英特尔A370M首次亮相。华硕ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD二合一评测
最新的华硕Zenbook Flip 15 Q539接替了老款的Zenbook Flip 15 Q538,后者搭载了11代英特尔酷睿U系列CPU和GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GPU。较新的Zenbook机型采用了非常相似的机身,只是外部变化不大,但我们关注的是其内部更新。华硕为2022年的机型配备了12代酷睿i7-12700H CPU和独立的英特尔Arc A370M GPU,而其他大多数可转换笔记本电脑只配备了酷睿U系列CPU和集成图形。与老一代机型相比,至少在处理器性能方面,其性能提升应该是极致的。
华硕也恰好是第一批广泛使用英特尔A370M的机型之一。30W的GPU旨在成为GeForce MX系列的替代品,也是现在流行的集成Iris Xe系列的快速解决方案。
Zenbook Flip 15 Q539的替代品包括其他15.6英寸或16英寸的转换机,如 HP Envy x360 15, HP Spectre x360 15, LG Gram 16 2合1, 三星Galaxy Book Pro 360 15, 或联想瑜伽C740-15.我们的测试装置可以在网上找到,零售价为1400美元。
更多华硕评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD i7-12700H, A370M | 1.8 kg | 18.9 mm | 15.60" | 2880x1620 | |
85.8 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2021 | LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 17 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
85.7 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 2.1 kg | 18.41 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
86.6 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.4 kg | 11 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
86.4 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr R7 5700U, Vega 8 | 1.9 kg | 18.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
86.5 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2020 | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T i7-10510U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | 1.9 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
84.8 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2020 | Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.9 kg | 17.25 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - 全身蓝色
华硕在包括Zenbook Flip 15 Q539在内的大多数Zenbook机型中使用了非常相似的铝合金机身材料。因此,如果你曾经拿过较新的Zenbook Pro 14,那么光滑的亚光蓝色外观会让你立刻感到熟悉。 禅意本Pro 14或 禅书Pro 15.Zenbook Flip 15 Q539/538的一个独特的表面特征是铬合金切割的边缘和角落,这在其他Zenbook型号上是不存在的。
底盘的刚性从上到下都很好。特别是盖子,与三星Galaxy Book Pro 15或LG Gram 16 2-in-1相比,不容易翘起来,其刚性水平类似于 XPS 15或HP Spectre x360系列。与上述戴尔或惠普的系统相比,压下键盘中心仍然会使表面略微翘起,但这并不重要。
在尺寸和重量方面,ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD与上一代产品几乎完全相同。ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD尽管有所有的外部和内部差异。较新的机型能够提供明显更快的性能,而不需要比上一代产品更大或更重。寻找更轻、更便于旅行的用户可以考虑LG Gram 16二合一或Galaxy Book Pro 360 15,但这些替代品配备了较慢的酷睿U系列CPU,而且没有专用显卡。
连接性--良好的选择,尴尬的定位
与老款ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD相比,端口选项发生了很大变化。尤其是集成的HDMI端口和双Thunderbolt 4端口,对于连接大量的配件和外部显示器来说是非常好的。然而,端口的定位是有问题的,因为两个Thunderbolt端口和3.5音频插孔都非常紧密地挤在一起,沿着外部鼠标通常会在的右边缘。电源按钮也在附近,所以很容易不小心让笔记本进入睡眠状态。
SD卡阅读器
有趣的是,在测试我们的UHS-II MicroSD卡时,AS SSD和真实世界的结果之间存在巨大的差异。虽然该基准声称连续读取率超过253MB/s,但文件从我们的测试卡到桌面的传输速度只有67MB/s。将1GB的图片从卡上移到桌面上只需15秒,而XPS 15只需一半时间。
老款的Zenbook Flip 15 Q538系列会集成一个全尺寸的SD读卡器,而不是MicroSD读卡器。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) |
沟通
英特尔AX211是Wi-Fi 6E和蓝牙5.2连接的标准配置。虽然在我们的6GHz网络上接收率很好,但即使经过多次重测,发射率也不像我们希望的那样稳定。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD |
网络摄像头
集成的网络摄像头只有720p,而像Razer Blade 15这样的替代机型则配备了更高分辨率的1080p网络摄像头。支持Windows Hello,并且可以通过F10键禁用网络摄像头以保护隐私。
维护
底部面板需要用T5 Torx扳手和飞利浦螺丝刀来拆卸。令人讨厌的是,该模型在橡胶脚下隐藏了两颗螺丝,也必须拆除。
业主可以直接接触到单个M.2 2280插槽和内部电池,而WLAN和RAM模块则被焊接起来。
配件和保修
除了文件和交流电适配器外,盒子里没有任何额外的东西。如果在美国购买,则有一年的有限保修。
输入设备 - 舒适的点击板
键盘
按键反馈与上一代相比没有太大变化ZenBook 15 UX534FTC或Zenbook Flip 15 UX563FD。ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD的按键感觉比上一代产品的按键更坚硬。 联想IdeaPad 5 15而比惠普Spectre x360 15、惠普EliteBook或LG Gram 16二合一的按键稍软。如果你以前在消费类笔记本电脑上工作过,打字体验并没有什么特别之处。
三级键盘背光灯是标准配置。除了白色以外,还有七种颜色可供选择,如下图所示,与其他大多数可转换笔记本电脑不同。我们发现蓝色和茶色比纯白色更容易入眼。
触摸板
点击板(13 x 7.5厘米)比起那些在中国市场上的点击板略小。 LG Gram 16 2-in-1(13.2 x 8.3 cm)或惠普Envy x360 15(12.5 x 8 cm)的键盘略小。然而,考虑到16:9的宽屏比例,更宽的长度还是很有帮助的。滑动很顺畅,只有在较慢的速度下才有一点粘性,以获得更准确的点击。由于显示器的快速120赫兹刷新率,它的反应也非常快。
在点击板上按压时的反馈通常过于松软或轻,但这台Zenbook上的反馈实际上是相当坚定和令人满意的。较为坚硬的点击的缺点是按压时发出比平常更响的咔哒声。
显示器 - 首个120赫兹3K OLED触摸屏
华硕宣传的峰值亮度为550尼特,但我们在零售设备上只能达到340尼特,即使关闭了自动亮度控制并切换了HDR功能。也没有与亮度控制有关的BIOS设置。我们已经就这一差异联系了华硕,并将在必要时更新本页面。550尼特在这个模型上将是非常突出的,因为大多数其他可转换的产品通常在300和350尼特之间比较。我们至少可以通过自己的独立测量确认DCI-P3的全面覆盖和潘通验证的颜色。
240赫兹的脉宽调制存在于所有亮度级别,包括最大设置。我们怀疑,如果我们能够达到550尼特的 "真正 "最大亮度,PWM将消失。MyAsus软件包括减少PWM强度的功能,但它们涉及进一步调低面板的亮度。
除了上述的亮度问题外,显示质量非常好。与4K相比,16:9的3K分辨率(2880x1620)在可读性方面更适合15.6英寸的外形尺寸。独特的分辨率和快速的120赫兹原生刷新率有助于将这款Zenbook与竞争机型区分开来。
奇怪的是,ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD出厂时的默认刷新率设置为60 Hz。用户必须通过Windows或MyAsus手动将刷新率改为120赫兹,以体验面板的高刷新率。
|
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 340.1 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.47 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD Samsung ATNA56AC01-0, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6" | LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P LG Philips LP160WQ1-SPA1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 BOE NV16N45, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE SDC4159, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr AUOA08B, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T BOE HF NE156QUM-N64, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML B156HAN02.5, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -6% | -22% | 0% | -20% | -22% | -54% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.8 | 96.3 -4% | 67 -33% | 99.9 0% | 69 -31% | 66.2 -34% | 39.04 -61% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.9 0% | 95.9 -4% | 100 0% | 99.1 -1% | 97.2 -3% | 57.9 -42% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 97.5 | 84.7 -13% | 69.3 -29% | 97.6 0% | 70.1 -28% | 68.3 -30% | 40.33 -59% |
Response Times | -3393% | -2846% | -102% | -5530% | -5241% | -4548% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.8 ? | 36.4 ? -4450% | 32 ? -3900% | 2 ? -150% | 60.4 ? -7450% | 60 ? -7400% | 50.8 ? -6250% |
Response Time Black / White * | 1.1 ? | 26.8 ? -2336% | 20.8 ? -1791% | 2 ? -82% | 40.8 ? -3609% | 35 ? -3082% | 32.4 ? -2845% |
PWM Frequency | 240.4 ? | 60 -75% | |||||
Screen | -88% | -64% | 11% | 5% | 9% | -134% | |
Brightness middle | 340.1 | 325.3 -4% | 320.7 -6% | 290 -15% | 337.2 -1% | 351 3% | 286 -16% |
Brightness | 344 | 311 -10% | 309 -10% | 290 -16% | 337 -2% | 335 -3% | 268 -22% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 92 -5% | 90 -7% | 99 2% | 87 -10% | 87 -10% | 83 -14% |
Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.05 | 0.24 | 0.31 | 0.2 | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.47 | 4.91 -99% | 4.18 -69% | 1.84 26% | 1.73 30% | 1.74 30% | 7.3 -196% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.96 | 10.96 -84% | 8.48 -42% | 3.83 36% | 3.69 38% | 2.76 54% | 21.7 -264% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 7.7 -328% | 6.3 -250% | 1.24 31% | 2.3 -28% | 2.22 -23% | 7 -289% |
Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.12 104% | 2.21 100% | 2.2 100% | 2.19 100% | 2.35 94% | 2.35 94% |
CCT | 6346 102% | 8272 79% | 6258 104% | 6686 97% | 6872 95% | 6667 97% | 5847 111% |
Contrast | 929 | 891 | 5800 | 1405 | 1132 | 1430 | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.83 | 0.77 | 2.69 | 1.61 | 5.1 | ||
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 75.8 | 64.1 | 62 | 36.9 | |||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.8 | 99.6 | 97 | 57.5 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1162% /
-667% | -977% /
-558% | -30% /
-20% | -1848% /
-1008% | -1751% /
-954% | -1579% /
-914% |
* ... smaller is better
正如制造商所宣传的那样,显示器在开箱后得到了良好的校准。平均灰度和色彩deltaE值分别为1.8和2.47,因此任何额外的校准充其量只能有最小的改进。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.5 ms rise | |
↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4 ms rise | |
↘ 0.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240.4 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
在阴凉处,室外能见度最好是一般,因为光面显示屏的反射是不可避免的。如果能达到宣传的550 nit亮度,可视性会好很多。相比之下,大多数15.5英寸的消费型折叠机的最高亮度在300至350 nit之间。
性能 - 第12代英特尔酷睿H系列
测试条件
在运行以下任何基准测试之前,我们通过Windows和MyAsus软件将我们的设备设置为性能模式,以获得尽可能高的分数。强烈建议用户熟悉MyAsus,因为与屏幕刷新率、风扇配置文件、显示颜色,甚至OLED护理有关的重要设置都可以在这里进行切换。
处理器
CPU性能是所有可转换笔记本电脑中最快的之一,因为几乎所有的笔记本电脑都运行在较慢的Core U系列处理器上。用户基本上是在一个可转换的外形因素中获得了游戏笔记本电脑的原始处理能力。从旧的第十代酷睿i7-10510U或第11代 酷睿i7-1165G7升级后,多线程性能将提高3倍至4倍,而我们的第12代 酷睿i7-12700H.
循环运行CineBench R15 xT显示出良好的性能可持续性,即使华硕的处理器比我们数据库中的Core i7-12700H平均慢5%到10%。相比之下,可转换笔记本的Turbo Boost潜力一般比较有限,比如LG Gram 16二合一笔记本或更老的华硕ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD.
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1576 - 7407, n=63) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15p G2 ITH 21B1000YGE | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (300 - 704, n=63) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15p G2 ITH 21B1000YGE | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1379 - 2916, n=69) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15p G2 ITH 21B1000YGE | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 | |
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 | |
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (113 - 263, n=64) | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15p G2 ITH 21B1000YGE | |
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15p G2 ITH 21B1000YGE | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (168 - 732, n=62) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (22844 - 73067, n=62) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15p G2 ITH 21B1000YGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15p G2 ITH 21B1000YGE | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2743 - 5972, n=62) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15p G2 ITH 21B1000YGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15p G2 ITH 21B1000YGE | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (5144 - 13745, n=63) | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15p G2 ITH 21B1000YGE | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (803 - 1851, n=63) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15p G2 ITH 21B1000YGE | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (4.67 - 21.8, n=63) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15p G2 ITH 21B1000YGE | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (34.2 - 95.3, n=62) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15p G2 ITH 21B1000YGE | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15p G2 ITH 21B1000YGE | |
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (0.4441 - 1.052, n=62) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML -1! |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2585 - 17957, n=62) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12439 - 90760, n=62) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (833 - 4242, n=62) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (57923 - 103202, n=62) | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (3249 - 9939, n=62) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (7135 - 44760, n=62) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (31839 - 144360, n=62) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (305 - 1171, n=62) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1437 - 9692, n=62) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12863 - 52207, n=62) | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 |
系统性能
PCMark的结果是所有敞篷车中最高的一些,特别是在数字内容创作分测试中,GPU性能的权重更高。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A370M () | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A370M () | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A370M () | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A370M () | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A370M () | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A370M () | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A370M () | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A370M () | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 |
PCMark 10 Score | 6293 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (25615 - 80511, n=62) | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (25586 - 79442, n=62) | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (23679 - 88660, n=62) | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (76.2 - 133.9, n=60) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示,在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时,存在轻微的DPC问题。在60FPS下的4K视频播放很流畅,CPU和GPU利用率很低,没有丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 只有一个驱动器
我们的测试单元配备了一个高性能的 SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013NPCIe3 M.2固态硬盘,连续读取和写入率分别超过3000MB/s。在循环运行DiskSpd时,该硬盘在长时间维持最大传输速率方面没有问题。然而,没有任何PCIe4选项有点令人失望,因为Zenbook应该是华硕首要的专业消费系列。
竞争者LG Gram 16 2合1提供两个M.2 2280存储插槽,而我们的华硕只有一个。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能--可与最新的GeForce MX550媲美
根据3DMark的数据, 弧形A370M的运行速度比MX450快70%至100%。 GeForce MX450或性能类似于 移动GTX 1060在DX12应用中的表现。然而,在实际游戏中,英特尔GPU有时会比GeForce MX450更快或更慢,这取决于标题。在我们的测试中,A370M在《最终幻想15》和《赛博朋克2077》中的表现很容易超过MX450。 Witcher 3和《赛博朋克2077》,而在《GTA V》、《DOTA 2重生》或《 X-Plane》中则相反。因此,如果作为Arc和Nvidia或Arc和AMD之间的比较工具,3DMark是一个糟糕的游戏性能指标。即便如此,性能仍然比集成的 Iris Xe 96EUs的全面性。
我们建议Arc A370M在大多数游戏中以稳定的40 FPS为目标,而不是30或60 FPS,因为该显示器的原始刷新率为120 Hz。
由于Arc 370M仍然是新产品,运行在早期的驱动程序上,我们预计随着硬件和驱动程序的成熟,性能会逐渐提高。随着时间的推移,我们将对更多的游戏进行基准测试并添加到列表中。
3DMark 11 Performance | 12902 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 28128 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7699 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4308 points | |
Help |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 157.2 | 148.3 | 40.7 | 16.2 | 10.7 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 166.7 | 98.9 | 55.9 | 25.8 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 104.4 | 92.2 | 72.8 | 68.3 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 70.3 | 38.4 | 26.7 | 19.8 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 43.5 | 34.2 | 29.9 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 175.9 | 73.9 | 62 | 52.5 | 37.2 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 92.1 | 44.1 | 31.3 | 25.5 | 19.8 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 76.4 | 47.5 | 29.5 | 22 | 14.5 |
Gears Tactics (2020) | 189 | 76.8 | 48.8 | 38.4 | 27.7 |
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | 57 | 40 | 35 | 31 | 23 |
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) | 77 | 45 | 34 | 15 | 11 |
Dirt 5 (2020) | 80.4 | 40.7 | 32 | 23.1 | 15.2 |
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) | 62 | 33 | 20 | 18 | 13 |
Hitman 3 (2021) | 85.7 | 54.9 | 50 | 46.2 | 23.4 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 192 | 89 | 61 | 25 | |
Far Cry 6 (2021) | 86 | 44 | 36 | 24 | |
Guardians of the Galaxy (2021) | 23 | 14 | 12 | ||
God of War (2022) | 35.2 | 31.2 | 25.4 | 17.3 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 46.1 | 37.1 | 25.4 | 21 |
排放
系统噪音 - 受压时很响
风扇噪音取决于通过MyAsus软件进行的三种风扇配置文件模式。性能、标准和耳语。如果只是简单的网络浏览或视频流,建议避免使用性能模式,否则风扇噪音将在31 dB(A)左右徘徊,而安静的背景为23 dB(A)。如果在标准或耳语模式下,两个内部风扇都会更加慵懒。
在标准模式下运行Witcher 3 ,将导致风扇的噪音在35至40分贝(A)之间。如果在性能模式下,风扇会跳到45 dB(A),这比大多数其他可转换的型号要响得多。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23 / 23 / 24.7 dB(A) |
Load |
| 31.7 / 45.2 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD A370M, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N | LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ256HAJD | HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr Vega 8, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 1% | 6% | -4% | 6% | -13% | -13% | |
off / environment * | 23 | 25.1 -9% | 23.2 -1% | 25 -9% | 25 -9% | 30.3 -32% | 29.3 -27% |
Idle Minimum * | 23 | 25.2 -10% | 23.5 -2% | 25 -9% | 25.1 -9% | 30.3 -32% | 29.3 -27% |
Idle Average * | 23 | 25.2 -10% | 23.5 -2% | 25 -9% | 25.1 -9% | 30.3 -32% | 29.3 -27% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.7 | 25.2 -2% | 23.5 5% | 25 -1% | 25.1 -2% | 30.3 -23% | 29.6 -20% |
Load Average * | 31.7 | 32.1 -1% | 29.4 7% | 32.7 -3% | 26.3 17% | 33.7 -6% | 32.4 -2% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 45.2 | 34.9 23% | 35.6 21% | 30.8 32% | 37.4 17% | ||
Load Maximum * | 45.2 | 37.8 16% | 39.7 12% | 42 7% | 35.5 21% | 38.9 14% | 33.3 26% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
与上一代ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD相比,键盘上的表面温度较低,尽管我们的新机型采用了Core H系列CPU。当运行 Witcher 3例如,顶部和底部的热点可以分别达到33摄氏度和38摄氏度,而UX563FD则为42摄氏度至46摄氏度。我们的ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD能够提供更快的性能,而不一定感到更热。
键盘的掌托和两侧仍然比键盘中心更冷,使手掌舒适。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.6 °C / 81.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+0.5 °C / 0.9 F).
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A370M | LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML Intel Core i7-10510U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -6% | -18% | -2% | -2% | -3% | 5% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 36.4 | 42.2 -16% | 42.2 -16% | 42.6 -17% | 39.6 -9% | 42.6 -17% | 40.1 -10% |
Maximum Bottom * | 40.4 | 46.2 -14% | 47.4 -17% | 40.8 -1% | 44.4 -10% | 41.5 -3% | 42.3 -5% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.2 | 26 1% | 32.2 -23% | 25.9 1% | 23.6 10% | 26.4 -1% | 23 12% |
Idle Bottom * | 29.2 | 27.6 5% | 33.6 -15% | 26.1 11% | 28.2 3% | 26.3 10% | 23 21% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当运行Prime95对CPU施加压力时,时钟频率将提升到3.5GHz,直到大约25秒后核心温度达到92C。此后,时钟频率将下降到2.9 GHz,最后降到2.5 GHz,以保持86 C的核心温度。在测试开始时,CPU的功耗可高达80 W,然后稳定在55 W。 LG Gram 16 2合1相比之下,将稳定在只有22瓦。
在性能模式下运行时,CPU和GPU的温度将分别稳定在76℃和72℃。 Witcher 3在性能模式下,CPU和GPU的温度将分别稳定在76℃和72℃。有趣的是,在平衡模式下重复这项测试将导致更高的核心温度84 C和81 C,而游戏性能或GPU板的功耗31 W没有变化。因此,性能模式对于降低温度是最有用的,其代价是更高的风扇噪音,而不是最大化原始性能。
在电池上运行限制了CPU性能,而GPU性能保持不变。在电池上进行的Fire Strike 测试将返回物理和图形分数,分别为22206和8323分,而在主电源上则为26723和8013分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 31 | 30 |
Prime95压力 | 2.5 - 2.7 | -- | 87 | 70 |
Prime95 + FurMark压力 | 1.8 | 2050 | 82 | 76 |
Witcher 3 应力(平衡模式) | ~0.7 | 2050 | 84 | 81 |
Witcher 3 压力(性能模式) | ~0.7 | 2050 | 76 | 72 |
发言人
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
功耗 - 由于英特尔的原因,功耗很高
ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD可能很快,但它的代价是相对于其他15.6英寸的转换机来说,功耗更高。运行3DMark 06来代表平均负载,将消耗略高于100W,比较慢的 Galaxy 书籍Pro 360 15,惠普Envy x360 15,或最后一代华硕ZenBook Flip 15 UX563。尽管如此,用户获得的多线程性能大约是第11代Tiger Lake-U的3倍,是Iris Xe 96 EU的1.5倍至2倍,因此从每瓦性能的角度来看,功耗的上升可能是值得的。
当CPU和GPU都处于100%的利用率时,我们能够从中小型(约13.8 x 6.8 x 2.4厘米)的150瓦交流适配器中记录到155瓦的最大消耗。在运行如此苛刻的负载时,电池的充电速度会变慢。
Off / Standby | 0.13 / 0.8 Watt |
Idle | 9.1 / 11.9 / 12.4 Watt |
Load |
101.3 / 155.7 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD i7-12700H, A370M, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6" | LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG), IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ256HAJD, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr R7 5700U, Vega 8, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T i7-10510U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 44% | 41% | 52% | 55% | 28% | 49% | |
Idle Minimum * | 9.1 | 4.4 52% | 5.3 42% | 4 56% | 3.5 62% | 2.3 75% | 2.97 67% |
Idle Average * | 11.9 | 9 24% | 8.3 30% | 5.6 53% | 5.7 52% | 10.3 13% | 7.2 39% |
Idle Maximum * | 12.4 | 10.1 19% | 9.6 23% | 10.1 19% | 5.8 53% | 11 11% | 9.9 20% |
Load Average * | 101.3 | 45.5 55% | 54.3 46% | 34.7 66% | 46 55% | 77 24% | 40.8 60% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 85.6 | 39.6 54% | 43.9 49% | 34.7 59% | 42.1 51% | 68 21% | |
Load Maximum * | 155.7 | 67 57% | 70 55% | 63 60% | 65.4 58% | 118 24% | 64.7 58% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
华硕为该机型配备了一个比其他大多数可转换设备更大的电池组,达到96Wh,以弥补对CPU和GPU的要求。业主可以期待近9.5小时的实际浏览使用时间,与惠普Envy x360 15或老款ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD相当。像LG Gram 16二合一或戴尔Inspiron 16 7620二合一的机型仍可持续几个小时以上。
从空电到满电的充电速度非常快,只有60多分钟,因为大多数笔记本电脑通常需要1.5到2小时左右。支持通过第三方USB-C适配器进行充电。
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD i7-12700H, A370M, 96 Wh | LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 80 Wh | Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 87 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 67 Wh | HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr R7 5700U, Vega 8, 51 Wh | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T i7-10510U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 71 Wh | Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, 60.3 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 63% | 34% | 36% | 34% | 13% | -8% | |
Reader / Idle | 789 | 1774 125% | 1020 29% | 1654 110% | 1430 81% | 1169 48% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 562 | 941 67% | 876 56% | 679 21% | 591 5% | 566 1% | 622 11% |
Load | 164 | 158 -4% | 193 18% | 127 -23% | 192 17% | 149 -9% | 120 -27% |
H.264 | 669 | 715 |
Pros
Cons
结论--CPU和显示器抢尽风头
ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD是为那些希望获得比传统15.6英寸敞篷车更多动力的性能猎手准备的。这里的酷睿i7-12700H中央处理器实际上是一个游戏级的处理器,被塞进一个二合一的机箱。如果你的工作负载可以从高性能中受益,那么这款华硕可以成为一个有吸引力的选择。
像往常一样,更高的性能是以重量和功耗为代价的。如果你不需要耗电的酷睿H系列CPU,那么,更轻的 LG Gram 16 2合1或 三星Galaxy Book Pro 360 15应该被考虑代替。
快速的第12代酷睿H系列CPU和漂亮的120赫兹3K OLED触摸屏,比新的Arc A370M GPU更令人印象深刻。如果你不介意重量的话,它的性能对于这个尺寸来说是很高的。
触摸屏是Q539ZD的另一个主要卖点。更具体地说,它是市场上首批15.6英寸3K OLED面板之一,具有原生120赫兹刷新率,可实现深色和超平滑的用户界面。这种视觉体验目前在任何其他15.6英寸的敞篷车上都是不可用的。
希望华硕能够就我们遇到的亮度问题回复我们的电话,因为ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD在其他方面是一款非常值得推荐的机器。我们的最终得分将被扣留,直到我们能够确认显示屏的亮度。
价格和可用性
截至目前,ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD还没有在亚马逊上销售。百思买有库存,起价1400美元,如我们的评论中所配置的。