Notebookcheck Logo

Aorus 15 YE5 评测:省钱的高端游戏笔记本电脑

RTX 3080 Ti,售价 1,500 美元。

Aorus 使用了上一代 CPU 和 GPU,以仅 1500 美元的价格销售前旗舰 RTX 3080 Ti。反过来,这款笔记本电脑的外壳和连接性其实也相当现代。您是否需要为这个价格做出更多妥协,或者 Aorus YE5 是一款真正适合省钱用户的高端隐藏精品?
Alder Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook

仅凭低廉的价格,Aorus 15 YE 就已经是一款有趣的游戏笔记本电脑。从外观上看,它时尚纤薄,价格实惠,甚至还包括 Thunderbolt 4 和 DDR5。相比之下,它的内部则安装了(强劲的)上一代硬件,即不太高端的酷睿 i5-12500H和上一代 Nvidia 旗舰机型 RTX 3080 Ti.这一切使 Aorus 15 YE5 成为 1500 美元内最强大的游戏笔记本电脑之一。

尽管 Aorus 15 YE5 的 CPU 和 GPU 都是上一代产品,但它仍需要与当前的竞争对手一较高下,以证明自己是否能跟上时代的步伐,以及是否能真正做到物有所值。随后,我们将把它与目前配备RTX 4060RTX 4070 的笔记本电脑进行对比,如Aorus 15 BSF (RTX4070)、Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 (RTX 4060)、HP Victus 16 (RTX 4070)、HP Omen 16 (RTX 4080) 和更昂贵的Dell XPS 15 9530 (RTX 4070)。

Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH (15 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-12500H 12 x 1.8 - 4.5 GHz, 85 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, 130 W TDP, Geforce 546.29
Memory
16 GB 
, 2x 8 GB DDR5-4800
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 188 PPI, Chi Mei CMN1540 (CMN N156KME-GNA), IPS, glossy: no, 165 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, 1024 GB 
, 960 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 1 x audio jack
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 27 x 360 x 244
Battery
99 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 1080P with Dual MIC
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 2x 2W Speakers, Keyboard: RGB keyboard, Keyboard Light: yes
Weight
2.314 kg, Power Supply: 693 g
Price
1800 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
86.6 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2023
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg27 mm15.60"2560x1440
85.7 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2023
Aorus 15 BSF
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg20.9 mm15.60"2560x1440
85.7 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2023
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg29 mm15.60"1920x1080
85.1 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2023
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg24 mm16.10"1920x1080
90.3 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1.9 kg18 mm15.60"3456x2160
87.4 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
HP Omen 16-wf000
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg23.6 mm16.10"2560x1440

外壳与连接:现代而简约

摄像头凹槽
摄像头凹槽
2 个螺丝上的保修贴纸
2 个螺丝上的保修贴纸

从外观上看,Aorus 看起来相当现代和吸引人。这要归功于其黑色磨砂、纤薄的外观设计--尽管这款笔记本电脑实际上并没有那么纤薄(最多 27 毫米)。同时,它在时尚的同时还保持了独特性,例如,背部风扇栅格的结构和在那里出现的小橘色,以及特别设计的斜角边缘。银色的 Aorus 徽标将你的注意力吸引到设备顶部。机盖的前上边缘有一个小凹槽,用于放置网络摄像头和扬声器--此外,单手打开笔记本电脑时,它还能给你带来非常好的握持感。

机壳的所有侧面均由光滑的塑料制成。这看起来很棒,但与某些竞争对手相比,它不那么耐扭曲。当你在键盘上打字时,键盘不会有任何松动,这意味着它的稳定性总体上还不错。

我们没有打开 Aorus,因为两颗 Torx 螺钉被贴纸覆盖,我们不想为了借用的 Cyberport 而损坏这些螺钉。

尺寸比较

369 mm 259 mm 24 mm 2.4 kg361 mm 241 mm 29 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 244 mm 27 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 272 mm 20.9 mm 2.4 kg345 mm 230 mm 18 mm 1.9 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性

前面的网线位于使用鼠标的一侧,不太理想
前面的网线位于使用鼠标的一侧,不太理想

Aorus 笔记本电脑的连接选项非常现代,同时也保持在最低水平。在三个 USB 端口中,只有一个是 Type-A,这还远远不够。反过来,两个 Type-C 端口中有一个支持 Thunderbolt 4。除了第四个 USB 接口外,该设备还缺少一个 SD 读卡器、一个 Kensington 锁和一个专用 DisplayPort(通过 USB-C 接口提供 2 个)。

尽管端口数量不多,但它们的布局并不理想--用于刚性网线的 RJ45 端口位于右侧,而且朝前。Aorus 背面的空间一如既往地没有使用。它只容纳了风扇插座。


右侧局域网、Thunderbolt 4、电源
右侧局域网、Thunderbolt 4、电源
左:HDMI、USB-C 3.0、3.5 毫米耳机、USB-A 3.0
左:HDMI、USB-C 3.0、3.5 毫米耳机、USB-A 3.0
前面:单手即可轻松打开
前面:单手即可轻松打开
返回:无连接
返回:无连接

WiFi 和摄像头

无论是 6 GHz(WiFi 6E)还是 5 GHz 网络,它的无线局域网传输速率都是同类产品中最高的。

遗憾的是,该设备的网络摄像头仍然是上一代产品:它的分辨率只有 720p,色彩偏差很大,控制中心也没有快门。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1483 (1421min - 1584max) MBit/s
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1418 (735min - 1503max) MBit/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=147, last 2 years)
1228 MBit/s -17%
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1115 (765min - 1228max) MBit/s -25%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (565 - 1687, n=26)
1110 MBit/s -25%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
894 (804min - 975max) MBit/s -40%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
862 (812min - 927max) MBit/s -42%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
MediaTek MT7921
714 (679min - 745max) MBit/s -52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1698 (1678min - 1712max) MBit/s
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1636 (1534min - 1678max) MBit/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1890, n=147, last 2 years)
1397 MBit/s -18%
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1295 (1173min - 1347max) MBit/s -24%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1235 (676min - 1389max) MBit/s -27%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (715 - 1715, n=26)
1222 MBit/s -28%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
925 (909min - 935max) MBit/s -46%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
MediaTek MT7921
726 (714min - 732max) MBit/s -57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1523 (1197min - 1618max) MBit/s
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1516 (149min - 1644max) MBit/s 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (648 - 1878, n=68, last 2 years)
1429 MBit/s -6%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (712 - 1615, n=22)
1338 MBit/s -12%
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1307 (981min - 1370max) MBit/s -14%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1693 (1616min - 1711max) MBit/s
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1590 (1563min - 1611max) MBit/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (853 - 1788, n=68, last 2 years)
1488 MBit/s -12%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (885 - 1827, n=23)
1478 MBit/s -13%
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1344 (1298min - 1390max) MBit/s -21%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1523 (1197-1618)
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1517 (149-1644)
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1692 (1616-1711)
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1590 (1563-1611)
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1483 (1421-1584)
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø862 (812-927)
HP Victus 16-r0077ng MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø714 (679-745)
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø895 (804-975)
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1697 (1678-1712)
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø925 (909-935)
HP Victus 16-r0077ng MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø726 (714-732)
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1212 (676-1389)
ColorChecker
16 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
23 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
25.6 ∆E
13 ∆E
24.7 ∆E
24 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
21 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH: 19.18 ∆E min: 3.32 - max: 26.87 ∆E

输入设备 - 多于实心,但有深色特殊按键标签

按键布局非常整齐--键盘略低于笔记本底座。方向键的大小也很正常,右侧还有一个数字小键盘。

按键只有中低升程,但在键入时仍然感觉出奇的舒适,这也得益于其良好的反馈。键入时的噪音偏小,因此也适用于低噪音环境。

按键的背光可以实现各种 RGB 效果,但不能为每个按键单独设置,不过这些按键可以为某些效果(雨滴)亮起不同的颜色。实用:如果按下 fn 键,所有可与 fn 键组合创建特殊功能的按键都会亮起。不过,只有普通按键的标签(如 "F7")会发光,而特殊功能("静音")则不会发光,这导致在黑暗环境中无法识别 F 键的特殊功能。

触摸板足够大(21.1 x 7.6 厘米),即使你的手没有完全干透,触摸起来也很顺滑。集成的点击按钮需要很大的力度,这意味着其压力点非常清晰。点击噪音适中。

键盘
键盘
升降平缓但反馈良好
升降平缓但反馈良好
酷炫的 fn 功能,但特殊功能不亮
酷炫的 fn 功能,但特殊功能不亮
RGB 照明
RGB 照明
额外的电源按钮
额外的电源按钮
触摸板
触摸板

显示屏 - 1440p,色彩准确度高

这款 Aorus 笔记本电脑的 WQHD 雾面显示屏由奇美公司制造,并已用于 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G15中使用过。这款产品非常成功,因此在 2023 年也不会显得过时。2560 x 1440 像素的分辨率、165Hz 的刷新率、相对较快的响应时间和色彩空间覆盖率(100% sRGB、97% Display P3)同样令人印象深刻。屏幕亮度和对比度则一般。此外,还有一款刷新率为 360 赫兹的全高清机型。

左下角和右上角边缘的背光出血现象非常明显,这一点不太理想。不过,PWM 并未用于亮度控制。其响应时间充其量只能算一般。

顶部和两侧边框纤薄
顶部和两侧边框纤薄
哑光、颗粒状子像素阵列
哑光、颗粒状子像素阵列
边缘和角落的背光渗色
边缘和角落的背光渗色
345
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
330
cd/m²
318
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
308
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
319
cd/m²
288
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Chi Mei CMN1540 (CMN N156KME-GNA) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 357 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 321.8 cd/m² Minimum: 8.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 350 cd/m²
Contrast: 939:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.27 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.61
ΔE Greyscale 3.67 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.38
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Chi Mei CMN1540 (CMN N156KME-GNA), IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
Aorus 15 BSF
Sharp LQ156T1JW05, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
BOE08B3, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
CMN162D, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1"
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Samsung 156XG01, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.6"
HP Omen 16-wf000
BOE0B7D, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1"
Display
0%
-21%
-18%
6%
-16%
Display P3 Coverage
97.7
98.2
1%
64
-34%
66.7
-32%
99.8
2%
69
-29%
sRGB Coverage
100
99.9
0%
93.2
-7%
98
-2%
100
0%
99.2
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
85.9
85.7
0%
66
-23%
69
-20%
98.4
15%
71.2
-17%
Response Times
40%
55%
30%
87%
47%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
18.9 ?(9.4, 9.5)
11.3 ?(5.2, 6.1)
40%
5 ?(2.422, 2.578)
74%
13.3 ?(6, 7.3)
30%
1.68 ?(0.8, 0.88)
91%
4.6 ?(2.1, 2.5)
76%
Response Time Black / White *
11.7 ?(7.2, 4.5)
7 ?(3.4, 3.6)
40%
7.55 ?(3.7, 3.85)
35%
8.2 ?(4.5, 3.7)
30%
1.94 ?(0.97, 0.97)
83%
9.7 ?(4.6, 5.1)
17%
PWM Frequency
239
Screen
-34%
-28%
15%
-36%
7%
Brightness middle
357
299
-16%
346
-3%
308
-14%
389.5
9%
310.9
-13%
Brightness
322
282
-12%
324
1%
285
-11%
392
22%
296
-8%
Brightness Distribution
81
82
1%
90
11%
85
5%
98
21%
91
12%
Black Level *
0.38
0.31
18%
0.35
8%
0.25
34%
0.35
8%
Contrast
939
965
3%
989
5%
1232
31%
888
-5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.27
2.24
1%
4.12
-81%
1.3
43%
4.95
-118%
2.18
4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.72
4.29
9%
7.78
-65%
2.76
42%
8.65
-83%
3.58
24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.61
2.62
-330%
1.22
-100%
0.92
-51%
1.53
-151%
0.52
15%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.67
3
18%
4.81
-31%
1.7
54%
2
46%
2.8
24%
Gamma
2.38 92%
2.086 105%
2.31 95%
2.167 102%
2.27 97%
2.18 101%
CCT
7899 82%
6289 103%
7633 85%
6767 96%
6265 104%
6002 108%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
2% / -16%
2% / -15%
9% / 10%
19% / -5%
13% / 8%

* ... smaller is better

虽然显示器没有经过最佳校准,但我们使用 X-Rite Fab 测量设备和 Calman 软件进行了校准,将灰度和色彩的 DeltaE 值(对(色彩)偏差很重要)降至远低于 1。加上其良好的色彩空间覆盖率(见下面最后一排图片),该显示器也适用于半专业的图像和视频编辑。

灰度
灰度
饱和度
饱和度
颜色检查器
颜色检查器
灰度校准
灰度校准
饱和度校准
饱和度校准
色彩校验仪已校准
色彩校验仪已校准
100 % sRGB
100 % sRGB
约 98 % 显示 P3
约 98 % 显示 P3
约 86 % AdobeRGB
约 86 % AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
11.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.2 ms rise
↘ 4.5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
18.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.4 ms rise
↘ 9.5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

得益于超过 300 尼特的亮度和亚光表面,该笔记本电脑的屏幕内容在阴暗环境下依然清晰可见。

十二月天气
十二月天气
倾斜视角
倾斜视角
相对稳定的 IPS 视角从上方看,会损失更多色彩和对比度
相对稳定的 IPS 视角从上方看,会损失更多色彩和对比度

性能 - 上一代产品依然出色

上一代 CPU 和 GPU 为系统提供动力。较旧的 酷睿 i5-12500H可使用 16 GB 现代 DDR5 4800 内存和技嘉 1 TB NVMe SSD。再加上 RTX 3080 Ti,Aorus 15 YE5 绝对可以被归类为高端游戏玩家--尽管它采用的是上一代的中端 CPU。

 

测试条件

Ex works,笔记本电脑没有预装控制中心 - 如果需要,应该可以从技嘉支持网站下载。如果需要,也可以从技嘉支持网站下载。

技嘉控制中心包含许多重要设置,可控制性能、键盘背光和固态硬盘。菜单的结构可以做得更好一些,因为主屏幕似乎没有显示任何有用的信息--你应该首先选择笔记本电脑本身或固态硬盘来获取更多信息。不过,你也可以在相关菜单中进行同样的操作,这就是为什么主屏幕显得特别无意义的原因。我们还错过了切换 GPU 的选项。

除此之外,还有性能模式、风扇曲线、可单独调节的性能模式和其他各种选项。我们使用游戏模式进行了基准测试。在使用更强大的涡轮增压模式时,风扇始终全速运转。

这个没有任何信息的主屏幕是不必要的
这个没有任何信息的主屏幕是不必要的
5 种性能模式,包括人工智能支持
5 种性能模式,包括人工智能支持
显示系统信息的仪表板
显示系统信息的仪表板
风扇曲线
风扇曲线
固态硬盘工具
固态硬盘工具
键盘背光
键盘背光

说说它的待机模式:Aorus(包括 Aorus 15G的笔记本电脑(包括 Aorus 15G),只要稍微合上笔记本盖子,笔记本电脑就会切换到待机模式,这似乎是一个普遍现象。例如,如果您正在使用外接显示器,并想将笔记本盖稍微向前折叠一下,这就非常恼人。然而,系统在 40 至 45 度左右就会关闭,这实在是太早了,会让人神经紧张。笔记本电脑应该在实际关闭时才关闭,而不是关闭到一半就关闭。

在这个开启角度,屏幕已经关闭...
在这个开启角度,屏幕已经关闭...
......笔记本电脑就会切换到待机模式--烦人
......笔记本电脑就会切换到待机模式--烦人

处理器

游戏
游戏
创作者
创作者
人工智能
人工智能
会议 + 省电模式
会议 + 省电模式
电池(游戏)
电池(游戏)

这款笔记本电脑配备了 Alder Lake CPU - Core i5-12500H。 酷睿 i5-12500H- 配备 4 个 P 核心和 8 个 E 核心。加起来共有 8 个内核和 16 个线程。这款老式的中高档 CPU 为制造商节省了成本。

在 Cinebench R15 循环测试中,它的性能在前两次运行中略有下降,随后保持稳定。

在所有 CPU 测试中,13 代 CPU 的速度明显优于 12 代 CPU。

Captiva配备了 i5-13500H领先约 13%。其他采用更好的 i7-13700H 处理器的竞争者的性能比 Captiva 低 8%(惠普 Victus)。惠普 Victus)到明显高出 22%(Aorus 15 BSFAorus 15 BSF).

Cinebench R15 多线程得分(第一次运行) CPU 功耗(瓦特
AI Boost 2,277 85
Turbo 2,283 85
游戏 2,283 85,降至 55
创作者 2,239 85
会议 836 30,迅速降至 15
省电模式 724 30,降至 15
电池 1,670 45

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

0140280420560700840980112012601400154016801820196021002240238025202660Tooltip
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH Intel Core i5-12500H: Ø2039 (1991.44-2282.84)
Aorus 15 BSF Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2187 (2043.32-2737.16)
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 Intel Core i5-13500H: Ø2439 (2410.8-2474.94)
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2242 (2203.13-2316.56)
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2169 (2072.22-2636.96)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
83.4 pt
HP Omen 16-wf000 -1!
Intel Core i7-13700HX
82.5 pt
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H
72.3 pt
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
70.9 pt
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H
66.7 pt
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H
63.4 pt
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H
59.1 pt
Average Intel Core i5-12500H
 
59 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years)
22015 Points +64%
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Core i7-13700HX
20051 (17276.1min - 20051.4max) Points +49%
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H
17219 Points +28%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H
16335 Points +21%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
15474 (14020.7min - 15473.8max) Points +15%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H
15410 Points +15%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H
13451 Points
Average Intel Core i5-12500H
  (11330 - 14686, n=9)
13197 Points -2%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H
1899 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=188, last 2 years)
1894 Points +12%
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Core i7-13700HX
1862 Points +10%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
1836 Points +8%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H
1783 Points +5%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H
1696 Points
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H
1687 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i5-12500H
  (1558 - 1701, n=9)
1663 Points -2%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years)
8361 Points +65%
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Core i7-13700HX
7692 Points +52%
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H
6650 Points +32%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H
6212 Points +23%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
5986 Points +18%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H
5895 Points +17%
Average Intel Core i5-12500H
  (4687 - 5640, n=9)
5079 Points 0%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H
5054 Points
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H
732 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years)
727 Points +11%
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Core i7-13700HX
720 Points +10%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
696 Points +7%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H
684 Points +5%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H
653 Points
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H
649 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i5-12500H
  (602 - 656, n=9)
642 Points -2%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years)
3441 Points +51%
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Core i7-13700HX
3008 (2466.4min - 3007.52max) Points +32%
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H
2737 Points +20%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
2637 (2072.22min - 2636.96max) Points +16%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H
2475 (2410.8min - 2474.94max) Points +8%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H
2317 (2203.13min - 2316.56max) Points +1%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H
2283 (1991.44min - 2282.84max) Points
Average Intel Core i5-12500H
  (1970 - 2283, n=10)
2125 Points -7%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years)
278 Points +12%
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H
272 Points +9%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
270 Points +8%
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Core i7-13700HX
264 Points +6%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H
261 Points +5%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H
249 Points
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H
245 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i5-12500H
  (220 - 250, n=9)
240 Points -4%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H
246 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i5-12500H
  (223 - 288, n=9)
246 Seconds * -0%
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H
220 Seconds * +11%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
217 Seconds * +12%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H
215 Seconds * +13%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H
205 Seconds * +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years)
169.1 Seconds * +31%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=185, last 2 years)
85859 MIPS +62%
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Core i7-13700HX
77963 MIPS +47%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H
65405 MIPS +24%
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H
62343 MIPS +18%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
59413 MIPS +12%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H
57276 MIPS +8%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H
52924 MIPS
Average Intel Core i5-12500H
  (44105 - 54380, n=9)
50841 MIPS -4%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=185, last 2 years)
6320 MIPS +17%
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H
6197 MIPS +14%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
6124 MIPS +13%
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Core i7-13700HX
5967 MIPS +10%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H
5885 MIPS +9%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H
5559 MIPS +3%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H
5418 MIPS
Average Intel Core i5-12500H
  (5151 - 5563, n=9)
5337 MIPS -1%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years)
15118 Points +43%
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Core i7-13700HX
14942 Points +41%
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H
13409 Points +27%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
13241 Points +25%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H
11504 Points +9%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H
10560 Points
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H
10358 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i5-12500H
  (7962 - 10828, n=9)
9792 Points -7%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
1900 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years)
1898 Points +17%
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Core i7-13700HX
1886 Points +16%
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H
1880 Points +16%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H
1755 Points +8%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H
1685 Points +4%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H
1626 Points
Average Intel Core i5-12500H
  (1471 - 1693, n=9)
1623 Points 0%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years)
23.6 fps +56%
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Core i7-13700HX
21.1 fps +40%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H
17.9 fps +19%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
17.6 fps +17%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H
16.6 fps +10%
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H
16.4 fps +9%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H
15.1 fps
Average Intel Core i5-12500H
  (12 - 16.6, n=9)
15.1 fps 0%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H
61.5 s * -5%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H
58.5 s *
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H
54.3 s * +7%
Average Intel Core i5-12500H
  (40.1 - 58.5, n=9)
48.3 s * +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 199, n=182, last 2 years)
48.2 s * +18%
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H
47.1 s * +19%
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Core i7-13700HX
45.5 s * +22%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
43.5 s * +26%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H
0.519 sec *
Average Intel Core i5-12500H
  (0.4748 - 0.535, n=9)
0.507 sec * +2%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H
0.504 sec * +3%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H
0.4802 sec * +7%
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Core i7-13700HX
0.4562 sec * +12%
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H
0.4421 sec * +15%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
0.4384 sec * +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years)
0.4364 sec * +16%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2283 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
185 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
249 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5054 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
653 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1696 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
13451 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
98.2 pt
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
72.7 pt
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
71.7 pt
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
69 pt
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
69 pt
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
64.4 pt
Average Intel Core i5-12500H
 
60.6 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=182, last 2 years)
21996 KRay/s +78%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
15390 KRay/s +25%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
14470 KRay/s +17%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13869 KRay/s +13%
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13479 KRay/s +9%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
12328 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i5-12500H
  (6851 - 13947, n=9)
11809 KRay/s -4%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=182, last 2 years)
107132 Points +77%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
74251 Points +23%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
72193 Points +19%
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
69345 Points +14%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
69120 Points +14%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
60600 Points
Average Intel Core i5-12500H
  (29874 - 68178, n=9)
58950 Points -3%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=182, last 2 years)
4927 MB/s +61%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
3623 MB/s +18%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3326 MB/s +9%
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3238 MB/s +6%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3146 MB/s +3%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3060 MB/s
Average Intel Core i5-12500H
  (2287 - 3337, n=9)
2969 MB/s -3%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=182, last 2 years)
117304 Points +46%
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
105776 Points +32%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
103652 Points +29%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
91638 Points +14%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
85390 Points +6%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
80235 Points
Average Intel Core i5-12500H
  (77935 - 80703, n=9)
79674 Points -1%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=182, last 2 years)
13306 Points +79%
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
9143 Points +23%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
8714 Points +17%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
8677 Points +17%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
8086 Points +9%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
7431 Points
Average Intel Core i5-12500H
  (6590 - 7431, n=9)
7248 Points -2%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=182, last 2 years)
53901 Points +79%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
38336 Points +28%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
36179 Points +20%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
33848 Points +13%
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
33785 Points +12%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
30044 Points
Average Intel Core i5-12500H
  (18252 - 34041, n=9)
29271 Points -3%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
120493 MB/s +8%
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119772 MB/s +7%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
111567 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=182, last 2 years)
109375 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i5-12500H
  (50298 - 111567, n=9)
88138 MB/s -21%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
66484 MB/s -40%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
62599 MB/s -44%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=182, last 2 years)
1372 MB/s +49%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
987 MB/s +7%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
950 MB/s +3%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
921 MB/s
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
918 MB/s 0%
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
917 MB/s 0%
Average Intel Core i5-12500H
  (746 - 924, n=9)
872 MB/s -5%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=182, last 2 years)
11845 KRay/s +81%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
8495 KRay/s +30%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
7770 KRay/s +19%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
7475 KRay/s +14%
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
7334 KRay/s +12%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
6530 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i5-12500H
  (3848 - 7405, n=9)
6322 KRay/s -3%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
44101 MPixel/s +34%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=183, last 2 years)
40439 MPixel/s +23%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
39045 MPixel/s +19%
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
37932 MPixel/s +16%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
32840 MPixel/s
Average Intel Core i5-12500H
  (13686 - 43813, n=9)
30946 MPixel/s -6%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
24637 MPixel/s -25%

系统性能

在 PCMark 10 中,采用后续 CPU 的 Captiva 领先约 7%,而在 CrossMark 中,两款设备的表现相同。

PCMark 10
PCMark 10
PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years)
7817 Points +14%
HP Omen 16-wf000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
7814 Points +14%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
7375 Points +7%
Aorus 15 BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
7309 Points +6%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
7253 Points +5%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
7158 Points +4%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
6883 Points
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
6883 Points 0%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
11526 Points +13%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
11449 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=162, last 2 years)
10832 Points +6%
Aorus 15 BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10812 Points +6%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
10707 Points +5%
HP Omen 16-wf000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
10522 Points +3%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10188 Points
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
10188 Points 0%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=162, last 2 years)
9912 Points +12%
HP Omen 16-wf000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
9125 Points +3%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
9097 Points +3%
Aorus 15 BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
9033 Points +2%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
8974 Points +1%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
8846 Points
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
8846 Points 0%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
8501 Points -4%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
HP Omen 16-wf000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
13487 Points +37%
Average of class Gaming
  (6807 - 18475, n=162, last 2 years)
12183 Points +24%
Aorus 15 BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10847 Points +10%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
10637 Points +8%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
10384 Points +6%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
10358 Points +5%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
9820 Points
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
9820 Points 0%
CrossMark / Overall
Aorus 15 BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2073 Points +24%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=143, last 2 years)
1912 Points +15%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1888 Points +13%
HP Omen 16-wf000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1707 Points +2%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
1693 Points +1%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1668 Points
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
1668 Points 0%
CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus 15 BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2006 Points +25%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=143, last 2 years)
1811 Points +13%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1754 Points +9%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
1672 Points +4%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1607 Points
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
1607 Points 0%
HP Omen 16-wf000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1570 Points -2%
CrossMark / Creativity
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2137 Points +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=143, last 2 years)
2101 Points +18%
Aorus 15 BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2100 Points +18%
HP Omen 16-wf000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1978 Points +11%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1785 Points
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
1785 Points 0%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
1740 Points -3%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Aorus 15 BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2202 Points +45%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=143, last 2 years)
1709 Points +12%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1627 Points +7%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
1616 Points +6%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1522 Points
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
1522 Points 0%
HP Omen 16-wf000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1407 Points -8%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
321 Points +18%
Aorus 15 BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
310 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=161, last 2 years)
304 Points +12%
HP Omen 16-wf000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
296 Points +9%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
277 Points +2%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
277 Points +2%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
273 Points 0%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
273 Points 0%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
272 Points
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
272 Points 0%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
277 Points +15%
Aorus 15 BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
277 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (176.4 - 328, n=150, last 2 years)
267 Points +11%
HP Omen 16-wf000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
266 Points +11%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
246 Points +3%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
246 Points +3%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
240 Points
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
240 Points 0%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
234 Points -2%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
234 Points -2%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
555 ms *
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
555 ms * -0%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
543 ms * +2%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
543 ms * +2%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
519 ms * +6%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
519 ms * +6%
HP Omen 16-wf000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
510 ms * +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 674, n=176, last 2 years)
502 ms * +10%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
496 ms * +11%
Aorus 15 BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
494 ms * +11%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
6883 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
66025 MB/s +31%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=182, last 2 years)
65752 MB/s +31%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
60917 MB/s +21%
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
59991 MB/s +19%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
50341 MB/s
Average Intel Core i5-12500H
  (23850 - 66598, n=9)
47586 MB/s -5%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
36916 MB/s -27%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70378 MB/s +26%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70121 MB/s +26%
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=182, last 2 years)
69626 MB/s +25%
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
67672 MB/s +21%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
55738 MB/s
Average Intel Core i5-12500H
  (24879 - 68013, n=9)
51450 MB/s -8%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
41676 MB/s -25%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
99898 MB/s +86%
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=182, last 2 years)
67472 MB/s +26%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
67424 MB/s +26%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
61520 MB/s +15%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
53586 MB/s
Average Intel Core i5-12500H
  (23543 - 58797, n=9)
49013 MB/s -9%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
36826 MB/s -31%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
100.6 ns *
Average Intel Core i5-12500H
  (83.8 - 114.7, n=9)
98.8 ns * +2%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
94.1 ns * +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=182, last 2 years)
94.1 ns * +6%
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
91.8 ns * +9%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.9 ns * +14%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
86.2 ns * +14%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

由于控制中心不提供平衡模式,我们使用会议模式和创作者模式对笔记本电脑进行了测试。前者在打开多个浏览器标签页时出现了一些延迟问题,在播放 4K/60-fps 的 YouTube 视频时,这些问题变得更加严重,导致了 8 次丢帧。

如果你认为使用功能更强大的创作者模式后情况会有所改观,那就大错特错了。我们已经注意到打开浏览器时延迟增加。另一方面,视频运行时只出现了一次丢帧。

会议模式:YouTube
会议模式:YouTube
会议模式:LatencyMon 主机
会议模式:LatencyMon 主机
会议模式:LatencyMon 驱动程序
会议模式:LatencyMon 驱动程序
创作模式:YouTube
创作模式:YouTube
创建模式:LatencyMon 主机
创建模式:LatencyMon 主机
创建模式:LatencyMon 驱动程序
创建模式:LatencyMon 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP Omen 16-wf000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
2645.9 μs * -22%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2175 μs *
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1697 μs * +22%
Aorus 15 BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1664.7 μs * +23%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1083.5 μs * +50%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
1035.9 μs * +52%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

安装了 1 TB 存储空间的技嘉 AG470S1TB-SI B10 是一款快速的高端 PCIe Gen 4 NVMe 固态硬盘。在我们的 固态硬盘最佳排行榜中,它目前排在第 3 位,表现出色。

在 Aorus 15 YE5 中,它可能无法充分发挥自己的潜力(比参考型号落后 12%),但它仍然比竞争对手的固态硬盘更快。唯一的例外是当前一代的 Aorus 15。它使用了相同的固态硬盘,但速度快了 28%。即便如此,我们测试样本的性能仍然非常出色,最重要的是,它在连续使用过程中保持稳定,没有出现节流问题。

AS 固态硬盘
AS 固态硬盘
AS SSD 复制
AS SSD 复制
Crystaldiskmark 6
Crystaldiskmark 6
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7053 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4965 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 670 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 790 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 66.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 196 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 2496 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 2048 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Aorus 15 BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
91.1 pt
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
 
79.7 pt
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
71.4 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
66.1 pt
HP Omen 16-wf000
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
65.4 pt
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
59.5 pt
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
56.1 pt
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
50.5 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
HP Omen 16-wf000
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
4427 (4395.42min - 4426.62max) MB/s +18%
Aorus 15 BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4224 (3897.73min - 4223.61max) MB/s +13%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3744 (3109.66min - 3743.84max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=164, last 2 years)
3478 MB/s -7%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (2519 - 4224, n=10)
3439 MB/s -8%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
2735 (2694.63min - 2735.3max) MB/s -27%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2511 (2497.5min - 2511.13max) MB/s -33%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
1856 (1838.25min - 1855.56max) MB/s -50%
seq write
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
3845 (3754.57min - 3844.71max) MB/s +35%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=164, last 2 years)
3831 MB/s +35%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3641 (3537min - 3640.66max) MB/s +28%
HP Omen 16-wf000
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3627 (3368.21min - 3627.15max) MB/s +28%
Aorus 15 BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3300 (3281.98min - 3300.19max) MB/s +16%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (2200 - 4236, n=10)
3133 MB/s +10%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2840 (2668.11min - 2840.15max) MB/s
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
2456 (2427.66min - 2456.3max) MB/s -14%
seq q8 t1 read
HP Omen 16-wf000
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
7132 (6103.13min - 7132.42max) MB/s 0%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
7112 (6526.08min - 7111.9max) MB/s
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (6864 - 7112, n=10)
6974 MB/s -2%
Aorus 15 BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
6864 (6443.08min - 6863.98max) MB/s -3%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6570 (5809.83min - 6569.96max) MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=164, last 2 years)
6319 MB/s -11%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
6169 (5196.32min - 6168.56max) MB/s -13%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
3552 (2996.83min - 3551.74max) MB/s -50%
seq q8 t1 write
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6104 (6052.8min - 6104.18max) MB/s +22%
HP Omen 16-wf000
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
5993 (5971.65min - 5992.64max) MB/s +20%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5355 (5315.44min - 5354.87max) MB/s +7%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4999 (4992.35min - 4999.4max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=164, last 2 years)
4867 MB/s -3%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (3611 - 4999, n=10)
4259 MB/s -15%
Aorus 15 BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3683 MB/s -26%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
2717 (2695.32min - 2717.07max) MB/s -46%
4k q1 t1 read
Aorus 15 BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
91 (90.05min - 91max) MB/s +27%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (55 - 91, n=10)
75.6 MB/s +5%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
73.6 (72.25min - 73.56max) MB/s +3%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
71.8 (68.68min - 71.78max) MB/s
HP Omen 16-wf000
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
70.4 (69.85min - 70.35max) MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=164, last 2 years)
65.9 MB/s -8%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
59.8 (58.67min - 59.75max) MB/s -17%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
56.6 (54min - 56.56max) MB/s -21%
4k q1 t1 write
Aorus 15 BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
341 (323.98min - 341.02max) MB/s +70%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (201 - 391, n=10)
324 MB/s +61%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
259 (254.62min - 258.51max) MB/s +29%
Average of class Gaming
  (78 - 397, n=164, last 2 years)
224 MB/s +11%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
201 (196.79min - 201.33max) MB/s
HP Omen 16-wf000
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
175.8 (171.76min - 175.78max) MB/s -13%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
175.2 (173.12min - 175.17max) MB/s -13%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
142.3 (140.08min - 142.3max) MB/s -29%
4k q32 t16 read
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (3318 - 3583, n=10)
3521 MB/s +6%
Aorus 15 BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3429 (3303.46min - 3428.75max) MB/s +3%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3318 (3254.42min - 3317.78max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=164, last 2 years)
2589 MB/s -22%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
2054 (2050.65min - 2054.43max) MB/s -38%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1004 (933.19min - 1004.48max) MB/s -70%
HP Omen 16-wf000
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
956 (930.59min - 955.89max) MB/s -71%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
681 (654.71min - 680.72max) MB/s -79%
4k q32 t16 write
Aorus 15 BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3667 (3605.94min - 3667.28max) MB/s +42%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (2584 - 3667, n=10)
3502 MB/s +36%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2584 (2375.71min - 2584.47max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=164, last 2 years)
2144 MB/s -17%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
1878 (1860.78min - 1877.62max) MB/s -27%
HP Omen 16-wf000
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
549 (523.52min - 549.32max) MB/s -79%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
510 (500.59min - 509.88max) MB/s -80%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
488 (476.91min - 488.32max) MB/s -81%
AS SSD
Score Total
Aorus 15 BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10783 Points +64%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (5636 - 10783, n=10)
8549 Points +30%
HP Omen 16-wf000
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
6766 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=155, last 2 years)
6759 Points +3%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
6590 Points
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
5903 Points -10%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
4988 Points -24%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
4891 Points -26%
Score Read
Aorus 15 BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3628 Points +40%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (1805 - 3629, n=10)
3256 Points +26%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2586 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=155, last 2 years)
2451 Points -5%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
2051 Points -21%
HP Omen 16-wf000
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1564 Points -40%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1480 Points -43%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1433 Points -45%
Score Write
Aorus 15 BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
5339 Points +87%
HP Omen 16-wf000
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
4488 Points +58%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
3834 Points +35%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (2849 - 5339, n=10)
3713 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=155, last 2 years)
3117 Points +9%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
2858 Points 0%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2849 Points
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
1770 Points -38%
Seq Read
Aorus 15 BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
5549.04 MB/s +2%
HP Omen 16-wf000
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
5479.27 MB/s +1%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
5435 MB/s
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5265.97 MB/s -3%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
5103.97 MB/s -6%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (4494 - 5715, n=10)
5048 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=155, last 2 years)
4958 MB/s -9%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
2260 MB/s -58%
Seq Write
Aorus 15 BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4476.18 MB/s +127%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=155, last 2 years)
3780 MB/s +91%
HP Omen 16-wf000
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3437.81 MB/s +74%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (1891 - 4476, n=10)
3202 MB/s +62%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
2831.66 MB/s +43%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2808.19 MB/s +42%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
2477 MB/s +25%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1974 MB/s
4K Read
Aorus 15 BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
112.08 MB/s +62%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (61.3 - 112.1, n=10)
90.5 MB/s +31%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
69.3 MB/s
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
68.88 MB/s -1%
HP Omen 16-wf000
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
67.91 MB/s -2%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
65.6 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=155, last 2 years)
65 MB/s -6%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
61.43 MB/s -11%
4K Write
Aorus 15 BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
358.18 MB/s +44%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (206 - 358, n=10)
287 MB/s +16%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
248 MB/s
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
247.17 MB/s 0%
HP Omen 16-wf000
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
229.62 MB/s -7%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
222 MB/s -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=155, last 2 years)
212 MB/s -15%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
209.28 MB/s -16%
4K-64 Read
Aorus 15 BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2960.59 MB/s +50%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (1285 - 2964, n=10)
2660 MB/s +35%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1973 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=155, last 2 years)
1885 MB/s -4%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
1760 MB/s -11%
HP Omen 16-wf000
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
948.37 MB/s -52%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
892.37 MB/s -55%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
853.63 MB/s -57%
4K-64 Write
Aorus 15 BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4533.18 MB/s +89%
HP Omen 16-wf000
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3914.27 MB/s +63%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
3305.51 MB/s +38%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (2403 - 4533, n=10)
3105 MB/s +29%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=155, last 2 years)
2530 MB/s +5%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2403 MB/s
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
2365.53 MB/s -2%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
1301 MB/s -46%
Access Time Read
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
0.077 ms * -175%
Aorus 15 BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.065 ms * -132%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (0.028 - 0.094, n=10)
0.0632 ms * -126%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=154, last 2 years)
0.05545 ms * -98%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
0.052 ms * -86%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
0.03 ms * -7%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.028 ms *
HP Omen 16-wf000
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
0.022 ms * +21%
Access Time Write
HP Omen 16-wf000
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
0.054 ms * -260%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
0.053 ms * -253%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=155, last 2 years)
0.04715 ms * -214%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
0.02 ms * -33%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
0.017 ms * -13%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.015 ms *
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
  (0.011 - 0.018, n=10)
0.0135 ms * +10%
Aorus 15 BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.011 ms * +27%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036072010801440180021602520288032403600396043204680504054005760612064806840Tooltip
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7086 (6327.04-7109.81)
Aorus 15 BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10: Ø6908 (6337.08-6965.69)
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW: Ø3523 (2632.14-3552.34)
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02: Ø5244 (4542.22-6091.41)
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N: Ø6457 (5082.24-6523.03)
HP Omen 16-wf000 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N: Ø7111 (6514.78-7131.37)

图形卡

前旗舰机型 Geforce RTX 3080 Ti配备 16GB 内存,作为笔记本电脑的显卡负责 3D 计算。不过,在最大可能的 165 瓦功率中,它的功率只有 130 瓦。这款功能强大的安培芯片不如当前的 Ada Lovelace 架构高效,可能会产生更多热量。

在合成 3DMark 基准测试中,我们的 Aorus 超越了搭载了 RTX 4060RTX 4070.我们的 RTX 3080 Ti 在几乎所有测试中都遥遥领先,即使只有几个百分点的差距。不过,它们之间的差距很小,但在所有测试中都保持不变。

在电池模式下,RTX 3080 Ti 在Fire Strike 中的性能从 31110 分下降到只有 6921 分,降幅高达 78%!

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
3DMarkFire Strike
3DMarkFire Strike
3DMarkTime Spy
3DMarkTime Spy
3DMarkCloud Gate
3DMarkCloud Gate
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
HP Omen 16-wf000 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
100 pt
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
79.4 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
79 pt
Aorus 15 BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
78.3 pt
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
77.8 pt
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-13500H
74.2 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
 
73.9 pt
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
40.4 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Omen 16-wf000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
56145 Points +35%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years)
43982 Points +6%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
41658 Points
Aorus 15 BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
41438 Points -1%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
39951 Points -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (13920 - 45841, n=45)
39402 Points -5%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-13500H
36508 Points -12%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
24229 Points -42%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-13500H
180228 Points +8%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
175566 Points +5%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
167612 Points
Aorus 15 BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
165849 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (73574 - 192520, n=26)
145836 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=100, last 2 years)
144664 Points -14%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Omen 16-wf000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
38663 Points +24%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=193, last 2 years)
31524 Points +1%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
31110 Points
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
30239 Points -3%
Aorus 15 BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
30081 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6928 - 34439, n=43)
29496 Points -5%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-13500H
27752 Points -11%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
16212 Points -48%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
HP Omen 16-wf000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
17339 Points +43%
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=188, last 2 years)
13169 Points +9%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
12104 Points
Aorus 15 BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
12079 Points 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (4921 - 13835, n=43)
11850 Points -2%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
11168 Points -8%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-13500H
10417 Points -14%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
6241 Points -48%
3DMark 11 Performance
30440 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
59322 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
25321 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
11945 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
28 Seconds * -27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (20 - 28, n=13)
23.1 Seconds * -5%
Aorus 15 BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
23 Seconds * -5%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-13500H
23 Seconds * -5%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
23 Seconds * -5%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
22 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=178, last 2 years)
20.7 Seconds * +6%
HP Omen 16-wf000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
17 Seconds * +23%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
46 Seconds * -35%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-13500H
42 Seconds * -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=184, last 2 years)
36.6 Seconds * -8%
Aorus 15 BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
36 Seconds * -6%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
36 Seconds * -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (32 - 41, n=13)
35 Seconds * -3%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
34 Seconds *
HP Omen 16-wf000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
22 Seconds * +35%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
429 Seconds *
Aorus 15 BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
390 Seconds * +9%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
379 Seconds * +12%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
377 Seconds * +12%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-13500H
348 Seconds * +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (261 - 429, n=13)
295 Seconds * +31%
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=187, last 2 years)
293 Seconds * +32%
HP Omen 16-wf000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
290 Seconds * +32%

* ... smaller is better

游戏

在游戏中,我们的 Aorus 与 新一代 Aorus(配备 RTX 4070不相上下,甚至还以微弱优势击败了它。所有其他配备 RTX 4070 的竞争对手也都以微弱优势落败。搭载 配备 RTX 4080 的 Omen 16在所有游戏测试中都比排名第二的 Aorus 快约 18%。在以 CPU 为核心的游戏中,它的性能落后于竞争对手,这是因为它采用了性能平平的 i5-12500H.

在对各种模式进行比较时,可以发现在Witcher 3 中,涡轮、人工智能和游戏模式的 GPU 性能几乎相同。唯一的区别是,在涡轮模式下 GPU 的温度明显降低,但噪音也明显增大。

加速(绿色)、人工智能(蓝色)、游戏(红色):GPU 时钟
加速(绿色)、人工智能(蓝色)、游戏(红色):GPU 时钟
内存时钟
内存时钟
GPU 功耗
GPU 功耗
涡轮更响亮、更冷却
涡轮更响亮、更冷却

创造者模式(此次为蓝色曲线)的表现稍差,耗电量没有那么大,而且温度也稍低。在噪音排放部分,我们列出了运行 Witcher 3 时的各种模式及其对 FPS 和噪音排放的影响。

游戏(红色)、创作者(蓝色)、涡轮(绿色):GPU 时钟
游戏(红色)、创作者(蓝色)、涡轮(绿色):GPU 时钟
GPU 温度
GPU 温度
GPU 功耗
GPU 功耗
Performance Rating - Percent
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
99.4 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
86.8 pt
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH -1!
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
84.3 pt
Aorus 15 BSF -1!
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
81.5 pt
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77.8 pt
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
77.6 pt
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
57.4 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
163.4 (140min) fps +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=161, last 2 years)
129 fps +8%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
120 fps
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117 (103min) fps -2%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
114 fps -5%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
101 fps -16%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
69.8 (64min) fps -42%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
118 (3.98min, 83.3P1) fps
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
117 (8.04min, 76.9P1) fps -1%
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
114 (5.05min, 76.9P1) fps -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years)
113.9 fps -3%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
112.8 (4.13min, 66.7P1) fps -4%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
63.5 (4.22min, 37P1) fps -46%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
153.9 fps +29%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years)
120.3 fps +1%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
119.2 fps
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115.4 fps -3%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
109.3 fps -8%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
102.2 fps -14%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
66 fps -45%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
299 (25.7min, 217P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=177, last 2 years)
230 fps
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
202 (30.6min, 150.9P1) fps
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
192 (24.8min, 138.8P1) fps
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
187.9 (125.1min, 137.8P1) fps
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117.7 (64.5min, 88.7P1) fps
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
153.7 (133.3min) fps +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (65.1 - 220, n=186, last 2 years)
151.3 fps +9%
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
149.9 (129.9min) fps +8%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
140.5 (124min) fps +1%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
138.9 (121.9min) fps
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
137 (116.5min) fps -1%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
131.6 (112.7min) fps -5%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
118.5 fps +25%
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
113.4 fps +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 166.2, n=193, last 2 years)
108.5 fps +14%
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
99.4 fps +5%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
95.4 fps +1%
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
94.9 fps
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90.6 fps -5%

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170Tooltip
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø116.7 (107-125)
Aorus 15 BSF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø116.4 (112-119)
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø99.3 (95-104)
HP Victus 16-r0077ng i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø107.8 (102-118)
HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø163.4 (153-172)
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 184.4 180.8 176 118
The Witcher 3 (2015) 385 306 222 120 86
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 167.6 154.1 146.4 138.9 140.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 206 151.7 119.2 92.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 134.1 121.3 94.9 85.4
Far Cry 5 (2018) 165 137 131 124 116

排放与功率 - 比 RTX 3080 Ti 所显示的更好

噪音排放

在涡轮增压模式下,风扇始终接近极限,即 52 至 55 分贝。而在其他模式下,风扇则更多地根据情况工作。下表列出了在播放《TheWitcher 3 》约 10 分钟后不同模式下的噪音排放水平。总体而言,相对于其性能而言,其噪音排放可以说是适中的,而且由于有多种模式,可以对其进行非常灵活的调节。无论是 Captiva惠普 Victus在 3D 应用中表现较差,但噪音却差不多,Captiva 甚至更大。

在游戏模式下,笔记本电脑空转时风扇也会工作,尽管声音很小。在会议模式或节能模式下,风扇通常很安静。在模拟平均负载情况下(3DMark06),选择游戏模式时,噪音逐渐增加,最高达到 43 分贝。在节能模式下,同样的测试仅为 27 分贝。

性能模式/Witcher 3 最高帧频 平均帧频 噪音排放(分贝) 消耗(瓦特
Turbo 124 118 52.68 199
AI 122 116 44.78 197
游戏 125 116 46.77 196
创作者 115 110 44.78 185
会议 111 105 36.53 163
节能器 115 106 36.53 162

Noise Level

Idle
23 / 23 / 26.42 dB(A)
Load
43.5 / 50.21 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.428.531.42533.331.933.33136.532.936.54028.421.928.45027.320.227.36325.920.525.98024.315.724.310026.620.926.612528.913.628.916030.314.530.320032.617.732.625034.215.834.231533.510.633.540034.910.734.950034.910.434.963034.511.134.580036.810.136.8100037.210.637.2125038.91038.9160041.69.941.6200039.410.539.4250038.710.938.7315038.41138.440003711.237500037.811.537.8630040.911.640.980003511.8351000030.111.630.11250026.211.426.21600020.210.720.2SPL50.223.250.2N7.40.57.4median 34.9median 11.1median 34.9Delta3.91.43.941.639.839.436.938.940.23836.835.730.334.635.645.343.340.139.939.745.33128.928.426.929.532.940.339.239.539.438.939.534.326.225.623.222.834.235.326.3221916.638.72618.517.916.115.434.527.620.818.316.515.432.428.722.520.418.118.133.630.525.325.422.62334.130.423.120.916.816.434.930.122.218.613.913.334.833.925.219.712.211.739.337.227.521.111.611.242.537.727.620.711.511.543.239.127.820.610.910.744.74128.721.111.110.546.84127.620.611.110.646.942.228.820.811.710.748.840.526.318.711.51147.139.325.119.812.311.246.436.925.115.712.511.9443519.713.712.712.341.938.718.213.913.712.443.534.716.713.913.613.844.528.213.713.213.112.638.725.713.212.912.712.136.42212.912.512.511.833.317.311.911.811.811.128.650.637.430.724.824.357.17.22.51.30.60.611.4median 34.7median 23.1median 18.7median 12.5median 11.9median 41.95.75.32.91.41.95.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SHAorus 15 BSF
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
Aorus 15 BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
HP Omen 16-wf000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
Noise
-20%
-3%
-9%
10%
-13%
off / environment *
23
24
-4%
23
-0%
25
-9%
23.1
-0%
23
-0%
Idle Minimum *
23
25
-9%
23
-0%
28
-22%
23.1
-0%
29.6
-29%
Idle Average *
23
31
-35%
25.67
-12%
29
-26%
23.1
-0%
29.8
-30%
Idle Maximum *
26.42
37
-40%
25.67
3%
30
-14%
24.2
8%
30.4
-15%
Load Average *
43.5
51
-17%
38.52
11%
43
1%
27.1
38%
33.8
22%
Witcher 3 ultra *
46.77
54.17
-16%
46
2%
40.1
14%
57
-22%
Load Maximum *
50.21
57
-14%
54.17
-8%
48
4%
44.6
11%
58.3
-16%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在高负载情况下会发热,尤其是底部中央的显示屏。不过,在高达 50 °C的温度下,它的温度仍在典型游戏笔记本电脑的范围之内。顶部的温度甚至出奇地低,最高只有 43 °C。在涡轮增压模式下,温度甚至更低。

Max. Load
 35 °C43 °C41 °C 
 29 °C36 °C33 °C 
 24 °C26 °C23 °C 
Maximum: 43 °C
Average: 32.2 °C
46 °C50 °C44 °C
37 °C43 °C38 °C
21 °C22 °C22 °C
Maximum: 50 °C
Average: 35.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  56 °C | Room Temperature 18 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+2.9 °C / 5.2 F).
压力测试顶部
压力测试顶部
电源压力测试
电源压力测试
压力测试底部
压力测试底部
Witcher 3 顶级
Witcher 3 顶级
Witcher 3 电源
Witcher 3 电源
Witcher 3 底层
Witcher 3 底层
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Aorus 15 BSF
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
HP Omen 16-wf000
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Heat
-8%
4%
-8%
1%
5%
Maximum Upper Side *
43
48
-12%
41
5%
51
-19%
45.6
-6%
45
-5%
Maximum Bottom *
50
47
6%
42
16%
54
-8%
42
16%
48.8
2%
Idle Upper Side *
33
39
-18%
32
3%
37
-12%
34.4
-4%
29.2
12%
Idle Bottom *
32
35
-9%
35
-9%
29
9%
33.2
-4%
28.8
10%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

扬声器音量适中是一个积极的方面。不过,几乎没有低音,甚至中高音也不是特别均衡。

麦克风和耳机的 3.5 毫米组合插孔可用于连接外部音频设备。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203128.5312530.631.930.63133.932.933.94022.721.922.75020.320.220.36326.220.526.28021.815.721.810019.920.919.912516.813.616.816035.514.535.520047.217.747.225050.815.850.831551.310.651.34005410.75450059.810.459.863063.711.163.780064.510.164.5100074.110.674.1125076.51076.51600719.97120006910.569250072.910.972.9315069.91169.940007411.274500075.311.575.3630071.111.671.1800073.211.873.2100006411.6641250060.911.460.91600060.810.760.8SPL84.223.284.2N57.30.557.3median 64median 11.1median 64Delta10.11.410.126.325.821.422.12624.925.127.622.532.523.448.72655.818.860.922.167.2267019.372.317.674.217.774.319.575.31571.711.871.311.27410.574.21072.710.17210.67210.97511.374.811.671.71269.71269.612.371.112.669.61270.111.269.824.784.70.666.6median 12median 71.73.42.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SHApple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.15 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

耗电量

好吧,RTX 3080 Ti 并不完全节俭--从技术上讲,现在的 CPU/GPU 应该更加高效。

例如,要想在玩 Witcher 3 时和 Captiva 一样 "省 ",就必须将我们的 Aorus 设置为会议模式或节能模式。然而,游戏中的刷新率也达到了令人吃惊的水平(见噪音排放部分的表格)。

最重要的是,我们在 3DMark06 测试(平均负载)中测得的 150 瓦功耗非常低;相比之下,Captiva 的功耗仅为 85 瓦。

我们测得的最大值和临时值为 204 瓦,Delta 的 240 瓦电源可以轻松应对。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 1.4 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 13.4 / 19.3 / 20 Watt
Load midlight 150 / 218 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
Aorus 15 BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
HP Omen 16-wf000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
Power Consumption
10%
15%
23%
23%
-24%
Idle 150cd/m2 *
16
12.4
22%
18
-13%
12.8
20%
20.1
-26%
23.2
-45%
3DMark06 Return To Proxycon *
150
85
43%
Witcher 3 ultra *
196
175.8
10%
164
16%
141.8
28%
95.4
51%
214
-9%
1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25 *
204
210
-3%
179
12%
164.1
20%
117.2
43%
240
-18%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø195.8 (184.78-212.87)
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø206 (119.97-218.22)
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø16.4 (8.007-50.424)

Power consumption with external monitor

0153045607590105120135150165180195Tooltip
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø111.7 (73.66-137.61)
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø128.5 (72.41-134.8)
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø108.5 (66.21-138.54)
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø157.1 (70.07-161.31)
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø196 (189.22-200.53)
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø28.4 (27.223-37.112)

运行时间

Aorus 的运行时间令人失望,这可能是由于其空闲时的耗电量增加所致。技嘉安装了 99 瓦时的电池,但其运行时间仍与 Captiva的水平!配备 i7-13700H 和 RTX 4070 的新一代 Aorus BSF 的 99 瓦时电池续航时间延长了 65%,在 WLAN 测试中几乎是后者的两倍!它持续了 10 多个小时,而我们的 Aorus 持续了不到 5.5 个小时。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
5h 19min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 17min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 41min
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Aorus 15 BSF
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121
i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 53 Wh
HP Victus 16-r0077ng
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh
HP Omen 16-wf000
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
65%
-4%
34%
20%
-19%
11%
H.264
317
541
71%
296
-7%
WiFi v1.3
319
619
94%
315
-1%
426
34%
481
51%
307
-4%
Load
101
132
31%
96
-5%
89
-12%
68
-33%
Reader / Idle
654
688
328

Pros

+ 吸引人的设计与预算价格不符
+ 雷电 4
+ 强大的无线局域网
+ 色彩精确的 1,440p 显示屏,支持 DisplayP3
+ GPU 性能强于大多数 RTX 4070
+ 快速固态硬盘
+ 相对凉爽,声音不大

Cons

- 只有 3 个 USB 接口,只有 1 个 USB-A 接口
- 螺丝上有保修贴纸
- 720p 网络摄像头,而不是全高清摄像头
- 特殊功能键不亮
- 从 45 度开始进入待机状态
- 无 MUX 开关,高级 Optimus
- 闲置消耗,运行时间令人失望

结论 - 绝对有竞争力!

由 Aorus 15 YE5 提供:
由 Aorus 15 YE5 提供:

12 代 CPU 和 RTX 3080 Ti 的组合绝非过去式,尤其是在(3D)性能方面。Aorus 15 YE5 可以击败配备 RTX 4070 的大多数其他游戏笔记本电脑,因此值得考虑,尤其是考虑到其低廉的价格。尽管如此,Aorus 并没有像许多竞争对手那样放弃雷电 4、快速固态硬盘或全面设计等现代功能。

它的效率不高,这主要体现在笔记本电脑的运行时间令人失望,尽管它的电池容量很大。老式的 720p 网络摄像头可能并不是绝对不能使用,但对于游戏玩家来说,这是一个明显的缺点。Aorus 15 YE5 的一个令人讨厌的典型特点是,只要将显示屏关闭 45 度,设备就会迅速切换到待机状态。

Aorus 15 YE5 以低廉的价格提供了非常强大的游戏性能,而不会像其他一些更昂贵的竞争对手那样显得廉价。它的上一代 GPU 在 3D 性能方面尤其令人印象深刻,而在效率和运行时间方面则有所欠缺。

市场上有一些价格相近的替代产品,如配备 RTX 4070 的微星 Katana。不过,在很多游戏中,Aorus 的速度应该会更快一些。此外,Katana 没有 Thunderbolt 4 功能,也没有高品质的感觉。反过来,微星的优势在于运行时间更长。惠普 惠普 Victus 16惠普 Victus 16 也有类似的表现--它的价格甚至更高一些,但速度和品质感都不如 Aorus。目前,您需要多花大约 300 美元才能购买到新一代 Aorus。

价格和供应情况

Aorus 15 YE5 目前的售价约为 1,500 美元。在撰写本文时,我们在美国的任何在线零售商处都找不到这款产品的销售信息。

Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH - 12/15/2023 v7 (old)
Christian Hintze

Chassis
78 / 98 → 79%
Keyboard
81%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
64 / 80 → 80%
Weight
61 / 10-66 → 91%
Battery
63 / 95 → 67%
Display
89%
Games Performance
99%
Application Performance
94%
Temperature
88 / 95 → 93%
Noise
83 / 90 → 92%
Audio
70%
Camera
34 / 85 → 40%
Average
76%
87%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Aorus 15 YE5 评测:省钱的高端游戏笔记本电脑
Christian Hintze, 2023-12-21 (Update: 2023-12-21)