华硕VivoBook S 14X S5402Z评论。世界上第一台14.5英寸2.8K 120 Hz OLED笔记本电脑
与高端的Zenbook系列不同,Vivobook系列针对的是预算和中端市场,其配置和功能更注重价格。然而,Vivobook S 14X的独特之处在于,它集成了其他Vivobook机型所没有的相对高端的硬件功能,包括其14.5英寸的外形尺寸、120赫兹的OLED显示屏、大部分铝制机箱和12代酷睿H系列CPU。这样抢眼的选择很容易让人与Zenbook机型擦肩而过。在这次审查中,我们将试图找出任何削减的角落,并对有前途的硬件能有多好的表现进行基准测试。
我们审查的配置配备了14.5英寸2.8K(2880 x 1800)120赫兹OLED显示屏,Core i7-12700H CPU,12GB混合内存(焊接+可移动),以及512GB PCIe3存储,零售价约1000美元。更少的SKU存在酷睿i5-12500H,但它们都配有相同的2.8K 16:10显示屏。
14.5英寸Vivobook S 14X的替代品包括14.0英寸机型,如联想IdeaPad 3 14,华为MateBook 14, HP Envy 14,或Pavilion Plus 14。请注意,这些机型中的许多都配备了较慢的U系列CPU,而我们的Vivobook则配备了H系列选项。
更多华硕的评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.1 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.50" | 2880x1800 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.5 kg | 19 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
79.2 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE Celeron 6305, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | 1.4 kg | 19.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
87.6 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.3 kg | 14.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
86.9 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2022 | Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD R5 5500U, Vega 7 | 1.5 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2160x1440 | |
86.5 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2021 | HP Envy 14-eb0010nr i5-1135G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | 1.6 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例--经典的新设计
Vivobook机型通常不像价格较高的Zenbook那样豪华或坚固,但这款Vivobook S 14X也许是该系列中最接近的。金属设计看起来和感觉上都比老款的Vivobook S13质量要高。 笔记本S13或 Vivobook 14相比之下,它们现在似乎已经过时了。有趣的是,华硕已经放弃了前几代Vivobook设计中的ErgoLift铰链,而采用了更标准的盖子,可以完全打开180度。
Vivobook机箱最薄弱的部分是其显示屏。虽然有光泽,但它没有使用通常能强化屏幕和盖子的边对边玻璃。因此,与Zenbook Flip 14上较硬的盖子相比,我们的Vivobook上的盖子更容易扭曲和弯曲。 HP Spectre x360 14或 戴尔XPS 13- 所有这些都有边缘到边缘的玻璃加固。笔记本电脑的底座比盖子更坚固,更耐翘曲。我们在16英寸的 Vivobook Pro 16X它采用了与我们的Vivobook S 14X非常相似的设计语言。
在尺寸和重量方面,我们的Vivobook只是比许多14英寸的替代品稍大和重一些,因为它的14.5英寸16:10屏幕尺寸稍大。例如,14.0英寸的Matebook 14要轻100克左右,长度和宽度要小7到15毫米。在这方面,额外的0.5英寸的屏幕空间并不是免费的。
连接性 - 双雷电4端口
对于一个14英寸的外形尺寸来说,端口选项是非常好的。用户不仅得到了全尺寸的HDMI和两个USB-A端口,而且该系统还集成了两个Thunderbolt 4端口,甚至比戴尔XPS 13的对接能力更强。主要问题是端口定位,因为沿右边缘的端口挤得太紧了。沿着左侧边缘的USB-A端口只有2.0。
沟通
英特尔AX211的标准配置是Wi-Fi 6E和蓝牙5.2连接。当连接到我们的6GHz网络时,我们经历了稳定的传输速率和没有配对问题。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
网络摄像头
相机质量是典型的720p,质量和色彩都很差。没有红外或Windows Hello支持。
维护
底部面板由10颗T5 Torx螺丝固定,没有一颗隐藏在橡胶脚垫下,便于拆卸。用户可以直接使用单个DDR4 SODIMM插槽、M.2 2230 WLAN模块和M.2 2280存储插槽,而不需要破坏任何保修贴纸。
配件和保修
除了交流电适配器和文件外,盒子里没有其他额外的东西。如果在美国购买,则适用标准的一年有限保修。
输入设备
键盘
与联想IdeaPad或戴尔Inspiron相比,键盘打字更舒适,因为这里的按键在按下时有更清晰、更令人满意的反馈。由于反馈更强,所以咔哒声比平时大一些。
触摸板
点击板(13 x 7.5 厘米)比 IdeaPad 5 Pro 14(10.5 x 7 cm) 或 戴尔 Inspiron 14 7420(11.5 x 8 cm),对于14英寸的外形尺寸来说是非常宽敞的。牵引力比周围的掌托更平稳,只有在以较慢的速度滑行时才有明显的粘性,便于点击。然而,光滑的哑光塑料表面的一个关键缺点是,随着时间的推移,它容易出现难看的指纹堆积。银色的底盘选项可能能够更好地隐藏指纹。
不幸的是,点击键盘时的反馈很弱,而且行程很浅,体验不令人满意。这种属性在没有专用鼠标按钮的中档或廉价超极本中很常见。如果有的话,肯定建议使用外部鼠标。
显示屏 - 超平滑120赫兹OLED
14.5英寸的Vivobook S 14X配备了与14.5英寸的三星ATNA45AF01-0 OLED面板完全相同的高质量面板。 Zenbook Pro 14 Duo.因此,这两款机型具有相似的属性和观看体验,包括120赫兹的原生刷新率、深黑色水平、完整的DCI-P3色彩范围、几乎即时的黑白响应时间,以及极其均匀的亮度分布。两者甚至共享相同的240赫兹的闪烁频率,在所有亮度水平上都存在。MyAsus软件包括减少闪烁强度的工具,但它们都涉及以某种方式调暗面板。如果你的眼睛对屏幕上的闪烁很敏感,那么最好避免在高亮度水平上使用笔记本电脑。
说到亮度水平,华硕宣传的最大亮度为600尼特。然而,制造商没有明确说明的是,只有在HDR模式下播放HDR媒体时才能达到这一最高等级。否则,最大亮度将被限制在~370尼特。如果你的任务、应用程序或游戏只支持SDR,那么你将无法达到600尼特的最高等级。因此,该广告可能有点误导性。
目前在市场上,除了这两款华硕Vivobook和Zenbook型号之外,没有其他14英寸笔记本电脑采用120赫兹OLED面板。除了不可避免的闪烁之外,这些OLED面板提供了一些次笔记本类别中最好的画面质量。
|
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 373 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.26 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Samsung ATNA45AF01-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.5" | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T SAMSUNG: SDC4171, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE AU Optronics B140HAN04.E, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 LEN140WQ+, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD TV140WTM-NH0, IPS, 2160x1440, 14" | HP Envy 14-eb0010nr AU Optronics AUOF392, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -0% | -56% | -13% | -23% | -14% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 99.41 0% | 36.6 -63% | 77.7 -22% | 65.9 -34% | 77.1 -23% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.94 0% | 54.7 -45% | 100 0% | 92.8 -7% | 99.8 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 95.5 | 94.79 -1% | 37.8 -60% | 78.4 -18% | 68.2 -29% | 76.7 -20% |
Response Times | -154% | -4314% | -3191% | -4279% | -6392% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.73 ? | 3 ? -311% | 44 ? -5927% | 35.2 ? -4722% | 43.2 ? -5818% | 61.2 ? -8284% |
Response Time Black / White * | 1 ? | 3 ? -200% | 28 ? -2700% | 17.6 ? -1660% | 28.4 ? -2740% | 46 ? -4500% |
PWM Frequency | 240.4 ? | 360 50% | ||||
Screen | 16% | -101% | -23% | 8% | 1% | |
Brightness middle | 373 | 384 3% | 368 -1% | 469 26% | 457 23% | 412 10% |
Brightness | 375 | 385 3% | 332 -11% | 445 19% | 451 20% | 392 5% |
Brightness Distribution | 99 | 98 -1% | 83 -16% | 90 -9% | 93 -6% | 81 -18% |
Black Level * | 0.07 | 0.47 | 0.26 | 0.32 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.26 | 1.75 23% | 6.14 -172% | 3.5 -55% | 1.9 16% | 1.88 17% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.22 | 3.41 45% | 17.76 -186% | 5.3 15% | 3.1 50% | 3.06 51% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 1.06 24% | 4.44 -217% | 3.3 -136% | 2.2 -57% | 2.2 -57% |
Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.39 92% | 2.73 81% | 1.97 112% | 2.14 103% | 2.1 105% |
CCT | 6417 101% | 6440 101% | 5979 109% | 6512 100% | 6921 94% | 6650 98% |
Contrast | 5486 | 783 | 1758 | 1288 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.32 | 1.7 | 1.96 | |||
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 68.7 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.8 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -46% /
-30% | -1490% /
-854% | -1076% /
-597% | -1431% /
-780% | -2135% /
-1165% |
* ... smaller is better
华硕宣传的是Pantone验证的显示器,意味着根据DCI-P3标准的准确色彩。我们能够用X-Rite色度计独立地确认准确的颜色,因为平均DeltaE值确实非常低。然而,在所有测试的颜色中,红色似乎偏差最大,DeltaE为7.68,大约是平均值的3到4倍。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.5 ms rise | |
↘ 0.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.73 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.37 ms rise | |
↘ 0.36 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240.4 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
由于光泽覆盖和适度的亮度,在大多数情况下,户外能见度不是很高。由于大多数内容都是SDR而不是HDR,用户在大多数情况下只能得到约370尼特的亮度,而不是600尼特的最大值。你会想尽可能在阴凉处工作,以减少眩光。
可视角度比IPS宽,因为OLED面板在极端角度下不会出现同样的灰度退化。然而,独特的彩虹效应仍然存在,就像Zenbook Flip 15的OLED显示屏上的那样。 Zenbook Flip 15.
性能 - 英特尔第12代酷睿H处理器
测试条件
在进行基准测试之前,我们通过Windows和MyAsus软件将我们的设备设置为性能模式,以获得尽可能高的分数。建议用户熟悉华硕软件,因为与性能、电池、显示和更新有关的关键功能都在这里切换。
处理器
CPU的性能是一个混合包。当与配备相同的普通笔记本电脑相比 Core i7-12700HCPU相比,我们的Vivobook S 14X的处理器慢了大约20%。然而,当与其他类似尺寸的运行在酷睿U系列CPU上的14英寸超极本相比,我们的华硕明显更快。这款 酷睿i7-1165G7例如,Zenbook 14中的酷睿i7-1165G7在多线程工作负载中慢了50%,如果比较运行在第十代Ice Lake 或Comet Lake-U CPU上的机型,差异会变得更大。因此,虽然这里的酷睿i7-12700H肯定会更快,但对于14英寸的外形尺寸,它可以说已经非常快了。
这种相同的酷睿i7-12700H CPU可以在许多超薄游戏笔记本电脑上找到,如申克XMG Neo 15来了解Vivobook S 14X的性能有多大。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2585 - 17957, n=62) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12439 - 90760, n=62) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (833 - 4242, n=62) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (57923 - 103202, n=62) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (3249 - 9939, n=62) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (7135 - 44760, n=62) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (31839 - 144360, n=62) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (305 - 1171, n=62) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1437 - 9692, n=62) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12863 - 52207, n=62) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
系统性能
PCMark的结果通常高于其他由U系列CPU驱动的14英寸超极本,但差距不大。虽然酷睿i7-12700H在纸面上要比任何U系列替代品快得多,但在实践中,大多数日常应用的整体响应速度只是略快。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5541 - 6281, n=7) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10569 - 11699, n=7) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6690 - 8038, n=7) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6207 - 7401, n=7) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1492 - 1907, n=7) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1499 - 1832, n=7) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1507 - 2016, n=7) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1384 - 1831, n=7) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
PCMark 10 Score | 5726 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (25615 - 80511, n=62) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (25586 - 79442, n=62) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (23679 - 88660, n=62) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (76.2 - 133.9, n=60) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示,在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时,以及在运行Prime95压力仅几秒钟时,DPC问题。在60FPS下的4K视频播放是顺畅的,没有丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的设备配备了512GB 美光MTFDKBA512TFKPCIe3 x4 NVMe固态硬盘,连续读取和写入速度分别为3500 MB/s和3000 MB/s。它是目前速度较快的PCIe3 x4 NVMe固态硬盘之一,与中端Vivobook品牌搭配良好。在我们的设备中,该驱动器在长时间的压力下没有表现出任何问题,可以保持最大的传输速率。
微星 MSI Pulse GL66游戏笔记本电脑配备了完全相同的512GB美光2450固态硬盘。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能
集成的 Iris Xe 96 EUs在我们的测试装置中返回令人失望的结果,比我们数据库中的Iris Xe 96 EUs的平均速度慢30%。这种性能缺陷通常发生在RAM速度慢和/或运行在单通道模式而不是双通道模式时。我们的设备的不对称内存配置(4GB可移动+8GB焊接)可能是造成GPU性能相对较差的罪魁祸首。虽然在低于1080p的设置下可以进行一些轻度游戏,但它不应该是这款Vivobook的主要应用。
原始的GPU性能仍然明显快于老得多的 UHD Graphics 620在英特尔第十代CPU系列之前的超极本上很常见。
3DMark 11 Performance | 6344 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 15626 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2922 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1143 points | |
Help |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (13 - 25.9, n=42) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10.8 - 21.7, n=37) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
1920x1080 High Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9.8 - 16.9, n=34) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (7.4 - 16.8, n=32) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 78.1 | 51.9 | 11.8 | 4.24 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 67.5 | 39.6 | 17.8 | 9.6 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 106.4 | 74.6 | 43.2 | 40 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 28.2 | 14.3 | 10.6 | 7.31 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 48.7 | 38.8 | 34.9 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 77.4 | 26.2 | 22.2 | 17.9 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 14.6 | 11.7 | 9.8 | 8 |
排放
系统噪音 - 负载下声音大
风扇噪音比大多数采用U系列的超极本要大,更接近于采用独立显卡的机型,如 羡慕14或Vivobook Pro 14。例如,当在平衡模式下运行3DMark 06以代表平均负载时,风扇噪音将高达43 dB(A),而在联想IdeaPad 3 14或Matebook 14上分别只有27 dB(A)或32 dB(A)。风扇行为在很大程度上取决于通过MyAsus的三个风扇配置文件(Whisper、Balanced和Performance),因此如果浏览网页或视频流,我们推荐Whisper模式。否则,在要求不高的负载下,风扇会在23至27 dB(A)或更高的范围内频繁跳动。
当在平衡模式下游戏时,风扇噪音将在39至43 dB(A)之间循环。如果设置为性能模式,风扇的噪音会明显增大,达到53 dB(A)。正如我们下面的压力测试部分所显示的那样,性能模式对于从CPU中提取更多能量是必要的。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.2 / 23.2 / 27.2 dB(A) |
Load |
| 43.2 / 52.8 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 22.7 dB(A) |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ | Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, Celeron 6305, SK Hynix BC711 HFM128GD3HX015N | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD Vega 7, R5 5500U, Phison PS5013 311CD0512GB | HP Envy 14-eb0010nr GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -13% | 5% | 8% | 12% | 4% | |
off / environment * | 22.7 | 25.4 -12% | 25.4 -12% | 23.7 -4% | 24.1 -6% | 25.9 -14% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.2 | 25.4 -9% | 25.4 -9% | 23.7 -2% | 24.1 -4% | 26 -12% |
Idle Average * | 23.2 | 25.4 -9% | 25.4 -9% | 25.1 -8% | 24.1 -4% | 26 -12% |
Idle Maximum * | 27.2 | 30.9 -14% | 25.4 7% | 25.1 8% | 24.1 11% | 26 4% |
Load Average * | 43.2 | 56 -30% | 27.2 37% | 38.4 11% | 31.8 26% | 34.9 19% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 52.8 | 38.4 27% | 34.6 34% | 34.5 35% | ||
Load Maximum * | 52.8 | 56 -6% | 44.8 15% | 39.4 25% | 38.1 28% | 48.7 8% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
即使考虑到更强大的Core H系列CPU,表面温度也比预期的要低。当长时间运行压力负荷时,我们的华硕顶部和底部的热点可以分别达到37摄氏度和39摄氏度,而惠普Envy 14为41摄氏度和45摄氏度,或华为Matebook 14为43摄氏度和49摄氏度。 华为Matebook 14.掌托和前面的区域仍然比后面的区域凉爽。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.8 °C / 85.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1 °C / -1.8 F).
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE Intel Celeron 6305, Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -19% | -6% | -8% | -1% | -13% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 37.2 | 42.3 -14% | 38.6 -4% | 42.3 -14% | 42.8 -15% | 41.2 -11% |
Maximum Bottom * | 39.2 | 49.6 -27% | 41 -5% | 52.8 -35% | 48.8 -24% | 45.6 -16% |
Idle Upper Side * | 30.4 | 34.2 -13% | 32.6 -7% | 27.1 11% | 25.2 17% | 31.8 -5% |
Idle Bottom * | 31.6 | 37.9 -20% | 33.9 -7% | 29.1 8% | 25.9 18% | 37.8 -20% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当CPU在Prime95下受到压力时,时钟频率会在几秒钟内提升到4GHz,然后迅速达到94C的核心温度。然后性能和温度会分别稳步下降到3GHz和84C,最后甚至进一步节流到1.3至2.3GHz,如下图所示。在测试开始时,CPU封装功率将高达80W,然后由于热限制,最终在27W和49W之间循环。温度可以达到90摄氏度以上,这明显比像惠普Envy 14这样的机型更热。 HP Envy 14或 RazerBlade Stealth在类似条件下的温度。这可能是将酷睿H系列CPU装入超极本尺寸机箱的后果。
当运行在性能或平衡模式时,GPU的时钟频率和温度将分别稳定在1397 MHz和78 C。 Witcher 3在性能或平衡模式下运行时,GPU的时钟频率和温度将分别稳定在1397 MHz和78 C。这些温度比我们在其他采用酷睿U处理器的14英寸超极本上观察到的温度还要高,包括 ZenBook 14 UX425E.请注意,CPU封装功率将从平衡模式下的35W跃升至性能模式下的45W,这意味着用户应该在性能模式下运行,以便在需要时从处理器中榨取更多性能。
用电池运行限制了性能。在电池上进行的Fire Strike 测试将返回物理和图形分数,分别为11940和2698分,而在主电源上则为21078和3263分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(°C) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 36 |
Prime95压力 | 1.3 - 2.3 | - | 70 - 92 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 2.3 | 998 | 78 |
Witcher 3 压力(标准模式) | 0.8 | 1397 | 79 |
Witcher 3 应力(性能模式) | 0.9 | 1397 | 78 |
发言人
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理--高性能、高功率的需求
消耗功率
对于一个超薄的14英寸笔记本电脑来说,耗电量非常高。事实上,由于华硕内部的第12代酷睿H系列CPU要求较高,该系统配备了90W的交流适配器,而大多数替代品的功率为60W或更低。例如,当运行3DMark 06来代表平均负载时,我们的Vivobook将比在联想Yoga Slim 7i Pro上消耗大约50%和85%的电量。联想Yoga Slim 7i Pro和由AMD驱动的华为MateBook 14 2021相比,分别多出约50%和85%。由于CPU负载较高,在较低设置下进行游戏时,功耗可以达到类似水平。从酷睿i7-12700H获得的额外性能在这方面付出了巨大的代价。
在运行Prime95压力时,我们能够从小型(约7.5 x 7.5 x 2.8厘米)90瓦交流适配器中记录到93瓦的最大功耗。附带的适配器只是勉强够同时为笔记本电脑充电和在CPU全速运行。
Off / Standby | 0.34 / 0.58 Watt |
Idle | 5.1 / 7.7 / 11 Watt |
Load |
73.9 / 93 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.5" | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE Celeron 6305, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, SK Hynix BC711 HFM128GD3HX015N, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD R5 5500U, Vega 7, Phison PS5013 311CD0512GB, IPS, 2160x1440, 14" | HP Envy 14-eb0010nr i5-1135G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -20% | 39% | 10% | 12% | -46% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.1 | 6.6 -29% | 3.7 27% | 5.6 -10% | 4.2 18% | 4.2 18% |
Idle Average * | 7.7 | 9.6 -25% | 7.1 8% | 9.3 -21% | 10.3 -34% | 18.3 -138% |
Idle Maximum * | 11 | 7.3 34% | 8.2 25% | 9.6 13% | 10.7 3% | 19.2 -75% |
Load Average * | 73.9 | 73 1% | 26 65% | 49 34% | 39.4 47% | 72.9 1% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.7 | 74.4 -74% | 24.3 43% | 38.2 11% | 38.7 9% | 61.5 -44% |
Load Maximum * | 93 | 119 -28% | 31.4 66% | 65.2 30% | 67.7 27% | 127.8 -37% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
70Wh的电池对于14英寸的笔记本电脑来说可能很大,但运行时间并不一定更长。我们能够记录下刚刚超过7小时的实际WLAN使用时间,比许多在酷睿U系列CPU上运行的替代品短几个小时。要求更高的酷睿H系列CPU和OLED面板是部分原因。
用附带的USB-C充电器从空到满的充电速度相对较快,为1到1.5小时。支持USB-C充电。
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 70 Wh | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 63 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE Celeron 6305, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, 38 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 61 Wh | Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD R5 5500U, Vega 7, 56 Wh | HP Envy 14-eb0010nr i5-1135G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, 63.3 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 11% | 1% | 22% | 32% | 82% | |
Reader / Idle | 787 | 687 -13% | 1661 111% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 425 | 569 34% | 429 1% | 517 22% | 563 32% | 649 53% |
Load | 112 | 61 | 90 | |||
H.264 | 643 | 551 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 所有关于OLED显示屏和快速的CPU性能
Vivobook S 14X是为那些希望最大限度地提高显示质量和处理器性能,同时尽可能保持低价格的用户准备的。如果你曾经想要一台次笔记本,但被U系列CPU的性能所拒绝,那么这款华硕就是为你设计的。原始的CPU性能优势超过了像联想Yoga 9 14或华为MateBook 14在这方面是非常重要的,甚至120赫兹的OLED面板也是我们迄今为止在次笔记本类别中所看到的任何东西都不一样。
缺点并不令人惊讶,而且与 Razer Blade 14.在一个小的外形尺寸中塞进这么多的性能,功耗和风扇噪音将不可避免地提高。Vivobook S 14X在运行要求较高的应用程序时可能会非常吵闹和耗电。
Vivobook S 14X最大限度地提高了CPU性能和显示质量,同时将价格控制在最低水平。一旦你体验了120赫兹的刷新率,就很难再回到60赫兹的OLED。
其他更小的挫折包括灵活的显示屏,一小部分用户可能会注意到的持续的屏幕闪烁,以及比平均水平更弱的Iris Xe性能。这款笔记本电脑的其余部分比预期的要好,因为它应该是一款经济实惠的中档蛤壳。
价格和可用性
截至目前,Vivobook S 14X还没有在亚马逊上销售。一些经销商如Costco目前有该机型的库存,价格为1100美元。
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z
- 08/30/2022 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo