data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fe30/4fe30de2c2c3c760f35d1a1b6efb17c4ad25f0ef" alt="Teaser"
可升级性强,价格实惠:联想 ThinkPad E14 6 代 AMD 笔记本电脑评测
配备伦勃朗 R 的 ThinkPad E
对于想省钱的买家来说,入门级的联想 ThinkPad E14 6 代 AMD 是一个非常有吸引力的选择:它的价格比其他 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑更实惠,同时还具备该品牌的许多关键品质。但遗憾的是,其过时的 CPU 限制了其性能潜力。Benjamin Herzig, 👁 Benjamin Herzig (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇫🇷 ...
结论联想ThinkPad E14 G6很划算,但也有不足之处
入门级是笔记本电脑市场的一个难点,因为低价意味着必须在硬件方面做出许多牺牲。联想在联想ThinkPad E14 6代AMD笔记本电脑上找到了恰当的平衡点,在重要的方面保证了质量,而在不那么重要的方面节省了成本。联想 ThinkPad E14 以相当低的价格提供了良好的性能、出色的键盘和巨大的升级潜力。值得注意的是第二个开放式 M.2 SSD 插槽,这是连更昂贵的 T 系列都不具备的功能。
其中一项节约成本的措施就是缺少 Thunderbolt 或 USB4 端口。当然,屏幕的质量也很低劣,这一点在查看色域时尤为明显。如果用户想买到便宜的 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑,就必须接受这些妥协。
Pros
Cons
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 680M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $789.99 List Price: 1015 Euro | 1.6 kg | 21.5 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS LED | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 AMD Ryzen 7 7730U ⎘ AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ⎘ 24 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $626.55 Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 5 21... 2. $629.99 Lenovo Thinkpad E14 G6 Busin... 3. $705.95 Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 (A... List Price: 899€ | 1.4 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" 2240x1400 189 PPI IPS | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $683.00 Acer Swift Go 14 Intel Evo T... 2. $849.99 Acer Swift Go 14 Intel Evo T... 3. $799.99 Acer Swift Go 14 AI Copilot+... List Price: 1149 Euro | 1.3 kg | 16.55 mm | 14.50" 2560x1600 208 PPI IPS | |
Dell Latitude 3440 Intel Core i5-1345U ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $999.99 Dell Latitude 3440 Laptop 14... 2. $698.99 Dell Latitude 3440 Core i5.1... 3. $939.60 Dell Latitude 3440 14" Noteb... List Price: 1100 USD | 1.5 kg | 19.4 mm | 14.00" 1920x1080 157 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $820.95 List Price: 990 USD | 1.5 kg | 17.99 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
在联想 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑系列中,E ThinkPad 处于最底层。然而,这并不意味着 ThinkPad E 系列没有价值:它们让更多的人,包括学生和小型企业,能够买得起 ThinkPad 的设计。最后一个群体也是该系列笔记本电脑的主要目标。今天,我们测试的是 14 英寸机型--联想 ThinkPad E14 6 代。具体来说,我们将测试该设备的 AMD Ryzen 变体,因为我们已经评测了 ThinkPad E14 6 代英特尔.
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格:E 系列首次采用 Zen 3+
外壳:联想 ThinkPad E14 6 代塑料与铝合金的完美结合
ThinkPad 笔记本电脑以其始终如一的设计语言而著称,联想 ThinkPad E14 6 代 AMD 看起来也是如此。所有表面都是黑色的,就连宽条铰链也是如此。只有掌托上的 AMD 贴纸、银色 ThinkPad 徽标和红色 TrackPoint 以及相应 TrackPoint 按钮上的红色条纹格外显眼。机身侧面有倒角。机盖只有一个小的反向凹槽,而不是更高级的 ThinkPad 机型上的明显凹槽。
更昂贵的 ThinkPad 多采用镁和碳纤维等材料,而 ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 则由塑料和铝组合而成。这使机身具有足够的硬度,键盘区域也没有太多弯曲,但长期坚固性似乎更值得怀疑。
如前所述,整台笔记本电脑都是黑色的。只有掌托采用了光滑涂层,而底部和显示屏盖实际上是阳极氧化铝。屏幕前边框是粗糙的塑料。值得注意的是,这款笔记本电脑存在典型的污点问题,这也是大多数深色设计设备的通病--看起来油腻腻的,而且很快就会留下指纹。
铰链的开启角度为 180 度,单手无法完全打开。只有一点点晃动。
与前代设计相比,我们能够测试的是 联想 ThinkPad E14 4 代相比,E14 G6 的机身明显更加紧凑。但重量没有任何变化,E14 G6 仍然是最重的 14 英寸 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑之一。
连接性E14 的 AMD 变体仍缺少雷电接口
与 英特尔变体ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 AMD 缺乏 USB4/Thunderbolt 端口。两个 USB-C 端口用于充电,并且都有 DisplayPort 备用模式,但联想 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑不兼容任何 Thunderbolt 配件。
反过来,其余的端口选择也不错,有两个 USB-A 端口和 HDMI 加 RJ45 以太网。当然,除了 Thunderbolt 之外,唯一的改进就是 SD 读卡器。此外,如果联想能把其中一个 USB-C 端口放在右侧就更好了,这样设备就可以从两侧充电。
交流
联想在 Wi-Fi 网卡上节省了一些成本,使用了 RealTek 解决方案,而不是像更高级的 ThinkPad 那样使用更昂贵的英特尔或高通 Wi-Fi 网卡。RealTek 网卡支持 Wi-Fi 6E,但不支持最先进的 Wi-Fi 7 标准,E14 的某些型号甚至不支持 Wi-Fi 6E,只支持 Wi-Fi 6。这里使用的网卡的传输速度还算可以,尽管比不上高级 ThinkPad。
网络摄像头
ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 AMD 有三种不同的网络摄像头可供选择:1080p 带红外摄像头的 Windows Hello 网络摄像头、1080p 不带红外摄像头的网络摄像头和简单的 720p 网络摄像头。我们的评测机使用了包含红外网络摄像头的最佳选项。网络摄像头的质量可以接受,但仅此而已。笔记本电脑可以进行视频通话,但图像看起来模糊不清。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53cf6/53cf6fd42f2a6d45f24b19c2f622b8630a499e64" alt="ColorChecker"
安全
与 "真正的 "商用 ThinkPad 相比,联想 ThinkPad E14 的安全功能更为有限。该设备配备了指纹识别器、红外网络摄像头和 Kensington 锁插槽,但缺少企业机型上的智能卡读卡器。
配件
除了 65 W USB-C 充电器外,联想没有提供任何配件。
维护
两张面孔联想 ThinkPad E14 6 代 AMD 具有很强的可升级性。另一方面,它的可维修性却比其他 ThinkPad 差。
悖论?其实不然!ThinkPad 笔记本电脑的内部结构是模块化的--甚至连 Wi-Fi 卡都不是焊接的,除了用于放置出厂固态硬盘的 M.2-2242 插槽外,还有两个 SO-DIMM 插槽和一个空闲的 M.2-2280 插槽。该机型为用户提供了更多的升级选项,例如 ThinkPad T14 5 代.通过底盖可以接触到这些组件,底盖由 7 颗飞利浦螺钉和四侧的夹子固定。
另一方面,可维修性更差。这里的电池不是 CRU,这意味着客户在保修期内不能更换电池。此外,如果不更换掌托,键盘也无法更换。事实上,它是与键盘边框铆接在一起的,这意味着两部分都无法分离。这与 ThinkPad L14或 ThinkPad T14 等机型大相径庭,这两款机型的键盘都是用户可更换的,只需两颗螺丝即可固定到位。
可持续性
无塑料包装是 ThinkPad 的标准配置,E14 Gen 6 AMD 也采用了这种包装,甚至还可以堆肥。E 系列 ThinkPad 在使用可回收外壳材料方面没有那么先进,因为只有扬声器外壳等少数内部组件使用了可回收材料。就二氧化碳排放量而言,生产一台 ThinkPad E14 G6 的二氧化碳排放量为 165 千克/二氧化碳当量。这与大多数其他 ThinkPad 一致。也与其他 ThinkPad 一致:提供文本和视频两种形式的维护手册。既然是 ThinkPad,零部件供应情况应该不错,但由于不是企业机型,可能会比其他机型差一些。
保修
由于联想 ThinkPad E14 属于该品牌的经济型机型,因此联想只提供一年的保修服务。这种特定型号包括现场服务,但大多数机型只有带入保修。保修同样适用于国际市场,因为这是一款商务机,但不提供现场服务。如果额外付费,保修期可以延长,还可以增加意外损坏保护(ADP)等额外选项。
输入设备:ThinkPad 键盘依然出色
键盘
联想 ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 AMD 使用的键盘与更昂贵的 联想 ThinkPad T14 Gen 5.它的键程为 1.5 毫米,提供两级背光。就布局而言,键盘几乎是全尺寸的,大多数按键也是全尺寸的。只有右侧的几个按键略微缩小。
在这种情况下,使用 Chicony 制造的键盘是一种非常不错的体验,输入长文本是一种享受。虽然它给人的感觉可能不如诸如 ThinkPad X1 Carbon一样精致,但它仍能提供 90% 的使用体验,毫无疑问是经济型笔记本电脑中最好的键盘之一。
触摸板和 TrackPoint
显示屏仍是经济型 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑的致命弱点
联想为 ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 AMD 提供了三种不同的 14 英寸 16:10 屏幕。它们都基于 IPS 技术,屏幕表面为哑光。
- WUXGA (1,920 x 1,200), 300 cd/m², 45 % NTSC
- WUXGA (1,920 x 1,200), 300 cd/m², 45 % NTSC, on-cell multitouch
- 2.2K(2,240 x 1,400),300 cd/m²,100 % sRGB
这款显示器是经济型笔记本电脑使用的典型低端面板。虽然它的屏幕平均亮度为 343 cd/m²,超过了联想的预期,但总体而言,它仍然是一款廉价面板。
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 346 cd/m²
Contrast: 1081:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89, calibrated: 5.8
ΔE Greyscale 9.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
39.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE MNE007QS3-2, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 M140NWHE R1, IPS, 2240x1400, 14", 60 Hz | Acer Swift Go 14 AI MNE507QS2-2 CSOT T9, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.5", 120 Hz | Dell Latitude 3440 BOE NE140FH, IPS, 1920x1080, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 AU Optronics B140UAN03.2, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 76% | 82% | 6% | 8% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 38.4 | 69.3 80% | 71.2 85% | 40.4 5% | 41.3 8% |
sRGB Coverage | 56.7 | 97.6 72% | 99 75% | 60.7 7% | 61.8 9% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 39.7 | 70.4 77% | 73.3 85% | 41.8 5% | 42.7 8% |
Response Times | -39% | -24% | -70% | -22% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 24.1 ? | 36.3 ? -51% | 32 ? -33% | 35.3 ? -46% | 28.8 ? -20% |
Response Time Black / White * | 15.4 ? | 19.5 ? -27% | 17.5 ? -14% | 29.8 ? -94% | 19.1 ? -24% |
PWM Frequency | |||||
Screen | 49% | 31% | 27% | 30% | |
Brightness middle | 346 | 362 5% | 357.5 3% | 292.6 -15% | 369.9 7% |
Brightness | 343 | 354 3% | 341 -1% | 270 -21% | 361 5% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 91 0% | 93 2% | 88 -3% | 93 2% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.18 44% | 0.3 6% | 0.19 41% | 0.24 25% |
Contrast | 1081 | 2011 86% | 1192 10% | 1540 42% | 1541 43% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 8.8 | 2.6 70% | 3.27 63% | 4.63 47% | 5.2 41% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 23.1 | 3.7 84% | 6.83 70% | 17.1 26% | 18.41 20% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 5.8 | 1.1 81% | 0.95 84% | 2.13 63% | 2.04 65% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9.2 | 3.3 64% | 5.14 44% | 3.2 65% | 3.5 62% |
Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.28 96% | 2.44 90% | 2.34 94% | 2.06 107% |
CCT | 5979 109% | 6761 96% | 6026 108% | 7184 90% | 6204 105% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 29% /
42% | 30% /
34% | -12% /
9% | 5% /
18% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
15.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.9 ms rise | |
↘ 8.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
24.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.3 ms rise | |
↘ 12.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8619 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能与老款 E 系列 ThinkPad 相比,更好的图形处理器是其主要优势所在
联想总共提供了五种不同的 AMD Ryzen 7035 CPU。与众不同的是,联想 ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 AMD 包括一个低端选项,即 AMD Ryzen 3 7335U - 通常,ThinkPad 会跳过 Ryzen 3 或 i3/Core 3 CPU 选项。其他 CPU 选项包括 AMD Ryzen 5 7535U和 Ryzen 7 735U和 Ryzen 5 7535HS和 Ryzen 7735HS.根据所选处理器 AMD Radeon 660M或 Radeon 680M作为 GPU - 没有 dGPU 选项。
联想采用模块化内存,联想ThinkPad E14 G6最多包含两个SO-DIMM模块,最大容量为64 GB DDR5-4800。它还最多可容纳两个存储驱动器,一个是 M.2 2242,一个是 M.2 2280 SSD,总容量可达 2 TB。
测试条件
联想 ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 AMD 有三种电源模式可供选择。这三种模式都可以通过 Windows 设置进行设置。电源模式通过功率限制影响 CPU 功耗,进而影响性能。功耗限制 1 是持续负载下的功耗,而 PL2 是短时间任务的最大功耗。
- 最佳电池寿命:PL1 10 W / PL2 30 W
- 平衡:PL1 20 瓦 / PL2 30 瓦
- 最佳性能:PL1 30 瓦 / PL2 35 瓦
我们的所有基准测试都是在激活 "最佳性能 "配置文件的情况下进行的。
处理器
餈 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS是一款基于 AMD Zen 3+ 代的处理器,代号为 "伦勃朗",最早于 2022 年作为 Ryzen 6000 推出。因此,Ryzen 7035 CPU 被称为 "Rembrandt R "或 Rembrandt refresh。虽然联想使用如此老旧的 CPU 似乎不太好,但这仍然是一种进步,因为 E 系列之前一直使用基于 Ryzen 5000 的芯片。Ryzen 7735HS 有 8 个内核,时钟频率从 3.2 GHz 到 4.75 GHz 不等。由于采用了 SMT 技术,总共有 16 个线程,作为 HS CPU,典型 TDP 值为 35 W。 CPU 列表.
遗憾的是,联想 ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 AMD 的性能令人失望。尽管采用了更新的 CPU 架构,而且与前代 U 系列 CPU 相比,HS CPU 的 TDP 值更高,但 E14 G6 的性能实际上比 E14 G5.虽然新款 CPU 的整体性能评级略高,但这主要是由于单核性能更好。在多核基准测试中,E14 G6 比前一代系统稍慢,但至少仍能击败 ThinkPad E14 6 代英特尔.性能不错,但仍落后于较新的 Zen 4 和 Zen 5 CPU。
在电池模式下,我们没有发现任何节流现象。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Average of class Office | |
Dell Latitude 3440 -2! | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (10283 - 14131, n=14) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Average of class Office (1577 - 15743, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
Dell Latitude 3440 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Average of class Office (618 - 1995, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (1288 - 1570, n=14) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (3968 - 5502, n=14) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Average of class Office (590 - 5980, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
Dell Latitude 3440 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Average of class Office (229 - 766, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (502 - 613, n=14) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (1758 - 2355, n=16) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Average of class Office (246 - 2642, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
Dell Latitude 3440 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (206 - 255, n=15) | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Average of class Office (208 - 1956, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (214 - 351, n=14) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (43455 - 63698, n=14) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Average of class Office (7532 - 65460, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (4779 - 5849, n=14) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Average of class Office (2972 - 6687, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (7854 - 11035, n=8) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Average of class Office (662 - 14767, n=75, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Average of class Office (457 - 2812, n=74, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (2058 - 2153, n=8) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (7368 - 10258, n=14) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Average of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Average of class Office (510 - 1995, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (1327 - 1615, n=14) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (10.8 - 17.9, n=14) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Average of class Office (1.72 - 18.7, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (44.3 - 63.9, n=14) | |
Average of class Office (31.3 - 129.6, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.135, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (0.4822 - 0.585, n=14) | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Average of class Office | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (11831 - 17161, n=15) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Average of class Office (763 - 24250, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (75370 - 105483, n=15) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Average of class Office (4113 - 102371, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (2499 - 3494, n=15) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Average of class Office (287 - 4551, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 3440 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (87486 - 108729, n=15) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (11233 - 13097, n=15) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Average of class Office (404 - 14288, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (41400 - 58232, n=15) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Average of class Office (2075 - 54846, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (44013 - 137629, n=15) | |
Average of class Office (7254 - 155900, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Dell Latitude 3440 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (651 - 906, n=15) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Average of class Office (78 - 1018, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (1459 - 9094, n=15) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Average of class Office (432 - 12869, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
Average of class Office (4814 - 54971, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (19153 - 30542, n=15) | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 |
系统性能
系统性能良好。在这方面,ThinkPad E14 G6 领先于 E14 G5,尽管英特尔机型在基准测试中略胜一筹。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M (5722 - 7000, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Average of class Office (2463 - 7344, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 3440 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M (9795 - 11124, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M (8428 - 9862, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 3440 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M (5798 - 8726, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Average of class Office (2049 - 9773, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M (1387 - 1736, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M (1443 - 1725, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M (1376 - 1785, n=7) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
Average of class Office (340 - 1982, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M (1218 - 1653, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M (272 - 307, n=6) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Average of class Office (121 - 455, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M (220 - 231, n=7) | |
Average of class Office (80 - 328, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
Average of class Office (399 - 1966, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M (580 - 632, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6234 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (30324 - 52012, n=15) | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Average of class Office (7325 - 127282, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (33938 - 51856, n=15) | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (33175 - 55284, n=15) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Average of class Office (7.6 - 185.2, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (78.2 - 109.8, n=15) | |
Dell Latitude 3440 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
体积小,但速度不快:三星制造的 M.2 2242 SSD 容量为 1 TB。这是一款 NVMe PCIe 4.0 硬盘,在我们对比的 14 英寸笔记本电脑中性能最差。此外,该固态硬盘在负载情况下会出现节流。别搞错了:用户不会因为固态硬盘而感到系统运行缓慢,它只是与其他固态硬盘相比速度相对较慢,但并不是绝对的。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
Zen 3+/Ryzen 6000 架构的主要优势之一是更好的 GPU,因为它将过时的 Vega 图形处理器换成了 AMD Radeon 680M.在 3DMark 基准测试中,E14 G6 比 E14 G5 快 86%。在游戏方面,虽然差距较小,但仍然很可观,提高了 59%。没有错:ThinkPad E14 6 代 AMD 仍然不是一款出色的游戏系统,但至少在低图形设置下,它足以胜任许多现代游戏。它也比 联想 ThinkPad E14 6 代 Intel高出一大截。
3DMark 11 Performance | 10043 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6161 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2464 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Average of class Office | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 -2! | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI -1! | |
Dell Latitude 3440 -2! |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Average of class Office (6.65 - 26.4, n=28, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Average of class Office (7.96 - 28.9, n=24, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
Average of class Office (3.98 - 47.8, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Average of class Office (4.18 - 35.7, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 3440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Average of class Office (13.4 - 121.2, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go 14 AI | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE | |
Average of class Office (8.88 - 92.6, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 | |
Dell Latitude 3440 |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 132 | 120.2 | 45.2 | 20.3 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 122.9 | 97.4 | 70.7 | 62.6 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 54.8 | 29.7 | 20.8 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 58.3 | 45 | 38.3 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 60 | 34 | 31 | 29 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 31.8 | 23.5 | 20.2 | 19.7 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 29.4 | 23.3 | 18.4 | 15.6 |
F1 24 (2024) | 57.1 | 51.4 | 38 | 8.42 |
废气排放ThinkPad E14 基本保持安静
系统噪音
在空转时,联想 ThinkPad E14 6 代 AMD 可以关闭风扇。即使在平均负载下,我们也几乎听不到风扇的声音,因为它几乎是静音的,只有 24.5 分贝(a)。奇怪的是,只有在使用《赛博朋克 2077》进行测试时,笔记本电脑的最大噪音才达到 37.6 dB(a),而在压力测试和最大负载下,最高噪音为 34.5 dB(a)。这意味着,E14 G6 AMD 的噪音大大低于 E14 5 代 AMD或 E14 6 代英特尔.
我们检测不到任何线圈啸叫,但有电子嗡嗡声。只有将耳朵贴在键盘上时才能听到。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.5 / 23.5 / 23.5 dB(A) |
Load |
| 24.5 / 34.5 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE Radeon 680M, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 Vega 8, R7 7730U, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | Acer Swift Go 14 AI Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Micron 2550 MTFDKBA512TGE | Dell Latitude 3440 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1345U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 155U, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL8512HDLU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -12% | 3% | -14% | -9% | |
off / environment * | 23.5 | 24.4 -4% | 23 2% | 23.9 -2% | 24.6 -5% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.5 | 24.4 -4% | 23 2% | 24.4 -4% | 24.6 -5% |
Idle Average * | 23.5 | 24.4 -4% | 23 2% | 24.4 -4% | 24.6 -5% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.5 | 25.7 -9% | 23 2% | 24.4 -4% | 24.6 -5% |
Load Average * | 24.5 | 31.8 -30% | 37.1 -51% | 27.5 -12% | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 37.6 | 28.13 25% | 39.4 -5% | ||
Load Maximum * | 34.5 | 41.2 -19% | 39.14 -13% | 40.2 -17% | 42.5 -23% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 36.7 | 38.2 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.1 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the class Office.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.1 °C / 86.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-2.5 °C / -4.5 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G4 21EB0041GE AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Acer Swift Go 14 AI Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Dell Latitude 3440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 11% | 16% | 11% | 23% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 43.4 | 38.8 11% | 39 10% | 35.2 19% | 35 19% |
Maximum Bottom * | 47.1 | 44.5 6% | 45 4% | 41 13% | 35.6 24% |
Idle Upper Side * | 31.5 | 28.1 11% | 24 24% | 29.8 5% | 23.8 24% |
Idle Bottom * | 33.7 | 29 14% | 25 26% | 32 5% | 24.8 26% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
联想 ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 的向下发射扬声器是典型的经济型笔记本电脑。虽然总音量还可以,但低音不足,整体音质一般。
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Acer Swift Go 14 AI audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理:较高的功耗会影响联想笔记本电脑的电池寿命
耗电量
遗憾的是,新款联想 ThinkPad E14 G6 AMD 的运行效率低于旧款 ThinkPad E14 5 代 AMD尤其是在空转时。与 E14 G6 Intel在功耗方面打成平手。
59.7 W 的最大功耗远低于 65 W 充电器的最大容量。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 R7 7730U, Vega 8, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00, IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | Acer Swift Go 14 AI SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, Micron 2550 MTFDKBA512TGE, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.5" | Dell Latitude 3440 i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL8512HDLU, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Average AMD Radeon 680M | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 12% | 28% | 9% | -7% | -13% | 10% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.9 | 3.3 44% | 3.7 37% | 3.7 37% | 5.4 8% | 6.76 ? -15% | 4.48 ? 24% |
Idle Average * | 8.8 | 7.6 14% | 6.5 26% | 6.5 26% | 9.7 -10% | 8.87 ? -1% | 7.46 ? 15% |
Idle Maximum * | 11.8 | 8.9 25% | 7.8 34% | 9.5 19% | 10.4 12% | 10.5 ? 11% | 8.96 ? 24% |
Load Average * | 37.8 | 47.3 -25% | 46.9 -24% | 49.2 -30% | 53.2 ? -41% | 41.7 ? -10% | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 42.6 | 28.5 33% | 47.1 -11% | ||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 49.3 | 25.4 48% | 50.1 -2% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 59.7 | 57.8 3% | 67.04 -12% | 67 -12% | 68.9 -15% | 70.1 ? -17% | 61.7 ? -3% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 45.1 | 42.1 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G5-21JSS05C00 R7 7730U, Vega 8, 57 Wh | Acer Swift Go 14 AI SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, 75 Wh | Dell Latitude 3440 i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 54 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G6 Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core, 47 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 10% | 119% | -4% | 20% | 47% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 552 | 594 8% | 1313 138% | 528 -4% | 566 3% | 631 ? 14% |
Load | 64 | 71 11% | 128 100% | 87 36% | 114.4 ? 79% |
笔记本检查评级
联想 ThinkPad E14 6 代 AMD 是一款经济实惠的工作笔记本电脑。尽管屏幕质量还有待提高,但凭借其升级潜力,它可以成为一款出色的个人笔记本电脑。
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 6 21M3002KGE
- 02/16/2025 v8
Benjamin Herzig
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.