联想ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500工作站回顾。比戴尔Precision 7670更快
ThinkPad P16 G1是新一代的16英寸ThinkPad工作站,旨在超越现有的16英寸ThinkPad P1系列 。它搭载了一些目前最快的移动CPU和工作站GPU,分别达到Core i9-12950HX和RTX A5500,成为市场上最快的移动工作站之一。我们配置的单位售价约为9000美元。当然,配备较慢的集成UHD显卡或英特尔ARC Pro A30M的低端SKU也有,起价反而为3400美元。
该机型直接与其他高端移动工作站和一些Nvidia Studio笔记本电脑竞争,如戴尔Precision 7670,华硕ProArt StudioBook Pro 16,微星CreatorPro Z16P, 或惠普ZBook Studio 16 G9 。请看我们对ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A2000 配置的完整评论,以了解更多关于该机型的机箱和其他物理特征。这篇评论将侧重于用户在配置最高端CPU和GPU选项的情况下对ThinkPad P16 G1的性能有何期待。
更多联想评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
91 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 30.23 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
v (old) | 12 / 2021 | Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 21.4 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
89.1 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2022 | Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 25.95 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
88.2 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB i7-12850HX, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 30.23 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
84.3 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 19 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
90.1 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 19 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
SD卡阅读器
集成读卡器提供的传输速率只是平均水平。将1GB的图片从我们的UHS-II测试卡移到桌面上需要14秒,而Precision 7670的时间还不到一半。对于像我们的ThinkPad P1这样的高端移动工作站,我们期待着更多一点。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST (AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA (Angelbird AV PRO V60) | |
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB (AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST (AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA (Angelbird AV PRO V60) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB (AV Pro V60) |
沟通
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance |
网络摄像头
维护
底部面板由12颗飞利浦螺钉固定。必须卸下键盘才能接触到WAN模块、主M.2 SSD插槽和四个SODIMM插槽中的两个。联想有一个官方维护手册供终端用户参考。
有趣的是,ThinkPad P16 G1是极少数配备可拆卸GPU的笔记本电脑之一。除非出于维修或更换的目的,一般不建议更换笔记本显卡。
配件和保修
除了交流电适配器和文件外,零售盒中没有任何额外的东西。
一年的有限保修期,而戴尔Precision 7670的标准保修期为三年。不过,如果需要,联想在一年的期限内提供现场服务。
显示
联想提供了四种不同的60赫兹显示器选项,所有这些都是经过潘通工厂校准的直流调光。我们下面的测量结果只反映了加粗的选项,而我们第二个配备RTX A2000 GPU的设备配备了1600p选项。
- 1920 x 1200,非触摸,IPS,300尼特,哑光,100% sRGB
- 2560 x 1600,非触摸,IPS,400尼特,哑光,100% sRGB
- 3840 x 2400,非触摸,IPS,600尼特,哑光,100% AdobeRGB
- 3840 x 2400,触摸,OLED,400尼特,光面,100% DCI-P3
我们的独立测量可以确认AdobeRGB的全覆盖和600尼特的亮度。然而,尽管有600尼特的目标,亮度分布也只是平均水平。例如,我们显示器的左上角象限比右下角象限要亮29%(642尼特对497尼特)。选择OLED面板会改善亮度分布,但考虑到ThinkPad P1 G1的要价,我们对IPS面板的期望更高。
值得注意的是,联想在ThinkPad P1 G1上使用了相同的LP160UQ1-SPB1 IPS面板,用于其其他16英寸ThinkPad型号,包括ThinkPad P1 G4和ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4.
|
Brightness Distribution: 77 %
Center on Battery: 601.9 cd/m²
Contrast: 1281:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.45 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 LP160UQ1-SPB1, IPS, 3840x2400, 16" | Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 ATNA60YV02-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance Samsung 160YV03, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB NE160QDM-N63 , IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16" | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST B160QAN02.N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA BOE0A52, IPS, 3840x2400, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 8% | 8% | -12% | 3% | 3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 82.9 | 99.9 21% | 99.9 21% | 71.5 -14% | 97.6 18% | 97.5 18% |
sRGB Coverage | 98.9 | 100 1% | 100 1% | 100 1% | 99.9 1% | 99.9 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 95.9 | 98.6 3% | 98.1 2% | 73.3 -24% | 87.4 -9% | 86.3 -10% |
Response Times | 96% | 96% | 23% | 76% | 75% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 45.6 ? | 2 ? 96% | 1.84 ? 96% | 37.7 ? 17% | 12.8 ? 72% | 15.3 ? 66% |
Response Time Black / White * | 36.8 ? | 2 ? 95% | 1.92 ? 95% | 26.3 ? 29% | 7.4 ? 80% | 6.1 ? 83% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 59.52 ? | ||||
Screen | -2% | -36% | -4% | 9% | 16% | |
Brightness middle | 601.9 | 353 -41% | 325.2 -46% | 424 -30% | 407 -32% | 554 -8% |
Brightness | 569 | 360 -37% | 328 -42% | 398 -30% | 388 -32% | 516 -9% |
Brightness Distribution | 77 | 96 25% | 97 26% | 90 17% | 88 14% | 84 9% |
Black Level * | 0.47 | 0.24 49% | 0.36 23% | 0.47 -0% | ||
Contrast | 1281 | 1767 38% | 1131 -12% | 1179 -8% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.45 | 2.45 -0% | 4.59 -87% | 2.6 -6% | 1.3 47% | 1 59% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.46 | 3.75 16% | 7.65 -72% | 4.9 -10% | 2.5 44% | 2.4 46% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 1.88 28% | 2.5 4% | 4.1 -58% | 2.1 19% | 1.6 38% |
Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.31 95% | 2.1 105% | 2.13 103% | 2.26 97% | 2.29 96% |
CCT | 6805 96% | 6441 101% | 6541 99% | 7252 90% | 6437 101% | 6458 101% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.77 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.6 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 34% /
19% | 23% /
-0% | 2% /
-2% | 29% /
18% | 31% /
22% |
* ... smaller is better
颜色配置文件可以通过预装的X-Rite Color Assistant软件来改变。尽管我们的面板完全覆盖了AdobeRGB,但它目前似乎是有问题的,因为颜色并不像开箱时那样准确。例如,当设置为sRGB模式时,平均灰度和色彩deltaE值将分别只有2.6和2.45,而设置为AdobeRGB模式时则为4.8和3.87。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
36.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise | |
↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
45.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise | |
↘ 24.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
室外能见度很好,因为显示屏比其他大多数笔记本电脑更亮,300至400 nit的范围更常见。然而,仍然建议尽可能在阴凉处工作,因为阳光直射会降低图像质量和色彩。
业绩
测试条件
在运行以下任何性能基准测试之前,我们通过Windows和Nvidia控制面板分别将我们的设备设置为性能模式和dGPU模式。建议用户熟悉预装的联想Vantage软件,因为它是联想特定BIOS更新、功能、保修状态等的中心枢纽。
没有Xeon CPU选项,因此不支持ECC RAM。然而,GPU的ECC状态可以通过Nvidia控制面板切换为开或关。
处理器
原始的多线程性能要比现在快10%左右。 竞争对手的酷睿i9-12900H在竞争的 微星CreatorPro Z16P.升级后的酷睿i7-12850HX配置升级到我们的 酷睿i9-12950HX的配置将提高15%的性能。也许最值得注意的是,Precision 7670大约慢了15%至20%,尽管它与我们的联想一样,配备了相同的Core i9-12950HX CPU。
涡轮增压的可持续性很好,但并不完美。例如,在循环运行CineBench R15 xT时,原来的3141分会随着时间的推移下降到~2830分,性能下降10%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 -9! |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (15499 - 22868, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (77846 - 115907, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (3426 - 5069, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (102752 - 104726, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (10134 - 12823, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (37146 - 57340, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (72599 - 181128, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (8455 - 12432, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (35479 - 42655, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB |
系统性能
PCMark分数是我们在任何移动工作站上看到的最高的一些分数。我们的系统甚至超过了 戴尔Precision 7670它的CPU和GPU选项与ThinkPad P16 G1相同。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU (6883 - 7236, n=3) | |
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU (10898 - 11465, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU (8054 - 9489, n=3) | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU (9155 - 9944, n=3) | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB |
CrossMark / Overall | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU (1801 - 1889, n=3) | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU (1684 - 1785, n=3) | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU (2042 - 2192, n=3) | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU (1501 - 1585, n=3) | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB |
PCMark 10 Score | 7236 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (59731 - 64732, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (59744 - 70359, n=7) | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
Average Intel Core i9-12950HX (57750 - 67899, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示,在打开我们的主页的多个浏览器标签时,存在轻微的DPC问题,这对于一台工作站来说是令人失望的。在60FPS下的4K视频播放是非常好的,在我们的测试视频中只有一个丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的A2000配置将配备美光3400固态硬盘,而我们的A5500配置则配备了一个 WD SN810 OPAL固态硬盘代替。两者之间的连续读取和写入率是相当的,但我们的WD硬盘在大约5分钟的压力后似乎有问题,以维持最大的传输率,正如我们下面的对比图所示。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE -34! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 | |
Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance -1! | |
Average NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU | |
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 -19! | |
MSI WE76 11UM-456 -9! | |
HP ZBook Fury 15 G8 -1! | |
MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST -17! | |
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 -17! | |
HP ZBook Studio G7 -17! | |
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA -9! | |
Dell Precision 5000 5470 -9! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB -17! |
3DMark 11 Performance | 32536 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 54323 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 25940 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 10760 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 185.9 | 183.4 | 177.7 | 124.4 | 103.5 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 489.4 | 329.9 | 211.8 | 110.4 | 63.7 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 194.3 | 174.5 | 166.1 | 156.3 | 132.8 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 212 | 142.5 | 113.1 | 83.5 | 45.4 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 155.8 | 137.6 | 108.8 | 93.7 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 442 | 264 | 223 | 197.7 | 138.6 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 132.3 | 117.7 | 96.1 | 80.7 | 47 | 20.4 |
排放
系统噪音
在默认的平衡模式下,尽管内部有高性能的处理器,但风扇保持安静的时间比预期的长。例如,当运行3DMark 06时,在第一个基准场景结束时,风扇噪音最高只有28 dB(A)。要经过多次运行,风扇才会跳动到高达40 dB(A)的更大的转速范围。
如下表所示,在性能模式下运行要求更高的负载时,风扇噪音最高将超过50分贝(A),明显高于包括Precision 7670在内的竞争工作站。当然,这些替代品也比我们的联想配置要慢。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.1 / 23.1 / 23.1 dB(A) |
Load |
| 28.9 / 51.4 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.1 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB | Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0) | Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, i9-12950HX | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-12850HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -14% | -16% | -6% | -11% | -9% | |
off / environment * | 23.1 | 26 -13% | 23.9 -3% | 23.2 -0% | 24.1 -4% | 24 -4% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.1 | 26 -13% | 24 -4% | 23.2 -0% | 27.1 -17% | 24 -4% |
Idle Average * | 23.1 | 26 -13% | 24 -4% | 23.2 -0% | 27.1 -17% | 27.7 -20% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.1 | 26.5 -15% | 38 -65% | 23.2 -0% | 27.1 -17% | 27.7 -20% |
Load Average * | 28.9 | 42 -45% | 46.3 -60% | 47.8 -65% | 42.9 -48% | 39.8 -38% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 51.6 | 41.9 19% | 34.1 34% | 44 15% | 44.3 14% | |
Load Maximum * | 51.4 | 43 16% | 47.9 7% | 56.3 -10% | 47 9% | 47.7 7% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
即使在没有运行应用程序的情况下在桌面上空转,表面温度也比预期的要高。例如,底部的温度可以达到37摄氏度,而Precision 7670上只有31摄氏度。如果运行更高的负载,联想的这些热点可以达到49摄氏度或更高,而键盘中心可以达到40摄氏度。如果笔记本电脑放在腿上而不是桌子上,皮肤温度会感觉不舒服。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.8 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.4 °C / 90.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-4.6 °C / -8.3 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU | Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU | Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance Intel Core i9-12950HX, NVIDIA RTX A5500 Laptop GPU | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB Intel Core i7-12850HX, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU | HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -1% | -3% | 17% | -3% | 9% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 44.8 | 45.7 -2% | 53 -18% | 43.1 4% | 56.3 -26% | 38.7 14% |
Maximum Bottom * | 49.8 | 48.3 3% | 43.2 13% | 39.9 20% | 68.3 -37% | 53.4 -7% |
Idle Upper Side * | 30.6 | 35.3 -15% | 36.8 -20% | 26 15% | 25.2 18% | 27.3 11% |
Idle Bottom * | 38.6 | 34.4 11% | 33.8 12% | 27.6 28% | 25.9 33% | 31.6 18% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当处理器处于重载状态时,系统肯定是紧张的。例如,当运行Prime95时,CPU时钟速率和电路板功耗将分别提升到4.1 GHz和135 W。不幸的是,核心温度几乎会立即飙升到100摄氏度,因此时钟频率会迅速下降,以防止更高的温度。该处理器最终将稳定在3 GHz、82 W和100 C,这意味着它正在挑战ThinkPad P16 G1冷却解决方案的极限。在配备相同处理器的Precision 7670上重复这一测试,将导致2.3 GHz的较慢稳定时钟速率和78 C的较低核心温度。
当运行 Witcher 3代表高负载时,GPU时钟速率、内存时钟和温度将分别稳定在1477 MHz、2000 MHz和78 C,而在类似条件下,Precision 7670则为1417 MHz、1750 MHz和82 C。联想的板卡功耗也会更高,为129W,而戴尔的板卡功耗仅为100W,这将解释上述GPU性能优势。
用电池供电运行限制了性能。在电池上进行的Fire Strike 测试,物理学和图形学得分分别为18903和12395分,而在电源上则为31226和28885分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(°C) | GPU平均温度(°C) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 39 | 39 |
Prime95压力 | 3.0 | -- | 100 | 45 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 2.1 - 2.8 | ~500 - 1550 | 88 - 100 | 75 |
Witcher 3 应力 | ~1.2 | 1477 | 72 | 78 |
发言人
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
消耗功率
闲置时的功耗比Precision 7670低几瓦,可能是因为后者的OLED面板要求更高。当运行更高的负载如 Witcher 3然而,联想的功耗会明显高于戴尔(208瓦对159瓦)。正如我们上面的基准测试所显示的那样,较高的耗电量与比戴尔的竞争机型更快的CPU和GPU性能相吻合。
尽管电力用户可能会欣赏额外的性能,但我们满载的联想比大多数其他移动工作站的要求要高得多。事实上,当CPU和GPU处于高利用率时,中等大小(约15 x 8.6 x 2.6厘米)的230瓦交流适配器可能不足以为机器供电。我们能够从230瓦的适配器测量到286瓦的临时最大电流,然后最终下降并稳定在223瓦左右。因此,在运行高要求的负载时,预计电池充电速度会减慢,甚至变成负值。当运行 Witcher 3例如,当连续运行90分钟时,我们观察到我们的电池水平从100%下降到87%。类似的行为也出现在 旧的XPS 17或 Precision 5750.太糟糕了,联想在结账时没有提供高于230W的交流适配器选项。
用低端的RTX A2000进行配置,可以将消耗量降低一半左右。在这种情况下,230瓦的交流适配器就足够了。
Off / Standby | 0.03 / 1.6 Watt |
Idle | 7.5 / 20.1 / 40 Watt |
Load |
137 / 285.9 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 2TB, IPS, 3840x2400, 16" | Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0), OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, , OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB i7-12850HX, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16" | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS, 3840x2400, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 14% | -35% | 45% | 19% | 28% | |
Idle Minimum * | 7.5 | 12.4 -65% | 16.4 -119% | 5.1 32% | 10.8 -44% | 7.2 4% |
Idle Average * | 20.1 | 16.5 18% | 35.9 -79% | 9.2 54% | 16.3 19% | 18.1 10% |
Idle Maximum * | 40 | 25 37% | 47 -18% | 9.9 75% | 16.9 58% | 18.5 54% |
Load Average * | 137 | 132 4% | 147.1 -7% | 124.1 9% | 111.7 18% | 112.8 18% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 208 | 132 37% | 158.8 24% | 87.7 58% | 152.1 27% | 106.7 49% |
Load Maximum * | 285.9 | 134 53% | 311 -9% | 168.9 41% | 177.4 38% | 186 35% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
运行时间比我们较小的RTX A2000 SKU短几个小时,如果设置为平衡电源配置文件,总共不到6小时。
从空电到满电大约需要2小时。然而,联想的估计充电时间并不那么准确,因为Vantage可能会显示,在自动重新校准之前,一开始长达4小时。请记住,如果运行上面提到的高要求的应用程序,充电速度会明显减慢。
该系统不能通过USB-C充电。
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500 i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, 94 Wh | Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Dell Precision 7000 7670 Performance i9-12950HX, RTX A5500 Laptop GPU, 93 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 21D6001DMB i7-12850HX, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, 94 Wh | MSI CreatorPro Z16P B12UKST i7-12700H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -14% | -20% | 61% | -1% | 8% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 350 | 301 -14% | 280 -20% | 564 61% | 348 -1% | 377 8% |
H.264 | 106 | 509 | ||||
Witcher 3 ultra | 94 | |||||
Load | 106 | 63 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 230瓦的交流适配器是不够的
从纯粹的性能角度来看,ThinkPad P16 G1是目前最快的移动工作站之一,无论屏幕大小如何。它的酷睿i9-12950HX CPU和RTX A5500 GPU的性能略微但始终超过了 Precision 7670即使戴尔的机型有类似的处理器选项。
有两个关键的缺点,我们希望联想能在未来的迭代中解决。首先,在运行高要求的负载时,CPU温度比平均温度高很多。当然,高温并不出乎意料,但是当上述戴尔型号的相同CPU在类似条件下几乎没有突破80摄氏度的时候,100摄氏度的高温实在是太让人舒服了。高温也许是为稍快的性能所付出的代价。
其次,230瓦的交流适配器正在为100多瓦的CPU和130瓦的GPU供电而大汗淋漓。在运行高要求的负载时,这种挣扎是可以观察到的,因为在某些情况下,系统充电速度会明显减慢,甚至开始消耗电池。当我们能够从一个额定功率只有230W的交流适配器上测量到285W的峰值电流时,那么这里显然存在一个瓶颈。考虑到我们的配置水平,一个更大的280W或330W交流适配器会更合适。
ThinkPad P16 Gen 1将性能最大化,即使这意味着更高的功耗和更高的核心温度。然而,考虑到我们最高端配置的非常苛刻的处理器,230W的交流适配器可能过于保守了。
然而,尽管温度很高,230瓦电源砖不足,但整体的高系统性能是不可否认的。请确保退出任何苛刻的应用,以获得体面的充电速度。
Lenovo ThinkPad P16 G1 RTX A5500
- 02/06/2023 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.