星球大战外传》评测：笔记本电脑和台式机基准测试

来自另一个世界的图形渴望？

亡命之徒》在发布前受到了一些批评，但最终版本还是受到了相对较好的评价，至少在媒体上是这样。不过，正如我们的基准文章所指出的，星战迷们需要相当强大的硬件才能流畅地运行这款游戏。

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 09/04/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Laptop / Notebook Desktop Gamecheck

测试系统

我们在这些设备上进行了游戏基准测试。点击各种图片可进入相应生产商的网站。有关设备规格的更多详情，请参阅文章末尾。

技术

亡命之徒》采用育碧的 Snowdrop 引擎制作，其画面效果令人惊叹。这款动作冒险游戏虽然没有什么新突破，但在视听和细节内容方面有很多可圈可点之处。

虽然我们的测试是基于 1.1.1 补丁进行的，该补丁试图解决稳定性和显存问题，但仍存在一些技术问题。例如，启动和加载过程以及菜单更改可能会比平均速度慢，特别是在性能较弱的系统和/或使用外部存储设备时，即使是快速的 NVMe SSD。因此，我们在每台测试电脑上都安装了游戏。通过 "育碧连接 "运行，游戏需要的下载量略低于 50 GB，以现在的标准来看，既不算少也不算多。

由于数量众多，育碧将《亡命之徒》中的图形选项分为两个菜单，这一点值得称赞。视频选项卡包括分辨率和显示模式（我们使用的是 21:9 电影模式）以及各种升频选项等基本要素。Outlaws 支持从 FSR 到 DLSS 和 XeSS 的所有现代技术，并为兼容显卡提供了帧生成和光线重构功能。

图形选项卡，更具体地说是高级图形子菜单，提供了更多自定义功能。它有 20 多个独立设置，包括多个光线追踪设置。系统要求高的部分原因是光线追踪在每个质量级别都会自动启用，共有四种预设（低至超）。

更改后无需重新启动游戏，这是一个令人愉快的功能。此外，游戏还提供了 VRAM 显示，不过不同系统显示的数值会有很大差异。与育碧的一贯做法一样，菜单中包含有用的说明文字，有时还提供对比图片。在 AMD 和 Nvidia 之间的持续竞争中，我们的经验表明，Nvidia 在某些情况下往往表现得更好。此外，在中等分辨率和设置下，《亡命之徒》显然会受到 CPU 的限制。

基准

我们的基准测试在 "地下世界 Toshara "中进行，该区域在游戏进行约两小时后即可进入，对性能要求相当高。我们使用 CapframeX 工具录制了约 30 秒的固定路线，如下视频所示。我们认为 40 FPS 及以上的帧率已经很不错了；不过，无论硬件如何，《亡命之徒》偶尔还是会出现最低 FPS 偏低和异常卡顿的问题。

▶ load Youtube video

成果

全高清（1,920 x 1,080）

遗憾的是，这款游戏在集成 GPU 上几乎无法运行。无论是 Radeon 780M和弧 8都无法在测试中达到流畅的帧率，即使在最低设置下的 1280 x 720 分辨率下也是如此。而采用相当先进的中端 GPU 的性能则要好得多。例如 GeForce RTX 4050可以很好地处理 1,920 x 1,080 分辨率和 "高 "预设值。对于全高清的超预设，我们建议至少使用 RTX 4060.

Star Wars Outlaws
1920x1080 cinem. low 1920x1080 cinem. medium 1920x1080 cinem. high 1920x1080 cinem. ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	141 (76.7^min, 89.2^P0.1, 104.3^P1) fps ∼100% 137.5 (72.1^min, 86.4^P0.1, 103.8^P1) fps ∼100% 129.2 (61.2^min, 80.9^P0.1, 95.1^P1) fps ∼100% 115.5 (43.5^min, 69.5^P0.1, 82.1^P1) fps ∼100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Neo 16 E23	90.5 (15^min, 29.2^P0.1, 55.3^P1) fps ∼64% 88.7 (25.3^min, 31.7^P0.1, 54.5^P1) fps ∼65% 83 (31^min, 33.5^P0.1, 56.3^P1) fps ∼64% 76.2 (23.9^min, 37.1^P0.1, 50.5^P1) fps ∼66%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	85.4 (47.3^min, 52.4^P0.1, 60.8^P1) fps ∼61% 82.9 (3.99^min, 30.2^P0.1, 57.1^P1) fps ∼60% 78.2 (30.9^min, 48.8^P0.1, 56.9^P1) fps ∼61% 70.7 (32.1^min, 41.8^P0.1, 47.9^P1) fps ∼61%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX Razer Blade 16 Mid 23	70.9 (25.7^min, 34.2^P0.1, 42.7^P1) fps ∼50% 63.4 (24.4^min, 27.6^P0.1, 44.1^P1) fps ∼46% 61 (28^min, 32.9^P0.1, 42.1^P1) fps ∼47% 57.7 (34.3^min, 34.9^P0.1, 38.8^P1) fps ∼50%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	73.7 (31.1^min, 41.4^P0.1, 51.8^P1) fps ∼52% 69.9 (15.6^min, 34.5^P0.1, 50.3^P1) fps ∼51% 60 (35.1^min, 37^P0.1, 42.3^P1) fps ∼46% 52.8 (19.2^min, 31.6^P0.1, 37.6^P1) fps ∼46%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS Razer Blade 14 Mid 23	63.2 (19.6^min, 33.6^P0.1, 41.8^P1) fps ∼45% 57.6 (23.5^min, 34.9^P0.1, 42.7^P1) fps ∼42% 50.7 (23.2^min, 29.8^P0.1, 39^P1) fps ∼39% 41.3 (21.6^min, 23.1^P0.1, 31.7^P1) fps ∼36%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H Medion Erazer Scout E20	52.8 (30.2^min, 34.2^P0.1, 41.9^P1) fps ∼37% 49.5 (32.9^min, 33.1^P0.1, 39.7^P1) fps ∼36% 43.3 (25.3^min, 29^P0.1, 33.8^P1) fps ∼34% 35.1 (19^min, 20.5^P0.1, 27.5^P1) fps ∼30%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Ultra 7 155H Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14	16.5 (11.4^min, 12.7^P0.1, 14.2^P1) fps ∼12% 15.9 (8.96^min, 10.8^P0.1, 12.9^P1) fps ∼12% 13 (6.32^min, 6.68^P0.1, 10.4^P1) fps ∼10% 10.8 (5.98^min, 6.6^P0.1, 8.61^P1) fps ∼9%
AMD Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme	14 (4.79^min, 5.96^P0.1, 9.33^P1) fps ∼10% 12.1 (3.13^min, 3.38^P0.1, 8.31^P1) fps ∼9% 9.09 (0.3888^min, 0.509^P0.1, 2.32^P1) fps ∼7% 7.59 (0.799^min, 0.944^P0.1, 3.43^P1) fps ∼7%

QHD (2,560 x 1,440)

一般来说，QHD 显示屏用户需要高端 GPU。在分辨率为 2,560 x 1,440 的最高设置下，只有使用 GeForce RTX 4080.

Star Wars Outlaws
2560x1440 cinem. ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	84.9 (56.1^min, 62.5^P0.1, 68.5^P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	66 (37.7^min, 43.6^P0.1, 49.7^P1) fps ∼78%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Neo 16 E23	60.6 (25.8^min, 29.6^P0.1, 46.7^P1) fps ∼71%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX Razer Blade 16 Mid 23	43.3 (22^min, 22.7^P0.1, 29.5^P1) fps ∼51%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	37.1 (12^min, 22.7^P0.1, 29.3^P1) fps ∼44%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS Razer Blade 14 Mid 23	28 (21.4^min, 21.4^P0.1, 22.7^P1) fps ∼33%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H Medion Erazer Scout E20	23.4 (12.6^min, 14^P0.1, 18^P1) fps ∼28%

超高清（3,840 x 2,160）

即使是最强大的笔记本图形处理器，如 Nvidia 的顶级型号 GeForce RTX 4090在使用 Ultra 预设设置时，目前 3,840 x 2,160 像素的分辨率已经超负荷。一台塔式电脑配备RTX 4080或更高配置的塔式电脑才能达到最佳性能。不过，启用 DLSS 或 FSR 等升频技术后，使用移动 RTX 4080 也可播放这些设置。

Star Wars Outlaws
3840x2160 cinem. ultra 3840x2160 cinem. ultra DLSS 3840x2160 cinem. ultra FSR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	49.2 (39.3^min, 40^P0.1, 43.1^P1) fps ∼100% 77.4 (27.5^min, 55.5^P0.1, 63.4^P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	37.7 (24.5^min, 30.5^P0.1, 32.2^P1) fps ∼77% 59.2 (21.2^min, 38.3^P0.1, 47.5^P1) fps ∼100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Neo 16 E23	32.6 (26.1^min, 26.6^P0.1, 27.6^P1) fps ∼66% 53.6 (19.3^min, 37.8^P0.1, 44.8^P1) fps ∼69%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX Razer Blade 16 Mid 23	27.9 (13.7^min, 14.4^P0.1, 22.8^P1) fps ∼57% 40.4 (17.7^min, 23.4^P0.1, 28.7^P1) fps ∼52%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	18.1 (8.63^min, 10.7^P0.1, 12.8^P1) fps ∼37% 32.6 (12.2^min, 19.4^P0.1, 26.7^P1) fps ∼42%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS Razer Blade 14 Mid 23	15.1 (9.63^min, 10.1^P0.1, 13.1^P1) fps ∼31% 25.3 (10.2^min, 15.9^P0.1, 21.5^P1) fps ∼33%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H Medion Erazer Scout E20	9 (3^min) fps ∼18% 21.4 (8.65^min, 11.8^P0.1, 18^P1) fps ∼28%

Overview

Test system details

笔记本电脑	显卡	处理器	内存
XMG Neo 16 E23	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090 @175 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6X)	Intel Core i9-13900HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080 @175 W TGP (12 GB GDDR6X)	Intel Core i9-13950HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
XMG Pro 15 E23	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-13900HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4060 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2 x 8 GB DDR5
Medion Erazer Scout E20	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050 @100 W TGP (6 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-13700H	2 x 8 GB DDR5
联想 Yoga Pro 7 14	英特尔 Arc 8	英特尔酷睿 Ultra 7 155H	2 x 16 GB LPDDR5-7467
华硕 ROG Ally Z1 Extreme	AMD Radeon 780M	AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme	16 GB LPDDR5-6400

塔式电脑	显卡	处理器	内存
华硕 ROG Strix Z790-F	NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080 (16 GB GDDR6X) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT (20 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-13900K	2 x 24 GB DDR5 G.Skill

4K 显示器	操作系统	Nvidia 驱动程序	AMD 驱动程序	Intel 驱动程序
Philips Evnia 329M1RV	Windows 11	560.94	24.8.1	101.5972

Editor of the original article: Carmen Pol - Translator - 320 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 458020 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 星球大战外传》评测：笔记本电脑和台式机基准测试

Florian Glaser, 2024-09- 4 (Update: 2024-09- 4)

Legend
5	Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
	May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
	May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?	Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
	Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Pos	Model	< Prev Next > Star Wars Outlaws (2024)
Pos	Model	low 1920x1080 cinem. low	med. 1920x1080 cinem. medium	high 1920x1080 cinem. high	ultra 1920x1080 cinem. ultra	QHD DLSS 2560x1440 cinem. ultra DLSS	QHD FSR 2560x1440 cinem. ultra FSR	QHD 2560x1440 cinem. ultra	4K DLSS 3840x2160 cinem. ultra DLSS	4K FSR 3840x2160 cinem. ultra FSR	4K 3840x2160 cinem. ultra
4	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080	141	137.5	129.2	115.5			84.9	77.4		49.2
7	AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT	85.4	82.9	78.2	70.7			66		59.2	37.7
11	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	90.5	88.7	83	76.2			60.6	53.6		32.6
21	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	77.6ⁿ²	72.45ⁿ²	67.55ⁿ²	61.05ⁿ²		59.1	45.5ⁿ²	38.1ⁿ²		24.2ⁿ²
37	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	73.7	69.9	60	52.8			37.1	32.6		18.1
44	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	53.1	51.7	47.5	49.5	44.8		31.1
53	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	63.2	57.6	50.7	41.35ⁿ²	53.5		27.45ⁿ²	25.3		15.1
59	AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT			40.5	33.2			22.7
89	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	29.8	27.8	23.7	19.2	25.2		17.8
100*	Intel Arc A770M	42.8	40.9	35.1	29.5
147	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	52.8	49.5	43.3	35.1			23.4	21.4		9
202*	Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	16.5	15.9	13	10.8
210*	Intel Arc Graphics 130V	8.56	7.3
251*	AMD Radeon 880M	14.7	13.2	11.5	8.52
254*	AMD Radeon 780M	14	12.1	9.09	7.59
440*	AMD Radeon 740M	7.04	6.35	4.86	3.92