Notebookcheck Logo

索尼Xperia 5 IV评测--有个性的智能手机

仅仅是不同。

索尼在Xperia 5 IV上做了许多不同的事情。这款手机有一个音频插孔，一个microSD读卡器和一个装在紧凑机身中的Snapdragon 8 Gen 1。这家日本公司做出了完美的智能手机吗？
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

即使在我们回顾索尼Xperia 5 III时，这款小巧的设备就以其强大的硬件给我们留下了非常深刻的印象。索尼现在发布了Xperia 5 IV，这款手机旨在解决其前辈的不足之处。该设备拥有21:9的长宽比、音频插孔和微型SD卡的扩展槽等功能。

索尼只提供一种配置的手机（128GB存储空间和8GB内存），但它有三种颜色可供选择：白色、深绿色和黑色。

Sony Xperia 5 IV (Xperia 5 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 730
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.10 inch 21:9, 2520 x 1080 pixel 449 PPI, capacitive, OLED, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 104 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, 0 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass, colour spectrum
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66), 5G (Band n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n28, n38, n40, n41, n77, n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 156 x 68
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (f/1.7, 24mm, 1/1.7", 1.8µm) 12MPix (f/2.4, 60mm, 1/3.5") 12MPix (f/2.2, 16mm); Camera2-API-Level: Full
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix f/2.0, 24mm, 1/2.9", 1.25µm
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: On-screen, Xperia UI, 24 Months Warranty, Head SAR: 0.87 W/kg, Body SAR: 0.83 W/kg; GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1), Beidou (B1, B1C); DRM Widevine L1, fanless, waterproof
Weight
171 g
Price
1049 Euro
Links
Sony homepage
Sony notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
89.2 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2022
Sony Xperia 5 IV
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730		171 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2520x1080
89.2 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2022
Apple iPhone 14
A15, A15 GPU 5-Core		172 g128 GB NVMe6.10"2532x1170
89.1 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2022
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7		212 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3120x1440
88.9 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920		196 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.60"2340x1080
88.1 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2022
OnePlus 10 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730		200.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3216x1440
89.3 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2022
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730		198.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080

Xperia 5 IV是由玻璃和金属制成的。显示屏和背面都有一层康宁大猩猩玻璃Victus保护。后面和金属框架有一个哑光的表面。尽管是黑色，我们的评测单元几乎没有吸引任何指纹。

这款手机有很好的配合和完成度。机身上的缝隙小而均匀；按钮牢牢地坐在位置上，按起来感觉很好。唯一的问题是，音量摇杆在机身中略有晃动。Xperia 5 IV有一个独特的SIM卡托盘，不需要任何工具就能取出。

这款智能手机具有IP65/68等级，意味着它可以防潮和防尘。该设备保留了与前代产品相同的设计。索尼已经决定取消前置摄像头的冲孔或凹槽，而是选择在屏幕周围采用老式的、更厚的边框。这为前置立体声扬声器提供了空间。

尺寸比较

❌
162.9 mm 76.6 mm 8.9 mm 212 g163 mm 73.9 mm 8.6 mm 200.5 g161.76 mm 73.5 mm 8.39 mm 198.5 g157.4 mm 75.8 mm 7.6 mm 196 g156 mm 68 mm 8.2 mm 171 g146.7 mm 71.5 mm 7.8 mm 172 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

规格 - 音频插孔和微型SD卡插槽

索尼Xperia 5 IV只提供128GB的内部存储。那些需要更多空间的人将高兴地看到一个微型SD插槽，可兼容高达1TB的卡。

索尼在该设备的顶部放置了一个3.5毫米音频插孔。还有一个支持当前标准（3.2 Gen 1）的USB-C端口。

这款手机除了有一个永远在线的显示屏外，还有一个通知LED。此外，它还支持NFC以及双卡（物理SIM和eSIM）。两者都可用于访问5G网络。

顶部：麦克风、音频插孔
顶部：麦克风、音频插孔
右边。相机按钮，带指纹传感器的电源按钮，音量摇杆
右边。相机按钮，带指纹传感器的电源按钮，音量摇杆
左边：没有按钮
左边：没有按钮
底部。SIM卡插槽、麦克风、USB接口
底部。SIM卡插槽、麦克风、USB接口

微型SD卡读卡器

索尼Xperia 5 IV支持存储量高达1TB的microSD卡。在我们的测试中，该手机在使用我们的参考卡Angelbird AV Pro V60时表现出缓慢的传输速度。在跨平台磁盘测试中，它也提供了相当糟糕的结果，比它的前任表现更差。 前辈而且大大差于 华硕Zenfone 8 Flip.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus Zenfone 8 Flip
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
39.93 MB/s +219%
Sony Xperia 5 III
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
15.5 MB/s +24%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
12.53 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Sony Xperia 5 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø23.6 (18.8-29.1)
Sony Xperia 5 III Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø20.9 (5.29-28.6)
Asus Zenfone 8 Flip Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø52.3 (40-66.8)
Sony Xperia 5 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø37.7 (30.9-51.4)
Sony Xperia 5 III Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø42.5 (35.5-65.2)
Asus Zenfone 8 Flip Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø88.4 (33.9-108)

软件--几乎是香草味的Android

在我们审查期间，Xperia 5 IV运行在Android 12，并有一个2022年10月1日的安全补丁。该操作系统在大多数情况下是库存Android ，有一些由索尼实现的额外功能。

"侧面感应 "是一项功能，允许你双击屏幕的侧面，在弹出的窗口中显示手机认为你可能想使用的应用程序列表。此外，可以在多窗口模式下同时打开两个应用程序，并调整每个窗口的大小。这些功能可以通过一个你可以调出的栏来访问。

这款手机配备了一个 "游戏增强器 "应用程序，当你打开一个游戏时自动启动。在你玩游戏时，一个弹出式图标将保持可见。点击该图标将让你快速访问显示和音量设置、流媒体工具和性能模式。

Xperia 5 IV支持Widevine Level 1，从而使你可以在手机上流传高清内容。Camera2 API处于完全支持水平。除了谷歌和索尼制作的应用程序，该手机几乎没有预装任何第三方应用程序，只有Facebook和LinkedIn。

连接性和GNSS - 支持Wi-Fi 6E

索尼Xperia 5 IV支持Wi-Fi 6E，在我们的参考路由器--华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000的支持下，实现了快速而稳定的传输速度。它在我们的比较中领先于其他智能手机，除了 摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra.

这款手机还兼容广泛的移动频率，总共支持12个5G和25个LTE频段。在测试过程中，我们没有发现任何关于接收的问题。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
944 (859min - 952max) MBit/s +62%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
904 (453min - 912max) MBit/s +55%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
881 (446min - 922max) MBit/s +51%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
826 (765min - 881max) MBit/s +42%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
746 (642min - 765max) MBit/s +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=191, last 2 years)
711 MBit/s +22%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
582 (509min - 645max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
945 (917min - 968max) MBit/s +3%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
918 (876min - 949max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
899 (432min - 966max) MBit/s -2%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
894 (834min - 918max) MBit/s -3%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
893 (835min - 941max) MBit/s -3%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
839 (531min - 913max) MBit/s -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=193, last 2 years)
725 MBit/s -21%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1728 (880min - 1819max) MBit/s
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1657 (1379min - 1781max) MBit/s -4%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1645 (1586min - 1695max) MBit/s -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (229 - 1945, n=80, last 2 years)
1443 MBit/s -16%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1346 (696min - 1430max) MBit/s -22%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1743 (1585min - 1798max) MBit/s +12%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1565 (777min - 1666max) MBit/s 0%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1563 (1447min - 1601max) MBit/s
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1522 (1278min - 1606max) MBit/s -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (668 - 1864, n=80, last 2 years)
1387 MBit/s -11%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Sony Xperia 5 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1699 (880-1819)
Sony Xperia 5 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1562 (1447-1601)
Sony Xperia 5 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø582 (509-645)
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø944 (859-952)
Sony Xperia 5 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø918 (876-949)
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø893 (835-941)

我们带着Xperia 5 IV和我们的参考设备（Garmin Venu 2）一起去骑车。索尼手机在绘制路线方面做得很好，准确地跟踪了所有的转弯和弯道。然而，这款手机在室内建立卫星连接的时间稍长。

在实际使用中，尽管手机只支持单频GNSS，但集成的GPS芯片在谷歌地图等应用中提供了快速和可靠的导航。

GNSS试骑。绕湖而行
GNSS试骑。绕湖而行
全球卫星导航系统试乘。转折点
全球卫星导航系统试乘。转折点
全球卫星导航系统试骑。总结
全球卫星导航系统试骑。总结

电话功能和语音质量 - 清晰的语音传输

Xperia 5 IV的语音质量很好。用户和另一端的人的声音都很清晰，没有任何干扰。这款手机能够很好地抑制背景噪音，而且耳边的扬声器也足够响亮。即使在使用内置免提模式时，该设备也能提供很好的音质。

索尼安装了谷歌的官方电话呼叫应用程序，它的界面清晰易懂。在音频输出方面，该公司提供了额外的功能。你可以使用 "360现实音频 "来个性化你的听觉体验。Xperia还配备了风噪降低功能。

相机 - Xperia提供四个1200万像素传感器

用索尼Xperia 5 IV拍摄的自拍照
用索尼Xperia 5 IV拍摄的自拍照

索尼并不打算在百万像素数量方面追求任何记录。这款手机上的所有四个摄像头的最大分辨率为1200万像素。后面的镜头的焦距为16、24和60毫米。Xperia 5 IV仍然保留了一个超广角和一个变焦摄像头，但其前身的可变变焦功能这次被放弃。所有镜头都是与蔡司合作为手机进行微调的，并采用蔡司T*涂层。

1200万像素的前置摄像头比之前的Xperia 5上的800万像素前置摄像头有所升级。它产生的图像大多是漂亮、锐利、色彩自然的。有时可能会出现云雾缭绕的情况，这取决于光线的落差。

前置摄像头可以录制高质量的视频，分辨率最高可达4K。即使在最高分辨率下，图像稳定功能也很出色。此外，该手机提供连续自动对焦，能够跟踪人类和动物。

同样，背面的摄像头能够拍摄4K视频，声音和图像质量令人印象深刻。没有卡顿，图像稳定效果也非常好。录制视频时，你甚至可以在摄像头之间切换。这就是说，过渡是相当生硬的。

虽然在Xperia 5 IV上拍摄的图像有很好的色彩还原，但它们可以更清晰一些（尤其是那些用超宽摄像头拍摄的图像）。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera: rabbitMain camera: lakeUltrawide camera5X zoomLow-light photo

使用ColorChecker分析相机，我们发现用Xperia 5 IV拍摄的图像通常具有相当的色彩准确性。颜色看起来很自然，但灰色的阴影与参考颜色的偏差较大。在弱光下（一勒克斯），对于这个价位的手机来说，色差是非常大的。

测试的图像看起来很清晰，只是在边缘处变得比较柔和。在一勒克斯条件下拍摄的照片仍然可以看出细节，但图像的噪音很大。

ColorChecker
7.8 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Sony Xperia 5 IV: 6.47 ∆E min: 2.77 - max: 11.94 ∆E
ColorChecker
29 ∆E
51.9 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
60.8 ∆E
51.4 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
40.1 ∆E
29 ∆E
62.5 ∆E
63.2 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
47.2 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
73.1 ∆E
41.4 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
76.1 ∆E
68.8 ∆E
51.2 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Sony Xperia 5 IV: 45.04 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 76.15 ∆E

配件和保修--连USB线都没有了

盒子里的东西非常不值一提。除了手机本身，你只能找到一份快速入门指南。没有充电器，甚至没有USB线。同样也不包括SIM卡弹出工具，因为SIM卡托盘不需要工具就可以取出。

索尼在德国为Xperia 5 IV提供两年的保修期。保修的条款和条件可能因国家而异。

输入设备和操作 - 可靠的指纹传感器

索尼Xperia 5 IV使用谷歌的Gboard作为其默认键盘。尽管显示屏很窄，但在手机上打字的效果非常好，大多没有任何错误。

显示屏本身非常好用，触摸起来非常顺滑。有一个单手模式，实际上使高大的显示屏更容易用一只手操作。

该设备可以使用模式、密码或PIN码进行解锁。索尼还将指纹传感器集成到电源按钮中。使用指纹解锁手机是一个非常可靠的过程。手机会振动一次，以确认检测到手指，但在解锁屏幕之前会暂停片刻。在本评论发表时，Xperia 5 IV不支持面部解锁。

显示器 - 索尼采用了明亮的OLED面板

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

索尼Xperia 5 IV采用6.1英寸OLED面板，长宽比为21：9。由于面板的性质，它在测试期间设法给我们留下了完美的黑色水平和奇妙的对比度。屏幕也变得令人愉快的明亮。在启用环境光传感器的情况下，我们测量的最大亮度为922cd/m²；在关闭传感器的情况下，面板的亮度达到了603cd/m²。这意味着索尼手机的屏幕比iPhone 14的屏幕略微明亮。 iPhone 14的显示屏，但像素7 Pro, Galaxy S22+和 Edge 30 Ultra甚至可以得到比这更高的亮度。

该面板具有均匀的亮度分布，支持高达120Hz的刷新率。用户也可以将显示器设置为始终以120Hz运行，或者让软件自动调整刷新率。然而，你不能手动选择其他固定刷新率。根据应用程序DRM Info，该面板只能显示60Hz或120Hz的内容--其他刷新率不可用。

该显示器支持10点多点触摸。在测试中，我们检测到频率在120Hz和475Hz之间的PWM闪烁。这种闪烁发生在面板的整个亮度范围内，而且没有直流调光模式。另一方面，我们没有检测到任何时间上的抖动。

899
cd/m²		899
cd/m²		911
cd/m²
900
cd/m²		896
cd/m²		910
cd/m²
900
cd/m²		890
cd/m²		913
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 913 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 902 cd/m² Minimum: 1.99 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 896 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Sony Xperia 5 IV
OLED, 2520x1080, 6.1"		Apple iPhone 14
OLED, 2532x1170, 6.1"		Google Pixel 7 Pro
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.7"		Samsung Galaxy S22+
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"		OnePlus 10 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.7"		Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
pOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen
-2%
28%
-3%
17%
12%
Brightness middle
896
835
-7%
1022
14%
1090
22%
793
-11%
1020
14%
Brightness
902
841
-7%
1025
14%
1097
22%
776
-14%
1020
13%
Brightness Distribution
97
97
0%
99
2%
98
1%
95
-2%
96
-1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2
1.05
47%
0.9
55%
2.5
-25%
0.79
60%
1
50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.4
2.81
56%
2.1
67%
3.8
41%
1.93
70%
2.8
56%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.3
2.6
-100%
1.1
15%
2.3
-77%
1.3
-0%
2.1
-62%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.034 108%
2.22 99%
2.04 108%
2.223 99%
2.29 96%
CCT
6618 98%
6616 98%
6650 98%
6492 100%
6624 98%
6502 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 475 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 475 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 475 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最小屏幕亮度
分钟。
25%的屏幕亮度
25%
50%的屏幕亮度
50%
75%的屏幕亮度
75%
最大的手动屏幕亮度
100%

在色彩还原方面，Xperia 5 IV的显示屏既有优点也有缺点。虽然灰度的色差在不易察觉的范围内，但在色彩的再现方面有一些问题。特别是黄色，明显偏离了参考值，其饱和度也超出了可接受的范围，使显示器有轻微的黄色调。

也就是说，只有当你将屏幕与其他显示器进行比较时，你才会注意到这一点。比较中的其他手机的色差较小。

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.06 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5445 ms rise
↘ 0.511 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.024 ms rise
↘ 1.771 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

显示屏足够明亮，适合户外使用。而且，即使在明亮的阳光下，面板也很容易阅读。

由于显示器的广视角，即使从非常尖锐的角度观看，你也能轻易地看清屏幕上的内容。色彩也得到了适当的渲染。

性能 - Xperia 5始终运行流畅

索尼Xperia 5 IV配备了 骁龙8代1（集成了 阿德雷诺730GPU）和8GB的RAM。这一组合在日常使用中提供了令人印象深刻的流畅性能。应用程序立即启动，在打开的应用程序之间切换是小菜一碟。快速的120Hz显示屏加强了这种速度感。

尽管有相同的SoC，但Xperia 5 IV的性能基本上不如 一加10 Pro，而 摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra采用较新的 骁龙8+第一代.索尼Xperia稍稍领先于 像素7 Pro和 三星Galaxy S22+.这使Xperia 5 IV在我们的比较中处于中间位置。

Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1732 Points +47%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1328 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1181 - 1298, n=21)
1231 Points +4%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1211 Points +3%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1181 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1133 Points -4%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1048 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=175, last 2 years)
1040 Points -12%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
4733 Points +38%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4251 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3599 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (3269 - 3839, n=21)
3548 Points +4%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3521 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=175, last 2 years)
3474 Points +1%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
3425 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
3222 Points -6%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1073804 Points +18%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1011412 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (692924 - 1041980, n=18)
928953 Points +2%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
910383 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
850401 Points -7%
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
829792 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=104, last 2 years)
810694 Points -11%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
773857 Points -15%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
17340 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
14998 Points +20%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13827 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (10140 - 17025, n=21)
13216 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13174 Points +5%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
12525 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
11397 Points -9%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1180 Points +19%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1169 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1129 Points +14%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1103 Points +11%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
993 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (749 - 1169, n=14)
993 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=165, last 2 years)
917 Points -8%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
886 Points -11%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8164 Points +11%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
7345 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
7186 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (6007 - 7665, n=15)
6951 Points -5%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6584 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=159, last 2 years)
6470 Points -12%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
6164 Points -16%
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
Points -100%
System
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13412 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
11373 Points 0%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
11336 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (9273 - 11338, n=15)
10312 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=159, last 2 years)
10306 Points -9%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9934 Points -12%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
9294 Points -18%
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
Points -100%
Memory
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8777 Points +31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=159, last 2 years)
7031 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6844 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (5125 - 8906, n=15)
6787 Points +1%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6697 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
5456 Points -19%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5437 Points -19%
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
Points -100%
Graphics
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
21678 Points +1%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
21477 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (15216 - 22308, n=15)
20338 Points -5%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
19247 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=159, last 2 years)
17891 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
17475 Points -19%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
16375 Points -24%
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
Points -100%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1960 Points +10%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1960 Points +10%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1785 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1739 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1291 - 1888, n=15)
1659 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=159, last 2 years)
1575 Points -12%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1527 Points -14%
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
Points -100%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
78964 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (61568 - 81722, n=8)
72917 Points -8%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
42662 Points -46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17814 Points -77%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
14572 Points -82%
AImark - Score v2.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1046 - 96317, n=14)
17097 Points +1535%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6323 Points +504%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6121 Points +485%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6034 Points +477%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
5976 Points +471%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1046 Points

GPU基准测试结果与CPU的测量结果相似。Xperia 5舒适地坐在中间位置，但不得不把头等位置让给其他设备。尽管如此，这款手机的性能不仅完全可以满足日常任务，还可以满足对图形要求高的应用程序。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
2776 Points +36%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2768 Points +35%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2568 Points +25%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2047 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1935 Points -5%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1807 Points -12%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
3005 Points +21%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2796 Points +12%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2637 Points +6%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2488 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2202 Points -11%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1847 Points -26%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
11779 Points +27%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10982 Points +18%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10282 Points +11%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9268 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7890 Points -15%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6721 Points -27%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10034 Points +21%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8313 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7710 Points -7%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6534 Points -21%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5857 Points +46%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4672 Points +17%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4009 Points
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3998 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3909 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20640 Points +16%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19283 Points +8%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
17859 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14680 Points -18%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10987 Points -38%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13223 Points +31%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10323 Points +2%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10103 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9105 Points -10%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8449 Points -16%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points -100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps +82%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +52%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +51%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -24%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
59.9 fps -24%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
456 fps +43%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
446.6 fps +40%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
368 fps +16%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
320 fps +1%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
318 fps
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
251 fps -21%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps +140%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +98%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
84 fps +40%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
59.9 fps 0%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
253 fps +39%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
237 fps +30%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
214 fps +18%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
204 fps +12%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
182 fps
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
139 fps -24%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +98%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
114 fps +90%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
59.9 fps 0%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -7%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
179 fps +53%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
172.4 fps +47%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
131 fps +12%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
130 fps +11%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
117 fps
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps -14%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps +82%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73 fps +49%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +22%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
59.9 fps +22%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -24%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
105.2 fps +59%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps +56%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
72 fps +9%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps +8%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps +3%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps +66%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
57.6 fps +40%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps +39%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps +32%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
41 fps
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps -32%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps +79%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps +48%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
38.2 fps +32%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps +7%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps +7%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
104 fps +82%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps +18%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +5%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +5%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps -33%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +61%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
111.1 fps +50%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps +36%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps +1%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -19%

索尼Xperia提供出色的浏览器性能。这款手机在基准测试和实际使用中都提供了极好的流畅体验。网站加载迅速，没有停顿。打开许多标签也不会影响性能。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)
189.85 Points +41%
Sony Xperia 5 IV (chrome 107)
134.6 Points
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points -8%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
117.894 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (72.8 - 134.6, n=16)
107.9 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Chrome 100.0.4896.127)
107.364 Points -20%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)
101.23 Points -25%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
98.153 Points -27%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)
341 runs/min +277%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min +59%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)
129.3 runs/min +43%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Chrome 100.0.4896.127)
105 runs/min +16%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
104 runs/min +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (64.4 - 129.3, n=16)
104 runs/min +15%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
99.2 runs/min +10%
Sony Xperia 5 IV (Chrome 107)
90.5 runs/min
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)
188 Points +65%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points +3%
Sony Xperia 5 IV (Chrome 107)
114 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
101 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (68 - 119, n=4)
93 Points -18%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
90 Points -21%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)
279 Points +60%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)
193 Points +11%
Sony Xperia 5 IV (Chrome 107)
174 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Chrome 100.0.4896.127)
153 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
150.2 Points -14%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
145 Points -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (79 - 193, n=15)
142.9 Points -18%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
98 Points -44%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)
65726 Points +43%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)
49343 Points +7%
Sony Xperia 5 IV (Chrome 107)
45945 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Chrome 100.0.4896.127)
44398 Points -3%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
44245 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (27730 - 50626, n=17)
42391 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=211, last 2 years)
38432 Points -16%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
37098 Points -19%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Chrome 100.0.4896.127)
1557.9 ms * -80%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * -76%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
1104 ms * -28%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
1011.5 ms * -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (814 - 1440, n=16)
1010 ms * -17%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
864 ms *
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)
823.5 ms * +5%
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)
496.4 ms * +43%

* ... smaller is better

当涉及到存储速度时，Xperia 5 IV不能再保持它在中游的位置。虽然这些数字本身并不坏，但在我们的比较中，所有其他设备都更快。这款手机 摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra处于一个自己的联盟中。

也就是说，Xperia为用户提供了用microSD卡增加存储容量的选项，从而获得了加分。

Sony Xperia 5 IVGoogle Pixel 7 ProSamsung Galaxy S22+OnePlus 10 ProMotorola Edge 30 UltraAverage 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-4%
19%
19%
50%
-1%
33%
Sequential Read 256KB
1474
1346.78
-9%
1629.99
11%
1602.12
9%
1717.77
17%
1602 ?(1030 - 3134, n=60)
9%
1889 ?(226 - 4512, n=198, last 2 years)
28%
Sequential Write 256KB
997
874.73
-12%
1001.67
0%
1253.34
26%
1363.58
37%
748 ?(233 - 1332, n=60)
-25%
1473 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=198, last 2 years)
48%
Random Read 4KB
207
219.01
6%
306.7
48%
284.34
37%
349.08
69%
243 ?(126.2 - 428, n=60)
17%
278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=198, last 2 years)
34%
Random Write 4KB
254
253.18
0%
297.67
17%
264.45
4%
446.25
76%
244 ?(121.4 - 503, n=60)
-4%
312 ?(9.4 - 753, n=198, last 2 years)
23%

游戏 - 能够运行现代游戏

由于内部强大的硬件，Xperia 5 IV拥有出色的游戏性能。即使是现代游戏，如PUBG Mobile，也能在最大图形设置下完美运行。正如使用Gamebench进行的测量所显示的，性能保持稳定，帧率没有任何下降。

然而，在 一加10 Pro(配备了相同的SoC和GPU）在相同的设置下，在PUBG Mobile中比我们的评测单元多出10帧。Xperia在游戏过程中也会明显变热。但Xperia的一个优势是它有位置良好的扬声器，可以直接向玩家投射声音。

051015202530354045505560Tooltip
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Armajet: Ø60 (56-61)
Sony Xperia 5 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Dead Trigger 2; 1.8.22: Ø59.9 (59-60)
Sony Xperia 5 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; League of Legends: Wild Rift; 3.5.0.6093: Ø59.8 (59-60)
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.7 (57-61)
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø59.6 (50-61)
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.2 (53-61)
Sony Xperia 5 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 2.3.0: Ø29.9 (28-31)
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.7 (35-41)

排放物 - Xperia 5会明显发热

温度

索尼Xperia 5 IV在高负荷运行时变热。该设备上最热的部分是摄像头周围的上部区域。我们测得的最高温度为39.6°C（103.3°F），在满负荷的情况下，整个手机表面的平均温度为37.7°C（99.9°F），这意味着该设备的运行温度高于这个级别的平均手机。当设备运行游戏或其他CPU密集型任务时，框架会明显变热。

在3DMark压力测试中，索尼Xperia 5 IV在对比组中处于中间位置。在稳定测试过程中，其性能大约下降了40%。然而，除了 iPhone 14和 像素7 Pro，其他竞争对手的表现都不太理想。索尼Xperia稍稍落后于一加10 Pro。 一加10 Pro尽管拥有相同的SoC。

Max. Load
 39.6 °C39.4 °C35.4 °C 
 39.6 °C38.6 °C35.2 °C 
 38 °C38.3 °C35 °C 
Maximum: 39.6 °C
Average: 37.7 °C
34.6 °C35.4 °C37.4 °C
33.6 °C35.9 °C36.9 °C
33.4 °C36.5 °C37 °C
Maximum: 37.4 °C
Average: 35.6 °C
Room Temperature 21.1 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
84.1 % +41%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69.3 % +16%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67.9 % +14%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.8 %
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.6 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58.2 % -3%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75.6 % +18%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
75.5 % +18%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73.1 % +14%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64.2 %
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63.1 % -2%
Samsung Galaxy S22+
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60.9 % -5%
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Sony Xperia 5 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø10.5 (9.52-14.8)
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø12.4 (11.3-15.5)
Sony Xperia 5 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø36.5 (30.2-50.6)
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø45.4 (41.6-60)

扬声器 - 令人敬畏的立体声扬声器和声场

Xperia 5 IV的立体声扬声器在各方面都非常出色。我们的测量结果显示，中音和高音都有明显的线性和平衡。扬声器也可以变得非常响亮。唯一的问题是，与大多数智能手机的扬声器一样，它们总体上缺乏低音和低频。

扬声器的位置很特别，因为它们是正面的。更重要的是，它们不仅通过了杜比全景声认证，而且还与360现实音频兼容。该功能允许两个扬声器产生惊人的三维声音，前提是音频内容已经为其正确编码。你可以使用手机附带的Tidal三个月的免费试用套餐来测试360现实音频。这款手机还有一个功能，可以让你通过同步振动来增强你的音频体验。

对于那些喜欢使用有线耳机的人，索尼提供了一个3.5毫米音频插孔，信噪比为85dBFS。Xperia 5 IV支持广泛的蓝牙编解码，包括SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、LDAC、aptx Adaptive和aptX TWS+。在我们的测试中，将各种无线耳机连接到设备上时，我们没有遇到任何问题。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.5392526.325.13123.729.34035.931503640.56324.929.18020.424.410018.53212516.937.216017.950.9200164825014.154.631512.256.840013.35850010.96763012.370.580012.171.5100012.575.7125011.874.4160011.975.5200012.475250012.876.6315013.177.140001376.2500013.276.4630013.675.1800013.675.41000013.774.2125001464.71600013.852.3SPL2587.1N0.670.6median 13.2median 71.5Delta1.69.541.536.235.538.231.731.730.835.132.242.825.131.319.422.320.923.617.626.515.839.9134711.752.610.660.510.563.811.968.213.871.815.475.612.775.91675.912.477.611.677.813.179.613.176.613.777.814.271.414.77315.376.215.974.216.564.917.161.926.188.10.774.6median 13.8median 731.99.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSony Xperia 5 IVOnePlus 10 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Sony Xperia 5 IV audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

OnePlus 10 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命--Xperia 5 IV让我们大惑不解

消耗功率

索尼在手机的耗电量方面做得很好。特别是在空闲功耗方面，Xperia 5 IV优于对比中的所有其他设备，除了 iPhone 14.其他一些制造商设法使他们的手机在负载下更有效地运行--但索尼手机在负载下的耗电量要比 一加10 Pro(它有相同的SoC)。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.12 / 0.25 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.7 / 1.04 / 1.15 Watt
Load midlight 4.25 / 7.84 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Sony Xperia 5 IV
5000 mAh		Apple iPhone 14
3279 mAh		Google Pixel 7 Pro
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S22+
4500 mAh		OnePlus 10 Pro
5000 mAh		Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
4610 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
1%
-12%
-23%
-30%
-14%
-61%
-38%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
0.6
14%
0.78
-11%
0.71
-1%
0.7
-0%
0.74
-6%
1.255 ?(0.7 - 3.18, n=15)
-79%
0.883 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=161, last 2 years)
-26%
Idle Average *
1.04
0.8
23%
1.61
-55%
1.1
-6%
1.1
-6%
1.84
-77%
2.02 ?(1.04 - 4.38, n=15)
-94%
1.467 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=161, last 2 years)
-41%
Idle Maximum *
1.15
1
13%
1.63
-42%
1.19
-3%
1.7
-48%
1.86
-62%
2.21 ?(1.15 - 4.45, n=15)
-92%
1.621 ?(0.83 - 4.46, n=161, last 2 years)
-41%
Load Average *
4.25
5.4
-27%
3.29
23%
7.74
-82%
6.4
-51%
2.75
35%
5.49 ?(3.58 - 8.04, n=15)
-29%
6.58 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=155, last 2 years)
-55%
Load Maximum *
7.84
9.2
-17%
6.01
23%
9.64
-23%
11.3
-44%
4.54
42%
8.75 ?(6.67 - 11.3, n=15)
-12%
9.91 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=155, last 2 years)
-26%

* ... smaller is better

Leistungsaufnahme: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Sony Xperia 5 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6 (0.966-11.1)
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.31 (1.89-11.3)
Sony Xperia 5 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.367 (0.94-1.57)
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.975 (0.806-1.805)

Leistungsaufnahme: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Sony Xperia 5 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.55 (7.78-10.7)
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.72 (5.35-8.45)
Sony Xperia 5 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.367 (0.94-1.57)
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.975 (0.806-1.805)

电池寿命

在为这次审查进行电池分析时，我们发现了一些令人费解的事情。可以说，Xperia 5 IV在负载下可以很好地管理资源。它持续的时间大大超过了 一加10 Pro在压力测试中的时间要长得多。然而，在所有其他测试中，OnePlus的电池寿命远远优于Xperia，尽管两款设备的电池容量相同。

Xperia的持续时间比竞争对手短得多，特别是在 "读者测试 "和Wi-Fi测试（模拟现实生活中的使用场景）。抛开我们的测试，这款手机在日常使用中提供了很好的电池寿命。Xperia 5 IV一次充电就能轻松度过漫长的一天。两天的轻度使用也不是不可能的事。

索尼并不是要为拥有最快的充电时间而赢得任何奖项。该公司没有在手机中加入充电器，而是在其网站上推荐自己的30W快速充电器。我们在测试中没有使用索尼的原装充电器，而是试用了其他各种充电设备。在最好的情况下，Xperia 5 IV使用谷歌的18W充电器，在1小时35分钟内成功从10%充到100%。

与它的前辈不同，Xperia 5 IV也可以使用Qi标准进行无线充电。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
15h 51min
WiFi Websurfing
10h 17min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 16min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 24min
Sony Xperia 5 IV
5000 mAh		Apple iPhone 14
3279 mAh		Google Pixel 7 Pro
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S22+
4500 mAh		OnePlus 10 Pro
5000 mAh		Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
4610 mAh
Battery Runtime
65%
6%
53%
20%
47%
Reader / Idle
951
2689
183%
1210
27%
2575
171%
1617
70%
2206
132%
H.264
1036
1266
22%
1213
17%
1021
-1%
1121
8%
1188
15%
WiFi v1.3
617
1010
64%
676
10%
788
28%
767
24%
872
41%
Load
324
289
-11%
226
-30%
364
12%
255
-21%
323
0%

Pros

+ 易于操作的外形尺寸
+ 伟大的扬声器
+ 良好的性能
+ 音频插孔
+ 微型SD卡读卡器

Cons

- 可变焦不再提供
- 厚边框
- 裸机盒内容

结论 - Xperia 5 IV是一款独特而出色的设备

已审查。索尼Xperia 5 IV。评测单位由索尼德国公司友好地提供。
已审查。索尼Xperia 5 IV。评测单位由索尼德国公司友好地提供。

索尼在Xperia 5 IV上走了自己的路，首先是21:9长宽比的超薄机身，既没有缺口也没有打孔。尽管屏幕周围的宽条设计看起来不太现代，但机箱提供的空间可以容纳一对出色的扬声器。那些拥有高品质耳机的人，会很高兴地发现一个3.5毫米的音频插孔。如果有必要，你还可以将你的音乐或其他媒体收藏放在microSD卡上，并将其插入手机中。

Xperia 5 IV的摄像头不会以高像素让你惊叹，但它们能提供良好的效果，至少在有足够光线的情况下。然而，相机产生的图像缺乏一点清晰度，而且索尼没有在手机上安装可变变焦，这也是一个遗憾。但至少Xperia 5 IV背面有三个完全成熟的摄像头。

性能方面 骁龙8代1毫无疑问是非常好的。Xperia 5 IV可以轻松处理当前的游戏和日常任务，在性能方面为未来几年做好了准备。然而，手机在高负荷时确实会发热。令人遗憾的是，索尼只承诺在相当短的时间内提供更新，尤其是考虑到该手机的性能。

总之，索尼Xperia 5 IV是一款独特的手机，在某些方面走自己的路。

这款手机肯定会赢得一些粉丝的青睐，但它并不便宜。如果你想要一个microSD插槽和一个音频插孔，其他手机将很难与Xperia 5 IV竞争。如果你更关注处理能力，那么 一加10 Pro可能值得一看，因为它用相同的SoC提供了稍好的性能。如果想获得更多性能、屏幕空间和百万像素，那么 摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra可能是一个不错的选择。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

索尼Xperia 5 IV只提供一种配置。这款手机目前的价格是：US$798/849欧元/849英镑在亚马逊上。你也可以在索尼的官方网上商店购买。

Sony Xperia 5 IV - 12/13/2022 v7 (old)
Benedikt Winkel

Chassis
89%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
68 / 70 → 97%
Weight
91%
Battery
89%
Display
92%
Games Performance
58 / 64 → 90%
Application Performance
89 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
90 / 90 → 100%
Camera
71%
Average
78%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 索尼Xperia 5 IV评测--有个性的智能手机
Benedikt Winkel, 2022-12-17 (Update: 2024-08-15)