联想超薄7 Pro X笔记本电脑评测。华硕VivoBook 14的替代品
在几个月前回顾了由英特尔驱动的联想Slim 7i Pro X之后,我们现在准备看看它的AMD同等产品,即由Ryzen 9 6900HS CPU而不是Core i7-12700H驱动的联想Slim 7 Pro X。除此之外,其他几乎所有的东西都保持不变,包括14.5英寸3K触摸屏,55WGeForce RTX 3050 GPU,以及整体机箱设计。我们建议查看我们的 对英特尔型号的现有评论以了解更多关于笔记本电脑的物理特性。
目前的AMD SKU包括Ryzen 7 6800H或Ryzen 9 6900HS CPU,配备高达2TB的PCIe4存储或32GB的焊接内存。整个产品系列固定使用相同的显示屏和Nvidia GPU。价格从1100美元开始,到我们的全配置评测单元的1500美元。
Slim 7 Pro或Slim 7i Pro的替代品包括其他中高档14英寸笔记本电脑,如戴尔Inspiron 14 Plus 7420,MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo, 华硕VivoBook S14, 或Acer Swift X 14.
更多联想评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.9 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2023 | Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 R9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.6 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.50" | 3072x1920 | |
87.7 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2022 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.5 kg | 18 mm | 14.50" | 3072x1920 | |
86.6 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 i7-1280P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
89.4 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 R7 7736U, Radeon 680M | 1.5 kg | 18.3 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
87.2 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.7 kg | 18.87 mm | 14.00" | 2240x1400 | |
86.1 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳--比大多数14英寸笔记本电脑更薄,配有GeForce RTX显卡
沟通
我们的AMD设备配备了Realtek RTL8852BE Wi-Fi 6模块,而不是更快的Intel AX211 Wi-Fi 6E。性能稳定,但即使在我们的Netgear AXE11000路由器上进行多次重新测试后,性能还是慢了一半。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
网络摄像头
200万像素的网络摄像头使用了电子快门,而不是物理快门。红外线是支持你好的标准。
维护
底部面板仅由5颗T5 Torx螺钉固定,便于维修。用户可以在焊接RAM的同时拆除SSD、WLAN和电池模块。
配件和保修
除了交流电适配器和文件外,零售盒中没有其他额外的东西。如果在美国购买,通常有一年的制造商有限保修。
显示器 - 非游戏玩家的G-Sync和MUX
联想为Slim 7i Pro X和Slim 7 Pro X采用了相同的CSOT T3 MNE507ZA1-1 IPS面板,因此两款机型的观看体验基本上是相同的。该面板支持大多数高端功能,包括原生120赫兹刷新率、全sRGB覆盖、G-Sync、触摸屏和低蓝光排放。黑白响应时间仍然相对较慢,因此这款笔记本电脑并不适合玩快速移动的游戏。如果OLED是你喜欢的更快的响应时间和更深的色彩,那么你就得考虑瑜伽瘦身9代替,因为Slim 7 Pro X系列没有这样的选择。
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 426.5 cd/m²
Contrast: 1422:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.07 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.63
ΔE Greyscale 3.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
67.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 CSOT T3 MNE507ZA1-1, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE MNE507ZA1-1, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP Envy 14-eb0252ng BOE0929, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 InfoVision 140NWHE, IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT AU Optronics B140QAN04.R, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -2% | 32% | 3% | 3% | 25% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 66 | 65.7 0% | 99.61 51% | 69.3 5% | 68.8 4% | 97.8 48% |
sRGB Coverage | 98.5 | 92.1 -6% | 99.98 2% | 98.5 0% | 99.3 1% | 99.9 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.7 | 67.7 0% | 97.18 44% | 70.4 4% | 69.5 3% | 85.9 27% |
Response Times | 21% | 94% | 15% | 22% | 54% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42.8 ? | 35 ? 18% | 2 ? 95% | 44.9 ? -5% | 32.8 ? 23% | 16.9 ? 61% |
