联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 13 代灵光版笔记本电脑评测:X1 Carbon 终于回来了
超轻商务战士
英特尔 Lunar Lake 处理器与 X1 Carbon 似乎是天作之合。多年来,由于英特尔 CPU 效率低下,这款旗舰 ThinkPad 一直饱受发热和续航问题的困扰。联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 13 代灵光版终于解决了这些问题。Benjamin Herzig, 👁 Benjamin Herzig (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇫🇷 ...
结论月湖光帮助联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 再次绽放光芒
X1 Carbon 最初于 2012 年推出时,是为最初几代超极本的 15 W CPU 而设计的。这些年来,X1 Carbon 变得越来越轻薄,但英特尔的 CPU 最近却越来越耗电,与这款超薄商务笔记本不匹配。有了 Lunar Lake,英特尔终于推出了适合 X1 Carbon 系列的 CPU。联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 13 代灵光版是该系列迄今为止最好的版本。
新版 X1 Carbon G13 继承了去年 X1 Carbon Gen 12 的优点,并在此基础上进一步改进,因为它的重量减轻了。更重要的是,它几乎消除了所有关键的弱点,因为这款新的 X1 Carbon G13 运行起来更加凉爽,最重要的是,它的运行时间更长,因为我们看到它的电池寿命提高了 30%。最后,即使采用 OLED 屏幕,电池续航时间也相当不错。唯一的遗憾是网络摄像头的分辨率较低。此外,与前代机型不同,X1 Carbon 没有 64 GB 的选项,但这是 Lunar Lake 的限制。
总的来说,X1 Carbon Gen 13 是这款高端商务笔记本电脑亟需的回归--我们已经迫不及待地想看到它推出全系列选项,如 5G、更省电的 IPS 屏幕和更实惠的 CPU 选择。目前,X1 Carbon Gen 13 的售价很高,因此我们欢迎更多的入门级产品来降低它的售价。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
目前,X1 Carbon Gen 13 Aura Edition 在联想网站有售,售价约为 2519 美元。需要注意的是,美国版的 X1 Carbon Gen 13 Aura Edition 目前采用的是经典的机械触摸板设计,还配备了 TrackPoint 专用按键,而不是我们测试的触觉感应触摸板。
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,186.00 Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Ge... 2. $1,400.77 Lenovo Gen 12 ThinkPad X1 Ca... 3. $1,425.00 Lenovo Gen 12 ThinkPad X1 Ca... List Price: 2700 Euro | 982 g | 16 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,449.00 List Price: 2700 USD | 1.1 kg | 14.96 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $949.00 Dell XPS 13-9350 13.3-Inch H... 2. $1,269.99 Dell XPS 13 Home & Business ... 3. $31.54 DMKAOLLK XPS 13 9350 9343 JD... List Price: 1400 USD | 1.2 kg | 15.3 mm | 13.40" 1920x1200 169 PPI IPS | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU Apple M3 ⎘ Apple M3 10-Core GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,299.00 List Price: 1759€ | 1.2 kg | 11.3 mm | 13.60" 2560x1664 225 PPI IPS | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $997.29 List Price: 1700 USD | 1.3 kg | 11.2 mm | 14.00" 2240x1400 189 PPI IPS | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $839.49 ASUS Zenbook 14 OLED 2024 Bu... 2. $849.99 ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED Lapt... 3. $1,636.00 ASUS Zenbook Duo Laptop, Dua... List Price: 1999€ | 1.2 kg | 13 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
如果要从众多联想 ThinkPad 中挑选一款,那毫无疑问就是 X1 Carbon。它是最负盛名的 ThinkPad,专为大公司的首席执行官和其他高管设计,极为轻薄。毫无疑问,它也是价格最高的 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑之一。
遗憾的是,ThinkPad X1 系列最近几年的表现并不理想。主要原因是联想与英特尔在这些机型上有着密切的合作关系,但英特尔最近一直在努力生产适合这种轻薄设计的 CPU。大多数英特尔 CPU 都需要强大的散热系统,而 X1 系列本身并不具备这种条件。因此,像 X1 Carbon 11 代等机型运行时温度很高,而且续航时间很短。
