联想 ThinkPad T14s G4 英特尔笔记本电脑评测:OLED 取代电池续航时间
ThinkPad T 系列历史悠久,始于 2000 年,当时还是 IBM 的 ThinkPad。目前,联想拥有 ThinkPad 品牌的时间已经超过了 IBM,ThinkPad T 系列可能是历史最悠久的笔记本电脑系列之一。在面向商务用户的 T 系列 ThinkPad 中,ThinkPad T14s 是当之无愧的佼佼者--它是 ThinkPad T 系列中最薄、最轻、最昂贵的机型。今天评测的这款联想 ThinkPad T14s Gen 4 配备了英特尔 Raptor Lake 处理器和优质 OLED 屏幕。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.1 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
89.1 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2022 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE i5-1235U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
90.5 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
90.3 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Dell Latitude 7440 i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.2 kg | 17.95 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
90.6 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
底盘:深黑色碳纤维加镁合金底盘
乍一看,人们可能会认为 ThinkPads 的设计从未改变过。但即使是这个最保守的笔记本电脑系列也会有变化,尽管这些变化更多的是进化性的,而不是革命性的。
有时,联想也会改变一些东西,然后再恢复这些改变。在 ThinkPad T14s Gen 2 上,联想推出了一种新的深灰色机身颜色,而不是常规的黑色。联想ThinkPad T14s G4则是一次 "大转弯",它现在换上了 "深黑色"。与之前的深灰色相比,新旧配色无疑显得更加高档。遗憾的是,ThinkPad 依然很容易显得油腻和肮脏。
结构并没有改变。联想结合了三种不同的材料:显示屏盖采用碳纤维塑料,掌托采用镁合金,底盖采用铝合金。从外观上看不出材料的不同--如前所述,ThinkPad 被涂成了黑色。机箱的稳定性非常好,尽管并非百分之百完美。在这方面和触觉质量方面,ThinkPad T14s G4 毫无疑问要优于 ThinkPad T14。
与 ThinkPad 一样,联想 ThinkPad T14s G4 可以 180 度打开。两个下拉式铰链和银色金属盖始终牢牢固定住屏幕,没有任何晃动。
占地面积和重量与前代机型相同。与竞争对手相比,联想 ThinkPad T14s Gen 4 比Latitude 和 EliteBook 更薄。戴尔 戴尔Latitude 7440更小巧一些。与 惠普 EliteBook 845 G10相比,ThinkPad 的重量明显更轻,只有 1.3 千克而不是 1.5 千克。
连接性集成 LTE 的 ThinkPad T14s G4
在端口方面,联想ThinkPad T14s Gen 4和ThinkPad T14s Gen 3没有任何变化。 ThinkPad T14s Gen 3.与稍厚的 ThinkPad T14 4 代T14s 上没有 RJ45 以太网接口。
交流
英特尔 AX211 的 WiFi 性能无可挑剔,因为 WiFi 6E 模块的工作速度快且可靠。
除了 WiFi 模块,评测设备还包含一个 4G/LTE 模块。Quectel EM05-G 是一个 CAT4 模块。并不是每种配置的 ThinkPad T14s G4 都有 WWAN 模块,有些型号甚至没有天线。对于联想 ThinkPad 的最高端型号,还有 5G 选项。
网络摄像头
联想将网络摄像头的分辨率从 1080p 提高到了 500 万像素。这使得图像更加清晰,但在色彩和光照方面与以前相比并无太大改进。
安全
通过摄像头快门 "ThinkShutter",联想增加了一项提高隐私和安全性的功能,企业客户一定会喜欢。dTPM 芯片、Kensington 锁槽、智能卡读卡器、指纹识别器以及普通网络摄像头旁边的红外摄像头也是如此。
配件
联想在 ThinkPad T14s Gen 4 的包装盒中放入了一个现代、小巧的 65 W GaN 充电器。除充电器外,没有其他出厂配件。
维护
底盖由五颗固定螺丝和后端的几个夹子固定。它很容易拆卸,但内部并无太多可做之处。固态硬盘可以升级,WWAN 模块也是模块化的,但内存和 WiFi 模块是板载焊接的。电池和风扇不是焊接的,而是拧在一起的,这些部件很容易更换。与 联想 ThinkPad T14 G4ThinkPad T14s G4 在更换键盘时需要拆卸键盘。
保修
出厂时,联想为这款德国配置的 ThinkPad T14s G4 提供三年保修和上门服务。这项保修服务在国际范围内同样有效。内置电池享受一年有限保修。在德国,该配置在保修期的第一年还可享受现场服务。在整个保修期内都可以预订这项服务,但需要支付高昂的附加费用,五年的保修期也是如此。
输入设备:没有使用 ThinkPad 键盘进行实验
键盘
当联想更换输入设备时,总会引起一片哗然。幸运的是,联想 ThinkPad T14s Gen 4 与前代产品相比没有任何变化 ThinkPad T14s G3.全尺寸键盘(除键盘右侧的部分按键外)的布局非常合理,包括分组的 F 键、专用的上翻/下翻键和大小适中的方向键。
联想也没有对按键进行自我试验,不像戴尔的 Latitude 9440.背光 Chiclet 键盘的键程为 1.5 毫米,具有典型的软着地但仍然清晰的 ThinkPad 键入感。尽管键程不如老款 ThinkPad 那么宽松,但在这款键盘上打字仍是一种享受。
触摸板和轨迹点
联想 ThinkPad T14s G4 的触摸板尺寸为 11.5 x 6 厘米。其实并不大,只是足够大而已。表面由 Mylar 塑料制成,联想称其为 "类玻璃"。的确,这种塑料非常光滑,第一次触摸时可能会被误认为是玻璃,但第二次触摸时的触感质量并不高。不过,这种表面可以让手指轻松滑动。铰链式点击板的点击机制不是很好,它可以被压在表面区域的下部--可以进一步减震。触摸板的软件性能相当完美。
一如既往,B/G/H 键之间的指向杆是典型的红色 TrackPoint。它是触摸板的最佳替代品,在某些任务中比触摸板更好用,例如当用户戴着手套或必须在火车或飞机等狭窄环境中工作时。不过,TrackPoint 需要用户适应,这就是为什么大多数人可能不会使用它,而只是依赖触摸板的原因。TrackPoint 的套件之一是触摸板上方的三个扁平按键,中间的按键在按住不放时可充当滚动按钮。TrackPoint 按钮运行完美。
显示屏带 PWM 和无限对比度的 OLED 面板
联想 ThinkPad T14s Gen 4 英特尔版总共有六种不同的屏幕可供选择,但所有屏幕都有一些共同的特点:屏幕纵横比(16:10)和屏幕尺寸(14 英寸)。
- WUXGA (1,920 x 1,200), IPS, 300 cd/m², 45 % NTSC, 雾面
- WUXGA(1,920 x 1,200),IPS,300 cd/m²,45 % NTSC,亚光,On-Cell 触摸屏
- WUXGA(1,920 x 1,200),IPS,400 cd/m²,100 % sRGB,亚光,低功耗
- WUXGA(1,920 x 1,200),IPS,500 cd/m²,100 % sRGB,亚光,On-Cell Touch,隐私保护器
- 2.2K(2,240 x 1,400),IPS,300 cd/m²,100 % sRGB,哑光
- 2.8K(2,880 x 1,800),OLED,400 cd/m²,100 % DCI P3,半哑光
我们测量的平均值仅为 320 cd/m²,低于承诺的 400 cd/m²。这使得该面板远低于戴尔和惠普竞争对手的 2.5K IPS 面板。虽然 ThinkPad 在这方面跟不上,但 OLED 面板在对比度方面很难被击败,因为它基本上是无限的。在这方面,IPS 竞争对手完全跟不上。此外,OLED 显示屏的响应时间更短,因此反应速度更快,没有背光出血现象,屏幕亮度分布非常均匀。
|
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 317 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 5
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE ATNA40YK15-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE MNE007JA1-1, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AUO6DA8, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Dell Latitude 7440 AU Optronics B140QAX, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES CMN1435, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE MNE007JA1-1, LTPS IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -20% | -5% | -16% | -18% | -19% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 67.8 -32% | 98.3 -2% | 75.4 -25% | 70.6 -29% | 69.4 -31% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 98.6 -1% | 99.8 0% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 99.8 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 97.6 | 70.1 -28% | 86.2 -12% | 76.2 -22% | 72.4 -26% | 71.4 -27% |
Response Times | -2475% | -676% | -3196% | -3185% | -2135% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.2 ? | 41.4 ? -3350% | 12.7 ? -958% | 56 ? -4567% | 59.7 ? -4875% | 36.3 ? -2925% |
Response Time Black / White * | 1.6 ? | 27.2 ? -1600% | 7.9 ? -394% | 30.8 ? -1825% | 25.5 ? -1494% | 23.1 ? -1344% |
PWM Frequency | 364 ? | |||||
Screen | 12% | 52% | -4% | 26% | 38% | |
Brightness middle | 317 | 312 -2% | 546 72% | 517.3 63% | 409 29% | 396 25% |
Brightness | 320 | 301 -6% | 564 76% | 488 53% | 391 22% | 379 18% |
Brightness Distribution | 96 | 93 -3% | 86 -10% | 88 -8% | 92 -4% | 92 -4% |
Black Level * | 0.16 | 0.38 | 0.34 | 0.27 | 0.26 | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 2.2 55% | 1.3 73% | 3.3 33% | 2.3 53% | 1.3 73% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.4 | 5.6 46% | 5.3 49% | 7.81 25% | 4.4 58% | 2.7 74% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 5 | 1.3 74% | 1.2 76% | 1.02 80% | 0.9 82% | 0.7 86% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 2.7 -80% | 1.1 27% | 5.6 -273% | 2.4 -60% | 1.6 -7% |
Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.11 104% | 2.27 97% | 2.37 93% | 2.06 107% | 2.14 103% |
CCT | 6364 102% | 6196 105% | 6463 101% | 6804 96% | 6293 103% | 6554 99% |
Contrast | 1950 | 1437 | 1521 | 1515 | 1523 | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -828% /
-411% | -210% /
-84% | -1072% /
-539% | -1059% /
-520% | -705% /
-339% |
* ... smaller is better
该面板不能很好地校准 sRGB 色域,导致校准后的 deltaE 高达 5.0,甚至比校准前的 deltaE 4.9 更差。
联想 ThinkPad T14s G4 OLED 的色域覆盖率非常好。sRGB 和 DCI P3 的覆盖率为 100%,AdobeRGB 的覆盖率也接近 97.6%。这款面板应该能很好地满足宽色域的照片编辑需求。
得益于高对比度,尽管屏幕亮度不高,但在户外也能使用。OLED 屏幕是半光泽的,因此会有一些反光,但反光的程度有所降低。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.9 ms rise | |
↘ 0.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise | |
↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 364 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 364 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 364 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
与大多数 OLED 屏幕一样,这款三星面板使用 PWM 调节亮度。PWM 频率各不相同:亮度为 0/10 时,频率为 120 赫兹。亮度为 1/10 时,频率增加到 180 赫兹。屏幕再亮一点,频率就会跳到 360 赫兹左右。脉宽调制频率相当低,甚至在亮度为 100 % 时也处于激活状态,因此对 PWM 比较敏感的人应该避免使用这种面板。
性能:Raptor Lake U15 在多核负载时跟不上
ThinkPad T14s Gen 4 可配备英特尔和 AMD 两种处理器。联想提供了七种不同的英特尔处理器,其中四种是 "U15 "级处理器(即酷睿 i5-1335U, i5-1345U, i7-1355U, i7-1365U)和三个 "P28 "级 (酷睿 i5-1340P, i7-1360P, i7-1370P).对于终端消费者来说,只有 U15 变体可供选择,因为 P28 CPU 专供通过 "特别竞标 "订购这一代产品的大型企业客户使用。
集成的英特尔 GPU 始终承担着 GPU 的任务,这里没有专用 GPU 可供选择。根据处理器的不同,ThinkPad 可以配备 Iris Xe w/80 EUs或 Iris Xe w/96 EUsi7 CPU 的 GPU 性能更强。内存始终是焊接的,有 16 或 32 GB LPDDR5X-4800 可选。单个 M.2 2280 SSD 最大容量为 2 TB,用于存储。
测试条件
与其他制造商不同,也与联想的消费类产品不同,ThinkPads 不使用任何专有软件来设置能源配置文件。相反,联想在 Windows 设置中使用原生的 Windows 能源管理系统。在这里,有三种能源配置文件可供选择,它们设定了功率限制(PL1 = 持续负载下的性能,PL2 = 短期提升性能),并调节处理器和系统的功耗:
- 最佳电池寿命:PL1 11 瓦/PL2 11 瓦
- 平衡:PL1 14 瓦/PL2 25 瓦
- 最佳性能:PL1 24 瓦 / PL2 50 瓦
处理器
英特尔英特尔酷睿 i7-1355U是 "猛禽湖 "一代处理器,属于 U15 系列。与大多数 U15 芯片一样,这款处理器有两个性能核心和八个效率核心,因此总共有 10 个核心。时钟频率在 1.7 至 5 GHz(P 核心)和 1.2 至 3.7 GHz(E 核心)之间。为了与其他处理器进行直接比较,我们的 CPU 列表可以使用。
在 24 W 的持续负载下,联想 ThinkPad T14s G4 英特尔版的 U15 CPU 可以很好地运行。单核心性能和短期多核提升性能尤其出色。
但在持续负载下的多核性能就没那么好了。在我们目前测试的所有 Raptor Lake ThinkPad 中,它的性能处于中等水平。特别是与 ThinkPad X13 Gen 4 英特尔相比,ThinkPad T14s G4 的速度更快。不过,与基于 AMD 的 EliteBook 845 G10相比,无论惠普使用的是 U 级还是 HS 级 CPU,T14s 都相形见绌。AMD 的前身 ThinkPad T14s G3 AMD也要快得多。英特尔 T14s G4 仅在单核性能方面明显优于 AMD 笔记本电脑。
在电池模式下,我们没有发现这款联想笔记本的 CPU 性能受到限制。
Cinebench R15 multi sustained load
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE | |
Average of class Office | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G4 21EX004QGE |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average of class Office (1577 - 15743, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (6936 - 10252, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G4 21EX004QGE |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (1687 - 1889, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G4 21EX004QGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
Average of class Office (618 - 1995, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE | |
Average of class Office (590 - 5980, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (2849 - 3907, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G4 21EX004QGE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (654 - 725, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G4 21EX004QGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average of class Office (229 - 766, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
Average of class Office (246 - 2642, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (1206 - 1735, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G4 21EX004QGE |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (237 - 267, n=18) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G4 21EX004QGE | |
Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=93, last 2 years) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G4 21EX004QGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Average of class Office (208 - 1956, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (328 - 503, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (5301 - 5911, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G4 21EX004QGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average of class Office (2972 - 6687, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (7507 - 9328, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G4 21EX004QGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE | |
Average of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=93, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (1678 - 1872, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G4 21EX004QGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
Average of class Office (510 - 1995, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average of class Office (1.72 - 18.7, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (7.83 - 11.4, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G4 21EX004QGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average of class Office (31.3 - 129.6, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (41.1 - 108.6, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G4 21EX004QGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.135, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (0.4481 - 0.832, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21HD0043GE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G4 21EX004QGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
Average of class Office | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
Average of class Office (763 - 24250, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (5673 - 8424, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
Average of class Office (4113 - 102228, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (29580 - 42706, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
Average of class Office (287 - 4551, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (1529 - 2200, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (21547 - 66907, n=18) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
Average of class Office (404 - 14288, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (4045 - 5426, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
Average of class Office (2075 - 54365, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (14596 - 21627, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average of class Office (7254 - 155900, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (31432 - 75408, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average of class Office (78 - 1018, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (454 - 684, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
Average of class Office (432 - 12755, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (2991 - 4453, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (21800 - 46154, n=18) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average of class Office (4814 - 54971, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE |
系统性能
我们不能抱怨系统在日常使用中的性能。在合成基准测试中,ThinkPad 笔记本电脑处于中等水平。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5455 - 5933, n=15) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Average of class Office (2463 - 7344, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10203 - 11822, n=15) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6763 - 7536, n=15) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
Average of class Office (2049 - 9773, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5723 - 6712, n=15) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1478 - 1643, n=15) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=87, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1444 - 1665, n=15) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=87, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1563 - 1732, n=15) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
Average of class Office (340 - 1982, n=87, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1217 - 1681, n=15) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE |
PCMark 10 Score | 5652 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (35017 - 71600, n=18) | |
Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (38551 - 73377, n=18) | |
Average of class Office (7325 - 127282, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (35910 - 93342, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (72.2 - 346, n=18) | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average of class Office (6.9 - 185.2, n=92, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
联想 ThinkPad T14s Gen 4 Intel 存在 DPC 延迟问题,这可能会导致系统在视频/音频编辑时出现卡顿。不过,在 Youtube 测试中,我们没有看到很多掉帧现象。此外,这个问题通常可以通过更新驱动程序快速解决。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE |
* ... smaller is better
存储
在我们的评测样本中,我们发现了三星公司生产的 M.2 2280 固态硬盘。PM9A1a 通过快速 PCIe 4 连接,容量为 1 TB。在我们的基准测试中,PM9A1 的固态硬盘速度相当慢,但与其他商务笔记本及其固态硬盘相比,三星的这款固态硬盘仍然是最快的。
* ... smaller is better
Sustained load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU
我们的评测设备使用 Iris Xe w/96 EUs,因为联想 ThinkPad T14s Gen 4 的这一变体配备了 i7 处理器。它是一个集成的 GPU,没有专用内存。这使得内存配置非常重要 - 32 GB LPDDR5X-4800 在四通道模式下运行,因此内存不会限制性能。
在所有采用英特尔处理器的笔记本电脑中,T14s Gen 4 英特尔处理器的图形处理器性能最好,尽管它无法与 AMD 的最新解决方案相媲美。Iris Xe 可为简单任务和老游戏提供足够的性能,这些游戏必须降低分辨率和图形保真度。
3DMark 11 Performance | 6770 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 17675 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4633 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1761 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average of class Office (3.8 - 34, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average of class Office (3.35 - 47.8, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average of class Office (4.18 - 35.7, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Average of class Office (9.6 - 56.5, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE | |
Dell Latitude 7440 | |
Average of class Office (13.4 - 121.2, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE |
Witcher 3 FPS-Diagramm
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 100.1 | 87.6 | 24.1 | 10.2 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 83.7 | 56.2 | 30.4 | 14.5 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 98.6 | 72 | 58.4 | 51.4 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 37.1 | 22.3 | 16 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 33.8 | 26 | 29.4 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 90.4 | 38.7 | 31.4 | 25.5 |
F1 22 (2022) | 45.6 | 41.1 | 29.5 | 22.8 |
排放:温度高,风扇噪音低
噪音
遗憾的是,联想 ThinkPad T14s Gen 4 Intel 并不是最安静的商用笔记本电脑。怠速运转时,风扇大部分关闭或基本关闭,噪音仅为 25.6 dB(a)。可惜的是,T14s G4 英特尔版在中等负载下的噪音已经高于同类产品,尤其是ThinkPad T14s G3 AMD和 惠普 EliteBook 845 G10的声音更小。在满载情况下戴尔Latitude 7440联想 ThinkPad T14s G4 的噪音为 37.8 dB(a),但 AMD 竞争产品和前代产品 T14s G3 的噪音都较小。
我们没有听到线圈啸叫。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.2 / 24.2 / 25.6 dB(A) |
Load |
| 33.3 / 37.8 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.2 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1235U, SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N | HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G | Dell Latitude 7440 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1345U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 4% | 11% | 10% | 16% | |
off / environment * | 24.2 | 24.6 -2% | 22.9 5% | 22.8 6% | 22.8 6% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.2 | 24.6 -2% | 22.9 5% | 22.8 6% | 22.8 6% |
Idle Average * | 24.2 | 24.6 -2% | 22.9 5% | 22.8 6% | 22.8 6% |
Idle Maximum * | 25.6 | 24.6 4% | 22.9 11% | 22.8 11% | 22.8 11% |
Load Average * | 33.3 | 26.1 22% | 24.3 27% | 26.3 21% | 22.8 32% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.4 | 35.9 4% | 32.4 13% | 30 20% | 27.5 26% |
Load Maximum * | 37.8 | 36.3 4% | 33.9 10% | 38.3 -1% | 27.3 28% |
* ... smaller is better
热量
主动风扇的反面:机箱的触感相当凉爽。Witcher 3 测试期间的最高温度为 45.6 摄氏度/114 华氏度,虽然温度较高,但尚无危险,也只有一个热点。
压力测试期间没有出现节流现象。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.8 °C / 82 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-0.2 °C / -0.3 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE Intel Core i5-1235U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | Dell Latitude 7440 Intel Core i5-1345U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -2% | -6% | 2% | -2% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 43.4 | 43.6 -0% | 45.4 -5% | 39 10% | 49.2 -13% |
Maximum Bottom * | 37.8 | 42 -11% | 50.6 -34% | 40.6 -7% | 37.2 2% |
Idle Upper Side * | 29.7 | 28.1 5% | 26.8 10% | 28 6% | 31.1 -5% |
Idle Bottom * | 28.4 | 28.9 -2% | 26.8 6% | 28.8 -1% | 26 8% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
联想 ThinkPad T14s Gen 4 的扬声器位于键盘上方。扬声器的音量尚可,但只能算一般,面向用户的扬声器根本没有底气。惠普 EliteBook 845 G10 的扬声器也是如此。惠普 EliteBook 845 G10的扬声器也是如此,不过其立体声扬声器的音量至少要大一些。
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理:OLED 屏幕吃电池
耗电量
毫不奇怪,联想 ThinkPad T14s G4 英特尔版的空闲功耗与前代产品相比要高得多,不管是与 AMD 机型还是英特尔机型相比都是如此--经过评测的 T14s Gen 4 配备了高分辨率 OLED 屏幕。与惠普 EliteBook 845 G10和 戴尔Latitude 7440的比较更为公平,因为它们至少配备了高分辨率的 IPS 2.5K 显示屏。
64.3 瓦的最大功耗低于 65 瓦的充电器容量。
Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.7 Watt |
Idle | 4.6 / 5.4 / 6.7 Watt |
Load |
39.9 / 64.3 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE i5-1235U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Dell Latitude 7440 i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X081N, LTPS IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 16% | -46% | 13% | -14% | 21% | -31% | -14% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.6 | 2.3 50% | 4.3 7% | 3.2 30% | 4.5 2% | 2.2 52% | 5.34 ? -16% | 4.47 ? 3% |
Idle Average * | 5.4 | 4.6 15% | 10.1 -87% | 5.1 6% | 6.5 -20% | 4.4 19% | 8.55 ? -58% | 7.42 ? -37% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.7 | 5.6 16% | 11.2 -67% | 5.4 19% | 7.3 -9% | 5.1 24% | 10.8 ? -61% | 8.9 ? -33% |
Load Average * | 39.9 | 37.1 7% | 64.4 -61% | 39.1 2% | 52.5 -32% | 33.3 17% | 45.3 ? -14% | 42.1 ? -6% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 36.8 | 32.8 11% | 59.4 -61% | 39.8 -8% | 46.2 -26% | 40.1 -9% | ||
Load Maximum * | 64.3 | 65.8 -2% | 66.7 -4% | 46.6 28% | 63 2% | 48.5 25% | 67.5 ? -5% | 61.8 ? 4% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
电池寿命
联想 ThinkPad T14s Gen 4 始终配备 57 Wh 的内置电池。对于配备 OLED 的 T14s G4 Intel 而言,在 WiFi 测试(亮度为 150 cd/m²)中,电池仅能使用 7.5 小时--低于平均水平,使用暗光模式可以提高续航时间。比较中的其他笔记本电脑在这方面优于 T14s G4 Intel。
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21BR00CDGE i5-1235U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 57 Wh | HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M, 51 Wh | HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 51 Wh | Dell Latitude 7440 i5-1345U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G3 21CQ002LGE R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M, 57 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 1% | -21% | 26% | 67% | 52% | 25% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 452 | 576 27% | 471 4% | 779 72% | 781 73% | 718 59% | 611 ? 35% |
Load | 102 | 76 -25% | 56 -45% | 81 -21% | 164 61% | 148 45% | 116.7 ? 14% |
Pros
Cons
结论:配备 IPS 屏幕的英特尔 ThinkPad T14s G4 可能更好一些
联想ThinkPad T14s Gen 4英特尔版是一款不错的商务笔记本电脑,但评测配置的OLED屏幕并不均衡。
长期以来,T14s 系列一直采用碳纤维塑料和镁合金作为机身材料,因此设计轻巧而坚固。该机箱的最新机型提供了包括 LTE 在内的多种连接选项、非常出色的输入设备以及色彩丰富的优质 OLED 屏幕。不过,这块出色的屏幕也是该配置的最大弱点,因为电池续航时间低于标准。如果需要更好的电池续航能力,买家应该选择低功耗 WUXGA 屏幕。OLED 面板还具有 PWM 功能。
作为一款 Raptor Lake U15 笔记本电脑,联想 ThinkPad T14s Gen 4 具有较高的单核性能,但编译代码等任务的多核性能却有所欠缺。在这方面,同类 AMD 机型要好得多。此外,这款笔记本电脑的风扇噪音也不得不受到批评,因为它比其他商务笔记本电脑的风扇噪音更大--不过这至少带来了凉爽的机箱。
高级 OLED 屏幕导致电池续航时间短:联想 ThinkPad T14s G4 在测试的配置中并不均衡。
联想 ThinkPad T14s G4 的替代品之一可能是戴尔Latitude 7440.戴尔笔记本电脑采用高分辨率 WQXGA IPS 屏幕,而不是 OLED 面板。另一个竞争对手是惠普 EliteBook 845 G10由于采用 AMD CPU,它的多核 CPU 性能要好得多。
T14s G4 英特尔还获得了内部竞争自己的 AMD 变体,联想 ThinkPad T14s Gen 4 AMD - 该笔记本电脑的审查已经计划。
定价和可用性
在评测的配置中,联想ThinkPad T14s Gen 4 Intel在德国的售价约为2230欧元。T14s G4 Intel 在联想美国店的起价为 1,275 美元。
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE
- 10/05/2023 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.