联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 11 代笔记本电脑评测：虚拟机怪兽，CPU故障
在联想ThinkPad笔记本电脑中，ThinkPad X1 Carbon无疑是最知名的机型。作为自 2012 年以来该系列的旗舰产品，联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 已经是这款超极本类型设备的第十一代产品，其目标市场是高端企业市场--这是一款公司会为经理和首席执行官购买的设备。
我们已经评测过 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 11 代的一个非常普通的版本，配备 U15 处理器和 WUXGA 屏幕。今天，我们要测试的是这款设备更不常见的机型，其中包括顶级的 Raptor Lake P28 CPU、该机型的最大内存容量以及最昂贵的屏幕选项。这就是联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 的最高配置。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89.1 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 i7-1370P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 15.36 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 88.9 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 15.36 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 88.9 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2022 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 15.36 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 90.1 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 87.9 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 16.28 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 |
外壳：与联想 X1 Carbon Gen 10 的基本设计相同
我们之前已经对 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 的设计进行了详细评测。.简而言之，其设计与 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9和 X1 Carbon G10和 X1 Carbon G10 相比，设计保持不变。这是一款高品质的设备，机身由碳纤维和镁合金制成，非常轻巧紧凑，并涂有典型的橡胶ThinkPad黑色漆。这种设计唯一真正的缺点是，喷漆很快就会被弄脏。另外，对于 2023 年的高端设备来说，屏幕边框有点大，但这可能是由于沿用了 2021 年的设计。
OLED 版 X1 Carbon G11 的一个特别之处是盖子上的碳织图案。不过这纯粹是外观特征，ThinkPad X1 Carbon 的所有型号的盖子都是由碳纤维制成的。
连接性带 5G 功能的 X1 Carbon G11
连接性与我们的第一款评测机型几乎相同。尽管体积小、重量轻，但 X1 Carbon 拥有充足的端口和安全功能。唯一的变化是这款 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2023 出厂时配备了 5G/LTE 调制解调器，即 Fibocom FM350-GL。还有一些机型只配备了 4G/LTE 或根本没有 LTE，例如 我们的首款评测机型 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11.
维护
用户只需拧松背面边缘的五颗固定螺丝和几个卡扣，就能轻松打开内部结构。遗憾的是，联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 11 并不是模块化程度最高的设备。内存和 WiFi 都是焊接的。固态硬盘是 M.2 2280 模块，还有模块化的 M.2 2242 WWAN 卡，在该机型中是 5G/LTE 模块。内部电池只是拧在一起，而不是粘在一起，因此如果电池坏了很容易更换。
输入设备仍是 ThinkPad 的强项
该设备包含的输入设备与 我们的第一个审查样本.ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 配备了非常舒适的 ThinkPad 键盘，典型的微凹微笑键，键程为 1.5 毫米。这款背光键盘打字时手感柔软而坚固，布局合理，F 键和方向键呈倒 T 形排列，使用起来非常惬意--不过刚接触 ThinkPad 的用户可能需要将 FN 键和 Ctrl 键对调一下，因为大多数其他笔记本电脑的 FN 键和 Ctrl 键都是反过来排列的。
我们同样可以称赞鼠标的替代品--名为 "Ultranav "的触摸板和 TrackPoint 的经典组合。这两种输入设备的质量都很高，提供了两种操作鼠标指针的简便方法，其中 TrackPoint 对于拖放对象以及在飞机等狭小空间和戴手套的情况下使用设备非常有用。但需要注意的是，TrackPoint 的加入确实会导致触摸板变小，因为键盘下方与 TrackPoint 配合使用的专用鼠标按钮占用了触摸板在其他设备上所占的一些空间。
显示屏OLED 屏幕质量上乘，但也有 PWM 功能
在今年的 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 上，联想没有对屏幕的可选项做太多改变。屏幕比例（16:10）和屏幕尺寸（14 英寸）保持不变，唯一的变化是停用了前代产品的 4K（3,840 x 2,400）IPS 选项。 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10有的选项。
我们的评测机型采用了最高端的显示屏，即 2.8K（2,880 x 1,800）OLED 屏幕。该面板由三星制造，亮度略高于我们去年在联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 10 30 周年纪念版上测试过的类似三星 OLED 面板。我们测得的平均亮度约为 430 cd/m²，而不是去年型号的 400 cd/m²。请注意，我们是在 SDR 模式下进行测量的，在 HDR 模式下，屏幕的峰值亮度可能会稍好一些。与竞争对手相比，OLED 面板在屏幕亮度方面输给了戴尔和惠普各自Latitude 和 EliteBook 笔记本电脑的 WQXGA IPS 面板。不过，在响应时间、黑色值和对比度方面，OLED 面板确实具有明显的优势。在这方面，任何 IPS 屏幕都无法与之匹敌。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 427 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 5
ΔE Greyscale 0.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 ATNA40YK15-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 B140UAN02.1, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE ATNA40YK01-1, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AUO6DA8, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -15% | -0% | -4% | -14% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 75.4 -25% | 99.7 0% | 98.3 -2% | 77.2 -23% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.6 0% | 100 0% | 99.8 0% | 99.6 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 97 | 77.3 -20% | 96.5 -1% | 86.2 -11% | 77.4 -20% |
| Response Times | -3871% | -1% | -669% | -3130% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.19 ? | 64.4 ? -5312% | 1.2 ? -1% | 12.7 ? -967% | 53.5 ? -4396% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 1.68 ? | 42.5 ? -2430% | 1.6 ? 5% | 7.9 ? -370% | 33 ? -1864% |
| PWM Frequency | 363 ? | 342 ? -6% | |||
| Screen | -65% | 10% | 26% | 11% | |
| Brightness middle | 427 | 379 -11% | 400 -6% | 546 28% | 532.4 25% |
| Brightness | 427 | 383 -10% | 401 -6% | 564 32% | 502 18% |
| Brightness Distribution | 98 | 91 -7% | 97 -1% | 86 -12% | 91 -7% |
| Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.38 | 0.48 | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 3.2 29% | 2.2 51% | 1.3 71% | 2.33 48% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.6 | 7.3 24% | 4.3 55% | 5.3 45% | 5.99 38% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 5 | 1.7 66% | 2.6 48% | 1.2 76% | 0.92 82% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.7 | 4.5 -543% | 1.2 -71% | 1.1 -57% | 1.6 -129% |
| Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.19 100% | 2.22 99% | 2.27 97% | 2.17 101% |
| CCT | 6470 100% | 6249 104% | 6364 102% | 6463 101% | 6314 103% |
| Contrast | 1805 | 1437 | 1109 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1317% /
-687% | 3% /
5% | -216% /
-97% | -1044% /
-519% |
* ... smaller is better
这款屏幕的色彩很难控制，因为它是广色域机型。这意味着色彩与出厂时较小的 sRGB 色域不匹配，校准也无法改变这种情况。未来，我们希望联想能为不同的色域提供单独的色彩配置文件，这样用户就可以选择自己喜欢的模式。
屏幕的色域覆盖非常出色，完全覆盖了 sRGB 和 DCI P3 色域。即使是大的 AdobeRGB 色彩空间，覆盖率也高达 97%。
在室外，屏幕的半亚光/亮光特性会导致一些微弱的反光。高对比度和良好的亮度有助于保持屏幕在明亮环境中的可用性。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.68 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.98 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.19 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.59 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 363 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 363 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 363 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
与大多数 OLED 屏幕一样，联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 的屏幕也使用脉宽调制技术来调节屏幕亮度。除了最低亮度级别（仅为 90 Hz）外，所有亮度级别的频率均为 360 Hz，因此对 PWM 敏感的用户一定要避免使用这款屏幕。
性能：X1 Carbon G11 中的 i7-1370P 失效
联想在 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 中总共提供了七颗 CPU，全部来自英特尔，这也是 ThinkPad X1 系列的一贯特色。可选处理器包括 英特尔酷睿 i5-1335U和 i5-1345U和 i7-1355U处理器 i7-1365U，以及 i5-1340P，以及 i7-1360P以及 i7-1370P.除 i7-1370P 外，P28-CPU 不面向普通客户，仅限于大公司客户。
GPU 的选择取决于 CPU。i7 CPU 的 Iris Xe 性能更强，有 96 个执行单元（EU），而 i5 CPU 的 iGPU 性能较弱，只有 80 个执行单元（EU）。内存始终采用板载焊接，联想根据型号提供 16、32 或 64 GB LPDDR5-6000/LPDDR5X-6400 内存。64 GB 内存是配备 i7-1370P 的配置所独有的，比如我们正在评测的这款。与内存不同的是，存储空间没有焊接，因为出厂时有一个容量高达 2 TB 的 M.2 2280 SSD。
测试条件
联想使用 Windows 设置应用程序而不是专有解决方案来设置能源配置文件。在这种情况下，有三个配置文件可以调节 CPU 的功率限制，从而调节系统的功耗以及风扇噪音和发热量。功耗限制 1 (PL1) 是指持续负载下的功耗，而功耗限制 2 则是指短期提升性能：
- 最佳电池寿命：PL1 10 W / PL2 10 W
- 平衡：PL1 13 W / PL2 65 W
- 最佳性能：PL1 15 瓦 / PL2 65 瓦
处理器
英特尔 英特尔酷睿 i7-1370P它是猛禽湖 P28 CPU 中的佼佼者。它有 6 个大的 P 核心和 8 个小的 E 核心，这意味着它总共有 14 个物理核心，比任何其他 P28 或 U15 CPU 都要多。该处理器采用超线程技术，拥有 20 个线程，时钟频率从 1.9 GHz（P 内核）/1.4 GHz（E 内核）到 5.2 GHz（P 内核）/3.9 GHz（E 内核）不等。有关与其他处理器的详细比较，请参阅我们的 CPU 比较列表.
很快，我们就发现这款处理器对于联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 来说已经力不从心。在高达 65 W 的 PL2 下，峰值多核性能非常出色，与 惠普 EliteBook 845 G10的 AMD Ryzen 9 Pro 7940HS和 AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 7840U.在持续多核负载下，该版本的联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 甚至比采用 i7-1365U 的 X1 Carbon 更慢。 i7-1365U的速度还要慢。甚至单核性能也没有那么好--购买该机型时不应期望获得出色的 CPU 性能。
当设备使用电池供电时，CPU 性能不会节流。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 -1! | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (12778 - 14741, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (1750 - 1995, n=3) | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (5079 - 5651, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (675 - 764, n=3) | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (2052 - 2492, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (258 - 284, n=3) | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (246 - 389, n=3) | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (48229 - 55049, n=3) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (6140 - 6687, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (10184 - 11832, n=4) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (1655 - 1974, n=4) | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (9.65 - 15.5, n=3) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (39.6 - 45.2, n=3) | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 5Z4X0ES | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (0.4244 - 0.4649, n=3) | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1141 - 32888, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (5618 - 11995, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6838 - 123315, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (31165 - 60283, n=3) | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (1439 - 2799, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (100027 - 104796, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11579 - 115682, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (7906 - 8733, n=3) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (3366 - 65433, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (28284 - 32966, n=3) | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (32334 - 107331, n=3) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (166.9 - 1379, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (406 - 818, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (2964 - 6372, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 53954, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (27048 - 39240, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
系统性能
这款产品是我们测试过的第一款配备 64GB 内存的联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon，是高移动性虚拟机工作主力的理想选择。在正常使用情况下，这意味着内存永远不会不足，因此用户可以随心所欲地打开多个浏览器标签页。
在系统性能基准测试中，联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 表现出色，在 Crossmark 中遥遥领先。在日常使用中，系统非常流畅。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5466 - 6418, n=2) | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10693 - 11807, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (7320 - 7792, n=2) | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5662 - 7799, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1728 - 1827, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1675 - 1722, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1875 - 2068, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1484 - 1504, n=2) | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5466 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (14916 - 108756, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (46184 - 69471, n=3) | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (50228 - 66704, n=3) | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (16513 - 112837, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (47356 - 85119, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7.4 - 187.8, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1370P (72.5 - 94.6, n=3) | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
LatencyMon 测试中的高数据意味着这款设备在实时编辑音频和视频时可能会出现问题。在 Youtube 测试中，我们还看到了一些掉帧现象。联想可以通过更新驱动程序来解决这个问题。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
联想ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11的存储容量在联想销售的产品中是最大的，因为它配备了2 TB固态硬盘。该固态硬盘由西部数据公司生产，在我们的基准测试中表现出色，但需要注意的是，它的性能在持续负载下会出现波动。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
由于这里使用的是最强大的 P28 CPU，或者至少是纸面上最强大的 CPU，因此本评测设备自然使用了速度更快的变体 Iris Xe（96 欧.有充足的内存支持 GPU，而且是在四通道模式下运行的快速 LPDDR5X 内存。不过，图形处理器的性能还是略微令人失望，iGPU 的速度并不比对比中的其他英特尔 iGPU 快。AMD iGPU 要好得多。不过，对于基本任务和老游戏来说，这款 GPU 的速度还是足够快的。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 6648 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 17036 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4073 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1571 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8.5 - 43.7, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA | |
| Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 | |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 74.1 | 63.4 | 18.3 | 7.81 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 52.8 | 47.8 | 27.2 | 12.1 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 80.7 | 55.5 | 40.8 | 43.7 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 34.6 | 21 | 15.8 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 25.9 | 28.9 | 26.3 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 65.6 | 29.4 | 25.1 | 22.1 |
| F1 23 (2023) | 32.6 | 30.1 | 21.7 | 15.9 |
排放：温度比以前更低
系统噪音
出乎意料的是，这个版本的联想ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11的风扇噪音比另一款搭载了 酷睿 i7-1365U.这可能是由于联想在我们首次评测后更新了固件。与惠普 EliteBook 845 G10 和戴尔Latitude 9440 相比，X1 Carbon Gen 11 的风扇噪音不相上下，甚至略低。最高噪音为 41 dB(a)，虽然明显，但还不至于造成干扰。
我们没有检测到任何线圈啸叫。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 23.3 / 23.3 / 23.3 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 35.9 / 40.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.3 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1370P, WDC PC SN810 2TB | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, WDC PC SN810 1TB | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZAL41T0HBLB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -8% | 1% | -6% | -5% | |
| off / environment * | 23.3 | 24.8 -6% | 22.8 2% | 25.3 -9% | 24.1 -3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 23.3 | 24.8 -6% | 22.8 2% | 25.3 -9% | 24.3 -4% |
| Idle Average * | 23.3 | 24.8 -6% | 22.8 2% | 25.3 -9% | 24.3 -4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 23.3 | 28.5 -22% | 24.6 -6% | 25.3 -9% | 24.3 -4% |
| Load Average * | 35.9 | 39.6 -10% | 38.2 -6% | 34.4 4% | 36.3 -1% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 41 | 42.7 -4% | 38.1 7% | 43.4 -6% | 44.5 -9% |
| Load Maximum * | 40.9 | 42.7 -4% | 38.2 7% | 43.4 -6% | 44.5 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
即使在最佳性能模式下，联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 11 也有相对较低的功率限制 1，因此它不会变得非常热也就不足为奇了。我们在压力测试中检测到的最高温度为 43.8 摄氏度/111 华氏度，热量主要集中在机身左上角。重要的掌托区域在运行过程中始终保持凉爽。
在 CPU + GPU 压力测试中，CPU 会略有节流，CPU 功耗降至 13.5 W。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+1.3 °C / 2.3 F).
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 Intel Core i7-1370P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 10% | -7% | 3% | 5% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 42.2 | 44.4 -5% | 50 -18% | 45.6 -8% | 40.8 3% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 43.8 | 45.3 -3% | 49.7 -13% | 51.9 -18% | 40 9% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 32 | 24.9 22% | 32.4 -1% | 26.5 17% | 30.4 5% |
| Idle Bottom * | 33.7 | 25.7 24% | 32.3 4% | 27 20% | 32.8 3% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
毫无疑问，联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 拥有 ThinkPad 中最好的扬声器系统之一，它有两个向上发射的高音扬声器和两个向下发射的低音扬声器。这套四扬声器系统发出的声音响亮、饱满，甚至还能提供一些底音，令人愉悦。不过总的来说 戴尔Latitude 9440的扬声器配置略胜一筹。不过，ThinkPad X1 Carbon 绝对可以满足听音乐的需求。
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量：OLED 屏幕消耗电池电量快
除了待机或关机状态，联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 11 的功耗从未低于 7 W。 配备 IPS 屏幕的 X1 Carbon G11 首批评测样品我们测试的 X1 Carbon G11
ThinkPad X1 Carbon 的最大功耗超过了这一数值，达到了 66 W，但这只是峰值功耗，很快就会下降。用户不必担心设备在使用过程中电池会放电。
| Off / Standby | 0.4 / 0.7 Watt |
| Idle | 7 / 7.9 / 8.1 Watt |
| Load |
40.5 / 66 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00 i7-1370P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN810 2TB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP EliteBook 845 G10 818N0EA R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZAL41T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 17% | -2% | -21% | 3% | -6% | 0% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 7 | 3.9 44% | 6.4 9% | 4.3 39% | 4.2 40% | 5.34 ? 24% | 4.49 ? 36% |
| Idle Average * | 7.9 | 6.3 20% | 7.4 6% | 10.1 -28% | 6.9 13% | 8.55 ? -8% | 7.66 ? 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.1 | 6.9 15% | 8.3 -2% | 11.2 -38% | 7.8 4% | 10.8 ? -33% | 9.56 ? -18% |
| Load Average * | 40.5 | 41.8 -3% | 56.5 -40% | 64.4 -59% | 46 -14% | 45.3 ? -12% | 46.6 ? -15% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 43 | 33.2 23% | 37.5 13% | 59.4 -38% | 51.9 -21% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 66 | 63.4 4% | 62.5 5% | 66.7 -1% | 68.2 -3% | 67.5 ? -2% | 68.6 ? -4% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
不出所料，联想从 57 Wh 电池中挤出的电池续航时间并不长。这款设备的效率实在太低，这是 OLED 屏幕和 i7-1370P CPU 的功劳。尽管如此，我们还是可以注意到它的进步，因为在 WiFi 测试（150 cd/m²）中 6.5 小时的电池续航时间与同样配备 OLED 屏幕的前代产品相比仍有明显进步 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 10 代 30 周年纪念版.希望最大限度延长电池使用时间的用户一定要在浏览器中启用强制黑暗模式，因为在启用黑暗模式的 WiFi 测试（最大亮度）中，电池使用时间比普通测试延长了两个小时。
Pros
Cons
结论：64 GB 内存是 X1 Carbon 的强项，i7-1370P 则不然
联想旗舰产品 ThinkPad 的这一版本，即最高配置的 X1 Carbon G11，是一款非常奇特的设备。它有几个关键的卖点，对于需要这些功能的人来说是一个非常强大的选择。与此同时，它在其他一些方面无疑也是一款有缺陷、不平衡的产品。
先说优点：X1 Carbon 拥有非常轻巧紧凑的机身、舒适的输入设备、丰富的安全和连接选项，再加上 5G、高质量 OLED 面板和 64 GB 内存等附加功能，这一切无疑都有其可取之处。特别是如果将大容量内存与低重量结合起来，联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 11 的这一配置在市场上是独一无二的，因为许多超移动笔记本电脑仍然局限于 32 GB 这样的低容量内存。对于某些内存较大的工作负载，这款机型是一个不错的选择。
它的不足之处在于处理器：64 GB 内存捆绑了酷睿 i7-1370P，但对于这款纤薄的笔记本电脑来说，这款处理器的散热能力实在是太强了。此外，联想还通过固件更新降低了风扇转速和功率限制--幸好这降低了之前过高的机箱温度--这样一来，在持续负载情况下，这款笔记本的性能就真的不尽如人意了。对于长时间的渲染任务，这款机型并不适合。遗憾的是，如果你想要 64GB 内存，就必须购买这款 CPU。
OLED 屏幕的情况也是如此，它的屏幕质量确实很好，但却大大降低了电池续航时间。至少在这种情况下，还有其他屏幕可供选择，因此，如果你购买这款配备低功耗 IPS 屏幕而不是 OLED 面板的机型，你就可以获得良好的电池寿命和 64GB 内存的组合。
低重量和 64GB 内存是联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 11 的绝佳功能组合--不过，CPU 的乏力使这款设备不适合 CPU 较重的工作负载。
如果你想要 64GB 内存，也可以购买 HP EliteBook 845 G10.虽然这款设备拥有两个内存插槽，CPU 性能要好得多，但其低重量完全无法与 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 相提并论。戴尔 戴尔Latitude 9440戴尔 X1 Carbon 的键盘也不如惠普或联想的商务笔记本电脑。不过，它提供了可转换功能，而其他两款设备都不具备这种功能。
价格和供应情况
测试机型是德国联想教育计划的特殊配置。它只面向学生和教师，售价 2750 欧元。如果配置与该机型一致，联想ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11在联想美国商店的售价约为2550美元。亚马逊提供的 32 GB 内存的类似配置价格为 2500 美元。
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11 21HNS54T00
- 11/06/2023 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
