Notebookcheck Logo

华硕Zenfone 10评测:功能强大的紧凑型5G智能手机

iPhone14迷你版的替代产品?

手掌大小的智能手机越来越少,因此Zenfone 10恰到好处:它承诺以相对适中的价格在小巧的机身中提供强大的功能。在我们的评测中,您将了解买家是否需要做出妥协。
5G Android ARM Zen Smartphone
华硕Zenfone 10

Apple 去年,最新款的iPhone不再采用手掌大小的机身后,那些希望拥有一款功能强大但体积不大的智能手机的用户的选择范围再次缩小。几年来,华硕逆势而上,继续以整洁、紧凑的方式生产Zenfones。

2023年版的Zenfone 10再次专注于成为一款外形小巧、尽可能少妥协的高品质智能手机。让我们来看看这一点是否成功,同时考虑到强大的竞争对手,如 三星Galaxy S23.

Asus Zenfone 10 (Zenfone Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 8 x 2 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X3 / A715 / A710 / A510 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Memory
16 GB 
Display
5.90 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 446 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass Victus, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 464 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B42), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n12/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n41/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.4 x 146.5 x 68
Battery
4300 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 30W charging (USB-PD 3.0, Qualcomm Quick Charge 4.0), 15W wireless charging (Qi)
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.9, phase comparison-AF (All-pixel AF), laser-AF, OIS, LED-flash, Videos @4320p/​24fps (Camera 1); 13.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), charger, USB cable, bumper, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, IP68-certified, fanless, waterproof
Weight
172 g
Price
929 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
88.7 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
Asus Zenfone 10
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740
172 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash5.90"2400x1080
88.6 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2022
Asus Zenfone 9
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
169 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash5.90"2400x1080
82.9 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2022
Sony Xperia 10 IV
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
161 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.00"2520x1080
89.8 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15, A15 GPU 4-Core
140 g128 GB NVMe5.40"2340x1080
90.5 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy S23
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740
167 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2340x1080
Zenfone 10 的颜色选择
Zenfone 10 的颜色选择

好在华硕在Zenfone的背面标注了不同的标签,否则你很难分辨出上一代Zenfone和Zenfone 10的区别--尺寸仅有细微差别,Zenfone 10重了3克。普通用户不太可能注意到这些差异。

Zenfone再次提供多种颜色。这次,除了红色、蓝色、黑色和白色之外,还增加了浅绿色。然而,并不是每种颜色都有内存/存储配置可供选择:如果您选择256GB存储空间,您将拥有最多的选择。其中一些颜色(红色、白色、绿色)使用了可持续塑料。

正面的屏幕边缘非常明显,但屏幕面积为84%,至少仍处于平均水平。屏幕由大猩猩Victus玻璃加固,因此可以很好地防止碎裂和损坏。此外,该机再次通过了IP68认证,因此用户不必担心智能手机掉进水里。

坚固的金属框架和粗糙的背面给人留下了非常高品质的印象。这款智能手机的表面处理干净利落,各种材料融为一体,没有任何明显的棱角。

华硕Zenfone 10
华硕Zenfone 10
华硕Zenfone 10
华硕Zenfone 10
华硕Zenfone 10

尺寸比较

153 mm 67 mm 8.3 mm 161 g146.5 mm 68 mm 9.4 mm 172 g146.5 mm 68.1 mm 9.1 mm 169 g146.3 mm 70.9 mm 7.6 mm 167 g131.5 mm 64.2 mm 7.65 mm 140 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - Zenfone 仅配备 USB 2.0

华硕Zenfone 10有三种内存/存储配置,价格各不相同:

  • 8GB内存/128GB:799美元
  • 8GB内存/256GB:849美元
  • 16GB内存/512GB:929美元

与前代产品一样,USB-C接口仅通过USB 2.0内部连接,因此无法进行图像传输,数据传输速度也低于其他一些高端智能手机。作为回报,华硕安装了3.5mm接口,这无疑会让经典耳机插孔的粉丝们感到高兴。

NFC可用于无线支付服务和其他用途,但没有microSD读卡器用于扩展。

右侧:音量摇杆、待机键和指纹传感器
右侧:音量摇杆、待机键和指纹传感器
左:无端口
左:无端口
顶部:3.5毫米音频接口,麦克风
顶部:3.5毫米音频接口,麦克风
底部:扬声器、USB-C接口、麦克风、SIM卡插槽
底部:扬声器、USB-C接口、麦克风、SIM卡插槽

软件 - 长期更新承诺

华硕为Zenfone 10提供了接近原版的Android 13,几乎没有安装任何额外的软件。一个非常积极的方面是,您可以在菜单中选择是否要采用华硕的小调整或完全不改变Android 。安全补丁是从2023年6月开始的,因此仍然是最新的。

根据制造商的说法,应该有4年的更新时间,外加2个新版本的操作系统,即直到Android 15。

华硕Zenfone 10的软件
华硕Zenfone 10的软件
华硕Zenfone 10的软件

通信和GNSS - 支持WiFi 7

对于所有技术爱好者来说,WiFi 7支持是向前迈出的一步,因为它可以使用6 GHz频段,并且可以实现更广泛的传输信道。

然而,在我们的测试中,华硕Zenfone 10在数据传输速率方面出现了一些波动,就像前代产品一样。虽然这些波动与Zenfone 9、最高数据传输率也没有那么高。尽管如此,华硕Zenfone 10仍能可靠地充分利用gibabit网络连接。

在靠近路由器的地方可以保证完全的信号强度,网站加载速度非常快。在10米的距离和穿过3面墙时,信号略有减弱,但主观上我们注意到速度差别不大。

当然,我们支持5G蜂窝网络,而且4G频率非常多,几乎可以保证在世界任何地方都能移动上网。在我们的测试过程中,接收和信号强度都非常好,与其他高端智能手机相当。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1659 (1603min - 1686max) MBit/s
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
919 (892min - 936max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=188, last 2 years)
719 MBit/s
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
690 (674min - 705max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1749 (1253min - 1880max) MBit/s
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
938 (470min - 957max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=190, last 2 years)
736 MBit/s
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
715 (357min - 729max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1799 (1744min - 1867max) MBit/s +21%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1715 (801min - 1773max) MBit/s +15%
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1492 (1309min - 1602max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (229 - 1945, n=79, last 2 years)
1451 MBit/s -3%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1602 (797min - 1629max) MBit/s +20%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1590 (1562min - 1612max) MBit/s +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (668 - 1864, n=79, last 2 years)
1385 MBit/s +4%
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1334 (1068min - 1407max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
405 (198min - 498max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
620 (297min - 709max) MBit/s
0851702553404255105956807658509351020110511901275136014451530Tooltip
Asus Zenfone 10; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1492 (1309-1602)
Asus Zenfone 10; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1334 (1068-1407)
室外GPS测试
室外GPS测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

Zenfone 10能够利用所有主要的卫星网络确定其位置。在您走出家门后不久,就能以 3 米的精度确定您的位置。找到的卫星种类很多,但没有使用SBAS来进一步提高精确度。

为了测试这款智能手机的实际跟踪能力,我们骑上自行车,并将Garmin Venu 2智能手表作为对比设备。Zenfone 10显示出轻微的误差,例如,将我们稍微放在路边,或者让我们穿过房屋。但总的来说,我们喜欢它的准确性。只要不要求绝对精确,这款智能手机非常适合作为日常导航设备使用。

华硕Zenfone 10的本地化 - 概述
华硕Zenfone 10的本地化 - 概述
华硕Zenfone 10的本地化 - 循环
华硕Zenfone 10的本地化 - 循环
华硕Zenfone 10的本地化 - 桥梁
华硕Zenfone 10的本地化 - 桥梁
Garmin Venu 2的本地化 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2的本地化 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2的定位 - 回路
Garmin Venu 2的定位 - 回路
Garmin Venu 2的本地化 - 桥梁
Garmin Venu 2的本地化 - 桥梁

电话和语音质量 - 中等语音质量

华硕使用了自己的电话应用程序,与谷歌的标准应用程序相比,华硕的应用程序显得有些瘦弱。但后者可以轻松安装并被选为默认应用。遗憾的是,Zenfone 10不支持eSIM卡。

在几次测试通话过程中,我们发现通话质量相当一般:听筒中可以听到清晰的背景噪音,如沙沙声,但通话对象的声音仍然清晰可辨。此外,Zenfone 10的最大音量听起来相当适中,因此在嘈杂的环境中理解我们的通话对象可能会有问题。

偶尔,扬声器会传来对方的轻微回声,这听起来似乎是噪音抑制器在努力工作。然而,这导致我们很难或根本听不懂通话者所说的某些内容。

总体而言,我们的声音传输效果很好,但说话声音不应太小。

相机 - 最好有更大的灵活性

使用前置摄像头拍照
使用前置摄像头拍照

主摄像头与上一代产品相比仅取得了微不足道的进步:传感器仍采用5000万像素的索尼IMX766。只有云台功能再次进行了改进,该功能旨在保护相机免受强烈晃动的影响。

Zenfone 10拍摄的照片色彩丰富,但在细节丰富度方面无法与真正的高端智能手机相媲美。在拍摄周围环境时,细节清晰度较低。主摄像头在光线不足时拍摄的照片效果尚可,但在非常暗的区域动态效果欠佳。

Zenfone 10摄像头系统的真正缺点是灵活性较低:虽然广角摄像头拍摄的照片还算合格,但很难与配备潜望镜变焦摄像头的智能手机相媲美,因为很难在不损失细节的情况下靠近物体。这是因为只有数码变焦最多能提供2倍的足够图像质量。之后,照片会变得非常粗糙。

可拍摄8K视频,但只能以24帧/秒的速度拍摄。4K视频为60帧/秒。自动对焦在录制过程中反应迅速、可靠,但亮度调节有时略显粗糙。拍摄的视频质量一般都不错。

前置摄像头的分辨率为3,200万像素,但为了获得更高的光输出而进行像素分档,最终只能获得800万像素的照片。在光线充足的情况下,这些照片的质量较高,在较暗的区域仍能显示出不错的细节。

更多来自Zenfone 10摄像头的照片以及其他与高端智能手机的直接对比可以在我们的详细的相机测试我们在里斯本进行了测试。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera - flowerMain camera - environmentMain camera - low lightWide angle camera
orginal image
click to load images

主摄像头也在测试实验室中进行了测试:在全棚照明下拍摄的照片效果良好,图像清晰度较高,尤其是中心部分,但边缘部分的清晰度略有下降。色彩和对比度显示准确。

在1勒克斯照度下,主体非常模糊,但色彩仍能准确再现。

ColorChecker
14.2 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
8 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus Zenfone 10: 9.24 ∆E min: 2.81 - max: 15.7 ∆E
ColorChecker
11.8 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
11 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
5 ∆E
8 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
9 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
0.5 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus Zenfone 10: 6.76 ∆E min: 0.54 - max: 12.55 ∆E

配件和保修 - 含保护盒

除了充电器、USB数据线和SIM卡工具外,Zenfone 10的包装盒还包括一个塑料保护套,可保护智能手机免受跌落。

华硕的配件商店提供其他配套保护套,以及一套配件,包括保护套、支架和一个可放置信用卡的口袋。整套价格约为50美元。此外,还提供屏幕保护膜,价格约为30美元。

华硕提供24个月的保修保修期为24个月。其他地区的保修期可能有所不同,因此买家在购买前应仔细确认。

输入设备和操作 - 结构紧凑,配备出色的指纹传感器

在操作方面,Zenfone 10有几个特别之处。一方面,其小巧的外形使其易于使用,即使是小手也不例外。144赫兹的显示屏在游戏之外提供最高120赫兹的显示频率,但由于滚动流畅,操作起来仍然感觉非常流畅。

触摸屏可在整个表面上精确可靠地操作。还可在设置中激活手套模式,使屏幕更加灵敏,并允许戴薄手套使用。

手机壳右侧的指纹传感器几乎可以立即解锁手机,识别率非常高。还可以通过指纹传感器上的手势激活某些系统功能,华硕称之为ZenTouch。面部识别也是另一种解锁方式,但它仅适用于2D图像,因此安全性较低。

横向键盘
横向键盘
纵向键盘
纵向键盘

显示屏 - AMOLED,最高144 Hz

子像素矩阵
子像素矩阵

华硕Zenfone 10的AMOLED屏幕提供了增强的全高清分辨率,因此在同类产品中处于领先地位。在屏幕亮度方面,它的平均亮度为 789 cd/m²,仍然非常适合较亮的环境,但与三星 Zenfone 10 的平均亮度相比,它的亮度要低得多。 三星Galaxy S23显示出更大的可能性。

色彩表现也不像其他智能手机那样准确,一些灰阶色调显示出轻微的偏绿。浅棕色调也略微偏离最佳值,但总体而言,该屏幕非常适合日常使用,并能提供绚丽的色彩。只有在色彩值必须精确的情况下,您才应该考虑其他更好的智能手机。

该屏幕可处理高达144 Hz的帧速率。然而,这只能在游戏中设置;在所有其他应用中最高为120 Hz。

787
cd/m²
752
cd/m²
812
cd/m²
781
cd/m²
797
cd/m²
802
cd/m²
779
cd/m²
789
cd/m²
799
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 812 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 788.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 797 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.64 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.238
Asus Zenfone 10
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 5.9"
Asus Zenfone 9
AMOLED , 2400x1080, 5.9"
Sony Xperia 10 IV
OLED, 2520x1080, 6"
Apple iPhone 13 mini
OLED, 2340x1080, 5.4"
Samsung Galaxy S23
Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 2340x1080, 6.1"
Screen
0%
19%
24%
-11%
Brightness middle
797
793
-1%
572
-28%
851
7%
1125
41%
Brightness
789
796
1%
580
-26%
847
7%
1122
42%
Brightness Distribution
93
97
4%
96
3%
98
5%
96
3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.64
1.9
48%
0.9
75%
1
73%
3.2
12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.92
3.4
-77%
1.2
37%
2
-4%
4.9
-155%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.1
2.3
26%
1.4
55%
1.4
55%
3.3
-6%
Gamma
2.238 98%
2.26 97%
2.29 96%
2.21 100%
1.97 112%
CCT
6531 100%
6860 95%
6614 98%
6423 101%
6504 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 238.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 238.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 238.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低亮度
最低亮度
25%亮度
25%亮度
50%亮度
50%亮度
75%亮度
75%亮度
100%亮度
100%亮度

在固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置下进行的系列测量

我们检测到PWM闪烁,几乎所有OLED屏幕都会出现这种情况。闪烁频率为238 Hz,而且频率波动很大,因此敏感用户在购买前一定要试用屏幕。直流调光模式可用,但帧速率仅限于60 Hz。

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN色彩精度
CalMAN色彩精度
CalMAN sRGB色彩空间
CalMAN sRGB色彩空间
卡尔曼AdobeRGB色彩空间
卡尔曼AdobeRGB色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3色彩空间
卡尔曼饱和度
卡尔曼饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6 ms rise
↘ 0.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.9 ms rise
↘ 0.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

即使在晴天,智能手机在户外也足够明亮。从侧面观看,屏幕内容仍然清晰可见。

性能 - 目前几乎不可能提供更多

得益于 高通骁龙8代2Zenfone 10在性能方面与当前的旗舰智能手机相当。您可以在菜单中选择手机是提供最大功率,还是优化电池寿命。

无论如何,无论是处理器、系统还是人工智能测试,Zenfone 10在基准测试中都没有暴露出任何弱点。在日常生活中,您不必担心智能手机没有足够的电量来运行某个应用程序,也不必担心在多任务处理时会出现问题。例如,在浏览网页或使用其他应用程序时,您可以轻松地在浮动窗口中观看流媒体视频。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 13 mini
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
1729 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1549 Points +6%
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1462 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1048 - 1574, n=20)
1455 Points 0%
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
1322 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=174, last 2 years)
1021 Points -30%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
670 Points -54%
Multi-Core
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
4999 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
4974 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (4192 - 5243, n=20)
4918 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
4559 Points -9%
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
4436 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=174, last 2 years)
3404 Points -32%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1909 Points -62%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
2021 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1984 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1432 - 2104, n=17)
1926 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=165, last 2 years)
1478 Points -27%
Multi-Core
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5496 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (4255 - 5765, n=17)
5226 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
5149 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=165, last 2 years)
4126 Points -25%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1308479 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1111522 - 1322448, n=17)
1259049 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1134684 Points -13%
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
1081005 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=105, last 2 years)
810387 Points -38%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
722973 Points -45%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
386185 Points -70%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
17824 Points
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
16528 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (11562 - 20394, n=24)
15817 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
15270 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 26863, n=191, last 2 years)
13055 Points -27%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6897 Points -61%
CrossMark - Overall
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1266 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1221 Points -4%
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
1163 Points -8%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
1145 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (778 - 1356, n=22)
1138 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2044, n=160, last 2 years)
894 Points -29%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
574 Points -55%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
9679 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
8830 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (7354 - 9730, n=22)
8794 Points -9%
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
8273 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=154, last 2 years)
6363 Points -34%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3721 Points -62%
System
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
15148 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
14401 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (10786 - 15148, n=22)
13173 Points -13%
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
12637 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=154, last 2 years)
10203 Points -33%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
8043 Points -47%
Memory
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
10650 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (6601 - 10834, n=22)
9479 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
8871 Points -17%
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
8263 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=154, last 2 years)
6843 Points -36%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4580 Points -57%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (22837 - 32334, n=22)
27375 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
26748 Points 0%
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
26616 Points
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
22938 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)
17343 Points -35%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4421 Points -83%
Web
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
2044 Points
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
1982 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1779 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1077 - 2044, n=22)
1777 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=154, last 2 years)
1569 Points -23%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1178 Points -42%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
82462 Points +421%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 75143, n=146, last 2 years)
17392 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
16702 Points +6%
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
15827 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (11338 - 16880, n=21)
15142 Points -4%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
9348 Points -41%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (941 - 173234, n=18)
29790 Points +1995%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=138, last 2 years)
25706 Points +1708%
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1422 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1320 Points -7%

图形处理能力也非常强大。例如,1440p分辨率下的基准测试运行速度超过60帧/秒,而在1080p分辨率下甚至超过了屏幕的最大帧率。只有在4K分辨率下才能达到29帧/秒。

不过,由于大多数手机游戏都无法选择如此高的分辨率,因此图形处理能力应能轻松满足当前的应用需求。Zenfone 10在未来的表现也会相当出色。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3717 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3699 Points 0%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2698 Points -27%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
2151 Points -42%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
355 Points -90%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3857 Points +3%
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3749 Points
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2754 Points -27%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
2243 Points -40%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
361 Points -90%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
60.1 fps -50%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
481 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
459 fps -5%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
381 fps -21%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
375.2 fps -22%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
95 fps -80%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
116 fps -3%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
60.1 fps -50%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
39 fps -67%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
325 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
271 fps -17%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
176 fps -46%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
165.9 fps -49%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
48 fps -85%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
88 fps -27%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
60.1 fps -50%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
26 fps -78%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
223 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
186 fps -17%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
125.1 fps -44%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
114 fps -49%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps -84%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
110 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps -1%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 fps -30%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
54 fps -51%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16 fps -85%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
130 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
123 fps -5%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
84 fps -35%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
68.8 fps -47%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps -85%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +11%
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
86 fps -2%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
56.6 fps -36%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
11 fps -87%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps +2%
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
62 fps
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -29%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
34.56 fps -44%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8.2 fps -87%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps -18%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
60.1 fps -50%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
18 fps -85%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
155 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
141 fps -9%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps -28%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
95.9 fps -38%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps -85%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps +3%
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
29 fps
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps -28%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3.6 fps -88%

Zenfone 10的网页浏览速度通常比其他紧凑型高端智能手机稍慢。不过,大型网站的加载速度很快,滚动时通常已经可以看到图片。在日常使用中,它的速度确实可以更快一些,但这只是小问题。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 mini (Safari 15)
177.9 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
158.595 Points +16%
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104)
147.648 Points +8%
Asus Zenfone 10 (Chrome 114)
136.238 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.7 - 179.2, n=23)
133.1 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=164, last 2 years)
121.7 Points -11%
Sony Xperia 10 IV (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
57.351 Points -58%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 13 mini (Safari 15)
240 runs/min +129%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.9 - 225, n=18)
141.6 runs/min +35%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=150, last 2 years)
139.5 runs/min +33%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
136 runs/min +30%
Asus Zenfone 10 (Chome 114)
105 runs/min
Asus Zenfone 9
102 runs/min -3%
Sony Xperia 10 IV (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
46.2 runs/min -56%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 13 mini (Safari 16)
189 Points +36%
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104)
146 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
146 Points +5%
Asus Zenfone 10 (Chrome 114)
139 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (28 - 183, n=22)
130.6 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=155, last 2 years)
114.5 Points -18%
Sony Xperia 10 IV (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
59 Points -58%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 13 mini (Safari 15)
252 Points +25%
Asus Zenfone 10 (Chrome 114)
201 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (115 - 238, n=11)
197.5 Points -2%
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104)
168 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points -26%
Sony Xperia 10 IV (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
78 Points -61%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 mini (Safari 15)
62629 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
59913 Points +39%
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104)
54646 Points +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (19870 - 65418, n=25)
45827 Points +7%
Asus Zenfone 10 (Chrome 114)
42998 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
37721 Points -12%
Sony Xperia 10 IV (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
21839 Points -49%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Sony Xperia 10 IV (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
1981.7 ms * -96%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years)
1551 ms * -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (602 - 1837, n=22)
1023 ms * -1%
Asus Zenfone 10 (Chrome 114)
1009 ms *
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104)
768.66 ms * +24%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
701.7 ms * +30%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
446.8 ms * +56%

* ... smaller is better

UFS 4.0存储是Zenfone 10的一大优势,因为它比Zenfone 9的数据传输速度更快。 Zenfone 9的UFS 3.1闪存更快。这意味着复制过程可以非常快速地进行,加载时间也更短。

然而,令人讨厌的是,Zenfone 10仍然只有一个USB 2.0端口,这在与外部设备传输数据时往往被证明是一个瓶颈。

Asus Zenfone 10Asus Zenfone 9Sony Xperia 10 IVSamsung Galaxy S23Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-36%
-73%
-47%
-6%
-44%
Sequential Read 256KB
3517.3
1986.97
-44%
521.1
-85%
3133.7 ?(UFS 4.0)
-11%

1686.71 ?(UFS 3.1)
-52%

Sequential Write 256KB
3041.5
1776.21
-42%
497.61
-84%
844 ?(UFS 4.0)
-72%

628.53 ?(UFS 3.1)
-79%

Random Read 4KB
418.1
298.46
-29%
192.5
-54%
427.61 ?(UFS 4.0)
2%

343.65 ?(UFS 3.1)
-18%

Random Write 4KB
559.4
398.39
-29%
177.83
-68%
156.69 ?(UFS 4.0)
-72%

130.26 ?(UFS 3.1)
-77%

游戏 - 面向未来

Zenfone 10的屏幕最高可达144 Hz,非常适合流畅的游戏,但几乎没有任何游戏可以达到如此高的帧率。至少,这款智能手机在RPG游戏《暗黑破坏神:不朽》中可以达到稳定的60帧/秒,在《PUBG Mobile》中几乎在所有设置下都可以达到这一帧率。在UltraHD游戏中,帧率仅降至40帧。帧率测试软件来自GameBench。.

Zenfone 10完全满足当前游戏的需求,但我们的测试设备在游戏过程中会变得非常热。

手机
手机
暗黑破坏神:不朽
暗黑破坏神:不朽
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Asus Zenfone 10; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.6.0: Ø59.8 (57-61)
Asus Zenfone 10; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 2.6.0: Ø40 (39-41)
Asus Zenfone 10; Diablo Immortal; Medium Mobile Low; 2.0.0: Ø59.8 (59-60)
Asus Zenfone 10; Diablo Immortal; Ultra Mobile Very High; 2.0.0: Ø59.8 (58-60)

排放 - 热态,但几乎没有性能损失

温度

与前代产品相比,Zenfone 10在长时间负载的情况下发热很高,温度很高,握持起来不再舒适。我们的测试是一种极端情况,但在长时间、高要求的游戏过程中以及在温暖的环境温度下肯定会达到这种水平。

幸运的是,在3DMark压力测试中,智能手机没有死机,处理器也没有受到机箱高温的影响。处理器没有出现严重节流并保持低温的情况,而是温度居高不下,但性能也是如此。

如果您想限制发热量,并能承受牺牲一点性能的代价,您可以在菜单 "系统模式 "下找到各种设置,这些设置可以降低一点功耗,从而延长电池寿命。

Max. Load
 54.7 °C53.9 °C48.8 °C 
 55.8 °C55 °C48.7 °C 
 55.3 °C54.3 °C47.9 °C 
Maximum: 55.8 °C
Average: 52.7 °C
43.8 °C50.7 °C49.8 °C
44.5 °C50.8 °C56.2 °C
45.7 °C51.1 °C57.9 °C
Maximum: 57.9 °C
Average: 50.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  43.9 °C | Room Temperature 25.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 52.7 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55.8 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 57.9 °C / 136 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99.7 %
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68.6 % -31%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
64.8 % -35%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53.1 % -47%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98.9 % +21%
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.7 %
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
73.1 % -11%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53.8 % -34%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52.8 % -35%
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Asus Zenfone 10 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø15.9 (15.7-19.2)
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø12.3 (8.84-16.7)
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)
Apple iPhone 13 mini A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø10.7 (10-13.7)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø15.5 (12.4-23.1)
Asus Zenfone 10 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø56.5 (56.5-56.6)
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø45.8 (33.4-62.9)
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.24 (7.24-7.27)
Apple iPhone 13 mini A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø42.1 (36.1-55.7)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø58.5 (52.3-76.3)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø66.7 (56-85.8)
热成像 - 正面
热成像 - 正面
热成像 - 背面
热成像 - 背面

扬声器

Zenfone 10配备了混合立体声扬声器,这意味着屏幕上方的听筒被用作第二个扬声器。当然,第二个扬声器也使声音整体更加饱满。

扬声器的音量为83.2 dB(A),在需要时足够响亮。它们能很好地应对不同风格的音乐,即使在最大音量时也不会过载。不过,它们听起来总是有点高音偏重,中音或低音不足。

喜欢连接模拟耳机的用户可以在Zenfone 10上获得一个3.5毫米音频接口,这在昂贵的智能手机上并不多见。声音和通过蓝牙5.3连接时一样干净,这里有许多编解码器:除了SBC和AAC,还有aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、aptX TWS+、LDAC和LC3。因此,有大量可传输高清音频的高品质无线编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204347.92535.436.83132.529.6403533.7503841.66328.529.38021.127.31002133.312520.93816019.743.220014.744.925013.648.631511.95240012.657.750014.462.363014.563.480015.662.8100012.569.6125012.872.8160011.173.9200011.974.3250011.975.2315013.173.8400014.471.6500015.963630015.964.6800016.364.7100001758.4125001759.61600017.657.7SPL26.583.2N0.850.9median 14.5median 62.8Delta2.210.133.839.127.936.924.332.928.234.636.742.822.238.925.439.52141.918.646.715.453.515.155.613.160.11262.412.762.911.866.912.966.710.471.513.375.913.278.412.178.912.281.212.981.414.88115.881.716.180.714.481.813.67913.576.814.471.41567.825.991.50.788median 13.5median 75.91.39.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus Zenfone 10Samsung Galaxy S23
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus Zenfone 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S23 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 适合日常使用,但并不出色

耗电量

事实上,处理器的性能没有受到限制,这一点在能耗方面也很明显。虽然在负载情况下能耗较高,但在低负载情况下能耗处于正常水平。

与上一代产品一样,这款智能手机的充电功率可达30瓦。当电池完全耗尽时,大约需要90分钟才能再次显示100%的电量。一项重大创新是Zenfone 10现在还支持高达15瓦的无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.1 / 1.5 Watt
Load midlight 7.6 / 11 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Zenfone 10
4300 mAh
Asus Zenfone 9
4300 mAh
Sony Xperia 10 IV
5000 mAh
Apple iPhone 13 mini
2406 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S23
3900 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
19%
16%
30%
41%
-19%
-3%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
1.01
-12%
0.68
24%
0.57
37%
0.57
37%
1.036 ?(0.7 - 2.37, n=23)
-15%
Idle Average *
1.1
1.1
-0%
1.69
-54%
1.38
-25%
0.74
33%
1.766 ?(0.8 - 7.18, n=23)
-61%
Idle Maximum *
1.5
1.17
22%
1.73
-15%
1.41
6%
0.83
45%
1.94 ?(1.07 - 8.22, n=23)
-29%
Load Average *
7.6
3.3
57%
2.54
67%
2.65
65%
4.26
44%
Load Maximum *
11
7.89
28%
4.61
58%
3.56
68%
6.16
44%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Asus Zenfone 10; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.05 (0.919-11.5)
Asus Zenfone 10; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.187 (1.064-1.488)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Asus Zenfone 10; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.3 (9.96-10.9)
Asus Zenfone 10; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.187 (1.064-1.488)

电池寿命

电池容量为 4,300 mAh,与 Zenfone 9 相同。Zenfone 9的电池容量相同,因此比诸如 iPhone 13 mini三星Galaxy S23.

然而,正如测试所示,这并不自动意味着更好的运行时间。事实证明,华硕Zenfone在负载和观看存储视频时的续航时间更长一些,但我们的测试设备的WLAN浏览时间仅为14小时左右,处于平均水平。

尽管如此,您应该可以度过一个工作日,即使是加班的人也应该还有一些剩余电量。但是,如果您经常使用智能手机,您将无法避免每天晚上充电。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
31h 04min
WiFi Websurfing
13h 57min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
22h 32min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 46min
Asus Zenfone 10
4300 mAh
Asus Zenfone 9
4300 mAh
Sony Xperia 10 IV
5000 mAh
Apple iPhone 13 mini
2406 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S23
3900 mAh
Battery Runtime
2%
41%
5%
4%
Reader / Idle
1864
1685
-10%
3760
102%
3107
67%
2249
21%
H.264
1352
1401
4%
1578
17%
1043
-23%
1255
-7%
WiFi v1.3
837
825
-1%
1168
40%
849
1%
926
11%
Load
406
462
14%
429
6%
302
-26%
370
-9%

Pros

+ 系统性能高
+ 紧凑型 IP 认证外壳
+ 长期定期的软件更新
+ 多种系统设置
+ 丰富的配件
+ 精确快速的指纹传感器
+ 几乎没有节流
+ 3.5 毫米音频接口
+ 无线充电

Cons

- 相机系统灵活性较差
- 不支持 eSIM 卡
- 部分语音质量一般
- 发热严重
- USB2.0 接口速度慢

结论 - 结构紧凑,动力强劲

回顾:华硕Zenfone 10.测试设备由华硕德国提供。
回顾:华硕Zenfone 10.测试设备由华硕德国提供。

华硕的Zenfone 10将取悦所有认为当前旗舰手机过于笨重的人:这款小巧轻便的智能手机根据要求配备了大量内存,其运行速度也像箭一样快。它具有极高的系统性能、较长的软件更新时间、快速的WiFi 7和时尚的IP认证外壳,并有更亮丽的颜色可供选择。

不过,这款智能手机的售价为749美元,竞争对手是 三星Galaxy S23Apple 13 mini的竞争,您必须接受它的一些弱点。例如,与三星的旗舰产品相比,该机的摄像头缺乏光学变焦功能,这降低了摄像头设置的灵活性。与iPhone相比,图像清晰度较低。

屏幕还可以再亮一些,高负载下手机的强发热令人讨厌,电池续航能力一般。华硕在Zenfone 10中安装了一个USB 2.0接口,这也不能让人感到高兴。但是,如果用户想要一个3.5mm接口和高性能,那么Zenfone 10是很难满足他们的需求的。

Zenfone 9相比,Zenfone 10的变化不大,但更快的存储速度和无线充电功能非常突出。

Zenfone 10是上一代产品的试探性升级,其紧凑的尺寸和高性能令人信服。

价格 三星Galaxy S23由于三星S23的价格在此期间大幅下降,其变焦相机和更亮的屏幕使其成为强有力的竞争对手。袩褉芯胁芯写褋褌胁械薪薪褘械 Zenfone 9Zenfone 9的价格也更便宜,买家只需满足一些小缺点,如存储速度稍慢。

价格和供货情况

华硕Zenfone 10目前可通过美国亚马逊购买,配置为8GB/256GB,售价799美元。有蓝色白色 黑色可供选择。随着该智能手机的逐步推出,其他内存配置预计将在未来几周内陆续上市。

价格截至2023年7月13日,可能会有变动。

Asus Zenfone 10 - 07/12/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
89%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
95%
Connectivity
56 / 70 → 80%
Weight
90%
Battery
91%
Display
91%
Games Performance
65 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
96 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
80%
Noise
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
77%
Average
83%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕Zenfone 10评测:功能强大的紧凑型5G智能手机
Florian Schmitt, 2023-07-14 (Update: 2024-08-15)