Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 评测--配备 AMD Zen4 和 120Hz 显示屏的 Linux 超极本

Name: Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
Brand: Tuxedo

功能强大，结构紧凑。

Tuxedo 的 Pulse 14 Gen3 是一款全新的超小型笔记本电脑，配备快速的 AMD Zen4 处理器和刷新率为 120 Hz 的高分辨率 3K IPS 显示屏。此外，它还标配 32 GB 内存和多种连接选项。那么，这是一款完美的 Linux 超极本吗？

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 01/25/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Laptop / Notebook Linux / Unix Ultrabook Zen 4

Tuxedo 新推出的 Pulse 14 Gen3 依赖 AMD 当前的 Zen4 处理器，从而扩大了其 14 英寸紧凑型笔记本电脑产品组合。处理器 Ryzen 7 7840HS处理器，包括快速的 Radeon 780M iGPU以及 32GB LPDDR5-6400 内存和刷新率为 120Hz 的高分辨率 3K IPS 显示屏。配备三星 500GB 固态硬盘的基本售价约为 1,320 美元，而我们测试配置的 2-TB 版本三星 980 Pro 售价约为 1,500 美元。就价格而言，新款 Pulse 14 Gen3 仅低于著名的 InfinityBook Pro 14 Gen8（Linux 版本的申克 Vision 14 M23GeForce 价格从 1700 美元起）。除了基于 Linux 的 Tuxedo 操作系统外，Pulse 14 Gen3 还可以配置 Windows（虚拟机或双启动）。

此外，您还可以从申克公司购买一款配置相同的 Windows 版本，名为Via 14 Pro ，其 MRSP 略低，为 1,200 美元（保修期缩短为 2 年，您甚至可以以 1,110 美元的价格购买）。

Test device courtesy of Tuxedo Computers

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3

Processor

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS 8 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, 65 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)

Graphics adapter

AMD Radeon 780M, Core: 2055 MHz, RAM: 800 MHz, Adrenalin 23.12.1

Memory

32 GB

, LPDDR5-6400, Dual-Channel, onboard

Display

14.00 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 243 PPI, TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, glossy: no, 120 Hz

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Storage

Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0, 2048 GB

Soundcard

AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Connections

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: microSD (UHS-I)

Networking

MediaTek RZ608 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 18 x 313 x 222

Battery

60 Wh, 5200 mAh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Linux

Camera

Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard Light: yes, 100W USB-C PSU, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.391 kg, Power Supply: 265 g

Price

1369 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
89 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2024	Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	1.4 kg	18 mm	14.00"	2880x1800
88.9 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2023	SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.3 kg	16.6 mm	14.00"	2880x1800
88.2 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2024	SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU	1.3 kg	16.6 mm	14.00"	2880x1800
v ^(old)	12 / 2023	Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1.3 kg	14.9 mm	14.00"	2880x1800
88.6 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2024	Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	1.5 kg	15.6 mm	14.50"	2560x1600
87.8 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2023	HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl R7 7840U, Radeon 780M	1.4 kg	18.8 mm	14.00"	2880x1800
87.5 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2023	Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M	1.3 kg	15.85 mm	13.50"	2256x1504

外壳 - Pulse 14 采用铝质/塑料外壳

乍一看，新款 Pulse 14 Gen3 的外壳与 InfinityBook 或 Vision 14 非常相似。 14但仔细观察，你会发现其中有一些不同之处。价格昂贵的 InfinityBook 采用镁合金材料，重量仅略高于 1.3 千克（即使使用 99 瓦时电池），而 Pulse 14 Gen3 的外壳则由铝合金（显示屏盖和外壳下部）和塑料（外壳上部和显示屏边框）制成。就质量而言，这款笔记本电脑给人的印象相当不错，不过，其铝制表面尤其容易留下指纹印，而且也不是最容易清除的。遗憾的是，该设备没有银色版本。黑色版本的 Vision 14 则更容易保持清洁。新款 Pulse 14 可以选择在盖子上不印制制造商的徽标，也可以选择印制定制的徽标（甚至是彩色徽标）。

底座的稳定性很好，我们在使用较大的压力时才会压到中间的键盘区域。屏幕的柔韧性稍差，但我们无法从屏幕上看到任何图像错误。它的最大开启角度是 180 度，总的来说，铰链设置得很好，但在设置到不同角度后，显示屏会有一些晃动。值得庆幸的是，这个问题不像 InfinityBook/Vision 14 那样明显。

新款 Pulse 14 是同类产品中最小巧的设备之一，重 1.39 千克。这使得它比旧款 InfinityBook 略重。其 100 瓦电源重 265 克。

尺寸比较

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U DIN A4 ❌

连接性 - Tuxedo 没有使用 USB 4.0

尽管体积小巧，但 Pulse 14 Gen3 并不缺乏连接选项，因为除了总共 4 个 USB（2 个 USB-C 和 2 个 USB-A）外，它还具有完整的 HDMI 输出和 microSD 读卡器。这意味着在日常使用中，你可能不需要随身携带适配器。另一方面，它没有现代的 USB-4.0 端口。

左：USB-C 3.2 Gen 2（10 GBit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式 1.4a、Power Delivery）、HDMI 2.0、USB-A 3.2 Gen 1（5 GBit/s）、USB-C 3.2 Gen 2（10 GBit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式 1.4a）

SD 读卡器

设备右侧有一个 microSD 读卡器（弹簧装置），可惜只能通过 USB 2.0 连接。结合我们的参考卡（Angelbird AV Pro V60），我们测得的传输速率约为 20 MB/s。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=14, last 2 years)	54.3 MB/s +178%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	27.29 MB/s +40%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	22.7 MB/s +16%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	19.5 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=14, last 2 years)	72.6 MB/s +208%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	27.8 MB/s +18%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	24.85 MB/s +5%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	23.6 MB/s

交流

我们的测试设备采用了联发科的 WLAN 模块（MT9721K），它可能支持现代 Wi-Fi 6E 网络（6 GHz），但其运行频率仅为 80 MHz。这意味着它的最大传输速率被限制在 1,200 MBit/s，这也是我们的测试结果相对较差的原因。您可以选择英特尔的 AX210 显卡。尽管如此，在日常使用中，它的无线局域网性能绝对够快、够稳定。

Networking
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 MediaTek RZ608
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	943 (min: 884) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	949 (min: 932) MBit/s ∼56%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1633 (min: 1588) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1681 (min: 1584) MBit/s ∼99%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1319 (min: 961) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1441 (min: 726) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1569 (min: 1027) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1742 (min: 1441) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1785 (min: 1706) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1702 (min: 1687) MBit/s ∼100%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1597 (min: 1441) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1248 (min: 1007) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1587 (min: 1395) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1314 (min: 1278) MBit/s ∼75%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1364 (min: 1196) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1403 (min: 1292) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1514 (min: 1238) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1246 (min: 1020) MBit/s ∼72%

Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø943 (884-1016)

Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø949 (932-959)

