申科XMG Neo 15游戏笔记本电脑评测。带有液体冷却端口的Ryzen 6000
基于英特尔的 我们在7月份审查的基于英特尔的Neo 15是一款不寻常的笔记本电脑,它具有连接可选的OASIS冷却系统(单独出售,价格约为199欧元,或198美元),我们也在同一时间进行了测试。
XMG现在已经推出了一个新的Neo 15型号,配备了最新的AMD Ryzen处理器。改用AMD CPU也带来了端口选择等方面的一些其他变化。
那么,与基于英特尔的机型相比,基于AMD的Neo的性能如何?在这篇评论中,我们将测试配备价格稍高的RTX 3070 Ti的变体(其价格仍为2850欧元,或2826美元),并看看硬件变化对笔记本电脑的性能和排放意味着什么。
除了仅仅比较基于AMD和英特尔的Neo 15,我们还将把评测机型与其他配备RTX 3070 Ti的游戏笔记本进行对比,例如 MSI Raider GE67, 华硕ROG Strix Scar 15, Acer Nitro 5和 MSI Stealth GS66.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 26.6 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
88.4 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 26.6 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
87.7 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | MSI GE67 HX 12UGS i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 23.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 27.2 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
84 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 26.8 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
84.5 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2022 | MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.2 kg | 19.8 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 坚固的键盘甲板,(过于)柔软的下层外壳
对于一台游戏笔记本电脑来说,Neo 15并没有过于华丽的设计。在大多数情况下,其颜色方案从普通的深灰色到黑色不等。显示屏盖和底座部分是由金属制成的,而底部和边框是由软塑料制成的。在盖子的中央有一个XMG的标志。前面的点状LED条确实给设备带来了某种游戏美感。
由于使用了金属,Neo 15感觉非常坚固,特别是在底座部分。笔记本电脑几乎没有任何弯曲,扭曲或弯曲时也不会发出任何吱吱嘎嘎的声音。当然,盖子的硬度要低一些。也就是说,显示屏可以承受一些扭曲而不受影响。然而,一个缺点是,指纹会在哑光表面上积累。
不幸的是,塑料下壳非常柔软,可能会发生这种情况:如果你只用一只手在 "错误 "的地方(即右下角的通风口周围)握住设备,这个地方可能会被推到很远,以至于触碰到旋转的风扇。
除此以外,Neo 15拥有出色的装配和加工,感觉非常紧凑和坚固,配备的铰链足够牢固,但不会太硬。
在26.6毫米(1.05英寸)的厚度上,尼奥并没有试图与超薄的 Razer Blade 15.但由于其紧凑的设计,它给人的感觉比实际情况略薄。大多数竞争对手的厚度大致相同;只有 MSI Stealth是相当苗条的。
笔记本电脑的紧凑性也反映在它的尺寸上--其他的笔记本电脑都没有Neo 15所占的深度小。就重量而言,Neo在对比组中处于正中间的位置。只有Stealth轻了100克(0.22磅),而Nitro和MSI GE67都重了约200克(0.44磅)。
规格 - 没有Thunderbolt,USB-C端口速度慢
不幸的是,基于AMD的Neo 15上的USB-C端口与英特尔型号的不同。在AMD版本中,你不仅没有得到Thunderbolt,而且USB-C端口只有3.2 Gen2x1类型,而不是Gen2x2。同样也不支持Power Delivery。
从积极的方面看,这款笔记本电脑有两个独立的音频插孔(麦克风+耳机),而且端口在左、右和后面都有很好的安排。XMG OASIS的。也位于后部。
SD卡阅读器
读卡器接受普通的SD卡。当你插入SD卡时,大约一半的卡会伸出插槽,因为它没有锁定机制。
该读卡器的传输速度或多或少处于较低水平。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years) | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
连接性
Neo配备了一个英特尔AX200无线模块。虽然这个无线卡支持Wi-Fi 6,但它仍然不能在6GHz频段工作。它能提供良好和稳定的传输速率,但对比中的其他Wi-Fi模块则略微快一些。
网络摄像头
好处:Neo 15配备了一个全高清网络摄像头。不太好的地方:图像质量比一些720p型号的产品要差(见下面的照片)。
安全问题
Neo 15上没有指纹传感器,但是TPM 2.0和Kensington插槽都在船上。
配件和保修
与许多其他制造商不同,申克公司以不吝惜配件而闻名。例如,盒子里有一个大鼠标垫和一个包含驱动程序的U盘。
该公司提供24个月的保修,包括取货和退货服务,以及购买后头六个月内的快速维修。
维护
塑料底部由总共14颗十字头螺钉固定,其中四颗在液体冷却端口上。当你从背面开始时,非常容易抬起底板。一旦笔记本机箱被打开,你就可以看到两个M.2 SSD插槽、风扇、电池、Wi-Fi模块和两个内存插槽。
输入设备 - 光机械开关
键盘
光电机械键盘几乎占据了15英寸笔记本电脑的整个宽度。这足以容纳全尺寸的按键,甚至旁边还有同样大小的数字键盘。键盘之间的空间不大,但考虑到它们有多大,这并不是一个问题。
键盘有一个非常整洁的布局--所有东西都放在一个长方形内,没有任何凹槽或类似的东西。一方面,这意味着没有一个键是突出的或与其他键隔离的,用户只需要依靠图例和自己的经验来导航键盘。另一方面,所有的东西都在它该在的地方。
由于其适度的键程和清晰的反馈,Neo上的键盘在打字时也相当舒适,因此能够快速打字。打字的声音有点 "哗啦啦",但也不算太糟。这款笔记本电脑还具有每个键的RGB照明,可在黑暗环境中使用。
触摸板
触摸板大小适中(约11.6 x 7.4厘米,或4.6 x 2.9英寸),表面光滑,这意味着即使你的手指在触摸板上缓慢滑动也不会出现卡顿现象。左上角有一个微小的LED,指示触摸板是否启用。
