华硕 Vivobook Pro 16X 评测：配备出色处理器的创意笔记本

Name: Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Brand: Asus

就是快

得益于出色的英特尔酷睿 i9 处理器、性能不俗的 RTX 4060 和 OLED 显示屏，VivoBook Pro 16X 在图像和视频编辑方面的优势毋庸置疑。硬件，尤其是输入设备，也非常适合创作者笔记本。不过，在其他方面也有所节省。

Mario Petzold, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 07/26/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Geforce Windows Laptop / Notebook Raptor Lake

VivoBook Pro 属于多媒体笔记本电脑，主要面向雄心勃勃的家庭用户，用于创意项目。强大的处理器，目前的顶级型号i9-13980HX处理器和各种配置的移动图形处理器确保了足够的工作速度。OLED 显示屏几乎可以逼真地显示相关内容，"华硕拨号盘 "也使该机型有别于普通笔记本电脑。

今天评测的华硕 VivoBook Pro 16X 与典型的 Vivobook（起价约 1500 美元）并不太相似。它的处理器和显示屏都来自专业的 ProArt Studiobook 系列，我们已经评测过这款产品华硕 ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604.而外壳和许多功能则保持了简洁。因此，VivoBook Pro 16X 在家用超强笔记本电脑和（过于）简单的创意工作设备之间的灰色地带游走。

同级别的竞争对手包括技嘉 AERO 16 OLED或三星Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16。我们的评测将揭示 Vivobook 能否借鉴专业领域的设计。

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W (VivoBook Pro 16X Series)

Processor

Intel Core i9-13980HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.6 GHz, 157 W PL2 / Short Burst, 80 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 2370 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 140 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, Nvidia Studio 536.40, MUX-Switch

Memory

32 GB

, DDR5-4800, Dual-Channel, SK Hynix

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 3200 x 2000 pixel 236 PPI, Samsung SDC4178 ATNA60BX01-1, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Mainboard

Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)

Storage

Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ, 1024 GB

Soundcard

Intel Raptor Point-S PCH - HD Audio (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Headset, Card Reader: SD-Card, 1 Fingerprint Reader

Networking

Realtek Semiconductor RTL8168/8111 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 22.8 x 355 x 251

Battery

90 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: Full-HD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix 1080p FHD camera with privacy shutter

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, MyAsus, ProArt Creator Hub, Asus Control Panel, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.09 kg, Power Supply: 730 g

Price

2700 Euro

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
86.2 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2023	Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	22.8 mm	16.00"	3200x2000
90.3 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2023	Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1.9 kg	18 mm	15.60"	3456x2160
89.4 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2023	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	1.8 kg	16.5 mm	16.00"	2880x1800
88.6 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2023	SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1.6 kg	17.1 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
86.1 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2023	Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	23.9 mm	16.00"	3200x2000
83.8 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2022	MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	19 mm	17.00"	2560x1600

外壳 - Vivobook 上的塑料太多了

Vivobook Pro 16X 的外壳完全由黑色塑料制成，给人一种相当简洁的印象。霓虹橙色的脚垫为其增添了一抹亮色。底座和铰链的做工非常扎实。用一个前角夹住机身时，只能引起极小的扭转。此外，显示屏始终稳固地保持在设定的角度，角度刚刚超过 140°。

另一方面，显示屏盖和 OLED 屏幕的边框本可以设计得更好。由于是塑料盖，显示屏弯曲也就不足为奇了。边缘也不平直，这也表现在屏幕难看的弧度上。此外，在我们的测试机型中，屏幕右侧的显示屏边框有一个缝隙，灰尘很快就积聚在里面。

对于一款配备 16 英寸屏幕的笔记本电脑来说，外壳的重量和尺寸都很一般。屏幕三星Galaxy Book3 Ultra则更轻薄。华硕华硕 ProArt Studiobook则更大更重。

尺寸比较

MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 DIN A4 ❌

设备 - 包括所有重要设备和两个 TB4

所有重要的端口都分布在左右两侧。无论是范围还是数量，都无可挑剔。两侧都有一个 USB-A 端口，非常方便。通过 SD 读卡器可以轻松地从相机复制视频和图像数据。通过 LAN 端口，可以在桌面上快速建立网络连接。此外，还有两个 Thunderbolt 4 端口，可用于快速数据交换、扩展坞或在必要时为电池充电。

右侧端口：耳机、USB-A（5 Gbit/s）、HDMI 2.1 FRL、两个 Thunderbolt 4

SD 读卡器

借助功能齐全的 SD 读卡器，我们的 AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60 参考卡实现了稳定的传输速率。平均 120 MB/s 的传输速率意味着只需不到 4 分钟就能拷贝完一张 32 GB 的卡。如果使用三星Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16为例。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	153.8 MB/s +28%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	120 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=59, last 2 years)	103.3 MB/s -14%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	79.6 MB/s -34%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	74 MB/s -38%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)	73.7 MB/s -39%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	23.3 MB/s -81%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	182 MB/s +44%
Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years)	142.9 MB/s +13%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	126 MB/s
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)	83.1 MB/s -34%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	83 MB/s -34%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	76.3 MB/s -39%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	26.1 MB/s -79%

交流

安装的英特尔 AX211 无线局域网模块可以更换，传输速率一直很高。接收数据的测量值略低于 1,700 Mbps，比使用相同硬件的所有记录值的平均值高出近 25%。例如，戴尔的 XPS 15 9530 虽然也使用了英特尔的 AX211，但成绩却比它差了约三分之一。

此外，它还配备了一个来自 Realtek 的千兆 LAN 端口，用于有线传输。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1630 (1571^min - 1660^max) MBit/s +13%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1612 (1550^min, 1553.77^P1 - 1667^max) MBit/s +12%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1493 (1452^min - 1534^max) MBit/s +3%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1444 (1147^min - 1531^max) MBit/s
Average of class Multimedia (358 - 1921, n=79, last 2 years)	1365 MBit/s -5%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (64 - 1921, n=242)	1231 MBit/s -15%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	894 (804^min - 975^max) MBit/s -38%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1735 (1691^min, 1696.22^P1 - 1753^max) MBit/s +1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1714 (1675^min - 1737^max) MBit/s
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1687 (1665^min - 1702^max) MBit/s -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1638 (1438^min - 1710^max) MBit/s -4%
Average of class Multimedia (709 - 1789, n=78, last 2 years)	1454 MBit/s -15%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=242)	1382 MBit/s -19%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1235 (676^min - 1389^max) MBit/s -28%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1492 (1095^min - 1659^max) MBit/s
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1455 (1105^min - 1672^max) MBit/s -2%
Average of class Multimedia (705 - 1816, n=35, last 2 years)	1410 MBit/s -5%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (385 - 1851, n=214)	1368 MBit/s -8%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1732 (1669^min - 1745^max) MBit/s
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1701 (1471^min - 1746^max) MBit/s -2%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (700 - 1857, n=213)	1493 MBit/s -14%
Average of class Multimedia (700 - 1807, n=35, last 2 years)	1487 MBit/s -14%

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1444 (1147-1531)

Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø895 (804-975)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1493 (1452-1534)

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1714 (1675-1737)

Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1212 (676-1389)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1637 (1438-1710)

网络摄像头

全高清网络摄像头的功能非常强大。有一个机械快门，与脚垫和Esc 按钮的橙色相同。此外，还安装了用于通过面部识别登录的红外摄像头和双阵列麦克风。

在图像质量方面，肯定还有改进的余地。虽然在环境光线不足的情况下，视频图像的亮度令人信服，但同时图像噪点也大大增加。另一方面，语音的录制质量很好。声音听起来很自然，从不同距离和说话方向录制的声音也很均匀。

Vivobook Pro 16X 的网络摄像头，带快门、红外摄像头和良好的麦克风

ColorChecker Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W: 17.91 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 29.89 ∆E

维护

需要拧松 11 个十字螺丝。松开许多塑料夹子也需要一定的力量。通常情况下，建议从铰链旁边开始。使用小型杠杆工具或撬棍，可以轻松打开底部，而不会造成损坏。

电池、内存、固态硬盘和 WLAN 模块都很容易拆卸和更换。遗憾的是，没有第二个用于 M.2 NVMe 固态硬盘的插槽。

保修

华硕提供为期 2 年的制造商保修，但仅限于电池的法定保修。要使用保修服务，VivoBook 必须在购买后向华硕注册。这些条件在其他地区可能有所不同，因此感兴趣的买家在购买前应仔细确认。

输入设备 - 带实用表盘的 Vivobook

键盘

键盘上的数字键盘功能齐全，键程为 1.4 毫米（我们的测量值），背压分布合理，给人留下了极好的印象。此外，键盘背光采用了三级均匀背光。

遗憾的是，键盘边框在键入时晃动过大。这很可能会成为一个干扰因素，即使是对于不那么娇气的经常打字的人来说也是如此。

触摸板

触摸板的尺寸为 8 x 13 厘米，大而精确，并设有易于按下的隐藏按钮，给人留下了良好的印象。

通过右上角的按钮，还可以在左上角显示控制滚轮。但它并不像华硕 ProArt Studiobook 上安装的物理滚轮那样精确可靠。华硕 ProArt Studiobook尽管如此，它还是通过调节亮度和音量的基本功能赢得了一席之地。ProArt 软件还可用于添加各种功能，例如，存储不同应用的组合键。

例如，在视频编辑中，可以在帧与帧之间滚动。在图像编辑中，可以直接访问对比度和色彩设置。当然，只要知道组合键，其他一切都可以通过控制面板进行控制。

显示屏 - 色彩丰富的 OLED 无触摸屏

OLED 显示屏在 VivoBook Pro 16X 中也发挥了它的优势。深邃的黑色和由此产生的高对比度使得色彩明亮而生动。即使无需进一步校准，也能几乎完美地再现色彩。

3,200 x 2,000 像素的非凡分辨率符合 16:10 格式，大致介于 QHD 和 4K 之间。在 16 英寸的显示屏上，它能确保高分辨率数码照片的细腻显示，至少在截面上是如此，而不会像 4K 那样显示得过于微小。

仅有的平均亮度没有任何缺点，至少在室内是如此。由于黑色值很低，图像看起来比 IPS 面板更亮。不过，在 SDR 模式下，由于表面光滑，室外的可视度仅略低于 350 cd/m²。

与采用 OLED 显示屏的同类产品相比，华硕 VivoBook 只使用了 120 Hz 的帧频，这也与测量到的 120 Hz 精确的 PWM 闪烁相对应。虽然这种闪烁比 TN 或某些 IPS 面板要细微得多，但对于敏感的眼睛来说仍是可以察觉到的。在亮度为 60% 及以下时，闪烁频率还会增加到 240 Hz。

OLED 显示器不会出现屏幕出血或光晕现象。


341 cd/m²	350 cd/m²	340 cd/m²
352 cd/m²	347 cd/m²	346 cd/m²
347 cd/m²	343 cd/m²	350 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Samsung SDC4178 ATNA60BX01-1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 352 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 346.2 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Contrast: 5783:1 (Black: 0.06 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.89 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.97
ΔE Greyscale 1.55 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.39

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Samsung SDC4178 ATNA60BX01-1, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"	Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Samsung 156XG01, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.6"	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung ATNA60CL03-0, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16"	Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 ATNA60BX01-1, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"	SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 AUO3C9B (B170QAN01.0), IPS, 2560x1600, 17"
Display		1%	1%	-2%	-19%	-3%
Display P3 Coverage	98.4	99.8 1%	99.9 2%	99.6 1%	68.8 -30%	98.9 1%
sRGB Coverage	99.7	100 0%	100 0%	100 0%	98.8 -1%	99.9 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	95.8	98.4 3%	96.3 1%	89.4 -7%	70 -27%	86.4 -10%
Response Times		18%	74%	69%	-618%	-423%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	1.6 ?(0.8, 0.8)	1.68 ?(0.8, 0.88) -5%	0.49 ?(0.26, 0.23) 69%	0.59 ?(0.29, 0.3) 63%	13.7 ?(6.7, 7) -756%	11 ?(5, 6) -588%
Response Time Black / White *	1.4 ?(0.6, 0.8)	1.94 ?(0.97, 0.97) -39%	0.65 ?(0.37, 0.28) 54%	0.79 ?(0.34, 0.45) 44%	8.1 ?(3.8, 4.3) -479%	5 ?(2, 3) -257%
PWM Frequency	120 ?(100)	239 99%	240 ?(100) 100%	240 ?(100) 100%
Screen		-44%	11%	23%	-91%	-147%
Brightness middle	347	389.5 12%	400 15%	349 1%	384 11%	444 28%
Brightness	346	392 13%	399 15%	350 1%	371 7%	415 20%
Brightness Distribution	97	98 1%	93 -4%	95 -2%	88 -9%	88 -9%
Black Level *	0.06		0.03 50%	0.02 67%	0.3 -400%	0.7 -1067%
Contrast	5783		13333 131%	17450 202%	1280 -78%	634 -89%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.89	4.95 -162%	2.3 -22%	2.1 -11%	3.4 -80%	2.48 -31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.26	8.65 -165%	4.15 -27%	5.5 -69%	9.2 -182%	3.52 -8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.97	1.53 22%	1.66 16%	2.1 -7%	1.3 34%	2.91 -48%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.55	2 -29%	2.7 -74%	1.2 23%	3.4 -119%	3.33 -115%
Gamma	2.39 ^92%	2.27 ^97%	2.266 ^97%	2.19 ^100%	2.16 ^102%	2.33 ^94%
CCT	6458 ^101%	6265 ^104%	7047 ^92%	6545 ^99%	7462 ^87%	6230 ^104%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-8% / -19%	29% / 22%	30% / 27%	-243% / -151%	-191% / -155%

* ... smaller is better

在极暗的色调中，屏幕并没有完全覆盖 sRGB 色彩空间，不过 99.7% 的覆盖率也完全足够了。AdobeRGB 色彩空间也是如此，覆盖率接近 96%。在这方面，VivoBook Pro 16X 也明显领先于华硕 Studiobook 16在 AdobeRGB 色彩空间中仅达到 89%。

平均 DeltaE 值小于 2，色彩还原近乎自然。即使是训练有素的眼睛也不太可能察觉到差异。在没有进一步校准的情况下也是如此，但校准并没有带来任何改善。鉴于偏差极小，这样做是没有必要的。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.6 ms rise
1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.8 ms rise
1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120 Hz

≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

尤其是屏幕的光泽表面，这意味着在明亮的环境中，反光会使清晰度大打折扣，而在阳光下则几乎不可能。另一方面，只要你坐在阴凉处，就可以在室外使用 VivoBook Pro 工作。但你应该坐在室内进行图像编辑。

正如 OLED 面板所预期的那样，亮度和色彩再现在所有正常视角下都保持稳定。在超过 80° 的非常陡峭的角度下，OLED 的色彩偏差也非常明显。

性能 - VivoBook 的最高工作速度

我们的总体印象非常好，这主要归功于英特尔酷睿 i9-13980HX是目前最好的移动处理器之一。可选的英伟达GeForce RTX 4060或 RTX 4070主要用于加速图像处理、视频编辑、渲染，当然还有 3D 应用程序。

华硕 VivoBook Pro 16X 的超快工作速度给人留下了深刻印象。它可以毫不费力地处理复杂、图形要求高的应用程序，并且喜欢多任务处理。32 GB 的内存并没有耗尽 5,600 MHz 的最大时钟频率，而是达到了 4,800 MHz，与系统相得益彰。

测试条件

VivoBook Pro 16X 的设置选项仅限于三种模式。最高性能 "模式也会导致最大风扇噪音，在极端情况下性能提升明显，但在日常工作中只能起到辅助作用。

因此，所有测试都使用了 "标准 "模式，在该模式下，处理器和显卡的供电略有减少。此外，还添加了 "静音 "作为补充。在这种模式下，重点是近乎静音工作，因此在短时间负载后，最大可能的计算性能总是要降低。不过，在标准模式下，我们没有发现任何严重的节流现象。

下表汇总了 CPU 和 GPU 的最大功耗以及测得的风扇噪音。

能源概况	CPU 负载	GPU 负载	最大风扇容量
标准	157/80 瓦	90 瓦	37.0 分贝(A)
高性能	157/157 瓦	115 瓦	56.7 分贝(A)
静音	105/55 瓦	80 瓦	29.2 dB(A)

处理器

华硕 VivoBook Pro 拥有英特尔酷睿 i9-13980HX 处理器，超越它的笔记本电脑并不多。英特尔酷睿 i9-13980HX的笔记本电脑。更大、更重的游戏笔记本，如联想Legion Pro 7或华硕 ROG Strix G17等较大型、较重的游戏笔记本电脑与之不相上下，甚至更胜一筹。 AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX.i9-13980HX 拥有 8 个性能内核和总共 32 个线程，最高主频为 5.6 GHz，并配有外置控制器。 i9-13980HX当然是装备精良。

华硕华硕 ProArt Studiobook 16只要设置了性能模式，华硕 ProArt Studiobook 16 的性能也处于同一水平。尽管 VivoBook 的功耗 "只 "允许达到 157 W，而不是 170 W，但我们的基准测试结果往往要高出 10%。由于风扇功率大幅增加，持续性能值也略有提高，这在 Cinebench R15 循环中可以清楚地看到。标准模式和高性能 模式的数值如图所示。

在风扇噪音适中的 "标准 "模式下，测得的数值较弱，但依然出色。采用较小 CPU（如英特尔酷睿 i7-13700H等较小 CPU 的多媒体笔记本电脑的性能明显更胜一筹。这反映在各种 CPU 基准测试中，与 VivoBook 的差距非常明显。

在静音模式下，CPU 的节流相对较快，否则会因散热效果降低而过热。拔掉电源插头后，性能会明显下降。例如，在 Cinebench R23 多核测试中仅达到不到 11000 分。这只是标准模式下得分的三分之一，但与我们在过去两年中评测过的所有多媒体笔记本电脑的平均水平相差无几。

更多基准测试和信息，请参阅我们的 CPU 基准测试列表.

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX: Ø3763 (3529.2-4703.12)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø1739 (1422.32-2515.18)

Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX: Ø4477 (4374.45-4604.05)

MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2349 (2273.63-2626.4)

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX: Ø4920 (4749.47-5204.94)

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4469 (4358.72-4684.94)

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX; Höchste Leistung: Ø4345 (3864.36-4543.91)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX	84.9 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX	83.8 pt
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	77 pt
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H	57.9 pt
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H	57.4 pt
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	55.8 pt
Average of class Multimedia	52.5 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	52 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX	30789 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (28301 - 33052, n=11)	30305 Points +5%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	28963 Points
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H	16346 Points -44%
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=103, last 2 years)	15626 Points -46%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H	15474 (14020.7^min - 15473.8^max) Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	15306 Points -47%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	14760 Points -49%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX	2110 Points +16%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (1825 - 2169, n=9)	2081 Points +14%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	1885 Points +3%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H	1864 Points +2%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H	1836 Points +1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	1825 Points
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=94, last 2 years)	1767 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	1698 Points -7%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX	11768 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (10353 - 12437, n=10)	11540 Points +2%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	11260 Points
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H	6060 Points -46%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H	5986 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	5926 Points -47%
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11924, n=87, last 2 years)	5746 Points -49%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	5672 Points -50%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX	812 Points +13%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (717 - 825, n=10)	789 Points +10%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	729 Points +2%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	717 Points
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H	714 Points 0%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H	696 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	657 Points -8%
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years)	650 Points -9%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (4358 - 5172, n=11)	4708 Points 0%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	4703 (3529.2^min - 4703.12^max) Points
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX	4604 (4374.45^min - 4604.05^max) Points -2%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H	2637 (2072.22^min - 2636.96^max) Points -44%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H	2626 (2273.63^min - 2626.4^max) Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	2515 Points -47%
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 5224, n=94, last 2 years)	2469 Points -48%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	2253 (2076.41^min - 2253.14^max) Points -52%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX	308 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (289 - 312, n=11)	303 Points +5%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	289 Points
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	276 Points -4%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H	270 Points -7%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H	261 Points -10%
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=89, last 2 years)	258 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	246 Points -15%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Multimedia (100 - 502, n=85, last 2 years)	252 Seconds * -85%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	223 Seconds * -64%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	221 Seconds * -63%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H	217 Seconds * -60%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H	210 Seconds * -54%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	136 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (97 - 136, n=10)	109.3 Seconds * +20%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX	107 Seconds * +21%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX	119900 MIPS +15%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (104616 - 129804, n=10)	118278 MIPS +13%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	104616 MIPS
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H	62428 MIPS -40%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	61921 MIPS -41%
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 130368, n=79, last 2 years)	60972 MIPS -42%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	60842 MIPS -42%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H	59413 MIPS -43%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX	7163 MIPS +3%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	6972 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (6230 - 7163, n=10)	6915 MIPS -1%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	6224 MIPS -11%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H	6124 MIPS -12%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H	5861 MIPS -16%
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years)	5726 MIPS -18%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	5510 MIPS -21%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (18475 - 22200, n=10)	20092 Points +9%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX	20053 Points +9%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	18475 Points
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H	13308 Points -28%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H	13241 Points -28%
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=86, last 2 years)	12203 Points -34%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	11808 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	11497 Points -38%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX	2137 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (1796 - 2139, n=10)	2051 Points +2%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	2001 Points
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H	1900 Points -5%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	1885 Points -6%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H	1866 Points -7%
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2555, n=86, last 2 years)	1831 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	1692 Points -15%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (27 - 33.4, n=9)	31.1 fps +15%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX	30.5 fps +13%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	27 fps
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H	17.6 fps -35%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H	17.6 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	16.8 fps -38%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	16.6 fps -39%
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 34.3, n=78, last 2 years)	16.6 fps -39%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	51.4 s *
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	49.6 s * +4%
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=81, last 2 years)	49.2 s * +4%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	47.6 s * +7%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX	44.2 s * +14%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H	43.5 s * +15%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (35 - 51.4, n=10)	43 s * +16%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H	40.6 s * +21%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	0.489 sec * -21%
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years)	0.4845 sec * -20%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H	0.4501 sec * -11%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H	0.4384 sec * -8%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	0.434 sec * -7%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	0.4041 sec *
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (0.3793 - 0.4462, n=10)	0.3959 sec * +2%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX	0.3826 sec * +5%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

4703 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

261 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

289 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

11260 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

717 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1825 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

28963 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	99.1 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX	98.2 pt
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	82.1 pt
Average of class Multimedia	58.7 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	58.4 pt
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	56.8 pt
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	56.5 pt
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	49.7 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	27340 KRay/s +28%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (21332 - 29553, n=9)	26707 KRay/s +25%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	21332 KRay/s
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 50388, n=76, last 2 years)	14848 KRay/s -30%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	14049 KRay/s -34%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13869 KRay/s -35%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13486 KRay/s -37%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	8187 KRay/s -62%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	136048 Points +26%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (108001 - 148168, n=9)	132982 Points +23%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	108001 Points
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 201874, n=77, last 2 years)	74206 Points -31%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	70104 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	69259 Points -36%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	69120 Points -36%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	37985 Points -65%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	6681 MB/s +27%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (5264 - 7142, n=9)	6559 MB/s +25%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	5264 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 8623, n=77, last 2 years)	3449 MB/s -34%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	3247 MB/s -38%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	3200 MB/s -39%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	3146 MB/s -40%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2885 MB/s -45%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (126758 - 143409, n=9)	138011 Points +9%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	134321 Points +6%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	126758 Points
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	105172 Points -17%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	103652 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	100136 Points -21%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	99961 Points -21%
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 181505, n=77, last 2 years)	91462 Points -28%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (13785 - 17117, n=9)	16075 Points +17%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	15484 Points +12%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	13785 Points
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 28794, n=77, last 2 years)	9567 Points -31%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	9130 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	9065 Points -34%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	8982 Points -35%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	8714 Points -37%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	68591 Points +28%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (53398 - 73758, n=9)	66568 Points +25%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	53398 Points
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 105740, n=76, last 2 years)	37006 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	34531 Points -35%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	33848 Points -37%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	33488 Points -37%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	21952 Points -59%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	128312 MB/s +22%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (105169 - 136520, n=9)	126745 MB/s +21%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	105169 MB/s
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	88696 MB/s -16%
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years)	75833 MB/s -28%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	67264 MB/s -36%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	66616 MB/s -37%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	62599 MB/s -40%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1901 MB/s +26%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (1513 - 2039, n=9)	1894 MB/s +25%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	1513 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	997 MB/s -34%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	952 MB/s -37%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	948 MB/s -37%
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 2022, n=77, last 2 years)	947 MB/s -37%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	918 MB/s -39%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (11431 - 16325, n=9)	14483 KRay/s +27%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	14155 KRay/s +24%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	11431 KRay/s
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 26875, n=77, last 2 years)	8055 KRay/s -30%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	7496 KRay/s -34%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	7475 KRay/s -35%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	7240 KRay/s -37%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	4639 KRay/s -59%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	49474 MPixel/s +13%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	48148 MPixel/s +10%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (37069 - 52949, n=9)	46025 MPixel/s +5%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	44545 MPixel/s +1%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	44101 MPixel/s 0%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	43965 MPixel/s
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years)	40715 MPixel/s -7%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	39549 MPixel/s -10%

系统性能

与纯 CPU 测试相比，PCMark 10 的评分稍弱。不过，如果选择 "性能 "模式，与最佳机型的差距很小。在 CrossMark 中，华硕笔记本电脑即使在标准设置下也遥遥领先。

总的来说，Vivobook Pro 的速度始终如一。要求苛刻的应用程序并不会完全耗尽它的性能，因此笔记本始终可用。安装、并行启动程序等都不会造成问题。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47	7491 Points +9%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	7368 Points +7%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	7253 Points +5%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	7087 Points +3%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	6883 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ()	6883 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	6822 Points -1%
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years)	6815 Points -1%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	11449 Points +9%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47	10928 Points +4%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	10753 Points +2%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	10547 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ()	10547 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	10544 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years)	10509 Points 0%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10266 Points -3%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47	9886 Points +9%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	9511 Points +5%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	9402 Points +4%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	9030 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ()	9030 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years)	8959 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	8578 Points -5%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	8501 Points -6%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	10691 Points +15%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	10637 Points +14%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47	10558 Points +14%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10009 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	9527 Points +3%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	9291 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ()	9291 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years)	9265 Points 0%

CrossMark / Overall
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47	2114 Points +3%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	2050 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ()	2050 Points 0%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2009 Points -2%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1896 Points -8%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1888 Points -8%
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2255, n=90, last 2 years)	1717 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1569 Points -23%

CrossMark / Productivity
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47	1950 Points +2%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	1919 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ()	1919 Points 0%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1914 Points 0%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1822 Points -5%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1754 Points -9%
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2042, n=90, last 2 years)	1626 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1479 Points -23%

CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47	2414 Points +3%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	2353 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ()	2353 Points 0%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2148 Points -9%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2137 Points -9%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2012 Points -14%
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2795, n=90, last 2 years)	1934 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1691 Points -28%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1898 Points +15%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47	1811 Points +10%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1789 Points +8%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	1651 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ()	1651 Points 0%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1627 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1495 Points -9%
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2094, n=90, last 2 years)	1436 Points -13%

PCMark 10 Score		6883 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	74320 MB/s +9%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	71912 MB/s +5%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (62189 - 80776, n=9)	71190 MB/s +4%
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years)	68909 MB/s +1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	68474 MB/s
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	66025 MB/s -4%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	65071 MB/s -5%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	61813 MB/s -10%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	77376 MB/s +2%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (62624 - 89096, n=9)	76728 MB/s +2%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	75581 MB/s
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	70707 MB/s -6%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	70378 MB/s -7%
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years)	70133 MB/s -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	69534 MB/s -8%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	65134 MB/s -14%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	88988 MB/s +32%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	71784 MB/s +6%
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years)	70164 MB/s +4%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (59912 - 79917, n=9)	69396 MB/s +3%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	67649 MB/s
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	67424 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	67041 MB/s -1%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	64444 MB/s -5%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years)	106.9 ns * -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	97.5 ns * -8%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	95 ns * -6%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	89.9 ns *
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX (79.4 - 93.2, n=9)	87.5 ns * +3%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86.9 ns * +3%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	85.6 ns * +5%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	84.2 ns * +6%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

实时音频编辑并不是华硕 VivoBook Pro 16X 的强项。在当前配置下，内核模式驱动程序和 Nvidia 的 Studio 驱动程序等会导致过高的延迟。不过，如果修改了驱动程序和其他软件，情况就会大不一样。

在 4K 视频流中只出现了 3 次丢帧；而一台多媒体笔记本不应该出现任何丢帧。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	4545.9 μs * -84%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	2472 μs *
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47	2025.1 μs * +18%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1595 μs * +35%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1083.5 μs * +56%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	893 μs * +64%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

对于 PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘来说，我们记录到的数值始终偏低，尽管制造商规定的最大传输速率略高于 4000 MB/s，仅为理论最大值的三分之二。在其他读写测试中，我们也测得了低于平均水平的数值。

在编辑原始数据的高强度读写过程中，这种行为可能会对系统性能产生负面影响。另一方面，在所有其他任务中应该不会出现负面影响。

系统三星Galaxy Book3 Ultra或申克 Vision 16 Pro在这方面明显领先。但至少固态硬盘可以轻松更换。

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ

Sequential Read: 3160MB/s

Sequential Write: 2044MB/s

4K Read: 55.48MB/s

4K Write: 248.8MB/s

4K-64 Read: 843MB/s

4K-64 Write: 1712MB/s

Access Time Read: 0.141ms

Access Time Write: 0.033ms

Score Read: 1215Points

Score Write: 2165Points

Score Total: 3959Points

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	94.2 pt
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	76 pt
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Phison EM2804TBMTCB47	74.4 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	71 pt
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	64.9 pt
Average of class Multimedia	56.7 pt
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	46.5 pt
Average Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	46.5 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	3925 (3809.41^min - 3925.24^max) MB/s +67%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Phison EM2804TBMTCB47	3687 (3440.34^min - 3686.58^max) MB/s +57%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3077 (2170.13^min - 3076.66^max) MB/s +31%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3005 (2951.71^min - 3004.87^max) MB/s +28%
Average of class Multimedia (888 - 4861, n=76, last 2 years)	2958 MB/s +26%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2511 (2497.5^min - 2511.13^max) MB/s +7%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	2353 (2142.12^min - 2352.79^max) MB/s
Average Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ ()	2353 MB/s 0%
seq write
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5155 (4427.3^min - 5155.43^max) MB/s +129%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4318 (3988.57^min - 4318.21^max) MB/s +92%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3845 (3754.57^min - 3844.71^max) MB/s +71%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Phison EM2804TBMTCB47	3783 MB/s +68%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3530 (3501.32^min - 3530^max) MB/s +57%
Average of class Multimedia (463 - 5711, n=76, last 2 years)	3086 MB/s +37%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	2252 (2149.48^min - 2252.34^max) MB/s
Average Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ ()	2252 MB/s 0%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	7121 (6367.95^min - 7120.69^max) MB/s +79%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Phison EM2804TBMTCB47	7020 (6541.02^min - 7019.8^max) MB/s +77%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6734 (5940.88^min - 6734.33^max) MB/s +69%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	6601 (5818.24^min - 6601.01^max) MB/s +66%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6570 (5809.83^min - 6569.96^max) MB/s +65%
Average of class Multimedia (944 - 7126, n=76, last 2 years)	5413 MB/s +36%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	3974 (3600.81^min - 3974.33^max) MB/s
Average Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ ()	3974 MB/s 0%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	6761 (6735.84^min - 6761.33^max) MB/s +130%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Phison EM2804TBMTCB47	6454 (6410.36^min - 6454.19^max) MB/s +120%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6104 (6052.8^min - 6104.18^max) MB/s +108%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4955 (4541.17^min - 4954.68^max) MB/s +69%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	4886 (4877.24^min - 4885.61^max) MB/s +67%
Average of class Multimedia (555 - 6898, n=76, last 2 years)	4155 MB/s +42%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	2934 (2895.62^min - 2933.5^max) MB/s
Average Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ ()	2934 MB/s 0%
4k q1 t1 read
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	83.7 (81.88^min - 83.66^max) MB/s +54%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	73.6 (72.25^min - 73.56^max) MB/s +35%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	71.1 (69.1^min - 71.12^max) MB/s +31%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Phison EM2804TBMTCB47	71.1 (70.39^min - 71.1^max) MB/s +31%
Average of class Multimedia (14.6 - 97.7, n=76, last 2 years)	63.3 MB/s +16%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	54.4 (50.25^min - 54.39^max) MB/s
Average Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ ()	54.4 MB/s 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	53.1 (52.47^min - 53.13^max) MB/s -2%
4k q1 t1 write
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	267 (266.37^min - 267.43^max) MB/s +53%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	233 (226.09^min - 232.83^max) MB/s +34%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	214 (213.09^min - 214.01^max) MB/s +23%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Phison EM2804TBMTCB47	183.3 (141.67^min - 183.25^max) MB/s +5%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	175.2 (173.12^min - 175.17^max) MB/s 0%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	174.5 (172.12^min - 174.51^max) MB/s
Average Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ ()	174.5 MB/s 0%
Average of class Multimedia (69.4 - 378, n=76, last 2 years)	169.8 MB/s -3%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4358 (4325.31^min - 4358.41^max) MB/s +381%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2863 (2854.77^min - 2863.33^max) MB/s +216%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	2518 (2508.69^min - 2518.06^max) MB/s +178%
Average of class Multimedia (295 - 4881, n=76, last 2 years)	1380 MB/s +52%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	906 (859.8^min - 906.06^max) MB/s
Average Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ ()	906 MB/s 0%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Phison EM2804TBMTCB47	694 (677.77^min - 693.63^max) MB/s -23%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	681 (654.71^min - 680.72^max) MB/s -25%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3090 (3060.74^min - 3090.41^max) MB/s +458%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2687 (2662.73^min - 2686.55^max) MB/s +385%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	2002 (1558.72^min - 2002.2^max) MB/s +261%
Average of class Multimedia (192.1 - 4074, n=76, last 2 years)	1020 MB/s +84%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Phison EM2804TBMTCB47	558 (516.09^min - 558.29^max) MB/s +1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	554 (543.86^min - 553.56^max) MB/s
Average Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ ()	554 MB/s 0%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	510 (500.59^min - 509.88^max) MB/s -8%

AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	9172 Points +132%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	7141 Points +80%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Phison EM2804TBMTCB47	7095 Points +79%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6791 Points +72%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5903 Points +49%
Average of class Multimedia (2033 - 9972, n=73, last 2 years)	5024 Points +27%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	3959 Points
Average Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ ()	3959 Points 0%
Score Read
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3369 Points +177%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2575 Points +112%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	2447 Points +101%
Average of class Multimedia (669 - 3501, n=73, last 2 years)	1619 Points +33%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Phison EM2804TBMTCB47	1570 Points +29%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1433 Points +18%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	1215 Points
Average Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ ()	1215 Points 0%
Score Write
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Phison EM2804TBMTCB47	4813 Points +122%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4082 Points +89%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3834 Points +77%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3504 Points +62%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2820 Points +30%
Average of class Multimedia (656 - 4813, n=73, last 2 years)	2638 Points +22%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	2165 Points
Average Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ ()	2165 Points 0%
Seq Read
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Phison EM2804TBMTCB47	5350 MB/s +69%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5128 MB/s +62%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5103.97 MB/s +62%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	4685.43 MB/s +48%
Average of class Multimedia (837 - 5730, n=73, last 2 years)	4213 MB/s +33%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	3160 MB/s
Average Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ ()	3160 MB/s 0%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2689 MB/s -15%
Seq Write
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5101 MB/s +150%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4195 MB/s +105%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3440.79 MB/s +68%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Phison EM2804TBMTCB47	3138 MB/s +54%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2808.19 MB/s +37%
Average of class Multimedia (414 - 5651, n=73, last 2 years)	2759 MB/s +35%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	2044 MB/s
Average Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ ()	2044 MB/s 0%
4K Read
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	75.8 MB/s +37%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Phison EM2804TBMTCB47	74.1 MB/s +34%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	68.88 MB/s +24%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	65.56 MB/s +18%
Average of class Multimedia (28.7 - 97.4, n=73, last 2 years)	61.5 MB/s +11%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	57.42 MB/s +3%
Average Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ ()	55.5 MB/s 0%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	55.48 MB/s
4K Write
Average Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ ()	249 MB/s 0%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	248.8 MB/s
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	247.17 MB/s -1%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Phison EM2804TBMTCB47	235 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	231 MB/s -7%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	204.95 MB/s -18%
Average of class Multimedia (66.5 - 328, n=73, last 2 years)	188.4 MB/s -24%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	186.47 MB/s -25%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2780 MB/s +230%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2240.69 MB/s +166%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1920.85 MB/s +128%
Average of class Multimedia (350 - 2989, n=73, last 2 years)	1136 MB/s +35%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Phison EM2804TBMTCB47	961 MB/s +14%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	853.63 MB/s +1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	843 MB/s
Average Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ ()	843 MB/s 0%
4K-64 Write
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Phison EM2804TBMTCB47	4265 MB/s +149%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3341 MB/s +95%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3305.51 MB/s +93%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	2973.32 MB/s +74%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2195.15 MB/s +28%
Average of class Multimedia (411 - 4265, n=73, last 2 years)	2173 MB/s +27%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	1712 MB/s
Average Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ ()	1712 MB/s 0%
Access Time Read
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	0.141 ms *
Average Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ ()	0.141 ms * -0%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	0.079 ms * +44%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.056 ms * +60%
Average of class Multimedia (0.018 - 0.15, n=73, last 2 years)	0.05459 ms * +61%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Phison EM2804TBMTCB47	0.036 ms * +74%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	0.03 ms * +79%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.018 ms * +87%
Access Time Write
Average of class Multimedia (0.013 - 0.414, n=73, last 2 years)	0.06053 ms * -83%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	0.053 ms * -61%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	0.033 ms *
Average Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ ()	0.033 ms * -0%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	0.023 ms * +30%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.021 ms * +36%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.017 ms * +48%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Phison EM2804TBMTCB47	0.013 ms * +61%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ: Ø3923 (3225.79-4033.87)

Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N: Ø6457 (5082.24-6523.03)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ: Ø6485 (5652.89-6541.77)

图形卡

除了集成的英特尔UHD Graphics 芯片，还有英伟达GeForce RTX 4060还安装了 Nvidia RTX 4060。理论上，两者的最大输出功率均为 140 瓦，这也是制造商所允许的。

然而，即使在要求苛刻的任务中，也只能达到 115 W，这相当于在 CPU 没有动态提升的情况下的最大负载。只有在压力测试中，我们才观察到短时间内输出功率超过 130 瓦。

不过，这在性能评估中几乎不起作用。3DMarkTime Spy 和 HWiNFO 的测试结果都表明，图形性能并没有进一步提高。在只允许总功耗为 90 W 的标准模式下，GPU 时钟几乎与允许最大功耗时一样高。在链接到的文章中的文章中，我们详细揭示了为什么最大负载对小型 RTX 4050 和 RTX 4060 几乎没有好处。

与其他多媒体笔记本电脑相比，性能基本符合所安装 GPU 的预期。三星三星Galaxy Book3 Ultra配备了 RTX 4050 的性能要差得多。不过微星创造者 Z17在 3DMark 分数上也略逊一筹。在 Blender 中，只有配备更强大的 RTX 4070 的 Creator 笔记本电脑表现更好。

在标准模式下，几乎可以完全发挥图形性能。在静音模式下，电源功率逐渐下降到 20 W 多一点，有限的散热选项导致性能明显下降。

至少在电池模式下，这种情况不会加剧。在其他方面 Witcher 3在最高设置下仍可播放，这就是为什么所有其他图形要求较高的任务也应可执行的原因。

在我们的 GPU 基准列表.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	99.3 pt
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	98.3 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	85.4 pt
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	81.2 pt
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	77.7 pt
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	55.6 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	53.1 pt
Average of class Multimedia	50.1 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	40870 Points +22%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	40331 Points +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (28136 - 38912, n=56)	34832 Points +4%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	33576 Points
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	31483 Points -6%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	24229 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	22469 Points -33%
Average of class Multimedia (3505 - 60250, n=78, last 2 years)	20955 Points -38%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	29801 Points +23%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	28700 Points +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (20533 - 29656, n=53)	25748 Points +6%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	24184 Points
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	23767 Points -2%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	16212 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	16174 Points -33%
Average of class Multimedia (1835 - 46022, n=81, last 2 years)	15047 Points -38%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	11730 Points +25%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	11496 Points +22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (7484 - 11451, n=55)	9936 Points +6%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	9404 Points
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	8955 Points -5%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	6241 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	5859 Points -38%
Average of class Multimedia (622 - 17620, n=82, last 2 years)	5695 Points -39%

3DMark 11 Performance		25913 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		42137 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		20396 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		9947 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Multimedia (19 - 105, n=47, last 2 years)	41.4 Seconds * -59%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	34 Seconds * -31%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	28 Seconds * -8%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	26 Seconds *
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	23 Seconds * +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (19 - 28, n=52)	23 Seconds * +12%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	22 Seconds * +15%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Multimedia (32 - 181, n=48, last 2 years)	72.3 Seconds * -61%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	61 Seconds * -36%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	46 Seconds * -2%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	45 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (39 - 53, n=52)	43.2 Seconds * +4%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	36 Seconds * +20%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	35 Seconds * +22%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Multimedia (160 - 946, n=87, last 2 years)	422 Seconds * -69%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	393 Seconds * -58%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	386 Seconds * -55%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	377 Seconds * -51%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (189 - 452, n=52)	311 Seconds * -25%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	249 Seconds *
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	190 Seconds * +24%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

正如上文所述，由于图形芯片无需完全使用即可获得最佳性能，因此尽管机身纤薄且电源供应有限，VivoBook Pro 16X 在游戏时也表现稳健。在风扇噪音适中的情况下，它大致能赶上宏碁掠夺者 Helios 16游戏笔记本及其相同的 GPU。

因此，玩当前要求较高的游戏也不成问题。如果将分辨率设置为全高清，新款 F1 23 可以流畅地播放最高级别的细节。

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	95.4 pt
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	89.9 pt
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	88.4 pt
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	85.7 pt
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	85.3 pt
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	63.9 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	52.5 pt
Average of class Multimedia	49.7 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	107.1 (95^min, 103^P1) fps +9%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	105.4 (100^min, 100^P1) fps +8%
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	102.1 (95^min, 96^P1) fps +4%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	98 fps
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	90.5 fps -8%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	69.8 (64^min) fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	60.1 (51^min) fps -39%
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=79, last 2 years)	55.1 fps -44%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	123 (8.87^min, 83.3^P1) fps +17%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	118.7 (16.4^min, 76.9^P1) fps +13%
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	112.8 (2.84^min, 76.9^P1) fps +7%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	105.4 (5.19^min, 66.7^P1) fps
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	96.5 (4.91^min, 66.7^P1) fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	65.3 (21.8^min, 35.7^P1) fps -38%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	63.5 (4.22^min, 37^P1) fps -40%
Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 141.6, n=82, last 2 years)	55.1 fps -48%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	114.7 fps +36%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	109 fps +29%
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	100.1 fps +19%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	85.4 fps +1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	84.4 fps
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	66 fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	56.9 fps -33%
Average of class Multimedia (6.53 - 141.8, n=82, last 2 years)	53.2 fps -37%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	196.7 (34.8^min, 146.3^P1) fps +19%
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	185.2 (23^min, 136.7^P1) fps +12%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	165.4 (5^min, 121.3^P1) fps
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	160.6 (97.3^min, 122.1^P1) fps -3%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	142.7 (37.9^min, 70.5^P1) fps -14%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	117.7 (64.5^min, 88.7^P1) fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	103.9 (65^min, 77.7^P1) fps -37%
Average of class Multimedia (11 - 233, n=81, last 2 years)	92.1 fps -44%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	171.6 (147.3^min) fps +4%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	165.2 (140.9^min) fps
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	158.5 (138.4^min) fps -4%
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	153 (129.5^min) fps -7%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	143.8 (126.1^min) fps -13%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	137 (116.5^min) fps -17%
Average of class Multimedia (26.3 - 179.9, n=83, last 2 years)	97.6 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	73.5 (63.9^min) fps -56%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	131.1 fps +20%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	109.7 fps +1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	108.8 fps
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	107.6 fps -1%
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	95.4 fps -12%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	90.6 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	79 fps -27%
Average of class Multimedia (23 - 141.1, n=82, last 2 years)	68.2 fps -37%

The Witcher 3 | Far Cry 5 | Star Wars Jedi Survivor

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	249 fps +38%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	226 fps +26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (110 - 229, n=36)	185.1 fps +3%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	180 fps
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	165.6 fps -8%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	123.9 (119^min) fps -31%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	107.1 (93^min) fps -40%
Average of class Multimedia (11.2 - 290, n=72, last 2 years)	102.2 fps -43%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	107.1 (95^min, 103^P1) fps +9%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	105.4 (100^min, 100^P1) fps +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (77 - 159.7, n=42)	100.4 fps +2%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	98 fps
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	90.5 fps -8%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	69.8 (64^min) fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	60.1 (51^min) fps -39%
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=79, last 2 years)	55.1 fps -44%

Far Cry 5
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	154 fps +19%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	137 fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (104 - 158, n=33)	129.2 fps 0%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	129 (92^min) fps
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	127 fps -2%
Average of class Multimedia (18 - 154, n=59, last 2 years)	74.2 fps -42%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	74 (57^min) fps -43%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	145 fps +18%
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	124 fps +1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	123 (85^min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (95 - 148, n=34)	121.8 fps -1%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	120 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	71 (47^min) fps -42%
Average of class Multimedia (17 - 145, n=59, last 2 years)	69.5 fps -43%

Star Wars Jedi Survivor
1920x1080 High Preset
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	72 fps +22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (50.1 - 77.6, n=8)	64.8 fps +10%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	59 (11^P0.1, 31^P1) fps
Average of class Multimedia (13 - 72, n=10, last 2 years)	42.7 fps -28%
1920x1080 Epic Preset
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	67 fps +22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (45.5 - 66.7, n=10)	58.8 fps +7%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	55 (12^P0.1, 28^P1) fps
Average of class Multimedia (12.3 - 67, n=11, last 2 years)	40.9 fps -26%

在Witcher 3 持久性测试中，华硕 VivoBook Pro 无法保持帧速率。尽管在曲线中可以看到典型的昼夜波动，但总体速率下降了 5%多一点。假设多媒体笔记本很少需要长时间调用最高性能，这似乎不是问题。尤其是 90 多 FPS 的速度仍然非常超值。

Witcher 3 FPS chart

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø95.5 (89-103)

Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø107.1 (95-113)

MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø81 (74-93)

	high	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)	168.3	105.4	82
The Witcher 3 (2015)	180	98
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	181.4	165.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	84.4		65.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	108.8
Far Cry 5 (2018)	129	123	94
Strange Brigade (2018)	199.3	165.4	120.5
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022)		88	61
Star Wars Jedi Survivor (2023)	59	55	36
F1 23 (2023)	168.1	51.7	32.2
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)		72.33	42.41

排放 - 为创作者的笔记本电脑提供大量散热

噪音

我们在最大负载下测得的高音量在实际使用中很难达到。在"标准 "模式下，办公室里几乎所有的东西都会淹没 VivoBook，因为此时风扇的声音只有四分之一。风扇安静时，笔记本基本上听不到声音。然后我们测量了最大可能音量的七分之一。

因此，华硕 VivoBook 可以让你安静地工作，即使你仔细听也能听到风扇的声音。这并不是必然的，例如微星创造者 Z17在安静的环境中，即使是静音模式也会让人感到烦躁。

Noise Level

Idle		26.6 / 26.6 / 29.2 dB(A)
Load		53.4 / 56.9 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.2 dB(A)

	Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47	SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
Noise		20%	10%	8%	2%	-8%
off / environment *	25.2	23.1 8%	25 1%	24.5 3%	25.9 -3%	26 -3%
Idle Minimum *	26.6	23.1 13%	26 2%	24.5 8%	25.9 3%	31.8 -20%
Idle Average *	26.6	23.1 13%	27 -2%	24.5 8%	25.9 3%	31.8 -20%
Idle Maximum *	29.2	24.2 17%	28 4%	24.5 16%	32 -10%	31.8 -9%
Load Average *	53.4	27.1 49%	40 25%	47.6 11%	47.2 12%	53.9 -1%
Load Maximum *	56.9	44.6 22%	41 28%	56.7 -0%	53.1 7%	54.9 4%
Witcher 3 ultra *		40.1	39	55.9	53.1	53.9

* ... smaller is better

温度

在压力测试中，触摸板的发热温度高达 34 °C。我们还在底部测得 60 °C。在这种特殊情况下，相对较薄的机身肯定会过热。

Witcher 3 耐用性测试模拟了更为真实的负载。掌托温度保持在 30 °C以下，底部温度最高达到 47 °C。虽然 VivoBook 应始终放在坚固的表面上，但即使对硬件的要求很高，它也不会太热。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


37.4 °C	35.7 °C	29.1 °C
35.9 °C	39.7 °C	35.3 °C
30.3 °C	33.8 °C	28 °C

Maximum: 39.7 °C
Average: 33.9 °C


53.7 °C	60 °C	38.6 °C
44.3 °C	52.2 °C	36.8 °C
26.3 °C	31 °C	27.2 °C

Maximum: 60 °C
Average: 41.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 53.9 °C | Room Temperature 23 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


30.4 °C	30.9 °C	29.1 °C
29.6 °C	28.8 °C	29.1 °C
24.3 °C	27 °C	24.7 °C

Maximum: 30.9 °C
Average: 28.2 °C


32.2 °C	34.7 °C	29.9 °C
33.2 °C	33.2 °C	31.9 °C
26.9 °C	26.6 °C	25.6 °C

Maximum: 34.7 °C
Average: 30.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 30.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.1 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


35.9 °C	34.3 °C	27 °C
29.1 °C	35.6 °C	32.4 °C
25.9 °C	28.5 °C	28.2 °C

Maximum: 35.9 °C
Average: 30.8 °C


47.1 °C	44.4 °C	42.7 °C
40.4 °C	43.4 °C	34 °C
27.9 °C	26 °C	24.6 °C

Maximum: 47.1 °C
Average: 36.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 53.7 °C | Room Temperature 22.9 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60 °C / 140 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.8 °C / 92.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-5 °C / -9 F).

	Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat		2%	19%	1%	7%	-13%
Maximum Upper Side *	39.7	45.6 -15%	41 -3%	44.1 -11%	46.7 -18%	63.9 -61%
Maximum Bottom *	60	42 30%	44 27%	48 20%	54.1 10%	68 -13%
Idle Upper Side *	30.9	34.4 -11%	23 26%	32.7 -6%	26.5 14%	28.3 8%
Idle Bottom *	34.7	33.2 4%	26 25%	34.9 -1%	26.8 23%	30.2 13%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

在风扇功率最大、负载最大的情况下，CPU 的温度几乎升至 100 °C，GPU 的温度也超过 90 °C。因此，处理器尤其需要快速节流。大约 2 分钟后，其时钟频率稳定在 2.0 GHz。

与此同时，图形芯片可以继续以最大时钟频率工作，但偶尔也需要从 2.4 GHz 降至 2.0 GHz。

发言人

扬声器无法发出低音和中低音，这对于笔记本电脑来说不足为奇。另一方面，对声音重现非常重要的中音和高音却很扎实。

因此，低音不太重的音乐听起来也不错。播放的精确度还可以再好一些，因为你可以听到 MP3 音质以上的音乐中缺少了某些元素。不过，这只是微不足道的批评。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - Vivobook 中饥饿的 i9

耗电量

最重要的是，性能极强的i9-13980HX 在无负载的情况下功耗会增加。我们测得的平均功耗为 16 W。相比之下，三星Galaxy Book3 Ultra i7-13700H 处理器的功耗并不差，其显示屏也是 16 英寸 OLED，功耗为 5 W。因此，VivoBook 在执行简单任务时效率并不高。

最大功耗达到 244 W，但只是非常短暂。通常的负载约为 150 瓦，因此 240 瓦的电源大小适中。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.8 / 0.3 Watt
Idle	13.8 / 16 / 19 Watt
Load	147 / 244 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"	Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.6"	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16"	Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"	SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS, 2560x1600, 17"	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Average of class Multimedia
Power Consumption		6%	58%	-8%	29%	-75%	12%	41%
Idle Minimum *	13.8	20 -45%	3 78%	12.8 7%	8.6 38%	34.6 -151%	11.6 ?(3 - 33, n=47) 16%	6.84 ?(2.1 - 31.3, n=87, last 2 years) 50%
Idle Average *	16	20.7 -29%	5 69%	19.9 -24%	12 25%	43 -169%	16.1 ?(6.9 - 35, n=47) -1%	11.6 ?(4.6 - 38.3, n=87, last 2 years) 27%
Idle Maximum *	19	22.4 -18%	11 42%	20.3 -7%	12.4 35%	44.9 -136%	20.4 ?(7.6 - 45, n=47) -7%	13.7 ?(5.6 - 41.6, n=87, last 2 years) 28%
Load Average *	147	77.1 48%	72 51%	131.4 11%	80 46%	145 1%	93.1 ?(59 - 190, n=46) 37%	71.9 ?(15.1 - 147, n=85, last 2 years) 51%
Witcher 3 ultra *	147.8	95.4 35%	69.7 53%	196.5 -33%	147.7 -0%	152.4 -3%
Load Maximum *	244	133.4 45%	108 56%	246.8 -1%	173.1 29%	220 10%	210 ?(99 - 364, n=47) 14%	118.5 ?(47.7 - 270, n=87, last 2 years) 51%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø147.8 (144.8-151.5)

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø230 (196.8-245)

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø15.2 (4.02-27.7)

Power consumption with an external monitor

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø170.9 (44.2-234)

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø210 (115.7-230)

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø163.3 (154.8-190.8)

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø140.4 (133.2-144.3)

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø20.2 (12.3-38.9)

电池寿命

VivoBook 只能从 90 Wh 的大容量电池中获得短暂的运行时间，这主要是由于 13.8 W 的高耗电量（无负载）造成的。从纯数学的角度来看，这应该导致 6.5 小时的最长运行时间，而这实际上是在降低亮度的情况下上网时实现的。

在暗光模式下浏览网页可额外延长四分之三小时，但网站背景必须始终为黑色。在飞行模式下播放视频也只能维持不到 5 小时。

如果采用更高效的处理器和更适中的整体设置，时间会更长。例如三星Galaxy Book3 Ultra及其较小的电池可以播放 13 个小时的视频，在我们的网上冲浪测试中可以使用近 10 个小时。

华硕宣传称，30 分钟后电池可充电 50%，这在我们的测试中得到了证实。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		6h 30min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		5h 19min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 28min

	Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh	Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Average of class Multimedia
Battery Runtime		12%	73%	-9%	18%	13%	80%
H.264	319		803 152%	358 12%	470 47%	329 3%	847 ?(319 - 1481, n=53, last 2 years) 166%
WiFi v1.3	390	481 23%	576 48%	334 -14%	467 20%	332 -15%	636 ?(262 - 1204, n=87, last 2 years) 63%
Load	88	89 1%	106 20%	65 -26%	77 -12%	132 50%	96.4 ?(39 - 212, n=64, last 2 years) 10%

Pros

+ 非常出色的 OLED 显示屏

+ 极其强大的 CPU

+ 带华硕拨号盘的触摸板

+ 两个雷电 4 端口

+ 风扇几乎始终保持静音

Cons

- 外壳可以更坚固

- 电池寿命短

- 键盘边框受压会变形

评价 - 略显基本，但速度极快

华硕 Vivobook Pro 16X K6604 评测。测试机由华硕德国公司提供。

华硕 VivoBook Pro 16X 配备了色彩精准的 600 万像素 OLED 显示屏、调整良好的 RTX 4060 和极其强劲的 i9-13980HX，为一款雄心勃勃的多媒体笔记本提供了完美的品质。此外，相对紧凑的机身散热效果也很扎实，在标准设置下不会造成困扰，而在静音模式下几乎察觉不到。

也许没有那么豪华，但在核心竞争力方面肯定与华硕 Studiobook 高级型号不相上下。

此外还有控制盘，它不是实体存在的，而是集成在触摸板中。华硕 ProArt "软件的基本功能和附加程序极大地扩展了操作选项。在连接性方面也没有任何缺陷。

与昂贵得多的华硕 ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED的不同之处在于屏幕和性能值。机箱的结构不是很牢固，这也对键盘造成了负面影响。此外，在极端情况下，散热效果也不尽如人意，但其实不必如此。因此，从实用的角度来看，VivoBook Pro 16X 是更可取的选择。

三星三星Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16虽然速度稍逊一筹，但却拥有更强的续航能力和更薄的机身。

价格和供应情况

在美国，华硕 Vivobook Pro 16X 有多种配置。例如，亚马逊提供的最强配置（英特尔酷睿 i9-13980HX CPU、RTX 4070 GPU、32GB 内存、1TB 固态硬盘）折扣价为 1994.99 美元。百思买（Best Buy）提供了一个相同的型号，但只有 16GB 内存，售价为 1999.99 美元。如果将 RTX 4070 换成 RTX 4060，则另一个型号的价格为 1799.99 美元。

价格截至 2023 年 7 月 26 日，可能会有变动。

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W - 07/25/2023 v7 ^(old)
Mario Petzold

Chassis

78 / 98 → 79%

Keyboard

91%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

74 / 80 → 92%

Weight

62 / 20-72 → 82%

Battery

67 / 95 → 70%

Display

81%

Games Performance

97 / 90 → 100%

Application Performance

91 / 90 → 100%

Temperature

88%

Noise

76 / 95 → 80%

Audio

84%

Camera

42 / 85 → 50%

Average

79%

86%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 1459 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 473355 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕 Vivobook Pro 16X 评测：配备出色处理器的创意笔记本

Mario Petzold, 2023-07-26 (Update: 2023-07-26)

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - Vivobook 上的塑料太多了

尺寸比较

设备 - 包括所有重要设备和两个 TB4

SD 读卡器

交流

网络摄像头

维护

保修

输入设备 - 带实用表盘的 Vivobook

键盘

触摸板

显示屏 - 色彩丰富的 OLED 无触摸屏

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - VivoBook 的最高工作速度

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

系统性能

DPC 延迟

存储设备

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

Witcher 3 FPS chart

排放 - 为创作者的笔记本电脑提供大量散热

噪音

温度

压力测试

发言人

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W audio analysis

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

电源管理 - Vivobook 中饥饿的 i9

耗电量

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Power consumption with an external monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

评价 - 略显基本，但速度极快

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison