XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) 评测：专为游戏玩家和创作者打造的 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑

Name: SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Brand: SCHENKER

和谐。

据申克公司介绍，XMG Pro 16 Studio 是 "用于内容创作的专业工作站"。规格符合要求：酷睿 i9、RTX 4070、雷电 4 和 16:10 显示屏（QHD+，240 Hz）。据称，蒸发室可确保最佳散热和静音冷却。

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 10/23/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Intel Laptop / Notebook Raptor Lake Thunderbolt Windows Workstation

XMG Pro 16 Studio（Mid 23）是一款面向游戏玩家和创作者的 16 英寸笔记本电脑，基于 Clevo 生产的裸机（PE60RNE-S），目前的售价约为 2,400 美元。竞争对手包括联想Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8, HP Omen Transcend 16, 华硕 Vivobook Pro 16X和微星隐形 16 Studio A13VG.

Test device courtesy of Schenker Technologies

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)

Processor

Intel Core i9-13900H 14 x 1.9 - 5.4 GHz, 90 W PL2 / Short Burst, 70 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 2175 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 140 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 31.0.15.3758, Optimus

Memory

32 GB

, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel-Mode, two memory slots (both in use)

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, glossy: no, 240 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Storage

Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, 1024 GB

, PCIe 4, M.2-2280, 875 GB free

Soundcard

Realtek ALC1220 @ Intel Raptor Lake-P/U/H PCH

Connections

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Headset combined port, Mic-in, Card Reader: MicroSD, TPM 2.0

Networking

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 19.9 x 359.5 x 273

Battery

73 Wh, 4600 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

Webcam: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Mousepad, USB-Thumbdrive (Driver, Applications), Bottle Opener, Thermalpad (SSD), Screw (SSD), 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.56 kg, Power Supply: 556 g

Price

2256 Euro

Links

SCHENKER homepage
SCHENKER notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
87.9 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2023	SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.6 kg	19.9 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
86.2 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2023	Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	22.8 mm	16.00"	3200x2000
90 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2023	Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	19.9 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
87.9 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2023	HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	19.8 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
88.8 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2023	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2 kg	19.95 mm	16.00"	2560x1600

机箱和连接性 - 配备 Thunderbolt 4 的 Clevo 裸机

哑光黑色外壳的盖子和底部由铝制成，其余部分由塑料制成。机箱设计精巧，做工精良。底座和盖子可以轻微扭动，但不用担心。取下底板后，就可以接触到电池（用螺丝固定，而非胶粘）以及笔记本电脑的其他内部部件。

Pro 配备了两个 USB-A 端口（USB 3.2 Gen 1）和两个 USB-C 端口（1 个 USB 3.2 Gen 2、1 个雷电 4）。TB-4 端口支持 Power Delivery 并可输出 DisplayPort 信号。该笔记本电脑总共有三个视频输出接口（1 个 HDMI 接口，2 个 DP 接口）。它的 MicroSD 读卡器（参考卡：AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60）速度一般。它的网络摄像头（210 万像素，最大 1,920 x 1,080 像素，无盖）非常标准。

在最佳条件下（附近没有 WiFi 设备，笔记本电脑和服务器电脑之间距离较近），它的 WiFi 数据传输速率非常高。笔记本电脑使用 WiFi 6E 芯片（英特尔 AX211），有线连接由 Realtek RTL8125 控制器（2.5 GBit/s）负责。

尺寸比较

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 HP Omen Transcend 16 MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG DIN A4 ❌

右侧MicroSD 读卡器、Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 (USB-C；Power Delivery、DisplayPort)、USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)、电缆锁插槽

背面：电源连接、USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C)、HDMI 2.1、Mini DisplayPort 1.4a、千兆以太网（2.5 GBit/秒）

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	158 (154.8^min - 166.31^max) MB/s +84%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	120 MB/s +40%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years)	95.5 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	86 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	84.2 MB/s -2%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	180.68 MB/s +101%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	126 MB/s +40%
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years)	119.3 MB/s +33%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	90 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	89.7 MB/s 0%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1444 (1147^min - 1531^max) MBit/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1444 (1170^min - 1766^max) MBit/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1386 (708^min - 1471^max) MBit/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1325 (977^min - 1480^max) MBit/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=151, last 2 years)	1235 MBit/s -11%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (464 - 1921, n=239)	1234 MBit/s -11%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1151 (615^min - 1213^max) MBit/s -17%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1714 (1675^min - 1737^max) MBit/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1714 (1696^min - 1727^max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=151, last 2 years)	1383 MBit/s -19%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=239)	1379 MBit/s -20%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1364 (675^min - 1404^max) MBit/s -20%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1339 (1216^min - 1449^max) MBit/s -22%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1287 (679^min - 1410^max) MBit/s -25%

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1362 (708-1471)

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1444 (1147-1531)

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1131 (615-1213)

HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1445 (1170-1766)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1325 (977-1480)

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1714 (1696-1727)

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1714 (1675-1737)

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1264 (679-1410)

HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1339 (1216-1449)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1341 (675-1404)

ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23): 5.8 ∆E min: 1.38 - max: 10.18 ∆E

输入设备 - XMG 笔记本电脑配备发光按键

这款 Chiclet 键盘（RGB 照明）的按键均匀平滑，键程适中，按压点清晰。按键阻力可能会更小一些。总的来说，申克提供了一款适合日常使用的键盘。点击板可替代鼠标（约 15.1 x 9.1 厘米），具有较短的键程和清晰的按压点。

显示屏 - 16:10 面板，sRGB 覆盖范围

该设备的长宽比为 16:10 的 240-Hz 快速反应面板在任何亮度水平下都没有 PWM 闪烁的迹象。16 英寸哑光显示屏（2560 x 1600 像素）的亮度和对比度都达到了各自的目标（大于 300 cd/m² 和 1,000:1）。没有替代显示屏。


354 cd/m²	357 cd/m²	354 cd/m²
347 cd/m²	349 cd/m²	350 cd/m²
339 cd/m²	331 cd/m²	354 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 357 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 348.3 cd/m² Minimum: 35 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 349 cd/m²
Contrast: 1091:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.98 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.45
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
70.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.137

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Samsung SDC4178 ATNA60BX01-1, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"	Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 CSOT T3 MNG007DA2-3, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	HP Omen Transcend 16 AUOA3A6, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16"	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG AUO26A9, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Display		27%	2%	23%	21%
Display P3 Coverage	69.4	98.4 42%	70.4 1%	99.2 43%	96.4 39%
sRGB Coverage	98.2	99.7 2%	99.4 1%	100 2%	99.7 2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	70.1	95.8 37%	72.5 3%	87.6 25%	84.8 21%
Response Times		85%	-7%	-191%	46%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	12.2 ?(5.9, 6.3)	1.6 ?(0.8, 0.8) 87%	12 ?(6, 6) 2%	26.4 ?(15, 11.4) -116%	4.4 ?(2.2, 2.2) 64%
Response Time Black / White *	7.7 ?(4, 3.7)	1.4 ?(0.6, 0.8) 82%	8.9 ?(5.1, 3.8) -16%	28.2 ?(21.6, 6.6) -266%	5.6 ?(2.2, 3.4) 27%
PWM Frequency		120 ?(100)		3506 ?(100)
Screen		66%	17%	204%	-19%
Brightness middle	349	347 -1%	474.6 36%	791.1 127%	424 21%
Brightness	348	346 -1%	445 28%	800 130%	411 18%
Brightness Distribution	93	97 4%	86 -8%	95 2%	88 -5%
Black Level *	0.32	0.06 81%	0.39 -22%	0.04 87%	0.37 -16%
Contrast	1091	5783 430%	1217 12%	19778 1713%	1146 5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.98	1.89 5%	2.12 -7%	4.37 -121%	3.04 -54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.56	3.26 57%	4.73 37%	10.39 -37%	7.5 1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.45	1.97 -36%	0.57 61%	1.04 28%	3.04 -110%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.3	1.55 53%	2.8 15%	6.5 -97%	4.34 -32%
Gamma	2.137 ^103%	2.39 ^92%	2.22 ^99%	2.28 ^96%	2.32 ^95%
CCT	6672 ^97%	6458 ^101%	6542 ^99%	6000 ^108%	6952 ^93%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		59% / 60%	4% / 10%	12% / 109%	16% / -1%

* ... smaller is better

开箱后，屏幕显示的色彩描绘相当不错：偏差约为 2，达到了目标（DeltaE < 3）。校准显示屏后，偏差缩小到 1.45，灰阶也更加均衡。该面板几乎可以完全显示 sRGB 色彩空间，但无法显示 AdobeRGB 或 DCI P3。在这一点上，竞争对手有时更胜一筹。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
7.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4 ms rise
7.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
12.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.9 ms rise
12.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 6.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

笔记本电脑视角稳定的 IPS 面板在任何角度都清晰易读。在室外，只要阳光不是太强烈，你就可以通过显示屏阅读。

性能 - 申克笔记本电脑依赖于 Raptor Lake 和 Ada Lovelace

面向玩家和创作者的 XMG Pro 16 Studio 依赖于 Raptor Lake 和 Ada Lovelace。GeForce RTX Studio 认证可确保高性能、定制驱动程序、良好的软件支持和合适的显示色彩空间覆盖范围。该笔记本电脑可通过Schenker 在线商店进行个性化配置。.目前的型号售价约为 2,400 美元，更便宜的型号约为 1,900 美元起。

测试条件

Pro 提供四种特定于制造商的性能模式（见表），可通过控制中心软件（笔记本电脑的控制中心）进行切换。使用了 "娱乐模式"（基准测试）和 "省电模式"（电池测试）。Optimus 处于激活状态。

	娱乐模式	性能模式	省电模式	静音模式
功率限制 1 (HWInfo)	70 瓦	100 瓦	15 瓦	15 瓦
功率限制 2 (HWInfo)	90 瓦	120 瓦	30 瓦	30 瓦
噪音 (Witcher 3)	48 分贝(A)	55 分贝(A)	-	42 分贝(A)
性能 (Witcher 3)	~114 帧/秒	~118 帧/秒	-	~100-114 帧/秒

处理器

酷睿 i9-13900H酷睿 i9-13900H(6P, 8E) 14 个 CPU 内核的最高时钟频率分别为 5.4 GHz (P)和 4.1 GHz (E)。永久多线程负载（CB15 循环）导致时钟频率在第一次至第四次运行时略有下降。之后，数值保持不变。

我们测得的基准结果略高于先前确定的 CPU 平均值（连接电源）。在电池模式下，更相关的单线程性能（158 分；CB15）比多线程性能（1,696 分；CB15）下降幅度更大。

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2574 (2525.07-2739.09)

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX: Ø3763 (3529.2-4703.12)

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2707 (2663.47-2966.92)

HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø3989 (3846.15-4100.04)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2552 (2375.16-3030.99)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	80.7 pt
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	79.7 pt
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 ^-1! Intel Core i9-13900H	70.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	67.8 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	62.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H	62.3 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H	59.4 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	28963 Points +64%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	25932 (23977.8^min - 25931.6^max) Points +46%
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=193, last 2 years)	21651 Points +22%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	20034 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H	19844 (18048.8^min - 19843.9^max) Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H	17706 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (11997 - 20385, n=28)	16813 Points -5%
Single Core
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2105 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H	2029 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H	1927 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (1297 - 2054, n=26)	1887 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (1088 - 2235, n=191, last 2 years)	1877 Points -3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	1854 Points -4%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	1825 Points -5%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	11260 Points +66%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	9895 Points +46%
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)	8240 Points +22%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	7674 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H	7640 Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H	6773 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (4935 - 7716, n=25)	6533 Points -4%
CPU (Single Core)
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	805 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H	775 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H	735 Points
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)	722 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (428 - 792, n=25)	720 Points -2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	719 Points -2%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	717 Points -2%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	4703 (3529.2^min - 4703.12^max) Points +72%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	4100 (3846.15^min - 4100.04^max) Points +50%
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)	3394 Points +24%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H	2967 (2663.47^min - 2966.92^max) Points +8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	2854 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H	2739 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (2061 - 3100, n=26)	2676 Points -2%
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	299 Points +8%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	289 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H	278 Points
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)	276 Points -1%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	273 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (211 - 297, n=26)	269 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H	233 Points -16%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (166 - 268, n=24)	205 Seconds * -10%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H	186 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years)	172.1 Seconds * +7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	169 Seconds * +9%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	136 Seconds * +27%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	123 Seconds * +34%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	105001 MIPS +53%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	104616 MIPS +53%
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years)	84653 MIPS +24%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	76344 MIPS +11%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H	71321 MIPS +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H	68491 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (45045 - 79032, n=25)	66435 MIPS -3%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	6972 MIPS +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	6866 MIPS +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H	6458 MIPS
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H	6391 MIPS -1%
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years)	6281 MIPS -3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	6125 MIPS -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3665 - 6600, n=25)	6054 MIPS -6%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	19012 Points +45%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	18475 Points +41%
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years)	14891 Points +14%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	13239 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H	13072 Points
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H	12766 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (9094 - 15410, n=26)	12649 Points -3%
Single-Core
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2058 Points +11%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	2001 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H	1950 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (1140 - 2043, n=26)	1895 Points +2%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years)	1882 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H	1861 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	1829 Points -2%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	27 fps +43%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	26.2 fps +39%
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years)	23.3 fps +23%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H	21.5 fps +14%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	19.7 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H	18.9 fps
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (14.1 - 22.3, n=25)	18.5 fps -2%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	54.6 s * -24%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	51.4 s * -16%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (34.4 - 82.8, n=25)	47.6 s * -8%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years)	47.6 s * -8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H	44.2 s *
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	43.8 s * +1%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H	34.4 s * +22%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	0.4498 sec * -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (0.4052 - 0.723, n=25)	0.4493 sec * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H	0.4412 sec *
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years)	0.4402 sec * -0%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H	0.4182 sec * +5%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	0.4041 sec * +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.4028 sec * +9%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2739 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

233 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

278 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

6773 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

735 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1927 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

17706 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	97.6 pt
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	90.2 pt
Average of class Gaming	86.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	76 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	73.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	72.4 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H	67.3 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	23600 KRay/s +44%
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years)	21640 KRay/s +32%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	21332 KRay/s +30%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	17934 KRay/s +9%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	17741 KRay/s +8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	16419 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6788 - 19557, n=25)	15135 KRay/s -8%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	117390 Points +41%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	108001 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years)	106090 Points +27%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	89277 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	83334 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	81656 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (22551 - 95579, n=25)	76236 Points -9%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	5888 MB/s +55%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	5264 MB/s +38%
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years)	4852 MB/s +27%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4080 MB/s +7%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	3973 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	3809 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (2491 - 4270, n=25)	3561 MB/s -7%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	126758 Points +21%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	126217 Points +21%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	120299 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years)	116237 Points +11%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	105597 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (65121 - 120936, n=25)	105169 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	104502 Points

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	13785 Points +33%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13440 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years)	13175 Points +27%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	11232 Points +8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	11050 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	10361 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6108 - 11631, n=25)	9675 Points -7%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	58716 Points +43%
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years)	53471 Points +31%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	53398 Points +30%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	44368 Points +8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	44154 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	40932 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (11283 - 48474, n=25)	37712 Points -8%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	141059 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	111789 MB/s -21%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years)	109176 MB/s -23%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	105169 MB/s -25%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3691 - 149377, n=25)	87238 MB/s -38%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	81504 MB/s -42%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	81046 MB/s -43%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1689 MB/s +55%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	1513 MB/s +39%
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years)	1349 MB/s +24%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1254 MB/s +15%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1088 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (789 - 1254, n=25)	1040 MB/s -4%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1032 MB/s -5%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	12891 KRay/s +44%
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years)	11654 KRay/s +30%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	11431 KRay/s +28%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	9680 KRay/s +8%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	9570 KRay/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	8955 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3655 - 10716, n=25)	8215 KRay/s -8%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	50609 MPixel/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	47412 MPixel/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	46114 MPixel/s -3%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	43965 MPixel/s -7%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years)	39919 MPixel/s -16%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (10871 - 50488, n=25)	39722 MPixel/s -16%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	23815 MPixel/s -50%

系统性能

运行流畅的系统并不缺乏计算能力。游戏、渲染和视频编辑是该电脑的核心竞争力。内存的传输速率达到了 DDR5-5600 内存的正常水平。

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8538 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	8153 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	8010 Points
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)	7774 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (5855 - 8538, n=8)	7664 Points -4%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	7329 Points -9%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	6883 Points -14%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	11940 Points
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	11329 Points -5%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	11302 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years)	10836 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (8835 - 11940, n=8)	10809 Points -9%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	10547 Points -12%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	10491 Points -12%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10991 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	10425 Points
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years)	9878 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (7967 - 10991, n=8)	9840 Points -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	9735 Points -7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	9376 Points -10%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	9030 Points -13%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	13562 Points +21%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	13370 Points +19%
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years)	12030 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (7738 - 13575, n=8)	11549 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	11204 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	10860 Points -3%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	9291 Points -17%

CrossMark / Overall
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	2050 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1974 Points +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1970 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1955 Points
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=151, last 2 years)	1899 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1104 - 1974, n=7)	1815 Points -7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1789 Points -8%

CrossMark / Productivity
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	1919 Points +2%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1914 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1884 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1812 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=151, last 2 years)	1801 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1058 - 1914, n=7)	1720 Points -9%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1705 Points -10%

CrossMark / Creativity
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	2353 Points +16%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	2316 Points +14%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2084 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=151, last 2 years)	2083 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2028 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1178 - 2254, n=7)	1982 Points -2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1936 Points -5%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1952 Points
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1839 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=151, last 2 years)	1699 Points -13%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	1651 Points -15%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1037 - 1952, n=7)	1650 Points -15%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1635 Points -16%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1557 Points -20%

PCMark 10 Score		8010 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	77103 MB/s +10%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	70102 MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	69289 MB/s -1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	68474 MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years)	64907 MB/s -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (37448 - 74486, n=25)	61864 MB/s -12%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	37448 MB/s -47%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	84131 MB/s +12%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	75581 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	75433 MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	73950 MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years)	68658 MB/s -9%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (41599 - 75433, n=25)	62438 MB/s -17%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	41599 MB/s -45%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	76244 MB/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	72225 MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	71464 MB/s -1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	67649 MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years)	66727 MB/s -8%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (36152 - 88505, n=25)	65109 MB/s -10%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	36152 MB/s -50%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years)	94.1 ns * -8%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	89.9 ns * -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (75.8 - 102.3, n=25)	89.3 ns * -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	87.8 ns * -1%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	87.6 ns * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	87.1 ns *
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	83.2 ns * +4%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

标准延迟监控测试（网上冲浪、4K 视频播放、Prime95 高负载）发现了一些异常情况。该系统似乎不适合实时视频和音频编辑。未来的软件更新可能会带来改进，甚至降低性能。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	18226.8 μs * -881%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10410.4 μs * -460%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	2472 μs * -33%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1857.6 μs *
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1518 μs * +18%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

Pro 16 共可容纳两个 PCIe 4 SSD，格式为 M.2-2280。支持 RAID-0/1。我们测试设备中的三星固态硬盘（1 TB、PCIe 4、M.2-2280）提供了出色的传输速率。正面：没有出现热节流现象。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7122 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6782 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 1011 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 730.7 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 3528 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 4879 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 78.14 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 327.7 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	91.3 pt
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	80.4 pt
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	80.3 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	75.5 pt
Average of class Gaming	65.8 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	59.8 pt
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	42.5 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4414 (4394.81^min - 4413.86^max) MB/s +40%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=168, last 2 years)	3487 MB/s +10%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	3349 (938.07^min - 3349.15^max) MB/s +6%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (2556 - 4234, n=18)	3249 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3157 (2968.73^min - 3157.45^max) MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	3023 (3010.73^min - 3023.25^max) MB/s -4%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	2353 (2142.12^min - 2352.79^max) MB/s -25%
seq write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (3598 - 5842, n=18)	4777 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4698 (3640.45^min - 4697.66^max) MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	4485 (775.32^min - 4484.81^max) MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4306 (4280.74^min - 4306.08^max) MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=168, last 2 years)	3797 MB/s -19%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	3152 (3026.22^min - 3152.01^max) MB/s -33%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	2252 (2149.48^min - 2252.34^max) MB/s -52%
seq q8 t1 read
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (7011 - 7148, n=18)	7091 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	7090 (6633.87^min - 7089.84^max) MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	6899 (5306.42^min - 6899.46^max) MB/s -3%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6659 (5729.63^min - 6659.09^max) MB/s -6%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	6460 (6020.84^min - 6459.94^max) MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=168, last 2 years)	6328 MB/s -11%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	3974 (3600.81^min - 3974.33^max) MB/s -44%
seq q8 t1 write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (6531 - 6898, n=18)	6802 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	6770 (6323.06^min - 6770.24^max) MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	5716 (5661.68^min - 5716.31^max) MB/s -16%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5007 (4969.96^min - 5007.21^max) MB/s -26%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=168, last 2 years)	4823 MB/s -29%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	4803 (4344.79^min - 4802.73^max) MB/s -29%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	2934 (2895.62^min - 2933.5^max) MB/s -57%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	94.1 (93.93^min - 94.12^max) MB/s +70%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (55.3 - 99, n=18)	76.4 MB/s +38%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	67.9 (64.79^min - 67.93^max) MB/s +23%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=168, last 2 years)	65.8 MB/s +19%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	56.3 (55.9^min - 56.3^max) MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	55.3 (53.37^min - 55.32^max) MB/s
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	54.4 (50.25^min - 54.39^max) MB/s -2%
4k q1 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	343 (338.95^min - 343.03^max) MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	253 (250.9^min - 252.85^max) MB/s -26%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	252 (249.53^min - 252.23^max) MB/s -27%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (133.9 - 343, n=18)	235 MB/s -31%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 397, n=168, last 2 years)	222 MB/s -35%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	174.5 (172.12^min - 174.51^max) MB/s -49%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	127 (124.67^min - 127.01^max) MB/s -63%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4923 (4891.68^min - 4922.98^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4040 (4013.9^min - 4040.16^max) MB/s -18%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (818 - 4926, n=18)	3327 MB/s -32%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	3013 (755.04^min - 3013.06^max) MB/s -39%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=168, last 2 years)	2555 MB/s -48%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	932 (919.54^min - 932.39^max) MB/s -81%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	906 (859.8^min - 906.06^max) MB/s -82%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4394 (3486.17^min - 4394.19^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3555 (3527.21^min - 3555.07^max) MB/s -19%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2736 (1172^min - 2736.15^max) MB/s -38%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (413 - 4683, n=18)	2563 MB/s -42%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=168, last 2 years)	2101 MB/s -52%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	554 (543.86^min - 553.56^max) MB/s -87%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	501 (456.23^min - 501.33^max) MB/s -89%

AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	10265 Points
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8690 Points -15%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (5405 - 10591, n=18)	8308 Points -19%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	7774 Points -24%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=159, last 2 years)	6737 Points -34%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	6291 Points -39%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	3959 Points -61%
Score Read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4721 Points
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3300 Points -30%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2959 Points -37%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (1349 - 4721, n=18)	2891 Points -39%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=159, last 2 years)	2441 Points -48%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1523 Points -68%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	1215 Points -74%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4652 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	4064 Points -13%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (2308 - 4852, n=18)	4043 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3766 Points -19%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	3331 Points -28%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=159, last 2 years)	3113 Points -33%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	2165 Points -53%
Seq Read
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	5588.41 MB/s +16%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5447.03 MB/s +14%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (4362 - 5760, n=18)	5211 MB/s +9%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	5126 MB/s +7%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=159, last 2 years)	4944 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4797.97 MB/s
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	3160 MB/s -34%
Seq Write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (3376 - 5651, n=18)	4712 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4668.7 MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	4546 MB/s -3%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4058.01 MB/s -13%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	3875.81 MB/s -17%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=159, last 2 years)	3720 MB/s -20%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	2044 MB/s -56%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	86.39 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	76.81 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (52.7 - 90.9, n=18)	71.6 MB/s -7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	67.7 MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=159, last 2 years)	65.1 MB/s -15%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	55.48 MB/s -28%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	54.59 MB/s -29%
4K Write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	306.26 MB/s
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	248.8 MB/s -19%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	224.62 MB/s -27%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (172.3 - 306, n=18)	223 MB/s -27%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=159, last 2 years)	211 MB/s -31%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	207 MB/s -32%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	177.87 MB/s -42%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3164.36 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2669.14 MB/s -16%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2378 MB/s -25%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (787 - 3182, n=18)	2252 MB/s -29%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=159, last 2 years)	1876 MB/s -41%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	909.92 MB/s -71%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	843 MB/s -73%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3878.76 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	3498.72 MB/s -10%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (1592 - 4090, n=18)	3356 MB/s -13%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3135.34 MB/s -19%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2669 MB/s -31%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=159, last 2 years)	2533 MB/s -35%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	1712 MB/s -56%
Access Time Read
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	0.141 ms * -120%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.064 ms *
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=158, last 2 years)	0.05509 ms * +14%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (0.018 - 0.074, n=18)	0.0345 ms * +46%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.033 ms * +48%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	0.027 ms * +58%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	0.023 ms * +64%
Access Time Write
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.057 ms * -375%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	0.054 ms * -350%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=159, last 2 years)	0.04843 ms * -304%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	0.033 ms * -175%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	0.02 ms * -67%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (0.012 - 0.053, n=18)	0.01978 ms * -65%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.012 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB: Ø7081 (6350.81-7114.2)

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ: Ø3923 (3225.79-4033.87)

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø5933 (3276.75-6654.26)

HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N: Ø6898 (5515.51-6944.88)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH: Ø1946 (1623.72-6448.85)

图形卡

......（英文GeForce RTX 4070提供 4608 个着色器、128 位宽总线和快速 GDDR6 内存（8192 MB）。申克将其最大 TGP 设置为 140 瓦（115 瓦 + 25 瓦 Dynamic Boost）--不可能更高。

图形核心允许在高至最高设置下进行 QHD 游戏。在此过程中，它的帧率超过了之前确定的 RTX 4070 平均帧率。使用 dGPU 模式（通过 BIOS 激活）可略微提升性能。图形核心和内存可通过控制中心超频（性能模式 -> 点击向下箭头）。不支持高级优化。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	98 pt
Average of class Gaming	96.8 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	95.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	95.5 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	91.3 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	89.4 pt
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	69.1 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	43597 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)	43521 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	41432 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	41302 Points 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (24229 - 46434, n=59)	40410 Points -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	38784 Points -6%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	33576 Points -19%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	163483 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	162423 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (54238 - 193851, n=24)	148053 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)	142796 Points -12%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	81407 Points -50%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)	31245 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	30130 Points +1%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	30051 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	29892 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (12242 - 33451, n=62)	29041 Points -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	27343 Points -9%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	24184 Points -19%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)	13034 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	12734 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	11972 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	11960 Points 0%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	11955 Points 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (5012 - 13391, n=60)	11603 Points -3%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	9404 Points -21%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		54913 points
3DMark 11 Performance		34302 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		62061 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		25545 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		12134 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	26 Seconds * -24%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	24 Seconds * -14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (18 - 30, n=60)	21.5 Seconds * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	21 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=177, last 2 years)	21 Seconds * -0%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	19 Seconds * +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	19 Seconds * +10%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	45 Seconds * -32%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (32 - 181, n=63)	40.6 Seconds * -19%
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years)	36.7 Seconds * -8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	36 Seconds * -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	36 Seconds * -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	34 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	32 Seconds * +6%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	326 Seconds *
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	299 Seconds * +8%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	297 Seconds * +9%
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=191, last 2 years)	297 Seconds * +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (158 - 440, n=59)	290 Seconds * +11%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	249 Seconds * +24%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	222 Seconds * +32%

Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Average of class Gaming (5039 - 237138, n=193, last 2 years)	125975 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	120585 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	118031 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (17391 - 129366, n=61)	113893 Points -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	112077 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	111995 Points -7%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	100308 Points -17%
Vulkan Score 5.5
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	88210 Points
Average of class Gaming (7995 - 163089, n=123, last 2 years)	71890 Points -19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (42883 - 102618, n=32)	70985 Points -20%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	69300 Points -21%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	55643 Points -37%

Geekbench 6.3
GPU OpenCL
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	120852 Points
Average of class Gaming (4321 - 207373, n=109, last 2 years)	115663 Points -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (85488 - 129836, n=37)	113812 Points -6%
GPU Vulkan
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	109205 Points
Average of class Gaming (4286 - 196201, n=106, last 2 years)	82317 Points -25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (18099 - 120033, n=34)	71564 Points -34%

V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming (171 - 3824, n=114, last 2 years)	2181 mpaths +33%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	1834 mpaths +12%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	1719 mpaths +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (171 - 1872, n=36)	1648 mpaths 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	1643 mpaths
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	1635 mpaths 0%
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming (120 - 2797, n=116, last 2 years)	1568 mpaths +33%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	1327 mpaths +12%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	1193 mpaths +1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (120 - 1356, n=36)	1192 mpaths +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	1184 mpaths 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	1180 mpaths
CPU
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	17980 mpaths +51%
Average of class Gaming (3562 - 26944, n=119, last 2 years)	15070 mpaths +26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9339 - 20388, n=35)	14381 mpaths +20%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	13132 mpaths +10%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	11943 mpaths
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	11097 mpaths -7%

V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Average of class Gaming (54 - 1334, n=152, last 2 years)	701 mpaths +21%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	616 mpaths +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (434 - 686, n=46)	606 mpaths +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	579 mpaths
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	577 mpaths 0%
CPU
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	25644 ksamples +40%
Average of class Gaming (5413 - 37629, n=152, last 2 years)	21367 ksamples +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (12638 - 35173, n=46)	20879 ksamples +14%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	18346 ksamples
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	16974 ksamples -7%

SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Average of class Gaming (47.1 - 515, n=21, last 2 years)	307 fps +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (250 - 271, n=5)	258 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	253.3 fps
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Average of class Gaming (16.2 - 231, n=27, last 2 years)	37.3 fps +69%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (21.4 - 24.4, n=6)	22.5 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	22.1 fps
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Average of class Gaming (25.7 - 59.9, n=27, last 2 years)	40.3 fps +25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (32.2 - 36.9, n=6)	34.8 fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	32.2 fps
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Gaming (99.8 - 687, n=26, last 2 years)	416 fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	390 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (355 - 422, n=6)	389 fps 0%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
Average of class Gaming (20.6 - 76.5, n=27, last 2 years)	47.6 fps +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (41.3 - 42.9, n=6)	41.9 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	41.3 fps
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (95.9 - 121.2, n=6)	111.2 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	110.7 fps
Average of class Gaming (44 - 141.9, n=27, last 2 years)	107.9 fps -3%
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
Average of class Gaming (17.8 - 117.2, n=27, last 2 years)	73.4 fps +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (61.4 - 68.6, n=6)	64.7 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	64 fps
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Average of class Gaming (25.7 - 221, n=27, last 2 years)	125.8 fps +26%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	99.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (95.3 - 99.9, n=6)	97.8 fps -2%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	95.8 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 ^-2! Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	94.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	93.8 pt
Average of class Gaming	92.7 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	90.9 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86.6 pt
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	80.4 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)	126.9 fps +7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	119 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	118.4 (103^min) fps
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	117.9 (111^min) fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (69.8 - 133.7, n=55)	112.2 fps -5%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	111.8 (102^min) fps -6%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	98 fps -17%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	125.4 (4.46^min, 83.3^P1) fps
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	119.7 (4.54^min, 76.9^P1) fps -5%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	115.2 (3.93^min, 76.9^P1) fps -8%
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years)	113 fps -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (48.3 - 140.5, n=55)	110.9 fps -12%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	105.4 (5.19^min, 66.7^P1) fps -16%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	122.7 fps +6%
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=184, last 2 years)	119 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	115.5 fps
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	115 fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (41 - 131.9, n=57)	111 fps -4%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	84.4 fps -27%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	228 (19.8^min, 173.1^P1) fps +13%
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=182, last 2 years)	227 fps +12%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	208 (60.7^min, 153.8^P1) fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	202 (47.3^min, 151^P1) fps
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	200 (31.2^min, 147.4^P1) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (76.3 - 234, n=58)	196.1 fps -3%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	165.4 (5^min, 121.3^P1) fps -18%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	168.4 (146.6^min) fps +3%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	165.3 (144.1^min) fps +2%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	165.2 (140.9^min) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	162.8 (140.6^min) fps
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	154.7 (131.1^min) fps -5%
Average of class Gaming (30.8 - 220, n=190, last 2 years)	149.3 fps -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (89.7 - 187.5, n=59)	147.6 fps -9%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	132.9 fps +11%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	122.4 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	119.5 fps
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	110.2 fps -8%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	108.8 fps -9%
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=196, last 2 years)	107.2 fps -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (58.9 - 144.4, n=61)	104.6 fps -12%

Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming (16.7 - 159.7, n=71, last 2 years)	92.4 fps +7%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	91 (10.4^min) fps +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	87.5 (22.3^min) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (48 - 110, n=24)	85.4 fps -1%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming (37.7 - 116, n=58, last 2 years)	69 fps +25%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	55.4 (44.8^min) fps
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	54.5 (20.1^min) fps -2%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	54.4 (10.7^min) fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (30 - 63.9, n=24)	53.4 fps -4%

Lies of P
1920x1080 Best Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (137.4 - 148.1, n=3)	141.9 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	140.1 (53.5^min, 60.4^P0.1, 84.4^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (11 - 187, n=11, last 2 years)	93.7 fps -33%
2560x1440 Best Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (97.3 - 98.8, n=3)	97.9 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	97.3 (36.5^min, 49.3^P0.1, 56.7^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (54.5 - 136.4, n=5, last 2 years)	88.6 fps -9%

Assassin's Creed Mirage
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset (Adaptive Quality Off)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	99 (4^min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (97 - 99, n=5)	98 fps -1%
Average of class Gaming (21 - 160, n=17, last 2 years)	95.6 fps -3%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset (Adaptive Quality Off)
Average of class Gaming (44 - 136, n=12, last 2 years)	96.5 fps +29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (74 - 80, n=5)	76.8 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	75 (7^min) fps