随着全新联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 Aura Edition 的推出,这种令人遗憾的局面终于结束了。我们今天测试的新机型采用了英特尔 Lunar Lake 处理器,这是英特尔多年来首次针对 X1 Carbon 等超极本系统进行适当优化的 CPU 系列。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格Aura 版包括 Core Ultra 7 和 OLED
案例:X1 Carbon Gen 13 重新定义了 ThinkPad 的轻便性
三年前,联想推出了 ThinkPad X1 系列的新机型--ThinkPad X1 Nano。 联想 ThinkPad X1 Nano.该机型是当时最小、最轻的 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑,起始重量仅为 909 克或 1.99 磅。
虽然 X1 Nano 已不复存在,但联想显然仍希望客户需要一台重量不足一公斤的笔记本电脑。联想新推出的 ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 在测试配置中仅重 982 克/2.16 磅。它是有史以来最轻的 X1 Carbon,也是配备 14 英寸屏幕的最轻 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑。拿着它的感觉就像几乎没拿过笔记本电脑,比以前的机型明显要轻。与ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 12 的 1.09 千克或 2.4 磅相比,它的重量整整减轻了 10%。
联想将底板所用的铝换成了镁,同时在屏幕盖上坚持使用碳纤维,从而减轻了重量。尽管 X1 Carbon 的结构更加轻巧,但手感却一如既往地扎实。只有镁合金底盖在单点按压时有轻微弯曲,但这应该不会影响设备的长期耐用性。
神奇的是,尽管重量减轻了,X1 Carbon 仍然能完成 "单指打开屏幕 "的动作。黑色铰链没有任何晃动,最大开启角度略大于 180 度。
除了重量更轻外,X1 Carbon Gen 13 Aura Edition 基本上采用了与 X1 Carbon Gen 12 相同的设计。 X1 Carbon Gen 12.这包括更小的屏幕边框、熏黑的铰链和徽标,以及顶部突出的摄像头凸起。这种设计为数不多的缺点之一就是黑色表面很容易弄脏,所以经常擦拭应该是这款机型的习惯。
连接性X1 Carbon 为轻薄型产品提供了很多功能
端口选择与 X1 Carbon 12 代一样。我们希望联想能将右侧的 USB-A 换成另一个 USB-C,这样设备就可以从两侧充电了,但除此之外,对于这样一款移动笔记本电脑来说,这样的端口选择还是很不错的。与 Apple MacBook Air相比 XPS 13或 惠普 EliteBook Ultra但联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G13 的两个 USB-A 接口和全尺寸 HDMI 接口显然更胜一筹。
交流
这款顶级商务设备提供最新、最先进的英特尔 Wi-Fi 解决方案,即英特尔 BE201,它自然支持 Wi-Fi 7。在我们的测试中,传输速度非常出色,不过上传数据比下载稍慢。
联想ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13目前还没有WWAN版本。由于前代产品确实提供了 5G LTE,我们预计联想最终也会为这款设备推出这样的选项。
网络摄像头
联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 Aura Edition 的摄像头非常显眼。这并不是因为摄像头凸起,而是因为 ThinkPad 仅提供 1080p 分辨率--许多其他较低端的 ThinkPad 机型已经配备了 500 万像素网络摄像头,因此联想为这款高端机型做出这样的决定很奇怪。网络摄像头的质量低于标准,只能勉强满足视频通话的需要。
安全
尽管 X1 Carbon 比大多数 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑都要薄,但它仍然提供了企业级产品的大多数安全功能。在内部,包括专用的 TPM 芯片和底部防篡改检测功能,一旦底盖在未经授权的情况下被打开,就会锁定机器。在外部,ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 有一个 Kensington 锁插槽、一个指纹传感器和用于 Windows Hello 的红外网络摄像头。与更大的 ThinkPad 不同的是,X1 没有配备智能卡读卡器,但这也是唯一的损失。
配件
包装盒内只有带 USB-C 插头的 65 瓦 GaN 充电器。没有其他配件,其他一切如 Thunderbolt 底座或以太网适配器都需要额外付费购买。
维护
打开 X1 Carbon Gen 13 非常简单:只有四颗螺丝固定着底盖,而且是固定螺丝。这意味着它们不会从底盖中脱落,也就不会丢失。背面有几个卡扣,但也很容易松开。
值得注意的是,新款 X1 Carbon 的电池外壳现在是灰色的,这意味着电池现在被归类为 CRU。如果用户觉得可以的话,可以自行更换。除此之外,X1 Carbon Gen 13 与前代产品一样可以升级--或者说在这种情况下,不能升级。除了 M.2 2280 固态硬盘外,没有任何可升级部件。Wi-Fi 卡是焊接的,内存是 CPU 套件的一部分,所有英特尔 Lunar Lake 笔记本电脑都是如此。当然,风扇可以轻松更换或清洁,这至少是件好事。与 ThinkPad T14 5 代由于键盘是掌托的一部分,因此不容易更换。
可持续性
X1 Carbon G13 是一款全新产品,联想尚未披露其对二氧化碳的影响。在其他方面,联想自豪地宣传这款高端商务笔记本电脑的可持续发展特性,它采用 100% 可堆肥包装。笔记本电脑的底座也是由 90% 的可回收镁制成。由于是 ThinkPad,联想提供多年的更换部件和软件更新,因为这些笔记本电脑在大公司的使用期长达五年。此外,还提供维修手册和视频指南。
保修
由于在德国销售,联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 Aura Edition 包括三年保修。该套餐的一部分是联想的卓越支持与现场服务,这意味着如果可能的话,笔记本电脑将在客户家中由技术人员进行维修。保修期可以选择升级到五年,意外损坏保护(ADP)也是如此,它可以防止跌落和泼溅。
由于这是一款企业笔记本电脑,会随首席执行官们在全球各地旅行,因此保修期是全球性的,不过在德国以外的地区,保修期只包括基本的带入服务。
输入设备:触觉 Sensel 触摸板与 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 相结合
键盘
键盘与联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 12 基本相同。唯一真正的变化是,由于 X1 Carbon Gen 13 是 Copilot+ 机型,因此现在自然包括一个 Copilot 键。为了腾出空间,右侧的 Ctrl 键被砍掉了。
除此之外,键盘完全相同。背光键的键程(两级)为 1.5 毫米,比旧款 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑要小,但仍比许多其他超极本级别的笔记本电脑要大。在键盘上打字是一种享受,因为它在坚硬和柔软的感觉之间取得了很好的平衡,这也是 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑的典型特点。键盘布局合理,按键间距适中。尤其值得称赞的是,键盘上有分组的 F 键和比大多数小型笔记本电脑更大的方向键。
触摸板和 TrackPoint
联想继续为 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 提供两种不同的触摸板选择:一种是为红色 TrackPoint 指点杆配备专用鼠标按钮的经典选项,另一种是为 TrackPoint 配备集成点击区的新型触觉 Sensel 触摸板。我们的设备包括触觉选项,它是一个出色的解决方案。它采用了大面积的哑光玻璃表面,感觉高档而宽敞。点击是触觉式的,因此你可以点击任何地方,还可以设置触觉响应的强度。触觉点击的感觉很精确,执行力也不高。毫无疑问,这是市场上最好的触摸板之一。
此外,TrackPoint 还可用于移动鼠标指针,只需对红色橡胶帽施加压力即可。使用 TrackPoint 时,触摸板的上半部分可用于执行右键、左键或中键点击,用于滚动的中键由七个凸起的圆点表示,左键/右键点击区由两条浅灰色条纹表示。使用 TrackPoint 而不是触摸板肯定是个人偏好,但如果你经常打字,使用 TrackPoint 还是很有意义的,因为它嵌在键盘中间,使用时双手不必离开键盘。在火车或飞机等距离较近的地方也更有用,因为在这些地方你可能没有太多的空间来操作触摸板。
集成按钮与 TrackPoint 配合得很好,联想在取代专用点击器方面做得很好。当然,对于 TrackPoint 用户来说,有这些按键会更好,但对于触摸板用户来说,更大的触摸板无疑也是有益的,因此我们可以理解联想做出这一选择的原因。
显示屏快速 OLED 屏幕,色域宽广,但 PWM
目前,联想只为联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 提供了单一的屏幕选择,不过我们已经知道,2025 年将会有更多的屏幕选择(全部基于 IPS)。目前提供的是最高档的选择,14 英寸 16:10 OLED 面板,分辨率为 2,880 x 1,800(2.8K)。据联想称,该屏幕的亮度可达 400 cd/m²,覆盖 100% 的 DCI P3 色域。此外,该显示屏还支持 120 Hz 的刷新率和 HDR。
平均而言,屏幕亮度约为 410 cd/m²。联想超额完成了自己的承诺,虽然同样的屏幕在去年的 X1 Carbon 12 代略微亮一些。而 MacBook Air 的 IPS 面板亮度更高。 Apple MacBook Air和 戴尔 XPS 13但在对比度和深黑色方面,两者都无法与 OLED 屏幕相比。
在响应时间方面也是如此,OLED 在这方面完全胜过 IPS。值得注意的是,联想宣传显示屏为 120 Hz,但实际上 X1 Carbon 出厂时启用的是 60 Hz,没有动态刷新率。120 Hz 刷新率是可用的,但会导致功耗增加和电池寿命缩短。
|
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 407 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 4.7
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.26
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE ATNA40YK20-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Samsung ATNA40YK20-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Dell XPS 13 9350 LG Philips 134WU2, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4", 120 Hz | Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6", 60 Hz | HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 IPS, 2240x1400, 14", 60 Hz | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 ATNA40CU09-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | -21% | -3% | -3% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 99.5 | 99.7 0% | 67.3 -32% | 98.4 -1% | 99 -1% | |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 99 -1% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 97.1 | 98.2 1% | 68.6 -29% | 87.9 -9% | 89.2 -8% | |
Response Times | 41% | -1359% | -1335% | -846% | 78% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2.4 ? | 0.91 ? 62% | 37.3 ? -1454% | 34.5 ? -1338% | 22.8 ? -850% | 0.7 ? 71% |
Response Time Black / White * | 1.9 ? | 0.76 ? 60% | 25.9 ? -1263% | 27.2 ? -1332% | 17.9 ? -842% | 0.71 ? 63% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 240.3 0% | 480 ? 100% | |||
Screen | 38% | 42% | 33% | -63% | 32% | |
Brightness middle | 407 | 417 2% | 462.8 14% | 525 29% | 341.4 -16% | 374 -8% |
Brightness | 410 | 417 2% | 435 6% | 506 23% | 315 -23% | 379 -8% |
Brightness Distribution | 99 | 98 -1% | 87 -12% | 92 -7% | 87 -12% | 98 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.19 | 0.42 | 0.39 | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 1.26 74% | 1.92 61% | 1.4 71% | 5.63 -15% | 1 80% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.1 | 3.6 60% | 3.45 62% | 2.8 69% | 11.94 -31% | 2.2 76% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.7 | 0.68 86% | 0.48 90% | |||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 1.3 43% | 0.6 74% | 2 13% | 8.8 -283% | 1.1 52% |
Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.27 97% | 2.19 100% | 2.2 100% | 2.14 103% | 2.15 102% |
CCT | 6310 103% | 6355 102% | 6539 99% | 6876 95% | 6034 108% | 6549 99% |
Contrast | 2436 | 1250 | 875 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 26% /
30% | -446% /
-207% | -435% /
-226% | -455% /
-259% | 36% /
35% |
* ... smaller is better
这块屏幕显然不太适合在较小的 sRGB 色彩空间中工作,因为它能更准确地显示较宽的 DCI P3 色域中的色彩。通过校准几乎无法提高色彩准确度。
正如联想所承诺的,OLED 屏幕几乎完全覆盖了 DCI P3,覆盖率达到 99.5%。这使得该面板适用于处理色彩。
由于显示屏的半光泽特性,在明亮的环境中使用时会有一些反光。不过,屏幕的高亮度和近乎无限的对比度有助于保持屏幕的户外使用性。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.9 ms rise | |
↘ 1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.2 ms rise | |
↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz Amplitude: 33 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
OLED 屏幕的典型特点是使用脉宽调制(PWM)来调节屏幕亮度。屏幕以 240 Hz 的频率闪烁。亮度超过 50%,它就会以相同的频率切换到直流调光,这对那些难以忍受 PWM 闪烁的用户来说问题应该不大。
性能Lunar Lake 提供出色的日常性能
目前,联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 的硬件选择范围实在有限。目前只有一款 CPU 英特尔酷睿至尊 7 258V该处理器配备了英特尔 ARC 140V iGPU 和 32 GB LPDDR5X-8533 标配内存。用户只能在固态硬盘方面进行选择,联想提供 512 GB、1 TB 或 2 TB 的固态硬盘存储空间,可以是 NVMe PCIe Gen 4 或 NVMe PCIe Gen 5。其他选项,如酷睿 Ultra 5 CPU 和 16 GB 内存,将于明年推出。
测试条件
联想提供三种不同的电源模式,可以通过联想商用贵族应用或 Windows 设置进行选择。F8 键上还有一个 "模式 "功能,可用于访问快速设置界面。
三种模式通过设置功率限制 (PL) 影响 CPU 功耗,从而影响性能。PL1 是持续负载时的功耗,PL2 是短时间内的功耗。
- 最佳电池寿命:PL1 10.5 W / PL2 37 W
- 平衡:PL1 12 瓦 / PL2 37 瓦
- 最佳性能:PL1 20 瓦 / PL2 37 瓦
一如既往,性能测试在 "最佳性能 "模式下进行。
处理器
英特尔 英特尔酷睿至强 7 258V是英特尔 Lunar Lake 系列的八核 CPU。四颗大的 Lion Cove P 内核的最高时钟频率为 4.8 GHz,四颗小的 Skymont E 内核的最高时钟频率为 3.7 GHz。所有内核都不提供超线程功能,因此总共只有 8 个线程。要与许多新旧 CPU 进行全面比较,建议使用我们的 CPU 比较列表。
Lunar Lake 优化后功耗更低,因此 X1 Carbon Gen 13 没有击败 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 12 代在多核性能方面,我们测试过搭载流星湖 H28 处理器的旧机型,即 酷睿至尊 7 155H处理器,它拥有 16 个线程而不是 8 个线程。多核性能更符合 U 系列芯片。持续性能与 X1 Carbon Gen 11及其 U 系列 Raptor Lake CPU 相似。AMD Ryzen AI 和 Snapdragon X Elite 在这方面更具优势。
单核性能则不同。如果只使用一个核心,联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 13 代灵气版的性能名列榜首。在 Cinebench 渲染基准测试中,它比 X1 Carbon Gen 12 快 10%到 16%。
在没有连接交流适配器的情况下,CPU 运行速度会稍慢。性能大约降低了 8%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU -9! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 -2! | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=64, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (9114 - 11097, n=5) | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (1664 - 1918, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=64, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=60, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (3530 - 4284, n=5) | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (643 - 734, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=60, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (1550 - 1656, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (258 - 294, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=64, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (320 - 414, n=5) | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=57, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (32198 - 36422, n=5) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (5547 - 5865, n=5) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2244 - 15220, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (10730 - 11102, n=5) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (2673 - 2757, n=5) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (960 - 3130, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (9330 - 9750, n=5) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (1956 - 2046, n=5) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (10.5 - 14.2, n=5) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (44.9 - 59.3, n=5) | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (0.4457 - 0.4631, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1141 - 32888, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (9215 - 12781, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6838 - 123315, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (48758 - 63401, n=5) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (2271 - 2817, n=5) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11579 - 115682, n=59, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (49763 - 49818, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (4103 - 4426, n=5) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (3366 - 65433, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (25361 - 33565, n=5) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (38049 - 40753, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (166.9 - 1379, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (499 - 632, n=5) | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (4891 - 6930, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (51458 - 54971, n=5) | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 54881, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
系统性能
对于日常性能而言,高单核 CPU 性能非常有益。联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 Aura Edition 正是如此,因此在系统性能基准测试中取得优异成绩也就不足为奇了。
随着 Lunar Lake 的推出,英特尔首次在 x86 平台上引入了内置内存。这一举措显然收到了成效,因为 X1 Carbon Gen 13 在内存基准测试中明显优于 X1 Carbon Gen 12。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (6265 - 7066, n=5) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=51, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=51, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9295 - 10538, n=5) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=51, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (7357 - 9287, n=5) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9728 - 10008, n=5) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=51, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1623 - 1737, n=5) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=57, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1558 - 1670, n=5) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=57, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1846 - 1971, n=5) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=57, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1251 - 1338, n=5) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 448, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (260 - 303, n=4) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (251 - 287, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 325, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1104, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (468 - 559, n=5) | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7066 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (108474 - 108783, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (14916 - 108756, n=59, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (82846 - 89204, n=5) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=59, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (112837 - 117935, n=5) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (16513 - 117898, n=59, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.2 - 187.8, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (95.2 - 101.1, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 在实时音频/视频方面似乎存在一些问题,主要是由于 GPU 驱动程序造成的中断。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Notebookcheck 的首秀:这是我们第一次测试配备 NVMe PCIe 5.0 固态硬盘的笔记本电脑。SK Hynix 硬盘的容量为 1 TB,是一款 M.2 2280 硬盘。它在我们的存储基准测试中名列前茅。遗憾的是,尽管联想为它配备了专用的铜质隔热罩,但该固态硬盘在持续负载下仍无法保持出色的性能,必须对其进行一定程度的节流。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
英特尔 ARC 140V 是英特尔最新、最强大的集成 GPU。它使 X1 Carbon Gen 13 Aura Edition 成为目前在 GPU 性能方面最强大的 X1 Carbon,因为采用英特尔 "Battlemage "Xe2 架构的 GPU 超越了之前的英特尔 ARC GPU。 英特尔 ARC GPU在 3DMark 测试中平均领先 11%。在游戏方面,差距更大,较新的 Xe2 GPU 比老的 Xe 芯片高出约 17%。AMD 的 Ryzen AI 7 Pro 360在 联想 ThinkPad T14s 6 代AMD 也落后于英特尔的解决方案。英特尔 ARC 140V 比 AMD Radeon 880M 处理器快约 25%。 AMD Radeon 880M.
具备游戏功能的 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 当然不再是梦想。X1 Carbon 13 代的性能足以在全高清分辨率下玩很多游戏,至少要把细节级别设置为中等。
3DMark 11 Performance | 11614 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8893 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4322 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (10.3 - 31.4, n=33, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Dell XPS 13 9350 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 149.3 | 143.9 | 62 | 24.6 | 17.6 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 97.5 | 58 | 78.6 | 65.6 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 84.8 | 47.9 | 34 | 25.5 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 42.4 | 37.4 | 31.3 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 83 | 52 | 48 | 43 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 38.2 | 31.5 | 28.4 | 28 | 19.1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 45.4 | 36.2 | 29.7 | 26.2 | 16.6 |
F1 24 (2024) | 71.4 | 68.7 | 54 | 19.2 |
排放:X1 Carbon G13 的运行温度低于前代产品
系统噪音
近年来,由于英特尔 CPU 的高功耗,如何保持 X1 Carbon 的凉爽和安静一直是一大挑战。在 X1 Carbon Gen 13 上,联想对处理器使用了令人惊讶的高功率限制,最高可达 37 W,这导致负载情况下的最大风扇噪音相当高。在电源配置文件 "最佳性能 "下,运行《赛博朋克 2077》时,两个小风扇的噪音高达 40.5 dB(a) 或 43 dB(a)。噪音略高,但并不刺耳。ThinkPad X1 笔记本电脑在空载运行时非常安静。在中等负载、电源配置文件为 "平衡 "的情况下,我们测得的噪音为 29.9 dB(a)。因此,总的来说,我们建议在 "平衡 "模式下使用笔记本电脑,以保持较低的噪音水平。
在这款 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑上,我们没有听到任何线圈啸叫。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.2 / 23.2 / 23.2 dB(A) |
Load |
| 29.9 / 40.5 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.2 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, SK hynix PCB01 HFS001TFM9X179N GL | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02 | Dell XPS 13 9350 Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V, Micron 2550 512GB | Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z | HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | 0% | 4% | 5% | ||
off / environment * | 23.2 | 23.8 -3% | 24.1 -4% | 23.4 -1% | 23.7 -2% | |
Idle Minimum * | 23.2 | 24 -3% | 24.4 -5% | 23.4 -1% | 23.7 -2% | |
Idle Average * | 23.2 | 24 -3% | 24.4 -5% | 23.4 -1% | 23.7 -2% | |
Idle Maximum * | 23.2 | 24 -3% | 24.4 -5% | 24.3 -5% | 23.7 -2% | |
Load Average * | 29.9 | 31.5 -5% | 26.2 12% | 25 16% | 30.5 -2% | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 43.3 | 34.2 21% | 31.1 28% | |||
Load Maximum * | 40.5 | 37.8 7% | 45.2 -12% | 34.8 14% | 33.6 17% | |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.8 | 30.6 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
与前几代 X1 Carbon 相比,联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 13 Aura Edition 的运行温度明显更低。最高温度低于 X1 Carbon Gen 12平均温度也是如此(X1 Carbon G12:34.6/34.9 摄氏度;X1 Carbon G13:30.2/30.6 摄氏度)。热量主要集中在笔记本电脑的中部,键盘边框是热点--它的温度并不高,最高温度为 42.1 摄氏度或 108 华氏度。
压力测试中没有节流迹象。CPU 性能在 20 到 25 W 之间徘徊,与其他持续基准测试中可见的波形模式相同。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.6 °C / 79.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+1.7 °C / 3 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Dell XPS 13 9350 Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU | HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -6% | 10% | 7% | -6% | -2% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 42.3 | 44.2 -4% | 34.8 18% | 44.3 -5% | 40.8 4% | 43.7 -3% |
Maximum Bottom * | 40.1 | 41.2 -3% | 37.4 7% | 43.4 -8% | 40.4 -1% | 46.9 -17% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27.3 | 29.4 -8% | 25.4 7% | 22.3 18% | 32.2 -18% | 25.8 5% |
Idle Bottom * | 28.3 | 31.2 -10% | 26.2 7% | 22.1 22% | 31.2 -10% | 26.3 7% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
联想将扬声器隐藏在键盘下方。扬声器仍然向上发射,只是没有明显的扬声器格栅。双扬声器是同类 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑中最好的,甚至超过了 戴尔 XPS 13的音量。不过,它们的低音稍差,因此联想在这方面的优势并不明显。
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 13 9350 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理:电池寿命大大提高
耗电量
X1 Carbon Gen 13 的最低功耗实际上略高于X1 Carbon Gen 12 。在所有其他方面,新款机型都更省电。
65 W USB-C 充电器的最大功耗为 60 W,大小适中。
Off / Standby | 0.2 / 0.8 Watt |
Idle | 4.7 / 5.7 / 6.1 Watt |
Load |
29.8 / 60.1 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, SK hynix PCB01 HFS001TFM9X179N GL, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell XPS 13 9350 Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, Micron 2550 512GB, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU M3, M3 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512Z, IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6" | HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF, IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -43% | 11% | -3% | 12% | -6% | -10% | -31% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.7 | 3.9 17% | 1.3 72% | 1.95 59% | 2.5 47% | 5.1 -9% | 3.56 ? 24% | 4.47 ? 5% |
Idle Average * | 5.7 | 5.8 -2% | 2.5 56% | 8.7 -53% | 5.7 -0% | 6.2 -9% | 6.06 ? -6% | 7.6 ? -33% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.1 | 16 -162% | 4.1 33% | 8.9 -46% | 5.8 5% | 6.9 -13% | 7.91 ? -30% | 9.51 ? -56% |
Load Average * | 29.8 | 46.1 -55% | 40.1 -35% | 34.3 -15% | 24.2 19% | 38.7 -30% | 39.8 ? -34% | 46.2 ? -55% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 34.1 | 43.1 -26% | 26.8 21% | 28.6 16% | ||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 35.3 | 46.1 -31% | 33.5 5% | 33.1 6% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 60.1 | 67.4 -12% | 57.3 5% | 35.4 41% | 66.4 -10% | 60 -0% | 62 ? -3% | 68.4 ? -14% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 50.4 | 28.6 | 23.1 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
自 2021 年以来,联想一直保持 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 系列的电池容量不变,内部电池的容量为 57 Wh。Lunar Lake 为这一硬件平台带来的改进是立竿见影的:在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试(150 cd/m²)中,ThinkPad X1 Carbon 13 代 Aura Edition 需要 11 个小时才能达到电池容量的临界值。而在同一测试中,同样采用耗电 OLED 屏幕的前代产品在不到 8 小时后就已关机--大约提高了 30%。
这使得 X1 Carbon Gen 13 成为该系列中首款采用 OLED 屏幕的机型,它的续航能力确实不错,甚至可以通过使用暗光模式进一步提高。我们的 Wi-Fi 脚本大多由亮白色内容组成。在浏览器中强制开启黑暗模式后,OLED 屏幕的耗电量会更低,X1 Carbon 的运行时间也会更长。我们使用暗模式和更快的 120 Hz 刷新率在最大屏幕亮度下对 X1 Carbon 进行了 Wi-Fi 测试,它的运行时间与在较低亮度设置、60 Hz 模式和无暗模式下运行时几乎相同。如果将所有省电方法(较低亮度、60 Hz 刷新率、暗模式)结合起来,运行时间可能会达到 12 小时以上。
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 57 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9350 Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, 55 Wh | Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU M3, M3 10-Core GPU, 52.6 Wh | HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 59 Wh | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 72 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 i7-1370P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -24% | 77% | 69% | 32% | 57% | -24% | 22% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 658 | 466 -29% | 1236 88% | 914 39% | 792 20% | 858 30% | 389 -41% | 726 ? 10% |
Load | 86 | 70 -19% | 142 65% | 171 99% | 124 44% | 157 83% | 80 -7% | 115.1 ? 34% |
笔记本检查评级
联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 Aura Edition 是一款价格昂贵但功能全面的超级移动商务笔记本电脑。除了网络摄像头的质量较低之外,它的质量完全符合人们对这样一款高端设备的预期。由于采用了高效的 Lunar Lake CPU,它的续航时间比以前的版本要长得多,同时运行温度也更低。它是迄今为止最好的 X1 Carbon。
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE
- 12/13/2024 v8
Benjamin Herzig
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.