网络摄像头

笔记本电脑的网络摄像头只使用了 720p 传感器，即使在光线充足的条件下，效果也不是特别好。此外，由于摄像头旁边的绿色状态 LED 灯非常亮，在照片中总是略微可见。此外，它还配备了一个红外摄像头，可使用 Windows Hello 进行面部识别。

ColorChecker Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3: 6.7 ∆E min: 1.41 - max: 13.86 ∆E

维护

底盖由普通十字螺丝固定，可以轻松取下。在内部，你可以看到两个风扇以及两个用于 M.2-2280 SSD 的插槽。除此之外，还可以更换 WLAN 模块和电池。不过，内存是焊接上去的。

保修

Pulse 14 Gen3 标配两年保修。您只需支付额外费用，即可将保修期延长至 5 年。

输入设备 - 舒适且发光

Pulse 14 的黑色键盘很容易让人联想起 14的黑色键盘，手感舒适，按键精准。除了大空格键外，键盘还非常安静。不过，它的布局并不理想，因为右上角的电源键与键盘融为一体，这意味着它很容易与 "删除 "键混淆。键盘采用白色背光，有两种亮度设置，但不是通过传感器自动设置的。

点击板（12.5 x 6.5 厘米）光滑细腻，运行良好，但其 "咔嗒咔嗒 "声有点大。因此，我们建议只用点击键盘输入。与键盘相比，点击板的质量不如 InfinityBook 好（而且更小）。

显示屏 - 3K IPS，刷新率为 120 赫兹

就其规格而言，哑光 3K IPS 显示屏明显让人联想到以前的 InfinityBook 或 14但现在频率从 90 Hz 提高到了 120 Hz。其他规格（2,880 x 1,800 像素分辨率、16:10 宽高比）也完全相同。我们注意到的一个变化是，亮度较高的区域看起来有点颗粒感。此外，我们还注意到显示屏底部边缘有一些细微的光晕。它没有亮度传感器。

Tuxedo 表示亮度至少为 300 cd/m²，而实际上，我们测试设备的平均亮度约为 340 cd/m²。其黑色值仅为 0.16 cd/m²，对比度超过 2,000:1。由于没有使用 PWM，它的反应速度可能不是最快的，但也不算太离谱。


367 cd/m²	354 cd/m²	350 cd/m²
328 cd/m²	340 cd/m²	333 cd/m²
310 cd/m²	334 cd/m²	324 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

TL140ADXP24-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 367 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 337.8 cd/m² Minimum: 11 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 340 cd/m²
Contrast: 2125:1 (Black: 0.16 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.3
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
73.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"	SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 CSOT T3 MNE007ZA1-3, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"	Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 ATNA40YK11-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"	Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 LEN145WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.5"	HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Samsung SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"	Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U BOE CQ NE135FBM-N41, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5"
Display		3%	25%	1%	24%	-2%
Display P3 Coverage	71.1	74.7 5%	99.75 40%	72.3 2%	99.8 40%	69 -3%
sRGB Coverage	98.7	99.6 1%	99.99 1%	99.7 1%	100 1%	99.1 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	73.2	75.8 4%	98.56 35%	73.4 0%	95.8 31%	71.1 -3%
Response Times		24%	70%	-19%	97%	-35%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	37.9 ?(17.4, 20.5)	32.2 ?(14.9, 17.3) 15%	2.2 ?(1, 1.2) 94%	43.6 ?(20.6, 22.6) -15%	0.82 ?(0.43, 0.39) 98%	50.4 ?(23.8, 26.6) -33%
Response Time Black / White *	23.1 ?(11.4, 11.7)	15.4 ?(5.6, 9.8) 33%	12.8 ?(11.8, 1) 45%	28.2 ?(16, 12.2) -22%	0.95 ?(0.44, 0.51) 96%	31.5 ?(17.7, 13.8) -36%
PWM Frequency			300		504.7 ?(100)
Screen		-8%	-29%	-9%	-14%	-12%
Brightness middle	340	402 18%	388 14%	357 5%	384 13%	436 28%
Brightness	338	371 10%	391 16%	348 3%	386 14%	416 23%
Brightness Distribution	84	86 2%	98 17%	88 5%	98 17%	89 6%
Black Level *	0.16	0.27 -69%	0.0411 74%	0.22 -38%		0.36 -125%
Contrast	2125	1489 -30%	9440 344%	1623 -24%		1211 -43%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.7	1.8 -6%	6.32 -272%	2 -18%	4.06 -139%	1.81 -6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3	3.6 -20%	8.82 -194%	3.8 -27%	6.73 -124%	4.73 -58%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.3	1.5 -15%	4.79 -268%	1.2 8%	0.49 62%	0.45 65%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.9	1.8 38%	2.61 10%	2.7 7%	1.1 62%	2.9 -0%
Gamma	2.22 ^99%	2.27 ^97%	1.772 ^124%	2.15 ^102%	2.26 ^97%	2.27 ^97%
CCT	6729 ^97%	6695 ^97%	6202 ^105%	6929 ^94%	6331 ^103%	6784 ^96%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		6% / -1%	22% / -3%	-9% / -8%	36% / 14%	-16% / -13%

* ... smaller is better

我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件（X-Rite i1 Pro 2）对面板进行了分析，开箱即用，显示效果非常好。在灰色调方面，可能会有轻微的绿色/蓝色色调，但在日常使用中您可能不会注意到这一点。色彩保持在最重要的 3 色以下，你不一定需要校准屏幕。尽管如此，我们还是进行了尝试（我们的配置文件可在上面免费下载），尤其是灰色调的描绘得到了改善。Pulse 14 几乎全面覆盖了 sRGB，非常适合编辑图片/视频。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
23.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11.4 ms rise
23.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11.7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
37.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17.4 ms rise
37.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20.5 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在室外，雾面 IPS 面板的表现非常出色，只需避免阳光直射即可。它的视角稳定性很好，只有对角线以上的角度偶尔会导致对比度明显下降，但这在日常使用中不会有太大影响。

性能 - AMD Zen4 和 32 GB 内存

Pulse 14 只配备 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS及其集成的 Radeon 780M显卡以及 32GB LPDDR5-6400 内存。交货范围包括所有 Windows 驱动程序，即使您没有同时订购 Windows 安装程序。

测试条件

Tuxedo 在其预装的控制中心中提供了不同的性能配置文件，默认情况下，配置文件Tuxedo Defaults已被激活。为了更好地将这款笔记本与我们数据库中的其他 Windows 设备进行比较，我们使用额外安装的 Windows 版本（11 Home）进行了以下基准测试和测量。在性能、功耗或风扇性能方面，我们没有发现两个操作系统之间有什么不同。

处理器 - Ryzen 7 7840HS

......（英文 Ryzen 7 7840HSRyzen 7 7840HS 配备 8 个快速 Zen4 内核（16 个线程），主频最高可达 5.1 GHz。在 Pulse 14 中，处理器的功耗在短时间内达到 65 瓦，几秒钟后又平衡到 45 瓦。这使得它的多核性能非常出色，与新的酷睿至尊 7 155H内的宏碁 Swift Go 14不过，Pulse 14 的性能也几乎完全稳定，即使在长期负载的情况下也是如此。此外，它的单核性能与新的流星湖酷睿至睿 7 155H 不相上下，后者的性能略低于旧的猛禽湖芯片。

在电池使用情况下，该处理器最多只能使用 28 瓦的功率，这就是为什么在没有插座的情况下，其多核性能要差 18%。更多 CPU 基准测试这里。

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2424 (2389.2-2482.31)

SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø1949 (1907.49-1999.5)

SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø1920 (1895.91-1955.32)

Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2151 (2090.3-2474.79)

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2541 (2513.35-2580.81)

HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø1746 (1507.22-1962.23)

Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø2158 (2124.16-2204.83)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	82.7 pt
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	80.7 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	79.4 pt
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	75 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	73 pt
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H	72.3 pt
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H	71.9 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	68 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	62.8 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (15515 - 17214, n=17)	16414 Points +6%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	16201 Points +4%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	15515 Points
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	15043 Points -3%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	13981 (12822.5^min - 13981.2^max) Points -10%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H	13401 Points -14%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H	12275 Points -21%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	11739 (8847.85^min - 11739.4^max) Points -24%
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=64, last 2 years)	11654 Points -25%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H	1912 Points +8%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H	1905 Points +7%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1779 Points 0%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1776 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (1718 - 1812, n=17)	1768 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1742 Points -2%
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=64, last 2 years)	1668 Points -6%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	1647 Points -7%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	1644 Points -7%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (6061 - 6744, n=17)	6414 Points +6%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6314 Points +4%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6061 Points
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	5425 Points -10%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5169 Points -15%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H	5153 Points -15%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H	4870 Points -20%
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=60, last 2 years)	4530 Points -25%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	4469 Points -26%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H	735 Points +7%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H	734 Points +6%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	690 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (661 - 705, n=17)	686 Points -1%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	679 Points -2%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	678 Points -2%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	655 Points -5%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	651 Points -6%
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=60, last 2 years)	636 Points -8%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (2473 - 2729, n=17)	2598 Points +5%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2581 (2513.35^min - 2580.81^max) Points +4%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2482 (2389.2^min - 2482.31^max) Points
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2475 (2090.3^min - 2474.79^max) Points 0%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	2205 (2124.16^min - 2204.83^max) Points -11%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H	2000 (1907.49^min - 1999.5^max) Points -19%
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=66, last 2 years)	1978 Points -20%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	1962 (1507.22^min - 1962.23^max) Points -21%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H	1955 (1895.91^min - 1955.32^max) Points -21%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	280 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (270 - 286, n=17)	278 Points -1%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H	276 Points -1%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	275 Points -2%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H	270 Points -4%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	266 Points -5%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	255 Points -9%
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=61, last 2 years)	250 Points -11%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	249 Points -11%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=64, last 2 years)	359 Seconds * -73%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	266 Seconds * -28%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H	252 Seconds * -21%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H	238 Seconds * -14%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	230 Seconds * -11%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	228 Seconds * -10%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	225 Seconds * -8%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	208 Seconds *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (185 - 229, n=18)	198.6 Seconds * +5%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (59538 - 73035, n=18)	69127 MIPS +2%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	67444 MIPS
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	61902 MIPS -8%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	60968 MIPS -10%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	59660 MIPS -12%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H	55429 MIPS -18%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H	54766 MIPS -19%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	52555 MIPS -22%
Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=57, last 2 years)	48297 MIPS -28%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (6049 - 6754, n=18)	6561 MIPS +2%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	6408 MIPS 0%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6403 MIPS
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H	6229 MIPS -3%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H	6115 MIPS -4%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	6110 MIPS -5%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6049 MIPS -6%
Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=59, last 2 years)	5478 MIPS -14%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5156 MIPS -19%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	11876 Points +1%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	11781 Points 0%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	11780 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (8446 - 12339, n=20)	11674 Points -1%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	10558 Points -10%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H	10515 Points -11%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H	10389 Points -12%
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=59, last 2 years)	10099 Points -14%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	9248 Points -21%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1967 Points +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (1837 - 2017, n=20)	1966 Points +1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1945 Points
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	1912 Points -2%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H	1873 Points -4%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	1857 Points -5%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H	1830 Points -6%
Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=59, last 2 years)	1790 Points -8%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1714 Points -12%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (11.7 - 21.8, n=18)	19.8 fps +2%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	19.4 fps
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	17.8 fps -8%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	17.4 fps -10%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	16.1 fps -17%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	15 fps -23%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H	14.7 fps -24%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H	14.6 fps -25%
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=59, last 2 years)	12.9 fps -34%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H	56.7 s * -13%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	55.5 s * -10%
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=58, last 2 years)	54.5 s * -8%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H	52.8 s * -5%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	50.9 s * -1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	50.4 s *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (38.3 - 68.3, n=18)	48.6 s * +4%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	46.9 s * +7%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	44.1 s * +12%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=59, last 2 years)	0.519 sec * -16%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4865 sec * -9%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	0.4739 sec * -6%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	0.456 sec * -2%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	0.4559 sec * -2%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	0.4477 sec *
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H	0.4474 sec * -0%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H	0.4409 sec * +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (0.4184 - 0.4739, n=18)	0.4394 sec * +2%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2482 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

199.4 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.9 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

280 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

6061 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

690 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1776 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

15515 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	96.4 pt
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	93.8 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	91.1 pt
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	85.3 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	69.6 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	65.7 pt
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU	60.7 pt
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	58.2 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	57.5 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (24712 - 28921, n=19)	26587 KRay/s +8%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	25717 KRay/s +4%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	24712 KRay/s
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	22071 KRay/s -11%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	18678 KRay/s -24%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	13563 KRay/s -45%
Average of class Subnotebook (1141 - 32888, n=59, last 2 years)	12716 KRay/s -49%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU	12623 KRay/s -49%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	12603 KRay/s -49%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (103755 - 123167, n=19)	113567 Points +9%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	111109 Points +7%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	103755 Points
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	93684 Points -10%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	79716 Points -23%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	69767 Points -33%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU	65571 Points -37%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	62873 Points -39%
Average of class Subnotebook (6838 - 123315, n=59, last 2 years)	60467 Points -42%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (4293 - 5155, n=19)	4797 MB/s +3%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	4646 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	4639 MB/s 0%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	4256 MB/s -8%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	3555 MB/s -23%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	3263 MB/s -30%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU	2905 MB/s -37%
Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=59, last 2 years)	2890 MB/s -38%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2872 MB/s -38%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (105028 - 125820, n=19)	116128 Points +2%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	115300 Points +1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	114236 Points
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	107879 Points -6%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	93769 Points -18%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU	88948 Points -22%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	84870 Points -26%
Average of class Subnotebook (11579 - 115682, n=59, last 2 years)	79151 Points -31%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	73454 Points -36%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	14944 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (13857 - 15525, n=19)	14941 Points +4%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	14385 Points
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	13499 Points -6%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	12132 Points -16%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	9475 Points -34%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU	8223 Points -43%
Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=59, last 2 years)	7967 Points -45%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7167 Points -50%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (55540 - 65812, n=19)	60589 Points +9%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	59053 Points +6%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	55540 Points
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	50190 Points -10%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	41822 Points -25%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	34945 Points -37%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU	31960 Points -42%
Average of class Subnotebook (3366 - 65433, n=59, last 2 years)	31473 Points -43%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	31388 Points -43%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	161430 MB/s
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	147611 MB/s -9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (67389 - 177158, n=19)	132175 MB/s -18%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	68795 MB/s -57%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	68099 MB/s -58%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU	61200 MB/s -62%
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=59, last 2 years)	59846 MB/s -63%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	56935 MB/s -65%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	53018 MB/s -67%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (949 - 1123, n=19)	1065 MB/s +6%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	1052 MB/s +5%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	1005 MB/s
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	960 MB/s -4%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	915 MB/s -9%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	819 MB/s -19%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU	818 MB/s -19%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	808 MB/s -20%
Average of class Subnotebook (166.9 - 1379, n=59, last 2 years)	741 MB/s -26%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (13100 - 15599, n=19)	14270 KRay/s +9%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	14018 KRay/s +7%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	13100 KRay/s
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	11834 KRay/s -10%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	9874 KRay/s -25%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	7057 KRay/s -46%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU	6948 KRay/s -47%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6899 KRay/s -47%
Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=59, last 2 years)	6591 KRay/s -50%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	46137 MPixel/s +19%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	44356 MPixel/s +14%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU	43331 MPixel/s +12%
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 54881, n=59, last 2 years)	40471 MPixel/s +4%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	38837 MPixel/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	38652 MPixel/s 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (17615 - 41516, n=19)	37735 MPixel/s -3%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	33689 MPixel/s -13%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	33560 MPixel/s -14%

系统性能

主观而言，Pulse 14 的性能非常出色，它确实是一款反应迅速的笔记本电脑。它的基准测试结果也非常出色，我们在测试过程中没有遇到任何操作系统问题。

PCMark 10 / Score
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	7428 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (7039 - 7651, n=8)	7381 Points -1%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G	7157 Points -4%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7039 Points -5%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	6625 Points -11%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB	6480 Points -13%
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=51, last 2 years)	6447 Points -13%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	6290 Points -15%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5687 Points -23%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	11168 Points
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G	11081 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (10519 - 11214, n=8)	11024 Points -1%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10519 Points -6%
Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=51, last 2 years)	10480 Points -6%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	10375 Points -7%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	10212 Points -9%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	9943 Points -11%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB	9781 Points -12%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9075 - 10970, n=8)	10327 Points 0%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	10279 Points
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G	9989 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9717 Points -5%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB	9647 Points -6%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	8950 Points -13%
Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=51, last 2 years)	8633 Points -16%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	8500 Points -17%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	7072 Points -31%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	9691 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9052 - 9987, n=8)	9600 Points -1%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9260 Points -4%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	9090 Points -6%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G	8987 Points -7%
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=51, last 2 years)	8124 Points -16%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB	7827 Points -19%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	7590 Points -22%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	6805 Points -30%

CrossMark / Overall
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	1840 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1566 - 1891, n=8)	1756 Points -5%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G	1682 Points -9%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1586 Points -14%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	1579 Points -14%
Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=57, last 2 years)	1578 Points -14%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1548 Points -16%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB	1523 Points -17%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1504 Points -18%

CrossMark / Productivity
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	1770 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1535 - 1823, n=8)	1690 Points -5%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G	1627 Points -8%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1535 Points -13%
Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=57, last 2 years)	1520 Points -14%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB	1513 Points -15%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	1510 Points -15%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1500 Points -15%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1417 Points -20%

CrossMark / Creativity
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	1999 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1556 - 2040, n=8)	1915 Points -4%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G	1835 Points -8%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1733 Points -13%
Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=57, last 2 years)	1732 Points -13%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	1730 Points -13%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1711 Points -14%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB	1646 Points -18%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1620 Points -19%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	1612 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1293 - 1749, n=8)	1528 Points -5%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1484 Points -8%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G	1429 Points -11%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	1372 Points -15%
Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=57, last 2 years)	1345 Points -17%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1339 Points -17%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB	1231 Points -24%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1220 Points -24%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	324 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (297 - 339, n=8)	323 Points 0%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G	322 Points -1%
Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 448, n=58, last 2 years)	306 Points -6%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	300 Points -7%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	297 Points -8%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	294 Points -9%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB	293 Points -10%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	287 Points -11%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	325 Points +2%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	319 Points
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	271 Points -15%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (248 - 319, n=7)	268 Points -16%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G	256 Points -20%
Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 325, n=57, last 2 years)	256 Points -20%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	248 Points -22%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB	231 Points -28%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB	562 ms * -11%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	544 ms * -7%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	535 ms * -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1104, n=66, last 2 years)	526 ms * -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M (485 - 544, n=8)	519 ms * -2%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G	509 ms * -0%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	508 ms *
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	504 ms * +1%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	496 ms * +2%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score		7428 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	80515 MB/s +19%
Average of class Subnotebook (14916 - 108756, n=59, last 2 years)	71417 MB/s +6%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	70532 MB/s +4%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	68322 MB/s +1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	67660 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (30937 - 72158, n=19)	66323 MB/s -2%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU	65837 MB/s -3%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	65123 MB/s -4%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	62540 MB/s -8%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	72244 MB/s +45%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU	70861 MB/s +42%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	70063 MB/s +40%
Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=59, last 2 years)	68938 MB/s +38%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	61602 MB/s +23%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (30497 - 62147, n=19)	58070 MB/s +16%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	50192 MB/s 0%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	49971 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	49766 MB/s 0%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	93323 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	92967 MB/s 0%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	92289 MB/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (34590 - 93323, n=19)	84045 MB/s -10%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	77965 MB/s -16%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	75291 MB/s -19%
Average of class Subnotebook (16513 - 117898, n=59, last 2 years)	74273 MB/s -20%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU	68174 MB/s -27%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	67695 MB/s -27%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	147.1 ns * -39%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	107.8 ns * -2%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	107 ns * -1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	106 ns *
Average of class Subnotebook (7.2 - 187.8, n=59, last 2 years)	105.2 ns * +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (85.1 - 112, n=19)	92.4 ns * +13%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M	90 ns * +15%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	86.9 ns * +18%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU	85.7 ns * +19%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试（网上冲浪、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载）中，使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备在使用实时音频应用程序时显示出轻微的限制。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4890.4 μs * -368%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB	4224.8 μs * -304%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1541.8 μs * -47%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G	1144.2 μs * -9%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	1045.4 μs *
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	542.9 μs * +48%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

Pulse 14 有两个用于单面固态硬盘的快速 PCIe-4.0-x4 插槽。基本型号配备了 500GB 的三星 980，不过我们的测试设备配备了 2TB 版本的三星 980 Pro（附加费约为 170 美元）。目前，它可以容纳 2 个固态硬盘，每个最大容量为 4 TB。980 Pro 的性能非常出色，即使在长期负载的情况下，它也能保持完全稳定--这并不总是必然的。更多固态硬盘基准测试这里。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7014 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5228 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 713 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 563 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 67.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 126.4 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 3003 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 2912 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	91.2 pt
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	89.3 pt
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	85.4 pt
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	70.5 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	64 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	60.1 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl ^-11! WDC PC SN810 1TB	57.1 pt
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U ^-11! WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G	56.5 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	51.9 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4057 (4023.18^min - 4057.01^max) MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (3339 - 4240, n=3)	3879 MB/s -4%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3779 (3653.24^min - 3779.28^max) MB/s -7%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3735 (3410.49^min - 3735.24^max) MB/s -8%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl WDC PC SN810 1TB	3265 (3244.93^min - 3265.06^max) MB/s -20%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G	3184 (3108.05^min - 3184.11^max) MB/s -22%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3039 (3024.06^min - 3038.99^max) MB/s -25%
Average of class Subnotebook (38.2 - 4852, n=59, last 2 years)	2962 MB/s -27%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	2305 (2283.64^min - 2304.98^max) MB/s -43%
seq write
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5344 (4329.15^min - 5343.96^max) MB/s +24%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4317 (4288.28^min - 4317.37^max) MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4139 (3546.88^min - 4139.15^max) MB/s -4%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (3385 - 4415, n=3)	4039 MB/s -6%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl WDC PC SN810 1TB	3465 (3398.98^min - 3464.7^max) MB/s -20%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3257 (3173.68^min - 3256.68^max) MB/s -25%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G	3249 (2938.52^min - 3248.91^max) MB/s -25%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	3001 (2954.22^min - 3001.02^max) MB/s -30%
Average of class Subnotebook (38.2 - 5344, n=59, last 2 years)	2933 MB/s -32%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	7134 (6641.68^min - 7134.1^max) MB/s +4%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	7105 (5951.3^min - 7104.52^max) MB/s +4%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl WDC PC SN810 1TB	6948 (6424.99^min - 6948.07^max) MB/s +2%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	6844 (6027.53^min - 6843.85^max) MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6688 (5486.85^min - 6687.65^max) MB/s -2%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (6149 - 6887, n=3)	6627 MB/s -3%
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 13544, n=59, last 2 years)	5252 MB/s -23%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G	5098 (4619.39^min - 5098.39^max) MB/s -26%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	3179 (2816.5^min - 3179.49^max) MB/s -54%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	6751 (5764.02^min - 6750.94^max) MB/s +36%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	6702 (6680.9^min - 6702.08^max) MB/s +35%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl WDC PC SN810 1TB	5153 (5061.06^min - 5153.12^max) MB/s +4%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4955 (4919.92^min - 4955.1^max) MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4948 (4932.49^min - 4947.77^max) MB/s 0%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (4847 - 5013, n=3)	4938 MB/s 0%
Average of class Subnotebook (38.2 - 9702, n=59, last 2 years)	4111 MB/s -17%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G	3759 (3254.99^min - 3759.39^max) MB/s -24%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	3752 (3716.27^min - 3752.48^max) MB/s -24%
4k q1 t1 read
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	84.2 (83.1^min - 84.24^max) MB/s +2%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	82.2 (81.81^min - 82.16^max) MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (58.5 - 91.9, n=3)	77.5 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	77 (75.74^min - 77.03^max) MB/s -6%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	69.8 (69.38^min - 69.81^max) MB/s -15%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G	62.7 (61.75^min - 62.74^max) MB/s -24%
Average of class Subnotebook (8.27 - 87.4, n=59, last 2 years)	61.4 MB/s -25%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	60.9 (60.46^min - 60.93^max) MB/s -26%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl WDC PC SN810 1TB	57.8 (56.71^min - 57.8^max) MB/s -30%
4k q1 t1 write
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	271 (269.23^min - 270.66^max) MB/s +32%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	227 (221.95^min - 227.04^max) MB/s +11%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (195 - 271, n=3)	224 MB/s +9%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	205 (203.95^min - 205.23^max) MB/s
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G	164.7 (159.96^min - 164.74^max) MB/s -20%
Average of class Subnotebook (12 - 360, n=59, last 2 years)	158.9 MB/s -22%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	156.9 (147^min - 156.91^max) MB/s -23%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	139.9 (137.26^min - 139.91^max) MB/s -32%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl WDC PC SN810 1TB	100.6 (98.29^min - 100.62^max) MB/s -51%
4k q32 t16 read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4286 (4274.43^min - 4286.07^max) MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (4079 - 4319, n=3)	4228 MB/s -1%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3550 (3532.61^min - 3549.83^max) MB/s -17%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	2700 (2252.61^min - 2700.15^max) MB/s -37%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G	1505 (1389.3^min - 1505^max) MB/s -65%
Average of class Subnotebook (11.1 - 4286, n=59, last 2 years)	1267 MB/s -70%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1016 (987.39^min - 1015.51^max) MB/s -76%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl WDC PC SN810 1TB	1000 (938.41^min - 999.95^max) MB/s -77%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	818 (740.82^min - 817.9^max) MB/s -81%
4k q32 t16 write
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (4189 - 4249, n=3)	4228 MB/s +1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4189 (4136.14^min - 4188.97^max) MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2269 (2219.27^min - 2269.08^max) MB/s -46%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	1760 (1708.14^min - 1759.52^max) MB/s -58%
Average of class Subnotebook (14.2 - 4189, n=59, last 2 years)	870 MB/s -79%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G	627 (616.63^min - 627.37^max) MB/s -85%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	436 (428.41^min - 436.3^max) MB/s -90%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	423 (385.5^min - 423.07^max) MB/s -90%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl WDC PC SN810 1TB	364 (331.19^min - 364.14^max) MB/s -91%

