申克威盛 14 Pro (M24) 评测--配备 Ryzen 8000 和更亮显示屏的紧凑型 AMD 超小型笔记本电脑
申克公司更新了其紧凑型 AMD 子笔记本威盛 14 Pro,与旧型号相比(我们测试的是 Linux 版本--"Tuxo Pulse 14 Pro"),威盛 14 Pro 的性能更胜一筹。 Tuxedo Pulse 14我们测试的是 Linux 版本--Tuxedo Pulse 14),它采用了新的处理器、更亮的显示屏和新的外壳涂层,应该不易沾染灰尘。
申克威盛 14 Pro(M24)的基本售价为 1099 欧元,保修三年(不含操作系统)。为此,它标配了 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS32 GB 内存、500 GB 固态硬盘和哑光 2.8K IPS 面板。我们的测试配置是 2 TB 版本的三星 990 Pro,并预装了 Windows 系统,因此价格提升至 1275 欧元。
在本文中,我们将重点介绍与旧机型的区别、更亮的显示屏,当然还有性能和对排放的影响。关于机箱、功能和输入设备的全面信息,请参阅我们对 Tuxedo Pulse 14.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.1 % | v8 | 07/2024 | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 1.4 kg | 18.5 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
83.5 % | v8 | 06/2024 | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.3 kg | 17.08 mm | 14.20" | 2880x1920 | |
85.5 % | v8 | 07/2024 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
88.6 % | v7 (old) | 05/2024 | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M | 1.2 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
88.1 % | v7 (old) | 03/2024 | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
89 % | v7 (old) | 01/2024 | Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | 1.4 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
注:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息请点击 这里.
与前身的区别
基本上,外壳没有任何变化。我们在测试 Tuxedo Pulse 14的表面非常敏感,很快就会留下指纹和污垢,而且清洁起来也不容易。为了解决这个问题,现在采用了一种新的涂层来减少指纹。效果也略有改善,但指纹还是比较好,你必须经常清洁机壳。我们还是希望能增加银色版本。
我们注意到 Tuxedo Pulse 14 上网络摄像头的绿色 LED 状态指示灯,这也导致照片中出现轻微的绿色光泽。另一方面,Via 14 Pro 使用的是白色 LED,在照片中也不明显。不过,720p 网络摄像头的图像质量总体上仍然较差。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=14, last 2 years) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=14, last 2 years) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) |
Networking | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
显示屏 - IPS 面板现在更亮了
威盛 14 Pro 仍采用哑光 IPS 面板,分辨率为 2,880 x 1,800 像素,格式为 16:10,频率为 120 Hz。它的面板 ID 与 Tuxedo Pulse 14 相同,但亮度有所提高。申克公司规定的亮度为 400 cd/m²,但我们的测试设备明显超过了这一标准,平均亮度达到 467 cd/m²。这也使它比 Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 亮度高出 100 cd/m²。黑阶为 0.29 cd/m²,对比度约为 1,600:1。
该面板给人的主观图像印象整体尚可,明亮区域仍略显颗粒感,也有轻微的光晕。没有使用 PWM,响应时间不明显,但不是特别快。
|
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 466 cd/m²
Contrast: 1607:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95, calibrated: 1.3
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
72.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T EDO0142, OLED, 2880x1920, 14.2" | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA ATNA40CT02-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 2% | 1% | 21% | 27% | 1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 70.1 | 72.42 3% | 70.3 0% | 98.6 41% | 99.9 43% | 71.1 1% |
sRGB Coverage | 97.7 | 99.79 2% | 99.7 2% | 99.9 2% | 100 2% | 98.7 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.3 | 73.94 2% | 72.1 0% | 87.3 21% | 98.9 37% | 73.2 1% |
Response Times | 24% | 3% | 95% | 97% | -29% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 31.1 ? | 7 ? 77% | 32.7 ? -5% | 1.31 ? 96% | 0.61 ? 98% | 37.9 ? -22% |
Response Time Black / White * | 17.1 ? | 22 ? -29% | 15.2 ? 11% | 1.2 ? 93% | 0.67 ? 96% | 23.1 ? -35% |
PWM Frequency | 238 ? | 480 ? | 240 ? | |||
Screen | 181% | 13% | 320% | -5% | 14% | |
Brightness middle | 466 | 373 -20% | 418 -10% | 387 -17% | 411 -12% | 340 -27% |
Brightness | 467 | 377 -19% | 408 -13% | 386 -17% | 414 -11% | 338 -28% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 94 0% | 90 -4% | 98 4% | 99 5% | 84 -11% |
Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.015 95% | 0.3 -3% | 0.01 97% | 0.16 45% | |
Contrast | 1607 | 24867 1447% | 1393 -13% | 38700 2308% | 2125 32% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 1.47 41% | 1.6 36% | 1 60% | 2.8 -12% | 1.7 32% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.1 | 2.49 59% | 2.5 59% | 2.4 61% | 5.5 10% | 3 51% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.3 | 1.78 -37% | 1.1 15% | 2.2 -69% | 1.3 -0% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 1.7 59% | 2 51% | 1.4 66% | 1.8 56% | 2.9 29% |
Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.179 101% | 2.14 103% | 2.24 98% | 2.21 100% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 7386 88% | 6556 99% | 6851 95% | 6466 101% | 6319 103% | 6729 97% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 69% /
120% | 6% /
9% | 145% /
217% | 40% /
20% | -5% /
5% |
* ... smaller is better
我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件对面板进行了测量,结果表明,面板有明显的偏蓝现象,色温过低,尽管这对最大亮度有积极影响。不过,色彩显示效果已经不错了。通过校准(可在上面免费下载配置文件),我们可以明显改善显示效果,但最大亮度降至 425 cd/m² 左右。有了完整的 sRGB 覆盖范围,这款笔记本还适合编辑图片/视频。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
17.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise | |
↘ 10.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
31.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.9 ms rise | |
↘ 16.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.2 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17365 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
除了阳光直射外,磨砂面板也可以在明亮的户外使用。IPS 屏幕的可视角度稳定性很好。
性能 - AMD Ryzen 8000 和 32 GB 内存
测试条件
VIA 14 Pro (M24) 是全球国际货运公司推出的第一款没有指挥中心的笔记本电脑;取而代之的是,可以通过 F3 键切换能源配置文件。屏幕上会简要显示当前使用的能源配置文件。共有三种配置文件可供选择:静音、平衡和性能。我们在下表中总结了相应的 TDP 值和性能数据。我们使用性能配置文件进行了以下基准测试和测量。
能源概况 | CPU TDP | CB R23 Multi | Time Spy 图形 | 最大。风扇容量 |
---|---|---|---|---|
安静型 | 25 -> 15 瓦 | 10,593 分 | 2,492 分 | 30.6 分贝(A) |
平衡型 | 45 -> 35 瓦 | 15,250 分 | 2,877 分 | 36.2 分贝(A) |
功率 | 54 瓦 | 16,330 分 | 2,915 分 | 43.6 分贝(A) |
处理器 - Ryzen 7 8845HS
处理器由 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS改为 Ryzen 7 8845HS,它仍然使用 8 个 Zen4 内核(16 个线程),最高主频为 5.1 GHz。不出所料,性能也不相上下,所有对比设备的整体性能都非常接近。在多核和单核测试中,性能都非常出色,即使是要求苛刻的任务,也不会出现瓶颈。在电池模式下,最大功耗限制在 35 瓦,这也是多核性能降低 12% 的原因。
更多 CPU 基准测试 这里.
Cinebench R15 Multi loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (15889 - 18037, n=6) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2485 - 21058, n=59, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1623 - 1783, n=6) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1111 - 2001, n=59, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (6231 - 7026, n=6) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2234 - 8233, n=55, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (677 - 698, n=6) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (408 - 790, n=55, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2537 - 2908, n=6) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (953 - 3345, n=61, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (269 - 283, n=6) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (151.5 - 307, n=56, last 2 years) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (163 - 597, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (179 - 216, n=6) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (64759 - 74664, n=6) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (26799 - 75402, n=52, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (5197 - 6714, n=6) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4341 - 6403, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T |
Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11073 - 14014, n=10) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6796 - 15059, n=48, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA |
Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2540 - 2698, n=8) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2003 - 3130, n=43, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11754 - 12726, n=7) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5688 - 14608, n=55, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1765 - 2004, n=7) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1426 - 2350, n=55, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (18.6 - 22.7, n=6) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6.2 - 21.3, n=54, last 2 years) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (44.5 - 77, n=6) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 98.5, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 0.77, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (0.4336 - 0.4935, n=6) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (25916 - 29544, n=6) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4588 - 32888, n=54, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (107613 - 125873, n=6) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (20465 - 123315, n=54, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (4627 - 5180, n=6) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1238 - 5287, n=54, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (114899 - 124695, n=6) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (47816 - 115682, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (14876 - 15519, n=6) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1518 - 18418, n=54, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (57671 - 67367, n=6) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11546 - 65433, n=54, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (67393 - 172642, n=6) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (24950 - 161430, n=54, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (627 - 1080, n=6) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (406 - 1379, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (13875 - 15911, n=6) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1459 - 17495, n=54, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (38580 - 41668, n=6) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (14337 - 53954, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA |
系统性能
系统基准测试的结果总体良好,威盛 14 Pro 在日常使用中始终反应灵敏。虽然不能升级内存,但标配的 32GB 内存已经足够绝大多数用户使用多年。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (7120 - 7641, n=4) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4528 - 7646, n=48, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (10685 - 11570, n=4) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (9143 - 11331, n=48, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9787 - 10482, n=4) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10449, n=48, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9367 - 10009, n=4) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4220 - 10983, n=48, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1779 - 1939, n=4) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1027 - 1971, n=54, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1716 - 1872, n=4) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (980 - 1875, n=54, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1942 - 2040, n=4) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1102 - 2210, n=54, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1523 - 1849, n=4) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (958 - 1899, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (295 - 334, n=4) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (225 - 448, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (245 - 266, n=4) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (176.4 - 325, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 707, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (501 - 531, n=4) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7120 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (67615 - 69523, n=6) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (22781 - 96791, n=54, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (23831 - 122210, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (49866 - 61976, n=6) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (85464 - 93239, n=6) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (23474 - 107658, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.4 - 187.8, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (85.6 - 107.1, n=6) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试(上网、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载)中,使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备没有显示出任何限制。虽然有一个驱动程序略有故障,但重要的中断到进程延迟值非常低。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
威盛 14 Pro 为 M.2 2280 固态硬盘提供了两个快速 PCIe 4.0 插槽。基本配置中安装了 500 GB 固态硬盘,但我们的测试设备安装了 2 TB 版本的三星 990 Pro(附加费 138 欧元)。990 Pro 的传输速率很高,即使在长时间负载的情况下性能也完全稳定。初始启动后,用户可使用 1.76 TB。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Continuous reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
Ryzen 8000 系列仍然依靠我们熟悉的 Radeon 780M,它得益于内存的双通道配置。iGPU 非常适合日常使用,也可以玩游戏,不过在当前的游戏中,你往往不得不满足于低细节。在合成基准测试中,新的 英特尔弧形图形 iGPU(配备 8 个 Xe 内核)的性能略高于 780M,但游戏性能与 780M 不相上下。
即使在长时间负载的情况下,图形性能也能保持完全稳定,我们的《赛博朋克 2077》测试(30 分钟)也显示性能没有下降。不过,在电池模式下,GPU 性能的下降幅度很小(约 11%)。更多 GPU 基准测试可在 技术部分.
3DMark 11 Performance | 13077 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7731 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3234 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 2788 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (256 - 1127, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (305 - 664, n=46) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
Average of class Subnotebook (223 - 364, n=2, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T |
* ... smaller is better
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 67.5, n=47, last 2 years) |
Cyberpunk 2077 FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
GTA V (2015) | 147.5 | 133.8 | 64.1 | 26.1 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 122.9 | 102.7 | 84.1 | 75.1 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 75.6 | 38.2 | 28.8 | 20.9 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 53 | 38.1 | 30.9 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 155 | 66 | 57 | 49 | |
F1 23 (2023) | 85.9 | 76.7 | 53 | 11.6 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 40.1 | 31.5 | 25.8 | 25.4 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 41.5 | 32.2 | 25.8 | 22.4 | |
F1 24 (2024) | 85.9 | 71.9 | 51.4 | 11.1 |
排放与能源
噪音排放
威盛 14 Pro 的冷却系统使用两个风扇,风量主要取决于所选的能耗配置文件。在空闲模式和简单任务中,即使在性能模式下,设备也基本保持静音。不过,在较高负载情况下,两个风扇的声音会明显增大,最大 43.6 分贝(A)的噪音也不是特别小。下表列出了其他能耗曲线的结果。风扇长时间处于关闭状态,尤其是在安静模式下。测试设备中没有其他电子噪音。
能耗曲线 | 3DMark 06 | 赛博朋克 2077 | 压力测试 |
---|---|---|---|
静音 | 风扇关闭 | 28.8 dB(A) | 30.6 dB(A) |
平衡 | 36.2 dB(A) | 36.2 dB(A) | 36.2 dB(A) |
电源 | 36.2 dB(A) | 43.6 dB(A) | 43.6 dB(A) |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25.7 / 25.7 / 25.7 dB(A) |
Load |
| 36.2 / 43.6 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.7 dB(A) |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N | Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 1% | 3% | 2% | 1% | 9% | |
off / environment * | 25.7 | 25.11 2% | 23.8 7% | 25.1 2% | 23.9 7% | 23.5 9% |
Idle Minimum * | 25.7 | 25.11 2% | 23.8 7% | 25.1 2% | 23.9 7% | 23.5 9% |
Idle Average * | 25.7 | 25.11 2% | 23.8 7% | 25.1 2% | 23.9 7% | 23.5 9% |
Idle Maximum * | 25.7 | 27.2 -6% | 27.1 -5% | 25.1 2% | 23.9 7% | 25.1 2% |
Load Average * | 36.2 | 31.3 14% | 34.9 4% | 35.9 1% | 44.3 -22% | 32.4 10% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 43.6 | 43.7 -0% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 43.6 | 46.61 -7% | 43.7 -0% | 42.2 3% | 44.3 -2% | 37.3 14% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.3 | 41.3 | 34.9 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
威盛 14 Pro 的外壳在空闲模式和轻度任务时几乎不会发热,但在负载情况下会发生变化。在游戏和压力测试中,我们在底部中间区域测得的温度接近 50 °C,这就是为什么在这种情况下不能将设备放在大腿上的原因。键盘区域也会明显发热,温度高达 43 °C,但这里没有任何限制。在压力测试中,处理器的运行功率保持在 54 瓦。
在消极方面,我们注意到 100 瓦的电源,与 Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 电源略有不同。虽然在压力测试中,笔记本电脑的总耗电量约为 92 瓦,因此尚未达到电源的极限,但略低于 60 °C 的温度无疑过高。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.9 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.8 °C / 92.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-5.5 °C / -9.9 F).
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -6% | -2% | 2% | 11% | 7% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 44.6 | 45.2 -1% | 43.7 2% | 43.1 3% | 39.6 11% | 41.5 7% |
Maximum Bottom * | 50.9 | 49.2 3% | 49.4 3% | 50.2 1% | 38.6 24% | 45.7 10% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.5 | 29.6 -12% | 27.7 -5% | 25.8 3% | 24.8 6% | 24.7 7% |
Idle Bottom * | 26.3 | 30.2 -15% | 28.6 -9% | 26.4 -0% | 25.3 4% | 24.9 5% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
耗电量
与 Tuxedo Pulse 14 相比,较高的面板亮度并不明显,94 瓦的最大功耗也略低于 Tuxedo Pulse 14。总而言之,这款产品没有任何惊喜,所提供的 100 瓦电源尺寸也足够大。不过,关机时的功耗仍然没有改善,0.8 瓦的功耗有点高。
Off / Standby | 0.8 / 0.86 Watt |
Idle | 4.8 / 8.7 / 9.2 Watt |
Load |
63.2 / 94.5 Watt |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N | Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 11% | 2% | 27% | 5% | -8% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.8 | 4.4 8% | 4.4 8% | 3.6 25% | 5.3 -10% | 5.6 -17% |
Idle Average * | 8.7 | 5.6 36% | 9.2 -6% | 6.6 24% | 7.2 17% | 9.2 -6% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.2 | 12.5 -36% | 9.6 -4% | 7.4 20% | 7.5 18% | 9.7 -5% |
Load Average * | 63.2 | 52.1 18% | 62.6 1% | 47.1 25% | 65.6 -4% | 65.2 -3% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 81.3 | 71.5 12% | ||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 80.2 | 71.9 10% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 94.5 | 67.3 29% | 101.7 -8% | 54.3 43% | 89.6 5% | 101 -7% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 46.7 | 47.4 | 73 | 70 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk 2077 / Stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
电池寿命
与 60 Wh 电池配合使用,电池运行时间本身并不差,但威盛 14 Pro 还是被竞争对手打败了。频率对电池运行时间的影响微乎其微,从下表中也可以看出这一点。无线局域网和视频测试的亮度为 150 cd/m²,相当于测试设备最大亮度的 32%。
频率 | WLAN 测试 150 cd/m² | WLAN 测试最大亮度 |
---|---|---|
60 赫兹 | 9:31 小时 | 6:16 小时 |
120 赫兹 | 9:28 小时 | 6:06 小时 |
在设备开启的情况下,充满电需要 141 分钟。大约 55 分钟后,80% 的电量即可恢复。
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 60 Wh | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 70 Wh | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 80 Wh | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 75 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 84 Wh | Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, 60 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 118% | 73% | 66% | 55% | 6% | 47% | |
H.264 | 612 | 1251 104% | 1046 71% | 1031 68% | 595 -3% | 858 ? 40% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 571 | 758 33% | 888 56% | 774 36% | 710 24% | 620 9% | 690 ? 21% |
Load | 64 | 194 203% | 101 58% | 123 92% | 110 72% | 72 13% | 114.3 ? 79% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 现在的申克 VIA 14 Pro 显示屏更加明亮
除了强大的 Ryzen 处理器和 32 GB 的标准 RAM 配置外,该产品的最大特点是具有良好的扩展选项(2x M.2-2280)。即使没有 USB 4.0 等现代标准,也有足够数量的端口可用。不过,microSD 读卡器的速度非常慢,720p 网络摄像头的性能也不强。尽管采用了新的表面,指纹仍然是个问题。
新的 Ryzen 处理器提供了充足的性能和快速的 Radeon 780M GPU,但与前代机型的旧版 Ryzen 7 7840HS 相比并无优势。2024 机型的最大升级是 IPS 屏幕,现在亮度明显提高。制造商的规格从 300 cd/m² 增加到 400 cd/m²,我们的测试设备甚至达到了略低于 470 cd/m²的平均值。经过校准后,画质也非常出色。
申克威盛 Pro 14 是一款 14 英寸的快速笔记本电脑,现在提供了更明亮的 IPS 屏幕,非常适合生产活动。性价比还算不错,但也有一些地方需要做出牺牲(没有 USB 4.0、网络摄像头较弱、读卡器速度较慢)。
与竞争对手相比,威盛 14 Pro 的 32 GB 内存和两个固态硬盘插槽尤其出色,这在 14 英寸机型中非常罕见。不过,一些竞争对手提供 OLED 面板,在电池续航时间方面也有优势。Tuxedo 现在也提供相同的 Pulse 14 Gen4,配备 Linux 系统,售价 1230 欧元起。
注:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息请点击 这里.
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
-
07/12/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.