联想ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11评测--停滞不前的昂贵商务旗舰机
多年来,ThinkPad X1 Carbon一直是联想的旗舰商务笔记本电脑。它的客户期待着良好的输入设备、超薄的移动设计、最新的组件、长的电池寿命,当然还有一个可靠的日常伴侣。在此期间,我们现在已经到了第11代。因此,我们想知道这些对目前的ThinkPad X1 Carbon提出的要求是否公平,或者它是否停留在以前的成功上。
我们评测的是21HNS00000型号,配备了 酷睿i7-1365U32GB内存、1TB固态硬盘以及低功率的全高清IPS显示屏。在联想的网上商店里,有可能把类似的配置(没有LTE)放在一起,但价格相对昂贵,约为2135美元。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.9 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 15.36 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
90.2 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2022 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 15.36 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
88.7 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2022 | HP EliteBook 840 G9 i7-1280P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 19 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
84.3 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Dynabook Portégé X40-K i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
89.6 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.20" | 3120x2080 | |
89 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M | 1.5 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.50" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例与特点
联想采用了去年的黑色外壳,没有改变。 去年的型号.盖子上的碳纤维和强化塑料以及底座上的镁铝合金的结合,确保了箱子的稳定性,其制造质量也无可挑剔。光滑的表面也感觉很好,但必须定期清洁,因为使用过的地方在一段时间后会开始出现一些斑点,这也是我们在前代产品中遇到的问题。我们还将新的G11与我们的私人G7进行了比较,由于采用了16:10的长宽比面板,新机型略微薄了一些,但也更深了一些。就基本单元的厚度而言,没有变化。X1 Carbon G11的重量略低于1.2公斤,一般来说仍然可以移动,在手提行李中不占空间。
说到端口,仍然有很好的选择,包括Thunderbolt 4,但是,又一次没有SD读卡器。我们的评测设备配备了一个LTE模块,包括一个纳米SIM卡插槽,甚至可以选择升级为5G模块。来自英特尔的Wi-Fi模块(AX211)符合当前标准,在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,传输速率非常好。
网络摄像头以全高清分辨率记录图像,在良好的照明条件下,其质量是不错的。此外,软聚焦、虚拟背景或眼球追踪等功能已经内置,可以在常规的Windows相机应用中找到。然而,1080p的摄像头和麦克风的规格是否应该刻在盖子的前面,这是值得怀疑的。
Networking | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
输入设备 - X1 Carbon仍然具有1.5毫米的键程
在输入设备方面没有任何变化。虽然联想已经将ThinkPad型号的一些键程减少到1.35毫米,但X1 Carbon有1.5毫米,总体而言,我们面对的是一个非常好的键盘,尽管从质量上看,它没有达到早期型号的高度。 除此之外,与惠普等公司的高端商务笔记本电脑相比,不再有任何优势。同样,玻璃触摸板工作得很好,并提供坚实、高质量的点击声。Trackpoint的专用按键质量较差,点击声音也稍大一些。
显示屏 - 低功耗的IPS面板
1920 x 1080像素,哑光IPS面板是我们几年来一直熟悉的面板。低功耗面板是基本的显示屏,也有带触摸屏的可选版本,ePrivacy屏幕以及OLED面板。然而,我们不能推荐后两个选项,因为OLED显示屏有PWM闪烁的问题,而且电池寿命受到很大影响。关于ePrivacy模型,即使在正常操作中,可视角度也相当有限。
基本上,这款低功耗显示器的规格还不错,但考虑到现在是2023年,联想在某些方面还有改进的空间。例如,增加亮度和刷新率。死主观的图像质量仍然很好,明亮的地方不会出现颗粒感。对于联想来说,这是一个有点像显示面板的彩票,目前设备中的友达光电面板在亮度方面有点下降,平均亮度为380cd/m²。再加上缓慢的响应时间,(有一个明显的重影效果),该面板在竞争设备中远远落后。然而,0.21cd/m²的黑色水平非常低,导致最大对比度超过1800:1.该显示器没有受到PWM的影响,屏幕出血现象基本没有。
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 381 cd/m²
Contrast: 1805:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.7
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
77.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
75.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 B140UAN02.1, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U R140NW4D R0, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | HP EliteBook 840 G9 Chi Mei CMN1435, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Dynabook Portégé X40-K Chi Mei N140HCA-EAC, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 TMX1422, IPS, 3120x2080, 14.2" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 LEN145WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.5" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE ATNA40YK01-1, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -6% | -7% | -40% | 9% | -3% | 19% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 75.4 | 68.7 -9% | 67.6 -10% | 43.4 -42% | 89.8 19% | 71.8 -5% | 99.7 32% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.6 | 99.5 0% | 98.7 -1% | 64.6 -35% | 99.4 0% | 99.2 0% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 77.3 | 70.2 -9% | 69.7 -10% | 44.9 -42% | 84.2 9% | 73.1 -5% | 96.5 25% |
Response Times | 6% | -6% | 50% | 77% | 36% | 97% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 64.4 ? | 55.2 ? 14% | 66 ? -2% | 33.6 ? 48% | 20 ? 69% | 43.2 ? 33% | 1.2 ? 98% |
Response Time Black / White * | 42.5 ? | 43.2 ? -2% | 46.4 ? -9% | 20.4 ? 52% | 7 ? 84% | 25.9 ? 39% | 1.6 ? 96% |
PWM Frequency | 156000 ? | 342 ? | |||||
Screen | 19% | 17% | -63% | 24% | -11% | 16% | |
Brightness middle | 379 | 421.9 11% | 391.3 3% | 246.4 -35% | 595 57% | 386 2% | 400 6% |
Brightness | 383 | 420 10% | 368 -4% | 237 -38% | 550 44% | 366 -4% | 401 5% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 87 -4% | 86 -5% | 88 -3% | 85 -7% | 91 0% | 97 7% |
Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.29 -38% | 0.32 -52% | 0.41 -95% | 0.25 -19% | 0.26 -24% | |
Contrast | 1805 | 1455 -19% | 1223 -32% | 601 -67% | 2380 32% | 1485 -18% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 1.69 47% | 1.49 53% | 6 -88% | 2.01 37% | 3.8 -19% | 2.2 31% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.3 | 3.55 51% | 3.29 55% | 21.16 -190% | 6.9 5% | 9.1 -25% | 4.3 41% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.7 | 0.5 71% | 0.44 74% | 1.86 -9% | 1.22 28% | 1.2 29% | 2.6 -53% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 2.8 38% | 1.7 62% | 6.4 -42% | 2.74 39% | 6.2 -38% | 1.2 73% |
Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.13 103% | 2.12 104% | 2.01 109% | 2.4 92% | 2.09 105% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 6249 104% | 6442 101% | 6488 100% | 6738 96% | 6319 103% | 6618 98% | 6364 102% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 6% /
12% | 1% /
9% | -18% /
-42% | 37% /
28% | 7% /
-3% | 44% /
30% |
* ... smaller is better
我们用专业的CalMAN软件(X-Rite i1 Pro2)对面板进行了测量,开箱后,图像有点太暖,而且还存在黄色色调的问题。对于一台商务笔记本电脑来说,这些数值是可以接受的。通过我们自己的校准,我们能够改善图像(配置文件可以在上面免费下载),只有100%的红色仍然是一个异常值。该面板涵盖了小型sRGB色彩空间,对于其预期用途来说是足够的。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
42.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24.7 ms rise | |
↘ 17.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
64.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 30.7 ms rise | |
↘ 33.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
在户外,通常可以找到一个合适的位置,但在阳光直射下,哑光面板如果能再亮一点就更好了。
性能--ThinkPad配备了Raptor Lake U
联想再次提供U系列和P系列处理器,然而,正如我们去年发现的那样,P系列CPU由于冷却效果差,并不值得购买。内存是焊接的,不能扩展。
测试条件
一段时间以来,联想已经将额外的Vantage软件电源模式与Windows电源设置联系起来。出于这个原因,下面的基准和测量是使用最佳性能 模式进行的。
处理器 - 酷睿i7-1365U
猛禽湖一代英特尔酷睿i7-1365U提供了两个最高5.2GHz的快速性能核心和八个最高3.9GHz的效率核心,据此,该芯片可以同时处理最多12个线程。在一天结束的时候,我们面对的是旧的 酷睿i7-1265U在一个稍高的时钟速率。作为U系列芯片,标称的TDP为15瓦,但是,在短时间内,X1 Carbon内的i7可以消耗高达55瓦的功率,冷却系统只能处理大约一秒钟。在每一种情况下,在连续负载下,我们观察到功耗在12至34瓦之间波动,这意味着新机型只比其G10的前辈.AMD处理器在高端商务笔记本电脑中很难见到,尤其是在多核性能方面,Ryzen CPU有明显的优势。由于这个原因,不值得从去年的型号升级,也因为猛禽湖P芯片的冷却效果不好。在电池模式下,CPU的性能略有下降(~8 %),更多的CPU基准测试可以在这里找到 这里.
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K -2! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
Average of class Office |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Average of class Office (1577 - 15743, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (7532 - 9576, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (1877 - 1891, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Office (618 - 1995, n=97, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Average of class Office (590 - 5980, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (2902 - 3669, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (703 - 741, n=4) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Office (229 - 764, n=97, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Average of class Office (246 - 2642, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (1348 - 1604, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (261 - 268, n=4) | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Office (208 - 2248, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (373 - 430, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (33476 - 40424, n=4) | |
Average of class Office (7532 - 65460, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (5722 - 5941, n=4) | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Average of class Office (2972 - 6687, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (8272 - 8778, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Average of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=98, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (1841 - 1938, n=4) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
Average of class Office (510 - 1989, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
Average of class Office (1.55 - 18.7, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (8.61 - 10.3, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average of class Office (31.3 - 129.6, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (42.2 - 47.5, n=4) | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.192, n=96, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (0.4504 - 0.4586, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Average of class Office | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Office (763 - 24250, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (6720 - 8270, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Office (4113 - 102228, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (33777 - 41487, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
Average of class Office (287 - 4551, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (1754 - 2216, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (67557 - 69991, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Average of class Office (404 - 14288, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (4589 - 5145, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Average of class Office (2075 - 54365, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (16808 - 20668, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Average of class Office (7860 - 155900, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (34968 - 41413, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (519 - 650, n=4) | |
Average of class Office (78 - 1018, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Office (432 - 12755, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (3513 - 4367, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (37846 - 43780, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Average of class Office (4814 - 54971, n=98, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K |
系统性能
系统性能处于非常高的水平,我们的主观性能印象非常好,但几乎所有现代笔记本电脑中的固态硬盘都是这种情况。我们在测试期间没有遇到任何问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5690 - 5980, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Office (2463 - 7344, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10635 - 11827, n=4) | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=90, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (7206 - 7708, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6392 - 6735, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
Average of class Office (1912 - 9773, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1605 - 1675, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=90, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1582 - 1650, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=90, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1713 - 1797, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Office (340 - 1982, n=90, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1373 - 1427, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 |
PCMark 10 Score | 5697 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (57654 - 69736, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (49203 - 54068, n=4) | |
Average of class Office (7325 - 112436, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (70434 - 85570, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Office (8.3 - 185.2, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1365U (90.2 - 102.2, n=4) | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
在目前的BIOS版本下,评测设备在我们的标准化延迟(上网、4K YouTube播放、CPU负载)中显示了限制。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储
联想为ThinkPad X1 Carbon配备了PCIe 4.0固态硬盘--在我们的案例中是WD SN810的1TB版本。第一次启动后,用户有902GB可供支配。传输速率很好,但在持续的负载下无法保持这种高水平。然而,在日常办公中,这并不重要。其他固态硬盘的基准测试可在 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
显卡是我们熟悉的 英特尔的Xe Graphics G7,它已经运行了一段时间了。这对于日常办公任务来说,当然是足够的动力。此外,高分辨率视频的播放也没有出现任何问题。然而,性能并不稳定,该设备未能通过3DMarkTime Spy 压力测试(75.8 %)。在我们的Witcher 3 循环中,我们还观察到明显的波动,这进一步降低了iGPU已经有限的游戏能力。
在电池模式下,性能又降低了10%左右。其他GPU基准测试可以在这里.
3DMark 11 Performance | 6746 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4810 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1662 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | |
Average of class Office (298 - 1215, n=16, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Average of class Office (343 - 3964, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (336 - 1259, n=101) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Average of class Office (2.66 - 34, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Office (3.35 - 47.8, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 | |
Dynabook Portégé X40-K |
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 83.2 | 74.2 | 20.1 | 9.03 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 73 | 47 | 25 | 12.1 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 36.8 | 36.3 | 35.5 | 34.8 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 40.6 | 21.8 | 21.8 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 40.7 | 33.8 | 30.6 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 85.5 | 33.7 | 27.5 | 22.2 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 89.2 | 42.3 | 34.2 | 22.8 |
F1 22 (2022) | 38 | 34.3 | 25.2 |
排放和能源
噪声排放
在风扇方面,处理器的高功率限制使自己出名,因为两个小风扇在负载下都有很多事情要做。在最高42.7 dB(A)的情况下,它们对于这个性能级别来说也变得太吵了。你必须在这里进行批评,并提出一个问题:为什么U系列处理器运行时有如此高的功率限制。我们无法检测到额外的电子噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.8 / 24.8 / 28.5 dB(A) |
Load |
| 39.6 / 42.7 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.8 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, WDC PC SN810 1TB | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1265U, Kioxia BG5 KBG5AZNV1T02 | HP EliteBook 840 G9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1280P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF | Dynabook Portégé X40-K Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 Radeon 680M, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 9% | 5% | 14% | -2% | 6% | 9% | |
off / environment * | 24.8 | 23.2 6% | 24.3 2% | 22.8 8% | 25.4 -2% | 24.2 2% | 22.8 8% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.8 | 23.2 6% | 24.5 1% | 23.4 6% | 25.4 -2% | 24.2 2% | 22.8 8% |
Idle Average * | 24.8 | 23.2 6% | 24.5 1% | 23.4 6% | 25.4 -2% | 24.2 2% | 22.8 8% |
Idle Maximum * | 28.5 | 23.2 19% | 26 9% | 23.4 18% | 29.6 -4% | 24.2 15% | 24.6 14% |
Load Average * | 39.6 | 38.6 3% | 32.3 18% | 31.2 21% | 42 -6% | 36.2 9% | 38.2 4% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.7 | 38.5 10% | 39 9% | 27.1 37% | 42.7 -0% | 38.1 11% | |
Load Maximum * | 42.7 | 38.3 10% | 44.7 -5% | 40.5 5% | 40.9 4% | 36.2 15% | 38.2 11% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在执行简单任务时没有任何问题,但是一旦处理器被置于较重的负载之下,基本单元的左上角就会很快发热。在设备的这一区域,我们测量到高达45℃,考虑到风扇的噪音和低性能,这简直是太多了。出于这个原因,联想应该对该机型的冷却系统进行全面检查。
在压力测试中,我们经历了与CPU负载相同的行为。CPU短暂地达到了55瓦,然后开始在12到34瓦之间变化,并在测试的剩余时间里保持在那里。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.4 °C / 84.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-1.7 °C / -3 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U Intel Core i7-1265U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP EliteBook 840 G9 Intel Core i7-1280P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Dynabook Portégé X40-K Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 8% | 18% | 16% | -18% | 2% | -20% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 44.4 | 41.2 7% | 32.8 26% | 31.6 29% | 46.5 -5% | 39.2 12% | 50 -13% |
Maximum Bottom * | 45.3 | 41 9% | 36.6 19% | 32.8 28% | 44.7 1% | 49.8 -10% | 49.7 -10% |
Idle Upper Side * | 24.9 | 23.2 7% | 21.6 13% | 24 4% | 34.9 -40% | 24.2 3% | 32.4 -30% |
Idle Bottom * | 25.7 | 23.4 9% | 22.2 14% | 24.8 4% | 32.9 -28% | 25.1 2% | 32.3 -26% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
扬声器仍然非常好,特别是对于一个商务设备来说。在这一领域,X1 Carbon不应该觉得有必要隐藏,甚至可以从次笔记本如华为Matebook X Pro.当涉及到低音时,你的期望应该被控制住,但尽管如此,其质量足以满足视频会议通话等要求。
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
消耗功率
总的来说,功耗非常不明显,设备在空闲使用时也非常高效。在压力测试中,我们简短地测量了~64瓦,消耗量迅速稳定在20到45瓦之间,跟随我们在测试中也观察到的波动。总而言之,这个紧凑的65瓦电源适配器(313克)尺寸很好。
Off / Standby | 0.44 / 0.74 Watt |
Idle | 3.9 / 6.3 / 6.9 Watt |
Load |
41.8 / 63.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
说到X1 Carbon的电池寿命,它的低功耗显示屏有助于展示其最好的一面。在150cd/m²(代表显示屏最大亮度的78%)下,我们在视频和Wi-Fi测试中都记录了约14小时的运行时间。即使在全亮度下,Wi-Fi测试仍然运行了约10个小时,而在负载下,该设备在一个半小时后就放弃了。作为一个比较:去年的OLED型号在我们的Wi-Fi测试中只运行了5小时--整整少了9小时。在笔记本电脑打开的情况下,完全充电需要113分钟;但在大约39分钟后,用户可以获得60%的电池。
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh | HP EliteBook 840 G9 i7-1280P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 51 Wh | Dynabook Portégé X40-K i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 53 Wh | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M, 73 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CB00DCGE i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -53% | -46% | -34% | -7% | 0% | -64% | -2% | |
H.264 | 848 | 527 -38% | 903 6% | 704 ? -17% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 839 | 393 -53% | 457 -46% | 554 -34% | 580 -31% | 783 -7% | 300 -64% | 595 ? -29% |
Load | 84 | 124 48% | 86 2% | 117.5 ? 40% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - X1 Carbon有性能问题
G11一代的ThinkPad X1 Carbon是一个相当小的更新,配备了Raptor Lake处理器,现在可以选择安装5G模块。该设备的其他部分保持不变,包括显示屏选项。标准的、内置的、较低功率的显示屏仍然是一个很好的选择,但我们希望看到这款商务笔记本电脑得到一个升级。例如,具有更好的亮度、体面的响应时间和更高刷新率的优质IPS面板。在我们看来,OLED选项(我们在G10型号中审查过)不是一个好的选择,尽管图像质量很好(PWM闪烁,电池寿命大大降低),而且ePrivacy屏幕也存在视角严重受限的问题(即使关闭了集成隐私过滤器)。
然而,我们感到惊讶的是,联想没有设法掌握电源传输,其他方面没有多少新的东西。值得提出的关键问题是,考虑到有限的冷却性能,为什么功率限制设置得这么高。在简短的基准测试中,性能很好,但用户不太可能感觉到好处,特别是当性能迅速下降和风扇变得非常响亮时。
ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11有性能问题,总之,Raptor Lake芯片并没有提供任何值得注意的改进。更新是应该的,尤其是在涉及到基本的显示屏时。然而,X1 Carbon也有许多积极的方面,如坚实的外壳、广泛的功能和很长的电池寿命。
X1 Carbon仍然具有许多优势,首先是坚固的外壳、出色的端口选择(可选5G模块)、良好的键盘(尽管它曾经更好)、熟练的扬声器以及与低功耗显示屏搭配的持久电池。然而,2135美元的价格(无LTE),很难说是一个便宜货,在这个价格上,你不应该要处理性能问题。
价格和可用性
与我们的评测设备类似的型号(无LTE)可从联想的网上商店购买,价格约为2135美元。
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G11-21HNS00000
- 06/22/2023 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.