Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar申克威盛 14 Pro (M24) 评测--配备 Ryzen 8000 和更亮显示屏的紧凑型 AMD 超小型笔记本电脑
申克公司更新了其紧凑型 AMD 子笔记本威盛 14 Pro，与旧型号相比（我们测试的是 Linux 版本--"Tuxo Pulse 14 Pro"），威盛 14 Pro 的性能更胜一筹。 Tuxedo Pulse 14我们测试的是 Linux 版本--Tuxedo Pulse 14），它采用了新的处理器、更亮的显示屏和新的外壳涂层，应该不易沾染灰尘。
申克威盛 14 Pro（M24）的基本售价为 1099 欧元，保修三年（不含操作系统）。为此，它标配了 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS32 GB 内存、500 GB 固态硬盘和哑光 2.8K IPS 面板。我们的测试配置是 2 TB 版本的三星 990 Pro，并预装了 Windows 系统，因此价格提升至 1275 欧元。
在本文中，我们将重点介绍与旧机型的区别、更亮的显示屏，当然还有性能和对排放的影响。关于机箱、功能和输入设备的全面信息，请参阅我们对 Tuxedo Pulse 14.
VIA 14 Pro (M24) Performance 54W
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS 8 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, 54 W PL2 / Short Burst, 54 W PL1 / Sustained, Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon 780M, Core: 2700 MHz, RAM: 1067 MHz, Adrenalin 24.5.1
Memory
32 GB
, LPDDR5x-6400, Dual-Channel. onboard
Display
14.00 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 243 PPI, TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, glossy: no, 120 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB, 2048 GB
, 1802 GB free
Weight
1.4 kg, Power Supply: 260 g
Price
1275 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85.1 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 1.4 kg | 18.5 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 83.5 % | v8 | 06 / 2024 | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.3 kg | 17.08 mm | 14.20" | 2880x1920 | |
| 85.5 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 88.6 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M | 1.2 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 88.1 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 89 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 01 / 2024 | Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | 1.4 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
注：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息请点击 这里.
与前身的区别
基本上，外壳没有任何变化。我们在测试 Tuxedo Pulse 14的表面非常敏感，很快就会留下指纹和污垢，而且清洁起来也不容易。为了解决这个问题，现在采用了一种新的涂层来减少指纹。效果也略有改善，但指纹还是比较好，你必须经常清洁机壳。我们还是希望能增加银色版本。
我们注意到 Tuxedo Pulse 14 上网络摄像头的绿色 LED 状态指示灯，这也导致照片中出现轻微的绿色光泽。另一方面，Via 14 Pro 使用的是白色 LED，在照片中也不明显。不过，720p 网络摄像头的图像质量总体上仍然较差。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Networking | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1257 (1208-1302)
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1625 (1557-1675)
20.3 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
15 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
12 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
显示屏 - IPS 面板现在更亮了
威盛 14 Pro 仍采用哑光 IPS 面板，分辨率为 2,880 x 1,800 像素，格式为 16:10，频率为 120 Hz。它的面板 ID 与 Tuxedo Pulse 14 相同，但亮度有所提高。申克公司规定的亮度为 400 cd/m²，但我们的测试设备明显超过了这一标准，平均亮度达到 467 cd/m²。这也使它比 Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 亮度高出 100 cd/m²。黑阶为 0.29 cd/m²，对比度约为 1,600:1。
该面板给人的主观图像印象整体尚可，明亮区域仍略显颗粒感，也有轻微的光晕。没有使用 PWM，响应时间不明显，但不是特别快。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
TL140ADXP24-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 483 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 467.2 cd/m² Minimum: 16.2 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 466 cd/m²
Contrast: 1607:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.3
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
72.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T EDO0142, OLED, 2880x1920, 14.2" | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA ATNA40CT02-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 2% | 1% | 21% | 27% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 70.1 | 72.42 3% | 70.3 0% | 98.6 41% | 99.9 43% | 71.1 1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 97.7 | 99.79 2% | 99.7 2% | 99.9 2% | 100 2% | 98.7 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.3 | 73.94 2% | 72.1 0% | 87.3 21% | 98.9 37% | 73.2 1% |
| Response Times | 24% | 3% | 95% | 97% | -29% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 31.1 ? | 7 ? 77% | 32.7 ? -5% | 1.31 ? 96% | 0.61 ? 98% | 37.9 ? -22% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 17.1 ? | 22 ? -29% | 15.2 ? 11% | 1.2 ? 93% | 0.67 ? 96% | 23.1 ? -35% |
| PWM Frequency | 238 ? | 480 ? | 240 ? | |||
| Screen | 181% | 13% | 320% | -5% | 14% | |
| Brightness middle | 466 | 373 -20% | 418 -10% | 387 -17% | 411 -12% | 340 -27% |
| Brightness | 467 | 377 -19% | 408 -13% | 386 -17% | 414 -11% | 338 -28% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 94 0% | 90 -4% | 98 4% | 99 5% | 84 -11% |
| Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.015 95% | 0.3 -3% | 0.01 97% | 0.16 45% | |
| Contrast | 1607 | 24867 1447% | 1393 -13% | 38700 2308% | 2125 32% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 1.47 41% | 1.6 36% | 1 60% | 2.8 -12% | 1.7 32% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.1 | 2.49 59% | 2.5 59% | 2.4 61% | 5.5 10% | 3 51% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.3 | 1.78 -37% | 1.1 15% | 2.2 -69% | 1.3 -0% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 1.7 59% | 2 51% | 1.4 66% | 1.8 56% | 2.9 29% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.179 101% | 2.14 103% | 2.24 98% | 2.21 100% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 7386 88% | 6556 99% | 6851 95% | 6466 101% | 6319 103% | 6729 97% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 69% /
120% | 6% /
9% | 145% /
217% | 40% /
20% | -5% /
5% |
* ... smaller is better
我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件对面板进行了测量，结果表明，面板有明显的偏蓝现象，色温过低，尽管这对最大亮度有积极影响。不过，色彩显示效果已经不错了。通过校准（可在上面免费下载配置文件），我们可以明显改善显示效果，但最大亮度降至 425 cd/m² 左右。有了完整的 sRGB 覆盖范围，这款笔记本还适合编辑图片/视频。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 31.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
除了阳光直射外，磨砂面板也可以在明亮的户外使用。IPS 屏幕的可视角度稳定性很好。
性能 - AMD Ryzen 8000 和 32 GB 内存
测试条件
VIA 14 Pro (M24) 是全球国际货运公司推出的第一款没有指挥中心的笔记本电脑；取而代之的是，可以通过 F3 键切换能源配置文件。屏幕上会简要显示当前使用的能源配置文件。共有三种配置文件可供选择：静音、平衡和性能。我们在下表中总结了相应的 TDP 值和性能数据。我们使用性能配置文件进行了以下基准测试和测量。
| 能源概况 | CPU TDP | CB R23 Multi | Time Spy 图形 | 最大。风扇容量 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 安静型 | 25 -> 15 瓦 | 10,593 分 | 2,492 分 | 30.6 分贝(A) |
| 平衡型 | 45 -> 35 瓦 | 15,250 分 | 2,877 分 | 36.2 分贝(A) |
| 功率 | 54 瓦 | 16,330 分 | 2,915 分 | 43.6 分贝(A) |
处理器 - Ryzen 7 8845HS
处理器由 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS改为 Ryzen 7 8845HS，它仍然使用 8 个 Zen4 内核（16 个线程），最高主频为 5.1 GHz。不出所料，性能也不相上下，所有对比设备的整体性能都非常接近。在多核和单核测试中，性能都非常出色，即使是要求苛刻的任务，也不会出现瓶颈。在电池模式下，最大功耗限制在 35 瓦，这也是多核性能降低 12% 的原因。
更多 CPU 基准测试 这里.
Cinebench R15 Multi loop
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2543 (2508.31-2568.38)
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2224 (2132.08-2595.21)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2436 (2302.42-2731.12)
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS: Ø2166 (2149.96-2176.16)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2535 (2513.19-2555.42)
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2424 (2389.2-2482.31)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (14895 - 18037, n=10) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1623 - 1783, n=10) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (5808 - 7026, n=10) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (673 - 698, n=10) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2342 - 2908, n=10) | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (269 - 283, n=10) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (179 - 216, n=10) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (62669 - 74664, n=10) | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (5197 - 6714, n=10) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11073 - 14014, n=14) | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2244 - 15220, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2510 - 2698, n=12) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (960 - 3130, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11256 - 12726, n=11) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1765 - 2004, n=11) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (18.6 - 22.7, n=10) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (44.4 - 77, n=10) | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (0.4336 - 0.4935, n=10) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (23708 - 29544, n=10) | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1141 - 32888, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (99659 - 125873, n=10) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6838 - 123315, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (4332 - 5180, n=10) | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (109458 - 124695, n=10) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11579 - 115682, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (14062 - 15519, n=10) | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (53436 - 67367, n=10) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (3366 - 65433, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (64515 - 172642, n=10) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (627 - 1080, n=10) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (166.9 - 1379, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (12361 - 15911, n=10) | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 53954, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (33826 - 41668, n=10) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
系统性能
系统基准测试的结果总体良好，威盛 14 Pro 在日常使用中始终反应灵敏。虽然不能升级内存，但标配的 32GB 内存已经足够绝大多数用户使用多年。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (7120 - 7641, n=7) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (10685 - 11570, n=7) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9787 - 10482, n=7) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9009 - 10009, n=7) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1633 - 1939, n=7) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1562 - 1872, n=7) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1734 - 2040, n=7) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1437 - 1849, n=7) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (295 - 334, n=7) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 448, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (245 - 314, n=7) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 325, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (501 - 664, n=7) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1104, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7120 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (14916 - 108756, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (61459 - 71873, n=10) | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (49866 - 61976, n=10) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (68425 - 93239, n=10) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (16513 - 112837, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7.4 - 187.8, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (82.5 - 117, n=10) | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试（上网、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载）中，使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备没有显示出任何限制。虽然有一个驱动程序略有故障，但重要的中断到进程延迟值非常低。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
威盛 14 Pro 为 M.2 2280 固态硬盘提供了两个快速 PCIe 4.0 插槽。基本配置中安装了 500 GB 固态硬盘，但我们的测试设备安装了 2 TB 版本的三星 990 Pro（附加费 138 欧元）。990 Pro 的传输速率很高，即使在长时间负载的情况下性能也完全稳定。初始启动后，用户可使用 1.76 TB。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
7124 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
6890 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
459 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
463 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
55.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
118.2 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:
388 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8:
1211 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
Continuous reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5739 (4853.38-5771.79)
图形卡
Ryzen 8000 系列仍然依靠我们熟悉的 Radeon 780M，它得益于内存的双通道配置。iGPU 非常适合日常使用，也可以玩游戏，不过在当前的游戏中，你往往不得不满足于低细节。在合成基准测试中，新的 英特尔弧形图形 iGPU(配备 8 个 Xe 内核）的性能略高于 780M，但游戏性能与 780M 不相上下。
即使在长时间负载的情况下，图形性能也能保持完全稳定，我们的《赛博朋克 2077》测试（30 分钟）也显示性能没有下降。不过，在电池模式下，GPU 性能的下降幅度很小（约 11%）。更多 GPU 基准测试可在 技术部分.
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 13077 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7731 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3234 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 2788 points | |
Help | ||
Blender: v3.3 Classroom CPU | v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (241 - 1127, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average AMD Radeon 780M (300 - 664, n=52) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (211 - 364, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11.9 - 44.2, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (13 - 99.5, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Cyberpunk 2077 FPS chart
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M: Ø21.6 (19.5-22)
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 147.5 | 133.8 | 64.1 | 26.1 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 122.9 | 102.7 | 84.1 | 75.1 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 75.6 | 38.2 | 28.8 | 20.9 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 53 | 38.1 | 30.9 | ||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 155 | 66 | 57 | 49 | |
| F1 23 (2023) | 85.9 | 76.7 | 53 | 11.6 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 40.1 | 31.5 | 25.8 | 25.4 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 41.5 | 32.2 | 25.8 | 22.4 | |
| F1 24 (2024) | 85.9 | 71.9 | 51.4 | 11.1 |
排放与能源
噪音排放
威盛 14 Pro 的冷却系统使用两个风扇，风量主要取决于所选的能耗配置文件。在空闲模式和简单任务中，即使在性能模式下，设备也基本保持静音。不过，在较高负载情况下，两个风扇的声音会明显增大，最大 43.6 分贝（A）的噪音也不是特别小。下表列出了其他能耗曲线的结果。风扇长时间处于关闭状态，尤其是在安静模式下。测试设备中没有其他电子噪音。
| 能耗曲线 | 3DMark 06 | 赛博朋克 2077 | 压力测试 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 静音 | 风扇关闭 | 28.8 dB(A) | 30.6 dB(A) |
| 平衡 | 36.2 dB(A) | 36.2 dB(A) | 36.2 dB(A) |
| 电源 | 36.2 dB(A) | 43.6 dB(A) | 43.6 dB(A) |
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 25.7 / 25.7 / 25.7 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 36.2 / 43.6 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.7 dB(A) | ||
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N | Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | 3% | 2% | 1% | 9% | |
| off / environment * | 25.7 | 25.11 2% | 23.8 7% | 25.1 2% | 23.9 7% | 23.5 9% |
| Idle Minimum * | 25.7 | 25.11 2% | 23.8 7% | 25.1 2% | 23.9 7% | 23.5 9% |
| Idle Average * | 25.7 | 25.11 2% | 23.8 7% | 25.1 2% | 23.9 7% | 23.5 9% |
| Idle Maximum * | 25.7 | 27.2 -6% | 27.1 -5% | 25.1 2% | 23.9 7% | 25.1 2% |
| Load Average * | 36.2 | 31.3 14% | 34.9 4% | 35.9 1% | 44.3 -22% | 32.4 10% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 43.6 | 43.7 -0% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 43.6 | 46.61 -7% | 43.7 -0% | 42.2 3% | 44.3 -2% | 37.3 14% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.3 | 41.3 | 34.9 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
威盛 14 Pro 的外壳在空闲模式和轻度任务时几乎不会发热，但在负载情况下会发生变化。在游戏和压力测试中，我们在底部中间区域测得的温度接近 50 °C，这就是为什么在这种情况下不能将设备放在大腿上的原因。键盘区域也会明显发热，温度高达 43 °C，但这里没有任何限制。在压力测试中，处理器的运行功率保持在 54 瓦。
在消极方面，我们注意到 100 瓦的电源，与 Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 电源略有不同。虽然在压力测试中，笔记本电脑的总耗电量约为 92 瓦，因此尚未达到电源的极限，但略低于 60 °C 的温度无疑过高。
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.9 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.8 °C / 92.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-5.5 °C / -9.9 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.9 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.8 °C / 92.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-5.5 °C / -9.9 F).
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -6% | -2% | 2% | 11% | 7% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 44.6 | 45.2 -1% | 43.7 2% | 43.1 3% | 39.6 11% | 41.5 7% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 50.9 | 49.2 3% | 49.4 3% | 50.2 1% | 38.6 24% | 45.7 10% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 26.5 | 29.6 -12% | 27.7 -5% | 25.8 3% | 24.8 6% | 24.7 7% |
| Idle Bottom * | 26.3 | 30.2 -15% | 28.6 -9% | 26.4 -0% | 25.3 4% | 24.9 5% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
耗电量
与 Tuxedo Pulse 14 相比，较高的面板亮度并不明显，94 瓦的最大功耗也略低于 Tuxedo Pulse 14。总而言之，这款产品没有任何惊喜，所提供的 100 瓦电源尺寸也足够大。不过，关机时的功耗仍然没有改善，0.8 瓦的功耗有点高。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.8 / 0.86 Watt |
| Idle | 4.8 / 8.7 / 9.2 Watt |
| Load |
63.2 / 94.5 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N | Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 11% | 2% | 27% | 5% | -8% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.8 | 4.4 8% | 4.4 8% | 3.6 25% | 5.3 -10% | 5.6 -17% |
| Idle Average * | 8.7 | 5.6 36% | 9.2 -6% | 6.6 24% | 7.2 17% | 9.2 -6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.2 | 12.5 -36% | 9.6 -4% | 7.4 20% | 7.5 18% | 9.7 -5% |
| Load Average * | 63.2 | 52.1 18% | 62.6 1% | 47.1 25% | 65.6 -4% | 65.2 -3% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 81.3 | 71.5 12% | ||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 80.2 | 71.9 10% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 94.5 | 67.3 29% | 101.7 -8% | 54.3 43% | 89.6 5% | 101 -7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 46.7 | 47.4 | 73 | 70 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk 2077 / Stress test
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø91.9 (88.9-94.5)
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø7.24 (6.23-10.7)
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø81.3 (78.4-83.4)
Power consumption with external monitor
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø81.1 (78.4-83.8)
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø80.7 (80-81.3)
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø31.3 (28.2-39)
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø80.6 (78.6-82.8)
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø68.1 (56.6-72.3)
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø8.14 (6.7-11.7)
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR - external Monitor: Ø80.2 (78.5-83.1)
电池寿命
与 60 Wh 电池配合使用，电池运行时间本身并不差，但威盛 14 Pro 还是被竞争对手打败了。频率对电池运行时间的影响微乎其微，从下表中也可以看出这一点。无线局域网和视频测试的亮度为 150 cd/m²，相当于测试设备最大亮度的 32%。
| 频率 | WLAN 测试 150 cd/m² | WLAN 测试最大亮度 |
|---|---|---|
| 60 赫兹 | 9:31 小时 | 6:16 小时 |
| 120 赫兹 | 9:28 小时 | 6:06 小时 |
在设备开启的情况下，充满电需要 141 分钟。大约 55 分钟后，80% 的电量即可恢复。
| SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 60 Wh | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 70 Wh | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 80 Wh | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 75 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 84 Wh | Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, 60 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 118% | 73% | 66% | 55% | 6% | 51% | |
| H.264 | 612 | 1251 104% | 1046 71% | 1031 68% | 595 -3% | 896 ? 46% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 571 | 758 33% | 888 56% | 774 36% | 710 24% | 620 9% | 719 ? 26% |
| Load | 64 | 194 203% | 101 58% | 123 92% | 110 72% | 72 13% | 116.6 ? 82% |
Pros
+ 极高的系统性能
+ 无 PWM 的 120 Hz IPS 显示屏
+ 标配 32 GB 内存
+ 2x PCIe-4.0-x4，最高 8 TB 存储空间
+ 舒适的键盘
+ 多种连接方式
Cons
- 无 USB 4.0
- microSD 读卡器速度慢
- 外壳对指纹敏感
- 差劲的 720p 网络摄像头
- RAM 焊接
- 电源温度高
结论 - 现在的申克 VIA 14 Pro 显示屏更加明亮
除了强大的 Ryzen 处理器和 32 GB 的标准 RAM 配置外，该产品的最大特点是具有良好的扩展选项（2x M.2-2280）。即使没有 USB 4.0 等现代标准，也有足够数量的端口可用。不过，microSD 读卡器的速度非常慢，720p 网络摄像头的性能也不强。尽管采用了新的表面，指纹仍然是个问题。
新的 Ryzen 处理器提供了充足的性能和快速的 Radeon 780M GPU，但与前代机型的旧版 Ryzen 7 7840HS 相比并无优势。2024 机型的最大升级是 IPS 屏幕，现在亮度明显提高。制造商的规格从 300 cd/m² 增加到 400 cd/m²，我们的测试设备甚至达到了略低于 470 cd/m²的平均值。经过校准后，画质也非常出色。
申克威盛 Pro 14 是一款 14 英寸的快速笔记本电脑，现在提供了更明亮的 IPS 屏幕，非常适合生产活动。性价比还算不错，但也有一些地方需要做出牺牲（没有 USB 4.0、网络摄像头较弱、读卡器速度较慢）。
与竞争对手相比，威盛 14 Pro 的 32 GB 内存和两个固态硬盘插槽尤其出色，这在 14 英寸机型中非常罕见。不过，一些竞争对手提供 OLED 面板，在电池续航时间方面也有优势。Tuxedo 现在也提供相同的 Pulse 14 Gen4，配备 Linux 系统，售价 1230 欧元起。
注：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息请点击 这里.
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
- 07/12/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Subnotebook - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
