联想 ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 英特尔可折叠电脑评测:电池续航时间短于 AMD
ThinkPad L13 Yoga Gen 4 有英特尔和 AMD 两个版本,以吸引两方面的用户。本评测页面将重点关注英特尔版本,因为我们最近在 8 月份评测了 AMD 版本。 AMD 版本。.我们对 AMD 版物理特性的所有评论都适用于此,因为这两个版本在外观上完全相同。
我们的英特尔评测机是一款高端配置,配备第 13 代 Raptor Lake-U 酷睿 i7-1355U CPU、16 GB 内存和 1200p IPS 触摸屏,零售价约为 1400 至 600 美元。其他配置从酷睿 i3-1315U 到配备 vPro 的酷睿 i7-1365U,但所有选项都仅限于集成显卡和 1200p 显示屏。
ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 的替代产品包括其他以商务为中心的可转换产品,如 微星 Summit E13 Flip Evo,HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5或戴尔Latitude 7330 2 合 1。
更多联想评论:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.1 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 i7-1355U i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 17.1 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1200 | |
88.7 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 21FSS00100 R5 7530U, Vega 7 | 1.4 kg | 17.1 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1200 | |
90.3 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2022 | HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 17.8 mm | 13.50" | 1920x1280 | |
89 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Dell Latitude 9330 i7-1260U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 14.1 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 | |
86.9 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2021 | MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 14.9 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 | |
87.5 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.3 kg | 15.85 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
与最近推出的 ThinkPad E14 G5 一样,识别英特尔版本和 AMD 版本的最快方法是寻找左侧边缘的 Thunderbolt 徽标,因为 AMD 选项缺少该功能。需要注意的是,虽然该机型配备了两个 USB-C 端口,但只有左侧端口与 eGPU 等 Thunderbolt 设备兼容。
交流
标配的英特尔 AX201 支持 Wi-Fi 6 和蓝牙 5.1,而选配的英特尔 AX211 支持 Wi-Fi 6E。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 i7-1355U | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 21FSS00100 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 21FSS00100 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 i7-1355U | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 21FSS00100 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 21FSS00100 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Dell Latitude 9330 |
网络摄像头
红外摄像头为可选配置,而隐私快门则为标配。低端产品仅配备 720p 网络摄像头,而高端产品则提供 1080p 网络摄像头。
维护
从下面的对比图片可以看出,AMD 和英特尔版本在可升级性方面没有重大的内部差异。
配件和保修
零售包装盒包括交流适配器和活动触控笔。手写笔装在笔记本电脑内,既方便又能充电。
显示屏
我们的英特尔设备配备了与 AMD 设备不同的 1200p IPS 面板(NV133WUM-N61 与 B133UAN01.2)。这种面板的亮度似乎略低 50 至 60 尼特,但黑白和灰度响应时间更快,可最大限度地减少重影。在其他方面,这两款产品的色彩和图像质量非常相似。
令人遗憾的是,考虑到超过 1500 美元的高昂售价,联想没有提供 90 赫兹或 120 赫兹刷新率选项。
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 278.1 cd/m²
Contrast: 818:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.51
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
71.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 i7-1355U NV133WUM-N61, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 21FSS00100 B133UAN01.2 , IPS LED, 1920x1200, 13.3" | HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Chi Mei CMN13C0, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.5" | Dell Latitude 9330 AU Optronics B133QAA, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT Sharp LQ134N1JW53, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U BOE CQ NE135FBM-N41, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 2% | -3% | 6% | -2% | -2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 71.6 | 74.1 3% | 68.3 -5% | 77.8 9% | 69.8 -3% | 69 -4% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.8 | 99.3 -1% | 98.6 -1% | 99.9 0% | 98.8 -1% | 99.1 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.9 | 74.5 4% | 70.2 -2% | 77.5 8% | 70.6 -2% | 71.1 -1% |
Response Times | -58% | -147% | -165% | -140% | -81% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 27.3 ? | 43.3 ? -59% | 66.8 ? -145% | 67.6 ? -148% | 64 ? -134% | 50.4 ? -85% |
Response Time Black / White * | 17.9 ? | 28 ? -56% | 44.4 ? -148% | 50.4 ? -182% | 44 ? -146% | 31.5 ? -76% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | -8% | 22% | 19% | 19% | 24% | |
Brightness middle | 278.1 | 336 21% | 369.5 33% | 542.3 95% | 551.3 98% | 436 57% |
