联想Yoga 7 16代7评测。庞大的16英寸可转换笔记本电脑
联想Yoga 7 16IAP7是一款中高端的敞篷车,也是制造商的第一款16英寸Yoga敞篷车。它还值得注意的是,它是第一个拥有酷睿i7-1240P、酷睿i7-1260P和酷睿i7-12700H配置的16英寸敞篷车,可选择 英特尔A370M独立GPU。另外,触摸屏固定在2560 x 1600 IPS,没有其他选择。
我们审查的设备是其中一个较小的配置,配有酷睿i7-1260P,没有独立的英特尔图形,价格约为1400美元。替代品包括竞争的16英寸机型,如 戴尔 Inspiron 16 7620二合一, LG Gram 16 2合1,或华为MateBook D 16.市场上没有多少16英寸的转换机,因此Yoga 7 16IAP7是为数不多的产品之一。
更多联想评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.7 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 2 kg | 19.2 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
83.6 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.7 kg | 18.4 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
85.7 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 2.1 kg | 18.41 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
86.2 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 i5-11320H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 18.9 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | LG Gram 16 (2021) i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 16.8 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.1 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH R7 5800H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 2 kg | 17.5 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 平滑和圆形
从外观上看,这款机箱可以说是14英寸的16英寸版本。 瑜伽9 14IAP7.该设计可通过其圆润的边缘实现凸起的外观来区分,而不是大多数其他笔记本电脑上经常出现的平坦边缘。因此,整个装置感觉特别光滑,因为圆润的边缘和角落与笔记本电脑的其他部分的触摸过渡得更加无缝。
至于刚度,金属底座和盖子都很坚固,吱吱作响或扭曲的情况极少,给人以坚实的感觉。然而,对键盘中心施加压力会导致明显的屈服,比竞争性的戴尔Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1因此,仍有一些改进的余地。
即使对于16英寸的外形尺寸,该系统也很重。该Acer Swift X SFX16华为MateBook D 16,或LG Gram 16,例如,在提供相同的16英寸屏幕尺寸的情况下,每个都轻了几百克。在联想的辩护中,Yoga 7 16IAP7在尺寸和重量上至少可以与Inspiron 16 7620二合一相媲美。
连接性 - 支持Thunderbolt 4
端口选项与戴尔Inspiron 16 7620二合一产品或LG Gram 16完全相同。事实上,即使是端口的定位也与戴尔的型号几乎相同。MateBook D 16也集成了相同的端口,尽管没有Thunderbolt支持。
SD卡阅读器
使用集成的SD卡读卡器的传输速率平均在80MB/s左右。将1GB的图片从我们的UHS-II测试卡移动到桌面上需要大约12秒。值得注意的是,与大多数其他笔记本电脑不同,集成的SD读卡器不是弹簧式的。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH (AV PRO V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH (AV PRO V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
通信 - 支持Wi-Fi 6E
英特尔AX211是Wi-Fi 6E和蓝牙5.2连接的标准配置。当与我们的6GHz网络配对时,我们经历了稳定的传输速率。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 |
网络摄像头
200万像素的摄像头比其他大多数笔记本电脑更清晰,在那里100万像素仍然是标准。包括一个物理隐私快门,还有一个用于支持Windows Hello的红外传感器。
维护
卸下七颗T5 Torx螺丝后,底板很容易脱落。请注意,在我们的配置上,冷却解决方案比较小,因为它缺乏独立的英特尔Arc GPU。因此,配置了英特尔GPU的用户可以期待一个比我们的特定设备更重、更有可能更响的系统。
配件和保修
除了交流电适配器和文件外,零售盒中没有任何额外的东西。我们很希望看到包括一支主动式手写笔,特别是考虑到Yoga 7 16的高价格。
如果在美国购买,则适用标准的一年有限制造商保修。
输入设备 - 像IdeaPad一样
键盘
瑜伽机型的键盘与你在IdeaPad机型上发现的键盘相似。因此,如果你以前有使用IdeaPad或Yoga笔记本的经验,打字的感觉会很熟悉。这里的按键很轻,反馈也相对敏锐,但键程较浅,咔哒声也适中。惠普Envy上的按键 HP Envy或LG Gram系列的按键相比之下要深一些。
触摸板
点击板为13.5 x 8厘米,比戴尔Inspiron 16 7620二合一(约13.3 x 9厘米)或LG Gram 16二合一(13.2 x 8.3厘米)上的点击板略小一些。不过,它还是很宽敞,而且滑行非常顺畅,可以舒适地进行多点触摸输入和光标滚动。
集成的点击板按键在按下时有很好的反馈,但点击声很大,有些用户可能不喜欢。
显示 - 没有90 Hz或120 Hz选项
HWiNFO报告说,类似于16:10的LEN160WQXGA IPS面板在 IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6.然而,在现实中,这两个显示器之间有很大的不同。首先,我们的Yoga模型被限制在原生的60赫兹刷新率,而IdeaPad上是120赫兹。其次,我们的Yoga的响应时间要慢得多。除此之外,两款机型的颜色和对比度都很接近。发现IdeaPad上的显示屏优于我们的Yoga,仍然令人失望,即使Yoga系列应该是IdeaPad系列的升级版。
|
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 393.7 cd/m²
Contrast: 1036:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.97 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.62
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
69.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Lenovo LEN160WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 BOE NV160WUM-NH0, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 BOE NV16N45, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Chi Mei N161HCA-EA3, , 1920x1080, 16.1" | LG Gram 16 (2021) LG Philips LP160WQ1-SPA1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -0% | 0% | -2% | 23% | 5% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 67 | 66.2 -1% | 67 0% | 65.1 -3% | 95.8 43% | 71 6% |
sRGB Coverage | 95.7 | 96.4 1% | 95.9 0% | 95.65 0% | 99.8 4% | 99 3% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69.3 | 68.3 -1% | 69.3 0% | 66.75 -4% | 83.8 21% | 73.3 6% |
Response Times | 20% | 14% | 18% | -2% | 60% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36 ? | 30.5 ? 15% | 32 ? 11% | 30 ? 17% | 44 ? -22% | 16.4 ? 54% |
Response Time Black / White * | 24.8 ? | 18.7 ? 25% | 20.8 ? 16% | 20 ? 19% | 20 ? 19% | 8.8 ? 65% |
PWM Frequency | 24940 ? | |||||
Screen | -30% | -48% | 8% | -88% | -14% | |
Brightness middle | 393.7 | 319 -19% | 320.7 -19% | 276 -30% | 331 -16% | 395 0% |
Brightness | 367 | 317 -14% | 309 -16% | 264 -28% | 309 -16% | 375 2% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 90 7% | 90 7% | 85 1% | 88 5% | 90 7% |
Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.23 39% | 0.36 5% | 0.16 58% | 0.22 42% | 0.32 16% |
Contrast | 1036 | 1387 34% | 891 -14% | 1725 67% | 1505 45% | 1234 19% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.97 | 3.4 -73% | 4.18 -112% | 1.8 9% | 4.64 -136% | 2.6 -32% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.46 | 8.1 -48% | 8.48 -55% | 3.77 31% | 9.82 -80% | 5.4 1% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.62 | 0.8 -29% | 0.77 -24% | 0.63 -2% | 3.16 -410% | 1.1 -77% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 5.7 -171% | 6.3 -200% | 2.76 -31% | 6.9 -229% | 3.4 -62% |
Gamma | 2.1 105% | 2.1 105% | 2.21 100% | 2.37 93% | 2.34 94% | 2.12 104% |
CCT | 6461 101% | 7433 87% | 6258 104% | 6564 99% | 7904 82% | 6140 106% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 75.1 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -3% /
-17% | -11% /
-29% | 8% /
7% | -22% /
-52% | 17% /
1% |
* ... smaller is better
该面板提供>95%的sRGB覆盖率,与大多数其他中档16英寸的转换器或笔记本电脑类似。LG Gram 16是为数不多的提供更广泛的>95% P3的替代品之一。
这款显示器在开箱后已经被很好地校准,平均灰度和色彩DeltaE值分别只有2.1和1.97。我们能够通过自己的X-Rite校准进一步将平均灰度和色彩DeltaE值分别降低到0.5和0.62。即便如此,由于显示器在出厂时已经达到了sRGB的精度,所以并不真正需要进行最终用户校准。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.4 ms rise | |
↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
户外能见度比Inspiron 16 7620二合一或LG Gram 16略好,因为联想的显示屏更亮。然而,眩光仍然是不可避免的,额外的亮度在大多数情况下并不足以产生巨大的差异。你仍然希望在阴凉处工作,以最大限度地提高可读性。
性能 - 英特尔第12代产品
测试条件
在运行下面的任何基准测试之前,我们通过联想Vantage和Windows分别将我们的设备设置为极限性能模式和性能模式。建议用户熟悉预装的联想Vantage软件,因为关键设置和联想专用补丁只能在这里找到。
处理器
如果只看CineBench的结果,CPU性能是非常好的。我们的 酷睿i7-1260P在联想中的表现可以比我们数据库中配备相同处理器的普通笔记本电脑相应地高出20%到30%。然而,在现实中,联想系统无法长时间保持高Turbo Boost时钟速率,因此这一优势随着时间的推移而缩小,正如我们下面的CineBench R15 xT循环图所示。当与 MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo相比,例如,我们的联想系统在CineBench循环测试的开始阶段会快30%左右,最后会慢14%左右。换句话说,联想系统在短时的高负荷运行中表现出色,但在长时间的高负荷运行中,它开始落后。
较慢 "的 酷睿i5-1240P有时可以比我们的酷睿i7-1260P表现得更快,这取决于所涉及的型号。事实上,选择 酷睿i7-12700H配置,而不是酷睿i7-1260P,只会带来非常轻微的处理器性能提升,这是根据我们对华为MateBook D 16.
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (2176 - 10898, n=26) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (11015 - 56906, n=26) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (669 - 2709, n=26) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (42571 - 82493, n=26) | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (2901 - 6975, n=26) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (5950 - 26376, n=26) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (16041 - 92356, n=26) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (259 - 771, n=26) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (1237 - 5858, n=26) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (13261 - 43652, n=26) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH |
系统性能
PCMark 10的结果非常好,接近我们在搭载酷睿H处理器的华为MateBook D 16或搭载Ryzen H处理器的记录。联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16.分数明显高于戴尔Inspiron 16 7620,尽管它们都采用了相同的酷睿i7-1260P CPU,可能是因为戴尔型号配备了较慢的M.2 SSD。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4796 - 6068, n=17) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9260 - 11251, n=17) | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6167 - 8629, n=17) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5231 - 6908, n=17) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1484 - 1811, n=16) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1486 - 1755, n=16) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1451 - 1872, n=16) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1253 - 1807, n=16) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 |
PCMark 10 Score | 5830 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (25125 - 71544, n=25) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (24983 - 72065, n=25) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (23512 - 66799, n=25) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (77.9 - 118.4, n=21) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示,在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时,存在轻微的DPC问题。在60FPS的情况下,4K视频的播放效果非常好,没有掉帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 只有一个内部驱动器
我们的设备配备了一个512GB的 美光MTFDKCD512TFKPCIe3 x4 NVMe固态硬盘,连续读取和写入速率分别高达3200 MB/s和3100 MB/s,这与大多数高端PCIe3驱动器所能提供的类似。然而,与三星PM981a相比,4k q32 t16的读写速率要比预期的慢得多。
我们单位的硬盘在循环运行DiskSpd时,不会表现出性能节流的问题。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH | |
Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能
原始图形性能比我们数据库中配备相同集成的笔记本电脑的平均速度略快。 Iris Xe 96 EUs.上升的部分原因可能是由于更快的LPDDR5-4800内存,而大多数笔记本电脑仍然使用DDR4-3200。尽管11代Tiger Lake 和12代Alder Lake之间的CPU差异很大,但同比的好处只是微不足道,因为核心图形架构没有改变。
升级到 英特尔A370M配置将使用户的GPU性能比我们的Iris Xe 96 EUs快60%到150%,这是根据我们使用华硕ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD.
3DMark 11 Performance | 7279 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 20454 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4601 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1799 points | |
Help |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 117.1 | 91 | 19.6 | 9.25 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 78.3 | 51.4 | 29.1 | 13.7 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 118.4 | 86.6 | 62.3 | 52.4 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 40.4 | 22.6 | 16 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 42.6 | 30.1 | 29.1 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 95.5 | 44.5 | 35.4 | 28.7 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 18.8 | 15.7 | 12 | 9.7 |
排放
系统噪音
风扇的噪音和行为取决于联想Vantage的三种电源配置文件设置。节约电池、智能冷却和极限性能。如果是浏览或流媒体,建议使用 "节省电池",否则,当引入较重的负载时,内部风扇会很快启动。运行 Witcher 3 在智能冷却模式和极限性能模式下,风扇噪音水平分别为37.7 dB(A)和40 dB(A),这比我们在戴尔Inspiron 16 7620二合一上观察到的水平略大。在大多数日常工作中,该系统还算安静,远低于30分贝(A)。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.6 / 23.6 / 23.6 dB(A) |
Load |
| 37.7 / 40.2 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.6 dB(A) |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD | Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe | Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-11320H, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU | LG Gram 16 (2021) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -7% | 5% | -11% | 0% | -10% | |
off / environment * | 23.6 | 24.2 -3% | 23.2 2% | 25.4 -8% | 26 -10% | 24.04 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.6 | 24.2 -3% | 23.5 -0% | 25.4 -8% | 26 -10% | 24.04 -2% |
Idle Average * | 23.6 | 25.8 -9% | 23.5 -0% | 25.4 -8% | 26 -10% | 24.04 -2% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.6 | 30.5 -29% | 23.5 -0% | 27.8 -18% | 26 -10% | 24.04 -2% |
Load Average * | 37.7 | 39.8 -6% | 29.4 22% | 41 -9% | 30.8 18% | 41.3 -10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 40 | 39.8 -0% | 35.6 11% | 49.21 -23% | ||
Load Maximum * | 40.2 | 39.8 1% | 39.7 1% | 47 -17% | 31.1 23% | 52.93 -32% |
* ... smaller is better
温度 - 非常酷
即使在运行高要求的负载时,表面温度也不是那么热。顶部和底部的热点可以分别达到39摄氏度和35摄氏度,而华为MateBook D 16 2022的温度为41摄氏度至48摄氏度。 华为MateBook D 16 2022或LG Gram 16的45摄氏度至47摄氏度。这些热点朝向机箱的后部,使掌托的温度较低。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 19.3 °C / 67 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23.4 °C / 74.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+4.7 °C / 8.5 F).
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 Intel Core i5-11320H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -30% | -39% | -41% | -22% | -36% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 39 | 41.8 -7% | 42.2 -8% | 52.4 -34% | 46.9 -20% | 51.9 -33% |
Maximum Bottom * | 34.2 | 47.3 -38% | 47.4 -39% | 50 -46% | 45.1 -32% | 51.5 -51% |
Idle Upper Side * | 21.2 | 28.3 -33% | 32.2 -52% | 30.3 -43% | 26.4 -25% | 27.2 -28% |
Idle Bottom * | 21.6 | 30.2 -40% | 33.6 -56% | 30.4 -41% | 24.1 -12% | 28.5 -32% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当在Prime95下受压时,时钟频率和CPU板封装功耗将分别飙升至3.2 GHz和64 W,仅持续几秒钟,直到核心温度达到91 C。此后,CPU将下降到2.2 GHz和38 W,最后稳定在大约1.6 GHz、23 W和66 C。在微星Summit E14 Flip Evip上运行同样的测试 MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo在微星Summit E14 Flip Evo上运行相同的测试,显示出稍高的稳定时钟频率和CPU功耗,分别为1.9 GHz和28 W,尽管核心温度更高,为82 C。
当运行在极限性能模式时,GPU的时钟频率和温度将分别稳定在998 MHz和67 C。 Witcher 3在极限性能模式下运行时,GPU时钟速率和温度将分别稳定在998 MHz和67 C。如下表所示,在智能冷却模式下重复同样的测试,将导致CPU和GPU时钟速率略低,核心温度更低。在戴尔Inspiron 16 7620二合一电脑上进行同样的测试,将导致更高的GPU时钟速率和温度,分别为1296 MHz和82 C。联想的核心温度相对较低,这可能是上述表面温度较低的原因。
用电池供电运行并不限制性能。在电池上进行的3DMark 11测试将返回与主电源上基本相同的物理和图形分数。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(°C) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 42 |
Prime95压力 | 1.6 | -- | 66 |
Prime95 + FurMark压力 | 1.4 | 100 | 67 |
Witcher 3 压力(智能冷却模式) | 0.95 | 898 | 64 |
Witcher 3 压力极端性能模式) | 1.1 | 998 | 67 |
发言人
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
功率消耗--一个要求很高的16英寸系统
联想要求的功率比Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1略高,可能是由于我们的联想有更高的原始分辨率(1600p对1200p),以及集成的Iris Xe GPU的图形性能略快。游戏时的功耗相对较高,约为60瓦,与更强大的Acer Swift X或两倍于 LG Gram 16由旧的第11代酷睿i7-1165G7驱动。
我们能够从小型(5.6 x 5.6 x 2.9厘米)65瓦的USB-C交流适配器测量到67瓦的最大消耗。由于系统的涡轮增压潜力有限,这个比率只是暂时的,然后再下降25W之多,如下图。
Off / Standby | 0.21 / 0.48 Watt |
Idle | 6.6 / 8.3 / 9.8 Watt |
Load |
66 / 67.1 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 i5-11320H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU, , 1920x1080, 16.1" | LG Gram 16 (2021) i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH R7 5800H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV, IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -9% | 9% | -23% | 20% | -35% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6.6 | 6.1 8% | 5.3 20% | 7 -6% | 3.8 42% | 5.7 14% |
Idle Average * | 8.3 | 10.6 -28% | 8.3 -0% | 10.1 -22% | 9 -8% | 9.3 -12% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.8 | 11.5 -17% | 9.6 2% | 15 -53% | 11.3 -15% | 11 -12% |
Load Average * | 66 | 65.5 1% | 54.3 18% | 63.3 4% | 35.2 47% | 83.4 -26% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 52 | 61.2 -18% | 43.9 16% | 63.3 -22% | 94.4 -82% | |
Load Maximum * | 67.1 | 68.4 -2% | 70 -4% | 94 -40% | 43.5 35% | 128.7 -92% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
我们能够从内部71Wh的电池中记录到不到8小时的实际WLAN使用,而Inspiron 16 7620或LG Gram 16可以持续几个小时。值得注意的是,带有独立英特尔Arc选项的Yoga 7 16 SKU有一个大得多的99Wh电池。然而,8小时对于大多数用户来说应该是可以应付的。
从空电到满电大约需要90分钟。
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 71 Wh | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 87 Wh | Acer Swift X SFX16-51G-5388 i5-11320H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 58.7 Wh | LG Gram 16 (2021) i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 80 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH R7 5800H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 75 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -11% | 65% | -9% | 120% | 24% | |
Reader / Idle | 734 | 1020 39% | 1713 133% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 475 | 424 -11% | 876 84% | 484 2% | 943 99% | 754 59% |
Load | 113 | 193 71% | 90 -20% | 258 128% | 101 -11% | |
H.264 | 506 | 1204 | 623 | |||
Gaming | 68 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 如果你不介意重量的话,高质量的敞篷车
目前可供选择的三款16英寸转换机是联想Yoga 7 16代7。 戴尔 Inspiron 16 7620二合一,以及LG Gram 16 2合1.联想的独特之处在于,它提供了独立的英特尔A370M图形,而戴尔则提供了独立的GeForce MX550图形。如果你的工作负载可以从额外的图形马力中受益,那么联想和戴尔基本上是并驾齐驱的。较小的差异,如内存(戴尔是焊接的,而联想是可升级的)或触摸屏(戴尔是400尼特的1600p,而联想是300尼特的1200p或400尼特的2400p),都是用户的偏好。太糟糕了,这两个型号都没有90赫兹或120赫兹的显示选项,而这些选项在响应速度和用户界面的流畅性方面会产生很大的不同。
联想Yoga 7 16代7很强大,有很多功能,包括可选的英特尔Arc图形。然而,其沉重的2公斤重量使得平板电脑模式在大多数情况下比更轻的LG Gram 16二合一产品更累赘。
如果你能接受集成的Iris Xe图形,那么联想的大部分吸引力就会消失,因为LG Gram 16 2合1的重量要轻28%,同时提供相同分辨率的触摸屏和相同的2个雷电4端口。它甚至有更深的色彩,更长的电池寿命,支持两个内部固态硬盘,以及免费提供的主动手写笔。联想的产品当然更强大,但LG机型在重量上的节省和其他方面的优势,使它值得你在考虑联想的时候仔细看看。
价格和可用性
联想Yoga 7 16IAP7现在在 Best Buy发货。搭配Core i7-1260P CPU,起价1430美元。另外,用户可以直接从联想购买https://lenovo.vzew.net/c/2597802/218864/3808?subId1=news&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lenovo.com%2Fus%2Fen%2Fp%2Flaptops%2Fyoga%2Fyoga-2-in-1-series%2Fyoga-7i-gen-7-(16-inch-intel)%2Flen101y0013%3Forg那里有更多的SKU,包括1400美元的英特尔Arc A370M GPU。
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7
- 08/03/2022 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo