Notebookcheck Logo

惠普ZBook Power 15 G9笔记本电脑评测--带哑光4K显示屏的移动工作站

Alder Lake和RTX A2000。

通过ZBook Power 15,惠普在入门级领域提供了一个移动工作站。除了目前的Alder Lake CPU外,还使用了Nvidia的专业GPU,但只有芯片达到RTX A2000。
Alder Lake GPU Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Windows Workstation

惠普公司提供各种移动工作站模型系列,首先是薄的 ZBook Firefly入门级设备,其次是ZBook Studio,以及 ZBook Fury高端机型,以及ZBook Power,它应该是价格和性能的良好结合。虽然外壳不是特别纤薄,但这也带来了足够数量的端口。我们测试了ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA版本,价格约为2800欧元(约2981美元),它配备了非常好的 酷睿i7-12700H,以及RTX A2000,32GB内存,1TB固态硬盘,以及哑光4K显示屏。与ZBook Power 15 G8的前辈相比(在我们的测试中),外壳和输入设备没有变化,所以我们在这里将保持这些部分的简短,而将重点放在性能部分。

HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA
Processor
Intel Core i7-12700H 14 x 1.7 - 4.7 GHz, 90 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1335 MHz, RAM: 1368 MHz, 45 W TDP ( including 5 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 527.27, Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR5-4800, dual-channel, 2 slots, max. 64 GB
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, LGD073F, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB 
, 891 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 22.8 x 359.4 x 233.9
Battery
83 Wh, 6880 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 120W PSU, HP Security Tools, 36 Months Warranty
Weight
2.009 kg, Power Supply: 434 g
Price
2800 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
87.4 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2023
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA
i7-12700H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
2 kg22.8 mm15.60"3840x2160
from EUR 2800
90.1 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2022
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA
i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
1.8 kg19 mm16.00"3840x2400
from EUR 3300
88.3 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
Dell Precision 5000 5560
i7-11850H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
2 kg18 mm15.60"3840x2400
from EUR 3000
86.2 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2022
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE
i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg22.7 mm15.60"1920x1080
Alternative specs USD 1,729.99
87.7 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA
i7-11800H, T600 Laptop GPU
2 kg22.8 mm15.60"1920x1080
from EUR 1700

案件和设备

铝制外壳与之前的G8型号相比没有变化。 之前的G8型号.虽然整体质量不错,但稳定性还没有达到更昂贵的工作站型号,如ZBook Studio或ZBook Fury。此外,显示器在改变开启角度后会轻微晃动。从外观上看,ZBook Power 15 G9的深灰色看起来不大,也不引人注目。机箱底部只用螺丝固定,可以很容易地取出来。除了工作存储器,你还可以访问两个M.2固态硬盘插槽,但WLAN模块是焊接的。

在连接设备方面,仍然有许多USB-A端口,以及带有Thunderbolt 4的USB-C,以太网和一个HDMI端口。然而,它缺少一个读卡器。WLAN模块进行了升级,英特尔的AX211卡现在也支持Wi-Fi 6E标准。我们能够从我们的华硕参考路由器连接到6-GHz的网络,没有任何问题。我们测量的传输速率非常高,也很稳定。ZBook Power没有提供LTE/5G模块。

作为网络摄像头,仍然有一个720p的传感器,包括一个用于面部识别的红外摄像头。网络摄像头完成了它的工作,但即使在良好的光线条件下,图像质量也不是很好。

尺寸比较

366.5 mm 250 mm 22.7 mm 2.3 kg359.4 mm 233.9 mm 22.8 mm 2 kg359.4 mm 234 mm 22.8 mm 2 kg356 mm 242 mm 19 mm 1.8 kg344.72 mm 230.14 mm 18 mm 2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
左边:Kensington Nano安全插槽,以太网,USB-A 3.2 Gen.1(5 Gbps,供电),HDMI 2.0b,智能卡阅读器
左边:Kensington Nano安全插槽,以太网,USB-A 3.2 Gen.1(5 Gbps,供电),HDMI 2.0b,智能卡阅读器
右边:3.5毫米音频,2个USB-A 3.2 Gen.1(5Gbps),USB-C 4.0与Thunderbolt 4(40Gbps,DisplayPort 1.4,HP睡眠和充电)。
右边:3.5毫米音频,2个USB-A 3.2 Gen.1(5Gbps),USB-C 4.0与Thunderbolt 4(40Gbps,DisplayPort 1.4,HP睡眠和充电)。
Networking
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1644 (min: 1614) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1616 (min: 1552) MBit/s ∼100%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1646 (min: 1567) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1622 (min: 1552) MBit/s ∼100%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AX12
981 (min: 864) MBit/s ∼66%
iperf3 receive AX12
1382 (min: 1340) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AX12
1421 (min: 1336) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AX12
1385 (min: 1285) MBit/s ∼100%
HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AX12
1481 (min: 1432) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12
1333 (min: 633) MBit/s ∼96%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1616 (1552-1651)
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1644 (1614-1668)
ColorChecker
12.2 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
2 ∆E
2 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
ColorChecker HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA: 6.41 ∆E min: 1.6 - max: 12.75 ∆E

输入设备 - 带有良好键盘的ZBook Power

与之相比 ZBook Power 15 G8,在输入设备方面也没有变化。带背景照明的键盘提供了非常好的打字体验,右侧有一个专门的数字块。在布局方面,你必须习惯稍小的方向键和顶部按键行中的电源按钮。指纹扫描仪被放置在右侧,在键盘下方。在我们的测试中,ClickPad工作可靠,但点击的声音有点大。

输入设备
输入设备
键盘照明
键盘照明

显示器 - 4K IPS,100% sRGB覆盖率

子像素阵列
子像素阵列
可见的光晕
可见的光晕

我们已经用普通的全高清面板测试了 前身而我们目前测试的ZBook Power G9配置的是可选的低功耗4K IPS显示屏。与前代产品一样,这款产品仍然采用16:9格式(3840 x 2160像素)。主观上,LG-Philips面板产生了良好的图像质量,但明亮的内容在哑光显示表面上显得略有颗粒感。此外,响应时间不是特别快,在实践中我们还看到一些明显的重影效果,例如在鼠标指针上。

惠普宣传的亮度为400cd/m²,而我们的测试设备也达到了这个最高范围。同时,黑值非常低,为0.15,导致了一个非常好的对比度,超过2500:1。在全亮度和黑暗背景下,有一些明显的光晕。没有使用PWM。

405
cd/m²
400
cd/m²
408
cd/m²
397
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
386
cd/m²
380
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
360
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LGD073F tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 408 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 387.7 cd/m² Minimum: 18 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 391 cd/m²
Contrast: 2613:1 (Black: 0.15 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.2
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
69.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.13
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA
LGD073F, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA
BOE0A52, IPS, 3840x2400, 16"
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Sharp LQ156R1, IPS, 3840x2400, 15.6"
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE
N156HCA-EAC, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"
HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA
AUOA08B, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display
22%
28%
-35%
2%
Display P3 Coverage
69.1
97.5
41%
94.9
37%
43.7
-37%
70.5
2%
sRGB Coverage
97.7
99.9
2%
100
2%
65.1
-33%
99
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
69.6
86.3
24%
100
44%
45.3
-35%
71.3
2%
Response Times
73%
-5%
-2%
-33%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
45.8 ?(21.2, 24.6)
15.3 ?(6.9, 8.4)
67%
47.2 ?(25.2, 22)
-3%
48 ?(26, 22)
-5%
61
-33%
Response Time Black / White *
28.6 ?(14.5, 14.1)
6.1 ?(2.1, 4)
79%
30.4 ?(16.4, 14)
-6%
28 ?(17, 11)
2%
38 ?(19, 19)
-33%
PWM Frequency
Screen
6%
-21%
-87%
3%
Brightness middle
392
554
41%
501.5
28%
305
-22%
393
0%
Brightness
388
516
33%
467
20%
281
-28%
385
-1%
Brightness Distribution
88
84
-5%
83
-6%
88
0%
78
-11%
Black Level *
0.15
0.47
-213%
0.44
-193%
0.32
-113%
0.25
-67%
Contrast
2613
1179
-55%
1140
-56%
953
-64%
1572
-40%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.2
1
69%
4.73
-48%
5.9
-84%
1.5
53%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7
2.4
66%
8.45
-21%
20.1
-187%
4.3
39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.2
0.6
50%
0.51
57%
4.5
-275%
1.4
-17%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.9
1.6
67%
3.6
27%
5.3
-8%
1.3
73%
Gamma
2.13 103%
2.29 96%
2.08 106%
2.1 105%
2.26 97%
CCT
5982 109%
6458 101%
6447 101%
6307 103%
6435 101%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
34% / 19%
1% / -8%
-41% / -64%
-9% / -2%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN 灰度标定
CalMAN 灰度标定
CalMAN 饱和度已校准
CalMAN 饱和度已校准
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准

