Notebookcheck Logo

联想Legion Pro 7 16笔记本电脑回顾：得益于RTX 4090的全面游戏能力

昂贵的高端乐趣。

Legion Pro 7的顶级型号是为最大性能而设计的。酷睿i9-13900HX和GeForce RTX 4090承诺在内部WQXGA显示器上的流畅帧率，即使在要求很高的游戏中。我们把16英寸的设备通过我们的测试课程。
Gaming Geforce Intel Raptor Lake Laptop / Notebook
联想Legion Pro 7 16

这款Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H不仅是最强大的，也是最昂贵的游戏笔记本之一。目前，你必须支付至少4,500欧元的组合，以获得 酷睿i9-13900HX, GeForce RTX 4090, 32GB内存（2x 16GB DDR5-5600），2TB大容量存储（2x 1TB NVMe SSD）和240Hz显示屏（2660 x 1600像素）。每个玩家都必须决定他是否要支持制造商目前的价格政策，这似乎与任何通货膨胀无关。

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 (Legion Pro 7 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-13900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.4 GHz, 185 W PL2 / Short Burst, 130 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Core: 1455 MHz, RAM: 2250 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, ForceWare 535.98, MUX-Switch
Memory
32 GB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR5-5600 Dual-Channel, two slots (both in use)
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, MNG007DA2-3 (CSO1628), IPS, G-Sync, X-Rite Pantone, glossy: no, HDR, 240 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB 
, 2x NVMe-SSD, two M.2-2280-slots (both in use)
Soundcard
Intel Raptor Point-S PCH - HD Audio (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 1 Combindes (Headset/Mic)
Networking
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 26 x 363 x 262
Battery
99.9 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: FHD 1080p
Additional features
Speakers: Harman 2x 2 W, Keyboard: Chiclet RGB, Keyboard Light: yes, 330 W Power Supply, Lenovo Vantage, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.683 kg, Power Supply: 827 g
Price
4500 EUR
Links
Lenovo homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Legion Pro 7的竞争者包括其他16和17英寸范围内的RTX 4090高端玩家，如 Razer Blade 16，以及 XMG Neo 16，以及 华硕Strix Scar 17和 MSI Titan GT77.更加便宜的姐妹型号，配备 RTX 4080也出现在表格中作为对比设备。

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
88.8 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU		2.7 kg26 mm16.00"2560x1600
from EUR 4500
89.8 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU		2.5 kg21.99 mm16.00"3840x2400
Alternative specs USD 3,099.00
88.3 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96
R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU		2.9 kg28.3 mm17.30"2560x1440
87.7 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU		2.5 kg29.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
from EUR 4300
89 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2023
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU		3.5 kg23 mm17.30"3840x2160
Alternative specs USD 3,495.00
89.4 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2023
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU		2.7 kg26 mm16.00"2560x1600
from EUR 3999

由于这款机箱在结构上与已经测试过的变体相同，我们在这篇文章中不会再讨论关于机箱、端口和输入设备的细节。你可以在下面的评论中找到相应的信息 链接的评论.

联想Legion Pro 7
联想Legion Pro 7
联想Legion Pro 7
联想Legion Pro 7
联想Legion Pro 7
联想Legion Pro 7
联想Legion Pro 7
联想Legion Pro 7
联想Legion Pro 7
联想Legion Pro 7
联想Legion Pro 7
联想Legion Pro 7

尺寸比较

❌
395 mm 282 mm 28.3 mm 2.9 kg397 mm 330 mm 23 mm 3.5 kg363 mm 262 mm 26 mm 2.7 kg363 mm 262 mm 26 mm 2.7 kg357 mm 268 mm 29.9 mm 2.5 kg355 mm 244 mm 21.99 mm 2.5 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

沟通

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1635 (1528min - 1715max) MBit/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1585 (642min - 1670max) MBit/s +1%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1582 (1517min, 1518.74P1 - 1636max) MBit/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1579 (848min - 1696max) MBit/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1577 (1115min - 1713max) MBit/s
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
  (942 - 1622, n=26)
1358 MBit/s -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=123, last 2 years)
1201 MBit/s -24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
952 (498min - 998max) MBit/s -40%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1733 (1700min - 1761max) MBit/s +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1668 (846min - 1705max) MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1665 (839min - 1716max) MBit/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1619 (1537min - 1665max) MBit/s -3%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1545 (1508min, 1510.9P1 - 1569max) MBit/s -7%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
  (872 - 1714, n=28)
1473 MBit/s -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1744, n=123, last 2 years)
1386 MBit/s -17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1219 (968min - 1458max) MBit/s -27%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1577 (1115-1713)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1635 (1528-1715)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø936 (498-998)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1564 (642-1670)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1582 (1517-1636)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1551 (848-1696)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1639 (846-1705)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1733 (1700-1761)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1218 (968-1458)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1637 (839-1716)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1545 (1508-1569)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1618 (1537-1665)

网络摄像头

ColorChecker
6.9 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
6 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
8 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090: 8.17 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 11.21 ∆E

显示

除了外壳，显示屏也与4080版本相同。 这是一个好消息，因为我们上次测试证实，WQXGA屏幕几乎在各方面都令人印象深刻。

494
cd/m²		463
cd/m²		462
cd/m²
492
cd/m²		491
cd/m²		467
cd/m²
478
cd/m²		452
cd/m²		452
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
MNG007DA2-3 (CSO1628) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 494 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 472.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 491 cd/m²
Contrast: 1228:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.88, calibrated: 0.97
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
71.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.211
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
MNG007DA2-3 (CSO1628), IPS, 2560x1600, 16"		Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090
AUO B160ZAN01.U, mini-LED, 3840x2400, 16"		Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96
NE173QHM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"		SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
BOE0AF0 NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"		MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
B173ZAN06.C, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.3"		Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
MNG007DA2-3 (CSO1628), IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Display
24%
20%
-3%
22%
-1%
Display P3 Coverage
69.5
99.9
44%
98
41%
67.3
-3%
94.9
37%
69.1
-1%
sRGB Coverage
99.8
100
0%
100
0%
96.7
-3%
99.9
0%
99.7
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
71.6
90.9
27%
85.6
20%
68.9
-4%
92.4
29%
71.2
-1%
Response Times
-622%
-53%
-60%
-365%
-21%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
10.9 ?(5.1, 5.8)
10.2 ?(5.8, 4.4)
6%
6.2 ?(2.8, 3.4)
43%
14.5 ?(7.1, 7.4)
-33%
38.4 ?(13.6, 24.8, n)
-252%
12.3 ?(5.7, 6.6)
-13%
Response Time Black / White *
4.6 ?(1.6, 3)
62.04 ?(58.04, 4)
-1249%
11.4 ?(5.9, 5.5)
-148%
8.6 ?(3.9, 4.7)
-87%
26.6 ?(9.2, 17.4, n)
-478%
5.9 ?(2.2, 3.7)
-28%
PWM Frequency
2420 ?(100)
2380 ?(100)
Screen
1412%
11%
-5%
54786%
21%
Brightness middle
491
730
49%
322.5
-34%
372
-24%
606
23%
511
4%
Brightness
472
729
54%
317
-33%
349
-26%
602
28%
469
-1%
Brightness Distribution
91
94
3%
86
-5%
88
-3%
93
2%
86
-5%
Black Level *
0.4
0.0045
99%
0.29
27%
0.32
20%
0.0001
100%
0.4
-0%
Contrast
1228
162222
13110%
1112
-9%
1163
-5%
6060000
493385%
1278
4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.6
5.65
-253%
1.15
28%
2.06
-29%
4.8
-200%
0.95
41%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.15
10.11
-96%
3.03
41%
3
42%
8.2
-59%
2.07
60%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.97
1.85
-91%
0.56
42%
1.5
-55%
1.8
-86%
0.91
6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3
8.1
-170%
1.7
43%
1.9
37%
6.5
-117%
0.6
80%
Gamma
2.211 100%
1.98 111%
2.27 97%
2.312 95%
2.63 84%
2.176 101%
CCT
6979 93%
5874 111%
6299 103%
6747 96%
6596 99%
6545 99%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
271% / 824%
-7% / 4%
-23% / -12%
18148% / 35172%
-0% / 10%

* ... smaller is better

不管是亮度（~470 cd/m²）、对比度（~1,230:1）还是色彩准确性（平均DeltaE 1.6）：测得的数值对IPS面板来说是非常公正的。响应时间也是令人满意的，这主要归功于240赫兹的刷新率。在色彩空间方面还有改进的余地。虽然100%的sRGB对于游戏笔记本来说已经足够了，但对于专业用户来说，大约72%的AdobeRGB覆盖率和70%的DCI-P3都有点差。其他竞争者在这里提供更多（见表）。

卡尔曼：灰度
卡尔曼：灰度
卡尔曼：色彩饱和度
卡尔曼：色彩饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN：灰度（校准的）。
CalMAN：灰度（校准的）。
CalMAN：色彩饱和度（已校准）。
CalMAN：色彩饱和度（已校准）。
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)

总的来说，该显示屏给人留下了良好到非常好的印象，尽管它在技术上还达不到像Razer Blade 16和MSI Titan GT 77那样的迷你LED面板的水平。

Legion Pro 7 16与sRGB对比
Legion Pro 7 16与sRGB对比
Legion Pro 7 16 VS AdobeRGB
Legion Pro 7 16 VS AdobeRGB
Legion Pro 7 16 VS P3
Legion Pro 7 16 VS P3

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
4.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.1 ms rise
↘ 5.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8529 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

业绩

Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H在价格和性能方面处于绝对上风。这款16英寸的笔记本提供了足够的储备，为未来几年的新游戏做好了准备。虽然CPU和GPU是焊接的（这在现代笔记本电脑中很常见），但如果需要，工作内存和大容量存储可以被替换。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
 
 

测试条件

预装的联想Vantage软件包含许多定制系统的选项。热量模式和可选的混合模式尤其相关。除了电池测量（平衡与图形切换）之外，我们所有的测试都是在性能模式下进行的，并有一个永久激活的dGPU。

静音模式 平衡模式 性能模式
CPU PL1 (HWiNFO) 55 W 80 W 130 W
CPU PL2 (HWiNFO) 65 W 119 W 185 W
噪音 (Witcher 3 @FHD/Ultra) ~37 dB(A) ~47 dB(A) ~53 dB(A)
性能 (Witcher 3 @FHD/Ultra) 40 FPS (锁定) ~160 FPS ~200 FPS

处理器

正如预期的那样， 酷睿i9-13900HX提供了与RTX 4080型号非常相似的性能。猛禽湖芯片的性能在较长时间内也相当稳定（见Cinebench循环）。一般来说，CPU的性能略高于迄今为止确定的13900HX的平均水平。英特尔将8个带超线程的性能核心和16个不带超线程的效率核心结合起来，这意味着总共有32个平行线程。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

02805608401120140016801960224025202800308033603640392042004480476050405320Tooltip
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4469 (4358.72-4684.94)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø3945 (3056-4339.34)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX: Ø5466 (5355.47-5521.05)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4121 (3925.8-4598.23)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4980 (4889.98-5226.71)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4574 (4429.68-4819.28)
CPU Performance Rating | Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
82.6 pt
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX
79.6 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
77.5 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX
77.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX
77.3 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
 
73.9 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13950HX
70.4 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
58.9 pt

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
4685 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
281 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
289 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
11637 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
780 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
2039 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
31109 Points
Help
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
95.1 pt
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
66.3 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
64.8 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
64.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
63.3 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
 
60.8 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
59.8 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
51 pt

系统性能

系统功率也处于非常高的水平：PCMark 10中的8158分比RTX 4080模型的结果高出几个百分点。相比之下，DDR5工作内存的基准测试结果也令人印象深刻。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8884 Points +9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
8733 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (7690 - 9331, n=8)
8466 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
8374 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8158 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7830 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=133, last 2 years)
7813 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7597 Points -7%
PCMark 10 Score
8158 points
Help
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78494 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78367 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
77544 MB/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
77217 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (67716 - 78835, n=21)
75033 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=147, last 2 years)
65798 MB/s -16%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
63863 MB/s -19%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
48997 MB/s -37%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

测试配置在延迟方面的表现不尽如人意。根据LatencyMon工具，由于数值极高，16-incher在其交付状态下不适合进行实时音频和视频编辑。有趣的是，RTX 4080版本的延迟明显更低。

延迟监测
延迟监测
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10673.4 μs *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
5340 μs * +50%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4710.9 μs * +56%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2194.8 μs * +79%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
437.7 μs * +96%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储

联想没有安装更大的固态硬盘，而是简单地使用了便宜的Legion 型号的两个1-TB的固态硬盘，完全占据了M.2插槽。流行的三星PM9A1取得了非常好的效果，但在较长时间的负载中经常要处理较强的波动或下降--如Pro 7的情况。然而，这种现象也影响到其他制造商的NVMe SSD（见图）。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6903 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5082 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 741.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 652.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 4430 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 4223 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 91.26 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 244.3 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
81.7 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
75.2 pt
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
71.5 pt
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
 
65.3 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
63.5 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
63.2 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
56.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
49.6 pt

* ... smaller is better

Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036072010801440180021602520288032403600396043204680504054005760612064806840Tooltip
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø5657 (3268.83-6325.5)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024: Ø5873 (3380.14-6883.48)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N: Ø6460 (3457.36-7156.11)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8: Ø6442 (5614.61-6552.24)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø5697 (3283.58-6647.05)

图形卡

的 GeForce RTX 4090是目前最快的移动游戏显卡。来自Nvidia的Ada-Lovelace一代的顶级型号配备了9,728个着色器和16GB GDDR6内存。当涉及到合成基准时，Legion Pro 7在RTX 4090的竞争中排名居中，它也依靠175瓦的最大TGP（包括动态提升）。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
97.2 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
96.9 pt
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
96.8 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
 
91.3 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
90.8 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
88.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
82.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
58.1 pt
3DMark 11 Performance
44779 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
34742 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
20039 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (10 - 95, n=142, last 2 years)
21.5 Seconds * -79%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
15 Seconds * -25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
13 Seconds * -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (9 - 19, n=39)
12.1 Seconds * -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
12 Seconds *
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
11 Seconds * +8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
11 Seconds * +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
11 Seconds * +8%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=145, last 2 years)
37.4 Seconds * -108%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
23 Seconds * -28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (16 - 24, n=39)
18.3 Seconds * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
18 Seconds * -0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
18 Seconds *
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
17 Seconds * +6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
17 Seconds * +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
17 Seconds * +6%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

16英寸的显示器在游戏测试中尤其发挥了它的力量。目前的游戏在原生分辨率下运行流畅（我们的QHD基准测试是以2,560 x 1,440而不是2,560 x 1,600像素创建的），即使在最大的细节下，也几乎总是能达到60 FPS以上。即使在4K显示器上，完全设置通常也不会有问题--即使没有DLSS或帧生成的帮助。

Performance Rating | The Witcher 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
99.1 pt
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
97.5 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
96.2 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
 
94 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
90.9 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86.5 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 -1!
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
80.9 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
68.1 pt
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 | A Plague Tale Requiem | The Witcher 3 v4.00 | Spider-Man Miles Morales | F1 22
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022
3840x2160 Extreme Quality Preset AA:T2X Filmic SM
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
85 fps +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
82 (39min) fps 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
82 (38min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (63 - 86, n=12)
78.8 fps -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
75 (35min) fps -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (41 - 83, n=9, last 2 years)
67.8 fps -17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
67 (32min) fps -18%
2560x1440 Extreme Quality Preset AA:T2X Filmic SM
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
135 fps +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
135 (69min) fps +2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
132 (67min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (104 - 137, n=14)
126.8 fps -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
122 (61min) fps -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
104 (58min) fps -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (47 - 136, n=15, last 2 years)
96.3 fps -27%

像往常一样，我们测试了GPU的性能是否在较长的负载下保持不变，用 的方式进行测试。Witcher 3.与竞争对手类似，除了轻微的波动外，我们没有注意到任何性能下降或类似情况。

Witcher 3 FPS-Diagramm

0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø196 (185-206)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø189.7 (166-213)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96 R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø196.8 (185-211)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø205 (192-219)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø198.9 (190-214)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø176.1 (159-182)
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 186.3 186.9 184.9 143.6 137.7 173.6
The Witcher 3 (2015) 200
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 230 204 193.9 182.1 175.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 223 212 181.2 154 91.7
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 201 177.7 136.4 111.7
Strange Brigade (2018) 439 369 359 347 302 158.4
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 185 120
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) 100.93 50.05
F1 22 (2022) 301 303 279 129.2 85.2 45.9
A Plague Tale Requiem (2022) 77.2 43.8
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) 132 82
Spider-Man Miles Morales (2022) 108.1 80
The Witcher 3 v4.00 (2023) 101.2 48.7
The Last of Us (2023) 85.8 45.7

排放

噪声排放

如此强大的高端组件的最大缺点是噪音的发展，这一点不足为奇。在性能模式下，16英寸处理器在3D应用中的噪音在48 dB(A)（平均3DMark 06）和55 dB(A)（最大压力测试）之间。在游戏中，你可以期待大约53 dB(A)，如果不戴耳机，这也是非常令人不快的。闲置时的情况要轻松得多。虽然风扇偶尔会有点响（例如在开机时），但平均28至30分贝（A）是可以接受的，特别是因为如果需要的话，可以使用静音或平衡模式。

Noise Level

Idle
28 / 30 / 38 dB(A)
Load
48 / 55 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.637.842.142.138.8412537.637.639.538.137.435.53143.645.847.84446.342.54035.336.633.432.333.532.45040.236.237.337.837.839.66334.42527.523.824.435.68023.520.319.518.118.742.610024.81921.119.620.225.712523.61820.417.317.726.316026.519.325.519.9192820030.723.426.822.223.129.225028.620.123.618.718.530.531528.717.223.617.615.532.440030.819.625.818.514.734.750034.820.82923.114.139.863036.52128.918.513.340.980038.121.329.318.412.743.2100037.519.727.816.112.742.7125038.918.630.115.71344.716003917.627.714.812.445200037.716.625.41412.643.8250037.61625.714.513.244.3315035.714.622.513.613.542.4400037.114.823.514.113.345500034.714.820.614.313.842.7630033.914.619.81413.642.780003014.216.513.913.639.21000027.114.115.513.613.537.11250023.113.615.313.613.133.51600019.913.114.213.112.527.6SPL48.529.63828.125.855N6.41.22.810.710median 33.9median 17.6median 23.6median 15.7median 13.5median 39.8Delta5.52.63.82.426.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU		Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU		Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96
R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU		SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU		MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU		Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Noise
18%
14%
-10%
1%
4%
off / environment *
25
20.84
17%
22.7
9%
25
-0%
24.6
2%
24
4%
Idle Minimum *
28
23.65
16%
23.5
16%
31
-11%
29.2
-4%
26
7%
Idle Average *
30
23.65
21%
27.7
8%
33
-10%
29.2
3%
28
7%
Idle Maximum *
38
23.65
38%
27.7
27%
42
-11%
29.2
23%
34
11%
Load Average *
48
43.35
10%
30.5
36%
58
-21%
50.7
-6%
47
2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
53
46.7
12%
51.4
3%
57
-8%
53.3
-1%
55
-4%
Load Maximum *
55
46.72
15%
54.1
2%
59
-7%
61
-11%
56
-2%

* ... smaller is better

温度

该机箱的温度比竞争对手高，顶部最高为53℃，底部最高为59℃。在闲置模式下，温度的发展仍然在限制范围内。例如，掌托的温度达到29°C左右，这是一个适度的速度。

Max. Load
 49 °C53 °C49 °C 
 48 °C50 °C50 °C 
 36 °C44 °C45 °C 
Maximum: 53 °C
Average: 47.1 °C
56 °C59 °C52 °C
54 °C56 °C44 °C
43 °C42 °C37 °C
Maximum: 59 °C
Average: 49.2 °C
Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 47.1 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-16.1 °C / -29 F).
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU		Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU		Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU		SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU		MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU		Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Heat
7%
25%
14%
20%
1%
Maximum Upper Side *
53
52
2%
34.6
35%
50
6%
40.6
23%
48
9%
Maximum Bottom *
59
47.6
19%
35.6
40%
51
14%
41.1
30%
49
17%
Idle Upper Side *
34
33
3%
27.2
20%
28
18%
26.2
23%
40
-18%
Idle Bottom *
32
30.6
4%
30
6%
26
19%
30.3
5%
33
-3%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

在使用FurMark和Prime95工具进行的压力测试中没有问题。虽然CPU的温度超过了90℃，但它并没有低于基本时钟的速度。GPU（约80°C）的表现与此类似。

压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3

演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.835.62537.4383146.349.44033.538.85037.838.46324.434.78018.744.110020.252.912517.7611601961.720023.161.725018.562.631515.565.540014.769.950014.171.463013.37580012.771.9100012.769.112501368160012.472.4200012.673.2250013.270315013.566.3400013.362.9500013.862.6630013.666.5800013.666.71000013.566.71250013.164.51600012.563.3SPL25.881.7N0.755median 13.5median 66.5Delta23.914.411.71211.112.38.317.816.113.910.616.315.518.318.818.228.318.436.512.945.314.954.114.160.714.763.814.267.511.169.89.46913.967.911.364963.99.660.77.260.44.860.14.861.54.459.84.453.64.655.64.453.93.855.63.854.93.652.120.8750.336.2median 9.4median 60.15.34.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电源管理

消耗功率

即使一些对手的消耗更少，但对于RTX 4090设备来说，其功耗是典型的。虽然我们在空闲模式下测得20至35瓦，但在负载下却在136至320瓦之间。因此，附带的330瓦电源的尺寸是足够的。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 /  Watt
Idledarkmidlight 20 / 25 / 35 Watt
Load midlight 136 / 320 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU		Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU		Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96
R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU		SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU		MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU		Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-11%
8%
14%
10%
6%
26%
Idle Minimum *
20
27.5
-38%
14.5
27%
8
60%
14
30%
18
10%
13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=125, last 2 years)
32%
Idle Average *
25
34.4
-38%
21.1
16%
18
28%
21.6
14%
24
4%
18.8 ?(8 - 55.6, n=125, last 2 years)
25%
Idle Maximum *
35
35.4
-1%
42.8
-22%
28
20%
24.8
29%
32
9%
26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=125, last 2 years)
24%
Load Average *
136
147.8
-9%
116.7
14%
133
2%
122.5
10%
130
4%
103.1 ?(32.1 - 201, n=123, last 2 years)
24%
Witcher 3 ultra *
282
256
9%
278
1%
294
-4%
265
6%
260
8%
Load Maximum *
320
286.7
10%
279.6
13%
399
-25%
418
-31%
320
-0%
245 ?(64.5 - 395, n=125, last 2 years)
23%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest

020406080100120140160180200220240260280300Tooltip
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø282 (186.2-315)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø232 (206-295)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø25.2 (20.3-35.1)

Power consumption external monitor

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255270285Tooltip
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø197.1 (174.7-228)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø220 (215-224)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø126.7 (122.9-136.6)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø277 (257-293)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø19.6 (13.5-26.8)

电池寿命

Legion Pro 7的电池寿命既不坏也不特别好。这款16英寸的产品在显示亮度降低到150cd/m²的情况下，在我们的实际WLAN测试中，可以维持5小时左右。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
5h 08min
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh		Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh		Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PY-XS96
R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh		SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh		MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh		Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
12%
-19%
30%
4%
-2%
25%
WiFi v1.3
308
345.5
12%
248
-19%
399
30%
319
4%
303
-2%
384 ?(85 - 889, n=125, last 2 years)
25%
H.264
503
349
358
444 ?(129 - 884, n=59, last 2 years)
Witcher 3 ultra
95
84
74.7 ?(47 - 151, n=9, last 2 years)
Load
81
86
124
84.9 ?(41 - 164, n=88, last 2 years)
Reader / Idle
385
580 ?(239 - 1290, n=53, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 稳定、高质量的外壳
+ 令人信服的240赫兹显示
+ 一流的性能
+ 良好的输入设备
+ 连接性强
+ 好声音

Cons

- 可以变得非常响亮
- 部分固态硬盘的节流
- 高延迟

判决书

联想Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H：测试设备由联想德国提供
联想Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H：测试设备由联想德国提供

那些能够接受至少4500欧元的高昂价格的人将在Legion Pro 7中找到一个几乎彻底成功的16英寸格式的高端游戏机。

联想不仅依靠稳定和高质量的外观机箱，而且还依靠良好的输入设备。连接性（包括Thunderbolt 4）和WQXGA显示屏也会让大多数买家满意。16:10屏幕（240赫兹）除其他外，提供了良好的亮度，令人信服的色彩准确性，以及IPS标准的短响应时间。

在消极方面，我们会有--不幸的是，高端笔记本很常见--负载下的温度和噪音发展非常高。如果没有耳机，性能模式是没有乐趣的。我们建议在这里使用静音或平衡模式。

总的来说，带有RTX 4090 的Legion Pro 7--像RTX 4080型号 --仍然得到非常好的评价，因此属于市场上最好的高端笔记本电脑。

如果你希望它更安静和/或更轻，你应该看看 刀锋16.这个来自Razer的竞争对手在测试中的得分甚至略高。

价格和可用性

Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H（配备酷睿i9-13900HX和WQXGA显示屏）可在美国亚马逊或Bestbuy等各种网上商店购买。

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 - 06/16/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser

Chassis
85 / 98 → 86%
Keyboard
87%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
68 / 80 → 85%
Weight
59 / 10-66 → 87%
Battery
64 / 95 → 68%
Display
92%
Games Performance
100%
Application Performance
98%
Temperature
72 / 95 → 76%
Noise
64 / 90 → 71%
Audio
90%
Camera
47 / 85 → 55%
Average
78%
89%
Gaming - Weighted Average

More articles related to this device

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 (Legion Pro 7 Series)
Review
•
联想Legion Pro 7 16 (2024) 评测：RT...
|
Review
•
联想Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H评论。高端的RT...

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

from EUR 4300
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想Legion Pro 7 16笔记本电脑回顾：得益于RTX 4090的全面游戏能力
Florian Glaser, 2023-06-22 (Update: 2023-06-22)