Brightness | 280 | 321 15% | 350 25% | 516 84% | 517 85% | 416 49% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 88 -4% | 87 -5% | 85 -8% | 91 -1% | 89 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.22 35% | 0.24 29% | 0.38 -12% | 0.37 -9% | 0.36 -6% |
Contrast | 818 | 1527 87% | 1540 88% | 1427 74% | 1490 82% | 1211 48% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 2.8 -8% | 2.3 12% | 3.18 -22% | 1.45 44% | 1.81 30% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.81 | 6.9 -43% | 4.34 10% | 6.05 -26% | 2.86 41% | 4.73 2% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.51 | 1.4 -175% | 0.6 -18% | 0.67 -31% | 1.7 -233% | 0.45 12% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.9 | 3.8 3% | 3.1 21% | 3.1 21% | 1.3 67% | 2.9 26% |
Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.15 102% | 2.1 105% | 2.08 106% | 2.14 103% | 2.27 97% |
CCT | 5877 111% | 6664 98% | 6248 104% | 6140 106% | 6580 99% | 6784 96% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 65 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -21% /
-13% | -43% /
-8% | -47% /
-10% | -41% /
-8% | -20% /
3% |
* ... smaller is better
使用 X-Rite 色差计自行校准面板,可将平均灰度和色彩 DeltaE 值分别从 3.9 和 2.6 提高到 0.4 和 0.51。我们的校准 ICM 配置文件可在上面免费下载。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
17.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise | |
↘ 8.9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
27.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.7 ms rise | |
↘ 14.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 设置为 "性能 "模式。除了标准的 Windows 配置文件(节能模式、平衡模式和性能模式)外,没有其他电源配置文件。
处理器
CPU 性能略低于大多数配备相同 酷睿 i7-1355U稍慢。例如,在循环运行 CineBench R15 xT 时,初始分数为 1274 分,随着时间的推移会下降 35%,如下图所示。因此,多线程性能仅比竞争对手的 Ryzen 5 7530U的多线程性能仅略高于竞争对手的 Ryzen 5 7530U。
英特尔的主要优势仍然是单线程性能,我们的酷睿 i7 比 Ryzen 5 7530U 领先 20% 到 25%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 21FSS00100 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (5673 - 8424, n=18) | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 i7-1355U |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 21FSS00100 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (4045 - 5426, n=18) | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 i7-1355U | |
Dell Latitude 9330 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 21FSS00100 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (2991 - 4453, n=18) | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 i7-1355U |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 i7-1355U | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (21800 - 46154, n=18) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 21FSS00100 |
系统性能
在 GPU 能力较强的 "数字内容创建 "子测试中,PCMark 分数较高,而在 CPU 能力较强的 "生产力 "测试中,AMD 版本的分数较高。这表明,我们的英特尔版本提供了更好的集成显卡性能,但 CPU 多线程性能却低于 AMD 版本。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 i7-1355U | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5455 - 5933, n=15) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 21FSS00100 | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 i7-1355U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 21FSS00100 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10203 - 11822, n=15) | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 21FSS00100 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 i7-1355U | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6763 - 7536, n=15) | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 i7-1355U | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5723 - 6712, n=15) | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 21FSS00100 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1478 - 1643, n=15) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 i7-1355U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 21FSS00100 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1444 - 1665, n=15) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 i7-1355U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 21FSS00100 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 i7-1355U | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1563 - 1732, n=15) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 21FSS00100 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1217 - 1681, n=15) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 i7-1355U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 21FSS00100 |
PCMark 10 Score | 5823 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 i7-1355U | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (35910 - 93342, n=18) | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 21FSS00100 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 21FSS00100 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (72.2 - 346, n=18) | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 i7-1355U | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在打开主页的多个浏览器标签页时,LatencyMon 会显示轻微的 DPC 问题。在其他方面,以 60 FPS 播放 4K 视频非常流畅,没有掉帧记录。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 i7-1355U | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 21FSS00100 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的设备配备了中端 512 GB三星 PM9B1而不是 AMD 版本的 Kioxia BG5。传输速率最高约为 3600 MB/s,几分钟的压力后会出现节流,在这种情况下,传输速率可能低至 2200 MB/s。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 -11! | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U -11! | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 21FSS00100 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 i7-1355U |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
我们的 Iris Xe 96 EUs与Radeon RX Vega 7Ryzen 5 7530U 在 DX11 和 DX12 应用程序中的明显优势。例如,3DMarkFire Strike 和Time Spy 的结果显示,我们的英特尔配置要快 50%到 60%。
3DMark 11 Performance | 6398 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 19794 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4178 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1715 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
遗憾的是,游戏时的帧速率稳定性并不稳定。例如,在 Witcher 3 例如,在低设置下,帧速率会在 70 到 85 FPS 之间波动,如下图所示,这表明时钟速率会随着时间的推移而波动。值得庆幸的是,ThinkPad L13 并不是一款游戏笔记本电脑,因此对于目标用户来说,这一特定的缺点并不会影响他们的使用体验。流媒体应用程序在该机型上仍能流畅运行。
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 106.7 | 84.1 | 9.99 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 92.8 | 56.7 | 31 | 13.8 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 94.3 | 65.3 | 52.4 | 46.2 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 36.6 | 20.1 | 15 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 39.8 | 27.3 | 25.1 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 45 | 24 | 22 | 21 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 87.2 | 38.1 | 30.5 | 23 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 17.8 | |||
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 23.3 | 17.7 | 10.9 | 8.6 |
F1 22 (2022) | 45 | 41.1 | 29.8 | 22.6 |
排放量
系统噪音
在运行 3DMark 等要求较高的负载时,英特尔版本的风扇噪音可能会比 AMD 版本的大,这可能是由于英特尔版本的图形性能和整体功耗更快。否则,在浏览网页或流媒体时,风扇噪音通常会徘徊在 30 分贝(A)左右,在大多数办公室或会议环境中很容易被忽略。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.4 / 23.4 / 23.4 dB(A) |
Load |
| 33.9 / 36.9 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.1 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 i7-1355U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZAL4512HBLU | Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 21FSS00100 Vega 7, R5 7530U, Kioxia BG5 KBG5AZNT512G | HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1265U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Dell Latitude 9330 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260U | MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162 | Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 9% | 2% | -4% | -12% | -9% | |
off / environment * | 23.1 | 23.4 -1% | 24.6 -6% | 23 -0% | 24.5 -6% | 22.6 2% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.4 | 23.4 -0% | 24.6 -5% | 23 2% | 24.7 -6% | 22.6 3% |
Idle Average * | 23.4 | 23.4 -0% | 24.6 -5% | 23.1 1% | 24.7 -6% | 22.6 3% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.4 | 23.4 -0% | 24.6 -5% | 23.1 1% | 26.4 -13% | 24.2 -3% |
Load Average * | 33.9 | 24 29% | 27.8 18% | 37.1 -9% | 37.8 -12% | 35.8 -6% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 36.9 | 30.8 17% | 33.4 9% | 40.6 -10% | 41.4 -12% | 46.5 -26% |
Load Maximum * | 36.9 | 30.1 18% | 33.4 9% | 40.5 -10% | 48.8 -32% | 48.9 -33% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
键盘右侧的热点可达 40 摄氏度,这与我们在 AMD 配置上记录到的情况类似。因此,尽管性能不同,但英特尔设备的运行温度并没有明显升高或降低。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23.6 °C / 74.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+4.5 °C / 8.1 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 i7-1355U Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 21FSS00100 AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 Intel Core i7-1265U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Dell Latitude 9330 Intel Core i7-1260U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -3% | 23% | 7% | -14% | 3% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 38.4 | 43.3 -13% | 32.8 15% | 40.6 -6% | 52 -35% | 42 -9% |
Maximum Bottom * | 46 | 46.5 -1% | 33.4 27% | 50.2 -9% | 57.4 -25% | 47.4 -3% |
Idle Upper Side * | 31.2 | 31.9 -2% | 24.6 21% | 25 20% | 30.4 3% | 28.8 8% |
Idle Bottom * | 34.8 | 33.1 5% | 24.6 29% | 27.6 21% | 34.2 2% | 29.6 15% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在启动 Prime95 压力测试时,CPU 会在最初几秒内提升至 3 GHz、89 C 和 35 W,然后稳步下降并稳定在 2.2 GHz、75 C 和 19 W。这种行为与我们在 CineBench R15 xT 上观察到的情况一致,即在测试开始时性能最高,然后逐渐下降。
运行时 GPU 时钟频率 Witcher 3会在 950 至 1150 MHz 之间循环,这也是上述帧频循环的原因。
CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 36 |
Prime95 压力 | 2.2 | -- | 75 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 1.0 - 1.5 | 550 - 850 | 68 - 79 |
Witcher 3 应力 | ~0.6 | 950 - 1150 | 75 |
发言人
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 i7-1355U audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
英特尔配置的功耗全面高于 AMD,尤其是在运行较高负载时。这些差异可能是由于酷睿 i7 CPU 与 Ryzen 5 相比具有更高的初始 Turbo Boost 潜能,以及与 Radeon RX Vega 7 相比具有更快的集成显卡性能。 Witcher 3为例,英特尔设备的耗电量将增加约 30%。
Off / Standby | 0.19 / 0.51 Watt |
Idle | 5.5 / 8.3 / 9.1 Watt |
Load |
49.9 / 60 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 i7-1355U i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZAL4512HBLU, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 21FSS00100 R5 7530U, Vega 7, Kioxia BG5 KBG5AZNT512G, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 13.3" | HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.5" | Dell Latitude 9330 i7-1260U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, , IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 24% | 16% | 16% | -2% | 11% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.5 | 4.4 20% | 3.4 38% | 4.7 15% | 4.8 13% | 4 27% |
Idle Average * | 8.3 | 7.2 13% | 4.9 41% | 8.2 1% | 8.4 -1% | 6.5 22% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.1 | 8.3 9% | 9.3 -2% | 8.4 8% | 8.6 5% | 6.8 25% |
Load Average * | 49.9 | 21.6 57% | 41.9 16% | 36.8 26% | 47.1 6% | 48 4% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.4 | 32.1 24% | 36.4 14% | 30.4 28% | 51.6 -22% | 52.3 -23% |
Load Maximum * | 60 | 49.3 18% | 67.5 -13% | 49.9 17% | 65.9 -10% | 55.2 8% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
上述普遍较高的功耗会影响电池寿命。在相同的平衡功耗模式下,英特尔设备的网络浏览时间仅为 6 个多小时,而 AMD 设备则为 7.5 个小时。即使启用联想快速充电功能,充电时间也比预期的慢,约为 2 小时。
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 i7-1355U i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 46 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 21FSS00100 R5 7530U, Vega 7, 46 Wh | HP Elite Dragonfly Folio 13.5 G3 i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 53 Wh | Dell Latitude 9330 i7-1260U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 50 Wh | MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 70 Wh | Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 61 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 25% | 52% | 52% | 81% | 96% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 371 | 463 25% | 565 52% | 564 52% | 672 81% | 726 96% |
Load | 91 | 158 | 140 | 109 | ||
Reader / Idle | 1637 | 923 | 1267 |
Pros
Cons
结论:用电池续航时间和更安静的风扇换取 Thunderbolt 和更快的图形处理能力
关于英特尔版本的 ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4,最令人惊讶的发现可能是 CPU 性能节流比预期的要严重。虽然我们从不指望任何酷睿 U 处理器能长时间保持较高的 Turbo Boost 时钟速率,但联想这款特殊机型的酷睿 i7 处理器的节流程度却超过了大多数采用完全相同 CPU 的笔记本电脑。这种性能上的不足削弱了英特尔对 AMD 的关键优势,尤其是在 AMD 配置上,节流问题并不严重。
另一个值得一提的是,英特尔版本的功耗更高,导致运行时间缩短了 1 到 2 个小时。因此,重视电池续航时间的用户可能会选择 AMD 版本的 ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4。
除非你真的需要英特尔提供的额外图形性能和 Thunderbolt 支持,否则 AMD 版的 ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 对大多数感兴趣的用户来说应该足够了。
选择英特尔版机型而非 AMD 版的主要原因是 vPro(而非 AMD PRO)、Thunderbolt 支持以及更快的图形性能和单线程 CPU 性能。除此之外,AMD SKU 在多线程 CPU 性能、电池续航时间和价格方面都占优势。
价格和供应情况
截至发稿时,联想尚未出货ThinkPad L13 Yoga Gen 4。不过,CDW 目前正在出货我们的酷睿 i7 配置,售价 1419 美元。
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga G4 i7-1355U
- 10/30/2023 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.