2021年VAIO SX14回顾。2500美元的酷睿i7超极本
Vaio并没有在廉价笔记本电脑上胡闹。在今年早些时候回顾了贵得离谱的Vaio Z之后,该制造商又开始了另一个名为SX14的高端型号。这款2021年的机型在相比之下引入了一些重大变化 2019年的SX14模型,因此这两个模型之间的用户体验将不完全相同。
配置范围从配备16GB内存和512GB PCIe4 NVMe固态硬盘的Core i5-1155G7(1250美元)到配备32GB内存、2TB固态硬盘和触摸屏的Core i7-1195G7(2500美元),均支持vPro。每个SKU都配备相同的1080p IPS面板。相比之下,价格较高的Vaio Z配备了更快的Tiger Lake H35 CPU和更好的色彩。
SX14与其他14英寸旗舰型办公或专业消费型副笔记本竞争,如 联想Yoga Slim 7, 华为MateBook 14s, 戴尔Latitude 9420, 或 HP EliteBook 840 Aero.
更多Vaio评论。
Potential Competitors in Comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87.2 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.1 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
89 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 13.94 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.9 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
89.8 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
83.8 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2021 | VAIO Z VJZ141C11L i7-11375H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 3840x2160 | |
88.6 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Huawei MateBook 14s i7 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 16.7 mm | 14.20" | 2520x1680 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例--同样的行政外观
机箱与2019年的SX14保持一致,无论好坏。它在视觉上是一种高级设计,与最新的联想ThinkPad或惠普EliteBook相比仍然很好,但骨架相对更薄,更容易翘起。底座和盖子的边缘更容易扭曲,而键盘中心和外盖在施加压力时将明显弯曲。也可以听到一点吱吱嘎嘎的声音。
由于前述的薄而灵活的骨架,该系统比它看起来更轻。该 Latitude 9420 2合1例如,它的每个尺寸都更小,但却重了400克。这是一个令人惊讶的便携式14英寸笔记本电脑,即使它可能不是其尺寸级别中最小的。
连接性--大型港口变化
与2019年的SX14相比,端口选项有了很大的变化。最值得注意的是,专有的AC桶端口和传统的VGA端口现在都没有了,而是采用了双USB-C端口,每个端口都能使用雷电4、DisplayPort和Power Delivery。
无论出于什么原因,Vaio拒绝告诉我们这里使用的HDMI端口的版本。我们自己的测试表明,该端口能够以60赫兹的速度输出到4K外部显示器,这意味着它至少是2.0版本。
通信 - 升级到Wi-Fi 6
网络摄像头
维护 - 不同的内部结构
底部面板需要耐心拆除,因为它是由不少于17颗飞利浦螺钉固定的。然后可以拆下键盘板,因为主板是倒置的,与大多数其他笔记本电脑不同。维修时要注意连接键盘板和主板的脆弱丝带。
用户不能升级内存,因为模块是焊接的。
配件和保修
除了通常的交流电适配器和文件之外,零售盒还包括一块擦拭布。标准的一年有限制造商保修适用。
输入设备 - 比以前更大的点击板
键盘
钥匙反馈位于较软的雷蛇刀片14和更清晰的惠普Spectre系列之间。然而,Vaio的键盘面板倾向于更多的弯曲,这导致了更多的按键反馈,特别是在中心位置。
触摸板
Vaio增加了点击板的表面积,从2019年SX14的8 x 4.5厘米增加到2021年型号的11 x 6.2厘米。专用的鼠标按钮也保持不变,但它们更薄、更轻,而且更靠近笔记本的前缘。
显示 - 仅1080p 16:9
我们较新的2021年SX12使用了夏普面板,其亮度和对比度高于较旧的2019年SX12上的京东方面板。反过来说,夏普面板的黑白和灰度响应时间较慢,有更明显的重影现象。文字和图像在其他方面都很锐利和鲜艳,特别是由于光面触摸屏层很薄,以保持重量的控制。
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 373.4 cd/m²
Contrast: 1623:1 (Black: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.99 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.49
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
67.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.02
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K Sharp LQ140M1JW55, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 LEN140WQ+, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA AU Optronics AUO068B, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | VAIO Z VJZ141C11L BOE NE140QUM-N62, IPS, 3840x2160, 14" | Huawei MateBook 14s i7 CSOTT3 U17B MNE208ZA1-3, LTPS, 2520x1680, 14.2" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 13% | 10% | 1% | 24% | 2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 66.8 | 80.7 21% | 76.9 15% | 68 2% | 95.7 43% | 67.8 1% |
