速度快、AI 能力强的智能手机：华硕 Zenfone 12 Ultra 评测
都开心吗？
华硕将其设计智能手机推向下一场战斗，并再次为其配备了顶级 SoC。此外，Zenfone 12 Ultra 还配备了众多人工智能工具。我们的评测阐明了即将推出的创新，并指出了任何停滞不前之处。Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
结论 - Zenfone 12 Ultra 显示出弱点
Zenfone 12 Ultra 是一款可靠的高端智能手机，配备了快速处理器、不错的摄像头和出色的电池续航能力。它还配备了快速充电和 eSIM 卡，并通过了 IP68 认证。
不过，更新时间较短和表面温度可能较高的缺点也很突出。希望华硕能在未来的更新中解决网状网络的问题。
Pros
Cons
- $14.95BoxWave Adapter Compatible with ASUS Zenfone 12 Ultra - USB-A to C PortChanger (5-Pack), USB Type-C OTG USB-A Convert Charging Data - Metallic Silver
- $7.99Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible for Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra Screen Protector Tempered Glass,Case Friendly [9H Hardness][High definition Anti Scratch]
Zenfone 12 Ultra 是华硕 Zenfone 11 Ultra 的继任者。 华硕 Zenfone 11 Ultra的继任者，基于目前最快的高通芯片组。它的重量也略有减轻，现在还提供 eSIM 支持和众多人工智能功能。
它的零售价为 1,099 欧元，并不便宜，必须与强劲的竞争对手竞争，如 Magic7 Pro, 像素 9 Pro XL或 Galaxy S25+.
规格华硕 Zenfone 12 Ultra
外壳和功能 - Zenfone 12 Ultra，配备大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2
与前代产品相比，华硕对 Zenfone 12 Ultra 的设计进行了小幅调整，缩小了摄像头驼峰的尺寸。不过，3.95 毫米的驼峰还是凸出了不少。做工令人印象深刻：缝隙紧密均匀，黑色版本（我们的测试样品）的磨砂铝边框不易沾染指纹。背面的玻璃也是磨砂的，但明显更容易沾染灰尘。正面由大猩猩 Victus 2 玻璃保护。
在功能方面，华硕在 Zenfone 12 Ultra 上保留了音频接口，在测试中证明噪音很低（信噪比：100.91 dBFS）。不过，它新增了 eSIM 支持。如果要使用，第二个 SIM 卡插槽将被停用。
通讯和操作 - 配备光学指纹传感器的华硕手机
华硕 Zenfone 12 Ultra 支持所有现代通信标准，如 5G Sub6、Wi-Fi 7、蓝牙 5.4 和 NFC。只有 UWB 无需使用。结合华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE 11000 参考路由器，这款智能手机实现了很高的数据传输速率，只有在 6 GHz 范围内传输时才会出现最初的下降。在日常使用中，我们的 Zenfone 遇到了网状系统的问题，它顽固地无视这些系统，只直接连接到路由器Fritz!Box 5690 Pro 。
Zenfone 的电容式触摸屏运行完美，滑动性能良好。没有贴保护膜。华硕提供了一个集成在显示屏中的光学指纹传感器，用于生物识别安全。该传感器工作可靠、快速。此外，还可通过前置摄像头进行安全性较低的面部识别。
电源按钮是一个所谓的智能按钮，可以进行配置：除了单按之外，它还可以为双击和长按分配不同的动作。
软件和可持续性 - 华硕只提供两种主要更新
Zenfone 12 Ultra 预装了谷歌Android 15，应该会收到两个主要的Android 更新。华硕已将安全补丁的覆盖范围延长至五年，考虑到价格区间，这仍然不算多。
华硕对人工智能功能进行了大幅升级，并推出了九项新功能。其中包括改进视频录制、生成式图像增强、Circle to Search、通话翻译以及各种文本摘要或翻译功能。其中一些功能仍处于测试阶段，使用起来还不太顺畅。
华硕尚未提供任何有关使用可回收原材料或智能手机二氧化碳排放量的信息。对于 11 Ultra的可持续发展报告https://esg.asus.com/en/resource/carbon_footprint?tabs=phone的可持续发展报告。华硕不打算让用户自己进行维修，因此没有提供说明书或备件。Zenfone 12 Ultra 包装在一个纸箱中，我们看不到任何塑料成分。
摄像头 - Zenfone 12 Ultra，配备 LYT-700
相机方面的变化不大。前置采用了相同的传感器，自拍效果不错，但只能拍摄全高清（30 FPS）视频。
后置三摄像头也基本没有变化。不过，Zenfone 12 Ultra 配备了较新的主传感器索尼 Lytia 700，并改进了云台防抖功能。从照片中也可以清楚地看到这一点。对比度变得更加清晰，成像性能似乎也比上一代产品更加和谐。不过，我们希望在近距离拍摄时能看到更多的细节和更鲜艳的色彩。
可录制 8k （30 帧/秒）视频。从超高清开始，可以达到每秒 60 帧。缺点是：强大的图像稳定功能仅适用于全高清。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide-angle5x ZoomLow-Light
显示屏 - 明亮的 OLED 显示屏，即使在黑暗中也清晰可见
Zenfone 12 Ultra 的 OLED 显示屏与前代产品相比保持不变，再次提供扩展的全高清分辨率。在游戏模式下，刷新率最高可达 144 Hz；否则，刷新率将在 1 到 120 Hz 之间动态调节。
亮度方面也没有任何变化。在显示 HDR 内容时，最高亮度可达 2,550 cd/m²。但必须批评的是，最低亮度相对较高，在黑暗中往往显得过亮。
我们测得的 PWM 频率为相当稳定的 480 Hz，振幅曲线平坦，当闪烁保护功能启动时，振幅曲线会变得更加平坦（见第二张截图）。不过，也不能排除有投诉的可能。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1652 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.87
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
99.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
| Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.8" | Google Pixel 9 Pro XL OLED, 2992x1344, 6.8" | Honor Magic7 Pro OLED, 2800x1280, 6.8" | Samsung Galaxy S25+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.7" | Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 46% | 29% | 4% | 30% | |
| Brightness middle | 1652 | 2148 30% | 1607 -3% | 1371 -17% | 1664 1% |
| Brightness | 1659 | 2050 24% | 1609 -3% | 1370 -17% | 1674 1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 96 | 86 -10% | 95 -1% | 96 0% | 98 2% |
| Black Level * | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 0.5 82% | 0.9 68% | 2.7 4% | 0.8 71% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5 | 1.4 72% | 1.8 64% | 4.2 16% | 2 60% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.3 | 0.8 76% | 1.7 48% | 2 39% | 1.8 45% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.23 99% | 2.24 98% | 2.03 108% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 6604 98% | 6582 99% | 6346 102% | 6450 101% | 6526 100% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
| Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra | |
| Honor Magic7 Pro | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Honor Magic7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
| Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | |
| Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 480 Hz Amplitude: 13.95 % |   | |
The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8516 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.98 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.475 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.5035 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 2.38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.9705 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.411 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池寿命 - Zenfone 会变得非常热
华硕 Zenfone 12 Ultra 配备了 骁龙 8 精英版16 GB 内存。这是目前智能手机中速度最快的 SoC 之一，性能也相应较高。即使在压力测试中，它的性能也相对稳定，但这是以极高的表面温度为代价的。
两个扬声器的音量非常大，但在最大音量时会有些失真。无线音频传输采用了多种编解码器，只有 Auracast 不支持。
5,500 毫安时电池允许长时间运行，但如果效率更高，运行时间肯定会更长。在测试中，充满电需要 53 分钟（50%：17 分钟）。
| Geekbench AI | |
| Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
| Honor Magic7 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (287 - 738, n=10) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (51 - 1501, n=37, last 2 years) | |
| Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (51 - 9453, n=37, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
| Honor Magic7 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (265 - 734, n=10) | |
| Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (123 - 13084, n=37, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
| Honor Magic7 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (594 - 1708, n=10) | |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52.7 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra | |
| Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | |
| Honor Magic7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | |
| Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
| Honor Magic7 Pro | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra | |
| Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | |
| Honor Magic7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
| Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra | |
| Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | |
| Honor Magic7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Zenfone 12 Ultra 在规格表上只提供了一些新功能。不过，它尤其在人工智能功能方面做了重大改进，而且现在终于支持 eSIM 卡了。
Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra
- 04/01/2025 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Total Sustainability Score: Possible alternatives comparison
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 84.8%  | Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $5.99 Aiziki (2 Pack Designed for ... 2. $14.95 BoxWave Adapter Compatible w... 3. $7.99 Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ... List Price: 1099€ | 220 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.78" 2400x1080 388 PPI AMOLED |
2. 86%  | Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Google Tensor G4 ⎘ ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $949.00 Google Pixel 9 Pro XL - Unlo... 2. $8.49 OMOTON 3+2 Pack for Google P... 3. $9.72 Ferilinso Full Coverage 3 Pa... List Price: 1299€ | 221 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.80" 2992x1344 482 PPI OLED |
3. 89.2%  | Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $11.99 Ibywind Screen Protector For... 2. $7.99 Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ... 3. $5.57 GANGANPRO 1 Pack Privacy Scr... List Price: 1300€ | 223 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.80" 2800x1280 453 PPI OLED |
4. 88.4%  | Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $5.94 firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree... 2. $16.99 Super Fast Charger Type C, 2... 3. $7.98 Ailun Glass Screen Protector... List Price: 1149 Euro | 190 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.70" 3120x1440 513 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
