16英寸设备在尺寸上非常相似。然而，ThinkBook比大多数对手要薄一些，只有1.65厘米。重量为1.82公斤，不包括电源适配器的额外400克。

尺寸比较

Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 DIN A4 ❌

设备 - 带有Thunderbolt 4的ThinkBook

ThinkBook 16 G4+几乎提供了你所需要的所有端口。除了一个现代的Thunderbolt 4端口外，还有常规的USB-A端口、一个成熟的HDMI输出和一个千兆以太网端口。甚至在右侧的挡板下还有一个隐藏的USB端口，它只符合2.0标准，但对于永久连接的电子狗，如外部输入设备来说是完美的。

左边：USB-C 3.2 Gen.2（10 Gbps，DisplayPort ALT模式1.4，Power Delivery），USB-A 3.2 Gen.1（5 Gbps），HDMI 2.1，雷电4（40 Gbps，DisplayPort ALT模式1.4，Power Delivery 3.0），3.5毫米音频

右边。USB-A 2.0（隐藏），SD读卡器，USB-A 3.2 Gen.1（5 GBit/s），千兆以太网，Kensington Nano插槽

SD卡阅读器

右侧有一个SD读卡器，不能完全容纳存储卡（它们突出了约2厘米）。我们通过参考卡（Angelbird AV Pro V60 UHS-II）测得的传输速率几乎达到90MB/s，这使ThinkBook领先于那些读卡器只能通过USB 2.0功能的竞争对手。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years)	102.1 MB/s +21%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	84.2 MB/s
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	37.2 MB/s -56%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	27.02 MB/s -68%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	25.6 MB/s -70%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years)	142.7 MB/s +57%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	91 MB/s
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	38 MB/s -58%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	28.41 MB/s -69%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	26 MB/s -71%

沟通

除了千兆以太网模块（英特尔I219-V），联想还安装了非常现代的英特尔AX211E Wi-Fi 6E模块，理论上支持最新的6GHz网络。然而，我们无法连接到华硕的参考路由器的6GHz网络。然而，在5GHz网络上的传输速率非常高而且稳定，这就是为什么在实践中没有真正的限制。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (1003 - 1501, n=4)	1320 MBit/s
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	998 MBit/s
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	915 (458^min - 960^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1675 MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (1178 - 1623, n=4)	1409 MBit/s
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	649 (613^min - 666^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1648 (1595^min - 1700^max) MBit/s +1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1630 (1584^min, 1584.58^P1 - 1678^max) MBit/s
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1372 (1168^min - 1507^max) MBit/s -16%
Average of class Multimedia (358 - 1921, n=78, last 2 years)	1359 MBit/s -17%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (464 - 1921, n=238)	1233 MBit/s -24%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1676 (1600^min, 1610.44^P1 - 1704^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1665 (1642^min - 1675^max) MBit/s -1%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1576 (1376^min - 1661^max) MBit/s -6%
Average of class Multimedia (709 - 1789, n=77, last 2 years)	1447 MBit/s -14%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=238)	1379 MBit/s -18%

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1676 (1600-1704)

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1630 (1584-1678)

网络摄像头

ThinkBook提供了一个带有机械快门的1080p网络摄像头，比以前的720p模块提供更好的图像。此外，还有一个红外摄像头，用于通过Windows Hello进行人脸识别。

ColorChecker Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP: 10.01 ∆E min: 2.28 - max: 16.49 ∆E

维护

底板用总共10颗Torx螺钉（T5）固定，可以很容易地拆下来。之后，你可以清洁两个风扇，并接触到两个用于SSD的M.2-2280插槽。WLAN模块部分被粘住了，但原则上可以更换。只有内存是焊接的，不能升级。

输入设备 - 带有普通键盘的多媒体笔记本电脑

深灰色的键盘提供两级白色背光，以及右侧的专用数字键盘，尽管这里的按键有点窄。就打字的感觉而言，ThinkBook更像是制造商的IdeaPads，而不是ThinkPads的风格。按键行程相当短，但至少反馈非常精确，而且按键也没有响动。在我们看来，联想在这里浪费了一些潜力；如果你经常输入很长的文字，还有更舒适的输入方式。电源键位于键盘上方的右侧，包括一个指纹扫描仪。

大的ClickPad被稍微移到左边，12 x 7.5厘米，为指针导航和最多四个手指的手势提供了足够的空间。由于采用了微软的Precision 标准，这一点做得非常好，而且垫子也没有响动。下半部分可以用物理方式按压，但其特点是发出响亮而廉价的点击声，所以你应该只点击垫子（点击即可）。

显示屏 - 哑光的WQHD IPS面板

联想为ThinkBook 16 G4+配备了16:10格式的哑光WQHD面板，但有两个不同版本的IPS屏幕。我们的评测样本使用的是60赫兹面板，但根据规格表，还可以选择带有工厂色彩校准的120赫兹型号。

我们对哑光面板的主观图像印象非常好。内容显示清晰，色彩鲜艳，明亮的区域没有颗粒感。我们确定了一个非常好的对比度，接近1700:1（黑值0.23），这当然也有助于生动的图像印象。联想指定的亮度为350cd/m²，我们的面板刚好超过了这个数值。没有PWM闪烁，响应时间也不明显，但在高亮度水平下，黑暗背景上有明显的光晕。IPS显示屏的视角稳定性非常好，但不支持HDR内容。


352 cd/m²	367 cd/m²	364 cd/m²
349 cd/m²	371 cd/m²	375 cd/m²
343 cd/m²	341 cd/m²	352 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LEN160WQXGA tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 375 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 357.1 cd/m² Minimum: 3.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 372 cd/m²
Contrast: 1613:1 (Black: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.3
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
71.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.32

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP LEN160WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 BOE NE16N41, IPS, 3072x1920, 16"	Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Chi Mei N161HCA-EA3, , 1920x1080, 16.1"	Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE Samsung ATNA60YV02-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.1"	Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 BOE NV160WUM-NH0, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"	Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 NE156FHM-NS0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		2%	-5%	27%	-4%	-27%
Display P3 Coverage	69.6	70.8 2%	65.1 -6%	99.8 43%	66.2 -5%	49.6 -29%
sRGB Coverage	97.5	99.5 2%	95.65 -2%	100 3%	96.4 -1%	74.8 -23%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	71.7	73.2 2%	66.75 -7%	96.9 35%	68.3 -5%	51.3 -28%
Response Times		-42%	-6%	91%	-2%	-24%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	32.7 ?(15.7, 17)	38 ?(21.2, 16.8) -16%	30 ?(14, 16) 8%	2 ?(1, 1) 94%	30.5 ?(14.2, 16.3) 7%	32.3 ?(14.8, 17.5) 1%
Response Time Black / White *	16.8 ?(6.4, 10.4)	28 ?(13.2, 14.8) -67%	20 ?(11, 9) -19%	2 ?(1, 1) 88%	18.7 ?(9.7, 9) -11%	25 ?(13.3, 11.7) -49%
PWM Frequency				60 ?(80)
Screen		8%	11%	14%	-19%	-71%
Brightness middle	371	288.9 -22%	276 -26%	392 6%	319 -14%	337 -9%
Brightness	357	276 -23%	264 -26%	396 11%	317 -11%	325 -9%
Brightness Distribution	91	92 1%	85 -7%	98 8%	90 -1%	89 -2%
Black Level *	0.23	0.26 -13%	0.16 30%		0.23 -0%	0.4 -74%
Contrast	1613	1111 -31%	1725 7%		1387 -14%	843 -48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.6	1.88 28%	1.8 31%	1.74 33%	3.4 -31%	4.7 -81%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.4	4.37 1%	3.77 14%	3.18 28%	8.1 -84%	15.7 -257%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.3	0.42 68%	0.63 52%	1.85 -42%	0.8 38%	2.8 -115%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.7	1.4 62%	2.76 25%	1.77 52%	5.7 -54%	5.4 -46%
Gamma	2.32 ^95%	2.3 ^96%	2.37 ^93%	2.22 ^99%	2.1 ^105%	2.07 ^106%
CCT	7271 ^89%	6634 ^98%	6564 ^99%	6483 ^100%	7433 ^87%	7727 ^84%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-11% / -0%	0% / 5%	44% / 30%	-8% / -13%	-41% / -55%

* ... smaller is better

我们用专业的CalMAN软件（X-Rite i1 Pro 2）进行分析，发现有一点偏蓝的色调，同时色温也略微过冷。另一方面，与sRGB参考色彩空间相比，灰度和色彩的偏差已经相当低。如果你不想编辑图片，你不一定要校准面板，但这里仍有很大的潜力，在我们校准后，结果要好得多，所有的颜色都低于DeltaE-2000的重要偏差3。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
16.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6.4 ms rise
16.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15.7 ms rise
32.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

当然，哑光屏幕表面在户外也有帮助，你可以在阴天舒适地工作，但在非常明亮的日子里，显示屏需要更亮一点。

性能 - Alder Lake &GeForce RTX

测试条件

像往常一样，联想提供了自己的电源设置，可以通过预装的Vantage软件或Fn+P组合键来设置。我们在下面的表格中列出了CPU和GPU各自的TDP/TGP值。我们使用高性能 设置进行测试。

性能模式	CPU负载	GPU负载	压力测试	最大风扇音量
节省电池	64 -> 20瓦	20瓦	CPU: 20瓦GPU : 20瓦	30.5 dB(A)
智能冷却	72 -> 35瓦	36瓦	CPU: 24瓦GPU :36瓦	43.7 dB(A)
高性能	80 -> 55瓦	60瓦	CPU: 20瓦GPU :50 瓦	47 dB(A)

处理器

芯片酷睿i7-12700H是英特尔目前Alder Lake一代的快速处理器，它依赖于一个具有6个快速性能和8个效率核心的混合架构。由于高功率限制，ThinkBook 16 G4+的性能产量非常好，CPU性能优于对手。即使在持续负载的情况下，该处理器仍保持在55瓦，并提供良好的效果。然而，在电池模式下，最大消耗被限制在70瓦，然后迅速达到64瓦，这就是为什么不插电时，多核性能降低了~12%。更多的CPU基准测试可在这里.

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2224 (2142.59-2433.83)

Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1998 (1901.59-2430.28)

Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H: Ø922 (904.81-1019.24)

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX; Settings: Full Speed Mode: Ø2037 (2029.74-2050.23)

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX; Settings Performance Mode: Ø1945 (1916.35-2019.28)

Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H; Performance: Ø1777 (1730.55-2218.28)

Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H; Balanced: Ø1672 (1578.91-2216.93)

Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P: Ø1115 (963.74-1308.56)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H	84.4 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12700H	82.2 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	80.9 pt
Average of class Multimedia	80.8 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	76 pt
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	70.6 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P	65.3 pt
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H	46.7 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H	15812 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (4032 - 19330, n=63)	15636 Points -1%
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=100, last 2 years)	15387 Points -3%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	14704 (12621.1^min - 14704.4^max) Points -7%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	12309 Points -22%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	12031 Points -24%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	11202 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P	10278 Points -35%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H	6051 Points -62%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H	1822 Points
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	1784 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P	1778 Points -2%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	1766 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (778 - 1826, n=62)	1758 Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=91, last 2 years)	1757 Points -4%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	1495 Points -18%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	1451 Points -20%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H	1341 Points -26%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H	6087 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1576 - 7407, n=63)	5933 Points -3%
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=86, last 2 years)	5683 Points -7%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	5648 Points -7%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	4792 Points -21%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	4662 Points -23%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	4248 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P	3947 Points -35%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H	2349 Points -61%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H	702 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P	680 Points -3%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	680 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (300 - 704, n=63)	679 Points -3%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	672 Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=86, last 2 years)	652 Points -7%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	576 Points -18%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	573 Points -18%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H	557 Points -21%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1379 - 2916, n=69)	2517 Points +3%
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=90, last 2 years)	2435 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H	2434 (2142.59^min - 2433.83^max) Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	2430 (1901.59^min - 2430.28^max) Points 0%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	2218 (1730.6^min - 2218^max) Points -9%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	2217 (1578.91^min - 2216.93^max) Points -9%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	2050 (2029.74^min - 2050.23^max) Points -16%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	2019 (1916.35^min - 2019.28^max) Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P	1309 (963.74^min - 1308.56^max) Points -46%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H	1019 (904.81^min - 1019.24^max) Points -58%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H	263 Points
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	257 Points -2%
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=86, last 2 years)	257 Points -2%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	254 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (113 - 263, n=64)	253 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P	244 Points -7%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	242 Points -8%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	240 Points -9%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H	214 Points -19%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H	507 Seconds * -129%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P	359 Seconds * -62%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	286 Seconds * -29%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	256 Seconds * -16%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	249 Seconds * -13%
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=84, last 2 years)	253 Seconds * -14%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	235 Seconds * -6%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (168 - 732, n=62)	225 Seconds * -2%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H	221 Seconds *

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H	64319 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (22844 - 73067, n=62)	60292 MIPS -6%
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years)	60265 MIPS -6%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	59929 MIPS -7%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	58576 MIPS -9%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	56729 MIPS -12%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	50976 MIPS -21%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P	41297 MIPS -36%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H	24722 MIPS -62%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	5865 MIPS +3%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	5826 MIPS +3%
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years)	5722 MIPS +1%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	5716 MIPS +1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H	5667 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2743 - 5972, n=62)	5648 MIPS 0%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	5570 MIPS -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P	5435 MIPS -4%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H	4813 MIPS -15%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H	12166 Points
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=86, last 2 years)	11967 Points -2%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	11887 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (5144 - 13745, n=63)	11729 Points -4%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	11321 Points -7%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	8479 Points -30%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	8355 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P	7270 Points -40%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H	5955 Points -51%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2342, n=86, last 2 years)	1818 Points +3%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	1777 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H	1770 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P	1745 Points -1%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	1733 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (803 - 1851, n=63)	1732 Points -2%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	1553 Points -12%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	1542 Points -13%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H	1492 Points -16%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H	17.8 fps
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (4.67 - 21.8, n=63)	16.7 fps -6%
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years)	16.4 fps -8%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	16.3 fps -8%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	15.5 fps -13%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	14.9 fps -16%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	13.8 fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P	11.5 fps -35%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H	7.91 fps -56%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	53.2 s * -14%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	50.4 s * -8%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H	50 s * -8%
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=80, last 2 years)	49.6 s * -7%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H	46.5 s *
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	46.1 s * +1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (34.2 - 95.3, n=62)	45.7 s * +2%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P	43.5 s * +6%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	36.4 s * +22%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H	0.59 sec * -28%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	0.4965 sec * -8%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	0.4851 sec * -5%
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years)	0.484 sec * -5%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	0.473 sec * -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (0.4441 - 1.052, n=62)	0.4723 sec * -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P	0.4687 sec * -2%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4601 sec *
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4509 sec * +2%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2434 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

211 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

263 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

6087 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

702 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1822 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

15812 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	91 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	87.6 pt
Average of class Multimedia	86.9 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	78.6 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12700H	77.1 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	75.2 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P, A350M	47.9 pt
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	45.6 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	14432 KRay/s
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years)	14429 KRay/s 0%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	14314 KRay/s -1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	14226 KRay/s -1%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	12734 KRay/s -12%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	11042 KRay/s -23%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2585 - 17957, n=62)	10834 KRay/s -25%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	6369 KRay/s -56%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P, A350M	5722 KRay/s -60%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	91157 Points +24%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	89329 Points +21%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	73573 Points
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years)	72714 Points -1%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	63563 Points -14%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	56156 Points -24%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12439 - 90760, n=62)	52825 Points -28%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	27391 Points -63%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P, A350M	16379 Points -78%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	3456 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years)	3389 MB/s -2%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	3134 MB/s -9%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	3086 MB/s -11%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (833 - 4242, n=62)	3077 MB/s -11%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	2892 MB/s -16%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2693 MB/s -22%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	1847 MB/s -47%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P, A350M	1194 MB/s -65%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	101919 Points
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	101123 Points -1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	99898 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (57923 - 103202, n=62)	97916 Points -4%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	97156 Points -5%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	92646 Points -9%
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years)	90849 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P, A350M	73100 Points -28%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	43565 Points -57%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	12542 Points +29%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	12322 Points +27%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	9699 Points
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years)	9329 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (3249 - 9939, n=62)	9055 Points -7%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	8567 Points -12%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7567 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P, A350M	6261 Points -35%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	4381 Points -55%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	50215 Points +44%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	49588 Points +42%
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years)	36169 Points +4%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	34856 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	31113 Points -11%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (7135 - 44760, n=62)	27939 Points -20%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	27706 Points -21%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	16659 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P, A350M	11903 Points -66%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	123333 MB/s +75%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	122013 MB/s +73%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	99760 MB/s +42%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (31839 - 144360, n=62)	85388 MB/s +21%
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years)	75995 MB/s +8%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	70412 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	65597 MB/s -7%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	59851 MB/s -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P, A350M	41262 MB/s -41%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	996 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (305 - 1171, n=62)	970 MB/s -3%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	969 MB/s -3%
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years)	935 MB/s -6%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	797 MB/s -20%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	787 MB/s -21%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	721 MB/s -28%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P, A350M	678 MB/s -32%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	330 MB/s -67%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years)	7836 KRay/s +6%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	7578 KRay/s +2%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	7538 KRay/s +2%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	7398 KRay/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	6747 KRay/s -9%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1437 - 9692, n=62)	5986 KRay/s -19%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5951 KRay/s -20%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	3536 KRay/s -52%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P, A350M	3333 KRay/s -55%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years)	40459 MPixel/s +3%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P, A350M	39374 MPixel/s 0%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	39292 MPixel/s
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	38728 MPixel/s -1%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	36644 MPixel/s -7%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	35147 MPixel/s -11%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12863 - 52207, n=62)	33149 MPixel/s -16%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	20450 MPixel/s -48%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	19978 MPixel/s -49%

系统性能

在日常使用中，ThinkBook 16 G4+是一台反应极为迅速的笔记本电脑，鉴于其强大的组件，人们不应担心在未来几年出现性能瓶颈。我们无法在我们的评测样本中运行合成PCMark 10，因为它总是崩溃，尽管重新安装了几个程序，也重新安装了驱动程序。这是我们在测试过程中遇到的唯一问题，其他基准测试的结果非常好，符合预期。

CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Jetstream 2: Total Score
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Octane V2: Total Score
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF

CrossMark / Overall
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1864 Points +4%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	1793 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile ()	1793 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	1740 Points -3%
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2184, n=87, last 2 years)	1703 Points -5%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-11320H, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1317 Points -27%

CrossMark / Productivity
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1790 Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	1709 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile ()	1709 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	1651 Points -3%
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=87, last 2 years)	1616 Points -5%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-11320H, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1348 Points -21%

CrossMark / Creativity
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1959 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	1959 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile ()	1959 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	1916 Points -2%
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2594, n=87, last 2 years)	1909 Points -3%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-11320H, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1358 Points -31%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1812 Points +14%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	1589 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile ()	1589 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	1523 Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=87, last 2 years)	1435 Points -10%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-11320H, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1121 Points -29%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=84, last 2 years)	312 Points +8%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	291 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	291 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	290 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile ()	290 Points 0%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	286 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 A350M, i7-1260P, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	281 Points -3%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-11320H, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	243 Points -16%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	264 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	262 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile ()	262 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 353, n=76, last 2 years)	259 Points -1%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	258 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 A350M, i7-1260P, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	249 Points -5%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-11320H, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	202 Points -23%

Jetstream 2 / Total Score
Average of class Multimedia (150.6 - 374, n=55, last 2 years)	288 Points +9%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	265.205 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	264 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile ()	264 Points 0%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	260.4 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 A350M, i7-1260P, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	236.5 Points -10%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-11320H, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	204.59 Points -23%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-11320H, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	680 ms * -31%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	602 ms * -16%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	598 ms * -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 A350M, i7-1260P, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	540 ms * -4%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	530 ms * -2%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	524 ms * -1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	518 ms *
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile ()	518 ms * -0%
Average of class Multimedia (254 - 1016, n=88, last 2 years)	510 ms * +2%

Octane V2 / Total Score
Average of class Multimedia (43921 - 119954, n=44, last 2 years)	91225 Points +3%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	89979 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	88824 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile ()	88824 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 A350M, i7-1260P, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	84517 Points -5%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-11320H, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	67714 Points -24%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	53.2 s * -14%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	50.4 s * -8%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-11320H, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	50 s * -8%
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=80, last 2 years)	49.6 s * -7%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	46.5 s *
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile ()	46.5 s * -0%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	46.1 s * +1%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 A350M, i7-1260P, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	43.5 s * +6%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	36.4 s * +22%

* ... smaller is better

» No benchmarks for this notebook found!

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years)	68580 MB/s +7%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	63957 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P, A350M	63887 MB/s 0%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	58627 MB/s -8%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	55961 MB/s -13%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	54375 MB/s -15%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (25615 - 80511, n=62)	53891 MB/s -16%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	42356 MB/s -34%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	41740 MB/s -35%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	70337 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years)	69599 MB/s -1%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	62046 MB/s -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P, A350M	61806 MB/s -12%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (25586 - 79442, n=62)	57340 MB/s -18%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	57124 MB/s -19%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	52799 MB/s -25%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	47593 MB/s -32%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	47535 MB/s -32%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years)	69752 MB/s +19%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P, A350M	66799 MB/s +14%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	63323 MB/s +8%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	58689 MB/s 0%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	58671 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	57432 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (23679 - 88660, n=62)	54793 MB/s -7%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	44854 MB/s -24%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	44033 MB/s -25%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	114.1 ns * -4%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	110.2 ns *
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	109.5 ns * +1%
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years)	106.6 ns * +3%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	94.7 ns * +14%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (76.2 - 133.9, n=60)	77.8 ns * +29%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	75.9 ns * +31%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	74.7 ns * +32%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P, A350M	0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

在我们的标准化延迟测试中（网页浏览、4K YouTube播放、CPU负载），ThinkBook 16 G4+显示出目前版本的严重限制，因此不适合使用实时音频应用程序。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-11320H, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	40006 μs * -692%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	5050.2 μs *
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	4336 μs * +14%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	989.5 μs * +80%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 A350M, i7-1260P, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	873.4 μs * +83%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	824.9 μs * +84%

* ... smaller is better

医学专家

ThinkBook 16 G4+为SSD提供了两个M.2-2280插槽，其中一个使用快速的PCIe 4.0连接，另一个使用PCIe 3.0。我们的评测样本中安装了一个紧凑的美光2450（M.2-2242），这已经是一个PCIe 4.0固态硬盘，但这个硬盘不是最快的，因为制造商指定的最大传输速率为3.6GB/s。最终的结果是，你有一个PCIe 4.0固态硬盘的PCIe 3.0速度。然而，这在实践中没有真正的限制，即使在长时间的负载下，性能仍然稳定。该固态硬盘的容量为1TB，在第一次启动后仍有916GB可用。更多的SSD基准测试可在这里.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3364.9 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3240.5 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 455.91 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 580.76 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 58.74 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 175.2 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 423.18 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1017.02 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia	87.4 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	75.6 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	73.2 pt
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	70.2 pt
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	65.2 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	56.8 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	53.8 pt
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	51.9 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Average of class Multimedia (1629 - 4861, n=76, last 2 years)	2970 MB/s +40%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	2355 (2335.33^min - 2354.8^max) MB/s +11%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2188 (2181.67^min - 2187.54^max) MB/s +3%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1817 (1802.12^min - 1816.62^max) MB/s -14%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	2124 (2104.91^min - 2123.73^max) MB/s
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK (1926 - 2124, n=3)	2016 MB/s -5%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	2012 (2006.14^min - 2011.76^max) MB/s -5%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1248 (1029.95^min - 1247.81^max) MB/s -41%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1188 (1150.29^min - 1187.97^max) MB/s -44%
seq write
Average of class Multimedia (463 - 5711, n=76, last 2 years)	3092 MB/s +16%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	2677 (2601.31^min - 2676.6^max) MB/s
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK (2459 - 2750, n=3)	2629 MB/s -2%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2307 (2289.46^min - 2306.66^max) MB/s -14%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2294 (2276.61^min - 2294.26^max) MB/s -14%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	2020 (1893.72^min - 2020.34^max) MB/s -25%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1706 (1686.51^min - 1705.56^max) MB/s -36%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1438 (1113.25^min - 1437.81^max) MB/s -46%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	790 (614.7^min - 789.79^max) MB/s -70%
seq q8 t1 read
Average of class Multimedia (2132 - 7126, n=76, last 2 years)	5486 MB/s +62%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	3596 (2753.83^min - 3595.84^max) MB/s +6%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	3593 (3365.09^min - 3593.05^max) MB/s +6%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	3377 (3030.2^min - 3376.62^max) MB/s
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK (3314 - 3377, n=3)	3346 MB/s -1%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	2883 (2661.83^min - 2882.85^max) MB/s -15%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	2569 (2176.89^min - 2569.43^max) MB/s -24%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	2139 (1967.18^min - 2139.1^max) MB/s -37%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1655 (1484.75^min - 1655.12^max) MB/s -51%
seq q8 t1 write
Average of class Multimedia (555 - 6898, n=76, last 2 years)	4169 MB/s +29%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	3241 (3226.47^min - 3240.54^max) MB/s
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK (3174 - 3241, n=3)	3208 MB/s -1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	3075 (2743.91^min - 3075.2^max) MB/s -5%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	3075 (2824.22^min - 3074.7^max) MB/s -5%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	2752 (2520.98^min - 2752.46^max) MB/s -15%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1911 (1287.86^min - 1911.3^max) MB/s -41%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1205 (1166.44^min - 1205.44^max) MB/s -63%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	871 (861.72^min - 871.3^max) MB/s -73%
4k q1 t1 read
Average of class Multimedia (14.6 - 97.7, n=76, last 2 years)	62.9 MB/s +3%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	62.7 (61.51^min - 62.72^max) MB/s +2%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	61.2 (59.86^min - 61.21^max) MB/s
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	54.8 (54.64^min - 54.79^max) MB/s -10%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	54.1 (53.74^min - 54.14^max) MB/s -12%
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK (46 - 61.2, n=3)	52 MB/s -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	47.7 (43.46^min - 47.72^max) MB/s -22%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	43.2 (40.19^min - 43.18^max) MB/s -29%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	43.1 (42.42^min - 43.05^max) MB/s -30%
4k q1 t1 write
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	273 (267.01^min - 272.55^max) MB/s +45%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	188.2 (185.67^min - 188.22^max) MB/s 0%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	187.8 (180.25^min - 187.75^max) MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (69.4 - 378, n=76, last 2 years)	170.9 MB/s -9%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	162.6 (156.2^min - 162.6^max) MB/s -13%
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK (130 - 187.8, n=3)	155.5 MB/s -17%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	123.5 (122.77^min - 123.54^max) MB/s -34%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	123 (122.76^min - 123.26^max) MB/s -35%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	122 (121.01^min - 121.98^max) MB/s -35%
4k q32 t16 read
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1391 (1387.88^min - 1390.66^max) MB/s +51%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1388 (1352.05^min - 1388.07^max) MB/s +50%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1329 (1280.62^min - 1328.75^max) MB/s +44%
Average of class Multimedia (295 - 4881, n=76, last 2 years)	1357 MB/s +47%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	923 (913.61^min - 922.81^max) MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	865 (859.56^min - 865.01^max) MB/s -6%
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK (666 - 923, n=3)	818 MB/s -11%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	778 (509.9^min - 778.41^max) MB/s -16%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	652 (637.52^min - 651.63^max) MB/s -29%
4k q32 t16 write
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1241 (928.82^min - 1240.76^max) MB/s +148%
Average of class Multimedia (192.1 - 4074, n=76, last 2 years)	1025 MB/s +105%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	830 (821.68^min - 830.14^max) MB/s +66%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	640 (475.63^min - 639.97^max) MB/s +28%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	508 (506.41^min - 508.29^max) MB/s +1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	493 (490.72^min - 493.23^max) MB/s -2%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	501 (443.18^min - 501.38^max) MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	408 (386.27^min - 408.12^max) MB/s -19%
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK (294 - 501, n=3)	381 MB/s -24%

AS SSD
Score Total
Average of class Multimedia (2033 - 9972, n=73, last 2 years)	5061 Points +7%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	4995 Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	4750 Points
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK (3758 - 4750, n=3)	4279 Points -10%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	4039 Points -15%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	3229 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	2580 Points -46%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	2529 Points -47%
Score Read
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1720 Points +33%
Average of class Multimedia (669 - 3501, n=73, last 2 years)	1630 Points +26%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1477 Points +14%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1340 Points +3%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	1296 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	1190 Points -8%
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK (986 - 1296, n=3)	1130 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1066 Points -18%
Score Write
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	2826 Points
Average of class Multimedia (656 - 4813, n=73, last 2 years)	2660 Points -6%
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK (2297 - 2826, n=3)	2599 Points -8%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2446 Points -13%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1839 Points -35%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1252 Points -56%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	990 Points -65%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	762 Points -73%
Seq Read
Average of class Multimedia (1718 - 5730, n=73, last 2 years)	4248 MB/s +50%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2913 MB/s +3%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	2825 MB/s
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	2802 MB/s -1%
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK (2717 - 2825, n=3)	2767 MB/s -2%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	2744.12 MB/s -3%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	2693.29 MB/s -5%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	2381 MB/s -16%
Seq Write
Average of class Multimedia (414 - 5651, n=73, last 2 years)	2749 MB/s +48%
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK (1852 - 2154, n=3)	1987 MB/s +7%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1879 MB/s +1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	1852 MB/s
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1806 MB/s -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1735 MB/s -6%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	1683.46 MB/s -9%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1559.79 MB/s -16%
4K Read
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	65.01 MB/s +11%
Average of class Multimedia (28.7 - 98.5, n=73, last 2 years)	61.6 MB/s +5%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	61.03 MB/s +4%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	58.44 MB/s
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	51.41 MB/s -12%
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK (45.1 - 58.4, n=3)	49.7 MB/s -15%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	47.67 MB/s -18%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	44.99 MB/s -23%
4K Write
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	248.56 MB/s +9%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	227.47 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	197.81 MB/s -13%
Average of class Multimedia (66.5 - 328, n=73, last 2 years)	190.3 MB/s -16%
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK (131 - 227, n=3)	183.8 MB/s -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	163.48 MB/s -28%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	156.13 MB/s -31%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	101.5 MB/s -55%
4K-64 Read
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1382 MB/s +45%
Average of class Multimedia (350 - 2989, n=73, last 2 years)	1144 MB/s +20%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1135.53 MB/s +19%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1014.34 MB/s +6%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	954.65 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	855.48 MB/s -10%
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK (665 - 955, n=3)	803 MB/s -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	783.25 MB/s -18%
4K-64 Write
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	2413.44 MB/s
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK (1970 - 2413, n=3)	2216 MB/s -8%
Average of class Multimedia (411 - 4265, n=73, last 2 years)	2195 MB/s -9%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2164 MB/s -10%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	1402.68 MB/s -42%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	940.2 MB/s -61%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	653.05 MB/s -73%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	395.8 MB/s -84%
Access Time Read
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	0.078 ms * -200%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	0.073 ms * -181%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	0.065 ms * -150%
Average of class Multimedia (0.018 - 0.15, n=73, last 2 years)	0.0551 ms * -112%
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK (0.025 - 0.09, n=3)	0.047 ms * -81%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	0.044 ms * -69%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	0.026 ms *
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	0.025 ms * +4%
Access Time Write
Average Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK (0.131 - 0.132, n=3)	0.1317 ms * -1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	0.131 ms *
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	0.109 ms * +17%
Average of class Multimedia (0.013 - 0.414, n=73, last 2 years)	0.06104 ms * +53%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	0.06 ms * +54%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	0.028 ms * +79%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	0.023 ms * +82%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	0.016 ms * +88%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP: Ø3344 (3131.71-3361.3)

图形卡

在日常使用中，图形计算通常由处理器的集成化处理。Iris Xe Graphics G7。.专用的 NvidiaGeForce RTX 2050只有在较高的负载下才会自动开启。原则上，这个GPU是一个 GeForce MX570，但也支持RayTracing和DLSS。TGP被设置为最大50瓦，据此，另外10瓦可由处理器使用。我们观察到最大的核心时钟为1,762 MHz。

在合成基准测试中，RTX 2050的排名通常仅次于 RTX 3050，后者的工作效率更高一些。此外，在苛刻的测试中，该GPU的速度是Iris Xe Graphics G7的两倍多。在长时间的负载下，性能没有下降，因为苛刻的Time Spy 压力测试以99.7%轻松通过。

然而，在电池模式下，GPU的能量消耗被限制在30瓦，这导致性能下降15%。更多的GPU基准测试可在我们的技术部分.

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia (3505 - 60250, n=77, last 2 years)	20075 Points +34%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	18679 Points +25%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	16296 Points +9%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-12700H	14954 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (10598 - 15411, n=10)	12801 Points -14%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-11320H	11980 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Arc A350M, Intel Core i7-1260P	10687 Points -29%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-12700H	6944 Points -54%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	66662 Points +6%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-11320H	63775 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-12700H	63026 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (47225 - 66365, n=9)	57528 Points -9%
Average of class Multimedia (14679 - 130614, n=38, last 2 years)	56887 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Arc A350M, Intel Core i7-1260P	44006 Points -30%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	39886 Points -37%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-12700H	30101 Points -52%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (1835 - 46022, n=80, last 2 years)	14437 Points +40%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	13760 Points +33%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-12700H	10345 Points
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	10288 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (8249 - 10621, n=10)	9219 Points -11%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-11320H	9138 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Arc A350M, Intel Core i7-1260P	6800 Points -34%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-12700H	5710 Points -45%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (622 - 17620, n=81, last 2 years)	5446 Points +41%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	5352 Points +38%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	4747 Points +23%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-12700H	3868 Points
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-11320H	3281 Points -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (1072 - 3938, n=10)	3155 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Arc A350M, Intel Core i7-1260P	2731 Points -29%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-12700H	1747 Points -55%

Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	66819 Points +34%
Average of class Multimedia (10769 - 122560, n=85, last 2 years)	60173 Points +21%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	59053 Points +19%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	58722 Points +18%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-11320H	50997 Points +3%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-12700H	49723 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (42403 - 52623, n=10)	46696 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Arc A350M, Intel Core i7-1260P	20177 Points -59%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-12700H	19436 Points -61%
Vulkan Score 5.5
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	46471 Points +154%
Average of class Multimedia (2104 - 62587, n=46, last 2 years)	28640 Points +57%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Arc A350M, Intel Core i7-1260P	20768 Points +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (14448 - 35429, n=9)	19970 Points +9%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-12700H	19790 Points +8%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-12700H	18299 Points

V-Ray 5 Benchmark - GPU CUDA
Average of class Multimedia (274 - 1259, n=23, last 2 years)	883 mpaths
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-11320H	374 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (169 - 214, n=3)	198.3 mpaths

V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 - GPU
Average of class Multimedia (45 - 684, n=64, last 2 years)	270 mpaths +150%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	171 mpaths +58%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	171 mpaths +58%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-11320H	160 mpaths +48%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-12700H	108 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (66 - 109, n=10)	89.8 mpaths -17%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-12700H	66 mpaths -39%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Arc A350M, Intel Core i7-1260P	56 mpaths -48%

Blender - v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (126 - 175, n=9)	148.3 Seconds * -13%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-12700H	131 Seconds *
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-11320H	125 Seconds * +5%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	84 Seconds * +36%
Average of class Multimedia (32 - 181, n=46, last 2 years)	74.5 Seconds * +43%

* ... smaller is better

3DMark Vantage P Result		52669 points
3DMark 11 Performance		15277 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		40781 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		9274 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		4300 points
Help

... in comparison

游戏性能

的游戏性能。RTX 2050很好，而ThinkBook 16 G4+再次排在RTX 2050的后面。 RTX 3050 Ti在许多情况下，也落后于 RTX 3050.因此，许多标题可以在全高清和高细节下顺利播放，在某些情况下，原生WQHD分辨率也是可能的。只有在要求较高的游戏中才需要减少FHD的细节，如《赛博点2077》。我们的Witcher 3 循环显示，在较长时间的游戏过程中，性能并没有下降。更多游戏基准测试可在这里.

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	108.4 (94^min) fps +41%
Average of class Multimedia (11.2 - 290, n=73, last 2 years)	100.8 fps +31%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	77 fps
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	70 fps -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (46.7 - 78, n=8)	60.2 fps -22%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	58.7 (16^min, 39.7^P0.1, 47.2^P1) fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A350M	41 fps -47%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	35 fps -55%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	57 (53^min) fps +49%
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years)	54 fps +41%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	48 fps +25%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	38.3 (35^min, 36^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (24.3 - 39.6, n=9)	33.1 fps -14%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	31.5 (27^min, 30^P1) fps -18%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A350M	18.4 (15^min, 17^P1) fps -52%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	14 (13^min, 13^P1) fps -63%

GTA V
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	75.4 (7.66^min, 50^P1) fps +43%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	63.9 (7.77^min, 43.5^P1) fps +21%
Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=80, last 2 years)	53.5 fps +1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	52.9 (14.3^min, 35.7^P1) fps
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	48 (6.2^min, 31.3^P1) fps -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (35.6 - 55.8, n=10)	45.8 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A350M	14.7 (1.712^min, 9.43^P1) fps -72%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10.8 (4.54^min, 6.45^P1) fps -80%
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	148.7 (9.03^min, 100^P1) fps +38%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	108.1 (28.6^min, 66.7^P1) fps
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	99.2 (13.6^min, 66.7^P1) fps -8%
Average of class Multimedia (11.9 - 186.1, n=81, last 2 years)	96.7 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (74 - 111.5, n=10)	91.6 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A350M	36.5 (1.957^min, 23.8^P1) fps -66%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	24.9 (8.88^min, 19.6^P1) fps -77%
2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Multimedia (8.23 - 97.6, n=36, last 2 years)	63.6 fps +71%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	53.4 (5.49^min, 37^P1) fps +43%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	37.3 (7.2^min, 25^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile ()	37.3 fps 0%

Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
1920x1080 High Preset
Average of class Multimedia (11.9 - 104, n=28, last 2 years)	56.9 fps +84%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	47.9 (17.4^min) fps +55%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	31 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (19.1 - 31, n=4)	27.1 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A350M	16.2 fps -48%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Multimedia (9.2 - 103, n=28, last 2 years)	51 fps +104%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	39.5 (9.4^min) fps +58%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	25 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (16.8 - 27.4, n=4)	23.6 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A350M	11.6 fps -54%

Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	148 (128.8^min) fps +6%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	140 (123.8^min) fps
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	131 (115.3^min) fps -6%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	125 (109.8^min) fps -11%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	119.4 (101.6^min) fps -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (70.9 - 140, n=10)	114.5 fps -18%
Average of class Multimedia (28 - 196.9, n=82, last 2 years)	103.8 fps -26%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	69.5 (62.3^min) fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A350M	63.9 (42.5^min) fps -54%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	140.7 (122.6^min) fps +9%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	129.6 (111.2^min) fps
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	126 (111.1^min) fps -3%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	119 (103.2^min) fps -8%
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	116 (98.8^min) fps -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (66.1 - 130.1, n=10)	106.6 fps -18%
Average of class Multimedia (26.3 - 179.9, n=82, last 2 years)	96.4 fps -26%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	63.5 (56.9^min) fps -51%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A350M	62.1 (41.4^min) fps -52%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1920x1080 High Quality
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	54.1 fps +29%
Average of class Multimedia (6.53 - 141.8, n=81, last 2 years)	50.9 fps +22%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	43 fps +3%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	41.8 fps
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	35.9 fps -14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (24.8 - 42.9, n=10)	35.1 fps -16%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	26.8 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A350M	20.7 fps -50%
2560x1440 High Quality
Average of class Multimedia (9.85 - 132.7, n=46, last 2 years)	50.4 fps +74%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	38.1 fps +31%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	30.9 fps +7%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	29 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (20.5 - 29, n=3)	24.8 fps -14%

Far Cry 5
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Average of class Multimedia (18 - 154, n=58, last 2 years)	73.2 fps +18%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	65 (49^min) fps +5%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	62 fps
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	56 fps -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (35 - 71, n=5)	54.6 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A350M	37 fps -40%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Multimedia (17 - 145, n=58, last 2 years)	68.6 fps +14%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	62 (50^min) fps +3%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	60 fps
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	59 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (34 - 66, n=5)	51.6 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A350M	35 fps -42%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Multimedia (26 - 117, n=31, last 2 years)	71.2 fps +83%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	50 fps +28%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	39 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (35 - 39, n=2)	37 fps -5%

F1 2021
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Multimedia (46 - 264, n=16, last 2 years)	153.7 fps +54%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	105 (93^min, 79^P1) fps +6%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	99.5 (65^min, 60^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (66.2 - 107.6, n=3)	91.1 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A350M	52.2 (43^min, 41^P1) fps -48%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	43 (36^min, 35^P1) fps -57%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Multimedia (31.5 - 149.8, n=15, last 2 years)	90.1 fps +104%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	52.3 fps +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (36.1 - 52.3, n=3)	44.2 fps 0%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	44.1 (31^min, 31^P1) fps
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	30 (23^min, 23^P1) fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A350M	21.1 (18^min, 17^P1) fps -52%

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile: Ø38.3 (35-41)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)	179.1	175.3	108.1	52.9	37.3
The Witcher 3 (2015)	216	139	77	38.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	167.4	153.9	140	129.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	109.1	61	41.8		29
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	139.6	106.4	90.1
Far Cry 5 (2018)	118	68	62	60	39
Strange Brigade (2018)	196.9	86.8	71.5	63.1	46.5
F1 2021 (2021)	229	130.6	99.5	44.1	28.2
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022)	49	41	31	25

排放 - 游戏需要耳机

噪声

当空转或低负荷时，这两个风扇几乎总是保持停用状态，即使在高性能 模式下也是如此。然而，在这种模式下，它们在更高的负载下迅速达到最大速度，对应的噪音水平为47 dB(A)。这已经很明显可以听到了，因此我们建议在游戏时使用耳机。在智能冷却 模式下，笔记本电脑只是在游戏时稍微安静一些，略低于44 dB(A)。如果你对性能要求不高，你可以很容易地切换到省电模式，因为风扇很少启动，几乎听不到，但由于功率降低，这种模式很难适合游戏。没有检测到任何电子噪音。

Noise Level

Idle		24.2 / 24.2 / 24.2 dB(A)
Load		47 / 47 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.2 dB(A)

	Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK	Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-11320H, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD	Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 A350M, i7-1260P, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
Noise		-6%	-3%	-5%	2%	-4%
off / environment *	24.2	23.3 4%	25.4 -5%	26 -7%	24.2 -0%	24.3 -0%
Idle Minimum *	24.2	25.7 -6%	25.4 -5%	27 -12%	24.2 -0%	24.3 -0%
Idle Average *	24.2	26.1 -8%	25.4 -5%	27 -12%	25.8 -7%	24.3 -0%
Idle Maximum *	24.2	30.6 -26%	27.8 -15%	27.5 -14%	30.5 -26%	29.8 -23%
Load Average *	47	46.2 2%	41 13%	41.7 11%	39.8 15%	47.5 -1%
Witcher 3 ultra *	47	49.2 -5%			39.8 15%	47.5 -1%
Load Maximum *	47	49.4 -5%	47 -0%	45.3 4%	39.8 15%	47.5 -1%

* ... smaller is better

温度

铝制外壳在低负荷下根本不发热。只有在游戏或压力测试中才会明显发热。在基本单元的上侧，我们在中间/上部的键盘区域记录了大约42°C的温度，这在打字时也很明显，但并不令人不快。在底部，机箱后部中央区域有一个热点，我们在那里测量到了大约50℃。这里应该避免皮肤直接接触金属表面。

在压力测试中，处理器以全功率启动，几分钟后降至20瓦，而显卡则稳定在50瓦并保持在这一水平。因此，GPU在高性能模式下被优先考虑，而处理器在智能冷却 模式下被允许消耗更多一点的功率（24/36瓦）。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


42.7 °C	42.9 °C	40 °C
40.6 °C	41.9 °C	34.4 °C
28.1 °C	28.3 °C	27.5 °C

Maximum: 42.9 °C
Average: 36.3 °C


36.2 °C	50.6 °C	42.9 °C
31.5 °C	45 °C	39.3 °C
28.3 °C	31.1 °C	30.3 °C

Maximum: 50.6 °C
Average: 37.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 56.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


26 °C	25.9 °C	25.5 °C
25.7 °C	25.9 °C	24.7 °C
25 °C	24.5 °C	24.8 °C

Maximum: 26 °C
Average: 25.3 °C


25.6 °C	26.5 °C	26.5 °C
25.1 °C	25.9 °C	26.2 °C
24.7 °C	25 °C	25.1 °C

Maximum: 26.5 °C
Average: 25.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 27.4 °C | Room Temperature 20.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


42.5 °C	42.7 °C	38.8 °C
40.5 °C	42 °C	34.3 °C
28.1 °C	28.2 °C	27.6 °C

Maximum: 42.7 °C
Average: 36.1 °C


43 °C	50.3 °C	47.4 °C
31.8 °C	42.9 °C	38.3 °C
29 °C	30.9 °C	29.7 °C

Maximum: 50.3 °C
Average: 38.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 51.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.6 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.3 °C / 82.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+0.5 °C / 0.9 F).

	Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A350M
Heat		-7%	-13%	3%	-3%	1%
Maximum Upper Side *	42.9	46 -7%	52.4 -22%	39.4 8%	41.8 3%	44.6 -4%
Maximum Bottom *	50.6	45.8 9%	50 1%	43.6 14%	47.3 7%	47.5 6%
Idle Upper Side *	26	29.2 -12%	30.3 -17%	27.6 -6%	28.3 -9%	25.8 1%
Idle Bottom *	26.5	31 -17%	30.4 -15%	27.5 -4%	30.2 -14%	26.1 2%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

联想为ThinkBook 16 G4+配备了两个立体声扬声器（2x 2瓦），它们位于底座的前部区域，将声音向下引导。声音方面，这些模块的表现一般，与直接竞争对手戴尔Inspiron 16 Plus相当。戴尔Inspiron 16 Plus，因为这两个型号都缺乏力量和低音。对于背景音乐或偶尔的视频，声音质量是足够的，甚至对于语音再现（如会议）也非常好，这要归功于高音/高音的线性再现。然而，在游戏或电影之夜，应使用外部扬声器或耳机。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理--具有良好耐力的ThinkBook

消耗功率

考虑到大型WQHD面板，ThinkBook的空闲消耗值完全可以接受，最大约为12瓦。然而，附带的100瓦电源在负载情况下很快就成为一个限制因素。在极端情况下，WiYNFO工具在压力测试开始时输出的最大总消耗量为162瓦，在评估数据后，我们发现在短时间内还需要从电池中提取多达70瓦的能量。几分钟后，情况趋于稳定，但如果电池不得不在负载下一次又一次地被挖掘，这肯定不利于电池寿命。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.34 / 0.69 Watt
Idle	5 / 11.2 / 11.6 Watt
Load	89.3 / 102 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G, IPS, 3072x1920, 16"	Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 i5-11320H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU, , 1920x1080, 16.1"	Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.1"	Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"	Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 i7-1260P, A350M, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile	Average of class Multimedia
Power Consumption		-29%	0%	-22%	12%	30%	11%	-10%
Idle Minimum *	5	6.8 -36%	7 -40%	8.2 -64%	6.1 -22%	4 20%	5.11 ?(4 - 8.8, n=10) -2%	6.78 ?(2.17 - 21.1, n=86, last 2 years) -36%
Idle Average *	11.2	9.6 14%	10.1 10%	16.2 -45%	10.6 5%	7.8 30%	9.15 ?(5.5 - 14.3, n=10) 18%	11.3 ?(4.6 - 30, n=86, last 2 years) -1%
Idle Maximum *	11.6	17 -47%	15 -29%	19.7 -70%	11.5 1%	8.5 27%	11.2 ?(8 - 18.4, n=10) 3%	13.4 ?(5.6 - 30.4, n=86, last 2 years) -16%
Load Average *	89.3	117.5 -32%	63.3 29%	65.8 26%	65.5 27%	59.1 34%	70.6 ?(49.3 - 89.3, n=10) 21%	71.1 ?(14.3 - 147, n=84, last 2 years) 20%
Witcher 3 ultra *	83	113.1 -36%	63.3 24%	65.6 21%	61.2 26%	56.7 32%
Load Maximum *	102	137.4 -35%	94 8%	104 -2%	68.4 33%	62.4 39%	87.4 ?(66 - 107.1, n=10) 14%	117.3 ?(47.7 - 270, n=85, last 2 years) -15%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø83 (69.8-98.9)

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø97.1 (75.5-102.1)

Power cosumption with an external monitor

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø87.9 (23.6-102.7)

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø101.7 (96.8-102.1)

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø94.9 (83.5-102.1)

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø81 (72.2-92.3)

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø72.3 (63.9-86.9)

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø7.32 (6.65-10)

电池寿命

71瓦特的电池允许相当长的运行时间，因为我们的评测样品在WLAN测试中持续了6:43小时和8:09小时，这取决于屏幕亮度。在150cd/m²（相当于最大亮度的71%）的情况下，视频播放甚至可以超过12小时。与WLAN测试的这一巨大差异再次表明，目前的Alder Lake CPU的工作效率并不特别高，即使是在单核负荷下（即上网时）。

在设备开启的情况下，完整的充电过程大约需要100分钟，充电曲线呈线性，但也有一个快速充电选项，只需要73分钟（28分钟后已经可以达到60%）。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Edge 105)		8h 9min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 105)		6h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12h 37min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 30min

	Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 71 Wh	Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 86 Wh	Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 i5-11320H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 58.7 Wh	Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 96 Wh	Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh	Samsung Galaxy Book2 15 i7-1260P, A350M, 54 Wh	Average of class Multimedia
Battery Runtime		-3%	-11%	6%	-13%	-5%	15%
H.264	757		506 -33%			635 -16%	821 ?(319 - 1481, n=52, last 2 years) 8%
WiFi v1.3	489	575 18%	484 -1%	675 38%	424 -13%	494 1%	628 ?(279 - 1204, n=84, last 2 years) 28%
Load	90	69 -23%	90 0%	66 -27%		90 0%	97.8 ?(39 - 212, n=64, last 2 years) 9%

Pros

+ 铝制外壳

+ 良好的哑光IPS屏幕

+ 非常好的系统性能

+ 2个M.2 2280插槽

+ 大量的端口，包括Thunderbolt 4

+ 合适的电池寿命

Cons

- 峰值负载时电源不足

- RAM被焊接了

结论 - ThinkBook 16 G4+是一款非常好的多媒体笔记本电脑

联想ThinkBook 16 G4+是一款非常扎实的多媒体笔记本，除了在高峰负荷时电源较弱外，几乎没有批评的地方。基本单元可以更稳定一些，联想在键盘方面也有改进的余地，但这些要点不会阻止我们购买它。

大型16英寸IPS显示屏提供了非常好的图像画质，不含PWM，尽管是哑光表面，但明亮的表面不会出现颗粒感。虽然这里缺乏额外的功能，如HDR、更高的刷新率或扩展的色彩空间，但该面板还是完全能够满足其预期的目的。性能值，由于结合了英特尔酷睿i7-12700H和一个 NvidiaGeForce RTX 2050的组合，性能非常好。即使是游戏，对ThinkBook来说也不是一个问题。

在ThinkBook 16 G4+中，联想提供了一个非常好的多媒体笔记本，它没有任何主要的弱点，在日常使用中以其广泛的连接性、高性能和良好的IPS显示屏给人留下深刻印象。

竞争对手的设备，如戴尔 Inspiron 16 Plus或 Acer Swift X，提供稍快和更有效的GPU，即 RTX 3050和 RTX 3050 Ti，但在较暗的显示器上却很难做到。总的来说，ThinkBook 16 G4+是一款非常坚实的笔记本电脑，从所有方面考虑，它都领先于其竞争对手。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

联想ThinkBook 16 G4+在全球的供货情况似乎很稀少。例如，联想的官方网站列出了这款笔记本电脑在France(1,079.00欧元),意大利(1,659.00欧元),新加坡(SG$1,504.07）和阿拉伯联合酋长国。

这份清单并不详尽。价格截至20.09.2022，可能会有变化。

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP - 09/20/2022 v7 ^(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

80 / 98 → 81%

Keyboard

83%

Pointing Device

85%

Connectivity

73 / 80 → 91%

Weight

65 / 20-72 → 87%

Battery

85 / 95 → 89%

Display

90%

Games Performance

88 / 90 → 98%

Application Performance

93 / 90 → 100%

Temperature

87%

Noise

84 / 95 → 88%

Audio

75%

Camera

40 / 85 → 48%

Average

79%

88%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 1344 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 459232 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想ThinkBook 16 G4+评测。优秀的多媒体笔记本电脑，功率大

Andreas Osthoff, 2022-09-21 (Update: 2022-09-21)

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - 联想使用了铝材

尺寸比较

设备 - 带有Thunderbolt 4的ThinkBook

SD卡阅读器

沟通

网络摄像头

维护

输入设备 - 带有普通键盘的多媒体笔记本电脑

显示屏 - 哑光的WQHD IPS面板

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - Alder Lake &amp;GeForce RTX

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

系统性能

DPC延时

医学专家

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

排放 - 游戏需要耳机

噪声

温度

发言人

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP audio analysis

Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 audio analysis

能源管理--具有良好耐力的ThinkBook

消耗功率

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Power cosumption with an external monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 - ThinkBook 16 G4+是一款非常好的多媒体笔记本电脑

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison

性能 - Alder Lake &GeForce RTX