我们用专业的CalMAN软件测量面板。在交付状态下,有一个明显可见的红色色调,而且色温也过暖。这是不幸的,因为我们能够通过自己的校准(可从上面的链接免费下载颜色配置文件)显著改善显示效果,特别是在灰度方面导致出色的结果,并完全摆脱了颜色色调。与参考的sRGB色彩空间(已完全覆盖)相比,色彩偏差也略低,只剩下100%的蓝色作为异常值。然而,经过校准的面板仍然适合用于图像处理。

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. DCI-P3
vs. DCI-P3
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.5 ms rise
↘ 14.1 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
45.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.2 ms rise
↘ 24.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8698 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在阳光下
在阳光下

在户外,显示屏得益于磨砂表面,只要避免光源的直接反射,即使在明亮的日子里,你仍然可以轻松地识别显示内容。IPS面板的可视角度稳定性非常好。

视角稳定
视角稳定

性能 - 配备英特尔Alder Lake的ZBook

 
 
 

测试条件

惠普并没有提供任何额外的电源配置选项。在测试中,我们能够观察到一些强烈变化的性能值。虽然通过一些BIOS的更新,情况略有改善,但仍不完全稳定。在105/75瓦的情况下,TDP值基本上被配置得很高,但是处理器最多只能在一秒钟内使用到90瓦,然后迅速平移到55瓦左右。有时,处理器甚至一开始就有这个数值(在以前的BIOS版本中,它甚至低于40瓦)。

处理器

芯片酷睿i7-12700H来自英特尔目前的Alder Lake一代,结合了6个快速性能核心和8个效率核心。单核性能非常好,比上一代的酷睿i7-11800H快约15-20%。然而,在多核基准测试中,考虑到大机箱,性能略微令人失望,很多潜力仍未被利用。 例如,在ZBook Studio 16 G9在多核测试中,采用相同处理器的ZBook Studio 16 G9要快20%左右。我们还尝试手动提高TDP值,但冷却系统无法处理超过60-65瓦的功率,因为此时CPU温度将上升到95℃(203°F)以上。

在电池运行时,CPU的功耗被限制在30瓦。这对单核性能没有影响,但在多核测试中导致了约30%的性能下降(9926分CB R23 Multi)。你可以在我们的技术部分找到更多的CPU基准测试 我们的技术部分.

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

0135270405540675810945108012151350148516201755189020252160229524302565Tooltip
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2011 (1958-2048.45)
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø2518 (2462.45-2642.53)
Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H: Ø1525 (1468.05-1546.97)
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1464 (1395.62-1706.19)
HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA Intel Core i7-11800H; BIOS v1.01: Ø1871 (1826.07-2075.23)
HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA Intel Core i7-11800H; BIOS v1.09: Ø1598 (1546.61-1716.52)
CB R15多循环CPU值
CB R15多循环CPU值
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Workstation
 
83.6 pt
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA
Intel Core i7-12800H
82.9 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
76.1 pt
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA
Intel Core i7-12700H
73.8 pt
HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA
Intel Core i7-11800H
62.1 pt
Dell Precision 5000 5560 -2!
Intel Core i7-11850H
55.3 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE -1!
Intel Core i7-11800H
51.2 pt

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2048.45 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
326 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
252 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5475 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
687 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1768 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
13946 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average of class Workstation
 
98.8 pt
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA
Intel Core i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
88.6 pt
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
78.7 pt
HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA
Intel Core i7-11800H, T600 Laptop GPU
78 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
74.8 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE
Intel Core i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU
68.4 pt
Dell Precision 5000 5560 -9!
Intel Core i7-11850H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
0 pt

系统性能

ZBook Power 15 G9是一个反应非常快的设备,我们在测试中没有遇到任何问题。合成基准测试结果也非常好,证实了我们对其性能的主观印象。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Workstation
  (5953 - 8587, n=27, last 2 years)
7296 Points +17%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6676 Points +7%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
6321 Points +1%
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6232 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  ()
6232 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE
T1200 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G
5889 Points -6%
HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA
T600 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4960 Points -20%
PCMark 10 Score
6232 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Workstation
  (30324 - 95718, n=27, last 2 years)
63877 MB/s +1%
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA
Intel Core i7-12700H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
63043 MB/s
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA
Intel Core i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
61978 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (25615 - 80511, n=62)
53891 MB/s -15%
HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA
Intel Core i7-11800H, T600 Laptop GPU
26846 MB/s -57%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE
Intel Core i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU
24508 MB/s -61%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试中(上网冲浪、4K YouTube视频再现、CPU负载),有一些轻微的限制。因此,采用当前BIOS版本的设备并不适合使用实时音频应用程序。

LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE
T1200 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G
6955.6 μs * -519%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1136.6 μs * -1%
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1123.2 μs *
Dell Precision 5000 5560
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
759 μs * +32%
HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA
T600 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
537.6 μs * +52%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

2个PCIe 4.0 x4 SSD插槽
2个PCIe 4.0 x4 SSD插槽

ZBook Power 15 G9为M.2固态硬盘提供两个快速PCIe 4.0插槽。我们的测试装置使用了三星的大型1TB PM9A1(980 Pro的OEM版本)。第一次打开后,用户可以使用890GB的这个。固态硬盘的传输率非常好,即使在较长时间的负载后,性能也几乎完全保持稳定。你可以找到更多的SSD基准测试 这里.

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6958.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4842.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 438.24 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 400.34 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 76.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 156.27 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 409.28 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1041.79 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
 
89.7 pt
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
77.1 pt
HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
76.5 pt
Average of class Workstation
 
75.9 pt
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
75.3 pt
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
72.8 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE
Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G
44.4 pt

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

03306609901320165019802310264029703300363039604290462049505280561059406270Tooltip
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA: Ø6342 (5906.35-6531.31)

图形卡

GPU-Z Nvidia RTX A2000
GPU-Z Nvidia RTX A2000

Nvidia RTX A2000是惠普为ZBook Power 15 G9提供的最快GPU。这是更新的版本,有8GB的GDDR6-VRAM。然而,该GPU最多只能消耗45瓦(包括5瓦的动态提升),这使得它成为最慢的版本之一。在我们的基准测试中,该GPU因此也低于我们迄今为止为RTX A2000测量的平均结果。游戏性能可与 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti消费级GPU但由于经过认证的驱动程序,在专业应用程序中的性能也可以显著提高。

在持续的负载下,GPU的性能保持完全稳定。如同在处理器中一样,显卡在电池运行时的功耗也被限制在30瓦,导致性能降低近25%(3589分Time Spy Graphics)。你可以在这里找到额外的GPU基准测试移动显示芯片——基准测试成绩列表

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Workstation
  (9356 - 59715, n=28, last 2 years)
29485 Points +81%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
18058 Points +11%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (14831 - 19823, n=9)
17690 Points +9%
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
16297 Points
Dell Precision 5000 5560
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11850H
16236 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE
NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
12142 Points -25%
HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA
NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
10498 Points -36%
3DMark 11 Performance
16503 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
11074 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
5106 points
Help
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
53 Seconds * -0%
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
53 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (42 - 54, n=7)
49.4 Seconds * +7%
Average of class Workstation
  (13 - 95, n=23, last 2 years)
32.8 Seconds * +38%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Workstation
 
94.6 pt
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
81.8 pt
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
72 pt
Dell Precision 5000 5560 -1!
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
71.1 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
54.1 pt
HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
53.2 pt

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

051015202530354045Tooltip
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA i7-12700H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU: Ø44.5 (42-48)
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 182.9 177.1 134.7 65.4 47.3 45
The Witcher 3 (2015) 264 171 45 44.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 179.3 133.5 126.1 118.6 68.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 121.9 68.2 48.6 34.9 20.6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 122.6 103.6 87.6 73.1
Strange Brigade (2018) 266 126 100 86 36
F1 2021 (2021) 287 153.1 124.4 62.7 44.4 23.9
F1 22 (2022) 147.1 137.9 100.6 30.8 19.1 9.05

排放和电源管理

噪声水平

用两个风扇进行冷却
用两个风扇进行冷却

通常情况下,ZBook Power 15 G9的两个风扇在执行简单任务时经常保持不启动状态。只有当你把处理器或专用显卡放在负载下时,风扇才会迅速打开,通常产生的噪音水平在42至45 dB(A)之间,风扇的速度并不总是保持稳定,而是有时波动。在对两个组件进行最大负荷的压力测试中,我们测得的最大噪音为47.9 dB(A)。因此,目前的G9代仍然比前代产品略微安静。没有其他电子噪音。

Noise Level

Idle
23.8 / 23.8 / 23.8 dB(A)
Load
42.9 / 47.9 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23.8 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203534.234.336.634.22531.933.131.334.636.43127.726.226.324.232.94038.930.731.230365027.724.726.92623.6633328.625.623.226.28035.92723.418.739.110027.624.624.419.12812528.326.725.417.52816025.624.122.515.426.720029.229.526.720.230.125030.630.528.617.932.131532.731.630.517.234.440035.233.731.712.336.55003633.932.212.737.86303432.230.414.235.880033.231.93111.534.5100032.631.329.611.534.4125035.834.233.210.337.216003634.833.39.637.9200034.533.231.91036.4250035.633.832.41037.8315035.634.232.310.537.9400032.731.429.511.135500031.73129.211.133.7630032.23026.711.933.9800027.925.622.611.731.51000025.623.421.111.729.21250020.919.11712.224.11600016.315.714.311.119.4SPL45.944.542.923.847.9N5.54.94.20.56.4median 32.6median 31.3median 29.5median 11.7median 34.4Delta4.44.44.52.44hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
Dell Precision 5000 5560
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE
T1200 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G
HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA
T600 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
Noise
-4%
10%
2%
-8%
off / environment *
23.8
24
-1%
23.4
2%
25.21
-6%
25.54
-7%
Idle Minimum *
23.8
24
-1%
23.6
1%
25.21
-6%
25.54
-7%
Idle Average *
23.8
27.7
-16%
23.6
1%
25.21
-6%
25.54
-7%
Idle Maximum *
23.8
27.7
-16%
23.6
1%
25.21
-6%
25.54
-7%
Load Average *
42.9
39.8
7%
25.8
40%
39.09
9%
48.85
-14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
44.5
44.3
-0%
40.1
10%
36.6
18%
46.58
-5%
Load Maximum *
47.9
47.7
-0%
41.4
14%
43.53
9%
50.98
-6%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在日常操作中,移动工作站的表面温度通常保持很低,即使在负载下也完全没有理由担心。在48 °C (118 °F)时,唯一的热点是在向后的中央区域的底部,但由于其位置,你仍然可以将设备放在你的腿上。然而,基本单元的顶部,包括键盘,仍然明显较冷,最高温度为40℃(104℉)。

在压力测试期间,处理器在经历了90瓦的短暂峰值后,达到了35-39瓦的水平,而显卡则稳定在40瓦。在压力测试之后,性能并没有降低。在电池运行中,这些数值略有下降,CPU仍被允许消耗25瓦,而GPU在综合负载下则为30瓦。

压力测试期间的CPU和GPU值
压力测试期间的CPU和GPU值
Max. Load
 39.1 °C40.3 °C39 °C 
 38 °C39.3 °C36.1 °C 
 25 °C28.6 °C28.3 °C 
Maximum: 40.3 °C
Average: 34.9 °C
42.1 °C48.3 °C40 °C
39.7 °C45.4 °C38.6 °C
28.3 °C30.8 °C29 °C
Maximum: 48.3 °C
Average: 38 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.1 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.3 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.1 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.6 °C / 83.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-0.8 °C / -1.5 F).
压力测试期间的表面温度(顶部)
压力测试期间的表面温度(顶部)
压力测试期间的表面温度(底)。
压力测试期间的表面温度(底)。
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
Dell Precision 5000 5560
Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
Heat
-14%
-26%
-18%
2%
Maximum Upper Side *
40.3
38.7
4%
48.2
-20%
53.8
-33%
41.4
-3%
Maximum Bottom *
48.3
53.4
-11%
42.6
12%
52.1
-8%
41.5
14%
Idle Upper Side *
23.7
27.3
-15%
34.8
-47%
27.6
-16%
23.8
-0%
Idle Bottom *
23.8
31.6
-33%
35.2
-48%
27.7
-16%
25
-5%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

两个立体声扬声器是该移动工作站的弱点之一,因为它们的声音非常单薄,难以令人信服。虽然它们在视频会议或语音通话中发挥了作用,但我们绝对建议使用耳机或外部扬声器来再现音乐或电影。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.635.62534.636.73124.228.6403030.8502625.36323.222.68018.721.310019.122.412517.522.616015.424.120020.236.525017.942.231517.249.340012.355.350012.755.563014.257.980011.560.4100011.562125010.366.116009.667.220001064.725001066.6315010.564.8400011.169.4500011.168.5630011.967.5800011.7651000011.763.41250012.261.31600011.153.5SPL23.877.9N0.539.4median 11.7median 61.3Delta2.411.133.337.233.327.925.827.922.721.922.723.419.223.42820.92831.220.631.234.721.734.739.918.239.942.315.242.347.914.447.950.814.450.855.914.155.959.815.959.862.514.262.563.713.363.762.211.362.264.110.564.165.810.665.866.210.566.267.910.567.96510.86561.310.861.362.71162.755.811.455.858.911.558.957.511.657.55412.25455.31255.356.41356.449.710.849.775.223.675.235.50.535.5median 58.9median 11.6median 58.96.21.46.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EADell Precision 5000 5560
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Dell Precision 5000 5560 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

消耗功率

尽管有4K显示屏,ZBook Power 15 G9是一个非常高效的设备,空闲运行时最大功率为8.5瓦。在负载情况下,你可以期待大约85-100瓦,在经历了139瓦的短暂消费高峰后,在压力测试中,几分钟后也会平息在这个范围内。因此,附带的150瓦电源是完全足够的。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.16 / 0.81 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.9 / 7.2 / 8.5 Watt
Load midlight 87.2 / 139 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø86.8 (82.9-103.7)
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø115.3 (98.7-139.1)

Power Consumption With External Monitor

051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø77 (74.6-90)
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø40.5 (37.2-68.3)
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø79.8 (76-93.5)
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø66.3 (64.4-68.5)
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø83.6 (79.4-91.6)

电池寿命

充电过程
充电过程

83瓦时的大电池保持不变,允许良好的电池寿命,即使是采用全高清面板的前代产品仍然持续时间更长。考虑到4K面板,在我们的WLAN测试中,在150cd/m²(相当于我们测试设备最大亮度的65%)下,大约有10个小时,在最大亮度下仍然有9个小时,结果非常好。 低功耗显示在这里变得绝对引人注目。

当设备开机时,我需要大约2.5小时才能完全充电,34分钟后已经有50%的电量,70分钟后有80%。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 108)
9h 59min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 108)
9h 02min
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA
i7-11800H, T600 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh
739 min +23%
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA
i7-12700H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh
599 min
Average of class Workstation
  (148 - 897, n=27, last 2 years)
505 min -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE
i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU, 68 Wh
452 min -25%
Dell Precision 5000 5560
i7-11850H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh
380 min -37%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA
i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh
377 min -37%
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA
i7-12700H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh
542 min
Average of class Workstation
  (273 - 724, n=12, last 2 years)
436 min -20%
HP ZBook Studio 16 G9 62U04EA
i7-12800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh
272 min -50%

Pros

+ 坚固的金属外壳
+ 良好的系统性能
+ 2个SSD和2个SO-DIMM
+ Wi-Fi 6E和Thunderbolt 4
+ 电池寿命长
+ 良好的输入设备
+ 高效和哑光的4K显示屏

Cons

- 与前代产品相比,性能仅有小幅提升
- 扬声器不好
- 焊接的WLAN模块;没有WWAN选项
- 没有SD卡读卡器
- 在交货状态下,显示屏有红色色调

结论 - HP ZBook Power 15 G9将受益于更强大的冷却功能

测试HP ZBook Power 15 G9。测试装置由德国惠普公司提供。
测试HP ZBook Power 15 G9。测试装置由德国惠普公司提供。

ZBook Power 15 G9是一款入门级工作站,针对需要可靠性能和专业显卡的用户。除了处理器之外,我们的测试配置已经相当于最大配置的4K显示屏、Nvidia RTX A2000和丰富的存储空间,当然这也推高了价格。与它的前辈ZBook Power G9在许多方面也提供了坚实的性能。但特别是在CPU性能方面,结果又不总是稳定的。随着一些BIOS的更新,情况稍微稳定下来,但是工作站仍然无法充分利用 酷睿i7-12700H.

特别是在性能发展方面,ZBook Power 15 G9无法达到最高值,但由于一些BIOS的更新,CPU的性能在很大程度上已经稳定下来。 经过校准,低功耗的4K显示器提供了良好的图像质量,并使电池寿命更长。

然而,为了公平起见,我们还必须提到,竞争对手的入门级工作站,如 联想ThinkPad P15v戴尔Precision 5560也没有提供更多的性能,这三款机型的整体表现与眼下持平。4K面板基本上是一个非常好的选择,因为它的运行效率非常高,不会推高功耗,但如果可能的话,你应该对其进行校准。

价格和可用性

ZBook Power 15 G9目前可直接从惠普购买,起价约为1455美元,一些配置也可从亚马逊等购买。

HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA - 01/05/2023 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
86 / 98 → 87%
Keyboard
89%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
67 / 80 → 83%
Weight
63 / 10-66 → 94%
Battery
88 / 95 → 93%
Display
88%
Games Performance
88%
Application Performance
95%
Workstation
90%
Temperature
90 / 95 → 94%
Noise
81 / 90 → 90%
Audio
60%
Camera
29 / 85 → 34%
Average
79%
87%
Workstation - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 惠普ZBook Power 15 G9笔记本电脑评测--带哑光4K显示屏的移动工作站
Andreas Osthoff, 2023-01- 8 (Update: 2023-01- 8)