sRGB Coverage | 97.7 | 100 2% | 99.8 2% | 97.6 0% | 99.5 2% | 98.3 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.9 | 79.7 17% | 76.7 13% | 69.3 2% | 86.4 27% | 70.1 3% |
Response Times | 15% | 43% | 25% | 27% | 42% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 54 ? | 54 ? -0% | 36.4 ? 33% | 48 ? 11% | 46.8 ? 13% | 37.6 ? 30% |
Response Time Black / White * | 46.4 ? | 32.8 ? 29% | 22.4 ? 52% | 28.8 ? 38% | 28 ? 40% | 21.6 ? 53% |
PWM Frequency | 27780 ? | |||||
Screen | -36% | -1% | -39% | -39% | 6% | |
Brightness middle | 373.4 | 483.6 30% | 410 10% | 466.4 25% | 368.3 -1% | 419 12% |
Brightness | 376 | 465 24% | 395 5% | 426 13% | 361 -4% | 407 8% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 92 5% | 91 3% | 84 -5% | 90 2% | 93 6% |
Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.32 -39% | 0.29 -26% | 0.32 -39% | 0.22 4% | 0.23 -0% |
Contrast | 1623 | 1511 -7% | 1414 -13% | 1458 -10% | 1674 3% | 1822 12% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.99 | 3.69 -23% | 3.24 -8% | 2.84 5% | 3.27 -9% | 1.9 36% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.29 | 5.97 -13% | 5.26 1% | 4.73 11% | 5.43 -3% | 3.6 32% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.49 | 2.05 -318% | 0.41 16% | 2.27 -363% | 2.33 -376% | 0.9 -84% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 3.5 19% | 4.2 2% | 3.7 14% | 2.9 33% | 2.9 33% |
Gamma | 2.02 109% | 2.04 108% | 2.18 101% | 2.13 103% | 2.2 100% | 2.14 103% |
CCT | 6537 99% | 6158 106% | 6012 108% | 6886 94% | 6071 107% | 6733 97% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 76.8 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.5 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -3% /
-18% | 17% /
8% | -4% /
-21% | 4% /
-16% | 17% /
10% |
* ... smaller is better
色彩空间涵盖了98%的sRGB,与2019年的SX14上并无不同。用户可能想考虑价格较高的 Vaio Z以获得更广泛的DCI-P3覆盖。
X-Rite色度计的测量结果显示,开箱后的灰度和色彩精确度都很一般。适当的校准将使灰度和色彩deltaE值分别降至0.7和0.49,以充分利用面板的高sRGB覆盖率。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
46.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26 ms rise | |
↘ 20.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
54 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24 ms rise | |
↘ 30 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
室外能见度与Vaio Z或联想IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro相当,但比XPS 13或HP EliteBook 840 Aero差,因为后者都有一个更明亮的显示屏。无论你在哪里工作,都会有一定程度的眩光。
性能 - 比普通的酷睿i7 U系列CPU更快
测试条件
在运行以下任何性能基准测试之前,我们的设备通过Vaio控制中心被设置为性能模式,以获得尽可能高的分数。我们建议用户熟悉这个软件,因为几乎所有笔记本电脑的特定功能都在这里切换,包括键盘背光、USB供电行为、红外传感器、宏和其他选项。
处理器
原始的CPU性能是非常好的,尽管结果只是比许多人略微好一些 酷睿i7-1165G7替代品。优秀的威刚XPG Xenia 14例如,它配备了i7-1165G7,在单线程和多线程应用中都只落后几个百分点。这些小差距对大多数用户来说可能不会有太大影响。
用户可能想考虑AMD Ryzen的替代品,以获得处理器性能的更大提升。这款 Ryzen 7 5700U或 5800U 提供了明显更快的多线程性能,尽管其代价是集成显卡较慢,单线程性能比我们的 i7-1195G7.
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr -2! | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K -2! | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 -2! | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA -2! | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA -2! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 -2! | |
VAIO SX14 -10! | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro -2! | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (3142 - 6806, n=9) | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (1290 - 1624, n=9) | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (1212 - 2590, n=9) | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
VAIO SX14 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (498 - 620, n=9) | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
VAIO SX14 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (574 - 999, n=9) | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
VAIO SX14 | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (198 - 238, n=8) | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
VAIO SX14 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (473 - 1211, n=10) | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (17053 - 26183, n=9) | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (5059 - 5890, n=9) | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (4241 - 6349, n=7) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (1519 - 1649, n=7) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (4.23 - 8.8, n=9) | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (39.2 - 83.9, n=9) | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (0.53 - 0.611, n=9) | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (4378 - 7361, n=9) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (20576 - 30422, n=9) | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (1310 - 2026, n=9) | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (38530 - 56262, n=9) | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (3209 - 4937, n=9) | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (12142 - 18123, n=9) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (30854 - 70936, n=9) | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (231 - 399, n=10) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (2300 - 3949, n=9) | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (13455 - 35235, n=9) |
系统性能
PCMark得分一直领先于2019年的SX14,特别是在数字内容创作中,Iris Xe可以在过时的UHD Graphics 620周围跑一圈。
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5067 - 5406, n=6) | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
VAIO SX14 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10156 - 10614, n=6) | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
VAIO SX14 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6637 - 7390, n=6) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
VAIO SX14 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4737 - 5941, n=6) | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
VAIO SX14 |
PCMark 10 Score | 5117 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (23332 - 57053, n=10) | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (24068 - 53332, n=10) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (22151 - 59019, n=10) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Average Intel Core i7-1195G7 (69.8 - 114.4, n=10) | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示了在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时的DPC问题。在60 FPS的情况下,4K视频播放很流畅,没有任何掉帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - PCIe4标准
与Vaio Z一样,SX14采用了PCIe4固态硬盘。 三星PM9A1系列,读写速度明显快于仍在运行PCIe3驱动器的任何笔记本电脑。然而,该系统没有散热器,这可能会影响驱动器的寿命,因为众所周知,NVMe SSD的运行温度很高。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能--Iris Xe正在变得更好
图形性能比配备同样集成的普通笔记本电脑快约15%至25%。 Iris Xe 96 EUsGPU,考虑到Core U系列CPU有限的TDP,这是相当令人印象深刻的。联想联想IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro例如,联想IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro配备了相同的GPU,但采用了更高功率的Core i7-11370H,但我们Vaio的GPU能够与联想并驾齐驱。目前,游戏性能也比任何集成的Radeon RX Vega解决方案更快,但其优势会因标题不同而不同。
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E -1! | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 -2! |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 | |
VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2867 - 7676, n=202) | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 82A300CNGE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 7381 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 21858 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5222 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2029 points | |
Help |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 113 | 99.3 | 32.7 | 12.9 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 95.8 | 57.5 | 36.6 | 17.3 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 136 | 96.1 | 63.1 | 59.3 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 45.3 | 24.6 | 17.2 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 43.7 | 38.5 | 34.1 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 60 | 32 | 30 | 27 |
排放 - 在需要的时候很响亮
系统噪音
风扇噪音取决于Vaio控制中心的风扇设置,可以在静音、平衡和性能之间进行切换。如果设置为静音或平衡模式,系统一般是安静的,甚至几乎察觉不到,但是性能模式在简单的视频流或浏览网页时,会引起略高于31 dB(A)的风扇噪音,而静音背景为23.8 dB(A)。我们建议在运行这类要求不高的应用程序时避免使用性能模式,以尽可能地保持风扇噪音。
当在性能模式下运行游戏等高负荷时,Vaio比其他大多数超极本的声音要大。 Witcher 3例如,在性能模式下,风扇噪音几乎达到50分贝(A),而在戴尔Latitude 9420二合一或华为MateBook 14s上,风扇噪音分别只有41分贝(A)或32分贝(A)。如果在平衡模式下,这个上限将下降到更容易管理的39.6 dB(A),但代价是性能下降和核心温度升高。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.3 / 24.3 / 31.3 dB(A) |
Load |
| 36.6 / 51.5 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.8 dB(A) |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1195G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X073N | VAIO Z VJZ141C11L Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11375H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Huawei MateBook 14s i7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 10% | 10% | 19% | -2% | 9% | |
off / environment * | 23.8 | 25.4 -7% | 24.6 -3% | 24.1 -1% | 26.1 -10% | 24.3 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.3 | 25.4 -5% | 24.7 -2% | 24.2 -0% | 26.1 -7% | 24.3 -0% |
Idle Average * | 24.3 | 25.4 -5% | 24.7 -2% | 24.2 -0% | 26.1 -7% | 24.3 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 31.3 | 25.4 19% | 24.7 21% | 24.2 23% | 29.9 4% | 28.4 9% |
Load Average * | 36.6 | 25.4 31% | 30.8 16% | 26.9 27% | 36.3 1% | 31.7 13% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.6 | 41.3 17% | 33 33% | 27.9 44% | 43.7 12% | 31.7 36% |
Load Maximum * | 51.5 | 41.3 20% | 46.4 10% | 29.9 42% | 55.4 -8% | 46.8 9% |
* ... smaller is better
温度 - 暖底
由于内部不对称的冷却解决方案,笔记本的左半部分总是比右半部分更热。相比之下,其他高端超极本如惠普Spectre或 戴尔XPS 13倾向于采用对称的冷却解决方案,因此它们通常是朝中间的方向最热。底部面板可以变得相当闷热,几乎达到50摄氏度,因为它没有通风格栅,而键盘热点最高只有34摄氏度,而老款2019 SX14的温度几乎为44摄氏度。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.2 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 20.7 °C / 69 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.6 °C / 78.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+2.7 °C / 4.8 F).
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Huawei MateBook 14s i7 Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | VAIO SX14 Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -14% | 0% | -22% | -4% | -3% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 36.2 | 43.4 -20% | 39.4 -9% | 39.2 -8% | 41.1 -14% | 38.7 -7% |
Maximum Bottom * | 50.2 | 48 4% | 51.4 -2% | 51.2 -2% | 45.4 10% | 42 16% |
Idle Upper Side * | 21.4 | 29.8 -39% | 21.6 -1% | 33 -54% | 25.3 -18% | 26.2 -22% |
