小米红米12C智能手机评测--速度快，但在某些方面过时了
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 76.6 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Xiaomi Redmi 12C Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 192 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.71" | 1650x720 | |
| 77.3 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2 | 195 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 | |
| 78.9 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Xiaomi Poco M5 Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2 | 201 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.58" | 2408x1080 | |
| 76.6 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Xiaomi Redmi 10C SD 680, Adreno 610 | 190 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.71" | 1650x720 | |
| 79 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Motorola Moto G13 Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 183.5 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 |
外壳和设备 - 过时的USB接口
小米的红米12C是一款廉价的智能手机，根据存储配置的不同，购买价格远低于200欧元（约200美元）。
小米提供四种颜色选择：深灰色、紫色、薄荷绿和蓝色。背部由塑料制成，有 一个可触摸的条纹图案，就像前代产品一样 红米10C.相机模块仍然非常笨重，但它现在在颜色方面已经部分适应了背面，看起来更加谨慎。
外壳的稳定性还可以，但在扭动时可以听到安静的吱吱声。屏幕的边缘也有点尖锐。
在小米的网站上可以找到三种不同的存储配置：
- 3GB内存/32GB大容量存储：150欧元
- 3GB内存/64GB大容量存储：170欧元（约570美元）
- 4GB内存/128GB大容量存储：200欧元
然而，由于促销优惠券，你可以得到更便宜的智能手机，红米12C在互联网的其他地方也有很大的折扣出售。
我们不明白小米怎么能在2023年在红米12C上安装microUSB接口。我们以为混乱的各种端口的时代终于结束了，尤其是即使是 红米10C已经有了一个USB-C端口。
除了2个nano-SIM卡，还可以使用microSD读卡器，尽管在我们的参考卡Angelbird V60的测试中，它不是最快的。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 10C (Angelbird V60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G13 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M5 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 12C (Angelbird V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 软件的更新承诺
红米12C的WiFi 5模块比前代产品做得稍好，但在接收速度方面，它不能完全跟上该价格范围内的其他设备。这主要是由于传输速度的短暂下降，即使重复测试，我们也能在不同点上反复观察到这一点。
小米手机可以使用4G作为最快的移动网络，并配备了中欧地区的必要频率。对于进一步的旅行，你应该提前检查你在所在国需要哪些LTE频段，以及红米12C是否支持。移动网络中的接收质量还不错，但无法跟上高端手机。
该软件被称为MiUI 13，但它仍然是基于Android 12。因此，小米为这款手机做出的2个Android 版本的良好更新承诺只延伸到Android 14。至少安全补丁是定期更新的：每3个月一次；在我们的设备上，安全补丁是从2023年3月开始的，在测试的时候是相当最新的。
指纹传感器被集成到背面的相机模块中。在短暂的等待后，它能相当可靠地解锁智能手机。人脸识别也是可能的，但它是基于软件的，因此不那么安全。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Poco M5 | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 12C | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 10C | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Poco M5 | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 12C | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 10C | |
照相机--价格范围内的标准传感器
与其他众多廉价手机一样，红米12C使用三星的Isocell JN1作为主摄像头的图像传感器。现在的附加摄像头只有10万像素的镜头，但无论如何不能用来制作照片，只能为人像模式提供额外的数据。
主摄像头拍摄的照片部分是模糊的，亮度也有很大的不足。这不仅在白天注意到，而且在黑暗的照明条件和强烈的对比中也注意到。明亮的区域被过度提亮，而黑暗的区域在照片中几乎看不到任何图案。在实验室的全影棚照明下，该相机也有点模糊，但这里的对比度是可以接受的。
自拍相机位于屏幕顶部的水滴状凹槽中。它的分辨率为500万像素。拍出的照片第一眼看上去相当明亮，但它们没有显示出任何画质，特别是在黑暗区域，放大后的细节相当差。
总的来说，红米12C的摄像头与竞争对手持平。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLowLight
显示屏--如果能有更多的亮度和像素就更好了
小米本来有机会在屏幕上脱颖而出：在这个价格范围内，全高清屏幕是绝对有可能的，如 Galaxy A13 4G或 Poco M5，或者非常明亮的屏幕，比如在 摩托G13.
然而，制造商没有这样做，而是安装了一个720p的屏幕，其亮度在我们的测试中甚至低于400cd/m²的平均值。因此，在户外或明亮的房间里，往往很难看到屏幕上的任何东西。
我们没有注意到PWM，但在灰阶中有明显的颜色投射到紫色。总的来说，这块屏幕的色彩准确性还可以。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 417 cd/m²
Contrast: 1191:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.81 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.531
| Xiaomi Redmi 12C IPS, 1650x720, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Xiaomi Poco M5 IPS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Xiaomi Redmi 10C IPS, 1650x720, 6.7" | Motorola Moto G13 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -19% | 19% | 17% | -30% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 49.5 ? | 39 ? 21% | 33 ? 33% | 33 ? 33% | 48.5 ? 2% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 20.9 ? | 33 ? -58% | 20 ? 4% | 21 ? -0% | 33.8 ? -62% |
| PWM Frequency | |||||
| Screen | 7% | 33% | 24% | 11% | |
| Brightness middle | 417 | 492 18% | 400 -4% | 511 23% | 555 33% |
| Brightness | 397 | 453 14% | 396 0% | 478 20% | 553 39% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 87 2% | 96 13% | 84 -1% | 93 9% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.37 -6% | 0.27 23% | 0.42 -20% | 0.29 17% |
| Contrast | 1191 | 1330 12% | 1481 24% | 1217 2% | 1914 61% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.81 | 4.34 -14% | 1.26 67% | 1.51 60% | 5.17 -36% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.2 | 5.94 17% | 2.45 66% | 2.53 65% | 10.61 -47% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 4.7 10% | 1.5 71% | 2.9 44% | 4.5 13% |
| Gamma | 2.531 87% | 2.398 92% | 2.298 96% | 2.266 97% | 2.131 103% |
| CCT | 7842 83% | 7668 85% | 6658 98% | 6443 101% | 7380 88% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -6% /
2% | 26% /
30% | 21% /
23% | -10% /
3% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 49.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 29.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8738 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 性能良好，耐力好
有了 联发科的Helio G85联发科的Helio G85，以前的中端SoC现在也出现在较低价格地区的手机上了。因此，红米12C实际上被证明比红米10C强得多。 红米10C.与其他廉价手机直接相比，小米手机也提供了大量的动力。
在日常使用中，它在大多数应用程序中运行得相当流畅。只有当你想同时运行几个程序或安装非常复杂的应用程序时，你才会遇到性能问题。然而，你不得不忍受缓慢的eMMC闪存，这使得加载时间和数据传输时间有点长。
在重载的情况下，手机在室温下发热到44.7℃。这意味着在炎热的日子里温度可能会增加得更多，变得令人不快。然而，强烈的热量发展并不影响性能：手机在3DMark压力测试中几乎没有显示任何损失。
下部边缘的小扬声器做得很好：即使在最大音量下也不会失真，能很好地再现声音，只是听起来有点闷。当然，你不应该期望有高保真的声音。需要通过3.5毫米插孔或蓝牙连接外部扬声器或耳机，以获得更好的质量。该手机支持许多蓝牙编解码器，包括最新的编解码器，如aptX TWS+或LHDC v3/v4。
5,000毫安时的电池仍然存在，但小米已将充电功率缩短到10瓦，而在 红米10C，18瓦仍然是可能的。运行时间略有改善，现在在我们的Wi-Fi测试中为15:33小时。这款智能手机无法跟上Moto G13 ，但它的运行时间在其价格范围内仍然非常好。
| Xiaomi Redmi 12C | Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | Xiaomi Poco M5 | Xiaomi Redmi 10C | Motorola Moto G13 | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -15% | 188% | 103% | -7% | -25% | 342% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 290.6 | 300.6 3% | 976.4 236% | 927.7 219% | 281.1 -3% | 283 ? -3% | 1847 ? 536% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 225.1 | 230.3 2% | 870.7 287% | 510.2 127% | 244.7 9% | 194.6 ? -14% | 1436 ? 538% |
| Random Read 4KB | 112.9 | 94.5 -16% | 247.6 119% | 120.2 6% | 99.4 -12% | 82.7 ? -27% | 277 ? 145% |
| Random Write 4KB | 123.7 | 61.5 -50% | 257.8 108% | 195.2 58% | 94.9 -23% | 55.1 ? -55% | 308 ? 149% |
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | |
| Xiaomi Poco M5 | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 12C | |
| Xiaomi Poco M5 | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | |
演讲者
Xiaomi Redmi 12C audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Motorola Moto G13 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=204, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 12C | |
| Xiaomi Poco M5 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 10C | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | |
Pros
Cons
评语--小米退步了
小米用红米12C更新了它的经济型手机，但削减了一些角落：红米12C的存储速度较慢，充电时间较长，还有一个microUSB端口（！），红米12C落后于它的前辈，但也落后于同价位的其他智能手机。
小米为什么做出这个决定是个好问题。也许是基于这样一个事实，即购买这个价格区间的智能手机的客户对技术细节不是很感兴趣，几乎不把设备与其他手机进行比较。然而，这是一个耻辱，因为红米10C 是朝着正确的方向迈出的一步，而红米12C看起来是一个明显的退步。
除此以外，屏幕可以更亮，高负荷下的强烈发热也是可以预期的。然而，对于这个价格范围内的设备来说，性能率是合适的，在我们的Wi-Fi测试中，超过15小时的电池运行时间也是令人信服的。这款智能手机还按要求提供了大量的存储空间。
红米12C以相对较低的价格提供了体面的性能率，良好的运行时间和NFC，但也有强大的替代品。
前辈红米10C ，现在可以用很少的钱买到128GB的慷慨存储，例如，在notebooksbilliger.de ，只需不到150欧元。我们也喜欢摩托罗拉Moto G13 ，尽管更新供应不清楚。
价格和可用性
在测试时，红米12C的价格在150至200欧元之间，，直接由制造商提供。取决于内存的配置。这里也不时会有折扣。
然而，红米12C在其他在线零售商的价格要低得多：例如，32GB版本在amazon.de只需不到125欧元。64GB版本的价格只比amazon.de多5欧元。.
128GB版本在以下网站已经有售，价格为137欧元 amazon.de，而我们的贷款人cyberport.de收费略低于160欧元。
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
- 04/15/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