AS SSD
Score Total
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	8892 Points
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (8227 - 9134, n=3)	8751 Points -2%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	8571 Points -4%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	6129 Points -31%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5733 Points -36%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5490 Points -38%
Average of class Subnotebook (515 - 8892, n=58, last 2 years)	4325 Points -51%
Score Read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	3307 Points
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (3086 - 3307, n=3)	3186 Points -4%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3172 Points -4%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	2064 Points -38%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1453 Points -56%
Average of class Subnotebook (246 - 3307, n=58, last 2 years)	1372 Points -59%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1349 Points -59%
Score Write
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (3696 - 4414, n=3)	4027 Points +1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	3972 Points
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3797 Points -4%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3782 Points -5%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3373 Points -15%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	3039 Points -23%
Average of class Subnotebook (153 - 4469, n=58, last 2 years)	2309 Points -42%
Seq Read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	5525 MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (5010 - 5630, n=3)	5388 MB/s -2%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5107 MB/s -8%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4920.6 MB/s -11%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4757 MB/s -14%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	4224.68 MB/s -24%
Average of class Subnotebook (448 - 8075, n=58, last 2 years)	4057 MB/s -27%
Seq Write
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4961 MB/s +24%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4004 MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (2908 - 4004, n=3)	3629 MB/s -9%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	3544.16 MB/s -11%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3376 MB/s -16%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2850 MB/s -29%
Average of class Subnotebook (99 - 5120, n=58, last 2 years)	2631 MB/s -34%
4K Read
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	75.9 MB/s +5%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	72.3 MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	69.3 MB/s -4%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	67.3 MB/s -7%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (51.9 - 76.5, n=3)	66.9 MB/s -7%
Average of class Subnotebook (19.8 - 96.2, n=58, last 2 years)	58.5 MB/s -19%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	55.15 MB/s -24%
4K Write
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	233 MB/s +45%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	213 MB/s +32%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	205.42 MB/s +28%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (156.8 - 235, n=3)	184.3 MB/s +14%
Average of class Subnotebook (37.4 - 256, n=58, last 2 years)	176 MB/s +9%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	161 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	155.2 MB/s -4%
4K-64 Read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	2682 MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2586 MB/s -4%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (2446 - 2682, n=3)	2580 MB/s -4%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	1586.68 MB/s -41%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	910 MB/s -66%
Average of class Subnotebook (181.8 - 2682, n=58, last 2 years)	908 MB/s -66%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	786.7 MB/s -71%
4K-64 Write
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (3170 - 3859, n=3)	3480 MB/s +2%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	3410 MB/s
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3338.1 MB/s -2%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3053 MB/s -10%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2933 MB/s -14%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	2176.61 MB/s -36%
Average of class Subnotebook (105.9 - 3905, n=58, last 2 years)	1867 MB/s -45%
Access Time Read
Average of class Subnotebook (0.02 - 0.167, n=58, last 2 years)	0.05717 ms * -138%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (0.024 - 0.072, n=3)	0.054 ms * -125%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	0.039 ms * -63%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.03 ms * -25%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.025 ms * -4%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	0.024 ms *
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.021 ms * +12%
Access Time Write
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	0.101 ms * -304%
Average of class Subnotebook (0.017 - 0.352, n=58, last 2 years)	0.07341 ms * -194%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.027 ms * -8%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	0.025 ms *
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (0.018 - 0.026, n=3)	0.023 ms * +8%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.018 ms * +28%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.017 ms * +32%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6835 (6448.95-6864.4)

图形卡

Pulse 14 没有提供专用显卡，而是使用处理器集成的 Radeon-780M GPU进行图形计算。当然，它也得益于内存的双通道配置。iGPU 的性能非常出色，但新的 Arc iGPU(8 核）至少在合成基准测试中略胜一筹。不过，在游戏测试中，Radeon 780M 的优势并不明显。许多游戏都能以 1080p 的分辨率和高细节运行，只有在运行要求非常苛刻的游戏时，才需要降低一点期望值。当然，如果你想经常玩游戏，dGPU 仍然是一个更可行的选择。

在长期负载情况下，其性能完全保持稳定--无论是在合成 3DMark 压力测试中还是在我们的 Witcher 3 长期测试中也是如此。在电池模式下，纯 GPU 性能降低了约 8%。更多 GPU 基准测试这里。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	100 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	75.7 pt
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	74.8 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	71.2 pt
Average AMD Radeon 780M	68 pt
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	64.6 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	59.9 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	58.6 pt
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H	45.2 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	15860 Points +17%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	13524 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	13280 Points -2%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12866 Points -5%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (7868 - 14249, n=56)	12460 Points -8%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	11840 Points -12%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	11695 Points -14%
Average of class Subnotebook (968 - 16296, n=56, last 2 years)	9532 Points -30%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H	7202 Points -47%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	11887 Points +39%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	8971 Points +5%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	8538 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	8029 Points -6%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (4550 - 8816, n=58)	7747 Points -9%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	7455 Points -13%
Average of class Subnotebook (832 - 11887, n=60, last 2 years)	6964 Points -18%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	6341 Points -26%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H	5978 Points -30%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	4501 Points +49%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3172 Points +5%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	3027 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2808 Points -7%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (1496 - 3196, n=58)	2713 Points -10%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	2575 Points -15%
Average of class Subnotebook (804 - 4501, n=61, last 2 years)	2566 Points -15%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	2321 Points -23%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H	1797 Points -41%

3DMark 11 Performance		13338 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		7923 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		3380 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender: v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | v3.3 Classroom CUDA | v3.3 Classroom CPU

Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	72 Seconds *
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years)	72 Seconds *

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	115 Seconds *
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years)	115 Seconds *

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Subnotebook (241 - 1127, n=61, last 2 years)	561 Seconds * -67%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	503 Seconds * -50%
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	434 Seconds * -29%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H	426 Seconds * -27%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	397 Seconds * -18%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (300 - 664, n=54)	375 Seconds * -12%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U	371 Seconds * -10%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	348 Seconds * -4%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	336 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU	100 pt
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	63.1 pt
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U ^-1! AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	59 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	58.4 pt
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	50.4 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	49.1 pt
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	48.5 pt
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	37.9 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU	43.7 (41^min, 41^P1) fps +45%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	30.2 (28^min, 28^P1) fps
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	30 (27^min, 29^P1) fps -1%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	28.7 (25^min) fps -5%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	26.1 (25^min) fps -14%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	23.3 (22^min, 22^P1) fps -23%
Average of class Subnotebook (8.5 - 43.7, n=53, last 2 years)	21.8 fps -28%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	14.8 (13^min, 14^P1) fps -51%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU	53 (19.7^min, 34.5^P1) fps +96%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	27.1 (3.98^min, 18.9^P1) fps
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	26.5 (4.26^min, 18.5^P1) fps -2%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	20.4 (1.148^min, 12.8^P1) fps -25%
Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=56, last 2 years)	19.6 fps -28%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	13.1 (2.12^min, 9.35^P1) fps -52%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10.6 (5.85^min, 8.55^P1) fps -61%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU	44.2 fps +50%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	29.4 fps
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	28.3 fps -4%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	25.7 fps -13%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	24.1 fps -18%
Average of class Subnotebook (11.9 - 44.2, n=62, last 2 years)	23.4 fps -20%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	18.2 fps -38%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	18.2 fps -38%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU	70.7 (39.1^min, 45.7^P1) fps +43%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	49.6 (35.6^min, 39^P1) fps
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	47.7 (32.1^min, 37.4^P1) fps -4%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	43.4 (7.3^min, 9.3^P1) fps -12%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	43.2 (5.5^min, 11.5^P1) fps -13%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	43 (13.6^min, 21.3^P1) fps -13%
Average of class Subnotebook (17.7 - 70.7, n=61, last 2 years)	40.1 fps -19%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	27.7 (5.7^min, 9.98^P1) fps -44%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU	99.5 (86.8^min) fps +17%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	85.1 (75.2^min) fps
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	73.4 (47.4^min) fps -14%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	71.2 (59.4^min) fps -16%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	70.1 (57.3^min) fps -18%
Average of class Subnotebook (13 - 99.5, n=64, last 2 years)	62.5 fps -27%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	62 (50.9^min) fps -27%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	56.2 (47^min) fps -34%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU	97.1 fps +174%
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	37.5 fps +6%
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	36.1 fps +2%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	35.5 fps 0%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	35.4 fps
Average of class Subnotebook (20.7 - 97.1, n=57, last 2 years)	34 fps -4%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	29 fps -18%
HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	25.4 fps -28%

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M: Ø30.2 (28-33)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)	153.7	141.5	67.7	27.1
The Witcher 3 (2015)	160		50	30.2
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	141.3	117.9	94.8	85.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	81.9	39.3	29.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	58.6	43.1	35.4
Far Cry 5 (2018)	78	51	47	45
Strange Brigade (2018)	168.4	67.8	57.8	49.6
F1 2021 (2021)	223	115	87.1	36
F1 22 (2022)	98.8	89.8	66.6	17.9
F1 23 (2023)	92.1	83.1	59.8	13.9

排放 - 带有两个风扇的 Pulse 14

噪音排放

Pulse 14 配备了两个风扇，这的确是一款非常安静的笔记本电脑。即使使用最佳性能模式，风扇在空闲模式和要求不高的任务中也经常保持完全关闭状态。如果周围真的很安静，你只会注意到非常细微的呼呼声（约 25 dB(A)）。在使用最高性能模式时，我们测得的最大分贝为 37 dB(A)，考虑到它的性能表现，这已经相当不错了，而且它比 Vision 14的明显优势。我们没有注意到测试设备发出任何额外的电子噪音。

Noise Level

Idle		23.5 / 23.5 / 25.1 dB(A)
Load		32.4 / 37.3 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.5 dB(A)

	Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA	Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WDC PC SN810 1TB	Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G
Noise		-13%	-16%	-9%	-11%	-4%	-8%
off / environment *	23.5	24.5 -4%	23.5 -0%	25 -6%	24.3 -3%	23.4 -0%	22.6 4%
Idle Minimum *	23.5	24.5 -4%	23.5 -0%	25 -6%	24.3 -3%	24.1 -3%	22.6 4%
Idle Average *	23.5	24.5 -4%	23.5 -0%	25 -6%	24.3 -3%	24.1 -3%	22.6 4%
Idle Maximum *	25.1	30.4 -21%	26 -4%	26.2 -4%	27.9 -11%	25.3 -1%	24.2 4%
Load Average *	32.4	39.5 -22%	43.6 -35%	35.7 -10%	36.7 -13%	33.4 -3%	35.8 -10%
Witcher 3 ultra *	34.9	41.7 -19%	48.7 -40%		44.2 -27%	39.4 -13%	46.5 -33%
Load Maximum *	37.3	44.9 -20%	49.1 -32%	45.5 -22%	44.2 -18%	39.4 -6%	48.9 -31%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在空闲模式和执行非常简单的任务时，机箱几乎不会发热，即使在运行游戏或进行压力测试时，我们也注意到机箱底部中间部分的最高温度为 45 °C。这是完全没有问题的，在使用过程中，你可以放心地将笔记本电脑放在大腿上。键盘的最高发热温度约为 40 °C，虽然你在打字时会注意到这一点，但它绝对不会妨碍你的工作。在压力测试中，处理器在短时间内的功耗为 65 瓦，然后在剩余时间内的功耗为 45 瓦。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


39.7 °C	41.5 °C	37.2 °C
36.7 °C	40.4 °C	36 °C
29.2 °C	26.5 °C	27.3 °C

Maximum: 41.5 °C
Average: 34.9 °C


39.7 °C	45.7 °C	38.8 °C
33.7 °C	44.8 °C	32.9 °C
30 °C	32.4 °C	30.3 °C

Maximum: 45.7 °C
Average: 36.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 45.8 °C | Room Temperature 20.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


24.5 °C	24.4 °C	23.2 °C
24.6 °C	24.4 °C	23.7 °C
24.7 °C	23.9 °C	23.2 °C

Maximum: 24.7 °C
Average: 24.1 °C


24.3 °C	24.6 °C	24.6 °C
23.9 °C	24.9 °C	24.3 °C
23.6 °C	24.3 °C	24.4 °C

Maximum: 24.9 °C
Average: 24.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 25.5 °C | Room Temperature 20.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


39.8 °C	41 °C	36.7 °C
35.2 °C	40 °C	35.2 °C
29.8 °C	26.9 °C	27.1 °C

Maximum: 41 °C
Average: 34.6 °C


41 °C	45.3 °C	38.2 °C
32.7 °C	44.3 °C	33.7 °C
29.5 °C	30.4 °C	29.8 °C

Maximum: 45.3 °C
Average: 36.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 45.4 °C | Room Temperature 20.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.8 °C / 85.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-1.5 °C / -2.7 F).

	Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU	Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M	Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
Heat		-6%	-13%	-10%	-6%	6%	-10%
Maximum Upper Side *	41.5	45.8 -10%	48.5 -17%	36.5 12%	42.1 -1%	39 6%	42 -1%
Maximum Bottom *	45.7	42 8%	52.8 -16%	49.5 -8%	49.7 -9%	35.8 22%	47.4 -4%
Idle Upper Side *	24.7	27.5 -11%	27.6 -12%	25.5 -3%	25.7 -4%	25.2 -2%	28.8 -17%
Idle Bottom *	24.9	27.1 -9%	27 -8%	35 -41%	27.3 -10%	25.6 -3%	29.6 -19%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

两个扬声器发出的声音都很一般，而且功率也不大。对于会议或背景音乐，它们可能已经足够好了，但即便如此，我们还是建议连接耳机或外置扬声器，以获得更好的声音体验。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 良好的运行时间

耗电量

Pulse 14 配备了高分辨率 120 赫兹显示屏，但并不是最高效的笔记本电脑，空闲模式下的耗电量高达 9.7 瓦。这比同类产品高出很多，尽管它们有时更亮。在最大负载情况下，我们测得几秒钟内的最大功率为 101 瓦，后来平衡为 75 瓦。因此，100 瓦的电源已经足够。另一方面，它在待机模式或关机状态下的功耗接近 1 瓦，有点高。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.86 / 0.97 Watt
Idle	5.6 / 9.2 / 9.7 Watt
Load	65.2 / 101 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"	SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"	SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"	Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"	Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.5"	HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, WDC PC SN810 1TB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"	Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5"	Average AMD Radeon 780M	Average of class Subnotebook
Power Consumption		26%	-6%	3%	3%	17%	31%	6%	20%
Idle Minimum *	5.6	4.2 25%	5.2 7%	5.5 2%	5.6 -0%	6 -7%	4 29%	6.11 ?(2.7 - 14, n=51) -9%	4.47 ?(1.3 - 9.3, n=60, last 2 years) 20%
Idle Average *	9.2	7.4 20%	7.8 15%	10.1 -10%	8.8 4%	6.5 29%	6.5 29%	8.32 ?(4.7 - 17.6, n=51) 10%	7.6 ?(2.5 - 16, n=60, last 2 years) 17%
Idle Maximum *	9.7	8 18%	9 7%	11.2 -15%	9 7%	13.9 -43%	6.8 30%	10.6 ?(5.2 - 27, n=51) -9%	9.51 ?(4.1 - 16.8, n=60, last 2 years) 2%
Load Average *	65.2	42.8 34%	78.6 -21%	45.9 30%	58.5 10%	41.9 36%	48 26%	56.1 ?(19.7 - 93.2, n=50) 14%	46.2 ?(19.1 - 78.6, n=58, last 2 years) 29%
Witcher 3 ultra *	70	47.9 32%	86.8 -24%	60.9 13%	71 -1%	43.9 37%	52.3 25%
Load Maximum *	101	76 25%	121.2 -20%	104.1 -3%	100.6 -0%	50.8 50%	55.2 45%	74.9 ?(34.9 - 111.8, n=51) 26%	68.4 ?(24.2 - 121.2, n=60, last 2 years) 32%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø70 (67.2-74.5)

Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø75.5 (73.5-101.9)

Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø7.6 (7.18-9.64)

Power consumption with external monitor

Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø64.7 (62.6-91.3)

Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø74.7 (66-93.5)

Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø29.6 (27.2-37.8)

Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø66.3 (63.3-92.6)

Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø67.9 (61.8-70)

Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø66.4 (63.8-69.1)

Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø4.95 (4.62-6.68)

运行时间

这款笔记本电脑的电池容量为 60 瓦时，与配备 99 瓦时大容量电池的 InfinityBook 或 Vision 14 相比要差很多。即便如此，它的运行时间仍然非常出色，在我们使用 150 cd/m² 的适应亮度（测试设备最大亮度的 46%）进行的测试中，该设备在 60 Hz 的 WLAN 测试中持续了 10 分 20 秒，在 120 Hz 的测试中持续了 8 分 49 秒。在全亮度条件下，刷新率不再有任何影响，因为两次 WLAN 测试都持续了 6:36 小时。在视频测试中，我们注意到运行时间约为 10 小时。

在设备开启的情况下，一次完全充电大约需要 108 分钟，大约一小时后，80% 的电量已充满。在测试期间，发布了一个新的 BIOS 更新，可以设置电池充电的下限和上限。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		10h 20min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		6h 36min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		9h 55min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 12min

	Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, 60 Wh	SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 99 Wh	SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 65 Wh	Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, 73 Wh	HP Pavilion Plus 14-ey0095cl R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 68 Wh	Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 61 Wh	Average of class Subnotebook
Battery Runtime		33%	17%	-10%	14%	26%	17%	43%
H.264	595				737 24%			911 ?(527 - 1298, n=27, last 2 years) 53%
WiFi v1.3	620	823 33%	723 17%	479 -23%	618 0%	510 -18%	726 17%	726 ?(389 - 1585, n=62, last 2 years) 17%
Load	72			74 3%	86 19%	122 69%		115.1 ?(57 - 197, n=48, last 2 years) 60%

Pros

+ 极高的系统性能

+ 无 PWM 的 120-Hz IPS 显示屏

+ 标配 32 GB 内存

+ 2x PCIe-4.0-x4，最高 8 TB 存储空间

+ 舒适的键盘

+ 多种连接选项

+ 良好的运行时间

+ 运行安静

Cons

- 无 USB 4.0

- microSD 读卡器速度慢

- 外壳容易留下指纹痕迹

- 效果不佳的 720p 网络摄像头，LED 灯导致色调变绿

- RAM 焊接在机身上

评语 - Pulse 14 Gen3 的出色性能和显示效果令人印象深刻

Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 评论。测试设备由 Tuxedo Computers 提供。

Tuxedo 的新款 Pulse 14（以及申克的新款 Via 14 Pro）是一款有趣的 14 英寸子笔记本电脑，配备快速的 AMD Zen4 处理器。其总体性能优于价格更高的 InfinityBook 或配备酷睿 i7-13700H 的 Vision 14，尤其是在集成显卡方面。此外，它标配 32GB 内存，这意味着它可以从众多竞争对手中脱颖而出，但同时，它的内存是焊接的，不能扩展。

它的哑光 3K IPS 显示屏在没有 PWM 的情况下也能呈现良好的主观画质，继续给人留下深刻印象。此外，它还能非常准确地描绘色彩，刷新率也提高到了 120 Hz。它的散热装置有两个风扇，能很好地处理 AMD 处理器，总的来说，Pulse 14 比我们之前测试过的 iGPU 版本的 Vision 14 要安静得多。其出色的键盘在未做任何改动的情况下得到了采用。

新款 Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 是一款功能强大的 14 英寸子笔记本，配备了 AMD Zen4 处理器、32 GB 内存和高分辨率 120-Hz IPS 显示屏。遗憾的是，一些地方（网络摄像头、读卡器、无 USB 4.0）暴露了为了尽可能降低价格而进行的削减。

有几项功能暴露了这款笔记本电脑的低价，而有几项功能尤其显示出了削减的痕迹，包括网络摄像头（包括状态指示灯投射出的令人讨厌的绿色色调）、microSD 读卡器、普通扬声器和缺少 USB 4.0 支持。你必须自己决定这些东西对你来说有多重要。如果你能接受这些缺点，那么你将得到的仍然是一台速度超快、配备良好的 IPS 显示屏和 32 GB 内存的超小型笔记本电脑。此外，由于配备了第二个 PCIe-4.0 插槽，该设备的固态硬盘容量可以轻松（廉价）扩展。尽管有前面提到的缺点，但新款 Pulse 14 Gen3 的优点明显占大多数，因此获得了 89% 的高分。Pulse 14 Gen3 的价格从 1,300 美元起，但如果你只想使用 Windows 系统，那么你可以花 1110 多美元买到配置相同的申克 Via 14 Pro。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

新型 Pulse 14 Gen3 可直接从Tuxedo Computers 购买。购买，价格约为 1,300 美元起。与之相同的 Windows 版本申克 Via 14 Pro 可从Bestware 购买。-价格从 1,110 美元起。

Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 - 01/20/2024 v7 ^(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

85 / 98 → 87%

Keyboard

88%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

62 / 75 → 83%

Weight

70 / 20-75 → 91%

Battery

86%

Display

91%

Games Performance

81 / 78 → 100%

Application Performance

96 / 85 → 100%

Temperature

89%

Noise

96%

Audio

71 / 91 → 78%

Camera

18 / 85 → 21%

Average

79%

89%

Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 348 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 469273 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 评测--配备 AMD Zen4 和 120Hz 显示屏的 Linux 超极本

Andreas Osthoff, 2024-01-25 (Update: 2024-01-25)