Idle Bottom * | 27.8 | 28 -1% | 24.6 12% | 34 -22% | 26.5 5% | 27 3% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当在Prime95压力下,CPU会在第一秒左右提升到4.4GHz,然后下降并稳定在3.2至3.4GHz和94C。Vaio的核心温度比许多其他采用较慢的U系列CPU的超极本要高,包括威刚XPG Xenia 14和 华硕ZenBook 14在类似的测试条件下,CPU温度将分别稳定在90℃和68℃。在我们的Vaio上,持续的PL1性能似乎是在32W。
运行 Witcher 3将导致稳定的GPU和内存时钟分别为1300MHz和2000MHz左右,与我们在Vaio上观察到的情况相似。 框架笔记本电脑和XPG Xenia 14。
用电池供电运行不会对性能产生显著影响。在电池上进行的3DMark 11测试将全面返回几乎相同的分数。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 32 |
Prime95压力 | 3.2 - 3.4 | -- | 90 |
Prime95 + FurMark压力 | 1.8 - 2.4 | 800 - 1100 | 68 - 78 |
Witcher 3 应力 | 1.8 - 4.5 | 1200 - 1400 | 74 |
发言人
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理--要求相当高
消耗功率
除了那些有独立的Nvidia MX GPU的超极本外,功耗通常高于其他大多数超极本。在桌面上空转会消耗10瓦至15瓦,而在戴尔Latitude 9420二合一或IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro上的消耗量仅为一半。这一趋势在运行更高的负载(如游戏)时仍在继续,表明上述高于平均水平的图形性能是以高于平均水平的功耗为代价的。也许不令人惊讶的是,总体消耗非常接近我们在Vaio Z上测量的结果。
由于控制中心菜单上默认启用了USB睡眠和充电功能,当系统关闭或处于待机模式时,功耗可能高达6W至20W。
在运行Prime95时,我们能够从小型(约7.7 x 4.5 x 2.8厘米)65瓦的交流适配器中记录到66瓦的最大消耗。在运行这样的极端负载时,电池将不会充电。
Off / Standby | 6 / 19.5 Watt |
Idle | 3.3 / 13.9 / 15.9 Watt |
Load |
54 / 66 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X073N, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | VAIO Z VJZ141C11L i7-11375H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 3840x2160, 14" | Huawei MateBook 14s i7 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, LTPS, 2520x1680, 14.2" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 8% | 11% | 28% | -30% | 6% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.3 | 4.6 -39% | 4.8 -45% | 3.2 3% | 9.5 -188% | 4.4 -33% |
Idle Average * | 13.9 | 7.8 44% | 7.9 43% | 5.4 61% | 13.7 1% | 8.7 37% |
Idle Maximum * | 15.9 | 8.2 48% | 8.6 46% | 6.9 57% | 14.4 9% | 9.6 40% |
Load Average * | 54 | 47.9 11% | 46.5 14% | 38.9 28% | 54.3 -1% | 46 15% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 46.6 | 38.8 17% | 43 8% | 37 21% | 46.1 1% | 42.2 9% |
Load Maximum * | 66 | 87.1 -32% | 67.4 -2% | 66.5 -1% | 65.5 1% | 87.6 -33% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
电池寿命
电池容量已从2019年老款SX14的38Wh增加到我们最新款的53Wh。因此,我们的电池寿命结果现在延长了几个小时,实际使用WLAN近9小时。
从空到满的充电大约需要90分钟。两个USB-C端口中的任何一个都可以用来充电。
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 53 Wh | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Pro 14IHU5 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 61 Wh | HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 53 Wh | Huawei MateBook 14s i7 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | VAIO SX14 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 38 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 56% | -12% | 54% | 40% | -13% | |
Reader / Idle | 2046 | 1721 -16% | 889 -57% | 1487 -27% | 605 -70% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 532 | 699 31% | 502 -6% | 685 29% | 618 16% | 339 -36% |
Load | 58 | 146 152% | 73 26% | 151 160% | 95 64% | 96 66% |
H.264 | 693 | 390 |
Pros
Cons
评语--小的变化,大的收获
从外观上看,2021年的SX14似乎并不像一个巨大的升级。 2019年的SX14.当看到里面的主板时,情况就翻转了,因为Vaio几乎改变了硬件的一切,从冷却方案到端口和处理器。用户不仅得到了一台速度更快的笔记本电脑,甚至比以前的图形更快,而且较新的型号设法整合了更大容量的电池和更多的铜质热管,以弥补更高的功率需求,同时保持非常低的重量,只有1.1公斤。
轻巧的2021年Vaio SX14与2019年的前辈相比,带来了重大的内部改进和变化。与戴尔、惠普或联想的流行替代品相比,巨大的风扇噪音和更轻薄的底座和盖子仍然难以忽视。
主要缺点仍然与2019年的SX14相同,因为没有重大的外观变化。与华为MateBook 14s等替代品相比,底座和盖子都更容易弯曲。 华为MateBook 14s, 联想瑜伽系列,戴尔XPS 13。 HP Spectre x360 14, 或 雷蛇Blade Stealth.由于SX14只使用了一个小风扇,而其他许多旗舰超极本则使用了两个风扇,所以风扇的噪音也明显大了起来。
2021年的机型也放弃了2019年版本的一些功能。传统的VGA、SD读卡器和4K面板选项在这个最新版本中都被放弃了。
最高端的酷睿i7 SKU比最低端的非触控酷睿i5 SKU贵两倍(2500美元对1250美元),尽管两者都配有相同的1080p显示屏。对于大多数家庭或办公室用户来说,即使是入门级的酷睿i5选项,在性能方面也可能是一个值得尊敬的选择,可以与戴尔、惠普、联想或微软的流行专业消费机型相抗衡。
价格和可用性
2021年Vaio SX14是。根据配置不同,起价1250美元至2500美元,由制造商直接发货。截至本文撰写时,该机型尚未通过其他主要在线零售商广泛销售。
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K
- 11/03/2021 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo