Notebookcheck Logo

惠普Victus 16回顾。配备AMD CPU和Nvidia GPU的经济实惠的游戏笔记本电脑

对于小气鬼来说。

在最实惠的Victus 16版本中,惠普将Ryzen 5 5600H与GeForce RTX 3050 Ti结合在一起,这保证了144-Hz FHD显示屏的充足性能。如果不是因为平庸的图像质量......
AMD Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen)
HP Victus 16

在我们已经测试了一个更昂贵的Victus 16版本,配备了一个Ryzen 7 5800HGeForce RTX 3060几个月前,我们现在把实惠的Victus 16-0145ng模型进行测试。尽管惠普通过不包括Windows操作系统来削减成本(我们安装了Windows 11 Home),但一个 Ryzen 5 5600H和一个 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti约为920欧元(975美元),仍然令人印象深刻。同样,以这个价格包括16GB的DDR4-RAM和512-GB的NVMe SSD也没有理由抱怨。至少在纸面上,IPS显示屏也是一个很好的数字,因为144赫兹表明充分再现了快速游戏的效果。

HP Victus 16-e0145ng (Victus 16 Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H 6 x 3.3 - 4.2 GHz, Cezanne-H (Zen 3)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1485 MHz, RAM: 1500 MHz, 75 W TDP, GDDR6, ForceWare 511.79, Switchable Graphics
Memory
16 GB 
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-3200, two slots (both in use)
Display
16.10 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 137 PPI, CMN1609, IPS, Full-HD, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, 512 GB 
, M.2 NVMe
Soundcard
Realtek ALC245 @ AMD K19.5 - Audio Processor - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: combined audio port (headset/mic), Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC
Networking
Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 23.5 x 370 x 260
Battery
70 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4 cells
Operating System
FreeDos
Camera
Webcam: HD
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0 B&O, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 200 W power supply, Omen Gaming Hub, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.4 kg, Power Supply: 476 g
Price
919 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

由于除了一些小细节外,这款机箱与我们之前测试的型号完全相同,所以我们不会在这里进一步讨论机箱、设备(连接等)和输入设备。你可以在 "Victus 16-e0179ng "的评论中找到相应的信息。 Victus 16-e0179ng.

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
82.3 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2022
HP Victus 16-e0145ng
R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2.4 kg23.5 mm16.10"1920x1080
84.3 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg23.5 mm16.10"1920x1080
79.7 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2022
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE
i5-11300H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2 kg24.2 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.7 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
Dell G15 5515
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2.4 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.4 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2021
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2.5 kg24.6 mm17.30"1920x1080

这款16英寸笔记本的竞争对手包括其他经济实惠的游戏笔记本,配备了GeForce RTX 3050 Ti,如 联想Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU,以及戴尔G15 5515,以及 华硕Strix G17 G713QE.这些笔记本电脑作为对比设备出现在图表中--只要它们的数值可用。

HP Victus 16
HP Victus 16
HP Victus 16
HP Victus 16
HP Victus 16
HP Victus 16

尺寸比较

395 mm 282 mm 24.6 mm 2.5 kg370 mm 260 mm 23.5 mm 2.4 kg370 mm 260 mm 23.5 mm 2.5 kg359.6 mm 251.9 mm 24.2 mm 2 kg357.26 mm 272.11 mm 24.9 mm 2.4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

SD卡阅读器

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 197.3, n=78, last 2 years)
91 MB/s +40%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
75 MB/s +15%
HP Victus 16-e0145ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
65 MB/s

沟通

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=137, last 2 years)
1217 MBit/s +43%
HP Victus 16-e0145ng
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
851 (654min - 925max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1744, n=137, last 2 years)
1388 MBit/s +76%
HP Victus 16-e0145ng
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
787 (643min - 888max) MBit/s
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
HP Victus 16-e0145ng; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø786 (643-888)
HP Victus 16-e0145ng; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø851 (654-925)

网络摄像头

ColorChecker
6.7 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
15 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
3 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
10 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
11 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
9 ∆E
ColorChecker HP Victus 16-e0145ng: 8.47 ∆E min: 1.84 - max: 15.02 ∆E

显示

虽然更昂贵的兄弟姐妹配备了良好的全高清显示屏,但不幸的是,制造商的一些成本削减措施在Victus 16-e0145ng上明显可见。

245
cd/m²
257
cd/m²
238
cd/m²
231
cd/m²
257
cd/m²
233
cd/m²
225
cd/m²
233
cd/m²
233
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
CMN1609 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 257 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 239.1 cd/m² Minimum: 17 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 257 cd/m²
Contrast: 1028:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.91 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89, calibrated: 3.61
ΔE Greyscale 7.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
43% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.125
HP Victus 16-e0145ng
CMN1609, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1"
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
BOE09BE, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1"
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE
LEN156FHD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Dell G15 5515
BOE092A, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AU Optronics B173HAN04.9, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Display
69%
-4%
-7%
-3%
Display P3 Coverage
41.6
72.6
75%
39.7
-5%
39.1
-6%
40.2
-3%
sRGB Coverage
61.9
100
62%
59.6
-4%
56.9
-8%
60.3
-3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
43
73.5
71%
41.1
-4%
40.4
-6%
41.6
-3%
Response Times
47%
-69%
14%
5%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
29.6 ?(13.8, 15.8)
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
68%
46.4 ?(21.2, 25.2)
-57%
25.2 ?(12.4, 12.8)
15%
26.8 ?(14, 12.8)
9%
Response Time Black / White *
19.4 ?(9.7, 9.7)
14.4 ?(8.4, 6)
26%
35.2 ?(18.8, 16.4)
-81%
16.8 ?(9.2, 7.6)
13%
19.2 ?(10.8, 8.4)
1%
PWM Frequency
200 ?(99)
Screen
36%
13%
0%
27%
Brightness middle
257
361
40%
307
19%
278
8%
270.5
5%
Brightness
239
341
43%
292
22%
262
10%
269
13%
Brightness Distribution
88
88
0%
88
0%
83
-6%
92
5%
Black Level *
0.25
0.3
-20%
0.21
16%
0.36
-44%
0.19
24%
Contrast
1028
1203
17%
1462
42%
772
-25%
1424
39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.91
2.44
65%
5.9
15%
5.74
17%
4.39
36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
22.27
6.37
71%
21.6
3%
19.63
12%
20.8
7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
3.61
1.26
65%
4.8
-33%
4.7
-30%
1.56
57%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
7.5
4.6
39%
4.9
35%
3.1
59%
3.1
59%
Gamma
2.125 104%
2.268 97%
2.26 97%
2.011 109%
2.14 103%
CCT
6025 108%
6609 98%
6504 100%
6207 105%
6927 94%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
51% / 44%
-20% / -2%
2% / 1%
10% / 18%

* ... smaller is better

即使竞争对手在这方面也不是模范,提供类似的微不足道的结果,但在2022年,无论是亮度还是色彩空间的覆盖率都不再足够。只有62%的sRGB色彩空间和239cd/m²的平均亮度使得图像非常苍白和黑暗,特别是在明亮的环境下。

卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:饱和度
卡尔曼:饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN: 饱和度(已校准)
CalMAN: 饱和度(已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)

色彩准确度结果也同样令人失望。在交付状态下,该面板在绿色色调中挣扎,但至少你可以通过校准来缓解这种情况(像往常一样,你可以从上述亮度分布示意图右侧的链接中下载我们的ICC文件)。

惠普Victus 16与sRGB对比
惠普Victus 16与sRGB对比
惠普Victus 16 VS AdobeRGB
惠普Victus 16 VS AdobeRGB
HP Victus 16 vs P3
HP Victus 16 vs P3

响应时间的主题给了我们较少的抱怨理由。考虑到这个价格,将近19毫秒的黑色到白色和30毫秒的灰色到灰色是可以的。视角稳定性也是如此,其范围在IPS屏幕的典型水平上。

直射光
直射光
子像素网格
子像素网格
视角
视角

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
19.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.7 ms rise
↘ 9.7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.8 ms rise
↘ 15.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8615 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

业绩

在我们的测试设备中,Victus 16属于游戏的中端产品。所用的组件是平衡的,应该能吸引有价格意识的游戏者。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
 

测试条件

Omen游戏集线器应该预装在装有Windows的机型中,提供三种不同的性能配置。除了电池测试,所有的测量都是使用最高模式进行的(见截图#3)。风扇控制始终被调整为自动设置。

奥门游戏中心
奥门游戏中心
奥门游戏中心

处理器

Ryzen 5 5600H是一个六核处理器,指定功率为45瓦,能够同时在多达12个线程上运行。在负载下,这个7纳米模型的时钟速度为3.3至4.2GHz。

在我们的Cinebench循环中,性能发展非常均匀,与竞争对手类似。正如你在表中看到的,Ryzen 5600H明显快于英特尔的 酷睿i5-11300H,虽然它只包含4个核心(最大8个线程)。由于使用了Ryzen 7 5800H(8C/16T),其他竞争对手的速度略快。

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

01052103154205256307358409451050115512601365147015751680178518901995Tooltip
HP Victus 16-e0145ng AMD Ryzen 5 5600H: Ø1610 (1599.49-1621.21)
HP Victus 16-e0179ng AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1967 (1952.36-1982.46)
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE Intel Core i5-11300H: Ø954 (926.91-959.58)
Dell G15 5515 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1955 (1938.74-1967.83)
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2052 (2019.39-2059.31)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
89.2 pt
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 -2!
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
62.2 pt
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
60.5 pt
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
57.3 pt
HP Victus 16-e0145ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
54.9 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
 
53.9 pt
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE
Intel Core i5-11300H
42.1 pt

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1621 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
131.3 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
223 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3767 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
532 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1373 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
9724 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
98.4 pt
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
75.7 pt
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
73.4 pt
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
71.6 pt
HP Victus 16-e0145ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
55.9 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
 
55.9 pt
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE
Intel Core i5-11300H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
38.5 pt

系统性能

尽管配备了顶级的固态硬盘,但在我们的测试领域,它的系统性能只够排在倒数第二位。然而,PCMark 10的6076分仍然是一个很好的结果,表明它是一个有能力的全能型产品。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=151, last 2 years)
7828 Points +29%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
6567 Points +8%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
6493 Points +7%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
6098 Points 0%
HP Victus 16-e0145ng
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6076 Points
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-11300H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
5641 Points -7%
PCMark 10 Score
6076 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=164, last 2 years)
65857 MB/s +57%
HP Victus 16-e0145ng
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
41967 MB/s
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
41178 MB/s -2%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
38595 MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
38015 MB/s -9%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  (20549 - 42141, n=14)
37145 MB/s -11%
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE
Intel Core i5-11300H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
20834 MB/s -50%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

正如经常发生的那样,延迟方面有一些需要改进的地方。根据LatencyMon工具,Victus 16在没有任何进一步调整的情况下,并不理想地适合实时音频和视频处理。

延迟监测
延迟监测
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1161 μs * -30%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
1048 μs * -17%
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-11300H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
980 μs * -10%
HP Victus 16-e0145ng
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
892.8 μs *
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
648 μs * +27%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

我们的测试配置通过其存储解决方案收集了一些积极的观点。尽管三星PM981a的512GB存储容量并没有引起任何热情,但基于NVMe的M.2驱动器在基准测试中表现非常好,甚至将更昂贵的Victus 16型号的1-TB驱动器勉强甩在后面。

Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3567 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2948 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 500.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 373.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2600 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2855 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 45.64 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 139.5 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
95.2 pt
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
71.1 pt
HP Victus 16-e0145ng
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
70.5 pt
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
47.6 pt
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
45.8 pt
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
42.5 pt

* ... smaller is better

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

018036054072090010801260144016201800198021602340252027002880306032403420Tooltip
HP Victus 16-e0145ng: Ø3249 (2501.09-3562.44)

图形卡

通过GeForce RTX 3050 Ti,Nvidia提供了一个成功的中档GPU,只要你不考虑平庸的光线追踪性能。DirectX-12模型能够使用2560个着色器,包括4GB的GDDR6-VRAM。不幸的是,后者在这一点上已经不是最新的了。我们目前期望中档设备至少有6GB。因此,要求高的游戏在更高的分辨率和设置中会达到其极限。

一般来说,Nvidia的安培芯片的性能在很大程度上取决于配置的TGP。在75瓦(包括动态提升),HD为RTX 3050 Ti选择了一个相当高的数值,这也反映在合成图形基准测试和使用真实游戏的测试中高于平均分。然而,Victus 16在与竞争对手的竞争中仍有一段艰难的时期。华硕Strix G17 G713QE和戴尔G5 5515都能在大多数情况下取得小的优势。更昂贵的Victus 16的GeForce RTX 3060在大多数情况下领先约30%。

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
100 pt
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
56.7 pt
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
44.2 pt
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
37.5 pt
Dell G15 5515
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
35.9 pt
HP Victus 16-e0145ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
35.5 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
 
32.1 pt
3DMark 11 Performance
17816 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
36899 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
13022 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
5910 points
Help

游戏性能

要求不高或不是极端计算密集型的游戏不会对GeForce RTX 3050 Ti造成任何不可逾越的挑战,在1920 x 1080的原生分辨率下的高至最大设置在大多数情况下都没有问题。只有在高要求的游戏中,情况才会变得紧张,例如 福尔扎地平线5, 毁灭之光2战争之神,在所有控制设置为最大的情况下,它并不总是足以实现流畅的帧率。

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (40.1 - 449, n=104, last 2 years)
243 fps +134%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
135 (114min) fps +30%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
104.2 (99min) fps 0%
HP Victus 16-e0145ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R5 5600H
104 (87min) fps
Dell G15 5515
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
102 (37.7min, 54.3P0.1, 78.6P1) fps -2%
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-11300H
91 fps -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30 - 110, n=26)
88.8 fps -15%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=142, last 2 years)
127.7 fps +133%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
70.9 (60min) fps +29%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
58.4 (56min) fps +6%
Dell G15 5515
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
56.6 (13.2min, 25.5P0.1, 43.4P1) fps +3%
HP Victus 16-e0145ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R5 5600H
54.9 (46min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (19 - 58.5, n=29)
47.5 fps -13%
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-11300H
47.1 (45min, 46P1) fps -14%

在恒定负荷测试中,有的情况下 Witcher 3(1小时@FHD/Ultra),我们没有看到任何明显的行为。在整个过程中,性能保持相当稳定。

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
HP Victus 16-e0145ng R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø55.4 (52-57)
HP Victus 16-e0179ng R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: Ø70 (64-73)
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE i5-11300H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø47.1 (45-49)
Dell G15 5515 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø54.9 (50-57)
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø54.4 (18-58)
lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 167.7 131.4 73.7
The Witcher 3 (2015) 176 104 54.9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 139.6 125.3 118 113
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 76.4 54.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 99.3 91.2 74.2
Strange Brigade (2018) 140.1 114.5 98.9
Alan Wake Remastered (2021) 105.4 95.3
Back 4 Blood (2021) 142.8 123.8 116.2
Guardians of the Galaxy (2021) 83 82 79
Riders Republic (2021) 88 69 54
Forza Horizon 5 (2021) 93 84 19
Farming Simulator 22 (2021) 130 104.8 92.3
Halo Infinite (2021) 89.1 59 51.5
God of War (2022) 64.3 50.3 31.3
Rainbow Six Extraction (2022) 116 112 86
Dying Light 2 (2022) 47 39.6
Elden Ring (2022) 59.6 59.6 56.2
Ghostwire Tokyo (2022) 91.1 90 88.2
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) 99.3 68.6 51.8
Vampire Bloodhunt (2022) 132.4 86.2 86.1

排放

噪声排放

噪音的发展让人有些喜忧参半。虽然其他一些游戏笔记本电脑在负载下变得更加响亮,但在3D操作中44至53 dB(A)也不是真的好。凭借这些数值,Victus 16接近其更快的兄弟姐妹。令人惊讶的是,我们甚至测量到空闲运行时的噪音水平略高。当笔记本电脑暂时不忙的时候,风扇要么关闭,要么已经在一个非常可听的噪音水平上运行。在这里,一个恒定的、独立的风扇速度会比较好。

Noise Level

Idle
26 / 28 / 34 dB(A)
Load
44 / 53 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 26 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.74444.141.640.52540.240.139.935.939.53146.652.948.44848.14031.437.132.735.232.15038.732.329.326.738.26329.131.228.528.830.48026.925.525.322.3371002928.124.418.730.412528.724.525.418.832.116026.529.421.519.732.720032.928.426.423.835.32503228.726.826.235.33153026.922.721.338.84003022.917.215.637.350031.631.319.217.938.463031.622.516.516.538.880030.520.713.413.438.4100031.520.713.112.839.9125033.922.212.611.642.8160033.220.911.912.541.8200031.819.812.113.640.5250033.820.812.61342.931503120.71313.240.7400030.916.713.213.240500031.515.313.413.540.9630030.615.513.91443.9800027.414.613.813.741.5100002313.712.913.137.71250019.813.712.712.634.21600017.713.314.212.230.3SPL43.633.727.326.953.1N4.720.90.99.2median 30.9median 20.8median 13.8median 13.6median 38.8Delta2.65.83.42.93.7hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Victus 16-e0145ng
HP Victus 16-e0145ng
R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE
i5-11300H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Dell G15 5515
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Noise
4%
7%
7%
9%
off / environment *
26
24
8%
23.9
8%
24
8%
24.9
4%
Idle Minimum *
26
24
8%
23.9
8%
25
4%
25.1
3%
Idle Average *
28
25
11%
26.8
4%
26
7%
25.1
10%
Idle Maximum *
34
34
-0%
26.8
21%
30
12%
25.1
26%
Load Average *
44
44
-0%
43.5
1%
44
-0%
36.3
17%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48
50
-4%
43.5
9%
44
8%
49.9
-4%
Load Maximum *
53
52
2%
53.1
-0%
48
9%
49.9
6%

* ... smaller is better

温度

像往常一样,机箱在后半部分的升温尤为明显。在Victus 16上的两个点,我们测量到在负载下超过50℃(122°F)。然而,这个数值仍然在游戏笔记本电脑的典型范围内。在机箱内部,主要是处理器发热。在使用Furmark和Prime95工具进行了一个小时的压力测试后,Ryzen 5 600H保持在一个舒适的85℃(185°F)。GeForce RTX 3050 Ti达到适度的75°C(167°F)。

ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
Max. Load
 41 °C54 °C40 °C 
 40 °C51 °C43 °C 
 30 °C33 °C37 °C 
Maximum: 54 °C
Average: 41 °C
46 °C46 °C45 °C
46 °C47 °C40 °C
36 °C42 °C34 °C
Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 42.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  47 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).
HP Victus 16-e0145ng
R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE
i5-11300H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Dell G15 5515
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat
-12%
18%
14%
3%
Maximum Upper Side *
54
51
6%
43.2
20%
50
7%
43.8
19%
Maximum Bottom *
47
52
-11%
47.9
-2%
49
-4%
47.2
-0%
Idle Upper Side *
41
46
-12%
24.9
39%
26
37%
33.4
19%
Idle Bottom *
31
41
-32%
27
13%
26
16%
39.4
-27%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.641.32535.936.6314844.84035.236.95026.730.16328.828.28022.321.510018.721.312518.827.516019.741.520023.850.925026.257.431521.35940015.662.250017.964.863016.566.680013.463.9100012.864.2125011.665.5160012.564.1200013.665.325001362.2315013.263.6400013.266.5500013.572.763001470.9800013.768.91000013.167.91250012.663.61600012.258SPL26.979.1N0.945.4median 13.6median 63.9Delta2.95.530.83523.931.32226.126.927.423.429.523.628.519.221.918.623.918.827.617.633.218.744.117.351.814.65313.753.811.657.212.864.111.369.310.772.610.271.710.770.310.8681165.711.365.511.560.911.959.712.268.112.270.812.263.912.362.712.357.623.9800.545.4median 12.2median 62.71.710hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Victus 16-e0145ngLenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Victus 16-e0145ng audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电源管理

消耗功率

功耗并不突出。闲置操作时的功率在7到15瓦之间,3D操作时的功率在93到185瓦之间,对于游戏笔记本来说是比较有效的,而且对于所使用的硬件来说也是合适的。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.4 / 0.6 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 7 / 9 / 15 Watt
Load midlight 93 / 185 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Victus 16-e0145ng
R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE
i5-11300H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Dell G15 5515
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-7%
19%
2%
-19%
-64%
Idle Minimum *
7
5
29%
4.9
30%
5
29%
9.2
-31%
Idle Average *
9
10
-11%
8.3
8%
9
-0%
12.6
-40%
Idle Maximum *
15
20
-33%
8.9
41%
20
-33%
23.3
-55%
Load Average *
93
108
-16%
81
13%
94
-1%
89.3
4%
Witcher 3 ultra *
134.5
145
-8%
119
12%
123
9%
136
-1%
Load Maximum *
185
189
-2%
172
7%
172
7%
162.7
12%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

0102030405060708090100110120130140150Tooltip
HP Victus 16-e0145ng; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø134.5 (132.1-140.3)
HP Victus 16-e0145ng; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø150.3 (146.1-156.2)

Power Consumption With External Monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
HP Victus 16-e0145ng; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø72.3 (62.1-89.4)
HP Victus 16-e0145ng; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø90.8 (85.8-102)
HP Victus 16-e0145ng; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø104.2 (100.3-131.7)
HP Victus 16-e0145ng; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø110 (107.9-122.3)

电池寿命

电池容量与更昂贵的Victus 16型号相同。70Wh与自动图形切换相结合,确保了坚实的电池寿命。在我们的WLAN测试中,这台16英寸的笔记本电脑在亮度降低到150cd/m²的情况下可以持续使用7小时。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
7h 04min
HP Victus 16-e0145ng
R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 70 Wh
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 70 Wh
Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE
i5-11300H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 45 Wh
Dell G15 5515
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 56 Wh
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 56 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-17%
-6%
13%
-16%
-10%
WiFi v1.3
424
354
-17%
397
-6%
478
13%
358
-16%
Reader / Idle
511
807
667
Load
76
64
91
66
H.264
460
529

Pros

+ 良好的价格性能比
+ 可接受的电池寿命
+ 优雅的设计

Cons

- 显示效果不好(色彩空间、色彩精度、亮度等)。
- 3D操作中的高噪音发展

判决书

惠普Victus 16-e0145ng,测试装置由NBB.com(notebooksbilliger.de)提供。
惠普Victus 16-e0145ng,测试装置由NBB.com(notebooksbilliger.de)提供。

考虑到自己的预算,对图像质量要求不高的玩家可能会喜欢我们在这里测试的Victus 16-e0145ng。

Ryzen 5 5600H,以及GeForce RTX 3050 Ti以及NVMe固态硬盘共同构成了一个平衡的、相当强大的软件包,适合于不同的应用领域。除了显示器的平庸表现(色彩空间覆盖率低,亮度微弱等),惠普笔记本电脑并没有显示出任何较大的弱点。优雅的外壳容纳了相对较好的输入设备和数量可观的端口,尽管你不得不忍受没有Thunderbolt。电池寿命和声音对于这个价格来说也是合适的,尽管它们并没有真正激发人们的热情。

总的来说,我们喜欢Victus 16-e0145ng,比Victus 16-e0145ng好一点。 联想Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU.另一方面,装备相当的 戴尔G15 5515华硕ROG Strix G17 G713QE竞争对手在我们的评估中略微领先。

价格和可用性

惠普Victus 16的类似装备版本,只是配备了Ryzen 7,可从惠普商店购买,价格约为950美元.

HP Victus 16-e0145ng - 05/18/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser

Chassis
77 / 98 → 78%
Keyboard
81%
Pointing Device
81%
Connectivity
63 / 80 → 78%
Weight
60 / 10-66 → 90%
Battery
75 / 95 → 78%
Display
78%
Games Performance
91%
Application Performance
94%
Temperature
82 / 95 → 86%
Noise
74 / 90 → 82%
Audio
73%
Camera
41 / 85 → 48%
Average
75%
82%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 惠普Victus 16回顾。配备AMD CPU和Nvidia GPU的经济实惠的游戏笔记本电脑
Florian Glaser, 2022-05-20 (Update: 2022-05-20)