小米12S Pro评测--配备徕卡相机和强大设备的5G智能手机

Name: Xiaomi 12S Pro
Brand: Xiaomi

与已经发布的小米12S Ultra一样，这家中国制造商的高档智能手机也采用了骁龙8 Plus第一代，UFS 3.1存储，以及LTPO AMOLED面板。此外，小米智能手机还提供120瓦的快速充电。价格约为800欧元（约合803美元），这是一个圆润的包装吗？

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 09/10/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Touchscreen Smartphone

除了其新的小米12S Ultra顶级机型外，小米还在其独家中国活动上推出了其新的高阶12S Pro。与这家中国制造商的旗舰机一样，12S Pro也采用了与徕卡合作开发的主摄像头。除了这个5000万像素的镜头外，上等的小米还提供了另外两个5000万像素的传感器。

除了相机硬件外，小米12S Pro还提供了一些有趣的设备，其强大的骁龙8+第一代和一个大型的6.73英寸1440p AMOLED显示屏，由于采用了LTPO 2.0技术，它的刷新率在1到120赫兹之间。

由于小米12S系列将只在中国销售，小米12S Pro只能从进口商那里购买，起价约为800欧元（约803美元）。

Test device courtesy of tradingshenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi 12S Pro (12 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 730

Memory

8 GB

Display

6.73 inch 20:9, 3200 x 1440 pixel 521 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, OLED, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 224 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro sensor, proximity sensor, compass, color spectrum, OTG, Miracast, IR blaster

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 5G: N1/N3/N5/N8/N28a/N38/N40/N41/N77/N78/N79; 4G: B1 / B2 / B3 / B4 / B5 / B7 / B8 / B12 / B17 / B18 / B19 / B26 / B34 / B38 / B39 / B40 / B41 / B42; 3G; 850/1900/2100MHz; 2G: 850/900/1800/1900MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 163.6 x 74.6

Battery

4800 mAh

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.9, 24 mm, OIS) + 50 MP (f/1.9, 50 mm, telephoto)+ 50 MP (f/2.2, 115˚, ultrawide)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.5, 26 mm)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, charger, case, USB cable, MIUI 13, 12 Months Warranty, fanless, waterproof

Weight

204 g, Power Supply: 219 g

Price

900 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
88 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2022	Xiaomi 12S Pro SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730	204 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.73"	3200x1440
87.6 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2022	Xiaomi 12 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	204 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.73"	3200x1440
87 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2022	OnePlus 10T SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730	203.5 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	2412x1080
88.9 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2022	Samsung Galaxy S22+ Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920	196 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.60"	2340x1080
87.5 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2022	ZTE Axon 40 Ultra SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	204 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.80"	2480x1116

外壳 - 小米智能手机没有IP等级

从视觉上看，小米12S Pro几乎与小米12 Pro在德国有售。箱子的做工符合最高要求，这也是2022年高端智能手机的买家应该能够期待的。

然而，与Ultra机型相比，小米上层智能手机没有提供任何IP认证。我们不知道制造商是否像其他型号一样使用了来自P2i的纳米涂层，使它们能够在雨中毫无问题地生存。至少在SIM卡托盘周围有一个细长的密封圈，它是由塑料制成的。

前面的冲孔确保了纤细的显示屏边框，并使小米智能手机具有近90%的高效显示屏与表面比率。正面和背面都使用了大猩猩Victus玻璃。

尺寸比较

设备 - 带有UFS存储的小米12S Pro

小米12S Pro有四个不同的版本（8GB+128/256GB，12+256 /512GB）。该设备包括红外辐射器、Miracast、蓝牙5.2和NFC，包括谷歌支付，因为有Play Protect认证。

在我们的测试装置中，内部eMMC存储提供了256GB的容量，在交付状态下，用户只剩下约224GB的容量。对于那些存储空间不足的人来说，需要选择更大的存储版本，因为不支持通过microSD卡进行存储扩展。

你可以通过OTG适配器将存储棒等外围设备连接到USB-C端口。该USB端口支持2.0标准的数据传输。

软件--小米智能手机与Android 12

小米12S Pro的操作系统是基于谷歌的12版Android 。在我们测试的时候，安全补丁处于2022年7月的水平。在Android ，制造商安装了其内部的MIUI 13版本。我们无法查到全球的更新保证是否是小米12系列包括三个大型的Android 更新和四年的安全更新，是否也适用于中国独家的高阶机型。

由于小米12S Pro是为中国市场设计的，软件在交付状态下不支持任何谷歌服务，除了中文外，只提供英语作为系统语言。然而，与华为智能手机相比，你可以在以后轻松安装谷歌服务。

通信和GNSS - 小米12S Pro配备5G

小米12S Pro支持接入移动5G网络，总共有18个LTE频段。然而，不幸的是，这些并不包括20和28频段，这对在德国使用它很重要。

在家里的WLAN中，这款高端智能手机提供WiFi 6E。与我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器相结合，这足以满足平均高于900 Mbit/s的传输速率。虽然我们测得的传输率很高，但考虑到全球范围内，我们期望有一个稍高的速度。12 Pro 在这里表现得更好。在我们的测试中，不可能连接到6-GHz的频率范围。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1465 (1307^min - 1536^max) MBit/s +55%
Xiaomi 12S Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	947 (913^min - 949^max) MBit/s
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	934 (768^min - 949^max) MBit/s -1%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	900 (844^min - 951^max) MBit/s -5%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	826 (765^min - 881^max) MBit/s -13%
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=191, last 2 years)	711 MBit/s -25%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1214 (516^min - 1524^max) MBit/s +29%
Xiaomi 12S Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	944 (914^min - 960^max) MBit/s
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	933 (865^min - 958^max) MBit/s -1%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	899 (432^min - 966^max) MBit/s -5%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	831 (428^min - 859^max) MBit/s -12%
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=193, last 2 years)	725 MBit/s -23%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone (229 - 1945, n=80, last 2 years)	1443 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1346 (696^min - 1430^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1565 (777^min - 1666^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (668 - 1864, n=80, last 2 years)	1387 MBit/s

Xiaomi 12S Pro; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø946 (913-949)

Xiaomi 12S Pro; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø944 (914-960)

为了评估上层智能手机在实践中的定位精度，我们用Garmin Venu 2平行记录了一条路线。

类似于 12S Ultra，详细的路线记录显示了一些不准确的地方，这在这个价格级别中有点不寻常，可能是由于中国版本的MIUI 的限制。

电话功能和语音质量--小米双SIM卡的智能手机

小米12S Pro的语音质量处于一个体面的水平。我们无法在设置中找到WiFi通话选项，我们在电信网的SIM卡也不支持LTE语音的选项，这就可以使用4G网进行语音通话。然而，根据制造商的说法，基本上支持双SIM卡与双VoLTE。

照相机 - 小米智能手机配备三摄像头

与小米12 Pro在内置摄像头方面没有区别。12S Pro的主摄像头基于索尼IMX 707，并由一个5千万像素的2倍光学变焦的人像摄像头和一个5千万像素的分辨率超广角摄像头支持。IMX 707加上OIS的画质非常好，照片包含许多细节，色彩鲜艳。另一方面，动态可以变成略高，我们对色彩准确性的分析也显示了几个异常值。

超广角摄像头提供了一个体面的清晰度，虽然与主摄像头相比，清晰度明显下降。即使镜头的弧度被修正得很干净，但细节可以被更好地再现。在变焦方面，小米12S Pro也没有显示其优势。虽然无损的2倍放大相当有说服力，但在更高的变焦水平和数字放大的情况下，50万像素镜头的记录显得相当做作，细节也很差。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main Camera Main Camera Low Light Ultrawide Angle

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

配件和保修 - 小米12S Pro带充电器

盒子里包括一条USB线，一个保护罩，以及一个模块化的120瓦中国充电器。此外，TradingShenzhen还包括一个用于德国使用的插座的欧盟适配器。然而，这并不是标准设备的一部分，而只是供应商的一项特殊服务。

保修期为12个月。通过我们来自TradingShenzhen的测试装置，还可以选择将12S Pro运送到德国地址，以备保修。

输入设备和操作 - 带有FaceUnlock的小米智能手机

振动马达提供了良好的触觉反馈，工作在高质量水平。小米12S Pro的电容式触摸屏可同时识别多达十个触摸点。触摸屏的刷新率（120赫兹）和输入采样率（240赫兹）都明显高于60赫兹的标准，使6.73英寸的OLED面板反应非常灵敏。

显示屏下面是一个光学指纹传感器，可以可靠地识别手指，尽管它不是最快的。该12S Ultra在这里的反应要快得多。通过前置摄像头的人脸识别，可以可靠地解锁这款高档智能手机，尽管这不是很安全（2D）。然而，在MIUI 13中，小米承诺将采用一些机器学习算法，以提高通过前置摄像头进行2D识别的安全性。

显示屏 - 小米12S Pro采用OLED技术

小米12S Pro提供6.73英寸LTPO 2.0 OLED面板，格式为20:9，自适应刷新率高达120赫兹，分辨率为QHD+。在我们的测量中，显示屏亮度处于良好水平，最大为841cd/m²，但三星的竞争对手明显变得更亮，制造商指定的1500尼特的水平也明显错过。虽然在我们的APL18测量中，它至少是952 cd/m²，但这对于令人印象深刻的 HDR体验来说还是太少了。

小米智能手机在121至364赫兹的相当高的频率下使用PWM进行亮度控制。对于OLED面板来说，不典型的是亮度分布不均匀，不到80%。可能，这可能是我们测试装置的显示故障。


698 cd/m²	767 cd/m²	659 cd/m²
695 cd/m²	841 cd/m²	726 cd/m²
759 cd/m²	798 cd/m²	802 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 841 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 749.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 78 %
Center on Battery: 841 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.03 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.234

	Xiaomi 12S Pro OLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"	Xiaomi 12 Pro AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"	OnePlus 10T Fluid AMOLED, 2412x1080, 6.7"	Samsung Galaxy S22+ AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"	ZTE Axon 40 Ultra AMOLED, 2480x1116, 6.8"
Screen		4%	-36%	-21%	-35%
Brightness middle	841	959 14%	861 2%	1090 30%	682 -19%
Brightness	749	977 30%	856 14%	1097 46%	683 -9%
Brightness Distribution	78	96 23%	97 24%	98 26%	94 21%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.03	1.1 -7%	2.27 -120%	2.5 -143%	1.8 -75%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.55	3.1 -22%	4.17 -64%	3.8 -49%	4.7 -84%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.7	1.9 -12%	2.9 -71%	2.3 -35%	2.4 -41%
Gamma	2.234 ^98%	2.22 ^99%	2.303 ^96%	2.04 ^108%	2.16 ^102%
CCT	6425 ^101%	6498 ^100%	6141 ^106%	6492 ^100%	6634 ^98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

364 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 364 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 364 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在不同的亮度设置下，在固定的变焦水平上进行一系列的测量

我们对照片光谱仪和CalMAN软件的分析结果是，对sRGB色彩空间的平均Delta-E偏差相对较低。除了在三种颜色配置文件中进行选择外，您还可以单独调整颜色空间和单独参数。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.7 ms rise
1.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1 ms rise
1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

在户外使用时，小米12S Pro给人留下了良好的印象。虽然阳光直射对这款高档智能手机来说没有问题，但你仍然要避免反射。OLED面板的可视角度非常好，从侧面看，亮度下降也会变低。

性能 - 采用高通SoC的小米智能手机

在日常操作中，强大的骁龙8+第一代确保了非常好的系统速度和流畅的操作。在我们的基准测量中，其数值处于较高水平，甚至常常优于其他品牌的手机。华硕ROG手机6 Pro.与之相反的是一加10T，小米12S Pro在GFX Bench基准的屏幕上的数值没有限制。

像 12S Ultra一样，专业机型显示出非常好的读写率。这款高档智能手机的UFS存储以近2000Mbit/s的速度给人留下深刻印象。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi 12S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1322 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432	1309 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (897 - 1389, n=25)	1281 Points -3%
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	1277 Points -3%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1217 Points -8%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1192 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1133 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)	1037 Points -22%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 12S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	4388 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3782 - 4436, n=25)	4167 Points -5%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432	4162 Points -5%
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	3987 Points -9%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	3738 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	3599 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)	3464 Points -21%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	3289 Points -25%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432	1119358 Points +8%
Xiaomi 12S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1035748 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (782013 - 1119358, n=23)	997431 Points -4%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	962824 Points -7%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	922942 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	850401 Points -18%
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	846323 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone (99654 - 2056989, n=104, last 2 years)	810694 Points -22%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432	17727 Points +28%
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	15944 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (11029 - 20841, n=24)	15090 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	14998 Points +8%
Xiaomi 12S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	13878 Points
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)	13179 Points -5%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	13131 Points -5%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	10745 Points -23%

CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1129 Points +15%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432	1128 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (749 - 1178, n=23)	1033 Points +5%
Xiaomi 12S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	980 Points
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2485, n=164, last 2 years)	920 Points -6%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	811 Points -17%
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	806 Points -18%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	749 Points -24%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432	8406 Points +24%
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	8320 Points +23%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	7665 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (5642 - 8753, n=23)	7450 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	7186 Points +6%
Xiaomi 12S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	6789 Points
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)	6499 Points -4%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	6007 Points -12%
System
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432	12962 Points +13%
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	12230 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (8750 - 13563, n=23)	11726 Points +2%
Xiaomi 12S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	11456 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	11373 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)	10346 Points -10%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	10006 Points -13%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	9873 Points -14%
Memory
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432	9017 Points +47%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	8906 Points +45%
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	8822 Points +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3871 - 9114, n=23)	7492 Points +22%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)	7058 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	6844 Points +12%
Xiaomi 12S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	6124 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	5125 Points -16%
Graphics
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432	26660 Points +42%
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	24037 Points +28%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	21650 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (16194 - 26660, n=23)	21146 Points +13%
Xiaomi 12S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	18784 Points
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)	17998 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	17475 Points -7%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	15216 Points -19%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1960 Points +19%
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	1833 Points +11%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1813 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (1198 - 2006, n=23)	1699 Points +3%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1669 Points +1%
Xiaomi 12S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1654 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432	1602 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)	1578 Points -5%

AImark - Score v2.x
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	72572 Points +889%
Xiaomi 12S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	7335 Points
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	6955 Points -5%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432	6805 Points -7%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	6442 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (1043 - 7865, n=11)	6385 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	6323 Points -14%

3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2876 Points +2%
Xiaomi 12S Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2811 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2513 Points -11%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2188 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1935 Points -31%
Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2824 Points +1%
Xiaomi 12S Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2785 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2609 Points -6%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2528 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2202 Points -21%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 12S Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11076 Points
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10989 Points -1%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10384 Points -6%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9593 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7890 Points -29%
Wild Life Score
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9927 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7710 Points
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps 0%
Xiaomi 12S Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps -2%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	114 fps -6%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -50%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 12S Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	448 fps
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	435 fps -3%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	426 fps -5%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	425 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	320 fps -29%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 12S Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps -2%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	117 fps -3%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -50%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 12S Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	259 fps
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	251 fps -3%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	221 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	214 fps -17%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	193 fps -25%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	114 fps +7%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	111 fps +4%
Xiaomi 12S Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	107 fps
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	87 fps -19%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -44%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	171 fps +40%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	169 fps +39%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	130 fps +7%
Xiaomi 12S Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	122 fps
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	115 fps -6%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 12S Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	86 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	73 fps -15%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	64 fps -26%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -30%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	36 fps -58%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	108 fps +5%
Xiaomi 12S Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	103 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	72 fps -30%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71 fps -31%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	70 fps -32%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 12S Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	64 fps
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54 fps -16%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	52 fps -19%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	27 fps -58%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 12S Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	46 fps
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps -4%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	34 fps -26%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	34 fps -26%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	31 fps -33%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 12S Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	103 fps
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	76 fps -26%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67 fps -35%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -42%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps -57%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	123 fps +3%
Xiaomi 12S Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	92 fps -23%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	80 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -50%

Jetstream 2 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)	130.189 Points +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (76.2 - 204, n=23)	125.2 Points +20%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)	124.4 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Chrome 100.0.4896.127)	107.364 Points +3%
Xiaomi 12S Pro (edge 104)	104.683 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	84.1 Points -20%
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)	81.383 Points -22%

Octane V2 - Total Score
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)	47182 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Chrome 100.0.4896.127)	44398 Points +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (17622 - 61536, n=24)	42193 Points +18%
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)	39982 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)	38550 Points +8%
Xiaomi 12S Pro (edge 104)	35743 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	29750 Points -17%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)	1627.3 ms * -48%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Chrome 100.0.4896.127)	1557.9 ms * -41%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)	1523 ms * -38%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	1330 ms * -21%
Xiaomi 12S Pro (edge 104)	1102.4 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (665 - 1707, n=22)	1023 ms * +7%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)	813.5 ms * +26%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi 12S Pro	Xiaomi 12 Pro	OnePlus 10T	Samsung Galaxy S22+	ZTE Axon 40 Ultra	Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-6%	-41%	-23%	-22%	-19%	-13%
Sequential Read 256KB	1965.43	1620 -18%	1568.37 -20%	1629.99 -17%	1638.15 -17%	1742 ?(950 - 2037, n=102) -11%	1887 ?(226 - 4512, n=198, last 2 years) -4%
Sequential Write 256KB	1447.35	1465 1%	847.69 -41%	1001.67 -31%	1065.13 -26%	1160 ?(452 - 2004, n=102) -20%	1471 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=198, last 2 years) 2%
Random Read 4KB	327.55	324.9 -1%	173.45 -47%	306.7 -6%	313.35 -4%	286 ?(173.5 - 543, n=102) -13%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=198, last 2 years) -15%
Random Write 4KB	465.89	448.9 -4%	211.24 -55%	297.67 -36%	273.19 -41%	319 ?(132.1 - 499, n=103) -32%	311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=198, last 2 years) -33%

排放--小米12S Pro会发热

温度

在小米12S Pro中，外壳明显的热量发展变成了问题。为了评估内部的热量发展，我们使用3DMark基准测试的压力测试。负载情况显示，就像在12 Pro与骁龙8代1一样，为了避免系统过热，在较长的负载阶段后，性能明显下降。

Max. Load

Idle


42.1 °C	40.7 °C	35.9 °C
42.6 °C	41.3 °C	36.6 °C
42.1 °C	41.1 °C	37.2 °C

Maximum: 42.6 °C
Average: 40 °C


34.1 °C	38.8 °C	39.3 °C
35.8 °C	38.9 °C	41.1 °C
35.9 °C	39.3 °C	40.6 °C

Maximum: 41.1 °C
Average: 38.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	92.7 % +73%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59.6 % +11%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58.2 % +9%
Xiaomi 12S Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53.6 %
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47.2 % -12%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 12S Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	75.9 %
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	64.8 % -15%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60.9 % -20%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	% -100%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	% -100%

Xiaomi 12S Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø14.5 (12.7-16.7)

Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø9.11 (8.06-13.3)

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø10.3 (9.26-14.3)

Xiaomi 12S Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø50.7 (34.2-63.8)

Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø37.8 (27.4-58)

OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø61.8 (59-63.6)

Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø31.4 (27.4-47.1)

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø36.8 (31.7-53.3)

Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø49.5 (34.8-61.7)

演讲者

小米12S Pro使用两个扬声器，产生的最大音量为85分贝。我们对小米智能手机的测量显示，中音的频率再现是线性的，超高频的下降也很小。

有线和无线耳机输出也可以通过USB-C和蓝牙5.2进行。音乐迷会对aptX、aptX HD、AAC、LDAC和LHDC等编解码器的广泛支持感到满意。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi 12S Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi 12 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 小米12S Pro，120瓦特

消耗功率

小米的这款高端智能手机支持高达120瓦的有线充电和高达50瓦的无线充电。还支持10瓦特的反向充电。4,800毫安时的电池可以使用附带的充电器快速充电。由于采用了快速充电技术，只需要23分钟就能完全充满电池。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	0.9 / 1.2 / 1.4 Watt
Load	5.5 / 8.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi 12S Pro 4800 mAh	Xiaomi 12 Pro 4600 mAh	OnePlus 10T 4800 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S22+ 4500 mAh	ZTE Axon 40 Ultra 5000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-1%	17%	-2%	-6%	-22%	-14%
Idle Minimum *	0.9	0.94 -4%	0.8 11%	0.71 21%	0.88 2%	1.006 ?(0.56 - 2.57, n=21) -12%	0.883 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=160, last 2 years) 2%
Idle Average *	1.2	1.24 -3%	1.2 -0%	1.1 8%	1.57 -31%	1.834 ?(0.71 - 8.65, n=21) -53%	1.467 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=160, last 2 years) -22%
Idle Maximum *	1.4	1.34 4%	1.3 7%	1.19 15%	1.6 -14%	1.984 ?(0.79 - 8.71, n=21) -42%	1.621 ?(0.83 - 4.46, n=160, last 2 years) -16%
Load Average *	5.5	5.7 -4%	3.5 36%	7.74 -41%	5.06 8%	5.68 ?(2.75 - 15, n=21) -3%	6.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=154, last 2 years) -19%
Load Maximum *	8.5	8.12 4%	5.9 31%	9.64 -13%	7.91 7%	8.44 ?(4.54 - 15, n=21) 1%	9.9 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=154, last 2 years) -16%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi 12S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1: Ø4.21 (0.96-6.24)

OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1: Ø3.88 (0.779-7.97)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi 12S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.23 (6.2-6.34)

OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.67 (7.25-10.7)

Xiaomi 12S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.986 (0.903-1.401)

OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.865 (0.73-1.198)

电池寿命

在我们现实条件下的WLAN测试中，在150cd/m²的显示亮度下，小米智能手机实现了良好的电池寿命。然而，在13.5小时的时间里，它的续航时间竟然比小米手机少了150分钟。 12S Ultra.

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (edge 104)		13h 28min

Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=209, last 2 years)	991 min +23%
Xiaomi 12S Pro 4800 mAh	808 min
Xiaomi 12 Pro 4600 mAh	766 min
OnePlus 10T 4800 mAh	856 min
Samsung Galaxy S22+ 4500 mAh	788 min
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra 5000 mAh	975 min

Pros

+ 明亮的120-Hz LTPO显示屏

+ 强大的SoC

+ 良好的电池寿命

+ 快速充电

Cons

- 没有IP认证

- 只有USB2.0

- 定位的不足之处

- 微薄的超广角摄像头和变焦

对小米12S Pro的评价

小米12S Pro是在德国发售的版本的略微改进版，配备了Snapdragon 8 Gen1.在我们的电池测试中，它凭借更高效的芯片组提供了稍长的电池寿命，并且在类似的节流水平下能够产生更高的整体性能。

其他方面的差异都在细节中。例如，刷新率的自适应控制现在在12S Pro中达到了最低的1赫兹，而不是像12 Pro中的10赫兹。 12专业版.然而，后者提供了一个更好的WLAN速度。

这款高级别的智能手机在冷却方面仍然值得一些批评。尽管在苛刻的压力测试中，它比12 Pro更不容易过热，但其热量的发展却比12 Pro更快。骁龙8+ Gen1的发热情况仍然很明显。而在2022年，为什么一款高级别的智能手机仍要使用USB 2.0，我们无法理解，考虑到这个价格段的强大竞争对手，如三星Galaxy S22 Plus 或中兴通讯Axon 40 Ultra.

小米12S Pro确实是一款不错的智能手机。但与12 Pro的区别是否能弥补中国软件的限制（不支持德语等）和缺乏LTE频段是一个有待解决的问题。

价格和可用性

12S Pro可以从进口商那里买到，如TradingShenzhen，价格约为800美元。他们也提供了我们的测试装置。你还可以选择在这里闪现Xiaomi.eu的固件。

Xiaomi 12S Pro - 09/03/2022 v7 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

89%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 90%

Pointing Device

95%

Connectivity

51 / 70 → 73%

Weight

88%

Battery

90%

Display

93%

Games Performance

72 / 64 → 100%

Application Performance

90 / 86 → 100%

Temperature

89%

Noise

100%

Audio

76 / 90 → 84%

Camera

76%

Average

83%

88%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 535 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 470341 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米12S Pro评测--配备徕卡相机和强大设备的5G智能手机

Marcus Herbrich, 2022-09-10 (Update: 2022-09-10)

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - 小米智能手机没有IP等级

尺寸比较

设备 - 带有UFS存储的小米12S Pro

软件--小米智能手机与Android 12

通信和GNSS - 小米12S Pro配备5G

电话功能和语音质量--小米双SIM卡的智能手机

照相机 - 小米智能手机配备三摄像头

配件和保修 - 小米12S Pro带充电器

输入设备和操作 - 带有FaceUnlock的小米智能手机

显示屏 - 小米12S Pro采用OLED技术

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 采用高通SoC的小米智能手机

排放--小米12S Pro会发热

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

演讲者

Xiaomi 12S Pro audio analysis

Xiaomi 12 Pro audio analysis

电池寿命 - 小米12S Pro，120瓦特

消耗功率

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

对小米12S Pro的评价

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison