Notebookcheck Logo

小米 13T 智能手机评测--小米 13 的预算替代品

更实惠，而且几乎一样好。

如果小米 13 太贵，无法满足您的预算，可以考虑价格更实惠的小米 13T。它同样装备精良，在性能方面可与旗舰机媲美。该机配备 6.67 英寸显示屏，采用亮度极高的 AMOLED 屏幕，刷新率高达 144 Hz，辅以徕卡增强型三摄像头系统，具有 2 倍光学变焦功能。此外，小米 13T 还提供令人印象深刻的 5 年更新支持。
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen
小米 13T

小米 13T 是小米 13T 系列中最经济实惠的入门级机型，定位略低于小米 13 系列。它的售价为 599 美元，与价格更高的同类产品有许多相似之处，提供了丰富的功能。值得注意的功能包括：与徕卡合作开发的 5000 万像素摄像头系统，内置变焦镜头；亮度极高的 AMOLED 显示屏，刷新率高达 144 Hz；以及令人印象深刻的 5 年扩展软件支持。

小米 13T 与小米 13T Pro 之间的主要区别是 小米 13T Pro的主要区别在于系统芯片（SoC）。旗舰产品小米 13T Pro 采用了 联发科 Dimensity 9200+而小米 13T 则采用了 联发科 Dimensity 8200-Ultra，在性能方面略低于旗舰机水平。充电速度也稍显宽松，小米 13T 的最大充电功率为 67 瓦，而小米 13T Pro 的充电功率为 120 瓦。

Xiaomi 13T (13T Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra 8 x 2 - 3.1 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G610 MP6
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2712 x 1220 pixel 446 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 5, 2880Hz PWM-Dimming, 480Hz touch sampling rate, up to 1200 nits in high brightness mode, 2600 nits max brightness, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 256GB, 221.6 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, 360° Ambient light sensor, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Electronic compass, Linear motor, IR blaster, Flicker sensor, Color sensor, eSIM, 2x2 MIMO, Wi‑Fi Direct, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/6/8/19), 4G (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/26/28/32/38/40/41/66), 5G (Band n1/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/66/77/78); Head SAR 0,991 W/kg, Body SAR 0.994 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.49 x 162.2 x 75.7
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Sony IMX707, OIS, AF, f/1.9, 24mm, 1.22µm, 1/1.28") + 50MP telefoto camera (Omnivision OV50D, AF, 2x optical zoom, 20x digital zoom, f/1.9, 50mm, 0.61µm, 1/2.88") + 12MP ultrawide camera (FF, f/2.2, 15mm, 1.12µm, 1/3.06"), videos up to 4K@30fps
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2.2, 0.8µm, 78° FOV, videos up to 1080p@30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speaker with Dolby Atmos support, Keyboard: virtual, 67W charger, USB Type-C cable, SIM eject tool, Protective Case, Quick start guide, warranty card, safety information, MIUI 14, 24 Months Warranty, fanless, waterproof
Weight
197 g, Power Supply: 100 g
Amazon
$449.99
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
87.7 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2023
Xiaomi 13T
Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6		197 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2712x1220
88.9 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2023
Google Pixel 8
Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7		187 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.20"2400x1080
90.5 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy S23
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740		167 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2340x1080
83.1 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2023
Sony Xperia 10 V
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619		159 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.10"2520x1080
88.1 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2023
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11		206 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"2712x1220
86.8 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2023
Xiaomi Poco F5
SD 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725		181 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080

小米 13T 秉承了前代产品的设计语言，采用了窄显示屏边缘、圆角和边缘设计、打孔式自拍摄像头以及无可挑剔的表面处理。这一设计与其姊妹机型小米 13T Pro 保持一致。设备正面由一层大猩猩 5 号玻璃保护，保护着 6.67 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏。虽然屏占比达到了可观的 87%，但与小米 13T Pro（89.2%）和其他一些旗舰智能手机相比略有不足。

作为一款通过 IP68 认证的设备，小米 13T 有三种颜色可供选择。黑色（Black）和绿色（Meadow Green）采用光面玻璃后壳，容易沾染指纹。选择蓝色（阿尔卑斯蓝）版本，后盖则采用人造革材质。这种选择对尺寸和重量的影响微乎其微。采用玻璃后盖的小米手机仅重 0.43 磅。

小米 13T
小米 13T
小米 13T
小米 13T
小米 13T
小米 13T
小米 13T
小米 13T
小米 13T

尺寸比较

❌
162.2 mm 75.7 mm 8.62 mm 206 g162.2 mm 75.7 mm 8.49 mm 197 g161.11 mm 74.95 mm 7.9 mm 181 g155 mm 68 mm 8.3 mm 159 g150.5 mm 70.8 mm 8.9 mm 187 g146.3 mm 70.9 mm 7.6 mm 167 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 最大 256 GB 存储空间

小米 13T 专供单内存版本，配备 8GB LPDDR5 内存和 256GB UFS 3.1 存储空间。该产品功能全面，包括蓝牙 5.4、NFC、支持 OTG 的 USB-C 端口和全开显示屏。此外，该设备还配备了红外发射器，方便用户遥控电视等兼容设备。

值得注意的是，小米 13T 的 USB-C 端口虽然功能丰富，但并不完全符合该智能手机的高端定位，因为其内部工作速度为 USB 2.0。在使用华硕 ROG Strix Arion 机箱中的 M.2 固态硬盘三星 980 Pro 进行的拷贝测试中，USB 端口的传输速率相对较低，仅为 41.4 MB/s。这也是同样采用 USB-C 2.0 接口的小米 13T Pro 的共同特点。

左：无连接
左：无连接
右：电源按钮、音量摇杆
右：电源按钮、音量摇杆
顶部：扬声器、红外爆破器、麦克风
顶部：扬声器、红外爆破器、麦克风
底部双 SIM 卡插槽、麦克风、USB-C 2.0、扬声器
底部双 SIM 卡插槽、麦克风、USB-C 2.0、扬声器

软件 -Android 13 和 5 年软件更新

小米 13T 采用Android 13 操作系统，辅以小米专有的 MIUI 14 用户界面。软件套件包括几个第三方应用程序，如 LinkedIn、Facebook、Snapchat 和 TikTok，所有这些都可以卸载，以便根据个人喜好定制设备。

值得注意的一点是，小米承诺为小米 13T 提供较长的更新时间。与小米 13T Pro 类似，测试候选机承诺 4 次Android 操作系统更新，并将在 5 年内收到Android 安全补丁。这种延长软件支持的做法使小米与三星保持了一致，为购买者提供了更多的计划安全性。

小米 13T
小米 13T
小米 13T
小米 13T
小米 13T
小米 13T
小米 13T
小米 13T

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 精确跟踪

这款智能手机支持 WiFi 6，具有可靠的 Wi-Fi 性能。当连接到我们的参考路由器（华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000）时，智能手机在发送和接收方向上都能达到约 920 MBit/s 的峰值速度。传输表现稳定，仅在数据传输过程中出现轻微掉线。

在移动网络连接方面，小米 13T 支持 5G，但不支持毫米波。它的频率功能覆盖了欧洲 4G 的所有基本频段。这表明，小米 13T 在非欧盟国家也能提供良好的接收效果。

Networking
Xiaomi 13T
iperf3 receive AXE11000
920 (min: 904) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
919 (min: 493) MBit/s ∼53%
Google Pixel 8
iperf3 receive AXE11000
891 (min: 440) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
867 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1570 (min: 1043) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1521 (min: 1325) MBit/s ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy S23
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1659 (min: 1603) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1749 (min: 1253) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1799 (min: 1744) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1590 (min: 1562) MBit/s ∼94%
Sony Xperia 10 V
iperf3 receive AXE11000
347 (min: 332) MBit/s ∼21%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
363 (min: 180) MBit/s ∼21%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
968 (min: 948) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
988 (min: 494) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1857 (min: 934) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1686 (min: 1654) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F5
iperf3 receive AXE11000
686 (min: 509) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
662 (min: 93) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1694 (min: 1558) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1484 (min: 1288) MBit/s ∼88%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1443 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1387 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼82%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1826 (934-1883)
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1683 (1654-1717)
Xiaomi 13T MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, ARM Mali-G610 MP6; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø919 (904-931)
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø966 (948-979)
Xiaomi 13T MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, ARM Mali-G610 MP6; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø903 (493-1010)
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø972 (494-1008)
楼内 GPS 接收
楼内 GPS 接收
户外 GPS 接收
户外 GPS 接收

它利用双频全球导航卫星系统进行精确定位。它支持各种卫星导航服务，包括 GPS（L1、L5）、伽利略（E1、E5a）、Glonass（L1）、北斗（B1、B1c、B2a）和 QZSS（L1、L5）。无论是在室内还是室外，智能手机都能在测试中快速获取定位信号，确定用户的位置，精确度高达 1 米。

在自行车骑行的实际测试中，小米 13T 与 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表进行了对比，展示了其出色的定位能力。结果令人信服，展示了智能手机对路程的精确追踪，使其非常适合日常导航任务。

全球导航卫星系统，摘要
全球导航卫星系统，摘要
全球导航卫星系统，环湖
全球导航卫星系统，环湖
全球导航卫星系统，转折点
全球导航卫星系统，转折点

电话功能和语音质量

该手机提供双卡功能，还可以用 eSIM 卡替代两张 nano SIM 卡中的一张。它支持 VoLTE（LTE 语音）和 Wi-Fi 通话，提供了多种连接选择。

在语音质量方面，小米智能手机表现出色。在与移动和固定电话网络通话时，即使在免提模式下，语音传输也非常清晰。此外，该设备的噪音抑制功能运行可靠，为用户带来了良好的通话体验。

相机 - 带有徕卡触摸功能的三摄像头

使用自拍相机拍摄
使用自拍相机拍摄

与其前代产品相比 小米 12T、小米与徕卡合作，提升了 13T 的摄像头配置。这一升级不仅涉及到与徕卡的合作，还使整个系统更具凝聚力。与小米 12T 一样，小米 13T 后置三摄像头。上一代产品中并不特别实用的 200 万像素微距摄像头被省略了。取而代之的是，小米 13T 现在与小米 13T Pro 共享相同的摄像头设置。

小米 13T 的主摄像头为 5000 万像素索尼 IMX707（f/1.9，24 毫米），配备光学防抖功能，智能手机背面印有徕卡 Vario-Summicron 1:19-2.2/15-50 ASPH 品牌标识。此外，还有一个 1200 万像素的超广角摄像头（Omnivision OV13b，f/2.2，15 毫米），以及一个 5000 万像素的长焦摄像头，具有 2 倍光学变焦和 20 倍数字变焦（Omnivision OV50D，f/1.9，50 毫米）。摄像头阵列由 2000 万像素的打孔自拍摄像头完成，能够拍摄出优质照片，但仅限于以每秒 30 帧的速度录制全高清分辨率的视频。

与 Leica 的合作引入了两种图像模式：Leica Vivid和Leica Authentic，以及众多照片设置选项。这些模式可通过相机应用程序中的单独图标进行访问，每种模式的色彩校准略有不同。此外，还有各种徕卡滤镜可用于增强照片效果。主摄像头可以每秒 30 帧的速度录制高达 4K 的视频。

在日光条件下，主摄像头可以拍摄出图像噪点极少的出色照片，并借助光学防抖功能持续保持清晰度。徕卡鲜艳模式可产生强烈的对比度，而徕卡真实模式则倾向于提供柔和的对比度。主摄像头在拍摄夜景时也表现出色。不过，与采用相同拍照硬件的小米 13T Pro 相比，细节水平略低，照片的动态效果也较差。这种差异可能归因于不同的 SoC（小米 13T Pro：联发科 Dimensity 9200+）： 联发科 Dimensity 9200+

，长焦摄像头同样拥有 5000 万像素的分辨率，在无损变焦高达 2 倍的情况下也能拍出高对比度的清晰照片，整体表现值得称赞。使用数码变焦时，图像会迅速变得模糊。小米 13T 相机组合中最薄弱的环节是 1200 万像素超广角摄像头。虽然它的表现足够出色，但它并不能提供超出标准的照片质量，只能与价格更低的智能手机相媲美。

使用主摄像头拍摄
使用主摄像头拍摄
使用主摄像头拍摄
使用主摄像头拍摄
使用主摄像头拍摄
使用主摄像头拍摄

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Aufnahme 1Tageslicht-Aufnahme 2Ultraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLowlight-Aufnahme
orginal image
click to load images

在受控照明条件下，主相机的成像性能值得称赞。Delta-E 色彩偏差高达 21.23，比较明显。特别是，绿色色调偶尔会比 ColorChecker 色彩表中的参考色亮得多。尽管只有 1 勒克斯的残余光，小米 13T 仍能显示测试图表，尽管有明显的模糊。

ColorChecker
11.6 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
12 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
4 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
13 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 13T: 9.99 ∆E min: 2.55 - max: 21.23 ∆E
ColorChecker
24 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
26.6 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
40 ∆E
40.6 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
28.1 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
26.1 ∆E
25.2 ∆E
27.9 ∆E
36 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 13T: 25.47 ∆E min: 12.31 - max: 40.56 ∆E

配件和保修 - 无 24 个月高级支持

附带的 67 瓦电源。
附带的 67 瓦电源。

小米 13T 随附 67 瓦电源适配器（5-20V/6.2-3.25A）、USB-C 数据线、透明保护盖、SIM 卡工具和快速入门指南。

，遗憾的是，美国不提供保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - 144 Hz 快速反应显示屏

小米 13T 的刷新率高达 144 Hz，并可根据内容动态调整采样率，最高可达 480 Hz，可提供异常流畅的内容显示。该设备在输入和响应之间没有明显的延迟，即使同时打开多个应用程序，也能确保快速切换应用程序。

通过集成在显示屏中的光学指纹识别器实现生物识别身份验证，性能快速可靠。此外，二维面部识别也可用于身份验证，提供了一种快速但不太安全的替代方法。

键盘横向模式
键盘横向模式
键盘纵向模式
键盘纵向模式

显示屏 - 极亮的 AMOLED 面板

子像素
子像素

小米 13T 配备 6.67 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏，分辨率为 2712 x 1220 像素，屏幕纵横比为 20:9，像素密度高达 446 PPI。该面板支持 HDR10、HDR10+ 和杜比视界（Dolby Vision）。

显示屏的刷新率最高可达 144 Hz，可分 5 级动态调节。当Android 设置为 60 Hz 时，屏幕会根据显示内容以 30 或 60 Hz 运行。

小米宣称其典型亮度为 1200 cd/m²，峰值可达 2600 cd/m²。在亮暗图像区域均匀分布的测量中（APL18），AMOLED 显示屏达到了令人印象深刻的 1452 cd/m²，使其成为目前最亮的智能手机显示屏之一。

显示屏使用脉宽调制（PWM）控制屏幕亮度，这表明屏幕闪烁不可避免。在整个亮度范围内，振幅曲线始终保持在 120 Hz。小米表示，13T 采用了频率高达 2880 Hz 的 PWM 调光，为敏感用户提供了更舒适的体验。

1197
cd/m²		1269
cd/m²		1276
cd/m²
1270
cd/m²		1254
cd/m²		1274
cd/m²
1253
cd/m²		1181
cd/m²		1273
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1276 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1249.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.51 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 1254 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21
Xiaomi 13T
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"		Google Pixel 8
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.2"		Samsung Galaxy S23
Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 2340x1080, 6.1"		Sony Xperia 10 V
OLED, 2520x1080, 6.1"		Xiaomi 13T Pro
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"		Xiaomi Poco F5
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen
-39%
-113%
-21%
-41%
-69%
Brightness middle
1254
1450
16%
1125
-10%
933
-26%
1252
0%
1034
-18%
Brightness
1250
1410
13%
1122
-10%
944
-24%
1230
-2%
1033
-17%
Brightness Distribution
93
92
-1%
96
3%
97
4%
96
3%
93
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.8
1.1
-38%
3.2
-300%
1.1
-38%
1.4
-75%
1.9
-138%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.6
4.2
-163%
4.9
-206%
1.7
-6%
3.1
-94%
3.7
-131%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.3
2.1
-62%
3.3
-154%
1.8
-38%
2.3
-77%
2.7
-108%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.24 98%
1.97 112%
2.29 96%
2.23 99%
2.24 98%
CCT
6350 102%
6584 99%
6504 100%
6611 98%
6590 99%
6917 94%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

小米 13T 的 AMOLED 显示屏在出厂时经过了精细校准。从默认的 "鲜艳"色彩方案过渡到 "原色 "（第三个选项是 "饱和"），可确保色彩和灰度在最佳范围内。对于喜欢鲜艳和饱和色彩模式的用户，还可以通过选择所需的色温来自定义色彩显示。

色彩保真度（色彩方案原色、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩保真度（色彩方案原色、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩保真度（色彩方案原色、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩保真度（色彩方案原色、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（色彩方案原色，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（色彩方案原色，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（色彩方案原色，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（色彩方案原色，目标色彩空间 sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.571 ms rise
↘ 0.527 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6 ms rise
↘ 0.6655 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

AMOLED 显示屏以其稳定的视角著称，在室外的表现尤为出色。其高亮度储备即使在阳光直射下也能轻松阅读内容。此外，还提供阳光模式，可根据强烈的环境光线调节亮度，进一步提高可视性。

室外使用（阳光直射）
室外使用（阳光直射）
室外使用（阳光直射）
室外使用（阳光直射）
室外使用（阴凉处）
室外使用（阴凉处）
视角稳定性
视角稳定性

性能 - 几乎达到旗舰水平

联发科 联发科 Dimensity 8200-Ultra是联发科 Dimensity 8200-Ultra 的变体，它是专为小米设计的先进 CPU，具有增强的相机 ISP 功能。 联发科 Dimensity 8200也是小米 13T 所使用的处理器。

联发科 Dimensity 8200-Ultra 采用 4 纳米工艺制造，拥有八个内核，分为两个集群。第一个集群包括一个主频为 3.1 GHz 的 ARM Cortex-A78 性能内核，以及另外三个主频为 3 GHz 的 ARM Cortex-A78 性能内核。第二个集群包含四个主频为 2.0 GHz 的 ARM Cortex-A55 电源内核。

虽然小米 13T 的 SoC 性能可能无法与其姊妹机型--小米 13T Pro 相提并论。 小米 13T Pro相比，它的合成基准测试结果仍然值得称赞。联发科 Dimensity 8200-Ultra 的性能表现与 高通骁龙 7+ 第二代处理器和高通骁龙 7+ Gen 2 小米 Poco F5.谷歌 谷歌张量 G3中的 谷歌 Pixel 8 也达到了相当的性能水平。

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.3 | Antutu v9 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1549 Points +52%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1502 Points +48%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1260 Points +24%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
1225 Points +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)
1037 Points +2%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
1018 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
  (1012 - 1018, n=2)
1015 Points 0%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
669 Points -34%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
4974 Points +30%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
4793 Points +25%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
3948 Points +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
  (3833 - 3914, n=2)
3874 Points +1%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
3833 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)
3464 Points -10%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
3395 Points -11%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1921 Points -50%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1984 Points +58%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
1687 Points +35%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1653 Points +32%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1491 Points +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=171, last 2 years)
1491 Points +19%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
1252 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
  (981 - 1252, n=2)
1117 Points -11%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
904 Points -28%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
5149 Points +28%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
4378 Points +9%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
4225 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=171, last 2 years)
4177 Points +4%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
4034 Points
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
3787 Points -6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
  (3295 - 4034, n=2)
3665 Points -9%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2111 Points -48%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1478071 Points +64%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1134684 Points +26%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
1115567 Points +24%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
903102 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
  ()
903102 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=104, last 2 years)
810694 Points -10%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
603046 Points -33%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
391186 Points -57%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1508318 Points +59%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=106, last 2 years)
1307393 Points +38%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1107295 Points +17%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
  (947949 - 960442, n=2)
954196 Points +1%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
947949 Points
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
15270 Points +9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
  (13966 - 14880, n=2)
14423 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
14143 Points +1%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
13966 Points
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
13573 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13179 Points -6%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
10897 Points -22%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7933 Points -43%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1221 Points +40%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
955 Points +10%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
941 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=164, last 2 years)
920 Points +6%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
872 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
  (784 - 872, n=2)
828 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
817 Points -6%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
597 Points -32%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
8893 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
8830 Points +48%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
6974 Points +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)
6499 Points +9%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
5971 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
  (5164 - 5971, n=2)
5568 Points -7%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
5089 Points -15%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3655 Points -39%
System
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
14401 Points +23%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
13985 Points +19%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
11727 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)
10346 Points -12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
  (8407 - 11727, n=2)
10067 Points -14%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
8251 Points -30%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7953 Points -32%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
7446 Points -37%
Memory
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
9598 Points +52%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
9115 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
8871 Points +41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)
7058 Points +12%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
6298 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
  (4837 - 6298, n=2)
5568 Points -12%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
4374 Points -31%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4146 Points -34%
Graphics
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
26849 Points +142%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
26748 Points +141%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
18975 Points +71%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)
17998 Points +62%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
15847 Points +43%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
  (11101 - 11895, n=2)
11498 Points +4%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
11101 Points
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4376 Points -61%
Web
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1785 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1779 Points +15%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1657 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)
1578 Points +2%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
1550 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
  (1470 - 1550, n=2)
1510 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
1384 Points -11%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1237 Points -20%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
44231 Points +68%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
  (26303 - 28292, n=2)
27298 Points +4%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
26303 Points
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
25563 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17814 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
16702 Points -37%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
10511 Points -60%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
5442 Points -79%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
25319 Points +14%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
  (22237 - 24591, n=2)
23414 Points +5%
Xiaomi 13T
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
22237 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1320 Points -94%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
1189 Points -95%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1136 Points -95%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
445 Points -98%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
Points -100%

在图形计算方面，小米 13T 采用了 ARM GPU Mali-G610 MP6，为智能手机提供了可观的图形性能。尽管如此，小米 13T 在同类产品中并不占优势。虽然小米 13T 的性能超过了索尼 Xperia 10 V，但还达不到小米 Poco F5 和谷歌 Pixel 8 的性能水平。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3699 Points +119%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3011 Points +78%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2439 Points +44%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1968 Points +16%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1690 Points
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
353 Points -79%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3857 Points +124%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3067 Points +78%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2422 Points +40%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1984 Points +15%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1725 Points
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
358 Points -79%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13911 Points +116%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11678 Points +81%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8977 Points +39%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7701 Points +20%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6439 Points
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1198 Points -81%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8635 Points +33%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7684 Points +19%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6480 Points
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1206 Points -81%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6185 Points +2%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6043 Points
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4995 Points -17%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4985 Points -18%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3982 Points -34%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3512 Points -42%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21767 Points +116%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19231 Points +91%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14801 Points +47%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13546 Points +35%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10067 Points
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2990 Points -70%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13955 Points +59%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10301 Points +17%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10274 Points +17%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9813 Points +12%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8769 Points
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3092 Points -65%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
59 fps -51%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
504 fps +92%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
459 fps +75%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
359 fps +37%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
317 fps +21%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
262 fps
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
93 fps -65%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +15%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +15%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +14%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
104 fps
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78 fps -25%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
39 fps -62%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
299 fps +90%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
271 fps +73%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
232 fps +48%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
157 fps
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97 fps -38%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps -70%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +71%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +71%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps +64%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
70 fps
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps -7%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps -63%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
193 fps +93%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
186 fps +86%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
137 fps +37%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
100 fps
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92 fps -8%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -66%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps +187%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps +113%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps +79%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps +53%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -58%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
123 fps +141%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
103 fps +102%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps +55%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps +45%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +227%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps +130%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps +87%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps +63%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps -63%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps +163%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58 fps +142%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps +54%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps +42%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.1 fps -66%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +161%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps +76%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78 fps +70%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps +63%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
141 fps +124%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
136 fps +116%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 fps +57%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps -44%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps -65%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps +173%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
27 fps +145%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps +45%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps +45%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11 fps
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps -67%

浏览器基准测试显示，小米 13T 的性能令人印象深刻，在所选对比设备中处于中等水平。这款智能手机的网页加载速度很快，显示性能反应灵敏。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
158.595 Points +65%
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)
136.736 Points +42%
Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116)
126.392 Points +31%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points +29%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
104.25 Points +8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra (96.2 - 103, n=2)
99.6 Points +4%
Xiaomi 13T (Chrome 119.0.6045.163)
96.176 Points
Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116)
78.167 Points -19%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)
176 runs/min +57%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min +28%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
136 runs/min +21%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
136 runs/min +21%
Xiaomi 13T (Chrome 119.0.6045.163)
112 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra (112 - 112, n=2)
112 runs/min 0%
Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116)
108 runs/min -4%
Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116)
72 runs/min -36%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
146 Points +36%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points +9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra (107 - 109, n=2)
108 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116)
107 Points 0%
Xiaomi 13T (Chrome 119.0.6045.163)
107 Points
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)
95 Points -11%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
94 Points -12%
Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116)
67 Points -37%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
150.2 Points +22%
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)
143 Points +16%
Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116)
134 Points +9%
Xiaomi 13T (Chrome 119.0.6045.163)
123 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra (122 - 123, n=2)
122.5 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
115 Points -7%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
59913 Points +42%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
47776 Points +13%
Xiaomi 13T (Chrome 119.0.6045.163)
42222 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra (35231 - 42222, n=2)
38727 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points -9%
Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116)
37823 Points -10%
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)
36482 Points -14%
Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116)
28902 Points -32%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * -24%
Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116)
1388 ms * -13%
Xiaomi 13T (Chrome 119.0.6045.163)
1232.9 ms *
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra (1222 - 1233, n=2)
1227 ms * -0%
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)
1143.43 ms * +7%
Xiaomi Poco F5 (Chrome 116)
1021.2 ms * +17%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
998 ms * +19%
Samsung Galaxy S23 (Chrome 109)
701.7 ms * +43%

* ... smaller is better

得益于 UFS 3.1 闪存，小米 13T 的存储速度令人印象深刻，从而缩短了加载时间。值得注意的是，在读写小数据块时，它的性能接近小米 13T Pro。

Xiaomi 13TSamsung Galaxy S23Sony Xperia 10 VXiaomi 13T ProXiaomi Poco F5Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-24%
-67%
60%
2%
-24%
-19%
Sequential Read 256KB
1861.15
3133.7 ?(UFS 4.0)
68%

1686.71 ?(UFS 3.1)
-9%

444.54
-76%
3983.36
114%
1798.37
-3%
1742 ?(950 - 2037, n=102)
-6%
1887 ?(226 - 4512, n=198, last 2 years)
1%
Sequential Write 256KB
1766.12
844 ?(UFS 4.0)
-52%

628.53 ?(UFS 3.1)
-64%

438.02
-75%
3201.74
81%
1736.41
-2%
1160 ?(452 - 2004, n=102)
-34%
1471 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=198, last 2 years)
-17%
Random Read 4KB
380.76
427.61 ?(UFS 4.0)
12%

343.65 ?(UFS 3.1)
-10%

175.72
-54%
434.21
14%
389.37
2%
286 ?(173.5 - 543, n=102)
-25%
278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=198, last 2 years)
-27%
Random Write 4KB
452.08
156.69 ?(UFS 4.0)
-65%

130.26 ?(UFS 3.1)
-71%

165.15
-63%
583.6
29%
498.93
10%
319 ?(132.1 - 499, n=103)
-29%
311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=198, last 2 years)
-31%

游戏 - 功能强大的游戏平台

采用 ARM Mali-G610 MP6 和 8GB LPDDR5 内存，小米 13T 处理游戏时受到的限制极少。测试过程中观察到的主要限制来自游戏本身。

在《PUBG Mobile》（HD/Extrem）和《Asphalt 9》（高 设置）等游戏中，图像输出上限为 60 FPS，这可能是出于节能目的。然而，小米 13T 在这两种情况下都能将帧速率保持在几乎恒定的 60 FPS，这表明它可以实现更高的性能。

即使在《PUBG Mobile》的UltraHDR/Ultra 设置下，小米 13T 也能保持 40 FPS 的平均帧率。值得注意的是，在第三个测试游戏《地铁冲浪》中，由于没有帧数限制，智能手机充分发挥了 120 Hz 屏幕的性能。

游戏帧率的测定是通过我们的Gamebench测试工具进行。

沥青 9
沥青 9
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Xiaomi 13T; Asphalt 9: Legends; 4.3.3a: Ø59.4 (51-61)
Xiaomi 13T; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.9.0: Ø59.3 (57-61)
Xiaomi 13T; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 2.9.0: Ø39.9 (38-41)
Xiaomi 13T; Subway Surfers; 3.20.0: Ø118.4 (111-121)

排放 - 几乎总能达到最高性能

温度

在测试过程中，小米 13T 在负载情况下的温度达到 107.42 °F。

在 3DMark 的 Wild Life 压力测试中，小米 13T 表现出了高效的散热能力。在运行 20 次之后，即使在要求苛刻的 "狂野生活极限 "场景下，测试场景的渲染速度也仅比测量开始时慢 10%左右。这表明，智能手机在持续高负载的情况下至少可以保持 90% 的性能。

Max. Load
 40.9 °C41.6 °C40.9 °C 
 41.8 °C41.9 °C41.2 °C 
 41.8 °C41.9 °C41.2 °C 
Maximum: 41.9 °C
Average: 41.5 °C
35.9 °C38.8 °C37.7 °C
36.2 °C38.2 °C40.2 °C
37.3 °C39.1 °C40.7 °C
Maximum: 40.7 °C
Average: 38.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  27.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.1 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.6 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.7 % +9%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
91.4 %
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85.8 % -6%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83.4 % -9%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
74.2 % -19%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68.6 % -25%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Poco F5
Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.7 % +11%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.2 % +10%
Xiaomi 13T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90.2 %
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 % -12%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76.7 % -15%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53.8 % -40%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
86.3 %
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Xiaomi 13T Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø9.63 (9.32-10.3)
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.7 (11.3-14.4)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø15.5 (12.4-23.1)
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø17.8 (16.9-22)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø11.7 (11.7-11.8)
Xiaomi 13T Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8200-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø35.9 (35.4-38.7)
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø46.6 (43.2-51.8)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø58.5 (52.3-76.3)
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 1.1.4.1: Ø7.21 (7.2-7.22)
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø57 (48.3-65.1)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø40.9 (39.1-45.6)
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.9 (43.5-53.7)
Google Pixel 8 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.9 (43.5-53.7)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø66.7 (56-85.8)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Adreno 725, SD 7+ Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø44.7 (39.7-46.1)
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø17.1 (16.8-19.4)
小米 13T
小米 13T

发言人

小米 13T 的立体声扬声器位于外壳的两个短边，按照智能手机的标准，它能提供相对均衡的音效。

可通过 USB-C 或蓝牙 5.4 连接外部音频设备。小米 13T 支持所有重要的蓝牙编解码器，包括 AAC、SBC、LDAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、aptX TWS+ 和 LHDC V1 至 V5。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.938.22529.630.63123.736.54035.631.75038.637.96324.236.38018.938.710018.942.412515.741.516013.950.320014.752.925015.257.831512.963.640011.463.350012.768.163012.268.680011.573.5100011.677.5125013.678.5160012.876.720001379.8250012.780.3315012.780.4400012.983.8500013.482.1630013.480.2800013.977.71000013.672.41250013.671.11600013.765.5SPL25.191.4N0.687.2median 13.4median 73.5Delta0.78.839.435.732.532.120.830.527.325.934.433.824.633.62031.320.129.816.133.517.545.11547.716.358.213.3591460.212.765.813.869.513.671.413.173.613.776.812.874.613.577.213.978.61380.313.482.613.678.213.778.613.478.413.575.113.965.913.360.525.689.70.779.6median 13.6median 73.60.79.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi 13TXiaomi 13T Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi 13T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi 13T Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 67 瓦快速充电

耗电量

这款智能手机的充电功率高达 67 瓦，其 5000 毫安时电池的正式充电时间为 42 分钟。在测试过程中，秒表甚至停在了 41 分钟。手机随附一个合适的 67 瓦电源适配器，非常方便。小米 13T 不支持无线充电和反向无线充电。

在功耗方面，小米 13T 在测试中几乎完全不起眼。13.2 瓦的高负载功耗是由于要求极高的燃尽基准测试所致。小米 小米 Poco F5和 小米 13T Pro的功耗甚至略高。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.05 / 0.24 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.13 / 1.37 / 1.42 Watt
Load midlight 8.98 / 13.23 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi 13T
5000 mAh		Google Pixel 8
4575 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S23
3900 mAh		Sony Xperia 10 V
5000 mAh		Xiaomi 13T Pro
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Poco F5
5000 mAh		Average MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
27%
49%
43%
1%
9%
3%
11%
Idle Minimum *
1.13
0.56
50%
0.57
50%
0.56
50%
0.99
12%
0.89
21%
1.025 ?(0.92 - 1.13, n=2)
9%
0.88 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=158, last 2 years)
22%
Idle Average *
1.37
1.08
21%
0.74
46%
0.91
34%
1.14
17%
1.05
23%
1.405 ?(1.37 - 1.44, n=2)
-3%
1.444 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=158, last 2 years)
-5%
Idle Maximum *
1.42
1.17
18%
0.83
42%
0.98
31%
1.34
6%
1.08
24%
1.48 ?(1.42 - 1.54, n=2)
-4%
1.6 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=158, last 2 years)
-13%
Load Average *
8.98
8.01
11%
4.26
53%
5.34
41%
10.06
-12%
10.86
-21%
8.54 ?(8.09 - 8.98, n=2)
5%
6.57 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=153, last 2 years)
27%
Load Maximum *
13.23
8.89
33%
6.16
53%
5.46
59%
15.94
-20%
13.49
-2%
12.2 ?(11.2 - 13.2, n=2)
8%
9.91 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=153, last 2 years)
25%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Xiaomi 13T MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.46 (1.205-10.9)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.19 (0.819-14)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.57 (0.819-10.1)
Xiaomi 13T MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.997 (0.937-1.285)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.699 (0.602-1.197)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.824 (0.707-0.916)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213Tooltip
Xiaomi 13T MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.65 (4.67-7.07)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.8 (10.5-13)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.27 (5.86-6.72)
Xiaomi 13T MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.997 (0.937-1.285)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.699 (0.602-1.197)
Xiaomi Poco F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.824 (0.707-0.916)

电池寿命

我们将屏幕亮度调节到 150 cd/m²，对电池续航时间进行了实际测量。在启用 144 Hz 显示屏时，小米 13T 表现出色。在 WLAN 测试中，它的续航时间略高于 17 小时，在连续播放视频时略多于 15 分钟。对比设备的续航时间与小米 13T 相近，除了 索尼 Xperia 10 V除外，它表现出了真正的耐用品质。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
41h 51min
WiFi Websurfing
17h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 20min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 07min
Xiaomi 13T
5000 mAh		Google Pixel 8
4575 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S23
3900 mAh		Sony Xperia 10 V
5000 mAh		Xiaomi 13T Pro
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Poco F5
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-12%
13%
47%
19%
-0%
Reader / Idle
2511
1493
-41%
2249
-10%
4067
62%
1798
-28%
1324
-47%
H.264
1040
1363
31%
1255
21%
1615
55%
1298
25%
1123
8%
WiFi v1.3
1026
814
-21%
926
-10%
1157
13%
1099
7%
1014
-1%
Load
247
205
-17%
370
50%
388
57%
427
73%
343
39%

Pros

+ 高品质防水外壳
+ 144 Hz 超亮 AMOLED 显示屏
+ 良好的摄像系统
+ 高性能
+ 延长更新时间
+ 67 瓦快速充电

Cons

- 仅限 USB-C 2.0
- 无无线充电功能
- 只有一种内存，不可扩展

小米 13T 的评价

小米 13T 评测。测试设备由
小米 13T 评测。测试设备由

一直等到现在才购买新智能手机的人可能会在小米手机系列中找到最合适的产品。临近年底发布的 T 系列一直以相对合理的价格提供性能和功能令人印象深刻的机型。小米 13T 的官方售价为 599 美元，虽然不是一款经济实惠的选择，但比目前的小米旗舰机型要实惠得多。

小米 13T 是一款性能出色、功能丰富的高端智能手机，目前售价不到 600 美元。

采用 联发科 Dimensity 8200-Ultra处理器，性能略低于旗舰机型，使其有别于 小米 13T Pro和小米 13T Pro 的区别。小米 13T 的充电功率为 67 瓦，虽然没有无线充电功能，但只需 41 分钟就能充满电。

小米 13T 的各种系统组件都令人印象深刻，尤其是其非常明亮的 AMOLED 显示屏。在同价位产品中，值得一提的还有相机模块，包括一个 2 倍长焦镜头。延长 5 年的更新周期可能会动摇那些对选择小米犹豫不决的用户。

不过，对存储空间有较高需求的用户可能会失望，因为小米 13T 仅提供 256 GB 版本，无法使用 microSD 卡扩展存储空间。在这方面，容量高达 1 TB 的小米 13T Pro 提供了更好的解决方案。

其他可考虑的选择包括 三星Galaxy S23和 小米 Poco F5.前者的速度略胜一筹，6.1 英寸的尺寸也更为小巧。虽然小米 Poco F5 更符合预算要求，但与小米 13T 相比，它在相机方面有所欠缺。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

小米 13T 在亚马逊上的售价低于 500 美元。

Xiaomi 13T - 12/07/2023 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
87%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
51 / 70 → 73%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
94%
Games Performance
61 / 64 → 95%
Application Performance
86 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
79 / 90 → 88%
Camera
76%
Average
82%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米 13T 智能手机评测--小米 13 的预算替代品
Manuel Masiero, 2023-12- 8 (Update: 2024-08-15)