Notebookcheck Logo

惠普 Omen Transcend 16 笔记本电脑评测：不仅仅是名称上的细微差别

比 Omen 16 更薄、更轻。

不要把它与普通的 Omen 16 混为一谈，Omen Transcend 16 是该系列的升级版，具有更新的功能和选项，未来的 Omen 型号可能会借鉴这些功能和选项。在扣动扳机之前，请了解所有的区别和变化。
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Raptor Lake
2023 HP Omen Transcend 16
2023 HP Omen Transcend 16

Omen Transcend 16 是标准 Omen 16 的变体。虽然它们采用了类似的机箱设计和材料，但 Omen Transcend 16 拥有几个重要的不同点，潜在买家应该了解这些不同点。

我们的评测机是最高配置，配备第 13 代 Raptor Lake Core i9-13900HX CPU、130 WGeForce RTX 4070 GPU 和 QHD+ (2560 x 1600) 240 Hz mini-LED 显示屏，全 DCI-P3 色彩，零售价约为 2500 美元。配置较低的 SKU 有酷睿 i7-13700HX、RTX 4050 GPU 和 165 Hz 1200p IPS，零售价约为 1250 美元。

该领域的竞争对手包括其他高端 16 英寸游戏笔记本电脑，如联想Legion Slim 7i 16 G8 ，宏碁 Nitro 16 ，Alienware x16 R1 ，或华硕 ROG Zephyrus M16 。

更多惠普评论：

HP Omen Transcend 16 (Omen Transcend 16 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-13900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.4 GHz, 108 W PL2 / Short Burst, 86 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1980 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 130 W TDP, GDDR6, 536.67, Optimus 1.0, MUX
Memory
32 GB 
, SK hynix DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel, 46-45-45-89
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, AUOA3A6, Mini-LED, glossy: no, HDR, 240 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Storage
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N, 2048 GB 
Soundcard
Intel Raptor Lake-S PCH - cAVS
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm headset
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19.8 x 357 x 269
Battery
97 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: 1080p30
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Bang & Olufsen, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, HyperX Cloud II Core Wireless headset, Omen Gaming Hub, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.33 kg, Power Supply: 828 g
Price
2500 USD
Links
HP homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
87.9 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2023
HP Omen Transcend 16
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		2.3 kg19.8 mm16.00"2560x1600
90 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		2.1 kg19.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
Alternative specs USD 1,649.95
87.4 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
HP Omen 16-wf000
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU		2.4 kg23.6 mm16.10"2560x1440
Alternative specs USD 1,759.00
88.4 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
Alienware x16 R1
i9-13900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU		2.6 kg18.57 mm16.00"2560x1600
Alternative specs USD 3,299.99
88.1 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		2.7 kg27.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
Alternative specs USD 819.47
87.8 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2023
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU		2.1 kg19.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
Alternative specs USD 195.00

新的 16:10 外形使 Omen Transcend 16 比普通的 Omen 16 更方正，但整体厚度减少了近 4 毫米。因此，它的重量稍轻，但仍比不上 华硕 ROG Zephyrus M16或联想Legion Slim 7i 16 G8.

底盘有阴影黑和陶瓷白两种颜色可供选择
底盘有阴影黑和陶瓷白两种颜色可供选择
机身后部不像联想Legion 或华硕 ROG 那么突出
机身后部不像联想Legion 或华硕 ROG 那么突出
铰链可以完全打开 180 度，但刚度可以更好一些
铰链可以完全打开 180 度，但刚度可以更好一些
光滑的哑光镁铝机身
光滑的哑光镁铝机身
专用 Omen Gaming Hub 键
专用 Omen Gaming Hub 键
方形通风栅与 Alienware 系列的六角形通风栅形成鲜明对比
方形通风栅与 Alienware 系列的六角形通风栅形成鲜明对比

尺寸比较

❌
369 mm 259 mm 23.6 mm 2.4 kg360.1 mm 279.9 mm 27.9 mm 2.7 kg364.74 mm 289.81 mm 18.57 mm 2.6 kg357.7 mm 259.3 mm 19.9 mm 2.1 kg357 mm 269 mm 19.8 mm 2.3 kg355 mm 243 mm 19.9 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性

尽管有上述物理变化，但端口选项仍与 Omen 16 相同。不过，如果能将 1 Gbps RJ-45 升级到 2.5 Gbps，那就更好了。

正面无端口
正面无端口
右侧USB-A（5 Gbps）
右侧USB-A（5 Gbps）
后部交流适配器、千兆 RJ-45、HDMI 2.1、USB-A（5 Gbps）
后部交流适配器、千兆 RJ-45、HDMI 2.1、USB-A（5 Gbps）
左：USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2 + Thunderbolt 4 w/ Power Delivery + DisplayPort 1.4、3.5 毫米耳机
左：USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2 + Thunderbolt 4 w/ Power Delivery + DisplayPort 1.4、3.5 毫米耳机

交流

英特尔 AX211 标配 Wi-Fi 6E 和蓝牙 5.3 连接。与华硕 AXE11000 6GHz 网络配对时，我们体验到了稳定可靠的传输速率。

可拆卸 M.2 WLAN 模块
可拆卸 M.2 WLAN 模块
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1679 (1470min - 1802max) MBit/s +16%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1444 (1170min - 1766max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1347 (1002min - 1458max) MBit/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1151 (615min - 1213max) MBit/s -20%
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1115 (765min - 1228max) MBit/s -23%
Alienware x16 R1
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1022 (714min - 1142max) MBit/s -29%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1725 (1685min - 1740max) MBit/s +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1619 (1564min - 1655max) MBit/s +21%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1339 (1216min - 1449max) MBit/s
Alienware x16 R1
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1295 (1225min - 1358max) MBit/s -3%
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1295 (1173min - 1347max) MBit/s -3%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1287 (679min - 1410max) MBit/s -4%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1674 (1337min - 1789max) MBit/s +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1596 (1559min - 1632max) MBit/s +10%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1529 (1207min - 1614max) MBit/s +6%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1446 (1206min - 1531max) MBit/s
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1307 (981min - 1370max) MBit/s -10%
Alienware x16 R1
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1229 (817min - 1342max) MBit/s -15%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1726 (876min - 1760max) MBit/s +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1655 (1550min - 1681max) MBit/s +9%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1513 (1467min - 1553max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1500 (762min - 1521max) MBit/s -1%
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1344 (1298min - 1390max) MBit/s -11%
Alienware x16 R1
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1327 (955min - 1382max) MBit/s -12%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550Tooltip
HP Omen Transcend 16; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1448 (1206-1531)
HP Omen Transcend 16; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1513 (1467-1553)

网络摄像头

普通 Omen 16 不支持红外功能，而 Omen 16 则支持红外功能。此外，两款 Omen 摄像头的 200 万像素网络摄像头和隐私快门均相同。

ColorChecker
12.7 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
15 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
25 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
ColorChecker HP Omen Transcend 16: 13.68 ∆E min: 3.89 - max: 25.01 ∆E

维护

底部面板仅由六颗十字螺丝固定，方便用户使用。不过，与 Omen 16 相比，一个显著的变化是取消了第二个 M.2 固态硬盘插槽，原因是调整了 M.2 WLAN 插槽的位置，如下图所示。因此，Omen 创见 16 最多只能支持一个内部固态硬盘，而不是两个。此外，扬声器和散热方案也进行了其他微调。

2023 奥门超越 16
2023 奥门超越 16
2023 年 "预兆 16 "对比
2023 年 "预兆 16 "对比

配件和保修

某些配置包括一个免费的 HyperX Cloud II Core 无线耳机。除此之外，零售包装盒中仅包含标准交流适配器和文件。

厂商提供标准的一年有限保修服务。

输入设备 - 熟悉的预兆外观和感觉

键盘

WASD 键现在采用了半透明键帽，更具游戏美感。我们对 Omen 16 键盘的所有评论仍然适用于 Omen Transcend 16。

触摸板

点击板尺寸从最近的 Omen 16 的 12.5 x 8 厘米变为 Omen Transcend 16 的 13.5 x 8.6 厘米。虽然反应灵敏，滚动空间很大，但点击时的反馈较浅，如果能更有力一些，点击效果会更令人满意。

键盘布局和输入体验没有变化，但点击板现在比以前大了 16
键盘布局和输入体验没有变化，但点击板现在比以前大了 16
点击键盘偏软，但发出的咔嗒声相对较小
点击键盘偏软，但发出的咔嗒声相对较小
新的半透明 WASD 键让人想起华硕 ROG 笔记本电脑上的半透明 WASD 键
新的半透明 WASD 键让人想起华硕 ROG 笔记本电脑上的半透明 WASD 键
箭头键大而不拥挤，适合游戏使用
箭头键大而不拥挤，适合游戏使用

显示屏 - Mini-LED, 240 Hz, 1600p, 16:10, 1180 nits, 100% P3 Colors

哑光覆层，纹理极少
哑光覆层，纹理极少

Omen Transcend 16 和 Omen 16 之间的另一个主要区别因素是新的迷你 LED 面板选项。Mini-LED 结合了 IPS 的优势（即刷新率快、价格相对低廉）和 OLED 的优势（即亮度更高、黑度更深），是三种显示技术之间的中间选择。面板背后的 1000 个独立发光区提供了接近 OLED 独立发光像素的视觉体验。

惠普宣传的峰值亮度为 1180 尼特。我们使用HDR 亮度测试进行了独立测量 记录的最高亮度为 1233 尼特，证实了惠普的说法。请注意，只有在特定的 HDR 条件下才能达到这一最高值，类似于 华硕 VivoBook的最大亮度限制在约 800 尼特（显示全白无黑时）。即便如此，800 尼特的亮度几乎是大多数其他 IPS 笔记本电脑的 2 倍。

与同类竞争产品的迷你 LED 显示屏相比联想 Slim Pro 9 16惠普显示器的原始分辨率较低（2560 x 1600 对 3200 x 2000），但刷新率较高（240 Hz 对 165 Hz）。

显示屏对角线从 Omen 16 的 16.1 英寸 16:9 略微缩小到 Omen Transcend 16 的 16.0 英寸 16:10
显示屏对角线从 Omen 16 的 16.1 英寸 16:9 略微缩小到 Omen Transcend 16 的 16.0 英寸 16:10
侧面边框较窄，而底部边框仍然相对较厚
侧面边框较窄，而底部边框仍然相对较厚
与 IPS 不同，全黑显示时不会出现背光出血现象
与 IPS 不同，全黑显示时不会出现背光出血现象
虽然在相机上很难看到，但由于微型 LED 背光不如 OLED 那么精确，光标周围会有白光，而 OLED 的光标边缘则非常清晰。
虽然在相机上很难看到，但由于微型 LED 背光不如 OLED 那么精确，光标周围会有白光，而 OLED 的光标边缘则非常清晰。
796.9
cd/m²		814.4
cd/m²		805.5
cd/m²
777.2
cd/m²		791.1
cd/m²		783.6
cd/m²
808.7
cd/m²		810.1
cd/m²		809.9
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AUOA3A6 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 814.4 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 799.7 cd/m² Minimum: 36 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 791.1 cd/m²
Contrast: 19778:1 (Black: 0.04 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.37 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.87, calibrated: 1.04
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
87.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
HP Omen Transcend 16
AUOA3A6, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16"		Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
CSOT T3 MNG007DA2-3, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"		HP Omen 16-wf000
BOE0B7D, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1"		Alienware x16 R1
BOE NE16NZ4, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"		Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
BOE CQ NE16QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"		Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
BOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Display
-16%
-17%
0%
-18%
-4%
Display P3 Coverage
99.2
70.4
-29%
69
-30%
99.2
0%
67.9
-32%
92.8
-6%
sRGB Coverage
100
99.4
-1%
99.2
-1%
100
0%
99.1
-1%
98.5
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
87.6
72.5
-17%
71.2
-19%
88.6
1%
69.9
-20%
83.1
-5%
Response Times
62%
75%
72%
70%
68%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
26.4 ?(15, 11.4)
12 ?(6, 6)
55%
4.6 ?(2.1, 2.5)
83%
5.1 ?(2.4, 2.7)
81%
11 ?(5, 6)
58%
7.6 ?(3.4, 4.2)
71%
Response Time Black / White *
28.2 ?(21.6, 6.6)
8.9 ?(5.1, 3.8)
68%
9.7 ?(4.6, 5.1)
66%
10.3 ?(5.4, 4.9)
63%
5 ?(2, 3)
82%
10 ?(4.6, 5.4)
65%
PWM Frequency
3506 ?(100)
Screen
-95%
-86%
-67%
-95%
-79%
Brightness middle
791.1
474.6
-40%
310.9
-61%
302.2
-62%
520
-34%
497
-37%
Brightness
800
445
-44%
296
-63%
285
-64%
494
-38%
481
-40%
Brightness Distribution
95
86
-9%
91
-4%
89
-6%
91
-4%
82
-14%
Black Level *
0.04
0.39
-875%
0.35
-775%
0.26
-550%
0.39
-875%
0.21
-425%
Contrast
19778
1217
-94%
888
-96%
1162
-94%
1333
-93%
2367
-88%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.37
2.12
51%
2.18
50%
1.63
63%
1.94
56%
3.53
19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.39
4.73
54%
3.58
66%
4.13
60%
5.62
46%
6.15
41%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.04
0.57
45%
0.52
50%
1.17
-13%
0.74
29%
3.53
-239%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.5
2.8
57%
2.8
57%
2.5
62%
2.94
55%
1.74
73%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.22 99%
2.18 101%
2.23 99%
2.37 93%
2.2 100%
CCT
6000 108%
6542 99%
6002 108%
6590 99%
6443 101%
6418 101%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-16% / -56%
-9% / -48%
2% / -33%
-14% / -55%
-5% / -42%

* ... smaller is better

对比 sRGB
对比 sRGB
对 P3
对 P3

面板出厂时未经校准。色温比预期的 6000K 要高，因此饱和度较低时的色彩并不准确。使用我们的 X-Rite 色度计校准面板，可将色温提高到标准的 6500K，使所有饱和度级别的色彩更加稳定。

灰度（对 P3）
灰度（对 P3）
饱和扫描（对 P3）
饱和扫描（对 P3）
色彩校验器（与 P3 对比）
色彩校验器（与 P3 对比）
校准后的灰度
校准后的灰度
校准后的饱和扫频
校准后的饱和扫频
校准后的 ColorChecker
校准后的 ColorChecker

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
28.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.6 ms rise
↘ 6.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 11.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 3506 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 3506 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 3506 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8516 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

所有亮度下都会出现闪烁。不过，3506 Hz 的频率相对较高，对大多数用户来说应该不成问题。闪烁还会带来一个不幸的后果，即更难精确测量响应时间。

0% 亮度
0% 亮度
25% 亮度
25% 亮度
50% 亮度
50% 亮度
75% 亮度
75% 亮度
100% 亮度
100% 亮度

在阴凉处的室外能见度较好，但在较明亮的环境或阳光下，色彩仍然会变得暗淡。最大亮度约为 800 尼特，可依靠电池电量维持。

明亮阴天下的户外
明亮阴天下的户外
室外阴凉处
室外阴凉处
明亮阴天下的户外
明亮阴天下的户外
广视角。Mini-LED 没有 OLED 的彩虹效应，色彩比 IPS 更稳定
广视角。Mini-LED 没有 OLED 的彩虹效应，色彩比 IPS 更稳定

性能 - 第 13 代英特尔 Raptor Lake-HX

 
 

测试条件

在运行下面的基准测试之前，我们通过 Windows 将设备设置为 "性能模式"，并通过 Omen Gaming Hub 软件再次设置为 "性能模式"。令人恼火的是，调整一个电源配置文件设置并不会自动调整另一个。

如下截图所示，MUX 开关可通过 Omen Gaming Hub 访问。因此，强烈建议用户熟悉该软件，因为关键功能都在这里切换。性能配置文件被隐藏在多个子菜单下，这也是该软件另一个恼人之处。

不支持高级 Optimus 或 Optimus 2.0。因此，在 iGPU 和 dGPU 之间切换时需要软重启。内置显示屏支持 G-Sync。

多路复用开关选项
多路复用开关选项
电源配置文件选项
电源配置文件选项
每个按键的 RGB 设置
每个按键的 RGB 设置
预兆游戏中心主页
预兆游戏中心主页
详细的实时系统性能读数
详细的实时系统性能读数
GeForce 现在整合
GeForce 现在整合

处理器

酷睿 i9-13900HX酷睿 i9-13900HXOmen Transcend 16 中的酷睿 i9-13900HX 比我们数据库中配备相同处理器的普通笔记本电脑性能要慢 5% 到 10%。一个极端的例子是 联想Legion Pro 7尽管它们都配备了酷睿 i9-13900HX，但联想 Pro 7 的速度比惠普快 20%。我们的 Omen Transcend 16 仍是市场上速度最快的游戏笔记本之一，但根据我们使用其他高端游戏机型的经验，处理器性能肯定会更快一些。

在其他方面，性能稳定性也非常出色，在循环运行 CineBench R15 xT 时没有出现大的节流问题。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

0210420630840105012601470168018902100231025202730294031503360357037803990Tooltip
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø3989 (3846.15-4100.04)
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2707 (2663.47-2966.92)
HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX: Ø2742 (2466.4-3007.52)
Alienware x16 R1 Intel Core i9-13900HK: Ø2834 (2768.93-2949.63)
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2303 (2287.15-2328.15)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2532 (2431.02-2585.82)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
84.7 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
 
79.1 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
76.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 -1!
Intel Core i9-13900H
66.5 pt
Alienware x16 R1 -1!
Intel Core i9-13900HK
66.3 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
65.5 pt
HP Omen 16-wf000 -1!
Intel Core i7-13700HX
64.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
59.3 pt
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
53.1 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
50 pt
HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
47.4 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F
Intel Core i7-11800H
42.1 pt

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
4100 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
289 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
299 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
9895 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
805 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
25932 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
2105 Points
Help
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
 
99.6 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
95 pt
Alienware x16 R1
Intel Core i9-13900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
76.7 pt
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
76.2 pt
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70.3 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
69.9 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
68.5 pt

系统性能

除了在数字内容创建（Digital Content Creation）方面，由于我们的 RTX 4070 显卡速度较慢，PCMark 结果仅略微领先于搭载 RTX 4080 的 Omen 16。我们没有遇到从睡眠中唤醒的问题或 BSOD，这与我们最近使用的 联想超薄 Pro 9i 16.

PCMark 10 标准
PCMark 10 标准
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8538 Points +5%
Alienware x16 R1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HK, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
8365 Points +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
8153 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
7871 Points -3%
HP Omen 16-wf000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
7814 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (6956 - 8153, n=3)
7561 Points -7%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7220 Points -11%
PCMark 10 Score
8153 points
Help
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77103 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX
  (67716 - 78835, n=21)
75033 MB/s -3%
Alienware x16 R1
Intel Core i9-13900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
74460 MB/s -3%
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
63327 MB/s -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
63157 MB/s -18%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
47903 MB/s -38%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
37448 MB/s -51%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在打开主页的多个浏览器标签页时，LatencyMon 会显示轻微的 DPC 问题。在其他方面，以 60 FPS 播放 4K 视频也非常完美，完全没有掉帧现象。

延迟监控
延迟监控
驱动程序列表
驱动程序列表
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10410.4 μs * -586%
HP Omen 16-wf000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
2645.9 μs * -74%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1518 μs *
Alienware x16 R1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HK, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1391.6 μs * +8%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1312.1 μs * +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
945.7 μs * +38%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

Omen Transcend 16 配备了相同的 SK hynix PC801固态硬盘。在我们的压力测试中，该硬盘没有表现出任何性能节流问题，因此能够维持近 7000 MB/s 的最高传输速率，没有出现任何问题。

CDM 8
CDM 8
AS 固态硬盘
AS 固态硬盘
带铝质保护盖的 M.2 2280 固态硬盘
带铝质保护盖的 M.2 2280 固态硬盘
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6928 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5793 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 482.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 454.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 4613 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3559 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 57.86 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 123.9 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Alienware x16 R1
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
91.8 pt
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
79.9 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
69.4 pt
HP Omen 16-wf000
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
65.5 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
63.3 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
58.6 pt

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035070010501400175021002450280031503500385042004550490052505600595063006650Tooltip
HP Omen Transcend 16: Ø6898 (5515.51-6944.88)

GPU 性能 - 130 瓦 TGP GPU

图形性能与我们数据库中配备相同移动 RTX 4070 的普通笔记本电脑相当。 移动 RTX 4070图形处理器。不过联想Legion Slim 7i 16 G8的部分原因是其 TGP 目标值略高（145 W 对 130 W）。

降级到 RTX 4060SKU 图形性能将降低约 10%至 20%。同时 RTX 4080可将性能大幅提升 40% 至 50%，但 Omen Transcend 16 目前仅限于 RTX 4070。相比之下，普通的 Omen 16 可以配置比 RTX 4070 更大的 GPU 选项。

如下表Fire Strike 所示，在平衡模式而非性能模式下运行只会略微降低性能。这一点很重要，因为平衡模式和性能模式之间的风扇噪音差异很大，我们将在系统噪音部分进行说明。

电源配置文件图形分数物理得分综合得分
均衡26079 (-5%)33864 (-0%)8226 (-24%)
成绩273433393610832


Fire Strike (平衡简介）
Fire Strike (平衡简介）
Fire Strike (业绩简介）
Fire Strike (业绩简介）
Fire Strike 超
Fire Strike 超
Time Spy
Time Spy
皇家港
皇家港
快速通道
快速通道
3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX Gamer
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
100 pt
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
89.5 pt
HP Omen 16-wf000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
77.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
57.2 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
53.1 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
53 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H
45.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z -2!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
44.4 pt
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 -1!
AMD Radeon RX 6800S, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
41.1 pt
HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Radeon RX 6650M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
37.7 pt
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W -2!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
36.7 pt
HP Omen 15-en0375ng -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
27 pt
3DMark 11 Performance
32031 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
24341 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
12436 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (n=1)
330 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Radeon RX 6800S, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
75 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
37 Seconds * -95%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
28 Seconds * -47%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H
25 Seconds * -32%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (18 - 30, n=67)
21.4 Seconds * -13%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
19 Seconds * -0%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
19 Seconds *
HP Omen 16-wf000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
17 Seconds * +11%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
13 Seconds * +32%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX Gamer
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
11 Seconds * +42%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
62 Seconds * -72%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
45 Seconds * -25%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H
44 Seconds * -22%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
36 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (32 - 50, n=66)
34.9 Seconds * +3%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
32 Seconds * +11%
HP Omen 16-wf000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
22 Seconds * +39%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
20 Seconds * +44%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX Gamer
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
19 Seconds * +47%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
HP Omen 16-n0033dx
AMD Radeon RX 6650M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
394 Seconds * -77%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Radeon RX 6800S, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
361 Seconds * -63%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
329 Seconds * -48%
Asus ZenBook Pro 16X OLED UX7602ZM-ME115W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
315 Seconds * -42%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H
307 Seconds * -38%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
297 Seconds * -34%
HP Omen 16-wf000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
290 Seconds * -31%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (158 - 440, n=66)
289 Seconds * -30%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
222 Seconds *
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
147 Seconds * +34%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

所有游戏均可在原生 QHD+ 分辨率下以高至最高设置进行游戏，甚至包括《Returnal 》或《赛博朋克 2077》等要求苛刻的游戏。如果启用 RT 功能或在外部 4K 显示器上播放，仍建议使用 DLSS。

Returnal | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | F1 22 | The Witcher 3 | Dota 2 Reborn | Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | X-Plane 11.11 | Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | Strange Brigade
Returnal
1920x1080 Low Preset
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX Gamer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
190 fps +74%
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
148 (42min) fps +36%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
109 (25min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (65 - 119, n=11)
99.2 fps -9%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83 (12min) fps -24%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX Gamer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
184 fps +60%
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
148 (76min) fps +29%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115 (12min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (69 - 117, n=12)
99.4 fps -14%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
81 (21min) fps -30%
1920x1080 High Preset
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX Gamer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
170 fps +68%
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
136 (41min) fps +35%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
101 (31min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (64 - 106, n=12)
91.3 fps -10%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76 (16min) fps -25%
1920x1080 Epic Preset
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX Gamer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
146 fps +85%
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
107 (46min) fps +35%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
79 (16min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (54 - 90, n=12)
77.4 fps -2%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
61 (8min) fps -23%
2560x1440 Epic Preset
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX Gamer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
111 fps +73%
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
91 (38min) fps +42%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
64 (19min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (39 - 66, n=12)
57.6 fps -10%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
52 (12min) fps -19%
3840x2160 Epic Preset
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX Gamer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
66 fps +78%
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
53 (31min) fps +43%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
37 (17min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (21 - 39, n=8)
29.9 fps -19%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
27 (8min) fps -27%

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø105.7 (97-112)
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 500.9 375.9 222.7 111.8 65.7
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 212 192 188.4 168.4 142.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 220 164.8 82.6 47.1
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 191.5 169.8 132.9 114
Strange Brigade (2018) 414 310 245 208 133.3 71.4
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) 128.5 118.1 103 87.5 54.5 23.5
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) 241.7 195.6 132.5 102 70.4 33.6
F1 22 (2022) 301 289 221 79.3 50.4 24.7
Returnal (2023) 109 115 101 79 64 37

排放量

系统噪声 - 平衡模式与性能模式之间的巨大差异

整体风扇噪音比我们在 Omen 16 上体验到的噪音略小。 奥门 16但值得注意的是，Omen 16 配备了速度更快的 RTX 4080 GPU，其 TGP 为 145 W，而我们的 RTX 4070 GPU 的 TGP 为 130 W。

在性能模式下进行游戏时，风扇噪音可高达 54.3 dB(A)，而在平衡模式下仅为 42 dB(A)。如上所述，你会损失一些性能，但噪音的显著降低可能值得考虑。此外，50 分贝（A）左右的游戏音量也可与其他产品媲美，如Alienware x16 R1.

冷却解决方案包括两个 ~55 至 ~60 毫米风扇和四个热管
冷却解决方案包括两个 ~55 至 ~60 毫米风扇和四个热管
在性能模式下，风扇噪音非常大，但在平衡模式下，噪音还算合理。
在性能模式下，风扇噪音非常大，但在平衡模式下，噪音还算合理。
无气室或液态金属冷却
无气室或液态金属冷却
可访问 2x SODIMM
可访问 2x SODIMM
风扇噪音曲线（白色：背景，红色：系统空闲，蓝色：3DMark 06，橙色：3DMark 06，绿色：3DMark 06，橙色：3DMark 06Witcher 3绿色Prime95+FurMark 压力）
风扇噪音曲线（白色：背景，红色：系统空闲，蓝色：3DMark 06，橙色：3DMark 06，绿色：3DMark 06，橙色：3DMark 06Witcher 3绿色Prime95+FurMark 压力）

Noise Level

Idle
29.1 / 29.1 / 29.1 dB(A)
Load
45.7 / 54.3 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 22.9 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.835.43335.733.62529.429.727.428.830.13125.526.823.828.327.14027.726.522.222.628.85028.626.3222129.26327.425.12019.426.58028.722.320.318.829.510030.42316.616.929.712530.526.618.115.430.216031.327.117.112.331.920033.727.518.612.335.125036.630.119.212.236.431537.231.118.812.537.140038.830.116.911.638.350038.432.218.310.638.963039.331.616.79.739.480040.431.516.19.640.6100041.933.917.29.641.8125043.735.618.49.544160044.436.520.19.944.3200044.536.620.310.144.3250044.936.418.610.344.9315044.836.115.210.944.7400042.631.812.611.142.3500039.627.712.411.639.7630038.526.41311.638.6800036.323.512.911.736.21000034.220.512.211.634.11250029.416.311.811.629.41600026.813.91110.926.6SPL54.345.729.122.954.3N9.54.910.49.5median 38.5median 30.1median 16.9median 11.6median 38.6Delta5.64.92.81.15.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N		Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR		HP Omen 16-wf000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N		Alienware x16 R1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HK, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N		Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR		Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
Noise
13%
1%
9%
6%
-2%
off / environment *
22.9
22.8
-0%
23
-0%
22.7
1%
25.7
-12%
23
-0%
Idle Minimum *
29.1
23.6
19%
29.6
-2%
23.1
21%
25.7
12%
23
21%
Idle Average *
29.1
23.6
19%
29.8
-2%
25.8
11%
25.7
12%
24
18%
Idle Maximum *
29.1
25.7
12%
30.4
-4%
25.8
11%
26.3
10%
47
-62%
Load Average *
45.7
27.6
40%
33.8
26%
39.3
14%
33.9
26%
47.91
-5%
Witcher 3 ultra *
54.3
54.4
-0%
57
-5%
49.9
8%
48.91
10%
Load Maximum *
54.3
54.4
-0%
58.3
-7%
54.8
-1%
62
-14%
50.25
7%

* ... smaller is better

温度

由于内部采用了对称散热解决方案，键盘表面温度以中心温度最高。游戏时，键盘中心温度可达 40 至 45 摄氏度，底部温度更高。不过，这个范围仍与Legion Slim 7i 16 G8.笔记本电脑的其他部分温度较低，包括掌托、WASD 键和方向键，这些地方在游戏时皮肤接触较多。

四组通风栅
四组通风栅
长时间游戏后，交流适配器温度超过 47 C
长时间游戏后，交流适配器温度超过 47 C
Max. Load
 42.8 °C47.4 °C41 °C 
 36.2 °C44.8 °C38.6 °C 
 27.4 °C26.2 °C29.6 °C 
Maximum: 47.4 °C
Average: 37.1 °C
51 °C54.4 °C43.4 °C
41.6 °C46.8 °C38.4 °C
32 °C33.8 °C30.6 °C
Maximum: 54.4 °C
Average: 41.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  45.2 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.4 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54.4 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.6 °C / 85.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.7 °C / -1.3 F).
系统空闲（顶部）
系统空闲（顶部）
系统空闲（底部）
系统空闲（底部）
Witcher 3 压力（上）
Witcher 3 压力（上）
Witcher 3 压力（底部）
Witcher 3 压力（底部）
Prime95+FurMark 压力（上）
Prime95+FurMark 压力（上）
Prime95+FurMark 应力（底部）
Prime95+FurMark 应力（底部）
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU		Alienware x16 R1
Intel Core i9-13900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU		Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat
-1%
3%
-10%
-3%
-5%
Maximum Upper Side *
47.4
49.8
-5%
45
5%
47.2
-0%
41.5
12%
52
-10%
Maximum Bottom *
54.4
48.8
10%
48.8
10%
47.8
12%
51.8
5%
51
6%
Idle Upper Side *
28.4
29.4
-4%
29.2
-3%
36.8
-30%
31.6
-11%
29
-2%
Idle Bottom *
29.2
30
-3%
28.8
1%
35.8
-23%
34.5
-18%
33
-13%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

系统空闲
系统空闲

在运行 Prime95 压力测试时，CPU 的频率会升至 3.1 GHz，功耗为 101 W，然后迅速下降并稳定在 2.4 GHz 和 84 W 左右，以保持 81 C 的合理核心温度。

在性能模式下运行时，Nvidia GPU 将分别稳定在 2115 MHz、86 C 和 94 W。 Witcher 3性能模式。如果在平衡模式下，GPU 的频率将降至 2085 MHz、76 C 和 86 W。与 130 瓦的 TGP 目标值相比，我们只能达到 105 瓦的实际 GPU 功耗峰值。

使用电池供电限制了性能。Fire Strike ，物理和图形得分分别为 21003 分和 17627 分，而使用电源时分别为 33936 分和 27343 分。

Witcher 3 (平衡模式）
Witcher 3 (平衡模式）
Witcher 3 (性能模式）
Witcher 3 (性能模式）
Prime95 压力
Prime95 压力
Prime95+FurMark 压力
Prime95+FurMark 压力
CPU 时钟 (GHz) GPU 时钟 (MHz) CPU 平均温度 (°C) GPU 平均温度(°C)
系统闲置 -- -- 48 38
Prime95 压力 ~2.0 - 2.4 -- 81 56
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 ~1.5 1605 94 87
Witcher 3 压力（平衡模式） ~0.7 2085 80 77
Witcher 3 压力（性能模式） ~0.7 2115 97 87

发言人

前角附近有向下发射的立体声扬声器
前角附近有向下发射的立体声扬声器
粉红噪声显示出不错的最大音量，但低音重现效果不佳
粉红噪声显示出不错的最大音量，但低音重现效果不佳
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.63332.62525.727.425.73122.623.822.64022.422.222.45022.82222.86320.32020.38019.820.319.810024.116.624.112535.518.135.516045.517.145.520053.318.653.325057.319.257.331562.218.862.240062.216.962.250064.118.364.163068.316.768.380071.316.171.3100072.517.272.5125073.618.473.6160072.620.172.6200074.620.374.6250069.118.669.1315067.815.267.8400062.312.662.3500066.112.466.16300681368800066.312.966.31000069.712.269.71250067.611.867.61600061.31161.3SPL82.329.182.3N53.5153.5median 66.3median 16.9median 66.3Delta6.12.86.126.325.821.422.12624.925.127.622.532.523.448.72655.818.860.922.167.2267019.372.317.674.217.774.319.575.31571.711.871.311.27410.574.21072.710.17210.67210.97511.374.811.671.71269.71269.612.371.112.669.61270.111.269.824.784.70.666.6median 12median 71.73.42.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Omen Transcend 16Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Omen Transcend 16 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

能源管理

耗电量 - 怠速时数值较高

与 Omen 16 相比，我们的 Omen Transcend 16 配备了速度更快的 CPU，但 GPU 速度较慢，因此两者的平均功耗大致相同。如果只对 CPU 或 GPU 施加压力，它们之间的差异会更加明显。例如，我们的 Omen 创见 16 在运行 Prime95 时会多消耗约 15 到 20 瓦的电能，而在运行 FurMark 时则会少消耗约 15 瓦的电能。

在 "性能 "配置文件下，台式机的空转功耗可高达 55 W。众所周知，Mini-LED 一般比标准 IPS 要求更高。

当 CPU 和 GPU 的使用率均为 100% 时，我们可以记录到中型（约 18 x 8.7 x 2.6 厘米）280 W AC 适配器的最大功耗为 292 W。大约一分钟后，耗电量将稳定在 240 W 范围内。

3DMark 06 消耗量
3DMark 06 消耗量
Witcher 3 1080p 消耗量
Witcher 3 1080p 消耗量
在启动 Prime95 压力时，功耗会飙升至 203 W，然后由于 Turbo Boost 的限制而略有下降，并稳定在 181 W。
在启动 Prime95 压力时，功耗会飙升至 203 W，然后由于 Turbo Boost 的限制而略有下降，并稳定在 181 W。
Prime95+FurMark 在 10 秒处启动应力测试
Prime95+FurMark 在 10 秒处启动应力测试
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.08 / 5.4 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 19.2 / 22.7 / 55.4 Watt
Load midlight 128.4 / 292 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Omen Transcend 16
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16"		Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"		HP Omen 16-wf000
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1"		Alienware x16 R1
i9-13900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"		Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"		Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Power Consumption
9%
3%
-12%
29%
34%
Idle Minimum *
19.2
22
-15%
21.8
-14%
25.2
-31%
11.6
40%
10.8
44%
Idle Average *
22.7
29
-28%
26
-15%
29.9
-32%
15.6
31%
17
25%
Idle Maximum *
55.4
39.5
29%
36
35%
49.8
10%
16.5
70%
17.8
68%
Load Average *
128.4
98.7
23%
115.5
10%
105.4
18%
155
-21%
116
10%
Witcher 3 ultra *
206
171.8
17%
214
-4%
263
-28%
154.8
25%
144
30%
Load Maximum *
292
213.2
27%
269.7
8%
313.8
-7%
205
30%
220
25%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255270285Tooltip
HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø206 (187.4-239)
HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø214 (202-221)
HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø253 (213-291)
HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø240 (206-270)
HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø26.3 (21.5-46.4)
HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø23.2 (14.4-29.1)

Power Consumption external Monitor

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø188.4 (171.7-203)
HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø180.9 (162.9-201)
HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø192.8 (169.3-198.3)
HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø177.7 (169-200)
HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø186.3 (175.4-207)
HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø204 (192.5-218)
HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø196.4 (176.7-230)
HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø209 (201-218)
HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø20.3 (8.23-37.8)
HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø22.1 (13.3-29.6)

电池寿命

交流适配器
交流适配器

电池容量从 Omen 16 的 83 Wh 增加到 Omen Transcend 16 的 97 Wh。尽管如此，由于采用了要求更高的微型 LED 面板，电池续航时间仍然较短。在使用 iGPU 的情况下，我们在平衡电源模式下的 WLAN 实际浏览时间仅为 4 个多小时，而 Omen 16 在类似设置下的实际浏览时间接近 5 个小时。

使用随附的交流适配器从空闲状态充至满电需要约 90 分钟。系统也可通过 USB-C 接口充电，但容量较低的适配器可能无法使用。例如，我们的 65 W USB-C 交流适配器会产生兼容性错误信息，而我们的 135 W USB-C 适配器则可以顺利充电。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
6h 15min
WiFi Websurfing
4h 10min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 13min
HP Omen Transcend 16
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh		Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh		HP Omen 16-wf000
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh		Alienware x16 R1
i9-13900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh		Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41
R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh		Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Battery Runtime
-13%
1%
-21%
85%
48%
Reader / Idle
375
305
-19%
328
-13%
436
16%
729
94%
WiFi v1.3
250
261
4%
307
23%
149
-40%
540
116%
445
78%
Load
73
55
-25%
68
-7%
44
-40%
105
44%
86
18%
H.264
614
436

Pros

+ 超亮迷你 led 显示屏，亮度可达 800 至 1200 尼特
+ 深黑色级别，全 P3 色彩
+ 比 Omen 16 更轻更薄
+ 易于维护
+ 更大的点击板

Cons

- 仅支持一个内置固态硬盘
- 不支持高级 Optimus
- 没有GeForce RTX 4080 选项
- 铰链可以更坚固
- 电池寿命一般

评价--出色的设计和独特的迷你 LED 显示屏，但GeForce RTX 4080 在哪里？

回顾：HP Omen Transcend 16。测试机由惠普提供
回顾：HP Omen Transcend 16。测试机由惠普提供

与标准版 Omen 16 相比，Omen Transcend 16 进行了多项升级，包括红外传感器、16:10 宽高比、更大容量的电池和迷你 LED 显示器选项。后者可能是最独特的，因为该机型是首批配备 QHD+ 240 Hz mini-LED 显示屏的机型之一，其观看体验不同于大多数仍在使用 IPS 和 OLED 的游戏笔记本电脑。重视亮度和 HDR1000 功能的用户会特别欣赏迷你 LED 显示屏的优势。

Omen Transcend 16 采用更快的 CPU 和更轻薄的机身，从而放弃了更高的 GPU 选项。同时，它的 Mini-LED 显示屏亮度极高，可呈现任何游戏笔记本电脑上最鲜艳的 HDR 内容。

最新机型并不一定比普通的 Omen 16 更好，因为它省略了一些重要功能。首先，Omen Transcend 16 只支持一个内部固态硬盘，而 Omen 16 可以支持两个。其次，或许也是最重要的一点，Omen Transcend 16 最大支持 130 WGeForce RTX 4070 GPU，而 Omen 16 最高可配置 145 WGeForce RTX 4080。对 GPU 的限制可能是由于 Omen Transcend 16 采用了更薄的机身和更高的酷睿 i9-13900HX CPU。因此，喜欢更快 GPU 性能的用户可能会考虑 普通 Omen 16而喜欢更快 CPU 性能的用户则可以考虑 Omen Transcend 16。

价格和供应情况

惠普的 Omen Transcend 16目前已开始发货，基础版酷睿 i7-13700HX 和 RTX 4050 配置的起价为 1250 美元，我们的评测配置起价为 2500 美元。

HP Omen Transcend 16 - 08/04/2023 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo

Chassis
84 / 98 → 86%
Keyboard
83%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
69 / 80 → 86%
Weight
61 / 10-66 → 91%
Battery
59 / 95 → 62%
Display
89%
Games Performance
99%
Application Performance
97%
Temperature
88 / 95 → 92%
Noise
71 / 90 → 79%
Audio
76%
Camera
41 / 85 → 48%
Average
77%
88%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普 Omen Transcend 16 笔记本电脑评测：不仅仅是名称上的细微差别
Allen Ngo, 2023-08- 5 (Update: 2024-08-15)