Lords of the Fallen
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (44.3 - 66.1, n=3)	52.1 fps +14%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	45.9 (30.4^min, 31.1^P0.1, 37^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (12.7 - 64.2, n=10, last 2 years)	34 fps -26%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (29.1 - 45.6, n=3)	34.8 fps +20%
Average of class Gaming (21.9 - 43, n=5, last 2 years)	29.9 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	29.1 (16.5^min, 18.6^P0.1, 23.4^P1) fps

Total War Pharaoh
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (110 - 129, n=3)	117.4 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	113.3 fps
Average of class Gaming (11 - 113.3, n=12, last 2 years)	52.8 fps -53%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (87.2 - 96, n=3)	92.9 fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	87.2 fps
Average of class Gaming (24.1 - 87.2, n=4, last 2 years)	59.1 fps -32%

F1 23
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	71 (58^min) fps +5%
Average of class Gaming (12.9 - 149.2, n=40, last 2 years)	70.8 fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (49.5 - 100, n=14)	68.5 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	67.6 (52^min, 51^P1) fps
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	51.7 (41^min, 40^P1) fps -24%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (17 - 144.6, n=31, last 2 years)	50.5 fps +11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	45.6 (35^min, 35^P1) fps
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	45 (35^min) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (35.2 - 49, n=13)	42.5 fps -7%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	32.2 (18^min, 25^P1) fps -29%

Returnal
1920x1080 Epic Preset
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	88 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	85 (39^min) fps
Average of class Gaming (27 - 155, n=26, last 2 years)	84.7 fps 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	79 (16^min) fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (54 - 90, n=12)	77.4 fps -9%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	61 (8^min) fps -28%
2560x1440 Epic Preset
Average of class Gaming (39 - 119, n=21, last 2 years)	70.4 fps +12%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	64 (19^min) fps +2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	63 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	63 (41^min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (39 - 66, n=12)	57.6 fps -9%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	52 (12^min) fps -17%
1920x1080 Epic Preset + Epic Ray-Tracing
Average of class Gaming (4 - 128, n=11, last 2 years)	73.5 fps +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (71 - 75, n=5)	73.4 fps +3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	73 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	71 (41^min) fps

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø116.1 (103-121)

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø95.5 (89-103)

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø113.7 (100-120)

HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø105.7 (97-112)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø117.1 (108-122)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)	186.8	185.9	181.3	125.4	93.2
The Witcher 3 (2015)	474.9	365.4	231.4	118.4	86.9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	210	187.5	176.5	162.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	219	159.8	115.5		84.1
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	166.7	146.4	119.5
Strange Brigade (2018)	544	280	232	202	132.8
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022)	147	115	95.3	86.7	55.4
Returnal (2023)	115	112	101	85	63
F1 23 (2023)	279	261	198.2	67.6	45.6
Lies of P (2023)	206	182	159.8	140.1	97.3
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	131.7	113.2	98.3	87.9	57.1
Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023)	143	132	125	99	75
Total War Pharaoh (2023)	385.9	239.5	146.2	113.3	87.2
Lords of the Fallen (2023)	96.9	84.1	63.4	45.9	29.1

排放与动力 - Pro 16 运行时间出色

噪音排放

游戏时，噪音最高可达 55 dB(A)（性能模式）。我们使用的 "娱乐模式 "的噪音为 48 分贝（A），噪音适中。它还可以更安静：在 "静音模式 "下，噪音为 42 dB(A)，但会影响游戏性能。在空闲模式和日常使用（办公、上网）中，两个风扇中的一个经常处于使用状态，有时两个风扇都处于关闭状态。

Noise Level

Idle		26 / 29 / 34 dB(A)
Load		43 / 48 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A)

	SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Noise		-4%	10%	-3%	11%
off / environment *	25	25.2 -1%	22.8 9%	22.9 8%	24 4%
Idle Minimum *	26	26.6 -2%	23.6 9%	29.1 -12%	24 8%
Idle Average *	29	26.6 8%	23.6 19%	29.1 -0%	24 17%
Idle Maximum *	34	29.2 14%	25.7 24%	29.1 14%	24 29%
Load Average *	43	53.4 -24%	27.6 36%	45.7 -6%	34.81 19%
Witcher 3 ultra *	48		54.4 -13%	54.3 -13%	44.05 8%
Load Maximum *	48	56.9 -19%	54.4 -13%	54.3 -13%	51.57 -7%

* ... smaller is better

温度

压力测试和 Witcher 3测试导致笔记本电脑温度明显升高。在某些区域，我们测得的温度超过了 60 摄氏度。在日常使用中（办公、上网），这些数值一般保持在绿色区域内，但比竞争对手如联想Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8.

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


54 °C	55 °C	54 °C
51 °C	51 °C	46 °C
32 °C	33 °C	32 °C

Maximum: 55 °C
Average: 45.3 °C


65 °C	66 °C	61 °C
54 °C	60 °C	52 °C
34 °C	33 °C	33 °C

Maximum: 66 °C
Average: 50.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 50 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


31 °C	33 °C	31 °C
29 °C	30 °C	31 °C
28 °C	28 °C	30 °C

Maximum: 33 °C
Average: 30.1 °C


35 °C	35 °C	32 °C
33 °C	33 °C	31 °C
30 °C	29 °C	29 °C

Maximum: 35 °C
Average: 31.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 39 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


51 °C	51 °C	51 °C
50 °C	51 °C	45 °C
31 °C	32 °C	33 °C

Maximum: 51 °C
Average: 43.9 °C


64 °C	66 °C	58 °C
58 °C	59 °C	51 °C
33 °C	34 °C	33 °C

Maximum: 66 °C
Average: 50.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 51 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 66 °C / 151 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.1 °C / -7.4 F).

	SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Heat		11%	15%	16%	-6%
Maximum Upper Side *	55	39.7 28%	49.8 9%	47.4 14%	60 -9%
Maximum Bottom *	66	60 9%	48.8 26%	54.4 18%	61 8%
Idle Upper Side *	33	30.9 6%	29.4 11%	28.4 14%	38.2 -16%
Idle Bottom *	35	34.7 1%	30 14%	29.2 17%	37.7 -8%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

压力测试（连续使用 Prime95 和 Furmark）模拟极端情况，测试系统在满负荷情况下的稳定性。开始测试时，CPU（P：3.8 至 3.9 GHz，E：2.7 GHz）的时钟频率很高。在接下来的测试过程中，这些数值逐渐下降到基本时钟水平左右。GPU 几乎以全速运行。

发言人

立体声扬声器发出的声音整体上非常不错。低音还可以更有力一些。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

耗电量

Pro 16 没有显示任何明显的功耗值。对于所安装的硬件而言，耗电量处于正常水平。在 Witcher 3测试和压力测试时，功耗略有下降。电源功率（230 瓦）足够大。值得称赞：在比较范围内，XMG 笔记本电脑的总体能耗最低。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / Watt
Idle	8 / 12 / 23 Watt
Load	94 / 215 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-23%	-65%	-76%	-8%	-34%
Idle Minimum *	8	13.8 -73%	22 -175%	19.2 -140%	11 -38%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=157, last 2 years) -69%
Idle Average *	12	16 -33%	29 -142%	22.7 -89%	18 -50%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=157, last 2 years) -58%
Idle Maximum *	23	19 17%	39.5 -72%	55.4 -141%	19 17%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=157, last 2 years) -16%
Load Average *	94	147 -56%	98.7 -5%	128.4 -37%	91 3%	106.6 ?(32.1 - 201, n=155, last 2 years) -13%
Witcher 3 ultra *	181.5	147.8 19%	171.8 5%	206 -13%	130 28%
Load Maximum *	215	244 -13%	213.2 1%	292 -36%	228 -6%	249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=157, last 2 years) -16%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23); Witcher 3 ultra: Ø181.5 (173.7-188.4)

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø191.4 (173.8-210)

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø11.9 (7.59-23.1)

Power consumption with external monitor

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø113.2 (110.9-118.2)

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23); Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø134 (108.1-136.7)

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø152.1 (142.8-172.5)

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23); 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø177.1 (172.2-188.6)

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø18.9 (17.7-21.2)

运行时间

在我们进行的实际无线局域网测试（使用脚本调用网站时的负载情况）中，这款 16 英寸笔记本电脑的运行时间达到了 6:45 小时--这是一个总体不错的结果。在同类产品中，Pro 16 的电池容量最小（73 瓦时），但每瓦时运行时间却最长。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Edge 118)

6h 45min

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh	466 min +15%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh	405 min
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	390 min -4%
Average of class Gaming (85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years)	376 min -7%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh	261 min -36%
HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh	250 min -38%

Pros

+ 240 Hz QHD+ 显示屏

+ 16:10 面板

+ 高系统性能

+ 内存可扩展

+ 2 个 PCIe 4 插槽（RAID-0/1）

+ RGB 按键照明

+ 良好的音效

+ 雷电 4

+ 电力传输

Cons

- 8GB VRAM 无法满足未来需求

- 机箱发热严重

- 无 DCI-P3

结论 - 和谐的动力源

视频和图像编辑、流媒体、渲染和游戏都是这款笔记本电脑的专长。所需的动力由酷睿 i9-13900H和GeForce RTX 4070始终保持高水准。在性能和噪音排放之间找到一个良好的折衷方案是有可能的。

事实证明，申克的 XMG Pro 16 Studio（23 中型）是游戏玩家和创作者的强大工具。

其 QHD+ 显示屏（16 英寸，2560 x 1600 像素，sRGB，IPS，240 Hz）和适合工作的 16:10 宽高比总体上给我们留下了良好的印象。即便如此：创作者笔记本电脑的屏幕应该能够显示 DCI P3 色彩空间。两个固态硬盘插槽（PCIe 4）包括 RAID-0/1 支持，确保了大量存储空间和较短的加载时间。

它的 USB-C 端口（1 个 USB 3.2 Gen 2、1 个 Thunderbolt 4）使笔记本电脑可以轻松集成到现有的工作空间设置中，并提供更多扩展选项（外置 GPU、扩展坞）。它的 TB-4 端口可以输出 DisplayPort 信号，并支持 Power Delivery。此外，它的运行时间也相对较长。

另一个选择是联想Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8:它采用相同的 CPU 和 GPU，但计算能力稍强。笔记本电脑的弱点：功耗较高、焊接内存、固态硬盘节流。

价格和供应情况

XMG Pro 16 Studio 可通过Schenker 在线商店进行个性化配置和订购。.我们的测试设备售价约为 2,400 美元。

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) - 10/22/2023 v7 ^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis

77 / 98 → 79%

Keyboard

78%

Pointing Device

83%

Connectivity

73 / 80 → 91%

Weight

59 / 10-66 → 88%

Battery

73 / 95 → 77%

Display

89%

Games Performance

100%

Application Performance

96%

Temperature

73 / 95 → 77%

Noise

78 / 90 → 86%

Audio

86%

Camera

48 / 85 → 56%

Average

78%

88%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 339 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 459232 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) 评测：专为游戏玩家和创作者打造的 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑

Sascha Mölck, 2023-10-23 (Update: 2023-10-23)

XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) 评测：专为游戏玩家和创作者打造的 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑

和谐。

潜在的竞争对手比较

机箱和连接性 - 配备 Thunderbolt 4 的 Clevo 裸机

尺寸比较

输入设备 - XMG 笔记本电脑配备发光按键

显示屏 - 16:10 面板，sRGB 覆盖范围

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - 申克笔记本电脑依赖于 Raptor Lake 和 Ada Lovelace

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

系统性能

DPC 延迟

存储设备

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

排放与动力 - Pro 16 运行时间出色

噪音排放

温度

压力测试

发言人

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) audio analysis

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 audio analysis

耗电量

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Power consumption with external monitor

运行时间

Pros

Cons

结论 - 和谐的动力源

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison