vivo X90 Pro智能手机评测--联发科的高端SoC能否跟上骁龙8代的步伐?
在我们已经回顾了X90系列的实际旗舰,即 vivo X90 Pro+,它只在中国或作为进口产品出售,我们将仔细看看欧洲的顶级机型。vivo X90 Pro也依靠一个带有蔡司品牌的相机系统和索尼的大型IMX989图像传感器,采用1英寸格式。
vivo X90 Pro的功能也令人印象深刻。6.78英寸、120赫兹的三星E6 AMOLED面板的峰值亮度为1300尼特,以及快速的联发科Dimensity 9200芯片组,由12GB的内存和256GB的存储支持。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.1 % | 02/2023 | Vivo X90 Pro Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11 | 214.9 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.78" | 2800x1260 | |
89.1 % | 02/2023 | Xiaomi 13 SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740 | 189 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.36" | 2400x1080 | |
89.1 % | 11/2022 | Google Pixel 7 Pro Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7 | 212 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" | 3120x1440 | |
87 % | 08/2022 | OnePlus 10T SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730 | 203.5 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" | 2412x1080 | |
90 % | 02/2023 | Vivo X90 Pro+ SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740 | 221 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.78" | 3200x1440 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
保护壳 - Vivo X90 Pro带冲孔的保护壳
vivo X90 Pro提供,像 Pro+型号,一种皮革质地,背面有一个巨大的相机模块--中国制造商称之为黄金比例的天际线设计。除此之外,两款X90智能手机的外观都非常相似,价值也值得强调。与前代产品类似,X90 Pro在本地市场上只有黑色版本。灰色变体也可作为进口设备。
与 X80 Pro一样。X90 Pro符合IP68标准,具有防尘和防水功能。这款高档手机的屏幕占正面总面积的比例为90.8%,非常有效。说到显示屏,制造商没有说明在X90 Pro中安装了哪种保护玻璃。
设备 - 配备UFS 4.0的Vivo智能手机
在设备方面,X90 Pro具有双扬声器系统、蓝牙5.3、快速UFS 4.0存储和用于非接触式支付的NFC芯片。此外,vivo依靠一个USB 3.2端口(Gen. 1),可以实现高数据传输,并通过HDMI或DisplayPort接口进行有线图像输出。在我们的拷贝测试中,包括一个连接的M2.SSD硬盘(三星980 Pro),USB端口的传输速率为212 MB/s,明显低于理论峰值水平。
软件 - Vivo手机与Android 13
通信和GNSS - Vivo X90 Pro带WiFi 6E
由于WLAN模块与我们的参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000在2.4和5GHz范围内以及通过6GHz频段进行通信,因此vivo手机的家庭网络传输率很高。然而,5-和6-GHz范围内的低接收率是明显的。访问包括许多支持的4G频率的LTE网络是有保证的,而且切换到快速的5G标准也是可能的。
Networking | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Xiaomi 13 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Google Pixel 7 Pro | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
OnePlus 10T | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
Vivo X90 Pro+ | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
Average of class Smartphone | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
手机功能和语音质量--带双卡的vivo手机
这款双SIM卡智能手机支持VoLTE,也允许通过家庭WLAN(WiFi通话)进行通话。与 前辈vivo旗舰机现在支持eSIM。
X90 Pro的语音质量并不显眼。声音再现得很干净,我们的对话者也将其描述为清晰。
相机--vivo智能手机的1英寸传感器
3200万像素的前置摄像头能够实现体面的自拍,但人像模式的照片相对较暗,很是显眼。
背面带有蔡司品牌的相机组的中心部分是,与 X90 Pro+大的1英寸索尼传感器,在白天和晚上都能提供非常好的照片。照片有时看起来太亮了,但有很好的基本锐度--有时自动对焦并不总是适合(见兔子图案)。照片往往有点柔和,这一点不如 Apple iPhone 14 Pro与iPhone 14 Pro的过度锐化的照片相比,更加自然。在色彩还原方面,vivo手机不能完全让人信服;绿色调显示得有点太亮了。然而,喜欢自然色彩的用户可以激活蔡司模式。
与之相反的是 前辈X90 Pro没有高分辨率的超广角摄像头。即使在良好的光线条件下,照片看起来也有点嘈杂,缺乏细节。作为回报,vivo手机有相当好的变焦质量,尽管它没有潜望镜相机,只有2倍无损变焦。然而,X90 Pro保留了许多细节,最高可放大5倍。专用的vivo V2图像处理器和内部软件优化确保了这方面的坚实图像质量。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide-angleLow Light5x Zoom![ColorChecker](fileadmin/_processed_/3/0/csm_Foto_VivoX90Pro_ColorChecker_2ca62af733.jpg)
![ColorChecker](fileadmin/_processed_/5/2/csm_Foto_VivoX90Pro_ColorChecker_1Lux_0cd3441a5a.jpg)
配件和保修 - Vivo X90 Pro带电源适配器
vivo手机配备了一个模块化的120瓦电源,一条USB线和一个保护套。出厂时还安装了一个保护膜。
保修 保修期是购买日期后的24个月。
输入设备和操作 - 带有超声波指纹传感器的vivo手机
显示屏 - Vivo X90 Pro采用OLED技术
乍一看,显示屏没有什么变化。与前代产品一样,X90 Pro的OLED面板对角线尺寸为6.78英寸,刷新率高达120 Hz。频率的自适应调整仍然是不可能的,但可以在60赫兹和120赫兹之间自动切换。在像素密度方面有很大差别。虽然 Vivo X80 Pro配备了QHD+分辨率,而X90 Pro的AMOLED显示屏只能使用全高清+。
vivo智能手机使用频率很低的60赫兹的PWM来控制亮度,这是典型的OLED,但波动很小。在我们测量的峰值中,超过1000cd/m²的最大亮度是非常好的,而现实的APL18测试(平均图像水平)也使这个价格范围内的1225cd/m²的最大亮度令人满意。A 小米13的亮度要高得多,为1765cd/m²。
|
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 1018 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Vivo X90 Pro AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.8" | Xiaomi 13 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | Google Pixel 7 Pro OLED, 3120x1440, 6.7" | OnePlus 10T Fluid AMOLED, 2412x1080, 6.7" | Vivo X90 Pro+ AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.8" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -6% | 9% | -54% | -5% | |
Brightness middle | 1018 | 1209 19% | 1022 0% | 861 -15% | 1109 9% |
Brightness | 1026 | 1208 18% | 1025 0% | 856 -17% | 1124 10% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 98 5% | 99 6% | 97 4% | 96 3% |
Black Level * | |||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.9 | 1.2 -33% | 0.9 -0% | 2.27 -152% | 1.1 -22% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.2 | 3 -36% | 2.1 5% | 4.17 -90% | 2.7 -23% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 2.1 -11% | 1.1 42% | 2.9 -53% | 2 -5% |
Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.26 97% | 2.22 99% | 2.303 96% | 2.25 98% |
CCT | 6473 100% | 6504 100% | 6650 98% | 6141 106% | 6605 98% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17373 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
具有固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置的测量系列
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.35 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6915 ms rise | |
↘ 0.6615 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.2 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ ms rise | |
↘ ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.2 ms). |
性能 - 采用联发科SoC的vivo智能手机
X90 Pro采用了联发科的最新旗舰SoC,由台积电以第二代4纳米工艺制造。该芯片组将一个ARM Cortex X3内核(3.05 GHz)与三个ARM Cortex A715性能内核(2.85 GHz)和四个节俭的Cortex A510内核(1.8 GHz)相结合。对于图形单元,联发科依靠新的ARMImmortalis G715有11个内核。
与之相比骁龙8代2中的Pro+型号的单核性能。 联发科Dimensity 9200 降低了7%,多线程性能降低了12%。PCMark的系统基准测试结果也相对较低。
CrossMark - Overall | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Vivo X90 Pro+ | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200 () | |
Google Pixel 7 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 1474, n=155, last 2 years) | |
OnePlus 10T |
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Google Pixel 7 Pro | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200 (40276 - 44483, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 78964, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Vivo X90 Pro+ | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
OnePlus 10T |
AImark - Score v2.x | |
Average of class Smartphone (1043 - 38930, n=10, last 2 years) | |
OnePlus 10T | |
Google Pixel 7 Pro |
MediaTek Dimensity 9200在GFXBench的图形测试中表现良好。然而,即使是屏幕上的速率也经常比在 Pro+型号它必须应付明显更高的分辨率。浏览器基准测试和BaseMark OS II浏览器测试的结果也很明显的低。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Vivo X90 Pro+ | |
OnePlus 10T | |
Google Pixel 7 Pro |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Vivo X90 Pro+ | |
OnePlus 10T | |
Google Pixel 7 Pro |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Vivo X90 Pro+ | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
OnePlus 10T | |
Google Pixel 7 Pro |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Google Pixel 7 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Vivo X90 Pro+ | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
OnePlus 10T |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Vivo X90 Pro+ | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
OnePlus 10T | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Google Pixel 7 Pro |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Vivo X90 Pro+ | |
Google Pixel 7 Pro | |
OnePlus 10T |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Vivo X90 Pro+ | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
OnePlus 10T | |
Google Pixel 7 Pro |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Vivo X90 Pro+ | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
OnePlus 10T | |
Google Pixel 7 Pro |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Vivo X90 Pro+ | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
OnePlus 10T | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Google Pixel 7 Pro |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Vivo X90 Pro+ | |
OnePlus 10T | |
Google Pixel 7 Pro |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Vivo X90 Pro+ | |
OnePlus 10T | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Google Pixel 7 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
OnePlus 10T | |
Vivo X90 Pro+ | |
Google Pixel 7 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Vivo X90 Pro+ | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
OnePlus 10T | |
Google Pixel 7 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Vivo X90 Pro+ | |
OnePlus 10T | |
Google Pixel 7 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Vivo X90 Pro+ | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
OnePlus 10T | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Google Pixel 7 Pro |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108) | |
Vivo X90 Pro+ (Chrome Beta 110) | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=161, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200 (67.6 - 125, n=2) | |
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104) | |
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 445, n=149, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108) | |
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106) | |
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200 (60.2 - 103, n=2) | |
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Vivo X90 Pro+ (Chrome Beta 110) | |
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108) | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 212, n=152, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106) | |
OnePlus 10T | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200 (22 - 134, n=3) | |
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 304, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200 (82 - 142, n=2) | |
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104) | |
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106) | |
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106) | |
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108) | |
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=204, last 2 years) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200 (21648 - 45823, n=2) | |
Vivo X90 Pro+ (Chrome Beta 110) | |
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109) | |
Vivo X90 Pro+ (Chrome Beta 110) | |
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) | |
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200 (918 - 1848, n=2) | |
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106) | |
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108) |
* ... smaller is better
Vivo X90 Pro | Xiaomi 13 | Google Pixel 7 Pro | OnePlus 10T | Vivo X90 Pro+ | Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 1% | -56% | -60% | -3% | -6% | -44% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 3866.75 | 3454.01 -11% | 1346.78 -65% | 1568.37 -59% | 3397.4 -12% | 3565 ? -8% | 1722 ? -55% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 2643.38 | 2722.77 3% | 874.73 -67% | 847.69 -68% | 2834.4 7% | 2520 ? -5% | 1330 ? -50% |
Random Read 4KB | 367.89 | 393.81 7% | 219.01 -40% | 173.45 -53% | 373.88 2% | 414 ? 13% | 265 ? -28% |
Random Write 4KB | 521.43 | 536.76 3% | 253.18 -51% | 211.24 -59% | 484.29 -7% | 389 ? -25% | 291 ? -44% |
游戏--vivo手机只能管理60帧的画面
的图形性能。 画面性能的Immortalis G715为像PUBG手机这样的高要求游戏提供了足够的图形性能,即使在最高细节下也能以持续的40帧的速度流畅播放。射击游戏在高清图形设置下以约60 FPS的速度不断播放,由于vivo方面的帧锁定,新的90帧模式无法使用--我们使用GameBench的应用程序来确定帧率.
在我们的测试游戏中,OLED面板的全120赫兹通常不被支持。我们还在Armajet中测得60帧,尽管竞技场射击游戏理论上允许144帧。开放世界的动作RPG游戏《元神冲击》在X90 Pro上的渲染速度甚至只有30帧。
排放--vivo智能手机保持冷静
温度
在我们的测量中,表面温度非常低。即使在负载下也几乎没有任何温度发展。然而,在3DMark压力测试中,X90 Pro显示出20%至25%的适度性能损失。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
OnePlus 10T | |
Vivo X90 Pro+ | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Google Pixel 7 Pro | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Vivo X90 Pro+ | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Google Pixel 7 Pro | |
OnePlus 10T |
演讲者
在我们的测试中,立体声扬声器的最大音量达到了92dB(A)以上。声音输出的特点是来自中频的音调,本来可以更线性一点。然而,轻微的低音也是可以识别的。另外,耳机可以通过USB-C端口连接,或通过蓝牙无线连接。
Vivo X90 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi 13 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命 - Vivo X90 Pro,120瓦特
消耗功率
谈到快速充电,vivo智能手机提供有线120瓦和无线50瓦。我们无法验证一个完整的充电过程需要多长时间,因为我们提供的是英国版本的测试。有趣的是,X90 Pro的电池在7.78伏的高电压下运行,导致4,870毫安时(3.89伏)的同等容量。
在我们的测量中,vivo X90 Pro显示出在空闲模式下的耗电量增加。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Vivo X90 Pro 4870 mAh | Xiaomi 13 4500 mAh | Google Pixel 7 Pro 5000 mAh | OnePlus 10T 4800 mAh | Vivo X90 Pro+ 4700 mAh | Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 28% | 19% | 24% | 9% | -13% | -8% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.9 | 0.76 16% | 0.78 13% | 0.8 11% | 0.92 -2% | 0.835 ? 7% | 0.903 ? -0% |
Idle Average * | 2.32 | 1.1 53% | 1.61 31% | 1.2 48% | 1.76 24% | 2 ? 14% | 1.443 ? 38% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.39 | 1.13 53% | 1.63 32% | 1.3 46% | 1.88 21% | 2.06 ? 14% | 1.606 ? 33% |
Load Average * | 3.64 | 2.99 18% | 3.29 10% | 3.5 4% | 3.65 -0% | 6.05 ? -66% | 6.17 ? -70% |
Load Maximum * | 6.53 | 6.63 -2% | 6.01 8% | 5.9 10% | 6.24 4% | 8.79 ? -35% | 9.11 ? -40% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
在我们的WLAN测试中,X90 Pro在调整显示亮度为150cd/m2的情况下持续了15个小时。这是一个很好的比率,只有小米13在这一点上超过了它。 小米13在我们的比较中。
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
Vivo X90 Pro | |
Xiaomi 13 | |
Google Pixel 7 Pro | |
OnePlus 10T | |
Vivo X90 Pro+ |
Pros
Cons
判决书
在没有欧洲官方定价的情况下,对X90 Pro进行结论性的评估是困难的。如果中国制造商在欧洲的旗舰手机与X80 Pro的1299欧元建议零售价相匹配,我们认为有几个理由购买前者而不是X90 Pro--尤其是在许多方面更好的小米13要便宜得多。
X90 Pro是否能作为欧洲的旗舰机与三星Galaxy S23 Ultra或小米13 Pro抗衡,这一点非常值得怀疑。
总的来说,X90 Pro确实是一款不错的智能手机,但与前代产品相比,技术上的退化使它有点降级。为什么继任者是 X80 Pro的继任者不得不接受超广角相机和变焦镜头、指纹传感器和显示屏分辨率的降级,这是令人费解的。特别是考虑到X90 Pro是该制造商的欧洲旗舰,与Pro+型号相比,已经不得不接受在SoC方面的妥协。
如果你真的想从vivo获得最好的东西,你将不得不进口真正的高端智能手机 X90 Pro+.除了 小米13,我们还看到了 谷歌Pixel 7 Pro 作为vivo X90 Pro的一个合适和更便宜的替代品。
价格和可用性
vivo宣布在国际上推出vivo X90 Pro,但目前还不知道关于价格和供应的具体细节。然而,前代产品在中国的建议零售价略低,因此我们假设它在中国的售价也将低于1300欧元。X90 Pro已经可以通过进口购买,例如在深圳贸易公司,起价为,约780欧元。.
Vivo X90 Pro
-
02/21/2023 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.