集成的点击按钮比我们认为的舒适程度略微偏硬,但它们提供了独特的反馈和清晰的点击声。
显示屏 - 240Hz QHD显示屏,全sRGB覆盖
申克公司在所有型号上使用相同的16:9 QHD IPS面板,分辨率为2,560 x 1,440。该显示屏的峰值亮度为350尼特,这是一个相对较好的水平,使Neo 15领先于微星的Stealth和宏碁的Nitro。
然而,其亮度分布仅为82%,有些低于平均水平。特别是,屏幕底部的亮度明显较低。
对于这个级别的笔记本电脑来说,黑度和对比度都很好。该显示器还具有良好的响应时间,并且不使用PWM。
|
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 367 cd/m²
Contrast: 1321:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.31 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.28 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
70.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.47
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) BOE0A67, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) BOE0A67, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6" | MSI GE67 HX 12UGS Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS BOE CQ NE156QHM-NZ2, IPS-level, 2560x1440, 15.6" | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR Chi Mei N156KME-GNA, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6" | MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Sharp LQ156T1JW04 (SHP153C), IPS-Level, 2560x1440, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -1% | 1% | 21% | 21% | 21% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 68.9 | 68.2 -1% | 71.7 4% | 96.2 40% | 95.6 39% | 96.4 40% |
sRGB Coverage | 97.7 | 97.2 -1% | 89.7 -8% | 99.9 2% | 99.8 2% | 99.7 2% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.4 | 69.4 -1% | 75.2 7% | 84.5 20% | 85.2 21% | 85.6 22% |
Response Times | 0% | 97% | 39% | -22% | 29% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 12.4 ? | 12.4 ? -0% | 0.25 ? 98% | 7.86 ? 37% 4.21 ? 66% | 15.7 ? -27% | 6 ? 52% |
Response Time Black / White * | 8.8 ? | 8.8 ? -0% | 0.4 ? 95% | 7.5 ? 15% | 10.2 ? -16% | 8.4 ? 5% |
PWM Frequency | 480.4 ? | |||||
Screen | 15% | -30% | -35% | -30% | -43% | |
Brightness middle | 370 | 365 -1% | 356.1 -4% | 346 -6% | 332 -10% | 272 -26% |
Brightness | 343 | 335 -2% | 358 4% | 329 -4% | 303 -12% | 253 -26% |
Brightness Distribution | 82 | 81 -1% | 99 21% | 91 11% | 86 5% | 87 6% |
Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.32 -14% | 0.59 -111% | 0.29 -4% | 0.25 11% | |
Contrast | 1321 | 1141 -14% | 586 -56% | 1145 -13% | 1088 -18% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.31 | 1.38 40% | 4.83 -109% | 3.06 -32% | 3.61 -56% | 3.73 -61% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.03 | 2.01 50% | 7.94 -97% | 5.81 -44% | 7.71 -91% | 9.43 -134% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.28 | 1.36 59% | 3.1 5% | 5.2 -59% | 6.5 -98% | |
Gamma | 2.47 89% | 2.48 89% | 2.2 100% | 2.12 104% | 2.155 102% | 2.172 101% |
CCT | 6206 105% | 6412 101% | 5938 109% | 7021 93% | 6724 97% | 6485 100% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.22 | 2.57 | 0.59 | 0.98 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 5% /
9% | 23% /
1% | 8% /
-5% | -10% /
-17% | 2% /
-17% |
* ... smaller is better
该屏幕并不真正适合专业的照片和视频编辑。虽然该显示器有完整的sRGB覆盖,但它只能覆盖大约70%的AdobeRGB和DisplayP3色彩空间。
显示屏在开箱时就已经被校准得相当好。尽管Delta E值不是特别低,但即使我们自己手动校准了屏幕,也没有任何改善。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.6 ms rise | |
↘ 4.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
12.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.8 ms rise | |
↘ 6.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
在户外使用该设备时,你应该寻找一个阴凉的地方,并确保你是直着看显示屏的。这是因为当以某种角度或在阳光直射下观看时,屏幕内容非常难以阅读。
性能--AMD和英特尔几乎不相上下
在bestware的网站上,你可以找到许多不同的方式来配置Neo 15 M22。但它总是配备相同的面板和AMD处理器。那些想用英特尔CPU代替的人可以看看Neo 15 E22。
笔记本电脑 RTX 3070 Ti与最低端的GPU选项(RTX 3060)相比,我们的评测单位在购买价格上增加了约497欧元(494美元)。RTX 3060).从RTX 3060升级到RTX 3080 Ti,将花费1376欧元(1368美元)。 RTX 3080 Ti.
许多其他组件,如固态硬盘、DDR5内存和Wi-Fi模块,也同样可以升级。
测试条件
控制中心软件提供了几个性能配置文件(平衡、爱好者和超增压)。我们选择了最强大的模式(Overboost),使我们得到了最好的基准结果,尽管Schenker推荐的是中间选项,该选项旨在成为性能和噪音水平之间的最佳妥协。
此外,该软件允许用户手动调整各种参数(如动态提升)以及偏移值。尽管如此,我们还是希望看到在选项中增加一个静音模式。
处理器
与Neo 15 E22不同的是,它配备了一个 酷睿i7-12700H,Neo M22采用的是 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX.Zen 3+ CPU有八个核心,可以在4.9 GHz的速度下运行,并同时运行16个线程。该处理器还包含一个 Radeon 680M集成GPU。
当连续循环运行Cinebench时,Ryzen CPU提供了其一贯的性能,在最初几次运行后没有任何下滑。然而,基于英特尔的Neo 15中的Core i7-12700H略微快一些。而这一点自然也适用于 酷睿i9-12900H或甚至ROG Strix中的 酷睿i7-12800HX微星GE67中的Core i7-12800HX。
TDP始终保持在90瓦以下。在 "发烧友 "模式下,用电量略微下降到约85瓦特。
相比之下,当笔记本电脑使用电池供电时,性能有所下降,TDP降低到 "仅仅 "50瓦。
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average of class Gaming | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=193, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (9709 - 15100, n=19) |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Average of class Gaming (1088 - 2235, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (1516 - 1616, n=19) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (3742 - 5813, n=19) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (595 - 631, n=19) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years) | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (1588 - 2411, n=19) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (241 - 261, n=19) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (212 - 357, n=21) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years) | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years) | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (49526 - 65336, n=20) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (5090 - 6070, n=20) | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years) | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (8313 - 10490, n=21) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (1523 - 1652, n=21) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (12.6 - 18.7, n=20) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (44.8 - 81.7, n=20) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years) | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (0.4627 - 0.4974, n=20) | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (10950 - 17963, n=20) | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (71414 - 110797, n=20) | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years) | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (2471 - 3804, n=20) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (84185 - 107544, n=20) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (10970 - 13205, n=20) | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (39164 - 61370, n=20) | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (54613 - 142360, n=20) | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (578 - 911, n=20) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (5798 - 9540, n=20) | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (26873 - 30604, n=20) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR |
系统性能
在PCMark 10中,Neo 15提供的结果或多或少符合我们的预期。然而,除了摇摇欲坠的宏碁Nitro 5之外,其他竞争对手的速度都比较快,尤其是 MSI Raider GE67和 华硕ROG Strix.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (7161 - 7332, n=3) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10431 - 10934, n=3) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (9043 - 9960, n=3) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (9351 - 10817, n=3) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=151, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1624 - 1743, n=2) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=151, last 2 years) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1591 - 1722, n=2) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=151, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1749 - 1809, n=2) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=151, last 2 years) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1382 - 1615, n=2) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) |
PCMark 10 Score | 7188 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (47938 - 53345, n=20) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (43892 - 53321, n=20) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (51085 - 57202, n=20) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (80.7 - 120.6, n=20) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
在打开几个浏览器标签到我们的主页后,我们遇到了第一个DPC问题。在以60 FPS播放我们的4K YouTube视频时,延迟增加。内核驱动被怀疑是这个问题的主要原因。
但至少没有任何丢帧,而且在播放测试视频时,CPU/GPU的使用率非常低。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储
Neo 15可以配置无数的SSD选项。我们的评测单元采用了1TB的三星980 Pro固态硬盘,目前在我们的SSD/HDD基准列表中排名第12位。.即使在很长一段时间内,该驱动器也能保持其出色的性能。
* ... smaller is better
Sustained Load Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
我们的评测装置有一个 GeForce RTX 3070 TiTGP目标为150瓦,包括动态提升。这些值可以在控制中心手动调整。另外,你也可以在Neo 15上安装各种GPU,包括 RTX 3060到 RTX 3080 Ti.
正如我们所预期的那样,评测单位的GPU得分比普通的RTX 3070 Ti高出5%至10%。微星 微星GE67是对比中唯一明显更快的设备。虽然 Strix Scar往往比Neo的得分高,但性能差异大多可以忽略不计,大约只有2%。
Neo 15在使用电池运行时失去了大量的3D性能。例如,当我们拔掉笔记本的电源并再次运行Fire Strike ,物理和图形得分分别只有20,021和5,238,而不是Neo与电源连接时获得的26,338和28,105。
3DMark 11 Performance | 30616 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 57616 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 24908 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 10520 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
Neo 15基本上能够流畅地运行所有测试的游戏,即使在QHD分辨率和最大设置下也是如此。只有在《毁灭之光2》(35 FPS)等游戏中,当光线追踪设置设置为高时,笔记本电脑才开始出现一些问题。
在比较中,游戏测试结果与3DMark的测试结果相似:Neo中的GPU在很大程度上(但并不总是)比普通的RTX 3070 Ti表现更好。也就是说,华硕ROG Strix Scar,特别是微星GE67的速度比Neo快。
在Witcher 3 ,帧率基本稳定。但是我们注意到,GPU温度(平行记录)在测试期间持续上升,并没有真正稳定下来。这表明,在长时间运行高要求的游戏后,GPU可能开始出现热节流现象,尽管在一小时的测试中没有发生这种情况。GPU的平均用电量为120瓦。
在比较中,即使是基于英特尔的Neo与RTX 3080 Ti在相同的设置下也没有大幅提高。一般来说,基于英特尔的Neo中极其昂贵的GPU很难用它提供的性能收益来证明其高价。根据游戏和设置的不同,它只领先约1%至25%。
Witcher 3 FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 176.6 | 170.3 | 156.2 | 97.6 | 93 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 195 | 110 | |||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 135.9 | 123.1 | 116.3 | 114.1 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 109.5 | 94.9 | 77.6 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 119 | 110 | 102 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 305 | 224 | 206 | 189 | 143 |
Dying Light 2 (2022) | 82.5 | 59 |
排放 - 怠速时比Intel Neo更冷
噪声排放
虽然笔记本没有静音模式,但里面的风扇在空闲时经常不转。有趣的是,尽管有一个较弱的GPU,基于AMD的Neo在负载下并不像基于Intel的同类产品那样保持安静。在竞争对手中,只有宏碁Nitro 5稍微安静一些。但话说回来,它的性能也不如Neo。
当风扇不工作时,机箱里会发出柔和但高调的哔哔声。虽然这种噪音在风扇运转时听不到,但在安静的环境中还是很烦人的。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23 / 25.82 / 27.3 dB(A) |
Load |
| 42.7 / 56 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | MSI GE67 HX 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -1% | 3% | -30% | -8% | -9% | |
off / environment * | 23 | 23 -0% | 22.7 1% | 26.86 -17% | 26 -13% | 24 -4% |
Idle Minimum * | 23 | 23 -0% | 22.9 -0% | 39.07 -70% | 26 -13% | 31 -35% |
Idle Average * | 25.82 | 26.39 -2% | 22.9 11% | 39.07 -51% | 29 -12% | 32 -24% |
Idle Maximum * | 27.3 | 26.39 3% | 22.9 16% | 39.07 -43% | 33 -21% | 35 -28% |
Load Average * | 42.7 | 45.52 -7% | 44.4 -4% | 53.34 -25% | 47 -10% | 48 -12% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 56 | 55.89 -0% | 55.7 1% | 56.6 -1% | 53 5% | 43 23% |
Load Maximum * | 56 | 55.89 -0% | 57.4 -3% | 56.6 -1% | 53 5% | 48 14% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在空闲状态下,机箱温度仍然比基于英特尔的Neo与RTX 3080 Ti的温度更舒适。然而,这一优势在负载下几乎消失了。对比组中的其他设备可以得到与Neo差不多的温度。但在所有东西中,正是性能高但略显笨重的微星GE67比其他游戏笔记本运行得更凉爽。
掌托不曾变得令人不快,WASD键也是如此。热量主要集中在中间和靠近显示屏的区域。薄薄的塑料底板有许多通风口,导致它的温度大大高于键盘甲板。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | MSI GE67 HX 12UGS Intel Core i7-12800HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -20% | 11% | -14% | -9% | -5% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 41 | 44 -7% | 34.4 16% | 42.6 -4% | 48 -17% | 54 -32% |
Maximum Bottom * | 57 | 56 2% | 42 26% | 50.2 12% | 51 11% | 59 -4% |
Idle Upper Side * | 28 | 38 -36% | 24 14% | 36.2 -29% | 34 -21% | 26 7% |
Idle Bottom * | 30 | 41 -37% | 33.2 -11% | 40.2 -34% | 33 -10% | 27 10% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
与许多基于英特尔的系统不同,Neo的CPU时钟速度在我们一小时的压力测试中能够保持相当稳定。核心在4.1GHz开始测试,没有低于3.9GHz。它们还设法偶尔接近初始值。核心温度保持在恒定的95°C(203°F),平均用电量为64瓦特。
相比之下,GPU的数值波动更大。在最初以1.7GHz的速度运行后,GPU有时会下降到1GHz,然后再返回到初始时钟速度。在测试期间,VRAM速度是恒定的。GPU温度稳定在78°C(172°F)左右,而功耗很少达到150瓦的目标,平均约为114瓦。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 55 | 44 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 3.9 | 1,522 | 95 | 77 |
Witcher 3 应力 | 3.1 | 1,550 | 67 | 83 |
发言人
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.26 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - XMG Neo 15有很好的电池寿命
消耗功率
笔记本电脑在空闲时使用13到20瓦的功率,这取决于所选择的性能配置文件和显示亮度。在我们的比较中,这充其量是一个平均结果。
当运行Witcher 3 ,系统消耗了大约200瓦的功率--比稍快的华硕ROG Strix多出一小部分。
在压力测试期间,我们测量了260瓦的临时峰值功率使用。笨重的280瓦充电器可以轻松处理笔记本电脑的电源需求,特别是考虑到在压力测试过程中,功耗稳定在210瓦。
Off / Standby | 0.09 / 4.3 Watt |
Idle | 13 / 17 / 20 Watt |
Load |
89 / 260 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6" | MSI GE67 HX 12UGS i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS-level, 2560x1440, 15.6" | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6" | MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS-Level, 2560x1440, 15.6" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -14% | -20% | 5% | 3% | 3% | -19% | -13% | |
Idle Minimum * | 13 | 15 -15% | 16.1 -24% | 7.56 42% | 7 46% | 11 15% | 14.2 ? -9% | 13.5 ? -4% |
Idle Average * | 17 | 18 -6% | 17.1 -1% | 13.5 21% | 15 12% | 16 6% | 19.9 ? -17% | 18.9 ? -11% |
Idle Maximum * | 20 | 18 10% | 26.6 -33% | 16.87 16% | 24 -20% | 23 -15% | 26.2 ? -31% | 26.7 ? -34% |
Load Average * | 89 | 123 -38% | 116.3 -31% | 128.9 -45% | 124 -39% | 110 -24% | 125.8 ? -41% | 106.6 ? -20% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 200 | 234 -17% | 237 -19% | 196.2 2% | 195.1 2% | 151 24% | ||
Load Maximum * | 260 | 301 -16% | 291.1 -12% | 274.86 -6% | 220 15% | 230 12% | 248 ? 5% | 249 ? 4% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power Consumption with External Monitor
电池寿命
申克公司为这台笔记本电脑配备了96Wh的电池。除了宏碁Nitro之外,对比中的所有设备都有类似的大电池。
相对于竞争对手,XMG Neo 15的电池寿命非常出色。看来申克公司对电源模式的微调工作做得很好。
在任何情况下,在屏幕亮度调低的情况下,这台笔记本电脑为我们提供了近11小时的网络浏览和视频播放。即使在最大屏幕亮度下,我们仍然能够通过Wi-Fi上网8.5小时。
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 93 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 93 Wh | MSI GE67 HX 12UGS i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 57.5 Wh | MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -24% | -9% | -30% | -49% | -26% | -31% | |
H.264 | 643 | 428 -33% | 510 -21% | 283 -56% | 408 ? -37% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 653 | 464 -29% | 336 -49% | 501.4 -23% | 234 -64% | 324 -50% | 376 ? -42% |
Load | 98 | 88 -10% | 128 31% | 52 -47% | 72 -27% | 96 -2% | 85.3 ? -13% |
Reader / Idle | 505 | 340 | 467 | 565 ? | |||
Witcher 3 ultra | 70 | 78.3 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 英特尔还是AMD?这是一个偏好的问题。
即使采用AMD处理器,Neo 15也是一款出色的游戏笔记本电脑。在空闲状态下,基于AMD的Neo比基于英特尔的同类产品运行得更冷,电池寿命更长。反过来说,它的CPU性能略低,而且缺乏对Thunderbolt的支持。消费者需要决定什么对他们更重要。
这款笔记本电脑的游戏性能处于中上水平,但可以使用广泛的手动设置来进一步提高。
超强的电池寿命给我们留下了深刻的印象,但在某些方面却略显纠结。我们喜欢显示屏和键盘甲板上使用的坚固的金属材料,但下壳太软,我们不喜欢。该设备有一个全高清网络摄像头,但它提供的图像质量很差,许多720p的型号根本能做得更好。这里仍有一点改进的余地。也就是说,这是一个相对较小的批评。
配备AMD Ryzen的XMG Neo 15是一款性能优异的游戏笔记本电脑,没有任何重大的缺点,它有一个可选外部水冷的连接。尽管如此,这款笔记本电脑上的许多伟大想法中的一些仍然可以使用一些改进。
如果你正在寻找替代品,我们特别推荐 Msi ge6 hx 12ugs它在几乎所有的性能测试中都领先,但在排放方面也没有差多少。你也可以看看 华硕ROG Strix Scar这款笔记本电脑与Neo 15并驾齐驱。
价格和可用性
Neo 15可以在XMG自己的网上商店(bestware.com)进行多种配置。我们的评测模型,价格为2877欧元(2850美元),来自该网站.选择RTX 3060而不是RTX 3070 Ti,你可以节省近500欧元(495美元)!如果你在比较网站上看了一下,你就会发现,你的价格比RTX 3070 Ti高。如果你在比较网站上寻找,你可能有时也会发现笔记本电脑的价格略低。
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
- 10/26/2022 v7 (old)
Christian Hintze