Response Time Black / White * | 28.7 ? | 22 ? 23% | 2 ? 93% | 18.9 ? 34% | 22.8 ? 21% | 15.4 ? 46% |
PWM Frequency | 357 ? | |||||
Screen | 27% | 105% | -12% | -11% | -33% | |
Brightness middle | 426.5 | 430 1% | 361 -15% | 451 6% | 331.1 -22% | 496.7 16% |
Brightness | 414 | 408 -1% | 365 -12% | 439 6% | 326 -21% | 468 13% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 85 -3% | 93 6% | 92 5% | 85 -3% | 87 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.29 3% | 0.02 93% | 0.31 -3% | 0.29 3% | 0.3 -0% |
Contrast | 1422 | 1483 4% | 18050 1169% | 1455 2% | 1142 -20% | 1656 16% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.07 | 0.7 66% | 2.91 -41% | 2.46 -19% | 2.23 -8% | 3.93 -90% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.76 | 1.3 73% | 5.17 -9% | 4.24 11% | 5.44 -14% | 7.9 -66% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.63 | 0.4 37% | 2.32 -268% | 1.32 -110% | 0.63 -0% | 1.27 -102% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 1.3 59% | 2.58 19% | 3.5 -9% | 3.6 -13% | 5.9 -84% |
Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.22 99% | 2.4 92% | 2.24 98% | 2.21 100% | 2.04 108% |
CCT | 6142 106% | 6526 100% | 6123 106% | 7289 89% | 6022 108% | 7618 85% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 15% /
20% | 77% /
88% | 2% /
-5% | 5% /
-3% | 15% /
-8% |
* ... smaller is better
联想宣传的是预校准的显示器,因此我们的X-Rite色度计显示出相当好的平均灰度和色彩DeltaE值,分别只有3.2和2.07。尽管如此,我们能够通过自己进一步校准显示器获得更好的结果;平均灰度和色彩DeltaE值将分别低至1.1和0.63。我们免费校准的ICM配置文件在上面供用户下载。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.5 ms rise | |
↘ 14.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
42.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.8 ms rise | |
↘ 23 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
只有在阴凉处,户外的能见度才算不错。400尼特的背光亮度不够,无法克服玻璃屏幕的大部分眩光。
业绩
测试条件
在运行以下任何基准测试之前,我们通过联想Vantage将我们的设备设置为极限性能模式,并通过Windows设置为性能模式。此外,我们确保通过Nvidia控制面板启用独立GPU模式。该系统支持MUX或Advanced Optimus,尽管它在技术上不是一台游戏笔记本电脑。
处理器--与酷睿i7相差无几
多线程性能比我们数据库中配备相同设备的普通笔记本电脑慢5%左右。 Ryzen 9 6900HSCPU。这种差距可能很小,但它足以使我们的AMD CPU落后于 酷睿i7-12700H英特尔Slim 7i Pro X中的酷睿i7-12700H落后约5%至10%。
配置下来,较慢的 Ryzen 7 6800HSKU,根据我们对Ryzen 9 6900HS的体验,预计会对性能再产生5%到10%的影响。华硕ROG Zephyrus G14.
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (14212 - 16072, n=5) | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (90523 - 102881, n=5) | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (3035 - 3614, n=5) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (97461 - 105203, n=5) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (12548 - 13039, n=5) | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (49657 - 56486, n=5) | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (51791 - 142686, n=5) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (737 - 888, n=5) | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (7530 - 8981, n=5) | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (25757 - 30291, n=5) | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 |
系统性能
PCMark 10的结果一直落后于英特尔Slim 7i Pro X,平均约为10%。这可能是由于与我们的Ryzen CPU相比,英特尔的CPU速度更快,正如上面的基准测试所显示的。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 |
PCMark 10 Score | 6231 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (49150 - 51517, n=5) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (43646 - 51838, n=5) | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (15975 - 55235, n=5) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (79.2 - 110.9, n=5) | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon揭示了在打开我们的主页的多个浏览器标签时的DPC问题。此外,在60 FPS下的4K视频播放并不完美,甚至在多次重测后还有一些掉帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 只有一个驱动器
我们的测试设备配备了一个1TB 三星PM9A1PCIe4 x4 NVMe SSD,而不是英特尔Slim 7 X Pro上的Micron 3400。尽管如此,我们可以再次观察到性能节流,如下图所示。最大传输率将稳定在6600MB/s左右,只有一分钟左右的时间,然后下降到3300MB/s,表明散热不足。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能 - 55 WGeForce RTX 3050 GPU
的 移动GeForce RTX 3050根据3DMark,我们的设备与英特尔Slim 7i Pro X中的相同GPU相比,性能在个位数百分比之内。尽管如此,在运行《GTA V》或《最终幻想15》等实际游戏时,英特尔版本领先5-15%,这可能是由于Core i7-12700H CPU稍快。在游戏时,你肯定会从英特尔Slim 7i Pro X中挤出更多的性能。
3DMark 11 Performance | 15683 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 42159 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 10654 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4779 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 165.1 | 159.4 | 112.7 | 54.8 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 224.1 | 132.8 | 80.6 | 44 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 124.9 | 112.2 | 111.4 | 104.8 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 108.1 | 54.9 | 39.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 96.5 | 84.3 | 67.1 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 248 | 115.2 | 92.8 | 80.4 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 57.3 | 45.9 | 34.2 | 27.5 |
排放
系统噪音
风扇噪音取决于联想的三种电源配置。极限性能、智能冷却和节省电池。在智能冷却模式下浏览网页或流媒体视频时,双内部风扇通常非常安静。在这种情况下,风扇噪音约为24至26分贝(A),而静音背景为23分贝(A)。
运行更高的负载,如3DMark 06,在第一个基准场景之后,风扇噪音会达到37.4 dB(A)。如果循环运行该场景,风扇噪音将稳定在近42分贝(A)。如果是游戏,风扇噪音可能在42至48 dB(A)之间,这与我们在英特尔型号上观察到的情况接近。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.3 / 23.3 / 23.3 dB(A) |
Load |
| 37.4 / 47.7 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.2 dB(A) |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1280P, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZAL41T0HBLB | HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -10% | -11% | -2% | -8% | 5% | |
off / environment * | 23.2 | 24.6 -6% | 26 -12% | 26 -12% | 23.2 -0% | 23.3 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.3 | 24.6 -6% | 26 -12% | 26 -12% | 23.2 -0% | 23.3 -0% |
Idle Average * | 23.3 | 24.6 -6% | 26 -12% | 27 -16% | 23.2 -0% | 23.3 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.3 | 24.6 -6% | 28.2 -21% | 31 -33% | 23.2 -0% | 23.3 -0% |
Load Average * | 37.4 | 45.1 -21% | 43.6 -17% | 32 14% | 47.5 -27% | 24 36% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.7 | 49.1 -18% | 33 21% | 51.7 -24% | 35.6 15% | |
Load Maximum * | 47.7 | 50.4 -6% | 43.5 9% | 36 25% | 51.7 -8% | 55.8 -17% |
* ... smaller is better
温度 - 暖手器
由于超薄的外形、H系列CPU和独立的GeForce RTX GPU的组合,表面温度可能相当高。当处于负载状态时,顶部和底部的热点可以分别达到42摄氏度和50摄氏度,而戴尔Inspiron 14 Plus 7420的温度仅为40摄氏度和37摄氏度。戴尔Inspiron 14 Plus 7420在类似条件下,只有40℃和37℃。联想的热点在笔记本的键盘中心和后部,手掌和皮肤不太可能长时间接触。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.4 °C / 84.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-0.6 °C / -1.1 F).
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 Intel Core i7-1280P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -2% | -1% | 5% | 11% | 16% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 41.6 | 48 -15% | 42.8 -3% | 41 1% | 40 4% | 44.2 -6% |
Maximum Bottom * | 49.2 | 50.2 -2% | 41.8 15% | 43 13% | 36.4 26% | 45.8 7% |
Idle Upper Side * | 29.8 | 27.7 7% | 32.7 -10% | 29 3% | 27 9% | 19.6 34% |
Idle Bottom * | 31.2 | 30.1 4% | 32.6 -4% | 30 4% | 29.2 6% | 22 29% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当在Prime95压力下,CPU时钟速率和电路板功耗将分别提升到4.1 GHz和65 W,持续10秒左右。然后,处理器将最终稳定在3.8 GHz和54 W,以保持88 C的核心Tctl/Tdie温度。因此,由于温度限制,Slim 7 Pro X的最大提升时钟速率是短暂的。在配备酷睿i7-12700H的戴尔Inspiron 14 Plus 7420上进行同样的测试,相比之下,稳定的核心温度为80 C。
运行时的GPU时钟速率、温度和耗电量 Witcher 3将分别稳定在1492兆赫、78摄氏度和49瓦,而上述戴尔机型则为1590兆赫、74摄氏度和50瓦。联想的处理器在负载下运行时温度较高,这部分解释了上述测量的整体表面温度较高。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 43 | 40 |
Prime95压力 | 3.7 | -- | 88 | 60 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 2.1 | 1207 | 77 | 78 |
Witcher 3 应力 | 1.9 | 1492 | 77 | 78 |
发言人
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
消耗功率
尽管我们的Ryzen 9 CPU比Core i7-12700H慢,但在运行要求不高的负载时,总体功耗比Intel Slim 7 Pro X略高。否则,当运行更高的负载(如游戏)时,该系统也同样需要使用小型(约10.7 x 5.6 x 2.7厘米)100瓦交流适配器的80至90瓦。有趣的是,消耗量明显低于戴尔Inspiron 14 Plus 7420,可能是因为后者配备了更高容量的130 W交流适配器,用于更高的功率上限。
Off / Standby | 0.42 / 0.64 Watt |
Idle | 7.4 / 11 / 15 Watt |
Load |
81.6 / 105.6 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 R9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 i7-1280P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZAL41T0HBLB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP Envy 14-eb0252ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N, IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 5% | -9% | 46% | -13% | 29% | |
Idle Minimum * | 7.4 | 7.1 4% | 11.8 -59% | 4 46% | 6.3 15% | 5.4 27% |
Idle Average * | 11 | 10.8 2% | 17.4 -58% | 5 55% | 10.3 6% | 9.5 14% |
Idle Maximum * | 15 | 11.6 23% | 22.4 -49% | 9 40% | 20 -33% | 12.4 17% |
Load Average * | 81.6 | 84.8 -4% | 53 35% | 35 57% | 106.2 -30% | 54.7 33% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 90 | 91.3 -1% | 52.6 42% | 38.7 57% | 96.1 -7% | 52 42% |
Load Maximum * | 105.6 | 100.8 5% | 71 33% | 87 18% | 136.5 -29% | 63.4 40% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命 - 稍微短一些
WLAN的运行时间比英特尔的版本短了大约一个小时,尽管它们的电池容量相似,都是70Wh。竞争对手戴尔Inspiron 14 Plus 7420的运行时间也更长,超过7小时,而联想的运行时间为6小时,尽管戴尔的电池容量较小,为64Wh。
从空电到满电需要不到90分钟。请注意,如果运行游戏等高要求的负载,充电速度会变慢,因为100瓦的交流适配器对CPU和GPU来说都是勉强够用。
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 R9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 70 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 70 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 i7-1280P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 75 Wh | HP Envy 14-eb0252ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 63.3 Wh | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 64 Wh | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 72 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 24% | 20% | 126% | 23% | 41% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 351 | 434 24% | 422 20% | 792 126% | 432 23% | 494 41% |
H.264 | 532 | 504 | ||||
Load | 92 | 94 | 54 | 114 | ||
Reader / Idle | 712 | 1324 |
Pros
Cons
结论--针对价格、便携性和性能进行了优化
的 英特尔版本这款笔记本电脑包括更快的无线局域网,稍快的性能,更长的电池寿命,以及支持Thunderbolt 4。它的售价也比AMD版本高得多,为400至500美元。如果这些功能对你来说并不重要,那么价格较低的AMD版本就足够了,特别是它仍然提供同样高质量的3K触摸屏和GeForce RTX 3050图形。
Slim 7 Pro X是那些希望拥有超极本外形、H系列性能和专用RTX显卡的用户的理想选择,其价格仅超过1100美元。
当与流行的 华硕Vivobook 14系列相比,联想的机型缺乏OLED选项,但尽管它的外形更薄,但机箱有更强、更高级的感觉。经常旅行的内容创作者和编辑将最欣赏实惠的Slim 7 Pro X的平衡性能和便携性。
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7
- 04/16/2023 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.